Videographic Assessment of the Quality of EMS to ED Handoff Communication During Pediatric Resuscitations

Background: The National Association of Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Physicians emphasizes the importance of high quality communication between EMS providers and emergency department (ED) staff for providing safe, effective care. The Joint Commission has identified ineffective handoff communication as a contributing factor in 80% of serious medical errors. The quality of handoff communication from EMS to ED teams for critically ill pediatric patients needs further exploration.

Objective: This study assessed the quality of handoff communication between EMS and ED staff during pediatric medical resuscitations.

Methods/Design: We conducted a retrospective review of video recordings of pediatric patients who required critical care (“resuscitation”) in the ED between January 2014 and February 2016 at a Level 1 pediatric trauma center. Handoff quality between EMS and emergency department teams was assessed for completeness, timeliness, and efficiency. Institutional review board approval was obtained.

Results: Sixty-eight resuscitations were reviewed; 28% presented in cardiac arrest, requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Completeness of information communicated was variable and included chief complaint (88%), prehospital interventions (81%), physical exam findings (63%), medical history (59%), age (56%), and weight (20%). Completeness of specific vital sign reporting included: respiratory rate (53%), heart rate (43%), oxygen saturation (39%), and blood pressure (31%). Timeliness of communication included median patient handoff and report times of 50?seconds [IQR 30,74] and 108?seconds [IQR 62,252], respectively. Inefficient communication occurred in 87% of handoffs, including interruptions by ED staff (51%), questions from the ED physician team leader asking for information already communicated (40%), and questions by ED physician team leader requesting information not yet communicated (65%). When comparing non-CPR to CPR cases, only timeliness of patient handoff was significantly different for those patients receiving prehospital CPR.

Conclusion: Handoff communication between EMS and ED teams during pediatric resuscitation was frequently incomplete and inefficient. Future educational and quality improvement interventions could aim to improve the quality of handoff communication for this patient population.     

Relationship of Restraint Use,Patient Injury,andAssaults on Ems Personnel

Objective. We hypothesized that the assaults on EMS personnel by patients requiring restraints can be correlated with demographic information, patient condition, andother scene information such as presence the of law enforcement. Methods. The study was a one-year cross-sectional study of paramedic restraint use andassault on EMS personnel in an urban area. A data collection form was completed by EMS for each patient placed in restraints. Study outcome variable was “Assault on EMS personnel.” Predictor variables included demographic andEMS call information, patient condition, law-enforcement related variables, andthe paramedic's perception of the need for chemical restraints. To compare predictor andoutcome variables, a multivariable model with odds ratios and95% confidence intervals was used. Results. The study included 271 restrained patients over a 12-month period from April 2002 to April 2003. Seventy-seven (28%) cases were positive for assaults on EMS personnel. Multivariable analysis including 8 variables, indicated the following 6 variables were associated with assault on EMS personnel: time of day between midnight and6 am (OR = 4.4, 95% CI = 1.6–12.7); female patient (OR for males 0.6, 95% CI = 0.3–1.0); violent patient (OR = 10.1, 95%CI = 2.3–48.2); patient injured under supervision (OR = 3.9, 95% CI = 1.1–13.8); arrested patient (OR = 4.4, 95% CI = 1.1–18.5); andperceived need for chemical restraint (OR = 2.1, 95% CI = 1.2–3.9). Conclusion. Multiple factors are correlated with assaults on EMS personnel by patients requiring restraints. By specifically targeting patients exhibiting these factors, EMS providers can help prevent injury to themselves. Patients not exhibiting these factors may be less dangerous.     

Association between EMS Question Bank Completion and Passing Rates on the EMS Certification Examination

Introduction: A board review question bank was created to assist candidates in their preparation for the 2015 EMS certification examination. We aimed to describe the development of this question bank and evaluate its successes in preparing candidates to obtain EMS subspecialty board certification. Methods: An online question bank was developed by 13 subject matter experts who participated as item writers, representing eight different EMS fellowship programs. The online question bank consisted of four practice tests, with each of the tests comprised of 100 questions. The number of candidates who participated in and completed the question bank was calculated. The passing rate among candidates who completed the question bank was calculated and compared to the publicly reported statistics for all candidates. The relationship between candidates' performance on the question bank and subspecialty exam pass rates was determined. Results: A total of 252 candidates took at least one practice test and, of those, 225 candidates completed all four 100-question practice tests. The pass rate on the 2015 EMS certification exam was 79% (95%CI 74–85%) among candidates who completed the question bank, which is 12% higher than the overall pass rate (p = 0.003). Candidates' performance on the question bank was positively associated with overall success on the exam (X² = 75.8, p < 0.0001). Achieving a score of ≥ 70% on the question bank was associated with a higher likelihood of passing the exam (OR = 17.8; 95% CI: 8.0–39.6). Conclusion: Completing the question bank program was associated with improved pass rates on the EMS certification exam. Strong performance on the question bank correlated with success on the exam.     

EMS blood collection from patients with acute chest pain reduces emergency department length of stay

BackgroundExpediting the measurement of serum troponin by leveraging EMS blood collection could reduce the diagnostic time for patients with acute chest pain and help address Emergency Department (ED) overcrowding. However, this practice has not been examined among an ED chest pain patient population in the United States.MethodsA prospective observational cohort study of adults with non-traumatic chest pain without ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction was conducted in three EMS agencies between 12/2016–4/2018. During transport, paramedics obtained a patient blood sample that was sent directly to the hospital core lab for troponin measurement. On ED arrival HEART Pathway assessments were completed by ED providers as part of standard care. ED providers were blinded to troponin results from EMS blood samples. To evaluate the potential impact on length of stay (LOS), the time difference between EMS blood draw and first clinical ED draw was calculated. To determine the safety of using troponin measures from EMS blood samples, the diagnostic performance of the HEART Pathway for 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE: composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), coronary revascularization) was determined using EMS troponin plus arrival ED troponin and EMS troponin plus a serial 3-h ED troponin.ResultsThe use of EMS blood samples for troponin measures among 401 patients presenting with acute chest pain resulted in a mean potential reduction in LOS of 72.5 ± SD 35.7 min. MACE at 30 days occurred in 21.0% (84/401), with 1 cardiac death, 78 MIs, and 5 revascularizations without MI. Use of the HEART Pathway with EMS and ED arrival troponin measures yielded a NPV of 98.0% (95% CI: 89.6–100). NPV improved to 100% (95% CI: 92.9–100) when using the EMS and 3-h ED troponin measures.ConclusionsEMS blood collection used for core lab ED troponin measures could significantly reduce ED LOS and appears safe when integrated into the HEART Pathway.     

Ability of the Physiologic Criteria of the Field Triage Guidelines to Identify Children Who Need the Resources of a Trauma Center

Background: There is limited research on how well the American College of Surgeons/Center for Disease Control and Prevention Guidelines for Field Triage of Injured Patients assist EMS providers in identifying children who need the resources of a trauma center. Objective: To determine the accuracy of the Physiologic Criteria (Step 1) of the Field Triage Guidelines in identifying injured children who need the resources of a trauma center. Methods: EMS providers who transported injured children 15 years and younger to pediatric trauma centers in 3 mid-sized cities were interviewed regarding patient demographics and the presence or absence of each of the Field Triage Guidelines criteria. Children were considered to have needed a trauma center if they had non-orthopedic surgery within 24 hours, ICU admission, or died. This data was obtained through a structured hospital record review. The over- and under-triage rates and positive likelihood ratios (+LR) were calculated for the overall Physiologic Criteria and each individual criterion. Results: Interviews were conducted for 5,610 pediatric patients; outcome data were available for 5,594 (99.7%): 5% of all patients needed the resources of a trauma center and 19% met the physiologic criteria. Using the physiologic criteria alone, 51% of children who needed a trauma center would have been under-triaged and 18% would have been over-triaged (+LR 2.8, 95% CI 2.4–3.2). Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) < 14 had a +LR of 14.3 (95% CI 11.2–18.3), with EMS not obtaining a GCS in 4% of cases. 54% of those with an EMS GCS < 14 had an initial ED GCS < 14. Abnormal respiratory rate (RR) had a +LR of 2.2 (95% CI 1.8–2.6), with EMS not obtaining a RR in 5% of cases. 41% of those with an abnormal EMS RR had an abnormal initial ED RR. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 90 had a +LR of 3.5 (95% CI 2.5–5.1), with EMS not obtaining a SBP in 20% of cases. SBP was not obtained for 79% of children <1 year, 46% 1–4 years, 7% 5–9 years, and 2% 10–15 years. A total of 19% of those with an EMS SBP < 90 had an initial ED SBP < 90. Conclusions: The Physiologic Criteria are a moderate predictor of trauma center need for children. Missing or inaccurate vital signs may be limiting the predictive value of the Physiologic Criteria.     

Compulsory Use of the Backboard is Associated with Increased Frequency of Thoracolumbar Imaging

Background: Backboards have been shown to cause pain in uninjured patients. This may alter physical exam findings, leading emergency department (ED) providers to suspect a spinal injury when none exists resulting in additional imaging of the thoracolumbar spine. New York had previously employed a “Spinal Immobilization” protocol that included compulsory backboard application for all patients with suspected spinal injuries. In 2015, New York instituted a new “Spinal Motion Restriction” protocol that made backboard use optional for these patients. The objective of this study was to determine if this protocol change was associated with decreased backboard utilization and ED thoracolumbar spine imaging. Methods: This was a retrospective before-and-after chart review of subjects transported by a single emergency medical services (EMS) agency to one of four EDs for emergency calls dispatched as motor vehicle collisions (MVC). EMS and ED data were included for all calls within a 6-month interval before and after the protocol change. The protocol change was implemented in the second half of 2015. Subject demographics, backboard use, and spine imaging were reviewed for the intervals January–June 2015 and January–June 2016. Results: There were 818 subjects in the before period and 796 subjects in the after period. Subjects were similar in terms of gender, age and type of MVC in both periods. A backboard was utilized for 440 (54%) subjects in the before period and 92 (12%) subjects in the after period (p < 0.001). ED thoracic spine imaging was performed on 285 (35%) subjects in the before period, and 235 (30%) subjects in the after period (p = 0.02). ED lumbar spine imaging was performed for 335 (41%) subjects in the before period, and 281 (35%) subjects in the after period (p = 0.02). Conclusion: A shift from a spinal immobilization protocol to a spinal motion restriction protocol was associated with a decrease in backboard utilization by EMS providers and a decrease in thoracolumbar spine imaging by ED providers.     

Prehospital sepsis alert notification decreases time to initiation of CMS sepsis core measures

Objective

To determine if prehospital identification of sepsis will affect time to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid services (CMS) sepsis core measures and improve clinical outcomes.

Do EMS Providers Accurately Ascertain Anticoagulant and Antiplatelet Use in Older Adults with Head Trauma?

Objective: Prehospital provider assessment of the use of anticoagulant or antiplatelet medications in older adults with head trauma is important. These patients are at increased risk for traumatic intracranial hemorrhage and therefore field triage guidelines recommend transporting these patients to centers capable of rapid evaluation and treatment. Our objective was to evaluate EMS ascertainment of anticoagulant and antiplatelet medication use in older adults with head trauma. Methods: A retrospective study of older adults with head trauma was conducted throughout Sacramento County. All 5 transporting EMS agencies and all 11 hospitals in the county were included in the study, which ran from January 2012 to December 2012. Patients ≥55 years who were transported to a hospital by EMS after head trauma were included. We excluded patients transferred between two facilities, patients with penetrating head trauma, prisoners, and patients with unmatched hospital data. Anticoagulant and antiplatelet use were categorized as: warfarin, direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC; dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban), aspirin, and other antiplatelet agents (e.g., clopidogrel and ticagrelor). We calculated the percent agreement and kappa statistic for binary variables between EMS and emergency department (ED)/hospital providers. A kappa statistic ≥0.60 was considered acceptable agreement. Results: After excluding 174 (7.6%) patients, 2,110 patients were included for analysis; median age was 73 years (interquartile range 62–85 years) and 1,259 (60%) were male. Per ED/hospital providers, the use of any anticoagulant or antiplatelet agent was identified in 595 (28.2%) patients. Kappa statistics between EMS and ED/hospital providers for the specific agents were: 0.76 (95% CI 0.71–0.82) for warfarin, 0.45 (95% CI 0.19–0.71) for DOAC agents, 0.33 (95% CI 0.28–0.39) for aspirin, and 0.51 (95% CI 0.42–0.60) for other antiplatelet agents. Conclusions: The use of antiplatelet or anticoagulant medications in older adults who are transported by EMS for head trauma is common. EMS and ED/hospital providers have acceptable agreement with preinjury warfarin use but not with DOAC, aspirin, and other antiplatelet use.     

T HE E FFECTS OF P REHOSPITAL A DVANCED L IFE S UPPORT D RUG T REATMENT ON P ATIENT I MPROVEMENT AND I N-HOSPITAL U TILIZATION

Objective. There is little published evidence to support the benefits of prehospital drug administration by ambulance personnel in reducing subsequent hospital utilization by the medical patients receiving such drugs. The authors studied the outcome of patients treated by Ontario's Emergency Health Services “Symptom Relief Drug Program,” which was developed to relieve patient symptoms in the field for specific medical emergencies. Methods. A retrospective study spanning a three-year period from January 1996 to December 1998 was undertaken in a mid-sized southern Ontario community. From a review of ambulance call reports (ACRs), eligible patients were recruited by mail and divided into two groups: those treated before the introduction of the program (pre) and those treated after (post). Out-of-hospital data were retrieved from ACRs and in-hospital data were gathered from medical chart reviews. Outcomes included emergency department (ED) length of stay (LOS), frequency of admissions, and departmental use. Secondary endpoints included differences in prehospital improvement, ED interventions, and ambulance scene times. Results. For the unpaired analysis, 406 patients provided consent (pre: 215 vs post: 191). Ambulance time on scene was longer in the post group, 14.2 minutes (95% CI 13.7–14.8), versus the pre group, 12.3 minutes (95% CI 11.7–12.9), p < 0.001. A larger proportion of patients receiving prehospital drug treatment were judged to have improved on ED arrival (pre: 19.5% vs post: 48.2%, χ² p < 0.0001). The ED LOSs did not differ between groups (pre: 206.9?min, 95% CI 185.9–230.4, vs post: 220.9?min, 95% CI 196.9–247.7, p = 0.42) but were shorter within the post group for hypoglycemic patients receiving glucagon. The overall proportion of admissions was significantly lower in the post group (pre: 145 [67.4%] vs post: 102 [54.3%], χ² p < 0.01), and this was driven by chest pain patients. Conclusions. The lower rate of admissions for chest pain patients is the first published evidence of prehospital drug treatment's reducing hospital utilization in a subgroup of such medical patients. The “Symptom Relief Drug Program” is effective in improving patients' field conditions and can decrease ED LOS in hypoglycemic persons receiving glucagon injections. More outcome research pertaining to ambulance-administered prehospital drug treatment is warranted.     

Implementation of a Prehospital Protocol Change For Asthmatic Children

Background: Respiratory distress due to asthma is a common reason for pediatric emergency medical services (EMS) transports. Timely initiation of asthma treatment, including glucocorticoids, improves hospital outcomes. The impact of EMS-administered glucocorticoids on hospital-based outcomes for pediatric asthma patients is unknown. Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of an evidence-based pediatric EMS asthma protocol update, inclusive of oral glucocorticoid administration, on time to hospital discharge. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of children (2–18 years) with an acute asthma exacerbation transported by an urban EMS system to 10 emergency departments over 2 years. The investigators implemented an EMS protocol update one year into the study period requiring glucocorticoid administration for all patients, with the major change being inclusion of oral dexamethasone (0.6 mg/kg, max. dose = 10 mg). Protocol implementation included mandatory paramedic training. Data was abstracted from linked prehospital and hospital records. Continuous data were compared before and after the protocol change with the Mann-Whitney test, and categorical data were compared with the Pearson χ² test. Results: During the study period, 482 asthmatic children met inclusion criteria. After the protocol change, patients were more likely to receive a prehospital glucocorticoid (11% vs. 18%, p = 0.02). Median total hospital time after the protocol change decreased from 6.1 hours (95% CI: 5.4–6.8) to 4.5 hours (95% CI: 4.2–4.8), p < 0.001. Total care time, defined as time from ambulance arrival to hospital discharge, also decreased [6.6 hours (95% CI: 5.8–7.3) vs. 5.2 hours (95% CI: 4.8–5.6), p = 0.01]. Overall, patients were less likely to be admitted to the hospital (30% vs. 21%, p = 0.02) after the change. Those with more severe exacerbations were less likely to be admitted to a critical care unit (82% vs. 44%, p = 0.02) after the change, rather than an acute care floor. Conclusions: Prehospital protocol change for asthmatic children is associated with shorter total hospital and total care times. This protocol change was also associated with decreased hospitalization rates and less need for critical care in those hospitalized. Further study is necessary to determine if other factors also contributed     

ED handoffs: observed practices and communication errors

Objective

The study objectives were to identify emergency department (ED) handoff practices and describe handoff communication errors among emergency physicians.

Methods

Two investigators observed patient handoffs among emergency physicians in a major metropolitan teaching hospital for 8 weeks. A data collection form was designed to assess handoff characteristics including duration, location, interruptions, and topics including examination, laboratory examinations, diagnosis, and disposition. Handoff errors were defined as clinically significant examination or laboratory findings in physician documentation that were reported significantly differently during or omitted from verbal handoff. Multivariate negative binomial regression models assessed variables associated with these errors. The study was approved by the institutional review board.

Results

One hundred ten handoff sessions encompassing 992 patients were observed. Examination handoff errors and omissions were noted in 130 (13.1%) and 447 (45.1%) handoffs, respectively. More examination errors were associated with longer handoff time per patient, whereas fewer examination omissions were associated with use of written or electronic support materials. Laboratory handoff errors and omissions were noted in 37 (3.7%) and 290 (29.2%) handoffs, respectively. Fewer laboratory errors were associated with use of electronic support tools, whereas more laboratory handoff omissions were associated with longer ED lengths of stay.

Conclusions

Clinically pertinent findings reported in ED physician handoff often differ from findings reported in physician documentation. These errors and omissions are associated with handoff time per patient, ED length of stay, and use of support materials. Future research should focus on ED handoff standardization protocols, handoff error reduction techniques, and the impact of handoff on patient outcomes.     

Flight Versus Ground Out-of-hospital Rapid Sequence Intubation Success: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Introduction: Endotracheal intubation (ETI) is a critical procedure performed by both air medical and ground based emergency medical services (EMS). Previous work has suggested that ETI success rates are greater for air medical providers. However, air medical providers may have greater airway experience, enhanced airway education, and access to alternative ETI options such as rapid sequence intubation (RSI). We sought to analyze the impact of the type of EMS on RSI success. Methods: A systematic literature search of Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was conducted and eligibility, data extraction, and assessment of risk of bias were assessed independently by two reviewers. A bias-adjusted meta-analysis using a quality-effects model was conducted for the primary outcomes of overall intubation success and first-pass intubation success. Results: Forty-nine studies were included in the meta-analysis. There was no difference in the overall success between flight and ground based EMS; 97% (95% CI 96–98) vs. 98% (95% CI 91–100), and no difference in first-pass success for flight compared to ground based RSI; 82% (95% CI 73–89) vs. 82% (95% CI 70–93). Compared to flight non-physicians, flight physicians have higher overall success 99% (95% CI 98–100) vs. 96% (95% CI 94–97) and first-pass success 89% (95% CI 77–98) vs. 71% (95% CI 57–84). Ground-based physicians and non-physicians have a similar overall success 98% (95% CI 88–100) vs. 98% (95% CI 95–100), but no analysis for physician ground first pass was possible. Conclusions: Both overall and first-pass success of RSI did not differ between flight and road based EMS. Flight physicians have a higher overall and first-pass success compared to flight non-physicians and all ground based EMS, but no such differences are seen for ground EMS. Our results suggest that ground EMS can use RSI with similar outcomes compared to their flight counterparts.     

Can Prehospital Personnel Accurately Triage Patients for Large Vessel Occlusion Strokes?

BackgroundThe Field Assessment Stroke Triage for Emergency Destination (FAST-ED) score was developed in the hospital setting to be used in the prehospital setting. It has been shown to have higher predictive value than comparable stroke scales, including the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, for identifying large vessel occlusion strokes.ObjectiveWe sought to determine whether prehospital FAST-ED scores are comparable with FAST-ED scores determined by emergency physicians.MethodsEmergency Medical Services (EMS) personnel were trained to calculate a FAST-ED score for any patient suspected of having a stroke in the field. When the patient arrived at our ED, an emergency physician generated a FAST-ED score.ResultsOne hundred and thirty-five patients were studied and large vessel occlusions were detected in 23.7%. There was no significant difference between median FAST-ED scores from EMS personnel (3; interquartile range [IQR] 1–5) and emergency physician (2; IQR 1–6). The difference between paired scores was not significantly different from 0 (median of paired differences was 0). In addition, prehospital FAST-ED scores were significantly and positively correlated with physician FAST-ED scores (r² = 0.26). Comparable receiver operator curve area under the curve values were obtained for EMS FAST-ED (0.727; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.638–0.816) and ED FAST-ED (0.769; 95% CI 0.669–0.868).ConclusionsThe findings validate that prehospital FAST-ED scores are comparable in predictive value to FAST-ED scores calculated in the ED for prediction of large vessel occlusion strokes.     

Accuracy of Paramedic Broselow Tape Use in the Prehospital Setting

Introduction. Previous literature has documented that prehospital 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG) decreases the time to reperfusion in patients with an acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Objective. To compare time to ECG, time to angioplasty suite (laboratory), andtime to reperfusion in emergency medical services (EMS) STEMI patients, who received care through three different processes. Methods. The setting was a large suburban community teaching hospital with emergency department (ED)-initiated single-page acute myocardial infarction (AMI) team activation for STEMI patients. The population was STEMI patients transported by EMS from January 2003 to October 2005. Not all EMS agencies had prehospital 12-lead ECG capability. Paramedics interpret andverbally report clinical assessment andECG findings via radio. The AMI team is activated at the discretion of the emergency physician 1) before patient arrival to the ED based on EMS assessment, 2) after ED evaluation with EMS ECG, or 3) after ED evaluation andED ECG. Time intervals were calculated from ED arrival. To assess the impact of interventions on performance targets, we also report the proportion of patients who arrived in laboratory within 60 minutes andreperfusion within 90 minutes of arrival. Parametric andnonparametric statistics are used for analysis. Results. During the study period, there were 164 STEMI patients transported by EMS; mean age was 66.1 years, and56% were male. Of these, 93 (56.7%) had an EMS ECG and31 (33%) had AMI team activation before ED arrival. Mean time to laboratory for all patients was 49.8 ± 34.4 minutes andtime to reperfusion was 93.2 +/? 34.5 min. Patients with prearrival activation were transported to laboratory sooner (mean, 24.3 vs. 53. 4 minutes; p < 0.001) andreceived reperfusion sooner than all other patients (mean, 70.4 vs. 96.3 minutes; p = 0.007). More prearrival activation patients met performance targets to laboratory (96.7% vs. 73.7%; p = 0.009) andreperfusion (85.2% vs. 51.0%; p = 0.003). There was no difference in time to laboratory or to reperfusion for patients who received EMS ECG but no prearrival activation compared with those who received EMS transport alone. Conclusions. A minority of patients with EMS ECGs had prearrival AMI team activation. EMS ECGs combined with systems that activate hospital resources, but not EMS ECGs alone, decrease time to laboratory andreperfusion.     

Factors Related to the Sensitivity of Emergency Medical Service Impression of Stroke

Abstract

Objectives. To examine factors related to sensitivity of emergency medical services (EMS) stroke impression. Methods. We reviewed ambulance and hospital records of all patients transported to Long Island College Hospital between January 1, 2009 and January 1, 2011 by the hospital-based EMS with a discharge diagnosis of stroke or a confounding diagnosis, and compared EMS impression to hospital discharge diagnosis. We examined relationships between EMS diagnostic sensitivity and age, gender, ethnicity, NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS), motor signs, aphasia, neglect, lesion side, circulation, stroke type, EMS provider level, and documented Cincinnati Pre-hospital Stroke Scale (CPSS) with contingency analysis and logistic regression. Results. Stroke was validated in 18% (56/310) of patients and 50% (28/56) of these were missed by EMS. EMS diagnostic sensitivity was 50% (95% CI: 36–64%), and was related to NIHSS quartile (p = 0.014), with higher sensitivities in 2nd (69%; 95% CI: 44–86%) and 3rd (75%; 95% CI: 47–91%) vs. 1st (20%; 95% CI: 7–45%) and 4th (45%; 95% CI: 21–72%) quartiles, motor signs (62 vs. 14%, p = 0.002), and documented CPSS (84 vs. 32%, p = 0.0002). EMS impression was independently related to NIHSS quartile (1st vs. 2nd adjusted OR = 9.61, 1.13–122.03, p = 0.038) and CPSS (adjusted OR = 12.58, 2.22–111.06, p = 0.003). Conclusion. Stroke was missed more frequently when CPSS was not documented, in patients without motor signs, and in patients with moderate–severe stroke. The sensitivity of prehospital screening for patients with moderate–severe stroke might be improved by including additional non-motor signs and by stressing indications for when screens should be performed.     

Is it Appropriate for Patients to be Discharged at the Scene by Paramedics?

Background: Outcomes of patients who are discharged at the scene by paramedics are not fully understood. Objective: We aimed to describe the risk of re-presentation and/or death in prehospital patients discharged at the scene. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using linked ambulance, emergency department (ED), and death data. We compared outcomes in patients who were discharged at the scene by paramedics with those who were transported to ED by paramedics and then discharged from ED between January 1 and December 31, 2013 in metropolitan Perth, Western Australia. Occurrences of subsequent ambulance requests, ED attendance, hospital admission and death were compared between those discharged at the scene and those discharged from ED. Results: There were 47,330 patients during the study period, of whom 19,732 and 27,598 patients were discharged at the scene and from ED, respectively. Compared to those discharged from ED, those discharged at the scene were more likely to subsequently: request an ambulance (6.1% vs. 1.8%, adjusted odds ratio [adj OR] 3.4; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.0–3.9), attend ED (4.6% vs. 1.4%, adj OR 3.3; 95% CI 2.8–3.8), be admitted to hospital (3.3% vs. 0.8%, adj OR 4.2; 95% CI 3.4–5.1). Those discharged at the scene tended towards an increased likelihood of death (0.2% vs. 0.1%, adj OR 1.8; 95% CI 0.99–3.2) within 24 hours of discharge compared to those discharged from ED. Conclusion: Patients attended by paramedics who were discharged at the scene had more subsequent events than those who were transported to and discharged from ED. Further consideration needs to be given to who is suitable to be discharged at the scene by paramedics.     

Effect of System-Wide Interventions on the Assessment and Treatment of Pain by Emergency Medical Services Providers

Background: An estimated 20% of patients arriving by ambulance to the emergency department are in moderate to severe pain. However, the management of pain in the prehospital setting has been shown to be inadequate. Untreated pain may have negative physiologic and psychological consequences. The prehospital community has acknowledged this inadequacy and made treatment of pain a priority. Objectives: To determine if system-wide pain management improvement efforts (i.e. education and protocol implementation) improve the assessment of pain and treatment with opioid medications in the prehospital setting and to determine if improvements are maintained over time. Methods: This was a retrospective before and after study of a countywide prehospital patient care database. The study population included all adult patients transported by EMS between February 2004 and February 2012 with a working assessment of trauma or burn. EMS patient care records were searched for documentation of pain scores and opioid administration. Four time periods were examined: 1) before interventions, 2) after pediatric specific pain management education, 3) after pain management protocol implementation, and 4) maintenance phase. Frequencies and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for all patients meeting the inclusion criteria in each time period and Chi-square was used to compare frequencies between time periods. Results: 15,228 adult patients transported by EMS during the study period met the inclusion criteria. Subject demographics were similar between the four time periods. Pain score documentation improved between the time periods but was not maintained over time (13% [95%CI 12–15%] to 32% [95%CI 31–34%] to 29% [95 CI 27–30%] to 19% [95%CI 18–21%]). Opioid administration also improved between the time periods and was maintained over time (7% [95%CI 6–8%] to 18% [95%CI 16–19%] to 24% [95%CI 22–25%] to 23% [95% CI 22–24%]). Conclusions: In adult patients both pediatric-focused education and pain protocol implementation improved the administration of opioid pain medications. Documentation and assessment of pain scores was less affected by specific pain management improvement efforts.     

Comparison of children receiving emergent sepsis care by mode of arrival

ObjectiveTo determine if differences in patient characteristics, treatments, and outcomes exist between children with sepsis who arrive by emergency medical services (EMS) versus their own mode of transport (self-transport).MethodsRetrospective cohort study of patients who presented to the Emergency Department (ED) of two large children's hospitals and treated for sepsis from November 2013 to June 2017. Presentation, ED treatment, and outcomes, primarily time to first bolus and first parental antibiotic, were compared between those transported via EMS versus patients who were self-transported.ResultsOf the 1813 children treated in the ED for sepsis, 1452 were self-transported and 361 were transported via EMS. The EMS group were more frequently male, of black race, and publicly insured than the self-transport group. The EMS group was more likely to have a critical triage category, receive initial care in the resuscitation suite (51.9 vs. 22%), have hypotension at ED presentation (14.4 vs. 5.4%), lactate >2.0 mmol/L (60.6 vs. 40.8%), vasoactive agents initiated in the ED (8.9 vs. 4.9%), and to be intubated in the ED (14.4 vs. 2.8%). The median time to first IV fluid bolus was faster in the EMS group (36 vs. 57 min). Using Cox LASSO to adjust for potential covariates, time to fluids remained faster for the EMS group (HR 1.26, 95% CI 1.12, 1.42). Time to antibiotics, ICU LOS, 3- or 30-day mortality rates did not differ, yet median hospital LOS was significantly longer in those transported by EMS versus self-transported (6.5 vs. 5.3 days).ConclusionsChildren with sepsis transported by EMS are a sicker population of children than those self-transported on arrival and had longer hospital stays. EMS transport was associated with earlier in-hospital fluid resuscitation but no difference in time to first antibiotic. Improved prehospital recognition and care is needed to promote adherence to both prehospital and hospital-based sepsis resuscitation benchmarks.     

Emergency Medical Services Provider Experiences of Hospice Care

Background: Growing numbers of emergency medical services (EMS) providers respond to patients who receive hospice care. The objective of this investigation was to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and experiences of EMS providers in the care of patients enrolled in hospice care. Methods: We conducted a survey study of EMS providers regarding hospice care. We collected quantitative and qualitative data on EMS provider's knowledge, attitudes, and experiences in responding to the care needs of patients in hospice care. We used Chi-squared tests to compare EMS provider's responses by credential (Emergency Medical Technician [EMT] vs. Paramedic) and years of experience (0–5 vs. 5+). We conducted a thematic analysis to examine open-ended responses to qualitative questions. Results: Of the 182 EMS providers who completed the survey (100% response rate), 84.1% had cared for a hospice patient one or more times. Respondents included 86 (47.3%) EMTs with Intermediate and Advanced training and 96 (52.7%) Paramedics. Respondent's years of experience ranged from 0–10+ years, with 99 (54.3%) providers having 0–5 years of experience and 83 (45.7%) providers having 5+ years of experience. There were no significant differences between EMTs and Paramedics in their knowledge of the care of these patients, nor were there significant differences (p < 0.05) between those with 0–5 and 5+ years of experience. Furthermore, 53 (29.1%) EMS providers reported receiving formal education on the care of hospice patients. A total of 36% respondents felt that patients in hospice care required a DNR order. In EMS providers' open-ended responses on challenges in responding to the care needs of hospice patients, common themes were family-related challenges, and the need for more education. Conclusion: While the majority of EMS providers have responded to patients enrolled in hospice care, few providers received formal training on how to care for this population. EMS providers have expressed a need for a formal curriculum on the care of the patient receiving hospice.