Delayed complications following pacemaker implantation

Acute complications resulting from permanent pacemaker implantation are well known and include perforation of the right atrium or right ventricle. Recently, several reports have described the occurrence of perforation and pericarditis as late complications following pacemaker implantation. These complications may occur days to weeks following uncomplicated pacemaker implantation and may lead to death if they are not recognized early. Five patients with late complications caused by active-fixation leads are reported and the clinical features of their presentation and management are reviewed. Late perforation of the right atrium or right ventricle is an uncommon complication after pacemaker implantation but should be suspected by the general cardiologist in a patient who has a device implanted within a week to several months prior to the development of chest pain.     

Effects of Internal Defibrillation on an Implanted Pacing System with Programmable Polarity

Management of multiple cardiac arrhythmias in some patients with both an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and a pacemaker has demonstrated several advantages. In such circumstances, it is imperative that pacemaker function and its programmed parameters be preserved following a deftbrillation shock. This article describes the effects encountered by a specific programmable polarity pacemaker (Relay® 294–03) when subjected to electrical defibrillation in a canine model. Three pacemakers were repeatedly tested in three separate dog experiments. Each pacemaker, with its leads implanted in the right atrium and the right ventricle, was subjected to a minimum total number of 24 high energy biphasic and monophasic shocks (600–700 V) delivered by a coexisting ICD system using three different defibrillating lead configurations. None of the pacemaker systems showed any failure in function; all pacemakers continued to function within preshock specification and conversion to unipolar pacing and/ or backup mode was not observed in any of the tests. Intracardiac electrical potentials measured directly off the ICD and the pacemaker leads, during a defibrillation shock (mean 566.6 V; 23.7 J), showed that potentials measured in a bipolar configuration (tip-ring: mean 21.0 V in atrium, 12.0 V in ventricle) were significantly less than potentials measured in a unipolar configuration (tip-can: mean 387.9 V in atrium, 394.0 V in ventricle; ring-can: mean 405.6 V in atrium, 395.4 V in ventricle). Our compatibility tests demonstrate that use of this programmable-polarity pacemaker in concert with an ICD system appears to be safe. Testing similar to the present study should be conducted prior to complete clinical acceptance of combined ICD and pacemaker implantation.     

Atrial Pacing via Unilateral Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava

A patient who suffered from sinus node dysfunction and automatic atrial tachycardias underwent pacemaker implantation during which time a unilateral left superior vena cava was found. Despite the known difficulties in using this venous route, it was possible to place a transvenous endocardial screw-in lead in a stable position in the lower lateral wall of the right atrium.     

Spontaneous Twisting of an Implanted Pacemaker Electrode in Three Cases

We present three cases of an unusual pacing lead aberration occurring at different times after implantation. In the first patient, the electrode was twisted close to the pacemaker, and dislodgment occurred on the 40th postoperative day. In the second case, there was only proximal twisting of the electrode. In the third case the electrode was twisted in two places: proximal to the pacemaker, and distal, within the right atrium. The complication was managed successfully by reimplanting the same electrode after stiffening the lead near the generator with a portion of the stylet.     

Single-lead VDD pacemaker implantation via persistent left superior vena cava: an improved technique and a new modality

Persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC), which occurs in approximately 0.5% of the general population, may complicate pacemaker implantation by making lead insertion into the right ventricle more difficult and increasing lead instability when the transvenous approach is attempted. We describe our experience with four PLSVC patients with pacemakers. We developed an open J-loop technique in which the stylet tip is directed toward the orifice of the tricuspid valve anteroinferiorly. The lead was implanted into the right ventricular apex without difficulty. Three of our patients had high-degree atrioventricular block and received VVI pacemakers with the new technique. One patient with complete atrioventricular block received a single-lead VDD pacemaker by means of the same technique, with the paired electrodes positioned in the lower right atrium. Excellent results were obtained on exercise tolerance testing, 24-hour Holter monitoring, and echocardiographically determined systolic and diastolic function. This improved technique can simplify pacemaker implantation in patients with PLSVC. The VDD device is a new way to maintain systolic and diastolic function and is an appropriate option in patients with high-degree atrioventricular block and PLSVC who require pacemaker implantation.     

An approach to ablate and pace:AV junction ablation and pacemaker implantation performed concurrently from the same venous access site

BACKGROUND: Atrioventricular junction (AVJ) ablation combined with permanent pacemaker implantation (the "ablate and pace" approach) remains an acceptable alternative treatment strategy for symptomatic, drug-refractory atrial fibrillation (AF) with rapid ventricular response. This case series describes the feasibility and safety of catheter ablation of the AVJ via a superior vena caval approach performed during concurrent dual-chamber pacemaker implantation. METHODS: A total of 17 consecutive patients with symptomatic, drug-refractory, paroxysmal AF underwent combined AVJ ablation and dual-chamber pacemaker implantation procedure using a left axillary venous approach. Two separate introducer sheaths were placed into the axillary vein. The first sheath was used for implantation of the pacemaker ventricular lead, which was then connected to the pulse generator. Subsequently, a standard ablation catheter was introduced through the second axillary venous sheath and used for radiofrequency (RF) ablation of the AVJ. After successful ablation, the catheter was withdrawn and the pacemaker atrial lead was advanced through that same sheath and implanted in the right atrium. RESULTS: Catheter ablation of the AVJ was successfully achieved in all patients. The median number of RF applications required to achieve complete AV block was three (range 1-10). In one patient, AV conduction recovered within the first hour after completion of the procedure, and AVJ ablation was then performed using the conventional femoral venous approach. There were no procedural complications. CONCLUSION: Catheter ablation of the AVJ can be performed successfully and safely via a superior vena caval approach in patients undergoing concurrent dual-chamber pacemaker implantation.     

Implantation of Dual Chamber Pacemaker in a Patient with Persistent Left Superior Vena Cava

A 35-year-old patient underwent permanent pacemaker implantation because of symptomatic sinus bradycardia. During the procedure, persistent left superior vena cava was found. The ventricular lead crossed the tricuspid valve only after curving the stylet to form a loop in the right atrium (RA); subsequently, the curved stylet was changed to a straight one and the lead was positioned and screwed into the right ventricular apex. The atrial lead positioning was possible when the stylet was slightly curved and the lead could reach the anterior wall of the RA. At 18 months, a follow-up revealed normal pacemaker function and stable lead position.     

Delayed pericarditis associated with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation using an active-fixation atrial lead

A 57-year-old man with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy and ventricular tachycardia underwent routine dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation. An active-fixation atrial lead was positioned at the lateral wall of the right atrium. He subsequently developed chronic severe pericarditis. Histopathological findings of the pericardium showed mechanical stimulus localized pericarditis. This case demonstrates that contact of the screw of the active-fixation atrial lead with the pericardium may be a possible mechanism for pericarditis after pacemaker/ICD implantation.     

Implantation strategy of the atrial dipole impacts atrial sensing performance of single lead VDD pacemakers

Intermittent atrial undersensing is observed in a considerable percentage of patients with single lead VDD pacemakers. Analyzing the 2-year data of the Saphir Multicenter Follow-Up Study, the authors investigated predictors for the occurrence of undersensing. The study included 194 patients with high degree AV block who received a VDD pacemaker system with an identical sensing amplifier. Placement strategy of the atrial dipole was left to the discretion of the implanting physician. At the final position, atrial potential amplitudes were measured during deep and shallow respiration. Atrial dipole position was determined by intraoperativefluoroscopy subdividing the right atrium in a high, mid, and low portion. Undersensing was defined by evidence of at least one not sensed P wave during Holter monitoring or exercise testing and by the presence of 0.1-0.2 mV amplitudes in the P wave amplitude histogram of the pacemaker. Incidence of undersensing was 25.8%; 9.3% of patients showed frequent (> 5%) or symptomatic undersensing. Patients with undersensing were older (76.6 +/- 10.6 vs 64.2 +/- 14.8 years), showed a lower minimum of intraoperative atrial potential amplitude (P(min) 0.86 +/- 0.64 vs 1.43 +/- 0.77 mV), a wider range of potential amplitude (deltaP 1.71 +/- 1.44 vs 0.94 +/- 0.84 mV), and a higher incidence of dipole placement in the low right atrium (50.0% vs 11.1 %, P < 0.001 for all comparisons). In a multivariate regression analysis, patient age > 66 years, Pmin < 0.6 mV, > 1.3 mV and atrial dipol placement in the lowright atrium were independently predictive for undersensing. Minimal atrialpotential amplitude, range of potential amplitude, and atrial dipole position influence atrial sensing performance in single lead VDD pacing. Thus, implantation guidelines should reflect these rules to improve the outcome of VDD pacemaker recipients.     

Acute Pericarditis Resulting From an Endocardial Active Fixation Screw-In Atrial Lead

We examined the occurrence of acute pericarditis after pacemaker implantation in 123 consecutive patients (61 males, 62 females, ages 17–87 years) in whom a newer atrial active fixation bipolar lead was inserted endocardially in the right atrium for dual chamber pacing. The atrial leads were positioned to obtain the best possible pacing and sensing thresholds, after an initial attempt was made for insertion into the right atrial appendage or medially into the right atrial septum. Six patients (4.9%) developed acute symptomatic pericarditis with effusion within 24 hours of implantation. Of these six patients, four had leads screwed into the lateral waH. and the other two had leads placed in the anterolateral wall. The lead implantation parameters between patients with pericarditis and those without did not show any significant difference in the atrial P wave amplitude (2.3 ± 0.4 vs 2.9 ± 0.9 mV), pacing threshold (1.1 ± 0.2 vs 1.1 ± 0.4 V), or resistance (524 ± 112 vs 480 ± 94 ohms). All symptomatic patients were treated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with symptoms resolving in 1–2 weeks. We condude that: (1) a significant number of patients (4.9%) developed acute symptomatic pericarditis after insertion of this type of atrial fixation lead: (2) because of the lead design, the implantation parameters coud not be taken to predict the occurrence of pericarditis: and (3) caution should be taken for the insertion of this lead into the thin atrial wall.     

经胸二维和实时三维超声对人工心脏起搏器电极导线位置的观察

目的比较经胸二维和实时三维超声心动图在人工心脏起搏器电极导线位置定位中的应用价值。方法采用Philips公司Sonos7500型彩色超声心动图仪,经胸二维和实时三维超声心动图观察18例单腔或双腔人工心脏起搏器安置术后起搏电极导线在心腔内的行走路径、导线顶端嵌入位置以及起搏电极与三尖瓣及瓣下结构的关系。结果经胸二维超声能显示大部分患者起搏电极导线及导线顶端位置。经胸实时三维超声能清晰显示绝大部分患者起搏电极导线在心腔内的行走路径、导线顶端位置,更能立体直观显示电极导线与三尖瓣及瓣下结构的关系,结合实时三维彩色血流显像技术可观察有无三尖瓣返流及返流是否与电极导线有关。结论经胸二维和实时三维超声心动图作为对起搏器安置术后患者的随访观察有肯定的临床应用价值,实时三维超声较二维超声能更直观、准确地显示起搏电极导线在心腔内的位置、周邻关系及所致三尖瓣活动的改变,可望广泛应用于临床。     

A Simple Method for Preoperative Assessment of the Best Fitting Electrode Length in Single Lead VDD Pacing

For single lead VDD pacing, electrodes with various distances between the lead tip and the floating atrial dipole (AV distance) are available. Using different AV distances allows positioning of the atrial dipole in the mid- to high right atrium, regardless of the size of the right heart. In this position, reliable atrial sensing and rejection of ventricular far-field potentials can be expected. A simple test for the preoperative assessment of the best fitting AV distance in the individual patient was tested. We studied 24 consecutive patients prior to implantation of AVDD pacemaker. With the patient in supine position, a test electrode with an AV distance of 13 cm was taped onto the thorax. Under fluoroscopic control, it was moved until its course and projection onto the heart was equal to that of a ventricular lead. If fluoroscopy then showed a projection of the atrial dipole onto the mid- to high right atrium, a lead with a similar AV distance of 13 or 13.5 cm was used for implantation. If the atrial dipole projected itself too high or too low, a shorter or longer lead had to be implanted. The maximum time for the test was 2 minutes, and the maximum fluoroscopy time was 15 seconds. According to the test, a lead with an AV distance of 13 or 13.5 cm was implanted in 18 of 24 patients, and a lead with an AV distance of 15.5 or 16 cm was implanted in 6 of 24 patients. The atrial dipole could easily be positioned in the mid- to high right atrium in all patients, demonstrating a correct preoperative assessment of the best fitting AV distance. Intraoperatively, a P wave amplitude of 3.5 ± 3.0 mV was measured. The described test allows a fast and reliable assessment of the best fitting electrode length in single lead VDD pacing.     

Steroid Eluting High Impedance Pacing Leads Decrease Short and Long-Term Current Drain: Results from a Multicenter Clinical Trial.

Pacemaker lead technology has changed considerably over the past decades. The widespread use of low polarization highly porous electrodes and steroid elution electrodes has resulted in low chronic pacing thresholds, as well as a decrease in the incidence of exit block. Efforts to develop pacing leads with high impedance might theoretically lead to lower lead current drain, which is a component of battery capacity. Pulse generator longevity can be increased without sacrificing pacemaker capabilities if pacing current drain can be decreased. Decreasing the size of the stimulation electrode results in increased pacing impedance, and if pacing thresholds are unchanged, a decreased current drain is predicted by Ohm's law (I = V/R). There is limited data available on the pacing characteristics of large numbers of patients with high impedance leads, despite their recent general availability and increasing widespread use. This multicenter, controlled trial examined the differences in performance between standard steroid-eluting pacing leads in the atrium (Medtronic model 5524) and ventricle (Medtronic model 5024), and new high impedance steroid-eluting pacing leads in the atrium (Medtronic model 5534) and ventricle (Medtronic model 5034). Measurements of bipolar pacing thresholds at 2.5 V, pacing impedance, and sensing thresholds were determined within 24 hours of pacemaker implantation, and at 0.5, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after pacemaker implantation in 609 patients. Pacing and sensing thresholds were similar for the control and high impedance leads at all times except for a slightly larger R wave with the high impedance leads at implantation and 12 months. The mean impedance of the high impedance pacing leads in the atrium and ventricle at 12 months was 992 ± 175 and 1,080 ± 220 Ω, compared to 522 ± 69 and 600 ± 89 Ω for the standard pacing leads in the atrium and ventricle (P ≤ 0.001 for the high impedance leads compared to standard leads in each chamber). The mean atrial lead current (measured at 2.5 V) at 12 months was 2.6 ± 0.5 mA with the high impedance lead, and 4.9 ± 0.7 mA with the standard lead in the atrium (P ≤ 0.001). In the ventricle, the mean lead current at 12 months was 2.4 ± 0.4 mA with the high impedance pacing lead and 4.3 ± 0.6 mA with the standard lead (P ≤ 0.001). High impedance leads are associated with lower lead current drain than standard pacing leads in the atrium and ventricle for up to 1 year. No clinically important differences in sensing characteristics was noted with the high impedance leads in the atrium or ventricle compared to standard pacing leads. High impedance leads may result in increased pulse generator longevity.     

Atrio-ventricular synchronization by single VDD lead inserted through persistent left superior vena cava in patient with Turner's syndrome

A 71-year-old woman with Turner's syndrome underwent pacemaker implantation for complete atrio-ventricular block. During the procedure, the persistence of left sided superior vena cava (LSVC) was observed such that the lead, through the coronary sinus, reached the right atrium. By use of stylets, we could drive the lead against the lateral atrial wall and curve it through the tricuspid valve into the right ventricle. The tip reached an apical stable position, obtaining proper stimulation values. Moreover, the VDD dipole was positioned against high lateral atrial wall, adequately sensing the atrial potential. So, we could obtain an atrial synchronous ventricular pacing with only one VDD lead.     

Usefulness of Echocardiography to Predict Inappropriate Atrial Sensing in Single-Lead VDD Pacing

Reliable atrial sensing is the prerequisite for restoration of atrioventricular synchrony in patients with single-lead VDD pacing systems. To determine echocardiographic variables associated with inappropriate atrial sensing, 21 consecutive patients with symptomatic second- or third-degree AV block and normal sinus node function were studied. Prior to implantation echocardiographic measurements of end-systolic and end-diastolic dimensions and volumes of the right atrium and right ventricle were performed. All patients underwent implantation of a Medtronic Thera VDD(d) pacemaker with a bipolar Medtronic Capsure electrode. A minimal amplitude of the unfiltered atrial electrocardiogram of > or =0.5 mV was required for permanent lead position and the atrial sensitivity was programmed below the lowest recorded value. Appropriate atrial sensing (atrial triggered ventricular paced complexes/total number of ventricular paced complexes) was assessed during 24-hour Holter monitoring and treadmill exercise testing 3 to 6 weeks after implantation. Inappropriate atrial sensing (<95% correct atrial synchronization during Holter registration and/or <97.5% during exercise testing) was present in nine patients. Right atrial volumes and the right ventricular end-diastolic volume was significantly higher, as compared to patients without inappropriate sensing (12 patients). The right atrial and diastolic volumes had the highest correlation with correct atrial sensing r = 0.83, P<0.0001). Using a postdefined cut-off value of > or =80 mL for the end-diastolic right atrial volume, sensitivity and specificity for inappropriate sensing was 100% and 92%, respectively. These findings show that preimplant echocardiography can identify patients with inappropriate sensing during VDD pacing, in whom DDD pacing should be considered.     

Venospasm in Contrast Venography-Guided Axillary Vein Puncture for Pacemaker Lead Implantation

CHAN, N.-Y., et al. : Venospasm in Contrast Venography-Guided Axillary Vein Puncture for Pacemaker Lead Implantation. Venospasm is a recognized complication in right heart catheterization and the reported incidence is 2%. Contrast venography guided axillary vein puncture was a recently described technique for pacemaker lead implantation. This report describes a case of venospasm of the axillary vein during pacemaker implantation. (PACE 2003; 26[Pt. I]:112–113)     

Transvenous pacing via a disconnected superior vena cava in a patient with transposition of the great arteries

We describe successful implantation of a permanent pacemaker via the right subclavian vein in a 28-year-old man with operated transposition of the great arteries where the superior vena cava is completely disconnected from the systemic venous atrium following a previous Glenn procedure.     

Recurrent Pulmonary Embolization Following Implantation of Transvenous Pacemaker

A 44-year-old man developed recurrent pulmonary embolization after implantation of a permanent transvenous DVI pacemaker connected to polyurethane leads. Thrombus was found in the left innominate and subclavian veins around the pacemaker leads, but not in the right atrium or in the venous system of the pelvis and the lower extremities. The recurrence of pulmonary embolization followed discontinuation of treatment with Coumadin. This case demonstrates that lifelong anticoagulation is indicated in patients who have had pulmonary embolization and/or venous thrombosis around the pacemaker leads.     

Long-Term Antitachycardia Pacing Experience for Supraventricular Tachycardia

A pacemaker was used to control drug-resistant reentrant supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) in 40 patients. An antitachycardia pacemaker was implanted in 37 for SVT; in one for ventricular tachycardia that could also be used to terminate SVT; in one SVT could be terminated with an activity rate variable pacemaker; and in one a DDD pacemaker was used for prevention and termination of SVT. Twenty patients had AV nodal reentrant tachycardias, eight had tachycardias due to a concealed accessory pathway, eight had a Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, three had reentrant atrial tachycardias, and one had atrial flutter. Twenty-two patients were paced from the right atrium, five from the coronary sinus, ten from the right ventricle, and three had a DDD pacemaker. During a total follow-up period of 1,503 (mean 38) months an estimated 16,240 episodes of tachycardia were terminated promptly at home, 58 required several attempts, 57 episodes lasted longer than 30 minutes but did not require medical attention, and 11 required hospital admission. Hospital admission for SVT decreased from one per patient-month (in the 3 months before implantation) to 1 per 137 patient-months after implantation. Additional reentrant tachycardias occurred in 13 patients. Antiarrhythmic drug therapy in combination with a conservative antitachycardia pacing mode was required in four patients paced from the atrium to avoid pacing induced atrial fibrillation. Antiarrhythmic drug therapy was used in 42% of patients to help control SVT. Conclusions: (1) Drug-resistant SVTs can be safely and effectively managed on the long-term with antitachycardia pacemakers. (2) Rapid termination of SVT improved the quality-of-life significantly by avoiding prolonged episodes of tachycardia and repetitive hospital admissions.     

Inadvertent Left Ventricle Endocardial or Uncomplicated Right Ventricular Pacing: How to Differentiate in the Emergency Department

Background

Temporary transvenous pacemaker implantation is an important and critical procedure for emergency physicians. Traditionally, temporary pacemakers are inserted by electrocardiography (ECG) guidance in the emergency department because fluoroscopy at the bedside in an unstable patient can be limited by time and equipment availability. However, in the presence of atrial septal defect, ventricular septal defect, and patent foramen ovale, the pacemaker lead can be implanted inadvertently into the left ventricle or directly into the coronary sinus instead of right ventricle. Regular pacemaker rhythm can be achieved despite inadvertent implantation of the pacemaker lead into the left ventricle, leading to ignorance of the possibility of lead malposition.