The Significance of Mixed States in Depression and Mania

Antipsychotic-induced weight gain (AIWG) is a prevalent side effect of antipsychotic treatment, particularly with second generation antipsychotics, such as clozapine and olanzapine. At this point, there is virtually nothing that can be done to predict who will be affected by AIWG. However, hope for the future of prediction lies with genetic risk factors. Many genes have been studied for their association with AIWG with a variety of promising findings. This review will focus on genetic findings in the last year and will discuss the first epigenetic and biomarker findings as well. Although there are significant findings in many other genes, the most consistently replicated findings are in the melanocortin 4 receptor (MC4R), the serotonin 2C receptor (HTR2C), the leptin, the neuropeptide Y (NPY) and the cannabinoid receptor 1 (CNR1) genes. The study of genetic risk variants poses great promise in creating predictive tools for side effects such as AIWG.     

The Mount Sinai conference on the pharmacotherapy of schizophrenia

This report summarizes the recommendations from a consensus meeting that focused on specific questions regarding the pharmacotherapy of schizophrenia. The issues were selected because there was evidence that experts had recently disagreed about the evidence supporting a particular practice or when there were substantial variations in a clinical practice indicating that there was disagreement among clinicians. The group of experts was able to reach a consensus regarding the evidence base pertaining to the following issues: First generation (FGAs) and second generation (SGAs) antipsychotics as first line agents; the duration of antipsychotic trials; the effectiveness of clozapine and other agents for treatment refractory schizophrenia; risk of tardive dyskinesia on FGAs and SGAs; differences among antipsychotics for different dimensions of psychopathology; and side effect monitoring for various antipsychotics.     

Antipsychotic therapy during early and late pregnancy. A systematic review

Objective: Both first- (FGAs) and second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) are routinely used in treating severe and persistent psychiatric disorders. However, until now no articles have analyzed systematically the safety of both classes of psychotropics during pregnancy. Data sources and search strategy: Medical literature information published in any language since 1950 was identified using MEDLINE/PubMed, TOXNET, EMBASE, and The Cochrane Library. Additional references were identified from the reference lists of published articles. Bibliographical information, including contributory unpublished data, was also requested from companies developing drugs. Search terms were pregnancy, psychotropic drugs, (a)typical-first-second-generation antipsychotics, and neuroleptics. A separate search was also conducted to complete the safety profile of each reviewed medication. Searches were last updated on July 2008. Data selection: All articles reporting primary data on the outcome of pregnancies exposed to antipsychotics were acquired, without methodological limitations. Conclusions: Reviewed information was too limited to draw definite conclusions on structural teratogenicity of FGAs and SGAs. Both classes of drugs seem to be associated with an increased risk of neonatal complications. However, most SGAs appear to increase risk of gestational metabolic complications and babies large for gestational age and with mean birth weight significantly heavier as compared with those exposed to FGAs. These risks have been reported rarely with FGAs. Hence, the choice of the less harmful option in pregnancy should be limited to FGAs in drug-naive patients. When pregnancy occurs during antipsychotic treatment, the choice to continue the previous therapy should be preferred.     

A meta-analysis of the efficacy of second-generation antipsychotics

BACKGROUND: Consensus panel recommendations regarding choice of an antipsychotic agent for schizophrenia differ markedly, but most consider second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) as a homogeneous group. It has been suggested that SGAs seem falsely more efficacious than first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs) as a result of reduced efficacy due to use of a high-dose comparator, haloperidol. We performed (1) a meta-analysis of randomized efficacy trials comparing SGAs and FGAs, (2) comparisons between SGAs, (3) a dose-response analysis of FGAs and SGAs, and (4) an analysis of the effect on efficacy of an overly high dose of an FGA comparator. METHODS: Literature search of clinical trials between January 1953 and May 2002 of patients with schizophrenia from electronic databases, reference lists, posters, the Food and Drug Administration, and other unpublished data. We included 124 randomized controlled trials with efficacy data on 10 SGAs vs FGAs and 18 studies of comparisons between SGAs. Two of us independently extracted the sample sizes, means, and standard deviation of the efficacy data. RESULTS: Using the Hedges-Olkin algorithm, the effect sizes of clozapine, amisulpride, risperidone, and olanzapine were 0.49, 0.29, 0.25, and 0.21 greater than those of FGAs, with P values of 2 x 10-8, 3 x 10-7, 2 x 10-12, and 3 x 10-9, respectively. The remaining 6 SGAs were not significantly different from FGAs, although zotepine was marginally different. No efficacy difference was detected among amisulpride, risperidone, and olanzapine. We found no evidence that the haloperidol dose (or all FGA comparators converted to haloperidol-equivalent doses) affected these results when we examined its effect by drug or in a 2-way analysis of variance model in which SGA effectiveness is entered as a second factor. CONCLUSION: Some SGAs are more efficacious than FGAs, and, therefore, SGAs are not a homogeneous group.     

Drug treatments for schizophrenia: pragmatism in trial design shows lack of progress in drug design

Aims.The introduction of second generation antipsychotic (SGA) medication over a decade ago led to changes in prescribing practices; these drugs have eclipsed their predecessors as treatments for schizophrenia. However, the metabolic side effects of these newer antipsychotics have been marked and there are increasing concerns as to whether these novel drugs really are superior to their predecessors in terms of the balance between risks and benefits. In this article, we review the literature regarding comparisons between first generation antipsychotic (FGA) and SGA in terms of clinical effectiveness.Methods.Large (n > 150) randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effectiveness (efficacy and side effects) of FGA and SGA medications other than clozapine were reviewed, as were meta-analyses that included smaller studies.Results.The superiority in efficacy and reduced extrapyramidal side effects (EPSE) of SGAs is modest, especially when compared with low-dose FGAs. However, the high risk of weight gain and other metabolic disturbances associated with certain SGAs such as olanzapine is markedly higher than the risk with FGAs at the doses used in the trials.Conclusions.The efficacy profiles of various FGAs and SGAs are relatively similar, but their side effects vary between and within classes. Overall, large pragmatic trials of clinical effectiveness indicate that the care used in prescribing and managing drug treatments to ensure tolerability may be more important than the class of drug used.Key words: antipsychotic drugs, clinical effectiveness, schizophrenia, randomized controlled trials     

Antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia: an overview

Schizophrenia is characterized by positive, negative, cognitive, disorganization, and mood symptoms. Antipsychotics are the mainstay in the pharmacologic treatment of schizophrenia. Findings concerning efficacy for positive symptoms and disorganization suggest no consistent differences among available antipsychotics, with the exception of clozapine's superior efficacy for treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Efficacy for negative, depressive, and cognitive symptoms appears to be determined by (1) the extent to which reduction in positive symptoms brings about improvement in these other domains and (2) the extent to which extrapyramidal side effects (EPS) and anticholinergic effects (of the antipsychotic and of agents used to treat EPS) exacerbate them. Thus, the ability of antipsychotics to produce a potent antipsychotic effect without EPS and need for concomitant anticholinergic therapy yields multiple therapeutic benefits. In contrast to their broadly similar efficacy, antipsychotics differ markedly in their propensity to cause various adverse effects. Although second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) have generally been believed to be associated with a lower risk of EPS but a higher risk of metabolic adverse effects than first-generation agents (FGAs), the substantial variation in these and other side effects among agents within both classes indicates that it is not clinically useful to make a categorical distinction between FGAs and SGAs. Choice of antipsychotic medication should be based on individual preference, prior treatment response and side effect experience, medical history and risk factors, and adherence history, with side effect profile a major determinant of antipsychotic choice.     

Pharmacogenetic Correlates of Antipsychotic-Induced Weight Gain in the Chinese Population

Antipsychotic-induced weight gain(AIWG) is a common adverse effect of this treatment, particularly with second-generation antipsychotics, and it is a major health problem around the world. We aimed to review the progress of pharmacogenetic studies on AIWG in the Chinese population to compare the results for Chinese with other ethnic populations, identify the limitations and problems of current studies, and provide future research directions in China. Both English and Chinese electronic databases were searched to identify eligible studies. We determined that [ 25 single-nucleotide polymorphisms in19 genes have been investigated in association with AIWG in Chinese patients over the past few decades. HTR2 C rs3813929 is the most frequently studied single-nucleotide polymorphism, and it seems to be the most strongly associated with AIWG in the Chinese population. However, many genes that have been reported to be associated with AIWG in other ethnic populations have not beenincluded in Chinese studies. To explain the pharmacogenetic reasons for AIWG in the Chinese population,genome-wide association studies and multiple-center, standard, unified, and large samples are needed.     

Association study of polymorphisms in leptin and leptin receptor genes with antipsychotic-induced body weight gain

Background

Antipsychotic-induced weight gain (AIWG) is a serious side-effect of antipsychotic medication leading to metabolic syndrome and increased cardiovascular morbidity. Unfortunately, there are still no valid predictors to assess an individual's risk to gain weight. Previous studies have indicated an impact of genetic variation in the genes encoding leptin, LEP, and leptin receptor, LEPR, on AIWG, but results have not been conclusive. Thus, we investigated polymorphisms in both genes for an association with AIWG.

Methods

A total of 181 schizophrenic and schizoaffective patients treated with various antipsychotics were included. In a small subset of patients, leptin plasma levels were additionally obtained. Five polymorphisms in LEP and LEPR (LEP: rs7799039 (-2548G/A polymorphism), rs10954173, rs3828942; LEPR: rs1327120, rs1137101 (Q223R polymorphism) were genotyped using TaqMan assays. Statistical association with % weight change from baseline weight was performed using ANCOVA with baseline weight as covariate.

Results

ANCOVA showed a non-significant trend for genotype association of the rs7799039 marker (p = .068). No significant association of the other LEP and LEPR SNPs with AIWG was detected. However, we found a significant association between a haplotype of LEP rs7799039G–rs10954173G–rs3828942G (p = .035) and AIWG. The rs7799039 G-allele (p = .042) and G-allele of rs3828942 (p = .032) were associated with higher weight gain.

Conclusion

Our study supports the hypothesis of an impact of LEP gene variation on AIWG. Limitations of our study include heterogeneous samples, short treatment duration and multiple comparisons. Our findings were compared to previous studies in detail in order to provide the readers with a more conclusive picture. However, further studies are warranted including more gene variants and interaction analyses with other genes of the leptin–melanocortin pathway.     

Depot antipsychotic medications in bipolar disorder: a review of the literature

OBJECTIVE: To review the literature on the efficacy and safety of depot formulations of first- and second-generation antipsychotic medications (FGAs and SGAs) in patients with bipolar disorder. METHOD: We conducted a computer-aided MEDLINE search using the search terms 'depot antipsychotic', 'bipolar disorder' and 'compliance.' RESULTS: We identified eight published reports in bipolar patients regarding the use of depot FGAs, and six preliminary reports on the use of depot SGAs. These studies suggest that depots FGAs are efficacious in preventing manic episodes during the maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder. Several studies, however, indicate that depot FGAs may be associated with increased time with depressive symptoms, particularly in patients with a predominantly depressive course of illness. Preliminary data on the role of depot formulations of SGAs suggest that they reduce the frequency of both manic and depressive episodes during maintenance treatment, and are well tolerated by patients. CONCLUSION: After a careful risk-benefit analysis, depot antipsychotics may be considered for the long-term control of mood episodes in bipolar patients who have relapsed due to medication non-adherence or who have failed to respond to standard therapies. Depot FGAs should be avoided in patients with a high burden of illness from depressive symptoms and particularly in those judged to be at high risk of suicide. The available data on depot formulations of SGAs indicate that they are efficacious in the maintenance treatment of bipolar illness without increasing the burden of the depressive pole of the illness, but further systematic studies are required to definitively assess this.     

Rethinking antipsychotic formulary policy

In this commentary, we review recent research suggesting that (a) second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) may be no more effective than first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs), (b) the reduced risk of EPS and tardive dyskinesia with SGAs is more weakly supported by the research literature than has been appreciated, and (c) benefits may be offset by greater metabolic risks of some SGAs and their substantially greater cost. Bearing in mind, as well, that risperidone, currently the least expensive SGA, will soon be available as an even less expensive generic drug, we propose a new algorithm for maintenance antipsychotic therapy. We further outline a cautious implementation procedure that relies on standardized documentation and feedback, without a restrictive formulary that would limit physician choice. The algorithm outlined here and the process for its implementation are intended as a stimulus for discussion of potential policy responses, not as a finalized proposition.     

Pharmacogenetics of antipsychotic therapy: pivotal research issues and the prospects for clinical implementation

The core hypothesis underlying pharmacogenetics is that genetic factors play a significant role in the well-recognized differences between individuals in response to medication and susceptibility to adverse effects. If these genetic factors can be identified and understood, they may serve as predictors to guide clinicians in tailoring medication to the individual patient. Recent developments in the field of antipsychotic drug treatment suggest that pharmacogenetics could play an important role, permitting the use of first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs) for patients in whom the use of second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) is limited by efficacy considerations or adverse effects. In this paper, key issues that need to be taken into consideration in designing and interpreting pharmacogenetic studies of antipsychotic drugs are discussed against the background of data emanating from studies on the genetics of tardive dyskinesia (TD), an important adverse effect of FGAs. The issues considered include the advantages and potential pitfalls of case-control association studies of pharmacogenetic traits, the role of demographic factors such as age and gender, additive effects of genes, and gene-gene and gene-environment interaction. The prospects for implementation of pharmacogenetic testing in the clinic are considered in the context of a preliminary model that has been tested for prediction of susceptibility to TD.     

Comparative efficacy of antipsychotics in the treatment of schizophrenia: a critical assessment

Because of their broader spectrum of efficacy and lower risk of short- and long-term motor side-effects in comparison to first generation 'typical' antipsychotics (FGAs), second generation 'atypical' antipsychotics (SGAs) are rapidly becoming the standard of antipsychotic pharmacotherapy. It is unclear, however, as to how different SGAs compare in efficacy since the multitude of studies and integrative reviews seemingly provide discrepant information in this regard. To address this issue, we critically review three distinct approaches to analysis of data from randomized controlled clinical trials of the efficacy of SGAs in the treatment of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder: (i) comparing average improvement in symptomatology with different SGAs; (ii) comparing average improvement observed with different SGAs relative to haloperidol; and (iii) head-head trials comparing one SGA to another. We discuss the strengths and limitations of each approach with reference to the reports in which it was applied to assess comparative antipsychotic efficacy. We conclude that the most informative picture is obtained by using each of these strategies, looking at all available data, and then putting all the results together. Data thus far do not support claims of differential efficacy among SGAs with the singular exception of clozapine possibly still being the gold standard of antipsychotic efficacy in otherwise treatment-refractory schizophrenia. Dosing appears to be a critical variable in optimizing efficacy.     

Typical and atypical antipsychotics differentially affect long-term incidence rates of the metabolic syndrome in first-episode patients with schizophrenia: a retrospective chart review

The presence of the metabolic syndrome (MetS) is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease and diabetes. There are limited data on the prevalence of MetS in patients with schizophrenia at the onset of the disorder and specifically no data on patients treated in the era when only first-generation antipsychotics were available.

Methods

Data from a historic cohort of consecutively admitted first-episode patients with schizophrenia treated with first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs) were compared with an age and sex matched series of consecutive first-episode patients treated only with second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs). Rates of MetS were compared at baseline and after on average 3 years of treatment exposure.

Results

At first episode there was no difference in the prevalence of MetS between the historic and the current cohort. Rates of MetS increased over time in both groups, but patients started on SGAs had a three times higher incidence rate of MetS (Odds Ratio 3.6, CI 1.7–7.5). The average increase in weight and body mass index was twice as high in patients started on SGA. The difference between the FGA and SGA group was no longer significant when patients started on clozapine and olanzapine were excluded.

Conclusion

Rates of MetS at the first episode of schizophrenia today are not different from those of patients 15 to 20 years ago. This finding counters the notion that the high rates of metabolic abnormalities in patients with schizophrenia currently reported are mainly due to lifestyle changes over time in the general population. Some SGAs have a significantly more negative impact on the incidence of MetS compared to FGAs in first-episode patients.     

Behavioral therapy for weight loss in patients with schizophrenia

Compared with the general population, individuals with schizophrenia demonstrate an increased prevalence of obesity. While most antipsychotics are associated with weight gain, certain second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) appear to be especially problematic. Weight gain and obesity are highly distressing to these patients, can reduce treatment adherence, and may increase the relative risk of serious medical conditions and all-cause premature mortality. The selection of an antipsychotic on the basis of its effectiveness and relative side effect profile is recognized as an important initial consideration in the treatment of schizophrenia. However, less is known regarding the efficacy of dietary, pharmacologic, and behavioral therapy in reducing antipsychotic-related weight gain and obesity. Behavioral therapy, in particular, is understudied, and there are relatively few controlled trials of its effectiveness in reducing SGA-induced weight gain. Although weight loss resulting from behavioral therapy has been observed mostly as a result of effective short-term interventions, controlled behavioral studies do exist to suggest that weight can be controlled long term. In addition, a small pilot study in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder recently demonstrated that behavioral therapy that utilizes stepped interventions, involving body weight self-monitoring, diet, and exercise, can prevent weight gain in patients initiating treatment with SGAs. Additional studies of behavioral therapy for long-term weight control in patients with schizophrenia and other forms of severe mental illness are warranted.     

Weight gain and increase of body mass index among children and adolescents treated with antipsychotics: a critical review

We performed an updated review of the available literature on weight gain and increase of body mass index (BMI) among children and adolescents treated with antipsychotic medications. A PubMed search was conducted specifying the following MeSH terms: (antipsychotic agents) hedged with (weight gain) or (body mass index). We selected 127 reports, including 71 intervention trials, 42 observational studies and 14 literature reviews. Second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs), in comparison with first-generation antipsychotics, are associated with a greater risk for antipsychotic-induced weight gain although this oversimplification should be clarified by distinguishing across different antipsychotic drugs. Among SGAs, olanzapine appears to cause the most significant weight gain, while ziprasidone seems to cause the least. Antipsychotic-induced BMI increase appears to remain regardless of the specific psychotropic co-treatment. Children and adolescents seem to be at a greater risk than adults for antipsychotic-induced weight gain; and the younger the child, the higher the risk. Genetic or environmental factors related to antipsychotic-induced weight gain among children and adolescents are mostly unknown, although certain genetic factors related to serotonin receptors or hormones such as leptin, adiponectin or melanocortin may be involved. Strategies to reduce this antipsychotic side effect include switching to another antipsychotic drug, lowering the dosage or initiating treatment with metformin or topiramate, as well as non-pharmacological interventions. Future research should avoid some methodological limitations such as not accounting for age- and sex-adjusted BMI (zBMI), small sample size, short period of treatment, great heterogeneity of diagnoses and confounding by indication.     

首发精神分裂症血清脂联素及代谢指标与第二代抗精神病药引发肥胖相关性研究

目的通过检测首发精神分裂症患者(first-episode schizophrenic patients,FEP)服用第二代抗精神病药物(second generation antipsychotics,SGAs)8周前后的血清脂联素(adiponectin,APN)及代谢相关指标水平,探讨SGAs对首发精神分裂症患者APN的影响以及APN在SGAs引发肥胖中的作用。方法选取86例首发未服药的精神分裂症患者,及88名性别年龄相匹配的正常对照,患者组使用单一SGAs治疗8周,测定患者组治疗前、治疗8周末及对照组的体重、体质指数(body mass index,BMI)、腰臀比(waist-to-hip ratio,WHR)及空腹血糖(fasting plasma glucose,FPG)、甘油三酯(triglyceride,TG)、APN、空腹胰岛素(fasting insulin,FINS)等指标。结果患者组在治疗前APN水平低于对照组[(9.32±0.76)μg/m L vs.(10.9±0.66)μg/m L],FINS水平高于对照组[(12.68±11.70)μIU/m L vs.(6.47±2.87)μIU/m L],差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。与治疗前相比,患者组SGAs治疗8周后体重[(59.01±10.56)kg vs.(63.80±9.78)kg]、BMI[(21.74±3.57)kg/m2vs.(23.49±3.44)kg/m2]、WHR[(0.88±0.07)vs.(0.92±0.05)]、TG[(0.94±0.92)mmol/L vs.(1.63±1.08)mmol/L]和FINS水平[(12.68±11.70)μIU/m L vs.(20.27±15.02)μIU/m L]增加,差异均有统计学意义(P0.01),而患者组治疗后APN[(9.32±0.76)μg/m L vs.(8.03±0.68)μg/m L]及FPG[(5.04±1.01)mmol/L vs.(4.46±0.57)mmol/L]水平降低,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。在男性患者组中,基线APN水平与治疗后体重增加值呈正相关(r=0.548,P=0.005),女性患者组中该相关无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论首发精神分裂症患者在治疗前APN水平降低,SGAs可进一步降低患者APN水平;在男性患者中,基线APN水平对服药后的体重增加有预测作用。     

Cerebral cortical gray expansion associated with two second-generation antipsychotics.

BACKGROUND: Second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) differ from first-generation antipsychotics (FGAs) with respect to induction of less extrapyramidal morbidity, partially reducing negative symptoms, and causing modest improvement in neurocognitive functioning in patients with schizophrenia. SGAs demonstrate 5-HT2a antagonism. Differential effects of SGAs and FGAs on cortical gray volumes are explored herein. METHODS: Cerebral cortical gray was examined volumetrically in 19 patients with schizophrenia before and following 28 days of treatment with two SGAs (risperidone and ziprasidone; n = 13) or a FGA (haloperidol; n = 6). Seven (untreated) control subjects were also assessed at a similar interval. RESULTS: During treatment with the SGAs risperidone and ziprasidone, cerebral cortical gray of 13 patients with schizophrenia expanded 20.6 +/- 11.4 cc (p < .0005). Six patients receiving the FGA haloperidol, as well as 7 control subjects, showed no change in cortical gray volumes (p = .983 and p = .932, respectively) at the time of reassessment. CONCLUSIONS: Volumetric increase of cerebral cortical gray occurred early in the course of treatment with the SGAs ziprasidone and risperidone, but not with the FGA haloperidol. Such cortical gray expansion may be relevant to the reported enhanced neurocognition and quality of life associated with SGA treatment.