腹腔镜腹膜前疝修补和全腹膜外疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的优劣比较

腹股沟疝是外科常见疾病。随着医学的发展,疝修补术从传统张力疝修补,转变到无张力修补,再到腹腔镜修补。腹腔镜疝修补术治疗优势明显,经腹腔腹膜前疝修补术(transabdominal preperitoneal,TAPP)和全腹膜外疝修补术(totally extra-peritoneal,TEP)是目前国内常用的两种修补术式。长期以来,两种术式各有优缺点,本文从TAPP和TEP在治疗原发单侧疝的手术时间、术中及术后并发症、术后疼痛、总住院时长、治疗复发疝及双侧疝的疗效等多方面进行对比,得出成人原发单侧腹股沟疝最好选用TEP。在治疗复发疝时,优先考虑TAPP。在治疗双侧疝时,TAPP和TEP暂时未见明显差异。临床医师在使用腹腔镜治疗腹股沟疝时应选用更熟悉更合理的手术方式。     

完全腹膜外腔镜疝修补技术和疝环充填式疝修补术的随机对照研究

目的 探讨腹股沟疝完全腹膜外腔镜术(total extraperitoneal hernia repair,TEP)和疝环充填式无张力疝修补手术(mesh-Plug)方法的优缺点.方法 2007年12月至2009年12月间,89例腹股沟疝患者行腹腔镜疝修补术(TEP组),80例行疝环充填式修补术(Plug组),就其手术时间、住院时间和恢复工作时间以及各种并发症进行比较.随访时间6～24个月.结果 TEP组住院时间短,恢复工作时间较Plug组快,术后疼痛较轻(P＜0.05),慢性疼痛出现较少.单侧手术时,TEP组比Plug组手术时间长(P＜0.001),但在双侧手术时两组差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05).Plug组住院费用较TEP组低(P＜0.001).复发TEP组1例(1.1%),Plug组1例(1.3%),两者复发率差异无统计学意义.结论 腹腔镜疝修补术是一种安全而有效的微创疝修补手术,较疝环充填式无张力疝修补术后疼痛更轻,恢复时间短,术后并发症和复发率两者并无差别,且对双侧疝修补更具有优势.     

TEP与TAPP术治疗腹股沟疝临床疗效比较

目的分析比较腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术(TEP)与经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术(TAPP)治疗腹股沟疝的疗效。方法回顾性分析2015年8月～2016年8月我院收治的112例腹股沟疝患者的临床资料,其中57例行TEP术(TEP组),55例行TAPP术组(TAPP)。比较两组临床疗效、并发症及复发情况。结果 TEP组手术时间、住院费用少于TAPP组,差异有统计学意义(P 0. 05);两组术中出血量、住院时间、术后疼痛持续时间、术后1 d疼痛VAS评分、并发症发生率及疾病复发率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P 0. 05)。结论 TEP与TAPP术治疗腹股沟疝均有显著疗效,且并发症较少,安全可靠,临床可根据患者具体病情及术者经验选择合适的术式治疗。     

腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术和腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝的疗效

目的探讨腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术（TAPP）和腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术（TEP）治疗成人腹股沟疝的临床疗效及安全性对比研究。 方法选取2016年3月至2019年3月入住南京市栖霞区医院的成人腹股沟疝患者320例，按治疗方式分为TAPP及TEP组，各160例。比较2组手术时长及临床效果、出现并发症和复发的概率、心理状态。 结果TAPP组与TEP组双侧疝手术时长、单侧疝手术时长、疼痛持续时长、肛门排气时间无差异，但TAPP组住院时长短于TEP组（P<0.05）；TAPP组和TEP组并发症及复发率比较，差异均无统计学意义（P>0.05）；治疗后TEP组心理状态明显优于TAPP组（P<0.05）。 结论在治疗成人腹股沟疝患者的过程中，腹腔镜TAPP及TEP术式疗效显著且具有较高安全性，值得在临床推广应用。     

腹腔镜经腹膜前、完全腹膜外和无张力疝修补术的前瞻性对照研究

目的通过对比研究腹腔镜经腹腹膜前补片植入术（TAPP）、完全腹膜外腹腔镜疝修补术（TEP）和开放无张力疝修补术,总结3种手术方法的优缺点。方法将124例腹股沟疝患者随机分为TAPP组44例、TEP组R40例及开放无张力修补组40例。分别行TAPP、TEP和无张力疝修补术（Lichtenstein修补）,术后对患者进行随访,比较3组患者的手术相关参数。结果TAPP组与TEP组在手术时间、住院天数、住院费用、恢复工作时间、术后疼痛程度方面比较差异无统计学意义。两组与开放无张力修补组比较差异有高度统计学意义（P〈0．01）。3组在并发症方面的差异无统计学意义。TAPP组与TEP组术后各有1例因补片曲卷移位而复发。结论与开放无张力疝修补手术相比,TAPP及TEP较安全可行,且患者疼痛轻、恢复快。TAPP对于复发性疝、双侧疝及隐形疝的优势更加明显,随着修补材料的不断改进及手术熟练程度的提高,TAPP会有更广阔的前景。     

腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术与腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术手术疗效的对比

目的总结腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术(LIHR)治疗腹股沟疝的手术经验,比较腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)与腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术(TEP)治疗腹股沟疝的临床效果。方法回顾性分析2011年7月至2014年9月湖北省宜昌市三峡大学第三临床医学院葛洲坝中心医院普外科收治的230例LIHR手术病例,按照手术方式分为A组和B组,以应用腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)治疗的127例腹股沟疝患者为A组,应用腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术(TEP)治疗的103例患者为B组,对比2组患者手术时间、术后住院天数、探查对侧及隐匿疝、术后疼痛、术后血清肿及术后复发率情况。结果 230例手术均顺利完成,手术时间A组(45±10)min,B组(35±8)min,2组患者手术时间差异有统计学意义(P0.05),在探查对侧隐匿疝上差异有统计学意义(P0.01),术后住院天数及并发症差异无统计学意义(P0.05);随访1~38个月,无1例复发。结论腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)与腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术(TEP)治疗腹股沟疝均是安全、有效的,两者手术疗效相当。     

腹腔镜下腹股沟疝修补术的术式选择与效果

目的:探讨腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的手术方法选择.方法:回顾分析广西医科大学第一附属医院2004年1月—2008年1月经腹腔腹膜前腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术( TAPP)和完全腹膜外腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术(TEP) 162例(178侧)患者的临床资料,比较两组的术中出血量、手术时间、术后肛门排气时间、术后住院天数、术后并发症、术后复发率及远期慢性疼痛等临床效果.结果:两组患者术前的一般临床资料具有可比性(均P＞0.05),两组均无手术死亡和术后严重并发症病例.下床活动时间、近期并发症、住院天数两组间差异无统计学意义(均P＞0.05),但TAPP组的手术时间,复发疝的手术成功率明显高于TEP组(均P＜0.05),TEP组肛门排气时间短于TAPP( P＜0.05).结论:腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术安全性好,两种术式各有优缺点,具体的要根据患者情况及手术者本人的手术技能而定,不能盲目采取统一手术方式.     

开放与腹腔镜无张力疝修补术治疗老年腹股沟疝的对比研究

目的比较开放和腹腔镜完全腹膜外无张力疝修补治疗老年腹股沟疝的疗效。方法 2006年1月～2010年1月136例老年腹股沟疝行开腹无张力填充式腹股沟疝修补术（开放组,n=72）或腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术（totally extraperitoneal hernioplasty,TEP）（TEP组,n=64）,比较2种术式疗效。结果开放组手术时间（65.3±18.1）min,明显短于TEP组（78.1±12.6）min（t=4.742,P=0.000）。开放组住院费用（4960.2±1033.3）元,明显低于TEP组（6998.0±1632.2）元（t=8.796,P=0.000）。开放组术后24 h和1周疼痛评分明显高于TEP组（Z=-7.144,P=0.000;Z=-6.408,P=0.000）;术后住院时间（4.9±2.4）d明显长于TEP组（3.6±1.5）d（t=-3.733,P=0.000）。136例无严重并发症。开放组72例随访8～46个月,平均15个月,其中〉24个月11例;TEP组64例随访4～35个月,平均14个月,其中〉24个月9例,2组均无术后复发。结论 2种术式治疗老年腹股沟疝是安全有效的。TEP疼痛轻,恢复快,应首选,尤其适用于双侧腹股沟疝修补;开放无张力疝修补术费用低,易开展,非常适用于合并有心肺疾病无法耐受全麻或CO2气腹的老年患者。     

无张力修补术后腹股沟复发疝再手术的探讨

目的探讨腹股沟疝无张力修补术后复发的原因及再手术治疗的原则。方法对2007年1月至2009年6月间31例腹股沟疝无张力修补术后复发患者的资料进行回顾性分析。复发时间为前次术后3个月至10年,平均(32±10)个月。既往手术方式:疝环填充式修补术14例,平片修补术10例,腹腔镜无张力疝修补术5例(TAPP、TEP、IPOM术后分别有2例、2例、1例),开放式腹膜前修补术2例。结果手术时间28～86 min,平均(38±6)min。首次复发行开放式全腹膜外无张力修补12例,平片修补6例,腹腔镜下修补4例(TEP2例、TAPP2例),巨大补片加强内脏囊(GPRVS)3例。多次复发者中2例行腹腔镜下修补(包括1例TEP和1例IPOM),2例行开放式完全腹膜外无张力修补,2例GPRVS。随访时间8～52个月,平均(29±8)个月,再复发1例。结论无张力腹股沟疝修补术后复发的原因主要是术中操作不当或患者复发的高危因素处理不当。应根据复发疝的类型和性质,选择个体化的治疗方案和手术路径。     

TAPP与TEP对腹股沟疝术后慢性疼痛的影响

目的探讨腹股沟疝术式[经腹腔腹膜外无张力疝修补术(TAPP)与完全腹膜外无张力疝修补术(TEP)]对术后疼痛的影响。 方法回顾性分析昆明医科大学附属延安医院2014年3月至2015年3月收治的186例腹股沟疝患者的临床资料,其中TAPP组102例,TEP组84例,统计两组患者术后是否发生慢性疼痛及其相关例数。 结果TAPP组术后慢性疼痛发生率为7.0%(7/100),TEP组为9.9%(8/81),两组比较,差异无统计学意义 (P>0.05 )。 结论两组手术方式对腹股沟疝术后疼痛无明显影响。     

Comparison of the open tension-free mesh-plug, transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP), and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomized controlled trial

Background  

The open tension-free mesh-plug hernia technique, transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) technique, and totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic technique all are common surgical procedures for primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair. However, the choice of the right surgical procedure still is controversial in China. This study aimed to compare open tension-free hernioplasty with two laparoscopic hernia repairs.     

Surgical outcome and hospital cost analyses of laparoscopic and open tension-free hernia repair

Abstract Surgeons who favor the laparoscopic repair of groin hernias must limit the additional costs associated with this technique, which is not universally acknowledged to be superior to other less expensive open tension-free repairs. This retrospective study compared outcome and costs between laparoscopic and open tension-free hernia repair in 320 patients with inguinal hernias. Patients underwent either (a) transabdominal preperitoneal procedure (TAPP; 60 patients, 72 procedures), (b) totally extraperitoneal procedure (TEP; 174 patients, 202 procedures), or (c) open tension-free procedure (86 patients, 105 procedures). Regarding important postoperative complications there were two (3.3%) recurrences in the TAPP group and one (0.6%) in the TEP group, and six (9.9%) transient neuralgias in the TAPP group and one (1.2%) in the tension-free group. There were no deaths, no testicular atrophies, and no wound or mesh infections. The mean hospital postoperative stay was the same in the three groups (1 day). Mean operating time was shorter in the tension-free group concerning the unilateral cases and shorter in the TEP group concerning the bilateral cases. Fewer patients required analgesia during the first 6 h after the operative procedure in the TEP group than in the other two groups. The mean total costs were 483.90 euros in the open tension-free repair, 763.20 euros in the TAPP repair, and 572.50 euros in the TEP repair. The open procedure was the cheaper for the hospital. Laparoscopic hernia repair and tension-free repair as described by Gilbert are comparable in postoperative complications. TEP hernia repair is associated with less postoperative pain and earlier return to normal activities, but it is more expensive and continues to be a difficult procedure. Open tension-free repair is the least expensive method and is easier to learn than the other two procedures. Electronic Publication     

自制伞形复合补片与巴德补片治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究

目的评价用Prolene平片自制伞形复合补片在腹股沟区疝修补中的疗效、并发症和注意事项。方法172例腹股沟疝患者，治疗组85例用自制成伞形充填式复合补片行疝环充填式无张力疝修补术。对照组87例应用巴德公司进口原装的Mesh Prefix Plug补片行疝环充填式无张力疝修补术。结果所有患者全部治愈，切口甲级愈合。治疗组和对照组在手术时间、下地时间、肠功能恢复时间、切口疼痛时间、并发症等方面无显著差异，但住院总费用大大降低（P〈0．01）。结论用Prolene平片自制伞型充填式复合补片行腹股沟疝修补，手术简单易行、损伤小、时间短、痛苦小、复发率低、价格低廉，较巴德进口补片更有优势，适合基层医院开展。     

Simultaneous repair of bilateral inguinal hernias: a prospective, randomized study of open, tension-free versus laparoscopic approach

No randomized trial exists that specifically addresses the issue of laparoscopic bilateral inguinal hernia repair. The purpose of the present prospective, randomized, controlled, clinical study was to assess short- and long-term results when comparing simultaneous bilateral hernia repair by an open, tension-free anterior approach with laparoscopic "bikini mesh" posterior repair. Forty-three low-risk male patients with bilateral primary inguinal hernia were randomly assigned to undergo either laparoscopic preperitoneal "bikini mesh" hernia repair (TAPP) or open Lichtenstein hernioplasty. There was no difference in operating time between the two groups. The mean cost of laparoscopic hernioplasty was higher (P < 0.001). The intensity of postoperative pain was greater in the open hernia repair group at 24 hours, 48 hours, and 7 days after surgery (P < 0.001), with a greater consumption of pain medication among these patients (P < 0.05). The median time to return to work was 30 days for the open hernia repair group and 16 days for the laparoscopic "bikini mesh" repair group (P < 0.05). Only 1 asymptomatic recurrence (4.3%) was discovered in the open group. The laparoscopic approach to bilateral hernia with "bikini mesh" appears to be preferable to the open Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty in terms of the postoperative quality of life and interruption of occupational activity.     

Hernioplasty and simultaneous laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study of open tension-free versus laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair

BACKGROUND: The laparoscopic repair of unilateral primary groin hernia remains controversial. This randomized study evaluates the outcome of the laparoscopic technique in hernia repair in patients undergoing simultaneous laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and compares laparoscopic repair with tension-free open groin hernia repair. METHODS: Sixty-four low-risk patients with symptomatic chronic calculous cholecystitis and synchronous unilateral primary inguinal hernia were randomized to undergo either laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal mesh hernia repair (TAPP) and LC or LC and open tension-free hernia repair. RESULTS: The operating time was longer in the TAPP and LC group (mean +/- SD = 121 +/- 32 minutes) than in the LC and open group (95 +/- 27 minutes) (P <.01). The mean operating costs were higher in the TAPP and LC group ($1235 versus $1080) (P <.03). The intensity of postoperative pain at rest was greater in the LC and open group at 24 hours (P <.01) and 48 hours (P <.05), with a greater consumption of pain medication (P <.01). No differences between the 2 groups were found in terms of postoperative complications, disability period before return to work, or hernia recurrences. CONCLUSIONS: The totally laparoscopic procedure does not result in a significant benefit other than improved comfort in the first 2 postoperative days. However, laparoscopic hernia repair is considerably more difficult to perform than open tension-free hernioplasty. Thus, the totally laparoscopic approach should be performed only by experienced laparoscopic surgeons with special expertise in hernia surgery.     

Recurrence and complications after laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair: results of a prospective randomized multicenter trial

BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective randomized multicenter trial was to evaluate the recurrence rates and complications of open versus laparoscopic repairs of inguinal hernias. METHODS: Patients with primary unilateral inguinal hernias were randomized to Shouldice repair, Bassini operation, tension-free hernioplasty (Lichtenstein repair), laparoscopic transabdominal extraperitoneal hernioplasty (TEP), or laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty (TAPP). The primary outcome parameter was the rate of recurrence at 3 years. The secondary outcome was the rate of intraoperative, perioperative, and long-term complications. Follow-up comprised of clinical examination after 1, 2, and 3 years. RESULTS: Three hundred and sixty-five patients were randomly assigned to one of the five procedures. The intention-to-treat analysis showed that the cumulative 3-year recurrence rate was 3.4% in the Bassini group, 4.7% in the Shouldice group, 0% in the Lichtenstein group, 4.7% in the TAPP group, and 5.9% in the TEP group (p = 0.48). Comparing open (Bassini, Shouldice, Lichtenstein) versus laparoscopic (TAPP, TEP) techniques (p = 0.29) and comparing the use of mesh prostheses (Lichtenstein, TAPP, TEP) versus suturing techniques (Bassini, Shouldice) (p = 0.74) showed no significance in the rate of recurrence. The rates of intraoperative (p = 0.15), perioperative (p = 0.09), and long-term complications (p = 0.13) were without significance between the five groups. Comparing mesh techniques (Lichtenstein, TAPP, TEP) versus suturing techniques (Bassini, Shouldice) showed no significance in the rate of complications. The per-protocol analysis for the comparison of mesh (Lichtenstein, TAPP, TEP) versus suturing (Bassini, Shouldice) techniques revealed that recurrences (p = 0.74), intraoperative (p = 0.64), perioperative (p = 0.27), and long-term complications (p = 0.91) were evenly distributed. CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter study, no significant difference in the recurrence rate and complications between laparoscopic and open methods of hernia repair was revealed.     

猪小肠黏膜下层脱细胞基质补片在不同术式治疗青壮年腹股沟疝中的应用效果

目的:探讨猪小肠黏膜下层脱细胞基质(SIS)补片用于腹腔镜经腹腹膜前(TAPP)疝修补术与开放无张力疝修补术(Lichtenstein手术)治疗青壮年腹股沟疝临床效果。方法:回顾性分析2015年2月—2018年2月期间首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院疝和腹壁外科采用SIS补片行疝修补术的268例青壮年腹股沟疝的患者临床资料,其中152例行Lichtenstein手术(Lichtenstein组),116例行TAPP手术(TAPP)。比较两组患者的相关临床指标。结果:Lichtenstein组手术时间、住院费用明显少于TAPP组,但围术期疼痛评分明显高于TAPP组(均P0.05);两组在术中出血量、住院时间方面差异均无统计学意义(均P0.05)。Lichtenstein组术后1周及1、3个月血清肿的发生率均低于TAPP组(均P0.05)。所有患者均未发生异物感、肠梗阻、肠瘘等并发症。结论:SIS补片应用于青壮年腹股沟疝的开放和腹腔镜疝修补术均有确切的效果,但该补片用于两种术式均有各自的优缺点。     

Tension-free inguinal hernia repair: TEP versus mesh-plug versus Lichtenstein: a prospective randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To compare laparoscopic hernioplasty with two open tension-free hernia repairs. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Laparoscopic hernioplasty is associated with a short rehabilitation, but it is a technically difficult procedure. It is unclear if it has advantages over the technically easier open tension-free herniorrhaphy. METHODS: Two hundred ninety-nine men 30 to 75 years old were randomized to undergo laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal hernioplasty (TEP), open operation with mesh-plug and patch, or Lichtenstein's operation. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-four (98%) patients were followed for 19.8 +/- 8.6 months. Over 90% of the patients in all groups were operated in day surgery; the rest of the patients were all discharged within 24 hours. Postoperative pain (visual analog score) was lower in the patients undergoing TEP than in those undergoing Lichtenstein and mesh-plug procedures. The median sick-leave period was 5 days in the TEP group, 7 days in the mesh-plug group, and 7 days in the Lichtenstein group. The median time to full recovery was significantly shorter in the TEP group compared to the other two groups. There were no major complications. Two recurrences were found in the TEP group and two in the mesh-plug group. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic hernioplasty is superior to tension-free open herniorrhaphy in terms of postoperative pain and rehabilitation.