Abscisic acid catabolism enhances dormancy release of grapevine buds

The molecular mechanism regulating dormancy release in grapevine buds is as yet unclear. It was formerly proposed that dormancy is maintained by abscisic acid (ABA)‐mediated repression of bud–meristem activity and that removal of this repression triggers dormancy release. It was also proposed that such removal of repression may be achieved via natural or artificial up‐regulation of VvA8H‐CYP707A4, which encodes ABA 8′‐hydroxylase, and is the most highly expressed paralog in grapevine buds. The current study further examines these assumptions, and its experiments reveal that (a) hypoxia and ethylene, stimuli of bud dormancy release, enhance expression of VvA8H‐CYP707A4 within grape buds, (b) the VvA8H‐CYP707A4 protein accumulates during the natural transition to the dormancy release stage, and (c) transgenic vines overexpressing VvA8H‐CYP707A4 exhibit increased ABA catabolism and significant enhancement of bud break in controlled and natural environments and longer basal summer laterals. The results suggest that VvA8H‐CYP707A4 functions as an ABA degrading enzyme, and are consistent with a model in which the VvA8H‐CYP707A4 level in the bud is up‐regulated by natural and artificial bud break stimuli, which leads to increased ABA degradation capacity, removal of endogenous ABA‐mediated repression, and enhanced regrowth. Interestingly, it also hints at sharing of regulatory steps between latent and lateral bud outgrowth.     

Histone modification and signalling cascade of the dormancy‐associated MADS‐box gene,PpMADS13‐1, in Japanese pear (Pyrus pyrifolia) during endodormancy

Dormancy‐associated MADS‐box (DAM) genes play an important role in endodormancy phase transition. We investigated histone modification in the DAM homolog (PpMADS13‐1) from Japanese pear, via chromatin immunoprecipitation–quantitative PCR, to understand the mechanism behind the reduced expression of the PpMADS13‐1 gene towards endodormancy release. Our results indicated that the reduction in the active histone mark by trimethylation of the histone H3 tail at lysine 4 contributed to the reduction of PpMADS13‐1 expression towards endodormancy release. In contrast, the inactive histone mark by trimethylation of the histone H3 tail at lysine 27 in PpMADS13‐1 locus was quite low, and these levels were more similar to a negative control [normal mouse immunoglobulin G (IgG)] than to a positive control (AGAMOUS) in endodormancy phase transition. The loss of histone variant H2A.Z also coincided with the down‐regulation of PpMADS13‐1. Subsequently, we investigated the PpMADS13‐1 signalling cascade and found that PpCBF2, a pear C‐repeated binding factor, regulated PpMADS13‐1 expression via interaction of PpCBF2 with the 5′‐upstream region of PpMADS13‐1 by transient reporter assay. Furthermore, transient reporter assay confirmed no interaction between the PpMADS13‐1 protein and the pear FLOWERING LOCUS T genes. Taken together, our results enhance understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying endodormancy phase transition in Japanese pear.     

Effects of postharvest storage and dormancy status on ABA content, metabolism, and expression of genes involved in ABA biosynthesis and metabolism in potato tuber tissues

At harvest, and for an indeterminate period thereafter, potato tubers will not sprout and are physiologically dormant. Abscisic acid (ABA) has been shown to play a critical role in tuber dormancy control but the mechanisms controlling ABA content during dormancy as well as the sites of ABA synthesis and catabolism are unknown. As a first step in defining the sites of synthesis and cognate processes regulating ABA turnover during storage and dormancy progression, gene sequences encoding the ABA biosynthetic enzymes zeaxanthin epoxidase (ZEP) and 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase (NCED) and three catabolism-related genes were used to quantify changes in their relative mRNA abundances in three specific tuber tissues (meristems, their surrounding periderm and underlying cortex) by qRT-PCR. During storage, StZEP expression was relatively constant in meristems, exhibited a biphasic pattern in periderm with transient increases during early and mid-to-late-storage, and peaked during mid-storage in cortex. Expression of two members of the potato NCED gene family was found to correlate with changes in ABA content in meristems (StNCED2) and cortex (StNCED1). Conversely, expression patterns of three putative ABA-8′-hydroxylase (CYP707A) genes during storage varied in a tissue-specific manner with expression of two of these genes rising in meristems and periderm and declining in cortex during storage. These results suggest that ABA synthesis and metabolism occur in all tuber tissues examined and that tuber ABA content during dormancy is the result of a balance of synthesis and metabolism that increasingly favors catabolism as dormancy ends and may be controlled at the level of StNCED and StCYP707A gene activities Electronic supplementary material Electronic supplementary material is available for this article at and accessible for authorised users.     

Abscisic Acid Analysis in Vitis vinifera in the Period of Endogenous Bud Dormancy by High Pressure Liquid Chromatography

In buds and nodes of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Riesling, the content of abscisic acid (ABA) was measured by high pressure liquid chromatography and related to bud dormancy. In the period of endogenous bud dormancy (rate of bud break is low or zero under favourable climatic conditions) the ABA content increased twelvefold. This indicates a causal relationship between endogenous bud dormancy and ABA.     

Vegetative axillary bud dormancy induced by shade and defoliation signals in the grasses

Vegetative axillary bud dormancy and outgrowth is regulated by several hormonal and environmental signals. In perennials, the dormancy induced by hormonal and environmental signals has been categorized as eco-, endo- or para-dormancy. Over the past several decades para-dormancy has primarily been investigated in eudicot annuals. Recently, we initiated a study using the monoculm phyB mutant (phyB-1) and the freely branching near isogenic wild type (WT) sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) to identify molecular mechanisms and signaling pathways regulating dormancy and outgrowth of axillary buds in the grasses. In a paper published in the January 2010 issue of Plant Cell and Environment, we reported the role of branching genes in the inhibition of bud outgrowth by phyB, shade and defoliation signals. Here we present a model that depicts the molecular mechanisms and pathways regulating axillary bud dormancy induced by shade and defoliation signals in the grasses.Key words: axillary bud, dormancy, shade, phytochrome, defoliation, shoot branching, teosinte branched1, MAX2, cell cycle, sorghumThe dormancy and outgrowth of axillary buds is regulated by several plant hormones such as auxin, cytokinins, abscisic acid and strigolactones, and by environmental factors such as light quality, quantity and duration as well as water, temperature and nutrient status.^1–3 Since the fate of an axillary bud is regulated by such diverse hormonal and environmental signals and their interactions, the type of dormancy induced varies. In perennials, three types of bud dormancy have been identified.^4,5 Dormancy mediated by factors within the bud is known as endo-dormancy; while dormancy induced by factors within the plant but outside the bud is called paradormancy or correlative inhibition; the best known example being apical dominance. Dormancy induced due to unfavorable environmental conditions is known as eco-dormancy. Although there is an indepth knowledge about para-dormancy in annuals,⁶ few studies have been conducted on eco-dormancy. Similarly, studies of endo-dormancy have largely been restricted to low-temperature mediated growth-cessation of axillary buds of perennial plants.^7,8 To understand the regulation of dormancy and outgrowth of axillary buds in monocots, we initiated a study on the molecular mechanisms inhibiting bud outgrowth by shade and defoliation signals in sorghum. Our results published in the January 2010 issue of Plant, Cell & Environment indicate that different types of dormancy may be induced in axillary buds of annual grasses by various signals and there may be overlapping and independent molecular mechanisms mediating induction of axillary bud dormancy.     

Periodicity of response to abscisic acid in lateral buds of willow (Salix viminalis L.)

Aseptically cultured lateral buds of Salix viminalis L. collected from field-grown trees exhibited a clear periodicity in their ability to respond to exogenous abscisic acid (ABA). Buds were kept unopened by ABA only when the plants were dormant or entering dormancy. Short days alone did not induce bud dormancy in potted plants but ABA treatment following exposure to an 8-h photoperiod prevented bud opening although ABA treatment of buds from long-day plants did not. Naturally dormant buds taken from shoots of field-grown trees and cultured in the presence of ABA opened following a chilling treatment. In no cases were the induction and breaking of dormancy and response to ABA correlated with endogenous ABA levels in the buds.Abbreviations ABA abscisic acid - GA₃ gibberellic acid - HPLC high-performance liquid chromatography - LD long day - MeABA methyl ABA - PAR photosynthetically active radiation - SD short day     

AtPER1 enhances primary seed dormancy and reduces seed germination by suppressing the ABA catabolism and GA biosynthesis in Arabidopsis seeds

Seed is vital to the conservation of germplasm and plant biodiversity. Seed dormancy is an adaptive trait in numerous seed‐plant species, enabling plants to survive under stressful conditions. Seed dormancy is mainly controlled by abscisic acid (ABA) and gibberellin (GA) and can be classified as primary and secondary seed dormancy. The primary seed dormancy is induced by maternal ABA. Here we found that AtPER1, a seed‐specific peroxiredoxin, is involved in enhancing primary seed dormancy. Two loss‐of‐function atper1 mutants, atper1‐1 and atper1‐2, displayed suppressed primary seed dormancy accompanied with reduced ABA and increased GA contents in seeds. Furthermore, atper1 mutant seeds were insensitive to abiotic stresses during seed germination. The expression of several ABA catabolism genes (CYP707A1, CYP707A2, and CYP707A3) and GA biosynthesis genes (GA20ox1, GA20ox3, and KAO3) in atper1 mutant seeds was increased compared to wild‐type seeds. The suppressed primary seed dormancy of atper1‐1 was completely reduced by deletion of CYP707A genes. Furthermore, loss‐of‐function of AtPER1 cannot enhance the seed germination ratio of aba2‐1 or ga1‐t, suggesting that AtPER1‐enhanced primary seed dormancy is dependent on ABA and GA. Additionally, the level of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in atper1 mutant seeds was significantly higher than that in wild‐type seeds. Taken together, our results demonstrate that AtPER1 eliminates ROS to suppress ABA catabolism and GA biosynthesis, and thus improves the primary seed dormancy and make the seeds less sensitive to adverse environmental conditions.     

Seasonal shifts in dormancy status, carbohydrate metabolism, and related gene expression in crown buds of leafy spurge

Crown buds of field-grown leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula L.) were examined to determine relationships between carbohydrate metabolism and gene expression throughout para-, endo-, and eco-dormancy during the transition from summer, autumn, and winter, respectively. The data indicates that endo-dormancy plays a role in preventing new shoot growth during the transition from autumn to winter. Cold temperature was involved in breaking endo-dormancy, inducing flowering competence, and inhibiting shoot growth. An inverse relationship developed between starch and soluble sugar (mainly sucrose) content in buds during the shift from para- to endo-dormancy, which continued through eco-dormancy. Unlike starch content, soluble sugars were lowest in crown buds during para-dormancy but increased over two- to three-fold during the transition to endo-dormancy. Several genes (AGPase, HK, SPS, SuSy, and UGPase) coding for proteins involved in sugar metabolism were differentially regulated in conjunction with well-defined phases of dormancy in crown buds. Marker genes for S-phase progression, cell wall biochemistry, or responsive to auxin were also differentially regulated during transition from para-, endo-, and eco-dormancy. The results were used to develop a model showing potential signalling pathways involved in regulating seasonal dormancy status in leafy spurge crown buds.     

Bacteriophage adenine methyltransferase: a life cycle regulator? Modelled using Vibrio harveyi myovirus like

The adenine methyltransferase (DAM) gene methylates GATC sequences that have been demonstrated in various bacteria to be a powerful gene regulator functioning as an epigenetic switch, particularly with virulence gene regulation. However, overproduction of DAM can lead to mutations, giving rise to variability that may be important for adaptation to environmental change. While most bacterial hosts carry a DAM gene, not all bacteriophage carry this gene. Currently, there is no literature regarding the role DAM plays in life cycle regulation of bacteriophage. Vibrio campbellii strain 642 carries the bacteriophage Vibrio harveyi myovirus like (VHML) that has been proven to increase virulence. The complete genome sequence of VHML bacteriophage revealed a putative adenine methyltransferase gene. Using VHML, a new model of phage life cycle regulation, where DAM plays a central role between the lysogenic and lytic states, will be hypothesized. In short, DAM methylates the rha antirepressor gene and once methylation is removed, homologous CI repressor protein becomes repressed and non‐functional leading to the switching to the lytic cycle. Greater understanding of life cycle regulation at the genetic level can, in the future, lead to the genesis of chimeric bacteriophage with greater control over their life cycle for their safe use as probiotics within the aquaculture industry.     

Uptake and Effect of Abscisic Acid during Induction and Progress of Radicle Growth in Seeds of Chenopodium album

In the seeds of Chenopodium album L. visible phenomena preceding the final protrusion of the radicle enable a clear distinction between the induction and the progress of growth inside the covering structures. The light-dependent induction of radicle growth is not inhibited by exogenously applied abscisic acid (ABA). Experiments with 1-¹⁴C-ABA ruled out a lack of penetration of the hormone. However, ABA does inhibit the growth of the radicle before final protrusion. This inhibition and the uptake of 1-¹⁴C-ABA are enhanced at lower pH values, indicating absorption of the undissociated molecule. The uptake of labeled hormone strongly increases during the growth of the radicle. This increase is not merely a reflection of extra water uptake. Seeds of different degrees of dormancy contain equallly low levels of endogenous ABA. Much higher levels of ABA in the seeds were obtained by exogenous application of the hormone but these levels stills do not prevent the breaking the dormancy by light. It is concluded that ABA has no function in the regulation of dormancy in C. album seeds.     

Bud Dormancy in the Kiwi Fruit, Actinidia chinensis Planch

A study of lateral bud dormancy in Actinidia chinensis has shownthat true dormancy can be induced, especially in short daysat warm and constant temperatures This dormancy can be brokenquantitatively by chilling but temperatures as high as 10 °Care effective The dormancy appears to be due to an inhibitor(possibly ABA), apparently stored in the special bud cover aspecial structure in Kiwi fruit which may represent fused stipulesRemoval of the cover also admits oxygen and light, both of whichhave promoting effects on bud break Application of ABA enhancesdormancy (as do crude extracts tentatively identified as ABA)while GA₃ application enhances dormancy before chilling andpromotes bud break only after chilling Actinidia chinensis, Kiwi fruit, dormancy, abscissic acid, gibberellic acid, chilling