Synthesis and antinociceptive effects of endomorphin-1 analogs with C-terminal linked by oligoarginine

Endomorphins (EMs) cannot be delivered into the central nervous system (CNS) in sufficient quantity to elicit antinociception when given systemically because they are severely restricted by the blood-brain barrier (BBB). In the present study, we investigated herein a series of EM-1 analogs with C-terminal linked by oligoarginine in order to improve the brain delivery and antinociception after systemic administration. Indeed, all these analogs decreased the opioid receptor affinity and in vitro pharmacological activity. Moreover, analogs 4, 7-9 produced a less potent antinociceptive activity after intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration, with the ED₅₀ values about 11- to 13-fold lower potencies than that of EM-1. Nevertheless, our results revealed that EM-1 failed to induce any significant antinociception at a dose of 50 μmol/kg after subcutaneous (s.c.) administration, whereas equimolar dose of these four analogs produced a little low but significant antinociceptive effects. Naloxone (10 nmol/kg, i.c.v.) significantly blocked the antinociceptive effects, indicating an opioid and central mechanism. These results demonstrated that C-terminal of EM-1 linked to oligoarginine improved the brain delivery, eliciting potent antinociception following peripheral administration.     

Drug design and synthesis of epsilon opioid receptor agonist: 17-(cyclopropylmethyl)-4,5alpha-epoxy-3,6beta-dihydroxy-6,14-endoethenomorphinan-7alpha-(N-methyl-N-phenethyl)carboxamide (TAN-821) inducing antinociception mediated by putative epsilon opioid receptor

Here we report the new drug design and synthesis of a series of 6,14-endoethenomorphinan-7-carboxamide derivatives as a putative epsilon opioid receptor agonist. One of these compounds, 17-(cyclopropylmethyl)-4,5alpha-epoxy-3,6beta-dihydroxy-6,14-endoethenomorphinan-7alpha-(N-methyl-N-phenethyl)carboxamide (TAN-821), showed agonistic activity for a putative epsilon opioid receptor (IC(50) = 71.71nM) in the rat vas deferens (RVD) preparations. TAN-821 stimulated the binding of the nonhydrolyzable guanosine 5'-triphosphate analog, guanosine 5'-(gamma-thio)-triphosphate (GTPgammaS), to the mouse pons/medulla membrane via the activation of putative epsilon opioid receptor. Moreover, TAN-821 given intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) produced a marked antinociception in the tail-flick test (ED(50) = 1.73 microg) and the hot-plate test (ED(50) = 2.05 microg) in a dose-dependent manner. The antinociception induced by TAN-821 administered i.c.v. was blocked by the i.c.v.-pretreatment with a putative epsilon opioid receptor partial agonist beta-endorphin [1-27], but not a mu opioid receptor antagonist beta-FNA, a delta opioid receptor antagonist NTI, or a kappa opioid receptor antagonist nor-BNI. The present results suggest that TAN-821 may be a useful tool for the investigation on the pharmacological properties of the putative epsilon opioid receptor.     

Antagonism of phosphoramidon-induced antinociception in mice by mu- but not kappa-opioid receptor blockers

Intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of the neutral endopeptidase 24.11-inhibitor phosphoramidon evoked a dose-dependent antinociceptive effect in the mouse acetic acid abdominal constriction test. The present study was conducted to identify the opioid receptor subtype(s) that mediate phosphoramidon antinociception in this paradigm. Mice were pretreated with different opioid antagonists prior to being challenged with phosphoramidon, i.c.v., the mu-opioid agonist sufentanil, s.c., or the kappa-opioid agonist U-50,488H, s.c. Naltrexone significantly attenuated phosphoramidon-induced antinociception at an i.c.v. dose that also blocked both sufentanil and U-50,488H. The mu-opioid antagonist beta-funaltrexamine (beta-FNA) blocked phosphoramidon and sufentanil at an i.c.v. dose that did not block U-50,488H. The kappa-opioid antagonist nor-binaltorphimine (nor-BNI) produced dose-related effects. A low dose (10 microg) of nor-BNI had no effect on either phosphoramidon or sufentanil but did reduce U-50,488H antinociception. A higher dose (30 microg) of nor-BNI blocked phosphoramidon, sufentanil, and U-50,488H, suggesting a loss of kappa-opioid receptor selectivity at this dose. These findings suggest that mu- but not kappa-opioid receptors mediate phosphoramidon-induced antinociception in the abdominal constriction test.     

Enhancement of experimental pruritus and mechanically evoked dysesthesiae with local anesthesia

Pain reduces itch-a commonly known effect of scratching the skin. Experimentally produced itch from histamine is sometimes accompanied by secondary sensations of pain. The present study investigated the effects of eliminating this pain, by means of a local anesthetic, on the itch and the enhanced mechanically evoked itch and pain that occur after an intradermal injection of histamine. In ten human subjects, the volar forearm was injected with either 20 microl of 2% chloroprocaine (experimental arm), or 20 microl of saline (control arm). Histamine 10 microl was injected into each bleb, and the resulting magnitude of itch estimated. The borders of three cutaneous areas were mapped within which mechanical stimulation of the skin surrounding the bleb elicited abnormal sensations (dysesthesiae): alloknesis, defined as itch evoked by innocuous stroking, and hyperalgesia and hyperknesis, characterized, respectively, by enhanced pain and enhanced itch evoked by pricking the skin with a fine tipped filament. The magnitude and duration of itch were significantly greater and the areas of dysesthesia significantly larger for the experimental than for the control arm. It is hypothesized that there exist two classes of histamine-sensitive primary afferent neurons. One class is "pruritic", and mediates itch whereas the other is "antipruritic", and evokes a centrally mediated reduction in histamine-evoked itch and dysesthesiae. It is further suggested that the anesthetic blocked the discharges of the antipruritic afferents, preventing the central inhibition from occurring and thereby unmasking the effects of the pruritic afferents.     

Synthesis and evaluation of novel peripherally restricted kappa-opioid receptor agonists

A series of 3-substituted analogs (3) of the parent kappa agonist, 1, were prepared to limit access to the central nervous system. With the exception of compound 3j, all other compounds bound to the human kappa opioid receptor with high affinity (K(i)=0.31-9.5 nM) and were selective for kappa over mu and delta opioid receptors. Compounds 3c, d, and 3g-i produced potent antinociceptive activity in the rat formalin assay (i.paw) and the mouse acetic acid-induced writhing assay (s.c.), with weak activity in the mouse platform sedation test. The peripheral restriction indices of 3c, d, 3g, and 3i were improved 2- to 7-fold compared to the parent compound 1, and these compounds were approximately 2- to 5-fold more potent than the peripheral kappa agonist ICI 204448.     

Discovery of two novel branched peptidomimetics containing endomorphin-2 and RF9 pharmacophores: Synthesis and neuropharmacological evaluation

It is well known that opioid analgesics produce side effects including tolerance and constipation. Since neuropeptide FF (NPFF) receptor antagonists reversed opioid-induced hyperalgesia and analgesic tolerance, the present work was performed to synthetize two branched peptidomimetics, EKR and RKE, containing the opioid peptide endomorphin-2 (EM-2) and the NPFF receptor antagonist RF9. Our data obtained from the in vitro cyclic adenosine monophosphate experiment demonstrated that EKR functioned as a mixed mu-, delta-opioid receptors agonist and NPFF₁ receptor antagonist/NPFF₂ receptor partial agonist, whereas RKE acted as a multi-functional peptidomimetic with the mu-opioid agonism and the NPFF₁ antagonism/NPFF₂ partial agonism. Furthermore, EKR and RKE completely blocked the NPFF₂ receptor-mediated neurite outgrowth of Neuro 2A cells. In vivo antinociception studies found that supraspinal administration of EKR and RKE dose-dependently produced potent antinociception via the mu-opioid receptor in the tail-flick test. In carrageenan inflammatory pain model, spinal administration of EKR and RKE induced dose-related analgesia, which was significantly reduced by the opioid antagonist naloxone and the NPFF antagonist RF9. Notably, compared with morphine, intracerebroventricular repeated administration of EKR and RKE maintained prolonged antinociceptive effectiveness. In addition, at the antinociceptive doses, these two branched peptidomimetics did not significantly inhibit gastrointestinal transit. Taken together, the present work suggest that EKR and RKE behave as multi-functional ligands with the opioid agonism and the NPFF₁ antagonism/NPFF₂ partial agonism, and produce prolonged antinociception with limited side effects. Moreover, our results imply that EKR and RKE might be interesting pharmacological tools for further investigating the biological function of the NPFF and opioid systems.     

Localization of mu-opioid receptor 1A on sensory nerve fibers in human skin

Opioid peptides are endogenous neuromodulators that play a major role in the nociceptive pathway by interacting with opioid receptors. So far, four opioid receptors (micro-, delta-, kappa-, orphan-receptor) have been cloned with a wide distribution in the central and peripheral nervous system. In the present study, we give first evidence for the presence of the micro-opioid receptor (MOR) isoform 1A in nerve fibers of human skin. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed MOR immunoreactivity to be present in dermal and epidermal nerve fibers. Double-immunofluorescence staining revealed that MOR is present on calcitonin gene-related protein (CGRP)-positive sensory nerve fibers, while autonomic nerves of blood vessels, hair follicles, or skin glands were negative. In diseased skin such as psoriasis vulgaris, atopic dermatitis, and prurigo nodularis, distribution of MOR 1A immunoreactivity was similar to that of normal skin. These findings expand our knowledge about a direct regulatory role of cutaneous opioid receptors in the skin. Thus, peripheral cutaneous opioid receptors may be involved in the transmission of pain and pruritus, respectively. This is supported by previous observation that opioid receptor antagonists may significantly diminish experimentally evoked histamine-induced itch of the skin. Together, our findings contribute to the understanding of the high antipruritic potency of opioid receptor antagonists in various skin and systemic diseases.     

Supraspinal injection of Substance P attenuates allodynia and hyperalgesia in a rat model of inflammatory pain

The neuropeptide Substance P (SP), that has a high affinity for the neurokinin 1 (NK1) receptor, is involved in modulation of pain transmission. Although SP is thought to have excitatory actions and promote nociception in the spinal cord, the peptide induces analgesia at the supraspinal level. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of supraspinal SP and the NK1 receptor in inflammatory pain induced by injection of carrageenan in the hind paw of the rat. There are two nociceptive behavioral responses associated with this pain state: mechanical allodynia and heat hyperalgesia. Because the NK1 receptor colocalizes with the MOP receptor in supraspinal sites involved in pain modulation, we also decided to study the possible involvement of the opioid system on SP-induced analgesia. We found that treatment with SP, at doses of 3.5, 5 and 7 μg/5 μl/rat i.c.v., clearly showed inhibition of allodynia and hyperalgesia. Pretreatment with the selective NK1 antagonist L-733,060 (10mg/kg i.p.) blocked the SP-induced analgesia, suggesting the involvement of the NK1 receptor. This SP-induced analgesia was significantly reduced by administration of the opioid antagonist naloxone (3mg/kg s.c.). This reduction occurred when SP was administered either before or after the carrageenan injection. These results suggest a significant antinociceptive role for SP and the NK1 receptor in inflammatory pain at the supraspinal level, possibly through the release of endogenous opioids.     

In vitro and in vivo characterization of opioid activities of C-terminal esterified endomorphin-2 analogs

Previously, we have synthesized a series of endomorphin-2 (EM-2) analogs by the substitution of C-terminal amide group. In the present study, to further our knowledge of the influence of C-terminal esterified modification on the pharmacological activities, we investigated the in vitro and in vivo opioid activities of C-terminal esterified EM-2 analogs 1–3. Our results showed that the ED₅₀ values on contractions of the longitudinal muscle of distal colon induced by analogs 1–3 were about 1.5-fold higher, 2- and 8-fold lower than EM-2, respectively. In addition, intravenous (i.v.) injections of analogs 1 and 2 dose-dependently decreased the system arterial pressure (SAP) and heart rate (HR) in anesthetized rats, but the degree of the hypotension and bradycardia was significantly smaller relative to the parent. Moreover, analog 3 was almost ineffective. Nevertheless, all these analogs produced potent antinociception in the tail-flick test after intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection, and this antinociception was inhibited by naloxone, indicating an opioid mechanism. In summary, these results gave the evidence that the conversion of C-terminal amide to esterified modification may play an important role in the regulation of opioid affinities and pharmacological activities.     

Involvement of spinal kappa opioid receptors in the antagonistic effect of dynorphins on morphine antinociception.

The modulatory effects of intrathecally (i.t.) administered dynorphin A(1-17) and dynorphin A(1-13) on morphine antinociception have been studied previously in rats by other investigators. However, both potentiating and attenuating effects have been reported. In this study, the modulatory effects of i.t. administered dynorphin A(1-17) as well as the smaller fragment, dynorphin A(1-8), were studied in mice. In addition, nor-binaltorphimine (nor-BNI), a highly selective kappa opioid receptor antagonist, and naltrindole (NTI), a highly selective delta opioid receptor antagonist, were used to characterize the possible involvement of spinal kappa and delta opioid receptors in the modulatory effects of the dynorphins. Dynorphin A(1-17) and dynorphin A(1-8) administered i.t. at doses that did not alter tail-flick latencies, were both able to antagonize in a dose-dependent manner, the antinociceptive action of s.c. administered morphine sulfate. The antinociceptive ED50 of morphine sulfate was increased 3.9- and 5.3-fold by 0.4 nmol/mouse of dynorphin A(1-17) and dynorphin A(1-8), respectively. Injections of 0.4 and 0.8 nmol/mouse of nor-BNI i.t., but not its inactive enantiomer (+)-1-nor-BNI, inhibited dose-dependently the antagonistic effects of the dynorphins. These doses of nor-BNI alone did not affect the antinociceptive action of morphine sulfate. Intrathecal administration of 5 nmol/mouse of NTI also did not affect the modulatory effects of dynorphins. These observations that dynorphins exert their antagonistic effects on morphine-induced antinociception stereoselectively through spinal kappa opioid receptors may suggest a coupling between spinal kappa and mu opioid receptors.     

In vivo characterization of the effects of ghrelin on the modulation of acute pain at the supraspinal level in mice

Ghrelin, an acylated peptide produced in the stomach, increases food intake and growth hormone secretion, inhibits pro-inflammatory cascade, etc. Ghrelin and its receptor (GHS-R1a) mRNA were found in the area related to the regions for controlling pain transmission, such as the hypothalamus, the midbrain, the spinal cord, etc. Ghrelin has been shown to have antinociceptive activity and also anti-inflammatory properties in inflammatory pain and chronic neuropathic pain. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of ghrelin for the first time in the acute pain modulation at the supraspinal level, using the tail withdrawal test and hot-plate test in mice. Intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of ghrelin (mouse, 0.1–3 nmol) produced a dose- and time-related antinociceptive effect in the tail withdrawal test and hot-plate test, respectively. Antinociceptive effect elicited by ghrelin (i.c.v., 1 nmol) was significantly antagonized by opioid receptor antagonist naloxone (i.c.v., 10 nmol co-injection or i.p., 10 mg/kg, 10 min prior to ghrelin) in both tail withdrawal test and hot-plate test. At these doses, naloxone significantly antagonized the antinociceptive effect induced by morphine (i.c.v., 3 nmol). Ghrelin (i.c.v., 1 nmol)-induced antinociception was significantly antagonized by co-injection with 10 nmol [d-Lys3]-GHRP-6, the selective antagonist of GHS-R1a identified more recently, while [d-Lys3]-GHRP-6 (10 nmol) alone induced neither hyperalgesia nor antinociception. Overall this data indicate that ghrelin could produce antinociception through an interaction with GHS-R1a and with the central opioid system. Thus ghrelin may be a promising peptide for developing new analgesic drugs.     

Enhancement of experimental pruritus and mechanically evoked dysesthesiae with local anesthesia

Pain reduces itch - a commonly known effect of scratching the skin. Experimentally produced itch from histamine is sometimes accompanied by secondary sensations of pain. The present study investigated the effects of eliminating this pain, by means of a local anesthetic, on the itch and the enhanced mechanically evoked itch and pain that occur after an intradermal injection of histamine. In ten human subjects, the volar forearm was injected with either 20 mul of 2% chloroprocaine (experimental arm), or 20 mul of saline (control arm). Histamine 10 mul was injected into each bleb, and the resulting magnitude of itch estimated. The borders of three cutaneous areas were mapped within which mechanical stimulation of the skin surrounding the bleb elicited abnormal sensations (dysesthesiae): alloknesis, defined as itch evoked by innocuous stroking, and hyperalgesia and hyperknesis, characterized, respectively, by enhanced pain and enhanced itch evoked by pricking the skin with a fine tipped filament. The magnitude and duration of itch were significantly greater and the areas of dysesthesia significantly larger for the experimental than for the control arm. It is hypothesized that there exist two classes of histamine-sensitive primary afferent neurons. One class is 'pruritic', and mediates itch whereas the other is 'antipruritic', and evokes a centrally mediated reduction in histamine-evoked itch and dysesthesiae. It is further suggested that the anesthetic blocked the discharges of the antipruritic afferents, preventing the central inhibition from occurring and thereby unmasking the effects of the pruritic afferents.     

Morphine tolerance in mice changes response of heroin from mu to delta opioid receptors

Heroin produced antinociception in the tail flick test through mu receptors in the brain of ICR and CD-1 mice, a response inhibited by 3-O-methylnaltrexone. Tolerance to morphine was produced by subcutaneous morphine pellet implantation. By the third day, the heroin response was produced through delta opioid receptors. The response was inhibited by simultaneous intracerebroventricular (i.c. v.) administration of naltrindole, a delta opioid receptor antagonist. More specifically, delta1 rather than delta2 receptors were involved because 7-benzylidenenaltrexone, a delta1 receptor antagonist, inhibited but naltriben, a delta2 antagonist, did not. Also, antinociception produced by i.c.v. heroin was inhibited by intrathecal administration of bicuculline and picrotoxin consistent with the concept that delta1 receptors in the brain mediated the antinociceptive response through descending neuronal pathways to the spinal cord to activate GABAA and GABAB receptors rather than spinal alpha2-adrenergic and serotonergic receptors activated originally by the mu agonist action in naive mice. The mu response of 6-monoacetylmorphine, a metabolite of heroin, was changed by morphine pellet implantation to a delta2 response (inhibited by naltriben but not 7-benzylidenenaltrexone). The agonist action of morphine in these morphine-tolerant mice remained mu. Thus, the opioid receptor selectivity of heroin and 6-monoacetylmorphine in the brain is changed by production of tolerance to morphine. Such a change explains how morphine tolerant mice are not cross-tolerant to heroin.     

Spinal δ2 but not δ1 opioid receptors are involved in intracereboventricular β-endorphin-induced antinociception in the mouse

The antinociception induced by β-endorphin given intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) has been previously demonstrated to be mediated by the release of Met-enkephalin and subsequent stimulation of δ receptors in the spinal cord for antinociception. The present study was designed to determine what type of opioid receptor, δ1 or δ2, in the spinal cord is involved in i.c.v. β-endorphin-induced antinociception. Antinociception was assessed by the tail-flick test in male ICR mice. NTB (0.2–20 nmol) and NTI0 (0.22–2.2 nmol),selective δ2 receptor antagonists, given intrathecally (i.t.) dose-dependently attenuated i.c.v. β-endorphin-induced inhibition of the tail-flick response. On the other hand, BNTX (0.02–2.2 nmol), a selective δ1 receptor antagonist, given i.t., did not block i.c.v. β-endorphin-induced antinociception. The tail-flick inhibition induced by DAMGO, a μ receptor agonist, or U50,488H, a к receptor agonist, was not blocked by i.t. BNTX, NTB or NTI. It is concluded that δ2 but not δ1 receptors in the spinal cord are involved in i.c.v. β-endorphin-induced antinociception.     

Differential antagonism of endomorphin-1 and endomorphin-2 supraspinal antinociception by naloxonazine and 3-methylnaltrexone

To determine if different subtypes of mu-opioid receptors were involved in antinociception induced by endomorphin-1 and endomorphin-2, the effect of pretreatment with various mu-opioid receptor antagonists beta-funaltrexamine, naloxonazine and 3-methylnaltrexone on the inhibition of the paw-withdrawal induced by endomorphin-1 and endomorphin-2 given intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) were studied in ddY male mice. The inhibition of the paw-withdrawal induced by i.c.v. administration of endomorphin-1, endomorphin-2 or DAMGO was completely blocked by the pretreatment with a selective mu-opioid receptor antagonist beta-funaltrexamine (40 mg/kg), indicating that the antinociception induced by all these peptides are mediated by the stimulation of mu-opioid receptors. However, naloxonazine, a mu1-opioid receptor antagonist pretreated s.c. for 24h was more effective in blocking the antinociception induced by endomorphin-2, than by endomorphin-1 or DAMGO given i.c.v. Pretreatment with a selective morphine-6 beta-glucuronide blocker 3-methylnaltrexone 0.25mg/kg given s.c. for 25 min or co-administration of 3-methylnaltrexone 2.5 ng given i.c.v. effectively attenuated the antinociception induced by endomorphin-2 given i.c.v. and co-administration of 3-methylnaltrexone shifted the dose-response curves for endomorphin-2 induced antinociception to the right by 4-fold. The administration of 3-methylnaltrexone did not affect the antinociception induced by endomorphin-1 or DAMGO given i.c.v. Our results indicate that the antinociception induced by endomorphin-2 is mediated by the stimulation of subtypes of mu-opioid receptor, which is different from that of mu-opioid receptor subtype stimulation by endomorphin-1 and DAMGO.     

Study on the molecular mechanism of antinociception induced by ghrelin in acute pain in mice

Ghrelin has been identified as the endogenous ligand for the GHS-R1α (growth hormone secretagogue receptor 1 alpha). Our previous experiments have indicated that ghrelin (i.c.v.) induces antinociceptive effects in acute pain in mice, and the effects were mediated through the central opioid receptors and GHS-R1α. However, which opioid receptor (OR) mediates the antinociceptive effects and the molecular mechanisms are also needed to be further explored. In the present study, the antinociceptive effects of ghrelin (i.c.v.) could be fully antagonized by δ-opioid receptor antagonist NTI. Furthermore, the mRNA and protein levels of δ-opioid peptide PENK and δ-opioid receptor OPRD were increased after i.c.v injection of ghrelin. Thus, it showed that the antinociception of ghrelin was correlated with the GHS-R1α and δ-opioid receptors. To explore which receptor was firstly activated by ghrelin, GHS-R1α antagonist [D-Lys³]-GHRP-6 was co-injection (i.c.v.) with deltorphin II (selective δ-opioid receptor agonist). Finally, the antinociception induced by deltorphin II wasn’t blocked by the co-injection (i.c.v.) of [D-Lys³]-GHRP-6, indicating that the GHS-R1α isn’t on the backward position of δ-opioid receptor. The results suggested that i.c.v. injection of ghrelin initially activated the GHS-R1α, which in turn increased the release of endogenous PENK to activation of OPRD to produce antinociception.     

Mechanism of action of antipruritic drugs.

Astemizole and terfenadine, two potent non-sedative H1 antihistamines, had no effect on itch measured objectively as nocturnal scratching and subjectively on a 10 cm line. Trimeprazine, however, a more sedative but less potent H1 antihistamine, was antipruritic, as was nitrazepam, a sedative benzodiazepine. We concluded (a) that antipruritic drugs act centrally by a property related to sedation; (b) H1 receptor antagonists have a peripheral antipruritic action only when itch is due to histamine release, as in the wealing disorders. Thus the new nonsedative H1 antihistamines have no place in the treatment of itch from other causes.     

Neurotensin-induced antinociception and hypothermia in mice: antagonism by TRH and structural analogs of TRH

Intracisternal (IC) administration of neurotensin (NT) in a dose of 10 micrograms produced a significant hypothermia and antinociception in the hot-plate test in mice. Both of these effects of IC NT were completely antagonized by concomitant administration of equimolar doses of thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) and several TRH congeners including 3-methyl-His-TRH (pGlu-3-methyl-His-Pro-NH2), MK-771 (pyro-2-aminoadipyl-histidyl-thiazolidine-4-carboxamide), beta-ala-TRH (pGlu-His-Pro-beta-ala-NH2), and RX-77368 (pGlu-His-dimethyl-Pro-NH2). The antagonism by TRH and TRH analogs on NT-induced hypothermia and antinociception was dose-dependent. Of particular interest was the finding that RX-77368 not only blocked the effects of NT but also produced hyperalgesia. It appears that TRH analogs that are more resistant to biologic degradation are, like TRH, capable of blocking NT-induced behaviors.     

Lack of antinociceptive cross-tolerance between intracerebroventricularly administered beta-endorphin and morphine or DPDPE in mice

Antinociceptive tolerance and cross-tolerance to intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) beta-endorphin, morphine, and DPDPE (D-Pen2-D-Pen5-enkephalin) induced by a prior i.c.v. administration of beta-endorphin, morphine and DPDPE, respectively, were studied in mice. Acute tolerance was induced by i.c.v. pretreatment with beta-endorphin (0.58 nmol), morphine (6 nmol) and DPDPE (31 nmol) for 120, 180 and 75 min, respectively. Various doses of beta-endorphin, morphine or DPDPE were then injected. The tail-flick and hot-plate tests were used as antinociceptive tests. Pretreatment of mice with beta-endorphin i.c.v. reduced inhibition of the tail-flick and hot-plate responses to i.c.v. administered beta-endorphin, but not morphine and DPDPE. Pretreatment of mice with morphine i.c.v. reduced inhibition of the tail-flick and hot-plate responses to morphine but not beta-endorphin. Pretreatment of mice with DPDPE reduced inhibition of the tail-flick and hot-plate responses to DPDPE but not beta-endorphin. The results indicate that one injection of beta-endorphin, morphine or DPDPE induces acute antinociceptive tolerance to its own distinctive opioid receptor and does not induce cross-tolerance to other opioid agonists with different opioid receptor specificities. The data support the hypothesis that beta-endorphin, morphine and DPDPE produce antinociception by stimulating specific epsilon, mu- and delta-opioid receptors, respectively.     

Modulation of acute morphine tolerance by corticotropin-releasing factor and dynorphin A in the mouse spinal cord.

Previously, we have demonstrated that intrathecally (i.t.) administered corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) in mice produces stimulus-specific antinociception and modulation of morphine-induced antinociception by mechanisms involving spinal kappa opioid receptors. Recently, we also have found that CRF releases immunoreactive dynorphin A, a putative endogenous kappa opioid receptor agonist, from superfused mice spinal cords in vitro. Dynorphin A administered intracerebroventricularlly (i.c.v.) to mice has been shown to modulate the expression of morphine tolerance. In the present study, the possible modulatory effects of i.t. administered CRF as well as dynorphin A on morphine tolerance were studied in an acute tolerance model. Subcutaneous administration of 100 mg/kg of morphine sulfate (MS) to mice caused an acute tolerance to morphine-induced antinociception. The antinociceptive ED50 of MS was increased from 4.4 mg/kg (naive mice) to 17.9 mg/kg (4 hours after the injection of 100 mg/kg MS). To study the modulatory effects of spinally administered CRF and dynorphin A on the expression of morphine tolerance, CRF and dynorphin A were injected i.t. at 15 min and 5 min, respectively, before testing the tolerant mice by the tail-flick assay. The antinociceptive ED50 of MS in tolerant mice was decreased to 8.8 mg/kg and 7.1 mg/kg, respectively, after i.t. administration of CRF (0.1 nmol) and dynorphin A (0.2 nmol). In contrast, 0.5 nmol of alpha-helical CRF (9-41), a CRF antagonist and 0.4 nmol of norbinaltorphimine, a highly selective kappa opioid receptor antagonist, when administered i.t. at 15 min before the tail-flick test in tolerant mice, increased the antinociceptive ED50 of MS to 56.6 mg/kg and 88.8 mg/kg, respectively. These data confirmed the modulatory effect of dynorphin A on morphine tolerance and suggested that CRF, which releases dynorphin A in several central nervous system regions, also plays a modulatory role in the expression of morphine tolerance.