Phase I dose‐escalation study of capmatinib (INC280) in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors

Capmatinib is a highly specific, potent and selective MET inhibitor. This was an open‐label, multicenter, dose‐escalation, phase I study conducted in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors (not selected based on their MET status). The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or highest studied dose being safe. Secondary objectives included safety, pharmacokinetics and preliminary antitumor activity. Dose escalation was guided by a Bayesian Logistic Regression Model dependent on dose‐limiting toxicities (DLT) in cycle 1. Of 44 adult Japanese patients with confirmed advanced solid tumors enrolled, 29 received capmatinib capsules (doses ranging from 100 mg once daily [q.d.] to 600 mg twice daily [b.i.d.]) and 15 received tablets (200 mg b.i.d. and 400 mg b.i.d.). DLT occurred in two patients: grade 2 suicidal ideation (600 mg b.i.d. capsule) and grade 3 depression (400 mg b.i.d. tablet). MTD was not reached. The highest studied dose determined to be safe as tablet was 400 mg b.i.d., whereas it is not yet determined for capsules. Most common adverse events suspected to be drug‐related were increased blood creatinine, nausea, decreased appetite, vomiting and diarrhea. Following repeated daily dosing up to day 15 by q.d. or b.i.d. regimen using capsules, median time to reach maximum plasma drug concentration (T_max) was 1.0‐4.0 hours; absorption was more rapid after dosing using tablets, with median T_max of 1.0 hour on both days 1 and 15. Eight patients had a best overall response of stable disease. These data support further clinical development of capmatinib.     

First‐in‐human phase I study of E7090, a novel selective fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitor,in patients with advanced solid tumors

Fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFR) are a family of transmembrane receptor tyrosine kinases involved in regulating cellular processes. FGFR mutations are implicated in oncogenesis, representing therapeutic potential in the form of FGFR inhibitors. This phase I, first‐in‐human study in Japan evaluated safety and tolerability of E7090, a potent selective FGFR1‐3 inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors. Dose escalation (daily oral dose of 1‐180 mg) was carried out to assess dose‐limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose, and pharmacokinetics. Pharmacodynamic markers (serum phosphate, fibroblast growth factor 23, and 1,25‐(OH)₂‐vitamin D) were also evaluated. A total of 24 patients refractory to standard therapy or for whom no appropriate treatment was available were enrolled. No DLT were observed up to the 140‐mg dose; one patient in the 180‐mg cohort experienced a DLT (increased aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase, grade 3). The maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Dose‐dependent increases in the maximum concentration and area under the curve from time 0 to the last measurable concentration were observed up to 180 mg. Dose‐dependent increases were observed in all pharmacodynamic markers and plateaued at 100‐140 mg, indicating sufficient FGFR pathway inhibition at doses ≥100 mg. In conclusion, E7090 showed a manageable safety profile with no DLT at doses ≤140 mg. Maximum tolerated dose was not determined. The recommended dose for the follow‐up expansion part, restricted to patients with tumors harboring FGFR alterations, was determined as 140 mg, once daily.     

Dose escalation study of proton beam therapy with concurrent chemotherapy for stage III non‐small cell lung cancer

The purpose of this study is to determine the recommended dose (RD) of proton beam therapy (PBT) for inoperable stage III non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We tested two prescribed doses of PBT: 66 Gy (relative biological effectiveness [RBE]) in 33 fractions and 74 Gy (RBE) in 37 fractions in arms 1 and 2, respectively. The planning target volume (PTV) included the primary tumor and metastatic lymph nodes with adequate margins. Concurrent chemotherapy included intravenous cisplatin (60 mg/m², day 1) and oral S‐1 (80, 100 or 120 mg based on body surface area, days 1–14), repeated as four cycles every 4 weeks. Dose‐limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade 3 or severe toxicities related to PBT during days 1–90. Each dose level was performed in three patients, and then escalated to the next level if no DLT occurred. When one patient developed a DLT, three additional patients were enrolled. Overall, nine patients (five men, four women; median age, 72 years) were enrolled, including six in arm 1 and three in arm 2. The median follow‐up time was 43 months, and the median progression‐free survival was 15 months. In arm 1, grade 3 infection occurred in one of six patients, but no other DLT was reported. Similarly, no DLT occurred in arm 2. However, one patient in arm 2 developed grade 3 esophageal fistula at 9 months after the initiation of PBT. Therefore, we determined that 66 Gy (RBE) is the RD from a clinical viewpoints. (Clinical trial registration no. UMIN000005585)     

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of E7070, a chloroindolyl-sulfonamide anticancer agent, administered on a weekly schedule to patients with solid tumors.

PURPOSE: E7070 is a sulfonamide that induces arrest at the G(1)-S boundary with subsequent dose and exposure-dependent apoptosis. The objectives of this study were (a) to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended safe dose (RD) of E7070 for additional evaluation, (b) to define the dose limiting toxicity(ies) [DLT(s)], (c) to study the pharmacokinetics of E7070, and (d) to seek preliminary evidence of antitumor activity. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with solid tumors who had either failed or were not amenable to established forms of treatment were eligible for the study. E7070 was administered i.v. at weekly intervals for 4 consecutive weeks to cohorts of 3-6 patients at each dose level. Treatment was repeated six weekly in the absence of tumor progression. A Fibonacci-like scheme was used for dose escalation. The MTD was determined in a stepwise procedure for two cohorts of patients; the "initial patient cohort" who met the original inclusion criteria (group A) and the "better prognosis cohort" (group B) who had adequate hepatic function, less extensive tumor involvement of the liver, and no more than three previous lines of chemotherapy. The RD was defined as the highest dose at which the incidence of definitely drug-related DLTs was <33%. The pharmacokinetic profile of E7070 was determined. RESULTS: Overall, 46 patients entered the study; information from 36 of the 37 patients forming group A was used to determine the overall MTD. An additional 9 patients plus 9 patients from group A who met the more restrictive inclusion criteria made up group B. The MTD was 500 mg/m(2)/week for both groups. Reversible neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were the most common DLTs. Other DLTs included stomatitis, hyperglycemia, sepsis, fever, hemorrhage, diarrhea, nausea, and fatigue. The pharmacokinetics of E7070 were nonlinear over the dose range 160-500 mg/m(2). One partial response was observed in a patient with an endometrial adenocarcinoma who had previously been treated with radiotherapy. Twelve other patients had stable disease as their best response (27%); among them. 1 patient with metastatic melanoma who received 21 cycles of therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The RD for further study of E7070 using this administration schedule is 400 mg/m(2)/week. Using this schedule, the predominant toxicity of E7070 is myelosuppression. E7070 has anticancer activity in pretreated patients.     

Clinical profile of gilteritinib in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia: An open‐label phase 1 study

Gilteritinib, a novel, highly specific, potent fms‐like tyrosine kinase 3/AXL inhibitor, demonstrated antileukemic activity in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In this open‐label phase 1 study (NCT02181660), Japanese patients (aged ≥18 years) with R/R AML received once‐daily gilteritinib, escalating from 20 to 300 mg/d. Primary endpoints were safety/tolerability, including the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended dose (RD); secondary endpoints were antileukemic activity and pharmacokinetics (PK). Twenty‐four Japanese patients with R/R AML received once‐daily oral gilteritinib in 1 of 6 dose‐escalation cohorts (20, 40, 80, 120, 200, and 300 mg/d). Gilteritinib was well tolerated. The MTD was 200 mg/d; dose‐limiting toxicities were grade 3 tumor lysis syndrome (120 mg/d; n = 1); and grade 3 elevated blood lactate dehydrogenase, amylase, blood creatine phosphokinase levels, and syncope (all n = 2; 300 mg/d). The RD was 120 mg/d. The most common drug‐related grade ≥3 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (n = 4 [16.7%]) and increased blood creatine phosphokinase (n = 3 [12.5%]). Gilteritinib had a dose‐proportional PK profile. Among patients with mutated fms‐like tyrosine kinase 3, the overall response rate (ORR) was 80% (n = 4 of 5; complete remission [CR] with incomplete platelet recovery, 1 [20%]; CR with incomplete hematologic recovery, 2 [40%]; partial remission (PR), 1 [20%]). Among patients with wild‐type fms‐like tyrosine kinase 3, ORR was 36.4%; (n = 4 of 11; CR, 1 [9.1%]; CR with incomplete platelet recovery, 2 [18.2%]; PR, 1 [9.1%]). In conclusion, gilteritinib was well tolerated and demonstrated antileukemic activity in a Japanese R/R AML population.     

A review of dose-limiting events in phase I trials: antimetabolites show unpredictable relationships between dose and toxicity

INTRODUCTION: In a sample of NCIC CTG phase I trials we noted that studies of antimetabolites were frequently confounded by the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) at doses well below those ultimately recommended (recommended dose, RD) for further study, necessitating frequent expansion of dose levels and usually a change to more conservative dose escalation. This slowed development, exposed patients to ineffective doses of drugs, and raises concerns about the safety of current trial designs which include a single patient per dose level. Conversely, some patients treated at the RD may be receiving inadequate doses of anticancer drugs. To determine if this was a general phenomenon, we undertook a review of the results of a large group of phase I trials of cytotoxic agents. METHODS: Starting dose (SD), number of dose levels, dose at first DLT (D-DLT), maximum tolerated doses (MTD, dose at which DLT is seen in two or more patients) and RD were extracted from the NCI-Canada phase I trial database, and from a literature survey of phase I studies published between 1985 and 1999. Combination phase I and phase Ib studies were excluded. RESULTS: The review included 33 trials with antimetabolites and 60 with other cytotoxic agents. The median ratio D-DLT/MTD was 0.33 for antimetabolites and 0.75 for other cytotoxic agents (P < 0.01). Similarly, the median ratio D-DLT/RD was 0.43 for antimetabolites and 1 for other cytotoxic agents (P < 0.01). The median number of dose levels tested was nine for antimetabolites and six for other cytotoxic agents. DISCUSSION: Statistically significant differences in the ratios D-DLT/MTD and D-DLT/RD between antimetabolites and other cytotoxic compounds were noted, confirming our initial observations that unpredictable DLT occurs earlier and at lower dose levels in phase I clinical trials of antimetabolites than would be expected as compared to other classes ofcytotoxic agents. Toxicity thus appears to be incompletely predicted by dose alone for antimetabolites. DLT may occur in certain patients at doses well below the RD. Current phase I design may not be ideal for development of these compounds, and should focus on pharmacodynamic endpoints in addition to traditional pharmacokinetic and clinical endpoints.     

A study of amsalog (CI-921) administered orally on a 5-day schedule, with bioavailability and pharmacokinetically guided dose escalation

PURPOSE: Amsalog is a derivative of 9-aminoacridine. Phase I studies using intravenous (i.v.) amsalog have shown the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) to be phlebitis and myelosuppression. Phase II studies using a variety of schedules have shown evidence of activity in patients with large-cell lung, breast, and head and neck cancers. Preclinical studies demonstrated that amsalog is active orally: a clinical study of the oral bioavailability of amsalog was therefore performed. METHODS: A group of 20 patients with refractory malignancies were treated. There were two phases of the study: a pharmacokinetic comparison of i.v. against oral amsalog, followed by a pharmacokinetically guided oral dose escalation study. In the first phase of the study, 11 patients were treated. Amsalog 50 mg/m2 was administered i.v., and 50 mg/m2 and 200 mg/m2 orally. In the second phase of the study, 9 patients were treated in three cohorts of three. On day 1 of a 5-day schedule, amsalog was administered i.v. at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 200 mg/m2. Subsequent doses were given orally, starting at a dose of 200 mg/m2 per day, with intrapatient dose escalation of up to 100% for the second cycle. Doses were escalated further in subsequent cohorts, based on oral bioavailability and toxicity. RESULTS: Oral bioavailability of 50 mg/m2 amsalog was 34%. In the dose escalation phase, DLT was neutropenia; other toxicities included malaise and nausea. The MTD was 1600 mg/m2 per day for 5 days. The plasma AUC using 1600 mg/m2 by the oral route was higher than that achieved using 200 mg/m2 by the i.v. route. CONCLUSION: Amsalog can be tolerated orally on a 5-day schedule at doses up to 1600 mg/m2. The recommended dose for further evaluation is 800 mg/m2 daily for 5 days, repeated three weekly.     

Phase I study of BBR 2778, a new aza-anthracenedione, in advanced or refractory non-Hodgkin''s lymphoma.

Background:BBR 2778 is a novel aza-anthracenedione showing no cardiotoxicity and superior activity compared to doxorubicin and mitoxantrone in animal models. Objectives of this phase I study included the determination of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the dose limiting toxicity (DLT), clinical pharmacokinetics (PK), and antitumor activity. Patients with relapsed or refractory, advanced non-Hodgkins lymphoma were included. Patients and methods:Patients were treated with a q1w × 3 schedule on the basis of a modified Fibonacci dose escalation method. Seven groups with a total of twenty-six patients were treated at dosages of 5, 10, 16.5, 25, 34, 56 or 84 mg/m²/w, respectively. Results:DLT was observed on the seventh dose level with neutropenia WHO grade 4 in three of six patients. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed a large volume of distribution (13.5–17.5 l/kg), a high plasma clearance (0.65–1.74 l/h/kg) and a long elimination half-life (14.7–31.9 h). Tumor response included three complete remissions and two partial remissions. Conclusions:Neutropenia is the DLT of the new aza-anthracenedione BBR 2778. The recommend dose is 84 mg/m² in a q1w × 3 schedule. PK data are consistent with a linear kinetic of BBR 2778 comparable to mitoxantrone. This new drug shows promising activity in intensively pretreated patients with relapsed or refractory NHL. Based on this results, phase II studies with this new compound are underway.     

Phase I study of single‐agent ribociclib in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors

The cyclin D‐CDK4/6‐INK4‐Rb pathway is frequently dysregulated in cancers. Ribociclib, an orally available, selective CDK4/6 inhibitor, showed preliminary clinical activity in a phase I study in the USA and Europe for patients with solid tumors and lymphomas. The present study aimed to determine the single‐agent maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose for expansion (RDE) in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. Ribociclib safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetic profile, and preliminary antitumor activity were also assessed. Japanese patients with solid tumors that had progressed on prior therapies received escalating doses of single‐agent ribociclib on a 3‐weeks‐on/1‐week‐off schedule. Treatment continued until the development of toxicity or disease progression. A dose escalation was planned for patients with esophageal cancer. In the dose‐escalation phase, 4 patients received 400 mg ribociclib and 13 patients received 600 mg ribociclib. Four patients experienced dose‐limiting toxicities, 3 of whom were in the 600 mg group. The RDE was declared to be 600 mg, and the MTD was not determined. The most frequent adverse events were hematologic and gastrointestinal. Four patients achieved stable disease at the 600 mg dose; no patients achieved complete or partial response. All patients discontinued the study, the majority due to disease progression. No patients discontinued due to adverse events. Dose escalation was not pursued due to lack of observed efficacy in esophageal cancer. At the RDE of 600 mg/d on a 3‐weeks‐on/1‐week‐off schedule, ribociclib showed acceptable safety and tolerability profiles in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors.     

Phase 1 study of capmatinib in MET‐positive solid tumor patients: Dose escalation and expansion of selected cohorts

Capmatinib is an oral, ATP‐competitive, and highly potent, type 1b MET inhibitor. Herein, we report phase 1 dose‐escalation results for capmatinib in advanced MET‐positive solid tumor patients and dose expansion in advanced non‐lung tumors. Capmatinib was well tolerated with a manageable safety profile across all explored doses. Dose‐limiting toxicities (DLT) occurred at 200 mg twice daily (bid), 250 mg bid, and 450 mg bid capsules; however, no DLT were reported at 600 mg bid (capsules). Capmatinib tablets at 400 mg bid had comparable tolerability and exposure to that of 600 mg bid capsules. Maximum tolerated dose was not reached; recommended phase 2 dose was 400 mg bid tablets/600 mg bid capsules; at this dose, C_trough >EC₉₀ (90% inhibition of c‐MET phosphorylation in animal models) is expected to be achieved and maintained. Among the dose‐expansion patients (N = 38), best overall response across all cohorts was stable disease (gastric cancer 22%, hepatocellular carcinoma 46%, other indications 28%); two other indication patients with gene copy number (GCN) ≥6 achieved substantial tumor reduction. Near‐complete immunohistochemically determined phospho‐MET inhibition (H‐score = 2) was shown following capmatinib 450 mg bid capsule in paired biopsies obtained from one advanced colorectal cancer patient. Incidence of high‐level MET GCN (GCN ≥6) and MET‐overexpressing (immunohistochemistry 3+) tumors in the expansion cohorts was 8% and 13%, respectively; no MET mutations were observed. Thus, the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of capmatinib was 600 mg bid capsule/400 mg bid tablet. Capmatinib was well tolerated and showed antitumor activity and acceptable safety profile at the RP2D. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01324479).     

A phase 1 trial of imatinib,bevacizumab, and metronomic cyclophosphamide in advanced colorectal cancer

Background:

This phase 1 clinical trial was conducted to determine the safety, maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), and pharmacokinetics of imatinib, bevacizumab, and metronomic cyclophosphamide in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC).

Methods:

Patients with refractory stage IV CRC were treated with bevacizumab 5 mg kg⁻¹ i.v. every 2 weeks (fixed dose) plus oral cyclophosphamide q.d. and imatinib q.d. or b.i.d. in 28-day cycles with 3+3 dose escalation. Response was assessed every two cycles. Pharmacokinetics of imatinib and cyclophosphamide and circulating tumour, endothelial, and immune cell subsets were measured.

Results:

Thirty-five patients were enrolled. Maximum-tolerated doses were cyclophosphamide 50 mg q.d., imatinib 400 mg q.d., and bevacizumab 5 mg kg⁻¹ i.v. every 2 weeks. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) included nausea/vomiting, neutropaenia, hyponatraemia, fistula, and haematuria. The DLT window required expansion to 42 days (1.5 cycles) to capture delayed toxicities. Imatinib exposure increased insignificantly after adding cyclophosphamide. Seven patients (20%) experienced stable disease for >6 months. Circulating tumour, endothelial, or immune cells were not associated with progression-free survival.

Conclusion:

The combination of metronomic cyclophosphamide, imatinib, and bevacizumab is safe and tolerable without significant drug interactions. A subset of patients experienced prolonged stable disease independent of dose level.     

Phase I study of CPT-11 and bolus 5-FU/<Emphasis Type="Italic">l</Emphasis>-leucovorin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Background Irinotecan (CPT-11) and bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin (LV) administered weekly for 4 weeks every 42 days (Saltz regimen) is active but substantially toxic in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). The efficacy and toxicity of this regimen, however, have not been determined in Japanese patients with metastatic CRC.Methods We investigated the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and recommended phase II dose (RD) for CPT-11 given i.v. (90-min infusion) and bolus 5-FU plus biologically active l-LV administered weekly for 3 weeks every 28 days (modified Saltz regimen) in Japanese patients with metastatic CRC. Eighteen patients with measurable disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 2 or less, and adequate organ functions were enrolled.Results At dose level 2 (CPT-11, 100mg/m²; 5-FU, 400mg/m²; and l-LV, 25mg/body), 1 of 6 patients had DLT (febrile neutropenia). At dose level 3 (CPT-11, 100mg/m²; 5-FU, 500mg/m²; and l-LV, 25mg/body), 2 of 6 patients had DLT (febrile neutropenia and grade 4 neutropenia lasting more than 4 days). To determine whether level 3 was the MTD level, an additional 3 patients were treated at this level, but no DLT was observed. Consequently, 2 of 9 patients had DLT at level 3, this level thus being considered as the RD. At this level, grade 3–4 neutropenia was common but manageable. Nonhematological toxicities were mild. Seven partial responses were observed in the 18 enrolled patients (response rate [RR], 39%), and 8 patients (44%) experienced stable disease.Conclusion This CPT-11/5-FU/l-LV regimen administered weekly for 3 weeks every 28 days has substantial antitumor activity, with manageable toxicities. A multicenter phase II study is currently underway.     

Imatinib plus low‐dose doxorubicin in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors refractory to high‐dose imatinib

BACKGROUND:

In KIT‐expressing Ewing sarcoma cell lines, the addition of doxorubicin to imatinib increases apoptosis, compared with imatinib or doxorubicin alone. On the basis of these in vitro data, the authors conducted a phase 1‐2 trial of doxorubicin with imatinib in patients with gastrointestinal sarcoma tumors refractory to high‐dose imatinib therapy.

METHODS:

Patients with metastatic gastrointestinal sarcoma tumor resistant to imatinib at 400 mg by mouth (p.o.) twice a day were eligible for this multicenter study, and received imatinib (400 mg p.o. every day [q.d.]) concomitantly with doxorubicin 15‐20 mg/m²/weekly for 4 cycles (monthly cycles), followed by imatinib (400 mg p.o. q.d.) maintenance in nonprogressive patients. Spiral computed tomography and positron emission tomography with F18‐fluorodeoxyglucose were done basally and after 2 months of therapy to evaluate response. An in vitro study assessed the effect of combining imatinib and doxorubicin.

RESULTS:

Twenty‐six patients with progressive gastrointestinal sarcoma tumor were entered in the study. Treatment was well tolerated. Three (14%) of 22 evaluable patients had partial responses per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, and 8 (36%) had clinical benefit (partial response or stable disease for ≥6 months). Median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 100 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 62‐138), and median survival was 390 days (95% CI, 264‐516). Interestingly, PFS was 211 days (95% CI, 52‐370) in patients with wild type (WT) KIT and 82 days (95% CI, 53‐111) in non‐WT patients (10 mutant, 6 not assessed). A synergistic effect on cell line proliferation and apoptosis was found with imatinib and doxorubicin combination.

CONCLUSIONS:

Low‐dose chemobiotherapy combination showed promising activity in heavily pretreated gastrointestinal sarcoma tumor patients, especially in those with WT‐KIT genotype. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

Phase I study of combination chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and nedaplatin (NDP): adverse effects and eecommended dose of NDP administered after 5-FU

When nedaplatin (NDP) was used as a single agent in the phase I study, the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was thrombocytopenia and the recommended dose (RD) was 100 mg/m2. However, the DLT, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and RD of NDP used in combination with 5-fluorouracil remained unknown. Therefore, we performed this study to assess the DLT and RD of NDP administered after 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). In this study, 5-FU was administered to 38 patients at a fixed dose (700 mg/m2/d on days 1-5) and NDP administered on day 6 at an initial dose of 80 mg/m2, which was subsequently increased to 100, 120, 130, 140, 150, and 160 mg/m2. The DLT of NDP was leukopenia and its MTD and RD were 160 and 150 mg/m2, respectively. Concerning impairment of renal function, only two patients had a grade I increase in serum creatinine. There were 19 responders (50%, 19/38) achieving partial response or complete response in the evaluation of antitumor effect. The result of this study is notable in that administration of 5-FU before NDP allows the dose of NDP to be substantially increased.     

卡培他滨二线治疗非小细胞肺癌的剂量递增研究

目的 探讨卡培他滨(capecitabine,CAPE)联合多西紫杉醇(docetaxel,TXT)二线治疗非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)时卡培他滨的最大耐受剂量(maximum-tolerated dose,MTD).方法 应用改良的Fibonacci法给予复治的NSCLC患者递增剂量的CAPE联合固定剂量TXT化疗,剂量Ⅰ(625 mg/m2,每天2次)和剂量Ⅱ(7 50 mg/m2,每天2次),两组1 8例患者共接受了67周期化疗.起始剂量为CAPE625 mg/m2,每天2次,d5～d18,TXT 30 mg/m2,d1,d8,每21天重复.如果没有剂量限制性毒性(dose limiting toxicity,DLT)出现,则升至下一剂量组,直至出现DLT.MTD定义为DLT出现的剂量水平的低一剂量.结果 主要的不良反应为粒细胞减少症、手足综合征、乏力和恶心.全组共5例发生8个DLT,剂量Ⅰ组1个(1例患者),剂量Ⅱ组7个(4例患者).由于在剂量Ⅱ组6例患者中4例出现了DLT,根据定义笔者确定剂量T为MTD.结论 此剂量递增试验的MTD是:卡培他滨1 250 mg/(m2·d)(625 mg/m2,每天2次)联合多西紫杉醇30mg/m2,d1,d8,每21天重复.复治NSCLC患者对此联合方案耐受性良好.     

Dose‐finding study of 153Sm‐EDTMP in patients with poor‐prognosis osteosarcoma

BACKGROUND:

Samarium‐153 ethylenediaminetetramethylene phosphonic acid (¹⁵³Sm‐EDTMP) has been used to treat patients with high‐risk osteosarcoma. The purpose of the current study was to determine the maximally tolerated dose of ¹⁵³Sm‐EDTMP that permits hematopoietic recovery within 6 weeks.

METHODS:

Patients with recurrent or refractory osteosarcoma with bone metastases were enrolled in this study. Subjects were treated with increasing doses of ¹⁵³Sm‐EDTMP, beginning with 1.0 millicuries (mCi)/kg and followed initially with 40% increment dose level escalations, using a continual reassessment method for dose escalation and de‐escalation with a target dose–limiting toxicity (DLT) rate of 30%. Complete blood counts were monitored weekly, and the primary DLT was defined as failure to achieve an absolute neutrophil count >750/mm³ and a platelet count >75,000/mm³ within 6 weeks of treatment. In addition to assessing toxicity, dosimetry measurements were made to estimate the radiation dose delivered to target lesions.

RESULTS:

The maximally tolerated dose of ¹⁵³Sm‐EDTMP was 44.8 megabecquerel (MBq)/kg (1.21 mCi/kg). DLTs were confined to hematologic toxicities, particularly delayed platelet recovery in 2 patients treated at a dose of 51.8 MBq/kg (1.4 mCi/kg). Grade 2 and 3 pulmonary toxicity (graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria [version 3.0]) as reported in 2 patients (at administered activities of 44.8 MBq/kg and 51.8 MBq/kg) was attributable to progressive pulmonary disease. No other significant nonhematologic toxicities were observed.

CONCLUSIONS:

Patients with osteosarcoma who have previously been heavily treated with chemotherapy can be safely administered ¹⁵³Sm‐EDTMP with rapid hematologic recovery. The data from the current study support the development of a future trial to assess the efficacy of combining targeted radiotherapy with cytotoxic chemotherapy as a treatment option for patients with high‐risk osteosarcoma. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.     

A phase 1 study of systemic ADH‐1 in combination with melphalan via isolated limb infusion in patients with locally advanced in‐transit malignant melanoma

BACKGROUND:

Isolated limb infusion with melphalan is a well‐tolerated treatment for patients with in‐transit extremity melanoma with an approximately 30% complete response (CR) rate. ADH‐1 is a cyclic pentapeptide that disrupts N‐cadherin adhesion complexes and when given systemically in a preclinical model of regional melphalan therapy demonstrated synergistic antitumor activity. A phase 1 dose escalation study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and antitumor activity of systemic ADH‐1 in combination with melphalan via isolated limb infusion in patients with in‐transit extremity melanoma was performed.

METHODS:

Dose escalation cohorts of 3 patients each received 1000, 2000, and 4000 mg (10 patients) of ADH‐1 administered intravenously on Days 1 and 8 with standard dose melphalan via isolated limb infusion on Day 1. N‐cadherin immunohistochemistry staining and quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis were performed on pretreatment tumor. Response was defined at 3 months using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors.

RESULTS:

Sixteen patients have been treated with no observed dose‐limiting toxicities. Common treatment‐related grade 1 or 2 toxicities included skin/dermatologic (n = 14) and pain (n = 12). Grade 3 toxicities included shortness of breath (n = 1), hypertension (n = 1), serologic toxicities (n = 4), and 1 grade 4 creatine phosphokinase elevation. In‐field responses included 8 CRs, 2 partial responses, 1 stable disease, and 5 progressive diseases. Pharmacokinetic analysis demonstrated increasing ADH‐1 concentrations at each dose and minimal variability in melphalan drug levels.

CONCLUSIONS:

Systemic ADH‐1 at a dose of 4000 mg on Days 1 and 8 in combination with melphalan via isolated limb infusion is a well‐tolerated, novel targeted therapy approach to regionally advanced melanoma. The number of CRs exceeded expectations, suggesting that targeting N‐cadherin may be a new strategy for overcoming melanoma chemoresistance. Cancer 2009. © 2009 American Cancer Society.     

Capecitabine and oral cyclophosphamide: A novel oral treatment combination for advanced cancer

Background: This dose escalation study assessed feasibility of a totally oral chemotherapy regimen using cyclophosphamide and capecitabine. The rationale for this combination was based on the observation that preclinical models of cyclophosphamide up‐regulated tumor thymidine phosphorylase and increased the activation of capecitabine. Methods: Eligible patients with advanced cancer were treated with oral cyclophosphamide and capecitabine on a 28‐day cycle. If no dose limiting toxicities (DLT) were encountered during the first two treatment cycles, the next patient group was assigned to the next highest dose level until the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) was determined. Results: Twenty‐seven patients entered treatment. The majority of non‐DLT were grades 1 and 2. DLT experienced in the first 8‐week observation period were grade 3 diarrhea (one patient, level III) and grade 3 emesis (two patients, level V). MTD was observed at level 5, 1331 mg/m²/day capecitabine days 1–28 with 125 mg/m²/day cyclophosphamide days 1–14 of the 28‐day cycle. The recommended phase II dose is therefore 1331 mg/m²/day capecitabine with 100 mg/m²/day cyclophosphamide. The best response evaluation showed four partial responses (breast, colon, ovary and pancreas). Conclusion: Cyclophosphamide and capecitabine can be combined at their full oral single agent dose with promising tolerability and activity.     

Phase I/II clinical trial of induction chemotherapy with nedaplatin (CDGP), docetaxel (DOC) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) for squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck

In a phase I study, we determined the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended dose (RD) of nedaplatin (CDGP) in combination chemotherapy with Docetaxel (DOC) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) for treatment of carcinoma of the head and neck. Then, in a phase II study, we examined the efficacy and safety of the RD of chemotherapy. Fresh patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were enrolled in the study. The dosage of chemotherapy was as follows: DOC 60 mg/m(2) on day 1 by infusion over 2 hours; CDGP 20-30 mg/m(2)/day on day 1 to 5 by infusion over 1 hour, and 5-FU 600 mg/m(2)/day on day 1 to 5 by 5 days continuous infusion. For CDGP, an initial dose level was set at 20 mg/m(2), and 3 patients were enrolled for each level of dose escalation. The DLT was defined here as grade 4 neutropenia or grade> or =3 non-hematotoxic reactions. The dose at which DLT was observed in overall 33% cases was taken as MTD. The RD for phase II study was estimated to be DOC 60 mg/m(2), CDGP 20 mg/m(2)/day, 5-FU 600 mg/m(2)/day. Forty patients were enrolled in the phase II study. DLT of neutropenia was noted in 2 of 38 cases. DLT of non-hematotoxic reactions was found in less than 33% of the cases; 17 cases showed CR, and 12 cases showed PR. The response rate was 76.3%. The overall response rate in histological assessment was 55.3%. The combination chemotherapy with Low-Divided Dose of CDGP, DOC and 5-FU was suggested to be safe and effective.     

A phase I study to determine the safety,pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a dual VEGFR and FGFR inhibitor,brivanib, in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors

BackgroundThis study was designed to determine the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of brivanib in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors.Patients and methodsNinety patients enrolled in this two-part, phase I open-label study of oral brivanib alaninate. The primary objectives of this study were (in part A) dose-limiting toxicity, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the lowest biologically active dose level and (in part B) the optimal dose/dose range. The secondary objectives of this study were preliminary evidence of antitumor activity, PK and PD.ResultsAcross part A (open-label dose escalation and MTD) and part B (open-label dose optimization), 68 patients received brivanib alaninate. Brivanib demonstrated a manageable toxicity profile at doses of 180–800 mg. Most toxic effects were mild. Systemic exposure of the active moiety brivanib increased linearly ≤1000 mg/day. The MTD was 800 mg/day. Forty-four patients were treated at the MTD: 20 with 800 mg continuously, 11 with 800 mg intermittently and 13 with 400 mg b.i.d. doses. Partial responses were confirmed in two patients receiving brivanib ≥600 mg. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated statistically significant decreases in parameters reflecting tumor vascularity and permeability after multiple doses in the 800-mg continuous q.d. and 400-mg b.i.d. dose cohorts.ConclusionIn patients with advanced/metastatic cancer, brivanib demonstrates promising antiangiogenic and antitumor activity and manageable toxicity at doses ≤800 mg orally q.d., the recommended phase II study dose.