Diagnostic criteria for blepharospasm: A multicenter international study

BackgroundThere are no widely accepted criteria to aid the physician in diagnosing BSP.ObjectiveTo validate recently proposed diagnostic criteria for blepharospasm in a larger and geographically diverse population and to develop a screening system for blepharospasm.MethodsVideo-recordings from 211 blepharospasm patients and 166 healthy/disease controls were examined by 8 raters. Agreement for presence of orbicularis oculi spasms, sensory trick, and increased blinking was measured by k statistics. Inability to voluntarily suppress the spasms was asked by the examiner but not captured in the video. Patients/controls were also requested to fill a self-administered questionnaire addressing relevant blepharospasm clinical aspects. The diagnosis at each site was the gold standard for sensitivity/specificity.ResultsAll the study items yielded satisfactory inter/intra-observer agreement. Combination of items rather than each item alone reached satisfactory sensitivity/specificity. The combined algorithm started with recognition of spasms followed by sensory trick. In the absence of a sensory trick, including “increased blinking” or “inability to voluntarily suppress the spasms” or both items yielded 88–92% sensitivity and 79–83% specificity. No single question of the questionnaire yielded high sensitivity/specificity. Serial application of the questionnaire to our blepharospasm and control subjects and subsequent clinical examination of subjects screening positive by the validated diagnostic algorithms yielded 78–81% sensitivity and 83–91% specificity.ConclusionThese results support the use of proposed diagnostic criteria in multi-ethnic, multi-center cohorts. We also propose a case-finding procedure to screen blepharospasm in a given population with less effort than would be required by examination of all subjects.     

Validity of the CAGE questionnaire in hospital.

OBJECTIVE: The CAGE questionnaire is considered a useful screening and case-finding tool for alcohol use disorders in clinical populations. Our objectives were to validate the French version of the CAGE against DSM-IV criteria and to assess performance of each item of the scale. METHOD: Data were extracted from a hospital morbidity study conducted in central France. It concerned 5452 patients-48.5% men-in short and medium-stay units. Patients answered the CAGE questionnaire as a past-year assessment. The alcohol use disorders were diagnosed by the physicians using DSM-IV alcohol abuse or dependency criteria. RESULTS: The CAGE questionnaire for a cut-off of 2 had a sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 94%. The CAGE test was more sensitive for patients diagnosed as alcohol-dependent than for alcohol abusers (61% vs. 84%) with the same specificity (94%). These values are close to those for the English-language CAGE. The first three items (CAG) were very similar, with sensitivity 70% and specificity 94%. The eye-opening question (E) differentiated sharply between abuse and dependency, with sensitivities of 18% and 46%, respectively. A questionnaire comprising only the CAG questions of the CAGE had properties similar to the full questionnaire. CONCLUSION: CAGE is a good screening tool for alcohol abuse or alcohol dependency. Given the frequent-and insufficiently diagnosed-alcohol problems among inpatients, CAGE is indicated as a first-line tool for screening for the most severe alcohol use disorders in hospital. It should ideally be used systematically. A positive reply to any of the first three items should alert the clinician and prompt further investigation.     

A clinical evaluation of the Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination in a general psychiatric inpatient population.

The Neurobehavioral Cognitive Status Examination (NCSE) is a structured test of cognitive functioning. The NCSE assesses a broader range of cognitive functioning than the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), but remains brief enough to be administered at the bedside in clinical settings. The purpose of this study was to assess the sensitivity, specificity, predictive value and reliability of the NCSE as a clinical case-finding instrument for DSM-III-R defined organic mental disorders in psychiatric inpatients. Validity was assessed by comparing the results of the test (interpreted as "pass" or "fail") to a blind clinical assessment by an experienced psychiatrist. The NCSE was found to have superior sensitivity to the MMSE (83% versus 43%), but inferior specificity (47% versus 97%). The low specificity resulted in a positive predictive value of only 24%. The NCSE had good test-retest reliability (Kappa = .69), but the inter-rater reliability was not as good (Kappa = 0.57). The NCSE was too non-specific to be used as a case-finding instrument for organic mental disorders. In conclusion, although clinicians may find the NCSE to be a valuable instrument for the assessment of cognitive function, it cannot be used as a screening or case-finding instrument for organic disorders among psychiatric inpatients.     

Identifying depression in primary care: a literature synthesis of case-finding instruments

We evaluated the usefulness of case-finding instruments for identifying patients with major depression or dysthymia in primary care settings using English language literature from Medline, a specialized trials registry and bibliographies of selected papers. Studies were done in primary care settings with unselected patients and compared case-finding instruments with accepted diagnostic criterion standards for major depression were selected. A total of 16 case-finding instruments were assessed in 38 studies. More than 32,000 patients received screening with a case-finding instrument; approximately 12,900 of these received criterion standard assessment. Case-finding instruments ranged in length from 1 to 30 questions. Average administration times ranged from less than 2 min to 6 min. Median sensitivity for major depression was 85% (range 50% to 97%); median specificity was 74% (range 51% to 98%). No significant differences between instruments were found. However for individual instruments, estimates of sensitivity and specificity varied significantly between studies. For the combined diagnoses of major depression or dysthymia, overall sensitivity was 79% (CI, 74% to 83%) and overall specificity 75% (CI, 70% to 81%). Stratified analyses showed no significant effects on overall instrument performance for study methodology, criterion standard choice, or patient characteristics. We found that multiple instruments with reasonable operating characteristics are available to help primary care clinicians identify patients with major depression. Because operating characteristics of these instruments are similar, selection of a particular instrument should depend on issues such as feasibility, administration and scoring times, and the instruments' ability to serve additional purposes, such as monitoring severity or response to therapy.     

Phenotypic overlap in familial and sporadic primary adult-onset extracranial dystonia

We recently demonstrated that familial and sporadic blepharospasms share several phenotypic features (including age of dystonia onset, sex, and tendency to spread) believed to reflect the etiology of a blepharospasm. To investigate whether familial and sporadic forms of primary adult-onset dystonia other than the blepharospasm also share phenotypic features, we studied the families of 98 probands with primary adult-onset dystonia other than blepharospasms using a validated two-step procedure (questionnaire and clinical examination) that yields 95?% sensitivity and 100?% specificity when used to identify dystonia among relatives. The 98 probands provided a population of 402 living first-degree relatives aged 20?years or more, 336 of whom (83?%, 111 parents, 152 siblings, and 73 children) were screened for dystonia. The screening procedure identified 26 affected relatives (five parents, 16 siblings, and five children; 11 men/15 women; age at dystonia onset, 51?±?11.7?years) from 24/98 families (25?%). No causes of secondary dystonia were found in the relatives who suffered from various forms of dystonia. When familial and sporadic patients were compared, no significant differences emerged in age, education, family size, sex distribution, age at dystonia onset, or tendency to spread. The phenotypic overlap we observed between the study groups suggests that familial and sporadic patients with primary adult-onset dystonia other than blepharospasm probably share a common etiological background.     

Two-stage community-based screening model for estimating prevalence of diabetic polyneuropathy (KCIS no. 6)

The aim of this study was to apply a calibrated two-stage community-based design to estimate the prevalence of diabetic distal sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DPN) in Taiwan. Type 2 diabetics were identified from a population-based screening program in Keelung, Taiwan. Administration of the Neurological Symptom Score (NSS) questionnaire identified 210 DPN-positive cases of the 587 diabetic subjects tested. The accuracy of this NSS screening was tested with sensitive electrophysiological DPN diagnosis. A smaller validation study was also conducted to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of the NSS questionnaire. In the validation study, the overall prevalence rate for DPN among type 2 diabetics was 26.79%. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive values were 73.33, 30.49, 24.72 and 75.76%, respectively. The estimates of sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive values were 75.00, 33.33 and 42.86% for old cases of diabetes, and 72.22, 29.69 and 22.41% for newly diagnosed cases. The range of prevalence rate in the main study was adjusted to 28.46-36.30% after calibration for sensitivity and specificity with the validation study data. A two-stage community-based screening model with calibration of prevalence rate was developed and enabled a cost-effective DPN prevalence rate estimate in a study with a large number of subjects.     

Validity of a modified Parkinson's disease screening questionnaire in India: effects of literacy of participants and medical training of screeners and implications for screening efforts in developing countries.

The prevalence of Parkinson's disease (PD) is low among Indians, except in the Parsis. Data for Indians come from studies using different screening tools and criteria to detect PD. An epidemiological study in India, which has nearly a billion people, more than 18 spoken languages, and varying levels of literacy, requires development and validation of a screening tool for PD. The objectives of this study are to (1) validate a modified version of a widely used screening questionnaire for PD to suit the needs of the Indian population; (2) compare the use of a nonmedical assistant (NMA) with the use of a medical person during screening; and (3) compare the effect of literacy of participants on the validity of the screening tool. The validity of the questionnaire was tested on 125 participants from a home for the elderly. NMAs of similar background and medical personnel administered the modified screening questionnaire. A movement disorder neurologist blind to the responses on the questionnaire, examined participants independently and diagnosed if participants had PD. The questionnaire was validated in the movement disorders clinic, on known PD patients and their family members without PD. In the movement disorders clinic, sensitivity and specificity of the questionnaire were 100% and 89%, respectively. Fifty-seven participants were included for analysis. The questionnaire had a higher sensitivity when NMAs (75%) rather than the medical personnel (61%) administered it, and its specificity was higher with the medical personnel (61%) than with NMAs (55% and 25%). The questionnaire had a higher specificity in literates than illiterates, whereas sensitivity varied considerably. The modified questionnaire translated in a local Indian language had reasonable sensitivity and can be used to screen individuals for PD in epidemiological studies in India. This questionnaire can be administered by NMAs to screen PD and this strategy would reduce manpower costs. Literacy may influence epidemiological estimates when screening PD.     

Validity of family history data on primary adult-onset dystonia

BACKGROUND: To our knowledge, no study has assessed the validity of family history data provided by probands with adult-onset dystonia. OBJECTIVE: To measure the sensitivity and specificity of interviewing patients with primary adult-onset dystonia as a method for obtaining information on dystonia in first-degree relatives. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy probands with primary adult-onset dystonia were asked to identify first-degree relatives who had dystonia. Available relatives were then directly examined by a trained neurologist. The validity of the probands' reports was tested against the neurologists' diagnoses. RESULTS: Among 300 first-degree relatives who were examined, 26 received a diagnosis of dystonia. Only 7 of the 26 were identified by the probands' reports. Among the 274 relatives free of dystonia, the probands reported 5 as having dystonia. The probands' reports therefore yielded a sensitivity of 27.0% and a specificity of 98.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Because the family history method yields low sensitivity and incurs a risk of misclassification, it is of limited use in family studies of adult-onset dystonia. The only valid means of ascertaining dystonia among relatives remains neurological examination of at-risk subjects.     

Screening for cognitive deficits in Parkinson's disease with the Parkinson neuropsychometric dementia assessment (PANDA) instrument

Cognitive and affective dysfunctions are frequent but often neglected symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD). We developed the screening tool Parkinson neuropsychometric dementia assessment (PANDA) with five cognitive tasks and a short depression questionnaire. Healthy subjects and patients without cognitive impairment (PD), mild cognitive disorder (PD-MCD), or dementia (PDD) were examined. The cognition part had a specificity of 91% and a sensitivity of 90% for PDD and 77% for PDD plus PD-MCD patients. The mood questionnaire also had high sensitivity and specificity. We conclude that the PANDA is an economical, easy-to-use and sensitive tool to detect neuropsychological dysfunctions in PD patients in clinical practice.     

The Hopkins Symptom Checklist-25 in screening DSM-III-R axis-I disorders

Simple screening questionnaires for major psychiatric disorders are needed for epidemiological research and clinical work. We describe the characteristics of the Hopkins Symptom Checklist-25 (HSCL-25) as a screening instrument in a two-phase epidemiological survey using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID) as a diagnostic tool. The material consisted of 1609 subjects aged 31 years who were asked to participate in a health survey. The invitation included the HSCL-25 questionnaire. All "screen-positive" (HSCL-25 mean>/=1.55) subjects and every tenth "screen-negative" subject were invited to participate in the SCID interview. The sensitivity of the HSCL-25 for any present DSM-III-R axis-I psychiatric disorder was 48%. The specificity was 87%. The sensitivity of cases with comorbid psychiatric disorders was 100%. The HSCL-25 is a moderate instrument for screening with present axis-I DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders in a young adult population. It can be recommended for screening of psychiatric disorders.     

Field validation of a method for population screening of parkinsonism.

We sought to validate an instrument and two application procedures for screening for prevalence of parkinsonism in conjunction with a door-to-door survey in Cantalejo, Spain. Residents in Cantalejo aged 40 years or older were assigned to three groups specifically designed to optimise case-finding and cost/efficiency. A nine-item questionnaire aimed at identifying parkinsonism-related symptoms was administered and collected door-to-door by laymen and repeated by specialists at a medical facility before neurological examination. Diagnoses were then established and confirmed after a 3-year follow-up. Different indices for and concordance of answers were studied for both applications in groups of 25 individuals with parkinsonism. The scoring procedure was updated using the prevalence community sample of parkinsonism. Whereas the application administered by laymen showed, using the same cut-off scores, a higher sensitivity for parkinsonism than that administered by trained personnel, it yielded a lower positive predictive value for parkinsonism diagnosed during the study, i.e., at a 30-point cut-off (96% vs. 80% and 15% vs. 76%, respectively). Concordance was > or =64% with kappa >or=0.316 and P 相似文献   

Simple clinical tests may predict severe oropharyngeal dysphagia in Parkinson's disease.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if simple screening tests can predict severe oropharyngeal dysphagia in subjects with Parkinson's disease. METHODOLOGY: Forty-five subjects (26 females) of average age 75 (range: 65-94) who were classified as Modified Hoehn and Yahr stages 2 to 5 were enrolled. The presence of oropharyngeal dysphagia was assessed by a symptom questionnaire, 50 ml water swallowing test and videofluroscopic swallowing study. RESULTS: Six of the subjects had severe oropharyngeal dysphagia in videofluroscopic swallowing study. Subsequent multivariate analysis showed that 3 factors could independently predict severe oropharyngeal dysphagia. These included higher Modified Hoehn and Yahr stage (P = 0.042), low Body mass index (P = 0.014), and increased difficulty in keeping food or drink in the mouth (P = 0.047). The regression model had a positive predictive power of 96% (sensitivity: 83.3%, specificity: 97.4%). CONCLUSION: A combination of 3 simple clinical parameters may be useful for screening for severe oropharyngeal dysphagia as shown radiologically in subjects with Parkinson's disease.     

Reliability and validity of two self-administered questionnaires for screening restless legs syndrome in population-based studies

BackgroundA reliable and valid questionnaire for screening restless legs syndrome (RLS) is essential for determining accurate estimates of disease frequency. In a 2002 NIH-sponsored workshop, experts suggested three mandatory questions for identifying RLS in epidemiologic studies. We evaluated the reliability and validity of this RLS-NIH questionnaire in a community-based sample and concurrently developed and evaluated the utility of an expanded screening questionnaire, the RLS-EXP.MethodsThe study was conducted at Kaiser Permanente of Northern California and the Stanford University Sleep Clinic. We evaluated test–retest reliability in a random sample of subjects with prior physician-assigned RLS (n = 87), subjects with conditions frequently misclassified as RLS (n = 31), and healthy subjects (n = 9). Validity of both instruments was evaluated in a random sample of 32 subjects, and in-person examination by two RLS specialists was used as the gold standard.ResultsFor the first three RLS-NIH questions, the kappa statistic for test–retest reliability ranged from 0.5 to 1.0, and sensitivity and specificity was 86% and 45%, respectively. For the subset of five questions on RLS-EXP that encompassed cardinal features for diagnosing RLS, kappas were 0.4–0.8, and sensitivity and specificity were 81% and 73%, respectively.ConclusionsSensitivity of RLS-NIH is good; however, the specificity of the instrument is poor when examined in a sample that over-represents subjects with conditions that are commonly misclassified as RLS. Specificity can be improved by including separate questions on cardinal features, as used in the RLS-EXP, and by including a few questions that identify RLS mimics, thereby reducing false positives.     

Use of the Beck Depression Inventory for Primary Care to screen for major depression disorders

To ascertain how effective the Beck Depression Inventory for Primary Care (BDI-PC) was in screening for DSM-IV major depression disorders (MDD) in outpatients who were scheduled for routine office visits with physicians specializing in internal medicine, the BDI-PC was administered to 60 male and 60 female outpatients. The internal consistency of the BDI-PC was high (alpha 0.85), and the Mood Module from the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders was used to diagnose MDD. The BDI-PC scores were not significantly correlated with sex, age, ethnicity, or total number of medical diagnoses. A BDI-PC cutoff score of 4 and above yielded 98% maximum clinical efficiency with 97% (95% CI 82%-99%) sensitivity and 99% (95% CI 94%-99%) specificity rates, respectively, for identifying patients with and without MDD. The BDI-PC is discussed as an effective case-finding instrument for screening primary care patients for MDD.     

The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: A diagnostic meta-analysis of case-finding ability

Objective

To quantify the accuracy of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) as a case-finding instrument for anxiety and depressive disorders.

Method

MEDLINE, PSYCHINFO, EMBASE, CINAHL, BNI, and AMED were searched from January 1983 to June 2006. Studies were included that administered the HADS, used a standardized psychiatric interview to establish a diagnosis of anxiety or depression, and provided sufficient data on sensitivity and specificity (N=41). Summary sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratios were calculated for each study. Random effects meta-analytic pooling across studies at the recommended clinical (7/8) and research (10/11) cutoff points was undertaken and summary receiver operating characteristic curves constructed.

Results

For major depressive disorders, a cut point of ≥8 gave a sensitivity of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.73-0.89) and a specificity of 0.74 (95% CI, 0.60-0.84) and a cut point ≥11 gave a sensitivity of 0.56 (95% CI, 0.40-0.71) and a specificity of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.79-0.97).

Conclusions

Many studies have shown that the HADS is a useful screening tool to identify emotional distress in nonpsychiatric patients. However, it does not appear to be superior to other screening instruments in terms of identifying specific mental disorders in physical health settings.     

Transcultural validity of a structured diagnostic interview to screen for major depression and posttraumatic stress disorder among refugees

Refugees and asylum seekers have a high risk of developing mental health problems and appropriate screening in people from diverse origins remains a challenge. The aim of this study was to validate a structured diagnostic interview, adapted from the Major Depressive Episode (MDE) and Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) sections of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview, to detect these disorders among newly arrived asylum seekers. The adapted questionnaire was administered by nurses in a primary care context and its performance was judged against the expert opinion of a mental health specialist. One hundred one subjects were included in the study (mean age: 30; origin: Africa 58%, Europe: 37%, Asia: 5%). MDE and PTSD were diagnosed among 33% and 30% of them respectively. The questionnaire demonstrated moderate sensitivity (MDE: 79%; PTSD: 69%), but high specificity (MDE: 95%; PTSD: 94%). These characteristics remained stable despite cultural differences and use of interpreters. This instrument could be used for systematic screening of MDE and PTSD in refugees from various origins.     

Predicting obstructive sleep apnea using the STOP-Bang questionnaire in the general population

ObjectiveThe STOP-Bang questionnaire was developed as a quick and simple screening tool for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in preoperative clinics. We aimed to evaluate the validity of the STOP-Bang questionnaire to predict moderate-to-severe and severe OSA in the general population.MethodsA sample of 242 subjects selected from a population-based cohort in Singapore completed home-based sleep testing with a type 3 monitor. Subjects were asked to complete the STOP questionnaire while body mass index (BMI), age, neck circumference, and sex were recorded. A score of ≥3 on the questionnaire indicated high risk of OSA.ResultsA total of 68 subjects (28.1%) and 26 subjects (10.7%) had an apnea−hypopnea index (AHI) of ≥15 and ≥30 events per hour, respectively. Of the subjects, 89 (36.8%) were classified as high risk based on the questionnaire. The sensitivity of a STOP-Bang score of ≥3 was 66.2% to detect AHI ≥15 and 69.2% to detect AHI ≥30. The specificities were 74.7% and 67.1%, respectively. The negative predictive values were 85% for moderate-to-severe OSA and 94.8% for severe OSA. The corresponding positive predictive values were 50.6% and 20.2%, respectively. Using BMI cutoffs of 30 and 27.5 for Asians compared to the original cutoff of 35 did not improve the questionnaire performance significantly.ConclusionThe STOP-Bang questionnaire can be used as a screening tool in the general population in view of its moderate sensitivity and high negative predictive value for subjects with moderate-to-severe and severe OSA. The cutoff of BMI >35 can be used in Asians, as lower BMI cutoffs did not improve questionnaire performance.     

Validation of the Hodkinson abbreviated mental test as a screening instrument for dementia in an Italian population.

We investigated the accuracy of the Hodkinson abbreviated mental test (AMT) as a screening instrument for dementia in an Italian population. The AMT was administered by nonmedical personnel to 124 subjects > 59 years old. Each subject independently underwent a clinical evaluation for dementia (DSM-III criteria), and scores on the AMT were compared to corresponding clinical diagnoses (standard for comparison). Twenty of the 124 subjects were found to be affected by dementia upon clinical investigation. Although a score of 6 on the AMT showed the best combination of sensitivity (90%) and specificity (89%), only a score of 7 yielded 100% sensitivity (71% specificity). Specificity was higher in men, younger, and more educated subjects.     

A rapid method for mass screening for parkinsonism

Epidemiology studies of parkinsonism employ a variety of techniques for unbiased sampling of populations. No current method permits mass screening of all subjects in a population for parkinsonism by movement disorders specialists. We developed and piloted a new approach to facilitate accurate and efficient screening of large populations for diagnosis of parkinsonism and provide data on sensitivity and specificity. We evaluated 2081 welders referred for medical-legal screening. Subjects were video taped using a standardized protocol, and videos were rated on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale motor subsection 3 (UPDRS3). A "video rater" viewed video tapes and entered ratings through a web-based database. An "in-person" examiner performed a UPDRS3 examination in a randomly selected subgroup of 48 workers drawn from the 2081. We developed quantitative diagnostic criteria for parkinsonism that established minimum diagnostic thresholds based upon UPDRS3 scores and compared these criteria with diagnosis by an in-person examiner. Specificity of these criteria compared to in-person examination was 91-100% but sensitivity was 56%. A threshold UPDRS3 score greater than nine provided 100% sensitivity and 81% specificity. Liberal criteria identified 266 (13.1%) subjects with probable parkinsonism and 220 (10.8%) subjects with definite parkinsonism. Conservative criteria identified 260 (12.8%) with probable parkinsonism and 122 (6%) with definite parkinsonism. Our screening method permits rapid assessment of parkinsonian signs. An absolute UPDRS3 score greater than nine provided the best combination of sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of parkinsonism, while quantitative exam-based criteria for cardinal parkinsonian signs maximized specificity. Parkinsonism as diagnosed by our criteria was common in this group of welders.     

Validation of the Innsbruck REM sleep behavior disorder inventory

A diagnosis of definite REM sleep behavior disorder requires both a positive history for REM sleep behavior disorder and polysomnographic demonstration of REM sleep without atonia. To improve and facilitate screening for REM sleep behavior disorder, there is a need for simple clinical tools with sufficient sensitivity and specificity for the identification of subjects with probable REM sleep behavior disorder. We developed a short REM sleep behavior disorder screening questionnaire with 7 REM sleep behavior disorder– and 2 non‐REM sleep behavior disorder–specific control items and performed a validation study in 70 REM sleep behavior disorder subjects and 140 sleep disorder controls. Response patterns to all 7 REM sleep behavior disorder–specific items differed between REM sleep behavior disorder and non‐REM sleep behavior disorder patients (all P < 0.05), whereas the 2 non‐REM sleep behavior disorder–specific control items did not differentiate between REM sleep behavior disorder and non‐REM sleep behavior disorder (all P > .05). In 5 of the 7 REM sleep behavior disorder–specific items, AUC was greater than 0.700. These 5 items were included in the Innsbruck REM sleep behavior disorder inventory. In this questionnaire, a cutoff of 0.25 (number of positive symptoms divided by number of answered questions) had a sensitivity of 0.914 and a specificity of 0.857 for both idiopathic and Parkinson's‐related REM sleep behavior disorder (AUC, 0.886). The Innsbruck REM sleep behavior disorder inventory is a promising, easy‐to‐use, short screening tool for REM sleep behavior disorder with excellent sensitivity and specificity for both idiopathic and Parkinson's‐related REM sleep behavior disorder. © 2012 Movement Disorder Society