Comparative study of leg wound skin closure in coronary artery bypass graft operations.

A prospective randomised study of four different methods of leg wound skin closure after removal of the long saphenous vein was carried out in 113 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. These methods were: (1) continuous nylon vertical mattress suture (27 patients); (2) continuous subcuticular absorbable (Dexon) suture (29 patients); (3) metal skin staples (Autosuture) (27 patients); and (4) adhesive sutureless skin closure ("Op-site") (30 patients). All wounds were examined by two independent observers at five, 10, and 45 days after operation. At five days, inflammation, extent of oedema, discharge, and infection were assessed. At 10 days attention was paid to the state of wound healing and at 45 days to the final cosmetic appearance. The use of continuous subcuticular suture resulted in significantly less discharge than did the use of metal staples, nylon vertical mattress suture, or Op-site. The incidence of established wound infection was 4.5% overall, with no infection in the wounds closed with Dexon. Assessment of the healing process showed subcuticular Dexon to be more effective than metal staples or vertical mattress nylon suture. The final cosmetic result showed continuous subcuticular suture to be superior to nylon vertical mattress suture and skin staples but as effective as Op-site sutureless skin closure.     

The use of sterile adhesive tape in the closure of arthroscopic puncture wounds: a comparison with a single layer nylon closure.

A prospective trial was undertaken comparing the wound healing and infection rates in arthroscopic arthrotomy wounds closed by sterile adhesive tapes on interrupted Nylon skin sutures. Two hundred and thirty consecutive arthroscopic procedures had arthrotomy wounds closed by a single layer skin closure of either interrupted Nylon (n = 62) or sterile adhesive tapes (n = 168). All wounds healed by primary intention. Only one wound developed a superficial infection around a Nylon suture and no patient developed a synovial herniation. It is concluded that closure of arthroscopic puncture wounds with sterile adhesive tape is effective and convenient for wound management.     

A revolutionary advance in skin closure compared to current methods

Six pigs were used to evaluate the influence of three separate modalities on contaminated wounds. Full-thickness skin wounds on the abdomen were contaminated with 10(4) or 10(5) Staphylococcus aureus and then closed with one of three methods. The three closure modalities included (1) a new absorbable staple (Insorb) placed in the subcuticular tissue, (2) a braided Vicryl suture, and (3) percutaneous metal staples. Any foreign body material implanted in tissue increases the risk of infection at that site. Wound closure always involves the use of a foreign body. Historically, sutures have been the primary material used to close tissue. The newer synthetic sutures are significangly more biodegradable and cause less infection than sutures composed of protein, such as silk and catgut. Metal staples are also associated with a low risk of infection. Recently, Incisive Surgical, Inc. (Plymouth, Minnesota) has developed an absorbable polymer staple specifically for subcuticular skin closure. The purpose of this study was to compare the new Insorb staple to both an absorbable polymer suture and a metal staple. Wound infection was assessed 7 days after closure by clinical signs and quantitative bacterial swabs. The results demonstrated that wounds closed with Insorb staples had the lowest incidence (33%) of infection, followed by percutaneous metal staples (44%). All wounds (100%) closed with Vicryl suture became infected. The incidence of wound infection directly correlated with the level of quantitative bacterial count at analysis. The Insorb staple was associated with significantly reduced closure time, less inflammation and infection, and better aesthetic result compared to Vicryl. Compared to metal staples, the Insorb subcuticular staplers demonstrated comparable closure time without the need for later staple removal. In conclusion, the closure of contaminated wounds with the Insorb staples is a superior choice to Vicryl suture because they have a significantly (p = 0.009) lower incidence of infection. The Insorb staple is a revolutionary advance in subcuticular skin stapling.     

Staples or sutures for chest and leg wounds following cardiovascular surgery

A best evidence topic in cardiovascular surgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question asked was whether the use of skin sutures or skin staples for chest and leg wounds in patients following cardiovascular surgery reduces the incidence of wound infections. Altogether 119 abstracts were found using the reported search, of which five randomized controlled trials, represented the best evidence on this topic. The author, journal, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes, results and study weaknesses were tabulated. We concluded in the five randomized controlled trials in cardiovascular surgery that compared staples with suture closure, three out of five found that the complication rate was lower with sutures and the other two found no difference. With regard to cosmesis, two of the five studies found sutures to be superior and the remaining papers found no difference. We conclude that sutured skin closure for leg and chest wounds is superior to stapled closure.     

Comparing wound complication rates following closure of hip wounds with metallic skin staples or subcuticular vicryl suture: a prospective randomised trial

PURPOSE: To compare 2 methods of wound closure-metallic staples or 3-0 undyed vicryl-according to postoperative wound complication rates. METHODS: Patients who underwent surgery for proximal femoral fractures were randomised to have wound closure with metallic staples or with subcuticular vicryl suture. Wounds were regularly examined postoperatively and only those with positive wound swabs were regarded as wound infections. RESULTS: Five infections and one superficial wound dehiscence occurred in the patients who had wound closure with metallic staples. The complication rate was significantly higher for this group compared with the group who had wound closure with subcuticular vicryl suture (p<0.025). CONCLUSION: Superficial wound complication rates are higher for wounds closed with metallic staples compared to wounds closed with subcuticular vicryl.     

Scientific basis for selecting staple and tape skin closures

Use of tape and skin staples has many important clinical applications for surgical wounds. During the past two decades, our research program has identified the optimal performance parameters of these wound closure devices. On the basis of their unique performance characteristics, specific staplers and tapes are recommended for wound closure. The scientific basis for selecting staples and tapes for wound closure is based on their influences on the biology of wound repair and infection.     

Staples for wound closure: a controlled trial.

Skin staples were compared with two conventional suture methods for speed, convenience, effectiveness and cost. One hundred and ninety-five patients having linear abdominal incisions were randomly allocated to one of three methods of interrupted skin closure--polypropylene sutures, polyglactin sutures or stainless steel staples and the wounds were assessed over 30 days. The mean rate of wound closure using sutures was 4.2 cm per minute while staples were faster at 22.5 cm per minute and saved an average of three minutes per wound. The time saved was considerably greater with long incisions. Staples cost 50p more per 15 cm wound than either suture. In other respects the three methods were comparable except that polyglactin caused the least wound pain. We believe the advantages of speed and convenience of skin staples outweigh the extra cost, provided the disposable instruments are reused until empty.     

Staples versus sutures in the closure of scalp wounds: a prospective, double-blind, randomized trial

Over a 6-month period, patients attending the Accident and Emergency Department of the Mater Infirmorum Hospital with scalp wounds were randomly allocated to one of two groups for closure of their wounds with either nylon sutures or metal staples. Each group contained 100 patients. Patients were reviewed at 5 days (95 per cent) after the removal of sutures or staples and again at 3 weeks (61 per cent). The two groups were similar for age, sex, aetiology and wound characteristics. There was no difference in morbidity or rate of wound infection but stapling was significantly faster and less painful. The use of staples carries no risk of accidental needle-stick injury and should therefore be safer than suturing for the user.     

SINGLE LAYER ABDOMINAL WOUND CLOSURE IN CHILDREN

A single layer closure of abdominal incisions was done, including the skin, musculo-aponeurotic layer and peritoneum, with a modified‘figure-of-eight’technique, using thick monofilament nylon interrupted sutures. This technique leaves no suture material in the wound after suture removal on the 14th postoperative day. One hundred and fifty-two transverse incisions of the abdomen in children of all ages were analysed. Easy closure in difficult cases, no wound dehiscence and a greatly reduced infection rate are the advantages. We recommend this technique as a routine, particularly in poor risk patients, contaminated wounds and closure of colostomy wounds.     

Stapler suture or single button suture? A controlled clinical study on the comparison of both skin closure methods

In a controlled randomized clinical trial, skin closure with a skin-stapling technique was compared with interrupted sutures on 50 patients (26 sutured and 24 stapled). The two groups were similar in all important respects. The clinical side of the study was to compare 1) the cosmetic results, 2) the time taken to close the skin, and 3) advantages and disadvantages of the two techniques by a questionnaire completed by the clinical staff. The study suggested a cosmetic advantage for the stapling when the results at 6th postop. week were compared. The only significant difference was in cross hatching (22 out of 26 sutured wounds but none of the 24 stapled) which was predominantly visible in sutured wounds. A clear difference was found in operating time. Skin closure with interrupted sutures took 310s, compared with 122s for stapling (alpha = 0,001). Similarly time required to remove the closure material was less with the staples than with sutures. Staples are more expensive than sutures. However the advantage of the staples over the suture in avoiding cross hatching is significant as well as time saving.     

Wound infection following high saphenous ligation. A trial comparing two skin closure techniques: subcuticular polyglycolic acid and interrupted monofilament nylon mattress sutures.

A prospective, randomized trial was performed to compare the incidence of wound infection following skin closure with subcuticular polyglycolic acid and interrupted monofilament nylon mattress sutures in patients undergoing high saphenous ligation (126 patients; 75 polyglycolic acid wounds, 86 interrupted monofilament nylon mattress wounds). By 6 weeks after operation, pus had discharged from 15 (20%) polyglycolic acid wounds compared with seven (8%) interrupted monofilament nylon mattress wounds (P = 0.05), giving an overall infection rate of 13.7%. Infection occurred in 23% of the 56 procedures performed by the two surgeons with the highest infection rates compared with 8% of the 105 procedures performed by the remaining nine surgeons (P = 0.02). The excess of infections in wounds closed with subcuticular polyglycolic acid was caused by an excess of infections in operations performed by the two surgeons with the highest infection rates. The higher infection rate found with subcuticular polyglycolic acid appeared to be operator dependent.     

Abdominal wound closure comparing the proximate stapler with sutures

Proximate staple closure of transverse and vertical abdominal wounds is compared with suture closure in a prospective, blind, randomized trial. Fifty-seven wounds were randomly allocated to 3/0 Prolene or Proximate staple closure. Each wound was photographed after removal of staples or sutures and again in the sixth postoperative week. The photographic slides were independently assessed by eight observers, who graded the cosmetic result of each wound on a scale from 1 to 10. The cosmetic score in transverse wounds closed with sub-cuticular sutures was better than with staples. Cosmetic scores in vertical wounds were almost equal for staples and sutures. Staple closure was faster than suture closure. Proximate staple closure is considered a suitable and faster method for vertical abdominal wounds.     

The Donati stitch revisited: favorable cosmetic results in a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Literature on the cosmetic results of various surgical methods to close the skin is scarce. We sought to compare the cosmetic results of two different surgical techniques of skin closure after lower midline laparotomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized clinical trial compared a running nylon skin suture to interrupted Donati stitches in 58 patients undergoing gynecological surgery. Scar hypertrophy, scar width, scar color, the presence of cross-hatching marks, and a total scar score were assessed in all patients at 2 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: On average closing the wounds with Donati stitches took 5 min longer than using a running suture (P > 0.001). The Donati sutures caused significantly less cross-hatching at 2 weeks and 6 months postoperatively. At 1 year, the scar color following Donati closure was also significantly less pronounced than in the running suture arm. The total scar score was significantly better in the Donati arm at each of the three time periods of assessment. The difference at 6 months was equal to the difference at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Closing the skin of lower midline laparotomy wounds with Donati stitches resulted in a cosmetically better scar. Scar cosmetics of lower midline laparotomies could be improved by using interrupted Donati stitches instead of a running suture. The difference was significant at 2 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively, but the magnitude of the difference was the same at 6 and at 12 months.     

Prospective study comparing wounds closed with tape with sutured wounds in colorectal surgery.

HYPOTHESIS: To test the efficacy of adhesive paper tape in the closure of clean-contaminated wounds following elective colorectal resection. DESIGN: A prospective, nonrandomized controlled study. SETTING: A medical center that offers a mixture of primary, secondary, and tertiary care services. PATIENTS: The group undergoing skin closure with paper tape (PT group) consisted of 150 patients. The group undergoing skin closure with interrupted suture (IS group) also comprised 150 patients. All 300 patients underwent elective colorectal resection in 1997. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The duration of skin closure, wound complication rate, and cosmetic appearance of the scar at 6 months after operation were compared using the chi(2)test or t test. RESULTS: The mean +/- SD average duration of skin closure was 116 +/- 23 seconds for the PT group and 457 +/- 64 seconds for the IS group (P<.01). The wound complication rate was 3.3% (3 cases with wound infection; 2 with wound separation) for the PT group and 3.3% (5 cases with wound infection) for the IS group (P = 1.0). No significant differences were found between the narrowest width (mean +/- SD, 2.2 +/- 0.9 mm vs 2.3 +/- 1.0 mm) and widest width (mean +/- SD, 4.7 +/- 2.0 mm vs 4.3 +/- 1.8 mm) of scar formation between the 2 groups at 6 months after the operation. Ninety-eight percent of patients in the PT group reported satisfaction with their scar, compared with 92% in the IS group (P =.03). CONCLUSION: Compared with the traditional suture method, paper tape closure in the treatment of clean-contaminated wounds was less time consuming and produced greater patient satisfaction with no increased rate of wound complications.     

Surgical site infection in spinal surgery: a comparative study between 2-octyl-cyanoacrylate and staples for wound closure

Background

Surgical site infection (SSI) after spinal surgery is a devastating complication. Various methods of skin closure are used in spinal surgery, but the optimal skin-closure method remains unclear. A recent report recommended against the use of metal staples for skin closure in orthopedic surgery. 2-Octyl-cyanoacrylate (Dermabond; Ethicon, NJ, USA) has been widely applied for wound closure in various surgeries. In this cohort study, we assessed the rate of SSI in spinal surgery using metal staples and 2-octyl-cyanoacrylate for wound closure.

Methods

This study enrolled 609 consecutive patients undergoing spinal surgery in our hospital. From April 2007 to March 2010 surgical wounds were closed with metal staples (group 1, n = 294). From April 2010 to February 2012 skin closure was performed using 2-octyl-cyanoacrylate (group 2, n = 315). We assessed the rate of SSI using these two different methods of wound closure. Prospective study of the time and cost evaluation of wound closure was performed between two groups.

Results

Patients in the 2-octyl-cyanoacrylate group had more risk factors for SSI than those in the metal-staple group. Nonetheless, eight patients in the metal-staple group compared with none in the 2-octyl-cyanoacrylate group acquired SSIs (p < 0.01). The closure of the wound in length of 10 cm with 2-octyl-cyanoacrylate could save 28 s and $13.5.

Conclusions

This study reveals that in spinal surgery, wound closure using 2-octyl-cyanoacrylate was associated with a lower rate of SSI than wound closure with staples. Moreover, the use of 2-octyl-cyanoacrylate has a more time saving effect and cost-effectiveness than the use of staples in wound closure of 10 cm in length.     

Closure of laparotomy wounds: skin staples versus sutures.

To investigate the routine use of a skin stapling device for the closure of midline abdominal wounds, 48 patients were randomized to receive skin staples or subcuticular polydioxanone sutures. The mean (range) time for closure with staples was 8.0 (3.4-14.8) s cm-1 while subcuticular closure took 12.7 (9.6-28.0) s cm-1. The mean time saved per patient with skin staples was 77 s. Wound pain and requirements for analgesia were significantly lower in the sutured group. The mean cost per patient was 1.41 pounds for subcuticular closure and 7.72 pounds for stapling; the latter also incurred an additional cost of 6.27 pounds for staple removal. No clear benefit derives from the use of staples in the closure of abdominal wounds.     

Abdominal wound closure--a comparison of monofilament nylon and polyglycolic acid

The incidence of burst abdomen, incisional herniation, and sinus formation after a vertical abdominal incision was studied in a prospective randomized trial that compared two suture materials--monofilament nylon and polyglycolic acid. Laparotomy wounds were closed with a continuous mass suture technique. Of the 210 patients studied, 15 died between 10 days and 6 months postoperatively with their wounds intact. The remaining patients were followed up for 6 months or longer. The two groups were well matched for known risk factors. The 104 patients in the polyglycolic acid group had a 12.5% wound failure rate (1 burst abdomen and 12 hernias), but the 106 patients in the nylon group had only a 4.7% wound failure rate (1 burst abdomen and 4 hernias) (P = 0.04). There was a significant association between the rate of infection and sinus formation, but there was no difference between the incidence of these complications between the two groups. Closure of abdominal wounds with absorbable sutures does not appear to be justified, and we suggest that nylon and the mass closure technique be used for all abdominal wound closures. Other etiologic factors significantly associated with wound failure include male sex and postoperative chest complications. However, infection remains the most significant postoperative complication because the incidence of incisional hernias and sinus formation would be reduced by the elimination of wound sepsis.     

Randomized trial of skin closure after laparotomy for gynaecological surgery

BACKGROUND: New suture materials may provide patients with a better cosmetic outcome at similar pain and wound complication rate. METHODS: To assess pain and cosmetic outcome among patients randomized to receive wound closure after laparotomy for gynaecological surgery using staples, polyglecaprone 25 or polyglecaprone 6211 subcuticular sutures. RESULTS: Overall, 90 patients (87.4% consent rate) were randomized. There was no difference in wound complications and pain between the three groups. Patients randomized to polyglecaprone 6211 subcuticular sutures rated the cosmetic result at 1 and 6 weeks after surgery somewhat lower than patients randomized to the two alternative groups; however, at 3 months after surgery, all three groups rated the cosmetic result as similar. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the three wound closure methods have similar short-term pain and cosmetic outcomes, as well as a similar rate of wound complications, leaving the decision of the most appropriate closure method to individual surgeons.     

Tensile strength of wound closure with cyanoacrylate glue.

2-Octyl cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive is increasingly being used for closure of traumatic lacerations. Data regarding the strength of incisions closed with 2-octyl cyanoacrylate are limited. We compared the strength of disruption of closure with glue with that of more conventional methods of wound closure. Segments of fresh porcine skin measuring 3.5 x 10 cm were approximated by one of four methods: 1) 2-octyl cyanoacrylate glue, 2) surgical staples, 3) 0.5 inch Steri-Strips, and 4) interrupted 4-0 poliglecaprone 25 sutures in a subcuticular fashion. Fifteen specimens were used to test each type of closure. The strength of closure was tested on an Instron 4502 tensionometer. The peak force required for disruption of the closure was recorded and the strength of the closure was compared. Staples provided the strongest closure. Skin glue proved superior to Steri-Strips but inferior to stapled closure. The difference between skin glue and suture closure was not statistically significant (P = 0.12). Patterns of failure differed between the groups. Skin glue failed because of disruption of the skin-glue interface. 2-Octyl cyanoacrylate glue provides a wound closure that is similar to closure with an interrupted subcuticular absorbable suture. This study validates the clinical use of skin glue for closure of surgical incisions. The technique should be used with caution in areas of the body that are subject to tension.     

Skin closure using staples and nylon sutures: a comparison of results.

A disposable skin stapler (Elite: Auto Suture UK Ltd) and Nylon vertical mattress sutures have been used for skin closure. The complications related to each method were evaluated in 129 wounds. There was a higher incidence of inflammation, discomfort on removal and spreading of the healing scar associated with staples. The only advantage of staples was speed of wound closure.