Effect of anoxic/aerobic phase fraction on N2O emission in a sequencing batch reactor under low temperature

Laboratory scale anoxic/aerobic sequencing batch reactor (A/O SBR) was operated around 15 °C to evaluate the effect of anoxic/aerobic phase fraction (PF) on N₂O emission. The ammonia removal exhibited a decrease trend with the increase of PF, while the highest total nitrogen removal was achieved at PF = 0.5. Almost all the N₂O was emitted during the aerobic phase, despite of the PF value. However, the net emission of N₂O was affected by PF. Under the premise of completely aerobic nitrification, the lowest N₂O emission was achieved at PF = 0.5, with a N₂O-N conversion rate of 9.8%. At lower PF (PF = 0.2), N₂O emission was stimulated by residual nitrite caused by uncompleted denitrification during the anoxic phase. On the other hand, the exhaustion of the easily degradable carbon was the major cause for the high N₂O emission at higher PF (PF = 0.5). The N₂O emission increased with the decreasing temperature. The time-weighted N₂O emission quantity at 15 °C was 2.9 times higher than that at 25 °C.     

Who contributes more to N2O emission during sludge bio-drying with two different aeration strategies,nitrifiers or denitrifiers?

Global warming effects have drawn more and more attention to studying all sources and sinks of nitrous oxide (N₂O). Sludge bio-drying, as an effective sludge treatment technology, is being adopted worldwide. In this study, two aeration strategies (piles I and II) were compared to investigate the primary contributors to N₂O emission during sludge bio-drying through studying the evolution of functional genes involved in nitrification (amoA, hao, and nxrA) and denitrification (narG, nirS, nirK, norB, and nosZ) by quantitative PCR (qPCR). Results showed that the profile of N₂O emission can be divided into three stages, traditional denitrification contributed largely to N₂O emission at stage I (days 1–5), but N₂O emission mainly happened at stage II (days 5–14) due to nitrifier denitrification and NH₂OH accumulation by ammonia-oxidizing bacteria (AOB), accounting for 51.4% and 58.2% of total N₂O emission for piles I and II, respectively. At stage III (days 14–21), nitrifier denitrification was inhibited because sludge bio-drying proceeded mainly by the physical aeration, thus N₂O emission decreased and changed little. The improved aeration strategy availed pile I to reduce N₂O emission much especially at stages II and III, respectively. These results indicated that nitrifier denitrification by AOB and biological NH₂OH oxidation due to AOB made more contribution to N₂O emission, and aeration strategy was crucial to mitigate N₂O emission during sludge bio-drying.

     

Characteristics of nitrous oxide (N2O) emission from intermittently aerated sequencing batch reactors (IASBRs) treating slaughterhouse wastewater at low temperature

This study investigated the characteristics of nitrous oxide (N₂O) emission from intermittently aerated sequencing batch reactors (IASBRs) treating high strength slaughterhouse wastewater at 11 °C, where partial nitrification followed by denitrification (PND) was achieved. N₂O generation and emission was examined at three aeration rates of 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8 L air/min in three IASBRs (SBR1, SBR2, and SBR3, respectively). The slaughterhouse wastewater contained chemical oxygen demand (COD) of 6057 ± 172.6 mg/L, total nitrogen (TN) of 576 ± 15.1 mg/L, total phosphorus (TP) of 52 ± 2.7 mg/L and suspended solids (SS) of 1843 ± 280.5 g/L. In the pseudo-steady state, the amount of N₂O emission was up to 5.7–11.0% of incoming TN. The aeration rate negatively affected N₂O emission and the ratio of N₂O emission to incoming TN was reduced by 48.2% when the aeration rate was increased from 0.4 to 0.8 L air/min. Results showed that more N₂O was generated in non-aeration periods than in aeration periods. Lower DO concentrations enhanced N₂O generation in the aeration periods (probably via nitrifier denitrification) while low DO concentrations (lower than 0.2 mg/L) did not affect N₂O generation in the non-aeration periods (probably via heterotrophic denitrification). When PHB was utilized as the organic substrate for denitrification, there was a high N₂O generation potential. It was estimated that 1.8 mg N₂O-N was generated accompanying per mg PHB consumed.     

Effects of loading rate and aeration on nitrogen removal and N<Subscript>2</Subscript>O emissions in intermittently aerated sequencing batch reactors treating slaughterhouse wastewater at 11 °C

This study aimed to find optimal operation conditions for nitrogen removal from high strength slaughterhouse wastewater at 11 °C using the intermittently aerated sequencing batch reactors (IASBRs) so as to provide an engineering control strategy for the IASBR technology. Two operational parameters were examined: (1) loading rates and (2) aeration rates. Both the two parameters affected variation of DO concentrations in the IASBR operation cycles. It was found that to achieve efficient nitrogen removal via partial nitrification–denitrification (PND), “DO elbow” point must appear at the end of the last aeration period. There was a correlation between the ammonium oxidizing bacteria (AOB)/nitrite oxidizing bacteria (NOB) ratio and the average DO concentrations in the last aeration periods; when the average DO concentrations in the last aeration periods were lower than 4.86 mg/L, AOB became the dominant nitrifier population, which benefited nitrogen removal via PND. Both the nitrogen loading rate and the aeration rate influenced the population sizes of AOB and NOB. To accomplish efficient nitrogen removal via PND, the optimum aeration rate (A, L air/min) applied can be predicted according to the average organic loading rates based on mathematical equations developed in this study. The research shows that the amount of N₂O generation in the aeration period was reduced with increasing the aeration rate; however, the highest N₂O generation in the non-aeration period was observed at the optimum aeration rates.     

Influence of O2 availability on NO and N2O release by nitrification and denitrification in soils

The availability of O₂ is believed to be one of the main factors regulating nitrification and denitrification and the release of NO and N₂O. The availability of O₂ in soil is controlled by the O₂ partial pressure in the gas phase and by the moisture content in the soil. Therefore, we investigated the influence of O₂ partial pressures and soil moisture contents on the NO and N₂O release in a sandy and a loamy silt and differentiated between nitrification and denitrification by selective inhibition of nitrification with 10 Pa acetylene. At 60% whc (maximum water holding capacity) NO and N₂O release by denitrification increased with decreasing O₂ partial pressure and reached a maximum under anoxic conditions. Under anoxic conditions NO and N₂O were only released by denitrification. NO and N₂O release by nitrification also increased with decreasing O₂ partial pressure, but reached a maximum at 0.1–0.5% O₂ and then decreased again. Nitrification was the main source of NO and N₂O at O₂ partial pressures higher than 0.1–0.5% O₂. At lower O₂ partial pressures denitrification was the main source of NO and N₂O. With decreasing O₂ partial pressure N₂O release increased more than NO release, indicating that the N₂O release was more sensitive against O₂ than the NO release. At ambient O₂ partial pressure (20.5% O₂) NO and N₂O release by denitrification increased with increasing soil moisture content. The maximum NO and N₂O release was observed at soil moisture contents of 65–80% whc and 100% whc, respectively. NO and N₂O release by nitrification also increased with increasing soil moisture content with a maximum at 45–55% whc and 90% whc, respectively. Nitrification was the main source of NO and N₂O at soil moisture contents lower than 90% whc and 80% whc, respectively. Higher soil moisture contents favoured NO and N₂O release by denitrification. Soil texture had also an effect on the release of NO and N₂O. The coarse-textured sandy silt released more NO than N₂O compared with the fine-textured loamy silt. At high soil moisture contents (80–100% whc) the fine-textured soil showed a higher N₂O release by denitrification than the coarse-textured soil. We assume that the fine-textured soil became anoxic at a lower soil moisture content than the coarse-textured soil. In conclusion, the effects of O₂ partial pressure, soil moisture and soil texture were consistent with the theory that denitrification increasingly contributes to the release of NO and in particular N₂O when conditions for soil microorganisms become increasingly anoxic.     

Mechanism leading to N<Subscript>2</Subscript>O production in wastewater treating biofilm systems

Wastewater treatment plants are known to be important point sources for nitrous oxide (N₂O) in the anthropogenic N cycle. Biofilm based treatment systems have gained increasing popularity in the treatment of wastewater, but the mechanisms and controls of N₂O formation are not fully understood. Here, we review functional groups of microorganism involved in nitrogen (N) transformations during wastewater treatment, with emphasis on potential mechanism of N₂O production in biofilms. Biofilms used in wastewater treatment typically harbour aerobic and anaerobic zones, mediating close interactions between different groups of N transforming organisms. Current models of mass transfer and biomass interactions in biofilms are discussed to illustrate the complex regulation of N₂O production. Ammonia oxidizing bacteria (AOB) are the prime source for N₂O in aerobic zones, while heterotrophic denitrifiers dominate N₂O production in anoxic zones. Nitrosative stress ensuing from accumulation of NO₂ ^? during partial nitrification or denitrification seems to be one of the most critical factors for enhanced N₂O formation. In AOB, N₂O production is coupled to nitrifier denitrification triggered by nitrosative stress, low O₂ tension or low pH. Chemical N₂O production from AOB intermediates (NH₂OH, HNO, NO) released during high NH₃ turnover seems to be limited to surface-near AOB clusters, since diffusive mass transport resistance for O₂ slows down NH₃ oxidation rates in deeper biofilm layers. The proportion of N₂O among gaseous intermediates (NO, N₂O, N₂) in heterotrophic denitrification increases when NO or nitrous acid (HNO₂) accumulates because of increasing NO₂ ^?, or when transient oxygen intrusion impairs complete denitrification. Limited electron donor availability due to mass transport limitation of organic substrates into anoxic biofilm zones is another important factor supporting high N₂O/N₂ ratios in heterotrophic denitrifiers. Biofilms accommodating Anammox bacteria release less N₂O, because Anammox bacteria have no known N₂O producing metabolism and reduce NO₂ ^? to N₂, thereby lowering nitrosative stress to AOB and heterotrophs.     

Enhanced biological nitrogen removal and N<Subscript>2</Subscript>O emission characteristics of the intermittent aeration activated sludge process

Enhanced biological nitrogen removal processes are necessarily required to cope with more stringent wastewater discharging regulations, especially for wastewater with low level of organic carbon to nitrogen ratios. The intermittent aeration activated sludge process has been received comprehensive attention over the past decades, due to its excellent performance in nitrogen removal and remarkable reduction of energy consumption. Recent advances for this technology was reviewed from aspects of characteristics of system, factors affecting nitrogen removal, nitrous oxide (N₂O) emission and its control, and application of the technology and its operation control. Finally, future development was proposed. In the intermittent aeration activated sludge process, aeration duration should be controlled for adequate nitrification and non-aeration duration should be adequate for complete denitrification, and these would benefit both nitrogen removal and N₂O mitigation. The step feed strategy could be applied to enhance the better utilization of influent organic carbon for nitrogen removal. Dissolved oxygen (DO) and aerobic duration both affected nitrogen removal in particular that via nitrite in the intermittent aeration process. Nitrite should be removed efficiently to avoid a high N₂O emission under both anoxic and aerobic conditions. Intermittent aeration activated sludge process has been applied in the treatment of various wastewaters, such as municipal wastewater, swine wastewater, anaerobic effluents and landfill leachate. For practical application, DO, pH and oxidation–reduction potential could be used as indices for controlling nitrogen removal and N₂O mitigation. Microbial ecology in the intermittent aeration activated sludge process should be specifically focused in future studies.     

High-Resolution Denitrification Kinetics in Pasture Soils Link N2O Emissions to pH,and Denitrification to C Mineralization

Denitrification in pasture soils is mediated by microbial and physicochemical processes leading to nitrogen loss through the emission of N₂O and N₂. It is known that N₂O reduction to N₂ is impaired by low soil pH yet controversy remains as inconsistent use of soil pH measurement methods by researchers, and differences in analytical methods between studies, undermine direct comparison of results. In addition, the link between denitrification and N₂O emissions in response to carbon (C) mineralization and pH in different pasture soils is still not well described. We hypothesized that potential denitrification rate and aerobic respiration rate would be positively associated with soils. This relationship was predicted to be more robust when a high resolution analysis is performed as opposed to a single time point comparison. We tested this by characterizing 13 different temperate pasture soils from northern and southern hemispheres sites (Ireland and New Zealand) using a fully automated-high-resolution GC detection system that allowed us to detect a wide range of gas emissions simultaneously. We also compared the impact of using different extractants for determining pH on our conclusions. In all pH measurements, soil pH was strongly and negatively associated with both N₂O production index (IN₂O) and N₂O/(N₂O+N₂) product ratio. Furthermore, emission kinetics across all soils revealed that the denitrification rates under anoxic conditions (NO+N₂O+N₂ μmol N/h/vial) were significantly associated with C mineralization (CO₂ μmol/h/vial) measured both under oxic (r² = 0.62, p = 0.0015) and anoxic (r² = 0.89, p<0.0001) conditions.     

Effect of oxic and anoxic conditions on nitrous oxide emissions from nitrification and denitrification processes

A lab-scale sequencing batch reactor fed with real municipal wastewater was used to study nitrous oxide (N(2)O) emissions from simulated wastewater treatment processes. The experiments were performed under four different controlled conditions as follows: (1) fully aerobic, (2) anoxic-aerobic with high dissolved oxygen (DO) concentration, (3) anoxic-aerobic with low DO concentration, and 4) intermittent aeration. The results indicated that N(2)O production can occur from both incomplete nitrification and incomplete denitrification. N(2)O production from denitrification was observed in both aerobic and anoxic phases. However, N(2)O production from aerobic conditions occurred only when both low DO concentrations and high nitrite concentration existed simultaneously. The magnitude of N(2) O produced via anoxic denitrification was lower than via oxic denitrification and required the presence of nitrite. Changes in DO, ammonium, and nitrite concentrations influenced the magnitude of N(2)O production through denitrification. The results also suggested that N(2)O can be produced from incomplete denitrification and then released to the atmosphere during aeration phase due to air stripping. Therefore, biological nitrogen removal systems should be optimized to promote complete nitrification and denitrification to minimize N(2)O emissions.     

Deciphering the oxygen isotope composition of nitrous oxide produced by nitrification

The ability to use δ¹⁸O values of nitrous oxide (N₂O) to apportion environmental emissions is currently hindered by a poor understanding of the controls on δ¹⁸O–N₂O from nitrification (hydroxylamine oxidation to N₂O and nitrite reduction to N₂O). In this study fertilized agricultural soils and unfertilized temperate forest soils were aerobically incubated with different ¹⁸O/¹⁶O waters, and conceptual and mathematical models were developed to systematically explain the δ¹⁸O–N₂O formed by nitrification. Modeling exercises used a set of defined input parameters to emulate the measured soil δ¹⁸O–N₂O data (Monte Carlo approach). The Monte Carlo simulations implied that abiotic oxygen (O) exchange between nitrite (NO₂^?) and H₂O is important in all soils, but that biological, enzyme‐controlled O‐exchange does not occur during the reduction of NO₂^? to N₂O (nitrifier‐denitrification). Similarly, the results of the model simulations indicated that N₂O consumption is not characteristic of aerobic N₂O formation. The results of this study and a synthesis of the published literature data indicate that δ¹⁸O–N₂O formed in aerobic environments is constrained between +13‰ and +35‰ relative to Vienna Standard Mean Ocean Water (VSMOW). N₂O formed via hydroxylamine oxidation and nitrifier‐denitrification cannot be separated using δ¹⁸O unless ¹⁸O tracers are employed. The natural range of nitrifier δ¹⁸O–N₂O is discussed and explained in terms of our conceptual model, and the major and minor controls that define aerobically produced δ¹⁸O–N₂O are identified. Despite the highly complex nature of δ¹⁸O–N₂O produced by nitrification this δ¹⁸O range is narrow. As a result, in many situations δ¹⁸O values may be used in conjunction with δ¹⁵N–N₂O data to apportion nitrifier‐ and denitrifier‐derived N₂O. However, when biological O‐exchange during denitrification is high and N₂O consumption is low, there may be too much overlap in δ¹⁸O values to distinguish N₂O formed by these pathways.     

New pathways for ammonia conversion in soil and aquatic systems

Ammonia conversion processes are essential for most soil and aquatic systems. Under natural conditions, the many possible reactions are difficult to analyze. For example, nitrification and denitrification have long been regarded as separate phenomena performed by different groups of bacteria in segregated areas of soils, sediments or aquatic systems sequentially in time. It has now been established that strict segregation in place and time of the two processes is not necessary and that both denitrifiers and nitrifiers have versatile metabolisms. However, the rates described for aerobic denitrifiers are very low compared to the rates observed under anoxic conditions. Also the rates of nitrifier denitrification are quite low, indicating that these conversions may not play an important role under natural conditions. In addition, these processes often result in the emission of quite large amounts of undesirable products, NO and N₂O. Heterotrophic nitrification might be of relevance for systems, that contain a high carbon to nitrogen ratio. Recently, a novel process (Anammox) has been discovered in which ammonium serves as the electron donor for denitrification of nitrite into dinitrogen gas. ¹⁵N labeling studies showed that hydrazine and hydroxylamine were important intermediates in this process. Enrichment cultures on ammonium, nitrite and bicarbonate resulted in the dominance of one morphotypical microorganism. The growth rate of the cultures is extremely low (doubling time 11 days), but the affinity for ammonium and nitrite and the conversion rates (9.2 10^–4 mol kg^–1 s^–1) are quite high. Some of the reported high nitrogen losses in soil and aquatic systems might be attributed to anaerobic ammonium oxidation. In addition, this conversion offers new opportunities for nitrogen removal, when it is combined with recently developed processes for partial nitrification.     

Relative Rates of Nitric Oxide and Nitrous Oxide Production by Nitrifiers, Denitrifiers, and Nitrate Respirers

Biogenic emissions of nitric and nitrous oxides have important impacts on the photochemistry and chemistry of the atmosphere. Although biogenic production appears to be the overwhelming source of N₂O, the magnitude of the biogenic emission of NO is very uncertain. In soils, possible sources of NO and N₂O include nitrification by autotrophic and heterotrophic nitrifiers, denitrification by nitrifiers and denitrifiers, nitrate respiration by fermenters, and chemodenitrification. The availability of oxygen determines to a large extent the relative activities of these various groups of organisms. To better understand this influence, we investigated the effect of the partial pressure of oxygen (pO₂) on the production of NO and N₂O by a wide variety of common soil nitrifying, denitrifying, and nitrate-respiring bacteria under laboratory conditions. The production of NO per cell was highest by autotrophic nitrifiers and was independent of pO₂ in the range tested (0.5 to 10%), whereas N₂O production was inversely proportional to pO₂. Nitrous oxide production was highest in the denitrifier Pseudomonas fluorescens, but only under anaerobic conditions. The molar ratio of NO/N₂O produced was usually greater than unity for nitrifiers and much less than unity for denitrifiers. Chemodenitrification was the major source of both the NO and N₂O produced by the nitrate respirer Serratia marcescens. Chemodenitrification was also a possible source of NO and N₂O in nitrifier cultures but only when high concentrations of nitrite had accumulated or were added to the medium. Although most of the denitrifiers produced NO and N₂O only under anaerobic conditions, chemostat cultures of Alcaligenes faecalis continued to emit these gases even when the cultures were sparged with air. Based upon these results, we predict that aerobic soils are primary sources of NO and that N₂O is produced only when there is sufficient soil moisture to provide the anaerobic microsites necessary for denitrification by either denitrifiers or nitrifiers.     

Effect of anaerobic reaction time on denitrifying phosphorus removal and N2O production

Nitrous oxide (N₂O) is a highly potent greenhouse gas; however, the characteristics of N₂O production during denitrification using poly-β-hydroxyalkanoates (PHA) as a carbon source are not well understood. In this study, effects of anaerobic reaction time (AnRT) on PHA formation, denitrifying phosphorus removal and N₂O production were investigated using a laboratory-scale anaerobic/anoxic/oxic sequencing batch reactor (An/A/O SBR). The results showed that operation of the An/A/O SBR for 0.78 SRT (47 cycles) after the AnRT was shortened from 90 min to 60 min resulted in anaerobically synthesized PHA improving by 1.8 times. This improvement was accompanied by increased phosphorus removal efficiency and denitrification. Accordingly, the N₂O-N production was reduced by 6.7 times. Parallel batch experiments were also conducted with AnRTs of 60, 90 and 120 min. All results indicated that in addition to the amount of anaerobically synthesized PHA, the kinetics of PHA degradation also regulated denitrifying phosphorus removal and N₂O production.     

Denitrification and N<Subscript>2</Subscript>O emission from forested and cultivated alluvial clay soil

Restored forested wetlands reduce N loads in surface discharge through plant uptake and denitrification. While removal of reactive N reduces impact on receiving waters, it is unclear whether enhanced denitrification also enhances emissions of the greenhouse gas N₂O, thus compromising the water-quality benefits of restoration. This study compares denitrification rates and N₂O:N₂ emission ratios from Sharkey clay soil in a mature bottomland forest to those from an adjacent cultivated site in the Lower Mississippi Alluvial Valley. Potential denitrification of forested soil was 2.4 times of cultivated soil. Using intact soil cores, denitrification rates of forested soil were 5.2, 6.6 and 2.0 times those of cultivated soil at 70, 85 and 100% water-filled pore space (WFPS), respectively. When NO₃ was added, N₂O emissions from forested soil were 2.2 times those of cultivated soil at 70% WFPS. At 85 and 100% WFPS, N₂O emissions were not significantly different despite much greater denitrification rates in the forested soil because N₂O:N₂ emission ratios declined more rapidly in forested soil as WFPS increased. These findings suggest that restoration of forested wetlands to reduce NO₃ in surface discharge will not contribute significantly to the atmospheric burden of N₂O.     

Production of NO, N2O and N2 by extracted soil bacteria, regulation by NO2(-) and O2 concentrations.

The oxygen control of denitrification and its emission of NO/N2O/N2 was investigated by incubation of Nycodenz-extracted soil bacteria in an incubation robot which monitors O2, NO, N2O and N2 concentrations (in He+O2 atmosphere). Two consecutive incubations were undertaken to determine (1) the regulation of denitrification by O2 and NO2(-) during respiratory O2 depletion and (2) the effects of re-exposure to O2 of cultures with fully expressed denitrification proteome. Early denitrification was only detected (as NO and N2O) at 相似文献   

Denitrification and N2O emission from urine-affected grassland soil

Denitrification and N₂O emission rates were measured following two applications of artificial urine (40 g urine-N m^–2) to a perennial rye-grass sward on sandy soil. To distinguish between N₂O emission from denitrification or nitrification, urine was also applied with a nitrification inhibitor (dicyandiamide, DCD). During a 14 day period following each application, the soil was frequently sampled, and incubated with and without acetylene to measure denitrification and N₂O emission rates, respectively.Urine application significantly increased denitrification and N₂O emission rates up to 14 days after application, with rates amounting to 0.9 and 0.6 g N m^–2 day^–1 (9 and 6 kg N ha^–1 day^–1), respectively. When DCD was added to the urine, N₂O emission rates were significantly lower from 3 to 7 days after urine application onwards. Denitrification was the main source of N₂O immediately following each urine application. 14 days after the first application, when soil water contents dropped to 15% (v/v) N₂O mainly derived from nitrification.Total denitrification losses during the 14 day periods were 7 g N m^–2, or 18% of the urine-N applied. Total N₂O emission losses were 6.5 and 3 g N m^–2, or 16% and 8% of the urine-N applied for the two periods. The minimum estimations of denitrification and N₂O emission losses from urine-affected soil were 45 to 55 kg N ha^–1 year^–1, and 20 to 50 kg N ha^–1 year^–1, respectively.     

Reduction of the Powerful Greenhouse Gas N2O in the South-Eastern Indian Ocean

Nitrous oxide (N₂O) is a powerful greenhouse gas and a key catalyst of stratospheric ozone depletion. Yet, little data exist about the sink and source terms of the production and reduction of N₂O outside the well-known oxygen minimum zones (OMZ). Here we show the presence of functional marker genes for the reduction of N₂O in the last step of the denitrification process (nitrous oxide reductase genes; nosZ) in oxygenated surface waters (180–250 O₂ μmol.kg^-1) in the south-eastern Indian Ocean. Overall copy numbers indicated that nosZ genes represented a significant proportion of the microbial community, which is unexpected in these oxygenated waters. Our data show strong temperature sensitivity for nosZ genes and reaction rates along a vast latitudinal gradient (32°S-12°S). These data suggest a large N₂O sink in the warmer Tropical waters of the south-eastern Indian Ocean. Clone sequencing from PCR products revealed that most denitrification genes belonged to Rhodobacteraceae. Our work highlights the need to investigate the feedback and tight linkages between nitrification and denitrification (both sources of N₂O, but the latter also a source of bioavailable N losses) in the understudied yet strategic Indian Ocean and other oligotrophic systems.     

Factors Affecting Nitrous Oxide Production: A Comparison of Biological Nitrogen Removal Processes with Partial and Complete Nitrification

Nitrous oxide (N₂O) emission from biological nitrogen removal (BNR) processes has recently received more research attention. In this study, two lab-scale BNR systems were used to investigate the effects of various operating parameters including the carbon to nitrogen (C/N) ratio, ammonia loading, and the hydraulic retention time on N₂O production. The first system was operated in a conventional BNR mode known as the Ludzack–Ettinger (LE) process, consisting of complete denitrification and nitrification reactors, while the second one was operated in a shortcut BNR (SBNR) mode employing partial nitrification and shortcut denitrification, which requires less oxygen and carbon sources. As the C/N ratio was decreased, a significant increase in N₂O production was observed only in the anoxic reactor of the LE process, indicating that N₂O was released as an intermediate of the denitrification reaction under the carbon-limited condition. However, the SBNR process did not produce significant N₂O even at the lowest C/N ratio of 0.5. When the SBNR process was subjected to increasing concentrations of ammonia, N₂O production from the aerobic reactor was rapidly increased. Furthermore, the increasing production of N₂O was observed mostly in the aerobic reactor of the SBNR process with a decline in hydraulic retention time. These experimental findings indicated that the increase in N₂O production was closely related to the accumulation of free ammonia, which was caused by an abrupt increase of the ammonium loading. Consequently, the partial nitrification was more susceptible to shock loading conditions, resulting in a high production of N₂O, although the SBNR process was more efficient with respect to nitrogen removals as well as carbon and oxygen requirements.     

Nitrosospira spp. can produce nitrous oxide via a nitrifier denitrification pathway

Nitrous oxide (N(2)O) emission from soils is a major contributor to the atmospheric loading of this potent greenhouse gas. It is thought that autotrophic ammonia oxidizing bacteria (AOB) are a significant source of soil-derived N(2)O and a denitrification pathway (i.e. reduction of NO(2) (-) to NO and N(2)O), so-called nitrifier denitrification, has been demonstrated as a N(2)O production mechanism in Nitrosomonas europaea. It is thought that Nitrosospira spp. are the dominant AOB in soil, but little information is available on their ability to produce N(2)O or on the existence of a nitrifier denitrification pathway in this lineage. This study aims to characterize N(2)O production and nitrifier denitrification in seven strains of AOB representative of clusters 0, 2 and 3 in the cultured Nitrosospira lineage. Nitrosomonas europaea ATCC 19718 and ATCC 25978 were analysed for comparison. The aerobically incubated test strains produced significant (P < 0.001) amounts of N(2)O and total N(2)O production rates ranged from 2.0 amol cell(-1) h(-1), in Nitrosospira tenuis strain NV12, to 58.0 amol cell(-1) h(-1), in N. europaea ATCC 19718. Nitrosomonas europaea ATCC 19718 was atypical in that it produced four times more N(2)O than the next highest producing strain. All AOB tested were able to carry out nitrifier denitrification under aerobic conditions, as determined by production of (15)N-N(2)O from applied (15)N-NO(2) (-). Up to 13.5% of the N(2)O produced was derived from the exogenously applied (15)N-NO(2) (-). The results suggest that nitrifier denitrification could be a universal trait in the betaproteobacterial AOB and its potential ecological significance is discussed.     

Microbial N2O consumption in and above marine N2O production hotspots

The ocean is a net source of N₂O, a potent greenhouse gas and ozone-depleting agent. However, the removal of N₂O via microbial N₂O consumption is poorly constrained and rate measurements have been restricted to anoxic waters. Here we expand N₂O consumption measurements from anoxic zones to the sharp oxygen gradient above them, and experimentally determine kinetic parameters in both oxic and anoxic seawater for the first time. We find that the substrate affinity, O₂ tolerance, and community composition of N₂O-consuming microbes in oxic waters differ from those in the underlying anoxic layers. Kinetic parameters determined here are used to model in situ N₂O production and consumption rates. Estimated in situ rates differ from measured rates, confirming the necessity to consider kinetics when predicting N₂O cycling. Microbes from the oxic layer consume N₂O under anoxic conditions at a much faster rate than microbes from anoxic zones. These experimental results are in keeping with model results which indicate that N₂O consumption likely takes place above the oxygen deficient zone (ODZ). Thus, the dynamic layer with steep O₂ and N₂O gradients right above the ODZ is a previously ignored potential gatekeeper of N₂O and should be accounted for in the marine N₂O budget.Subject terms: Water microbiology, Biogeochemistry, Microbial ecology