脑胶质瘤MGMT、hMLH1和hMSH2基因启动子甲基化状态研究

目的：探讨脑胶质瘤患者O6-甲基鸟嘌呤-DNA甲基转移酶基因MGMT和错配修复基因hMLH1、hMSH2启动子CpG岛甲基化状态,及其在烷化剂化疗中的意义。方法：采用甲基化特异性PCR（MSP）方法检测39例脑胶质瘤和6例正常脑组织MGMT、hMLH1和hMSH2基因启动子区的甲基化状态,免疫组化方法测定蛋白表达。结果：脑胶质瘤患者组织MGMT、hMLH1和hMSH2基因启动子区甲基化发生率分别为46.2%、10.3%和20.5%,3种基因启动子未甲基化模式与其对应蛋白表达模式相似,并与患者性别、年龄、病理类型和病理分级无明显相关性。回顾性分析患者资料,显示39例脑胶质瘤患者中,MGMT基因甲基化的患者生存期显著高于MGMT基因未甲基化患者（P〈0.05,Log-rank检验）。结论：MGMT及错配修复基因甲基化是脑胶质瘤发生过程中常见的分子事件,可能与肿瘤的发生有关;检测MGMT、hMLH1和hMSH2基因启动子甲基化状态,在判断脑胶质瘤患者预后和预测烷化剂化疗耐药性中可能具有重要意义。     

MGMT基因启动子甲基化与膀胱尿路上皮癌生物学行为关系的研究

目的 检测膀胱尿路上皮癌组织中O^6-甲基鸟嘌呤-DNA甲基转移酶（MGMT）基因启动子甲基化状态,探讨MGMT甲基化与其蛋白表达水平以及肿瘤生物学行为之间的关系.方法 应用免疫组织化学SP法和甲基化特异性PCR（MSP）分别检测60例膀胱尿路上皮癌及15例正常膀胱黏膜组织中MGMT蛋白表达情况和MGMT基因启动子甲基化状态.结果 膀胱癌组织中MGMT蛋白阳性表达率为35.0 %（21/60）,低于正常膀胱组织（86.7 %,13/15,P〈0.01）.膀胱癌组织中MGMT甲基化阳性率为45.0 %（27/60）,明显高于正常膀胱组织（0.0 %,0/15,P〈0.01）;MGMT启动子甲基化与其蛋白表达呈负相关（r = -0.453,P〈0.01）;并且高级别膀胱癌中MGMT甲基化阳性率（70.6 %,12/17）要比低级别膀胱癌高（34.9 %,15/43）,（P〈0.05）,而MGMT甲基化与膀胱癌临床分期无明显关系.结论 MGMT启动子甲基化可能参与了膀胱尿路上皮癌的发生和肿瘤分化,MGMT启动子甲基化有望成为预判膀胱癌预后的重要标记.     

脑胶质瘤患者组织和血清MGMT、hMLH1和hMSH2基因启动子甲基化状态检测

目的探讨脑胶质瘤患者组织和血清中MGMT、hMLH1和hMSH2基因启动子CpG岛甲基化发生率及相关性。方法甲基化特异性PCR（MSP）检测39例脑胶质瘤组织样本及32例预处理的脑胶质瘤血清样本中MGMT、hMLH1和hMSH2基因启动子区的甲基化状态。结果脑胶质瘤组织MGMT、hMLH1和hMSH2基因启动子区甲基化发生率分别为46．2％、10．3％和20．5％,肿瘤组织中至少有一种基因甲基化的发生率为64．1％（25／39）;在脑胶质瘤患者外周循环血液中检测到了相关基因甲基化系列,并且与组织中基因甲基化发生率明显相关。结论MGMT、hMLH1和hMSH2基因启动子甲基化是脑胶质瘤发生过程中常见的分子事件,血清中相关基因DNA甲基化检测有可能为脑胶质瘤诊断和个体化化疗提供一种稳定的无创性检测指标。     

人脑胶质瘤细胞中GDNF 基因启动子1 区甲基化状态的研究

目的:观察GDNF启动子1区在人脑胶质瘤细胞中的甲基化修饰状态,以期探讨其对于GDNF在胶质瘤中高表达的影响。方法:基因测序检测10例胶质瘤与5例正常脑组织中GDNF基因序列,比较其基因是否有突变发生;重亚硫酸盐修饰后基因测序检测20例胶质瘤(10例低级别和10例高级别)与5例正常脑组织中GDNF启动子1区甲基化修饰状态。结果:GDNF启动子1区基因在胶质瘤中没有发生突变;GDNF启动子1区甲基化修饰在正常脑组织、低级别、高级别中发生率分别为72.25%、86.25%、86.75%。在胶质瘤中的甲基化修饰水平比正常脑组织明显增高(P<0.05),而高低级别之间无显著性差异。结论:在胶质瘤细胞中,GDNF启动子1区发生了高甲基化修饰,这种修饰很可能会影响GDNF基因的表达。     

脑胶质瘤组织中p16基因启动子区CpG岛甲基化检测及其临床意义研究

目的：研究脑胶质瘤中p16基因启动子区甲基化情况及其临床意义。方法：用甲基化特异性PCR技术检测42例脑胶质瘤组织和癌旁正常脑组织中p16基因启动子甲基化,并分析该基因启动子甲基化与临床病理特征之间的关系。结果：脑胶质瘤组织中p16基因异常甲基化率（38.27%）显著高于癌旁正常脑组织中p16基因的异常甲基化率（8.8%,P=0.000）。发生甲基化的肿瘤组织或者正常脑组织中p16基因mRNA和蛋白表达显著降低。此外,p16基因异常甲基化和肿瘤病理分级有相关性（P=0.007）,而与患者性别、年龄及肿瘤类型等临床特征无关（P=0.669,0.869和0.944）。结论：p16基因启动子区CpG岛高甲基化与p16表达下调相关,推测p16启动子区CpG岛高甲基化是导致p16基因在脑胶质瘤中表达下调的重要因素,有望成为脑胶质瘤早期辅助诊断的分子标志物之一。     

EB病毒阳性和阴性胃癌中视网膜母细胞瘤基因甲基化状态及其表达

目的:了解EB病毒(Epstein-Barr virus,EBV)相关胃癌(EBVaGC)和阴性胃癌(EBVnGC)组织中视网膜母细胞瘤(Rb)基因甲基化状态及蛋白表达,探讨EBV感染与Rb基因甲基化的关系.方法:采用甲基化特异性PCR(MSP)对各种临床病理指标匹配的23例EBVaGC和25例EBVnGC组织及相应癌旁组织中Rb基因启动子区域的甲基化状态进行检测,并采用免疫组化技术检测两种胃癌组织中Rb蛋白的表达.结果:胃癌与相应癌旁组织中Rb基因启动子区的甲基化率分别为64.6%(31/48)和39.6%(19/48),差异有显著性(P<0.05);EBVaGC组织中Rb基因启动子区的甲基化率为82.6%(19/23),高于EBVnGC中的检出率(48.0%,12/25),差异有显著性(P<0.05);EBVaGC和EBVnGC组织中Rb蛋白的表达率分别为52.2%(12/23)和72.0%(18/25),差异无显著性(P□0.05);胃癌组织中Rb启动子基因甲基化与蛋白表达无明显负相关.结论:Rb异常甲基化在胃癌细胞中较常见,EBV可以诱导Rb基因甲基化,影响其基因表达而参与EBVaGC的发生.     

非小细胞性肺癌患者Runx3基因启动子区甲基化状态研究

目的:分析非小细胞性肺癌(NSCLC)中Runx3基因启动子区甲基化状态.方法:运用甲基化特异性PCR技术检测62例NSCLC组织和癌旁正常肺组织中Runx3基因启动子甲基化,并分析该基因启动子甲基化Runx3基因mRNA和蛋白表达的影响及其与临床特征之间的关系.结果:NSCLC组织中Runx3基因异常甲基化率(48.4%)显著高于癌旁正常肺组织中Runx3基因的异常甲基化率(17.7%,P＝0.000);发生完全或者不完全甲基化的NSCLC组织或者正常肺组织中Runx3基因mRNA和蛋白表达显著降低.Runx3基因启动子区高甲基化和肿瘤分化程度及临床分期有相关性(P＝0.041和0.009),而与NSCLC患者性别、年龄、有无吸烟史及肿瘤类型等临床特征无关(P=0.400,0.301,0.290和0.965).结论:Runx3基因启动子区异常甲基化是导致Runx3基因在NSCLC中表达下调的重要因素,有望成为NSCLC早期辅助诊断的分子标志物之一.     

结肠癌组织RASSF1A基因转录表达和启动子区甲基化研究

目的:研究Ras相关区域家族1A基因(ras association domain family 1A,RASSF1A)启动子区甲基化对结肠癌组织中该基因转录和表达的影响.方法:应用甲基化特异性PCR(Methylation-special PCR,MSP)、RT-PCR和Western blot方法检测30例结肠癌组织和癌旁组织中的RASSF1A基因启动子区甲基化状态、mRNA和蛋白表达水平.结果:①RASSF1A基因启动子区在结肠癌纽织和正常组织中的甲基化频率分别为57%(17/30)和20%(6/30),甲基化频率在两组具有统计学差异(p＜0.01),,结肠癌组织中RASSF1A基因启动子区甲基化频率显著高于癌旁正常组织(x2=8.531,p＜0.01);②结肠癌组织中RASSF1A基因mRNA和蛋白袁达均显著低于癌旁组织(癌组织和癌旁正常组织中mRNA相对表达量分别为0.2836±0.0493和0.5092±0.0433,P＜0.001;以上组织中蛋白相对表达量分别为0.3124±0.0472和0.5320±0.0440,P＜0.01);③在结肠癌组织中,甲基化组RASSF1A基因mRNA和蛋白表达明显低于非甲基化组(甲基化组和非甲基化组mRNA相对表达量分别为0.0686±0.0174和0.5511±0.0486,P＜0.0001;以上组中蛋白相对表达量分别为0.1219±0.0326和0.5614±0.0380,P＜0.0001).结论:结肠癌组织中RASSF1A基因启动子区甲基化明显增高,与该基因蛋白表达减少显著相关,这可能是导致结肠癌中RASSF1A抑癌基因失活的主要因为.     

卵巢上皮癌中ING4 基因启动子的甲基化状态及其临床意义

目的：探讨卵巢上皮癌中ING4 基因启动子的甲基化状态及其临床意义。方法：收集2005 年7 月至2012 年6 月哈尔滨医科 大学附属第一医院行全面分期手术并经病理检查确诊的150 例卵巢上皮癌组织标本,并以同期因子宫肌瘤或子宫腺肌症行子宫 全切除术或次全切除术并经病理检查确诊为正常卵巢组织的150 例标本作为对照组。采用甲基化特异性PCR（MSP）技术检测卵 巢上皮癌组织与正常卵巢组织中ING4 基因启动子的甲基化状态,蛋白印迹法检测ING4 蛋白的表达,并分析ING4 基因启动子 的甲基化状态与卵巢上皮癌临床病例特征的关系。结果：卵巢上皮癌组织中ING4 基因启动子的甲基化阳性率为42.7%（64/150）, 明显高于正常卵巢组织（4%,6/150）,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。ING4 基因启动子甲基化阳性的卵巢上皮癌组织中ING4蛋白 表达阴性或弱阳性;ING4 基因启动子甲基化阴性的卵巢上皮癌和正常卵巢组织中ING4 蛋白表达阳性;在64 例ING4 基因启动 子甲基化的卵巢上皮癌组织中,ING4 蛋白表达强度与ING4 基因启动子的甲基化程度呈负相关（r=-0.435,P<0.05）。卵巢上皮癌 组织中,ING4 基因甲基化的阳性率随着手术病理分期和组织学分级的增加而增加（P<0.05）;卵巢透明细胞癌（55.6%,10/18）和卵 巢子宫内膜样癌（59.3%,16/27）中ING4 基因甲基化的阳性率显著高于浆液性囊腺癌（33.9%,20/59）和粘液性囊腺癌（39.1%, 18/46）（P<0.05）;ING4基因启动子的甲基化状态与患者的年龄、有无腹水及淋巴结转移均无显著相关性（P>0.05）。结论：ING4 基 因启动子的甲基化可能促进了其在卵巢上皮癌组织中的表达失活,进而促进了卵巢上皮癌的生长和分化。     

CDH1 基因启动子甲基化与宫颈癌临床病理类型的关系

目的:探讨分析CDH1基因启动子甲基化与宫颈癌临床病理类型的关系。方法:选取2012年5月~2015年7月我院105例宫颈癌患者为宫颈癌组,同时选取60例正常宫颈组织为正常组,以甲基化特异性聚合酶链反应(MSP)检测CDH1基因启动子Cp G岛甲基化状态及高危型HPV DNA状态,分析CDH1基因甲基化状态与高危型HPV DNA状态及临床病理参数的关系。结果:宫颈癌组CDH1基因启动子甲基化阳性率为56.19%,明显高于正常组的6.67%,具有统计学差异(P0.05);宫颈癌组的高危型HPV DNA阳性率为84.76%,明显高于正常组的20.00%,具有统计学差异(P0.05);高危型HPV DNA与CDH1基因启动子甲基化的一致性分析结果具有统计学意义(P0.05);CDH1基因启动子甲基化率与患者的WHO组织分化程度分级、FIGO分期、组织病理学分型、肿瘤大小有关,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:宫颈癌CDH1基因启动子甲基化与WHO组织分化程度分级、FIGO分期、组织病理学分型、肿瘤大小具有关联,并与高危型HPV DNA阳性具有一致性,可以作为宫颈癌诊断和预后评估的参考指标。     

The global DNA methylation surrogate LINE-1 methylation is correlated with MGMT promoter methylation and is a better prognostic factor for glioma

Gliomas are the most frequently occurring primary brain tumor in the central nervous system of adults. Glioblastoma multiformes (GBMs, WHO grade 4) have a dismal prognosis despite the use of the alkylating agent, temozolomide (TMZ), and even low grade gliomas (LGGs, WHO grade 2) eventually transform to malignant secondary GBMs. Although GBM patients benefit from promoter hypermethylation of the O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) that is the main determinant of resistance to TMZ, recent studies suggested that MGMT promoter methylation is of prognostic as well as predictive significance for the efficacy of TMZ. Glioma-CpG island methylator phenotype (G-CIMP) in the global genome was shown to be a significant predictor of improved survival in patients with GBM. Collectively, we hypothesized that MGMT promoter methylation might reflect global DNA methylation. Additionally in LGGs, the significance of MGMT promoter methylation is still undetermined. In the current study, we aimed to determine the correlation between clinical, genetic, and epigenetic profiles including LINE-1 and different cancer-related genes and the clinical outcome in newly diagnosed 57 LGG and 54 GBM patients. Here, we demonstrated that (1) IDH1/2 mutation is closely correlated with MGMT promoter methylation and 1p/19q codeletion in LGGs, (2) LINE-1 methylation levels in primary and secondary GBMs are lower than those in LGGs and normal brain tissues, (3) LINE-1 methylation is proportional to MGMT promoter methylation in gliomas, and (4) higher LINE-1 methylation is a favorable prognostic factor in primary GBMs, even compared to MGMT promoter methylation. As a global DNA methylation marker, LINE-1 may be a promising marker in gliomas.     

O(6)-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase in glioma therapy: Promise and problems

Gliomas are the most frequent adult primary brain tumor, and are invariably fatal. The most common diagnosis glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) afflicts 12,500 new patients in the U.S. annually, and has a median survival of approximately one year when treated with the current standard of care. Alkylating agents have long been central in the chemotherapy of GBM and other gliomas. The DNA repair protein O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT), the principal human activity that removes cytotoxic O(6)-alkylguanine adducts from DNA, promotes resistance to anti-glioma alkylators, including temozolomide and BCNU, in GBM cell lines and xenografts. Moreover, MGMT expression assessed by immunohistochemistry, biochemical activity or promoter CpG methylation status is associated with the response of GBM to alkylator-based therapies, providing evidence that MGMT promotes clinical resistance to alkylating agents. These observations suggest a role for MGMT in directing adjuvant therapy of GBM and other gliomas. Promoter methylation status is the most clinically tractable measure of MGMT, and there is considerable enthusiasm for exploring its utility as a marker to assign therapy to individual patients. Here, we provide an overview of the biochemical, genetic and biological characteristics of MGMT as they relate to glioma therapy. We consider current methods to assess MGMT expression and discuss their utility as predictors of treatment response. Particular emphasis is given to promoter methylation status and the methodological and conceptual impediments that limit its use to direct treatment. We conclude by considering approaches that may improve the utility of MGMT methylation status in planning optimal therapies tailored to individual patients.     

O-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase in glioma therapy: Promise and problems

Gliomas are the most frequent adult primary brain tumor, and are invariably fatal. The most common diagnosis glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) afflicts 12,500 new patients in the U.S. annually, and has a median survival of approximately one year when treated with the current standard of care. Alkylating agents have long been central in the chemotherapy of GBM and other gliomas. The DNA repair protein O⁶-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT), the principal human activity that removes cytotoxic O⁶-alkylguanine adducts from DNA, promotes resistance to anti-glioma alkylators, including temozolomide and BCNU, in GBM cell lines and xenografts. Moreover, MGMT expression assessed by immunohistochemistry, biochemical activity or promoter CpG methylation status is associated with the response of GBM to alkylator-based therapies, providing evidence that MGMT promotes clinical resistance to alkylating agents. These observations suggest a role for MGMT in directing adjuvant therapy of GBM and other gliomas. Promoter methylation status is the most clinically tractable measure of MGMT, and there is considerable enthusiasm for exploring its utility as a marker to assign therapy to individual patients. Here, we provide an overview of the biochemical, genetic and biological characteristics of MGMT as they relate to glioma therapy. We consider current methods to assess MGMT expression and discuss their utility as predictors of treatment response. Particular emphasis is given to promoter methylation status and the methodological and conceptual impediments that limit its use to direct treatment. We conclude by considering approaches that may improve the utility of MGMT methylation status in planning optimal therapies tailored to individual patients.     

Frequent intra-tumoural heterogeneity of promoter hypermethylation in malignant melanoma

To investigate intra-tumoural coexistence and heterogeneity of aberrant promoter hypermethylation of different tumour suppressor genes in melanoma, we analyzed the intra-tumoural distribution of promoter methylation of RASSF1A, p16, DAPK, MGMT, and Rb in 339 assays of 34 tumours (15 melanoma primaries, 19 metastases) by methylation-specific PCR, correlation to histopathology and RASSF1A expression. We detected promoter hypermethylation of at least one gene in 74% of tumours (30%, 52%, 33%, 20%, and 40% for RASSF1A, p16, DAPK, MGMT and Rb, respectively). 70% of the cases exhibited an inhomogeneous methylation pattern (17%, 45%, 33%, 20%, and 40% for RASSF1A, p16, DAPK, MGMT and Rb, respectively). Samples from the core of the tumours represented the methylation state of the whole tumours more accurately than the periphery. Local intra-tumoural correlation was found between the promoter hypermethylation state of p16 and Rb or p16 and DAPK, or epitheloid tumour cell type and RASSF1A or p16 methylation. Mitosis rate and sex was correlated with methylation of RASSF1A. Histological results confirmed that promoter hypermethylation of RASSF1A led to aberrant expression patterns. We conclude that intra-tumoural inhomogeneity of promoter hypermethylation is frequent in melanoma and this supports the hypothesis of clonal instability during progression of melanomas. In prognosis studies, missing the intra-tumoural sample representativeness may result in a reduction of the sensitivities or specificities.