Economic model predictive control of nonlinear process systems using empirical models

Economic model predictive control (EMPC) is a feedback control technique that attempts to tightly integrate economic optimization and feedback control since it is a predictive control scheme that is formulated with an objective function representing the process economics. As its name implies, EMPC requires the availability of a dynamic model to compute its control actions and such a model may be obtained either through application of first principles or through system identification techniques. In industrial practice, it may be difficult in general to obtain an accurate first‐principles model of the process. Motivated by this, in the present work, Lyapunov‐based EMPC (LEMPC) is designed with a linear empirical model that allows for closed‐loop stability guarantees in the context of nonlinear chemical processes. Specifically, when the linear model provides a sufficient degree of accuracy in the region where time varying economically optimal operation is considered, conditions for closed‐loop stability under the LEMPC scheme based on the empirical model are derived. The LEMPC scheme is applied to a chemical process example to demonstrate its closed‐loop stability and performance properties as well as significant computational advantages. © 2014 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 61: 816–830, 2015     

Distributed economic model predictive control for operational safety of nonlinear processes

Achieving operational safety of chemical processes while operating them in an economically‐optimal manner is a matter of great importance. Our recent work integrated process safety with process control by incorporating safety‐based constraints within model predictive control (MPC) design; however, the safety‐based MPC was developed with a centralized architecture, with the result that computation time limitations within a sampling period may reduce the effectiveness of such a controller design for promoting process safety. To address this potential practical limitation of the safety‐based control design, in this work, we propose the integration of a distributed model predictive control architecture with Lyapunov‐based economic model predictive control (LEMPC) formulated with safety‐based constraints. We consider both iterative and sequential distributed control architectures, and the partitioning of inputs between the various optimization problems in the distributed structure based on their impact on process operational safety. Moreover, sufficient conditions that ensure feasibility and closed‐loop stability of the iterative and sequential safety distributed LEMPC designs are given. A comparison between the proposed safety distributed EMPC controllers and the safety centralized EMPC is demonstrated via a chemical process example. © 2017 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 63: 3404–3418, 2017     

Smart manufacturing: Handling preventive actuator maintenance and economics using model predictive control

Integrating components and systems of the manufacturing process is an important area of research to enable the future development and deployment of the Smart Manufacturing paradigm. An economic model predictive control (EMPC) scheme is proposed that effectively integrates scheduled preventive control actuator maintenance, process economics, and process control into a unified methodology. To accomplish this goal, a Lyapunov‐based EMPC (LEMPC) scheme is formulated for handling changing number of online actuators (i.e., changing number of manipulated inputs). Closed‐loop stability under the proposed LEMPC is proven. Subsequently, the LEMPC is applied to a chemical process network used for benzene alkylation to demonstrate that the LEMPC can maintain stability and improve dynamic economic performance of the process network in the presence of changing number of available control actuators resulting from scheduled preventive maintenance tasks. © 2014 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 60: 2179–2196, 2014     

Real‐time economic model predictive control of nonlinear process systems

Closed‐loop stability of nonlinear systems under real‐time Lyapunov‐based economic model predictive control (LEMPC) with potentially unknown and time‐varying computational delay is considered. To address guaranteed closed‐loop stability (in the sense of boundedness of the closed‐loop state in a compact state‐space set), an implementation strategy is proposed which features a triggered evaluation of the LEMPC optimization problem to compute an input trajectory over a finite‐time prediction horizon in advance. At each sampling period, stability conditions must be satisfied for the precomputed LEMPC control action to be applied to the closed‐loop system. If the stability conditions are not satisfied, a backup explicit stabilizing controller is applied over the sampling period. Closed‐loop stability under the real‐time LEMPC strategy is analyzed and specific stability conditions are derived. The real‐time LEMPC scheme is applied to a chemical process network example to demonstrate closed‐loop stability and closed‐loop economic performance improvement over that achieved for operation at the economically optimal steady state. © 2014 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 61: 555–571, 2015     

Economic model predictive control of nonlinear time‐delay systems: Closed‐loop stability and delay compensation

Closed‐loop stability of nonlinear time‐delay systems under Lyapunov‐based economic model predictive control (LEMPC) is considered. LEMPC is initially formulated with an ordinary differential equation model and is designed on the basis of an explicit stabilizing control law. To address closed‐loop stability under LEMPC, first, we consider the stability properties of the sampled‐data system resulting from the nonlinear continuous‐time delay system with state and input delay under a sample‐and‐hold implementation of the explicit controller. The steady‐state of this sampled‐data closed‐loop system is shown to be practically stable. Second, conditions such that closed‐loop stability, in the sense of boundedness of the closed‐loop state, under LEMPC are derived. A chemical process example is used to demonstrate that indeed closed‐loop stability is maintained under LEMPC for sufficiently small time‐delays. To cope with performance degradation owing to the effect of input delay, a predictor feedback LEMPC methodology is also proposed. The predictor feedback LEMPC design employs a predictor to compute a prediction of the state after the input delay period and an LEMPC scheme that is formulated with a differential difference equation (DDE) model, which describes the time‐delay system, initialized with the predicted state. The predictor feedback LEMPC is also applied to the chemical process example and yields improved closed‐loop stability and economic performance properties. © 2015 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 61: 4152–4165, 2015     

On identification of well‐conditioned nonlinear systems: Application to economic model predictive control of nonlinear processes

The focus of this work is on economic model predictive control (EMPC) that utilizes well‐conditioned polynomial nonlinear state‐space (PNLSS) models for processes with nonlinear dynamics. Specifically, the article initially addresses the development of a nonlinear system identification technique for a broad class of nonlinear processes which leads to the construction of PNLSS dynamic models which are well‐conditioned over a broad region of process operation in the sense that they can be correctly integrated in real‐time using explicit numerical integration methods via time steps that are significantly larger than the ones required by nonlinear state‐space models identified via existing techniques. Working within the framework of PNLSS models, additional constraints are imposed in the identification procedure to ensure well‐conditioning of the identified nonlinear dynamic models. This development is key because it enables the design of Lyapunov‐based EMPC (LEMPC) systems for nonlinear processes using the well‐conditioned nonlinear models that can be readily implemented in real‐time as the computational burden required to compute the control actions within the process sampling period is reduced. A stability analysis for this LEMPC design is provided that guarantees closed‐loop stability of a process under certain conditions when an LEMPC based on a nonlinear empirical model is used. Finally, a classical chemical reactor example demonstrates both the system identification and LEMPC design techniques, and the significant advantages in terms of computation time reduction in LEMPC calculations when using the nonlinear empirical model. © 2015 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 61: 3353–3373, 2015     

Economic model predictive control of nonlinear process systems using Lyapunov techniques

In this work, we develop model predictive control (MPC) designs, which are capable of optimizing closed‐loop performance with respect to general economic considerations for a broad class of nonlinear process systems. Specifically, in the proposed designs, the economic MPC optimizes a cost function, which is related directly to desired economic considerations and is not necessarily dependent on a steady‐state—unlike conventional MPC designs. First, we consider nonlinear systems with synchronous measurement sampling and uncertain variables. The proposed economic MPC is designed via Lyapunov‐based techniques and has two different operation modes. The first operation mode corresponds to the period in which the cost function should be optimized (e.g., normal production period); and in this operation mode, the MPC maintains the closed‐loop system state within a predefined stability region and optimizes the cost function to its maximum extent. The second operation mode corresponds to operation in which the system is driven by the economic MPC to an appropriate steady‐state. In this operation mode, suitable Lyapunov‐based constraints are incorporated in the economic MPC design to guarantee that the closed‐loop system state is always bounded in the predefined stability region and is ultimately bounded in a small region containing the origin. Subsequently, we extend the results to nonlinear systems subject to asynchronous and delayed measurements and uncertain variables. Under the assumptions that there exist an upper bound on the interval between two consecutive asynchronous measurements and an upper bound on the maximum measurement delay, an economic MPC design which takes explicitly into account asynchronous and delayed measurements and enforces closed‐loop stability is proposed. All the proposed economic MPC designs are illustrated through a chemical process example and their performance and robustness are evaluated through simulations. © 2011 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 2012     

An economic model predictive control approach to integrated production management and process operation

Managing production schedules and tracking time‐varying demand of certain products while optimizing process economics are subjects of central importance in industrial applications. We investigate the use of economic model predictive control (EMPC) in tracking a production schedule. Specifically, given that only a small subset of the total process state vector is typically required to track certain scheduled values, we design a novel EMPC scheme, through proper construction of the objective function and constraints, that forces specific process states to meet the production schedule and varies the rest of the process states in a way that optimizes process economic performance. Conditions under which feasibility and closed‐loop stability of a nonlinear process under such an EMPC for schedule management can be guaranteed are developed. The proposed EMPC scheme is demonstrated through a chemical process example in which the product concentration is requested to follow a certain production schedule. © 2016 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 63: 1892–1906, 2017     

Actuator stiction compensation via model predictive control for nonlinear processes

The problem of valve stiction is addressed, which is a nonlinear friction phenomenon that causes poor performance of control loops in the process industries. A model predictive control (MPC) stiction compensation formulation is developed including detailed dynamics for a sticky valve and additional constraints on the input rate of change and actuation magnitude to reduce control loop performance degradation and to prevent the MPC from requesting physically unrealistic control actions due to stiction. Although developed with a focus on stiction, the MPC‐based compensation method presented is general and has potential to compensate for other nonlinear valve dynamics which have some similarities to those caused by stiction. Feasibility and closed‐loop stability of the proposed MPC formulation are proven for a sufficiently small sampling period when Lyapunov‐based constraints are incorporated. Using a chemical process example with an economic model predictive controller (EMPC), the selection of appropriate constraints for the proposed method is demonstrated. The example verified the incorporation of the stiction dynamics and actuation magnitude constraints in the EMPC causes it to select set‐points that the valve output can reach and causes the operating constraints to be met. © 2016 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 62: 2004–2023, 2016     

Selection of control configurations for economic model predictive control systems

Economic model predictive control (EMPC) is a feedback control method that dictates a potentially dynamic (time‐varying) operating policy to optimize the process economics. The objective function used in the EMPC system may be a general nonlinear function that describes the process/system economics. As this function is not derived on the sole basis of classical control considerations (stabilization, tracking, and optimal control action calculation) but rather on the basis of economics, selecting the appropriate control configuration, and quantifying the influence of a given input on an economic cost is an important task for the proper design and computational efficiency of an EMPC scheme. Owing to these considerations, an input selection methodology for EMPC is proposed which utilizes the relative degree and the sensitivity of the economic cost with respect to an input to identify and select stabilizing manipulated inputs with the most dynamic and steady‐state influence on the economic cost function to be assigned to EMPC. Other considerations for input selection for EMPC are also discussed and integrated into a proposed input selection methodology for EMPC. The control configuration selection method for EMPC is demonstrated using a chemical process example. © 2014 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 60: 3230–3242, 2014     

A feedback control framework for safe and economically‐optimal operation of nonlinear processes

Maintaining safe operation of chemical processes and meeting environmental constraints are issues of paramount importance in the area of process systems and control engineering, and are ideally achieved while maximizing economic profit. It has long been argued that process safety is fundamentally a process control problem, yet few research efforts have been directed toward integrating the rather disparate domains of process safety and process control. Economic model predictive control (EMPC) has attracted significant attention recently due to its ability to optimize process operation accounting directly for process economics considerations. However, there is very limited work on the problem of integrating safety considerations in EMPC to ensure simultaneous safe operation and maximization of process profit. Motivated by the above considerations, this work develops three EMPC schemes that adjust in real‐time the size of the safety sets in which the process state should reside to ensure safe process operation and feedback control of the process state while optimizing economics via time‐varying process operation. Recursive feasibility and closed‐loop stability are established for a sufficiently small EMPC sampling period. The proposed schemes, which effectively integrate feedback control, process economics, and safety considerations, are demonstrated with a chemical process example. © 2016 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 62: 2391–2409, 2016     

Error‐triggered on‐line model identification for model‐based feedback control

In industry, it may be difficult in many applications to obtain a first‐principles model of the process, in which case a linear empirical model constructed using process data may be used in the design of a feedback controller. However, linear empirical models may not capture the nonlinear dynamics over a wide region of state‐space and may also perform poorly when significant plant variations and disturbances occur. In the present work, an error‐triggered on‐line model identification approach is introduced for closed‐loop systems under model‐based feedback control strategies. The linear models are re‐identified on‐line when significant prediction errors occur. A moving horizon error detector is used to quantify the model accuracy and to trigger the model re‐identification on‐line when necessary. The proposed approach is demonstrated through two chemical process examples using a model‐based feedback control strategy termed Lyapunov‐based economic model predictive control (LEMPC). The chemical process examples illustrate that the proposed error‐triggered on‐line model identification strategy can be used to obtain more accurate state predictions to improve process economics while maintaining closed‐loop stability of the process under LEMPC. © 2016 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 63: 949–966, 2017     

基于经济模型预测控制的金氰化浸出过程动态实时优化

针对金氰化浸出过程时间常数大、不确定性强等问题，提出了一种基于经济模型预测控制（EMPC）的动态实时优化方法。不同于传统的模型预测控制，EMPC将经济指标直接作为滚动优化的目标函数，在每个采样时刻求解滚动窗口内的最优操作序列。和稳态优化方法相比，基于EMPC的方法能保证动态最优性，提高经济收益。此外，金氰化浸出过程受随机噪声、未知参数可变等不确定性影响，提出使用扩展卡尔曼滤波（EKF），通过构造增广系统对状态变量及不确定参数进行在线同步估计，加强EMPC的准确性和可靠性。仿真结果表明，提出的EMPC+EKF策略能有效提高金氰化浸出过程的经济性能。     

Lyapunov‐based MPC with robust moving horizon estimation and its triggered implementation

In this work, we consider moving horizon state estimation (MHE)‐based model predictive control (MPC) of nonlinear systems. Specifically, we consider the Lyapunov‐based MPC (LMPC) developed in (Mhaskar et al., IEEE Trans Autom Control. 2005;50:1670–1680; Syst Control Lett. 2006;55:650–659) and the robust MHE (RMHE) developed in (Liu J, Chem Eng Sci. 2013;93:376–386). First, we focus on the case that the RMHE and the LMPC are evaluated every sampling time. An estimate of the stability region of the output control system is first established; and then sufficient conditions under which the closed‐loop system is guaranteed to be stable are derived. Subsequently, we propose a triggered implementation strategy for the RMHE‐based LMPC to reduce its computational load. The triggering condition is designed based on measurements of the output and its time derivatives. To ensure the closed‐loop stability, the formulations of the RMHE and the LMPC are also modified accordingly to account for the potential open‐loop operation. A chemical process is used to illustrate the proposed approaches. © 2013 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 59: 4273–4286, 2013     

Composite fast‐slow MPC design for nonlinear singularly perturbed systems

The design of a composite control system for nonlinear singularly perturbed systems using model predictive control (MPC) is described. Specifically, a composite control system comprised of a “fast” MPC acting to regulate the fast dynamics and a “slow” MPC acting to regulate the slow dynamics is designed. The composite MPC system uses multirate sampling of the plant state measurements, i.e., fast sampling of the fast state variables is used in the fast MPC and slow‐sampling of the slow state variables is used in the slow MPC. Using singular perturbation theory, the stability and optimality of the closed‐loop nonlinear singularly perturbed system are analyzed. A chemical process example which exhibits two‐time‐scale behavior is used to demonstrate the structure and implementation of the proposed fast–slow MPC architecture in a practical setting. © 2012 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 58: 1802–1811, 2012     

Economic model predictive control of stochastic nonlinear systems

This work focuses on the design of stochastic Lyapunov‐based economic model predictive control (SLEMPC) systems for a broad class of stochastic nonlinear systems with input constraints. Under the assumption of stabilizability of the origin of the stochastic nonlinear system via a stochastic Lyapunov‐based control law, an economic model predictive controller is proposed that utilizes suitable constraints based on the stochastic Lyapunov‐based controller to ensure economic optimality, feasibility and stability in probability in a well‐characterized region of the state‐space surrounding the origin. A chemical process example is used to illustrate the application of the approach and demonstrate its economic benefits with respect to an EMPC scheme that treats the disturbances in a deterministic, bounded manner. © 2018 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 64: 3312–3322, 2018     

Assessing the Performance of Model Predictive Controllers

Performance assessment of model predictive controllers is a problem of significant industrial relevance. Model predictive controllers belong to a class of linear time‐varying controllers, which compute the future control actions by minimizing a constrained, time‐varying objective function. In this work we propose a performance statistic that takes into account the time‐varying and constrained nature of model predictive control. The proposed measure compares the achieved objective function with its design value, online. Analytical expressions are derived to calculate the expected value of the design objective function under closed loop conditions. Simulation and industrial case studies are used to illustrate the applicability of the proposed metric.     

Integration of Design and Control: A Robust Control Approach Using MPC

This paper presents a new method to integrate process control with process design. The process design is based on steady‐state costs, .i.e., capital and operating costs. Control is incorporated into the design in terms of a variability cost. This term is calculated based on the non‐linear process model, represented here as a nominal linear model supplemented with model parameter uncertainty. Robust control tools are then used within the approach to assess closed‐loop robust stability and to calculate closed‐loop variability. The integrated method results in a non‐linear constrained optimization problem with an objective function that consists of the sum of the steady costs and the variability cost. Optimization using the traditional sequential approach and the new integrated method was applied to design a multi‐component distillation column using a Model Predictive Control (MPC) algorithm. The optimization results show that the integrated method can lead to significant cost savings when compared to the traditional sequential approach. In addition, an RGA analysis was performed to study the effects of process interactions on the optimization results.