Bonding quality of contemporary dental cements to sandblasted esthetic crown copings*

Aim: To evaluate the shear bond strength of current luting cements to sandblasted crown‐coping substrates. Methods: Specimens of nickel‐chromium, pressable glass ceramic, and zirconia crown‐coping substrates were sandblasted in three groups (n = 30 each) with 50 (group 1), 110 (group 2), and 250 μm (group 3) alumina particles at a pressure of 250 kPa. Cylinders of glass ionomer, universal resin, and self‐adhesive resin cements were then built up on the sandblasted substrate surfaces of each group (n = 10). All bonded specimens were stressed to evaluate the cement–substrate shear bond strength. Both the mode and incidence of bond failure were also considered. Results: No difference was noticed between all test groups in terms of cement–substrate bond strength. In comparison to self‐adhesive type, the universal resin cement provided lower bond strengths to both metal and glass–ceramic substrates in group 1. The self‐adhesive resin cement provided the highest bond strengths to the zirconia substrates in groups 2 and 3. The adhesive type of bond failure was common in the metal and zirconia substrates in all groups. Conclusions: Cement–substrate bonding quality is not affected by the size of sandblasting particles. Resin cements bond better to different coping substrates. Self‐adhesive resin cement is the best choice to bond zirconia‐based substrates.     

Effect of thermocycling on bond strength of luting cements to zirconia ceramic.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strength of different cements to densely sintered zirconia ceramic after aging by thermocycling. METHODS: The following luting cements for bonding ZrO2-TZP (tetragonal zirconia polycrystals) were used in this study: Ketac-Cem, Nexus, Rely X Unicem, Superbond C&B, Panavia F, and Panavia 21. Groups of 30 test specimens were prepared by bonding stainless steel cylinders tribochemically silica-coated with the Rocatec-system to sandblasted ZrO2-TZP ceramic disks (cercon smart ceramics). Prior to testing all bonded specimens were stored in distilled water (37 degrees C) for 48 h and half of them (n=15) were additionally aged by thermocycling (10,000 times). RESULTS: None of the fractures occurred at the interface of the metallic rods. The assemblies failed either at the interface between the ceramic surface and the cements or within the cements. Thermocycling affected the bond strength of all luting cements studied except for both Panavia materials and Rely X Unicem. SIGNIFICANCE: Within the limits of this in vitro study the results showed that-after thermocycling-bond strengths for Ketac-Cem and Nexus were quite low. Nexus in combination with tribochemical silica-coating of ceramic surface produced a higher bond strength. The four adhesive resin cements (Rely X Unicem, Superbond C&B, Panavia F, and Panavia 21) gave superior results. The strongest bond to zirconia was obtained with Panavia 21.     

The effect of preparation order on the crystal structure of yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal and the shear bond strength of dental resin cements

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of preparation order on the crystal structure of yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (Y-TZP) and the shear bond strength of dental resin cements.

Methods

One-hundred fifty pre-sintered Y-TZP cylinders (Ø 9 mm × 13.5 mm) were prepared and divided into three groups (control group, SBS group and SAS group). Specimens in control group were not treated. Specimens in SBS group were sandblasted and then densely sintered, and specimens in SAS group were sintered in advance, and then sandblasted. The specimens were analyzed by X-ray diffractometry, confocal laser scanning microscopy and Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy before and after sandblasting. All specimens were embedded in polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) molds using PMMA and each group was divided into five subgroups. The mixed resin cements (Clearfil SA luting cement, Zirconite, Superbond C&B, Rely-X Unicem, and Multilink) were placed onto the Y-TZP surfaces using PTFE molds with Ø 3 mm × 3 mm, followed by storage in distilled water at 37 °C for 24 h, and thermocycling (5000 cycles at 5 °C and 55 °C with a 30 s dwelling time). All specimens were tested for the shear bond strengths with a universal testing machine, and fractured surfaces were evaluated by SEM. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA and Scheffé comparison with α = .05.

Results

Sandblasting of the zirconia significantly increased shear bond strength of resin cements, but the preparation order had no significant influence on the shear bond strength in both test groups. In SEM observation, the natures of the surface faceting of the zirconia grains were totally different between SBS and SAS groups. SBS group exhibited less monoclinic structures than SAS group.

Significance

Sandblasting of pre-sintered Y-TZP and then sintering may induce favorable proportion of tetragonal structures. This might have positive effect on the clinical performance of zirconia restorations.     

Dentin bonding of cements. The bonding of cements with dentin in combination with various indirect restorative materials

The number of both luting agents and restorative materials available on the market has rapidly increased. This study compared various types of luting agents when used to bond different indirect, laboratory restorative materials to dentin. Cylinders were produced of six restorative materials (gold alloy, titanium, feldspathic porcelain, leucite-glass ceramic, zirconia, and an indirect resin composite). Following relevant pretreatment, the end surface of the cylinders were luted to ground, human dentin with eight different luting agents (DeTrey Zinc [zinc phosphate cement], Fuji I [conventional glass ionomer cement], Fuji Plus [resin-modified glass ionomer cement], Variolink II [conventional etch-and-rinse resin cement], Panavia F2.0 and Multilink [self-etch resin cements], RelyX Unicem Aplicap and Maxcem [self-adhesive resin cements]). After water storage at 37 °C for one week, the shear bond strength of the specimens was measured and the fracture mode was examined stereo-microscopically. Restorative material and luting agent both had a significant effect on bond strength and there was a significant interaction between the two variables. The zinc phosphate cement and the glass ionomer cements resulted in the lowest bond strengths, whereas the highest bond strengths were found with the two self-etch and one of the self-adhesive resin cements.     

Effect of priming agents on shear bond strengths of resin-based luting agents to a translucent zirconia material

Purpose

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effect of priming agents and artificial aging with thermocycling on shear bond strengths of two resin-based luting agents to a translucent zirconia material.

In vitro comparative bond strength of contemporary self-adhesive resin cements to zirconium oxide ceramic with and without air-particle abrasion

This study compared shear bond strengths of six self-adhesive resin cements to zirconium oxide ceramic with and without air-particle abrasion. One hundred twenty zirconia samples were air-abraded (group SB; n = 60) or left untreated (group NO). Composite cylinders were bonded to the zirconia samples with either BisCem (BC), Maxcem (MC), G-Cem (GC), RelyX Unicem Clicker (RUC), RelyX Unicem Applicator (RUA), or Clearfil SA Cement (CSA). Shear bond strength was tested after thermocycling, and data were analyzed with analysis of variance and Holm–Sidak pairwise comparisons. Without abrasion, RUA (8.0 MPa), GC (7.9 MPa), and CSA (7.6 MPa) revealed significantly higher bond strengths than the other cements. Air-particle abrasion increased bond strengths for all test cements (p < 0.001). GC (22.4 MPa) and CSA (18.4 MPa) revealed the highest bond strengths in group SB. Bond strengths of self-adhesive resin cements to zirconia were increased by air-particle abrasion. Cements containing adhesive monomers (MDP/4-META) were superior to other compositions.     

Bond strength of three luting agents to zirconia ceramic - influence of surface treatment and thermocycling

Objective

This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the influence of different surface treatments, 3 luting agents and thermocycling on microtensile bond strength (µTBS) to zirconia ceramic.

Material and Methods

A total of 18 blocks (5x5x4 mm) were fabricated from zirconia ceramic (ICE Zirkonia) and duplicated into composite blocks (Alphadent). Ceramic blocks were divided into 3 groups (n=6) according to the following surface treatments: airborne-particle abrasion (AA), silica-coating, (SC) (CoJet) and silica coating followed by silane application (SCSI) (ESPE Sil). Each group was divided into 3 subgroups (n=2) according to the 3 luting agents used. Resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RMGIC, Ketac Cem Plus), self-adhesive resin cement (UN, RelyX Unicem) and adhesive resin cement (ML, MultiLink Automix) were used for bonding composite and zirconia blocks. Each bonding assembly was cut into microbars (10 mm long and 1±0.1 mm²). Seven specimens of each subgroup were stored in water bath at 37ºC for 1 week. The o ther 7 specimens were stored in water bath at 37ºC for 30 days then thermocycled (TC) for 7,500 cycles. µTBS values were recorded for each specimen using a universal testing machine. Statistical analyses were performed using a 3-way ANOVA model followed by serial 1-way ANOVAs. Comparison of means was performed with Tukey''s HSD test at (α=0.05).

Results

µTBS ranged from 16.8 to 31.8 MPa after 1 week and from 7.3 to 16.4 MPa after 30 days of storage in water and thermocycling. Artificial aging significantly decreased µTBS (p<0.05). Considering surface treatment, SCSI significantly increased µTBS (p<0.05) compared to SC and AA. Resin cements (UN and ML) demonstrated significantly higher µTBS (p<0.05) compared to RMGIC cement.

Conclusions

Silica coating followed by silane application together with adhesive resin cements significantly increased µTBS, while thermocycling significantly decreased µTBS.     

Effect acidic and alkaline/heat treatments on the bond strength of different luting cements to commercially pure titanium

Objective

The purpose of this study was to characterize the effects of either acidic or combined alkaline/heat treatments on the surface of grit-blasted commercially pure (cp) titanium. The effects of the previous treatments on the shear bond strength (SBS) of cp titanium to conventional glass ionomer, resin-reinforced glass ionomer and self-adhesive resin luting cements were evaluated.

Methods

Titanium discs were machined and received one of the following treatments; grit-blasting (GB), grit-blasting followed either by etching in HNO₃/HF solution (GB/Ac) or by combined 5 M NaOH treatment/heat treatment at 600 °C for 1 h, then immersed for 24 h in SBF solution before cementation (GB/Ak). The treated surfaces were characterized by atomic force microscope (AFM), scanning electron microscope (SEM) and laser-induced brake-down spectroscopy (LIBS). Discs were cemented either by Fuji I, Fuji Plus or Rely X™ Unicem luting cements. The SBS was evaluated and the debonded discs were investigated by SEM.

Results

Two prominent results were revealed; first, GB/Ak treatment showed the highest SBS than the other treatments (P < 0.0001). Second, Rely X™ Unicem showed the highest SBS than the other cements (P < 0.0001). Fuji I and Fuji Plus showed predominant cohesive type of failure, whereas Rely X™ showed predominant adhesive type of failure.

Significance

Combined alkaline/heat treatments of commercially pure titanium surface shows to be of beneficial effect in enhancing SBS to glass ionomer, resin-modified glass ionomer and adhesive resin luting cements.     

不同表面处理和不同粘结剂对氧化锆粘结强度的影响

目的探讨不同表面处理和不同粘结剂对氧化锆粘结强度的影响。方法将氧化锆分别制成直径为12.0mm和4.0mm的瓷片,各120个,分别随机分成12组。粘结剂选用磷酸锌粘结剂、聚羧酸锌粘结剂、BifixQM和Super-Bond CB。对氧化锆的表面分别进行不处理、喷砂、硅烷化、先喷砂后硅烷化处理。用上述4种粘结剂将4.0mm瓷片粘结在12.0mm瓷片上,置于37℃蒸馏水中保存24h后,进行剪切粘结强度测试。结果粘结剂相同时,不同表面处理时的粘结强度有显著统计学差异(P0.01),由小到大依次为不处理喷砂硅烷化先喷砂后硅烷化处理;表面处理相同时,不同粘结剂之间的粘结强度有显著统计学差异(P0.01),由小到大依次为磷酸锌粘结剂聚羧酸锌粘结剂Bifix QMSuper-Bond CB。结论粘结剂相同时,表面处理提高了粘结强度。Super-Bond CB的粘结强度比较理想。使用Super-Bond CB时,喷砂后硅烷化处理是一种比较理想的表面处理方法。     

Retentive strength of implant-supported CAD-CAM lithium disilicate crowns on zirconia custom abutments using 6 different cements

Statement of problem

The optimal retention of implant-supported ceramic crowns on zirconia abutments is a goal of prosthodontic treatment.

Do chlorhexidine and ethanol improve bond strength and durability of adhesion of fiber posts inside the root canal?

Objectives

The aim was to investigate the effects of chlorhexidine and ethanol pretreatment of the root canal on push-out bond strengths and durability of adhesion of fiber posts luted with two different adhesive strategies.

Materials and methods

One hundred twenty human anterior teeth were endodontically treated. After post space preparation, the root canals were irrigated using 1 % sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) applied with passive ultrasonic irrigation followed by distilled water (control). In pretreatment (PT) group, chlorhexidine (CHX) root canals were irrigated using 2 % chlorhexidine; and in the PT group, 99 % ethanol was used prior application of the luting agent. Two different post-and-luting systems with an etch-and-rinse (CX) adhesive approach (n?=?60) and a self-adhesive resin cement (RX; n?=?60) were inserted into the root canals. Bond strengths were evaluated initially and after thermocycling and storage for 6 months using push-out tests.

Results

Bond strength was significantly affected by the adhesive strategy (p?<?0.0005), the pretreatment (p?<?0.0005) and the location inside the root canal (p?<?0.0005; repeated measurement ANOVA). Ethanol significantly increased bond strengths irrespective of the luting agent used compared to the control and CHX group (p?<?0.05; Tukey's B).

Conclusion

Ethanol significantly increased bond strength of the CX and the RX system inside the root canal and could be recommended as a final rinse for luting fiber posts using an ethanol-based etch-and-rinse adhesive system or self-adhesive resin cement.

Clinical relevance

PT of the root canal using ethanol seems to facilitate adhesive luting of fiber posts with the tested adhesive system and luting cements.     

Effect of surface contamination on adhesive bonding of cast pure titanium and Ti-6Al-4V alloy

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: There is little information regarding bond strengths of resin cements to cast titanium surfaces contaminated by investment material. PURPOSE: This study examined the effect of surface contamination on the shear bond strength of resin cements to cast titanium and Ti-6Al-4V alloy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two types of disks were cast from commercially pure titanium (CP-Ti) and Ti-6Al-4V alloy ingots using an argon-arc pressure casting unit and a phosphate-bonded Al2 O3 /LiAlSiO6 investment. After casting, disks were subjected to 3 surface treatments: (1) cast surface sandblasted (50 microm-sized Al2 O3 ) for 30 seconds; (2) metal surface sanded with silicon-carbide paper (600 grit) after grinding the contaminated cast surface (approximately 200 microm in thickness); and (3) metal surface sandblasted for 30 seconds after treatment 2. Surface structures were examined after each treatment with SEM and optical microscopy. Each type of disk was then bonded with 2 types of luting materials. Bonded specimens were subjected to thermocycling for up to 50,000 cycles, and shear bond strengths were determined after 0 (baseline) and 50,000 thermocycles. Results were statistically analyzed with 3-way ANOVA (P <.05). RESULTS: Microscopic observation of cast CP-Ti and Ti-6Al-4V exhibited noticeable structures on the cast surfaces apparently contaminated with investment material. However, there were no statistical differences (P >.05) in the bond strengths of both cements between contaminated (treatment 1) and uncontaminated surfaces (treatment 3) for both metals at baseline and after 50,000 thermocycles. The bond strength of specimens sanded with silicon-carbide paper (treatment 2) deteriorated dramatically after 50,000 thermocycles. CONCLUSIONS: Contamination of the cast metal surfaces by elements of the investment during casting did not affect bond strengths of the luting materials to CP-Ti and Ti-6Al-4V.     

Bonding between resin luting cement and glass infiltrated alumina-reinforced ceramics with silane coupling agent

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the shear bond strengths of three dual-cured resin luting cements (Linkmax HV, Panavia Fluoro Cement, and RelyX ARC) to glass-infiltrated alumina-reinforced ceramic material and the effect of four silane coupling agents (Clearfil Porcelain Bond, GC Ceramic Primer, Porcelain LinerM, and Tokuso Ceramic Primer) on the bond strength. The two type-shaped of In-Ceram alumina ceramic glass-infiltrated specimens were untreated or treated with one of the four ceramic primers and then cemented together with one of the three dual-cured resin luting cements. Half of the specimens were stored in water at 37 degrees C for 24 h and the other half thermocycled 20,000 times before shear bond strength testing. Surface treatment by all silane coupling agents improved the shear bond strength compared with non-treatment. The specimens treated with Clearfil Porcelain Bond showed significantly greater shear bond strength than any of the other three silane coupling agents regardless of resin luting cements and thermocycling except for the use of Panavia Fluoro Cement at 20,000 thermocycles. When the alumina-reinforced ceramic material was treated with any silane coupling agent except GC Ceramic Primer and cemented with Linkmax HV, no significant differences in bond strength were noted between after water storage and after 20,000 thermocycles. After 20,000 thermocycles, all specimens except for the combined use of Clearfil Porcelain Bond or GC Ceramic Primer and Linkmax HV and GC Ceramic Primer and Panavia Fluoro Cement showed adhesive failures at the ceramic-resin luting cement interface.     

Adhesion of different brands of glass ionomer cements to a ceramometal alloy

Aims

The aim of the study was to assess, compare and evaluate the adhesive strength and compressive strength of different brands of glass ionomer cements to a ceramometal alloy.

Materials

(A) Glass ionomer cements: GC Fuji II - GC Corporation, Tokyo; Chem Flex — Dentsply DeTrey, Germany; Glass ionomer FX — Shofu-11, Japan; MR dental — MR Dental Suppliers Pvt. Ltd., England; (B) ceramometal alloy — Ugirex III; (C) cold cure acrylic resin; (E) temperature cum humidity control chamber; and (F) Instron universal testing machine.

Methods

Four different types of glass ionomer cements were used in the study. From each type of the glass ionomer cements, 15 specimens were made to evaluate the compressive strength and adhesive strength, respectively. Fifteen specimens were further divided into 3 subgroups each having 5 specimens. For compressive strength, specimens were tested at 2, 4 and 12 hours by using Instron universal testing machine. To evaluate the adhesive strength, specimens were surface treated with diamond bur, silicone carbide bur and sandblasting, and tested under Instron universal testing machine.

Results and conclusions

It was concluded from the study that the compressive strength as well as the adhesive bond strength of MR dental glass ionomer cement with a ceramometal alloy was found to be maximum compare to other glass ionomer cements. Sandblasting surface treatment of ceramometal alloy was found to be comparatively more effective for adhesive bond strength between alloy and glass ionomer cement.     

Bond strength of luting cements to zirconium oxide ceramics

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to determine the bond strength of some resin luting cements to zirconia ceramic. The hypothesis was that adhesive bonding capacity is influenced by different surface pretreatments designed for milled ceramic inlays. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Composite cylinders 5 mm x 5 mm were light cured on the ceramic surfaces for a shear test conducted in a test jig. Five surface treatments were studied: as received (from the milling machine), sandblasting with either 250- or 50-micron alumina sand, hydrofluoric acid treatment, and grinding with diamond burs. The tested luting cements were Panavia 21, Twinlook, and Superbond C&B. RESULTS: All debonding occurred at the interface between ceramic and composite cement. Superbond demonstrated the highest bond strength regardless of the surface treatments. Grinding the surface with diamond burs improved the bonding slightly for Twinlook and Panavia 21 and also showed the roughest texture. Washing with hydrofluoric acid had no significant influence on bond strength. CONCLUSION: Bond strengths for Twinlook and Pananvia 21 were quite low, and only Superbond showed a bond strength reasonably acceptable for clinical use; however, as no standard for bond strength has been established for inlay therapy, the other cements cannot be rejected as luting cements for inlays.     

底涂剂的化学处理对二氧化锆陶瓷树脂粘接效果的影响

目的 评估专用底涂剂的化学处理对二氧化锆陶瓷与自粘接型树脂水门汀间粘接效果的影响。方法 2.5 mm厚可切削二氧化锆陶瓷片（Vita InceramYZ）经烧结、研磨、清洗后,一半的陶瓷试件表面在0.3 MPa压力下接受50 μm Al2O3颗粒喷砂处理20 s。使用X射线荧光光谱仪对研磨和喷砂组的陶瓷表面成分进行定性定量分析。研磨和喷砂组的陶瓷片各分为2组：一组直接与自粘接型树脂水门汀（Biscem）进行粘接,另一组经底涂剂（Z Primer Plus）处理后与Biscem进行粘接。各实验组试件再分为两个亚组（n=10）经0、10000次冷热循环后接受剪切粘接 强度测量。使用多因素方差分析对数据进行统计。结果 喷砂后的陶瓷表面会有质量比为8.27%的Al2O3颗粒附着。 与喷砂处理相比,底涂剂处理对冷热循环前粘接强度的提高更加显著。冷热循环前后,未经过底涂剂处理的陶瓷与 树脂间粘接强度的差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）,但经过底涂剂处理后陶瓷与树脂间粘接强度的差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论 底涂剂的化学处理能够显著提高二氧化锆陶瓷与自粘接型树脂水门汀的初期粘接强度,但在耐 久实验条件下其粘接界面不稳定,会出现快速老化。     

Bonding of restorative materials to dentin with various luting agents

The aim was to compare eight types of luting agents when used to bond six indirect, laboratory restorative materials to dentin. Cylinders of the six restorative materials (Esteticor Avenir [gold alloy], Tritan [titanium], NobelRondo [feldspathic porcelain], Finesse All-Ceramic [leucite-glass ceramic], Lava [zirconia], and Sinfony [resin composite]) were ground and air-abraded. Cylinders of feldspathic porcelain and glass ceramic were additionally etched with hydrofluoric acid and were silane-treated. The cylinders were luted to ground human dentin with eight luting agents (DeTrey Zinc [zinc phosphate cement], Fuji I [conventional glass ionomer cement], Fuji Plus [resin-modified glass ionomer cement], Variolink II [conventional etch-and-rinse resin cement], Panavia F2.0 and Multilink [self-etch resin cements], and RelyX Unicem Aplicap and Maxcem [self-adhesive resin cements]). After water storage at 37°C for one week, the shear bond strength of the specimens (n=8/group) was measured, and the fracture mode was stereomicroscopically examined. Bond strength data were analyzed with two-factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Newman-Keuls' Multiple Range Test (α=0.05). Both the restorative material and the luting agent had a significant effect on bond strength, and significant interaction was noted between the two variables. Zinc phosphate cement and glass ionomer cements produced the lowest bond strengths, whereas the highest bond strengths were found with the two self-etch and one of the self-adhesive resin cements. Generally, the fracture mode varied markedly with the restorative material. The luting agents had a bigger influence on bond strength between restorative materials and dentin than was seen with the restorative material.     

Influence of cement type and ceramic primer on retention of polymer-infiltrated ceramic crowns to a one-piece zirconia implant

Statement of problem

The best procedure for cementing a restoration to zirconia implants has not yet been established.

Aspects of bonding between resin luting cements and glass ceramic materials

Objectives

The bonding interface of glass ceramics and resin luting cements plays an important role in the long-term durability of ceramic restorations. The purpose of this systematic review is to discuss the various factors involved with the bond between glass ceramics and resin luting cements.

Methods

An electronic Pubmed, Medline and Embase search was conducted to obtain laboratory studies on resin–ceramic bonding published in English and Chinese between 1972 and 2012.

Results and discussion

Eighty-three articles were included in this review. Various factors that have a possible impact on the bond between glass ceramics and resin cements were discussed, including ceramic type, ceramic crystal structure, resin luting cements, light curing, surface treatments, and laboratory test methodology.

Conclusions

Resin–ceramic bonding has been improved substantially in the past few years. Hydrofluoric acid (HF) etching followed by silanizaiton has become the most widely accepted surface treatment for glass ceramics. However, further studies need to be undertaken to improve surface preparations without HF because of its toxicity. Laboratory test methods are also required to better simulate the actual oral environment for more clinically compatible testing.     

极固宁对水门汀与牙本质间剪切强度的影响

目的：评价极固宁脱敏剂对5种水门汀剪切强度的影响。方法：收集双尖牙30颗。包埋牙齿,暴露牙本质面,用水砂纸打磨牙本质面。所有牙齿被分为实验组和对照组。实验组的牙本质面首先用极固宁脱敏处理,然后分别用5种水门汀将树脂小柱粘在牙本质表面。对照组的牙本质不涂脱敏剂,使用前述提到的水门汀粘固树脂小柱。所有试样放在37℃水浴中浸泡24h后测量剪切强度。结果：极固宁脱敏剂没有显著降低聚羧酸锌水门汀和玻璃离子水门汀的剪切强度,但却会使磷酸锌水门汀的剪切强度大幅下降。极固宁也使树脂加强玻璃离子水门汀和树脂水门汀的粘接强度下降。结论：极固宁对磷酸锌水门汀、树脂加强玻璃离子水门汀、树脂水门汀与牙本质间粘接强度有不利影响,对聚羧酸锌水门汀和玻璃离子水门汀与牙本质间粘接强度无不利影响。