Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma ligands inhibit cell growth and induce apoptosis in human liver cancer BEL-7402 cells

AIM: To investigate the characteristics of PPAR gamma ligands induced apoptosis in liver cancer cells.METHODS: The effects of ligands for each of the PPAR gamma ligands on DNA synthesis and cell viability were examined in BEL-7402 liver cancer cells. Apoptosis was characterized by Hochest33258 staining, DNA fragmentation,TUNEL and EHSA, and cell cyde kinetics by FACS. Modulation of apoptosis related caspases expression by PPAR gamma ligands was examined by Western blot.RESULTS: PPARgamma ligands, 15-deoxy^-12,14-prostaglandin J2 (I5d-PGJ2) and troglitazone (TGZ), suppressed DNA synthesis of BEL-7402 cells. Both 15d-PG12 and TGZ induced BEL-7402 cell death in a dose dependent manner, which was associated with an increase in fragmented DNA and TUNEL-positive cells. At concentrations of 10 and 30μM,15d-PGJ2 or troglitazone increased the proportion of cells with Go/G1 phase DNA content and decreased those with S phase DNA content. There was no significant change in the proportion of cells with G2/M DNA content. The activities of Caspases-3, -6, -7 and -9 were increased by 15d-PGJ2 and TGZ treatment, while the activity of Caspase 8 had not significantly changed.CONCLUSION: The present results suggest the potential usefulness of PPAR gamma ligands for chemopreventJon and treatment of liver cancers.     

Intracellular regulation of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand-induced apoptosis in human multiple myeloma cells

Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL, Apo2 ligand) effectively kills multiple myeloma (MM) cells in vitro irrespective of refractoriness to dexamethasone and chemotherapy. Because clinical trials with this anticancer agent are expected shortly, we investigated the signaling pathway of TRAIL-induced apoptosis in MM. We detected rapid cleavage of caspases-8, -9, -3, and -6, as well as the caspase substrates poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) and DNA fragmentation factor-45 (DFF45), but not caspase-10, upon TRAIL treatment in sensitive MM cells, pointing to caspase-8 as the apical caspase of TRAIL signaling in MM cells. These phenomena were not observed or were significantly delayed in TRAIL-resistant MM cells, suggesting that resistance may arise from inhibition at the level of caspase-8 activation. Higher levels of expression for various apoptosis inhibitors, including FLICE-inhibitory protein (FLIP), and lower procaspase-8 levels were present in TRAIL-resistant cells and sensitivity was restored by the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide (CHX) and the protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor bisindolylmaleimide (BIM), which both lowered FLIP and cellular inhibitor of apoptosis protein-2 (cIAP-2) protein levels. Forced expression of procaspase-8 or FLIP antisense oligonucleotides also sensitized TRAIL-resistant cells to TRAIL. Moreover, the cell permeable nuclear factor (NF)-kappaB inhibitor SN50, which sensitizes TRAIL-resistant cells to TRAIL, also inhibited cIAP2 protein expression. Finally, CHX, BIM, and SN50 facilitated the cleavage and activation of procaspase-8 in TRAIL-resistant cells, confirming that inhibition of TRAIL-induced apoptosis occurs at this level and that these agents sensitize MM cells by relieving this block. Our data set a framework for the clinical use of approaches that sensitize MM cells to TRAIL by agents that inhibit FLIP and cIAP-2 expression or augment caspase-8 activity.     

过氧化物酶体增殖物活化受体γ配体15d-PGJ2对肝星状细胞增殖活化的影响

目的观察过氧化物酶体增殖物活化受体γ(PPARγ)的天然配体15d-PGJ2对HSC增殖及活化的影响,以探讨PPARγ在HSC活化过程中的作用。方法采用MTT法和RT-PCR方法观察5μmol/L及10μmol/L 15d-PGJ2对体外培养的HSC自发活化及血小板衍生生长因子(PDGF)引起的HSC增殖及活化的影响。结果以5μmol/L 15d-PGJ2处理原代HSC 3 d后,可明显抑制HSC活化标志物α-平滑肌肌动蛋白的表达,而PPARγ的表达较未处理组明显增高(0.64±0.03对比0.09±0.01,t=36.0517,P<0.01);15d-PGJ2可剂量依赖性地抑制PDGF引起的HSC增殖;经5μmol/L和10μmol/L 15d-PGJ2预处理后再用PDGF干预,则PPARγ的表达较单用PDGF干预组明显增高(分别为0.03±0.02对比0.60±0.03,t=42.6616,P<0.01;以及0.03±0.02对比0.69±0.04,t=33.83,P<0.01),而HSC的活化指标α-平滑肌肌动蛋白、α1(I)型胶原及单核细胞趋化蛋白-1的表达则受抑制。结论激活PPARγ可调控HSC的促纤维化和促炎症作用,促进PPARγ的表达可能成为抗肝纤维化的新手段。     

Sensitivity of adult T-cell leukaemia lymphoma cells to tumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand

Tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) induces apoptosis in many transformed cells, but not in normal cells, and hence TRAIL has recently emerged as a novel anti-cancer agent. Adult T-cell leukaemia lymphoma (ATLL) is a neoplasm of T-lymphocyte origin aetiologically associated with human T-lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-I), and is resistant to standard anti-cancer therapy. We thus characterized the sensitivity of ATLL cells to TRAIL in this study. Although most primary ATLL cells and cell lines expressed TRAIL death receptors on their surface, they showed only restricted sensitivity to TRAIL. Among the 10 ATLL cell lines examined, one was sensitive, but two had insufficient death-receptor expression, two had an unknown resistant mechanism with abrogation of the death signal upstream of caspase-8, and the remaining five showed attenuation of the signal in both extrinsic and intrinsic pathways by X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis and Bcl-2/Bcl-xL respectively. Furthermore, the level of HTLV-I tax expression was significantly correlated to TRAIL resistance. Interestingly, ATLL cells themselves expressed TRAIL on the cell surface. Constitutive production of TRAIL may offer resistance, thus allowing the development of TRAIL-resistant ATLL cells. Consequently, the resistant mechanism in ATLL cells against TRAIL was assigned to multiple factors and was not explained by a definitive single agent.     

Dihydroflavonol BB-1, an extract of natural plant Blumea balsamifera, abrogates TRAIL resistance in leukemia cells

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) induces apoptosis in many transformed cells but not in normal cells and, hence, has emerged as a novel anticancer agent. Previously, we showed that although most adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATLL) cells express the TRAIL death receptor DR4 (TRAIL-R1) or DR5 (TRAIL-R2), they are resistant to TRAIL. Thus, in this study, we tried to find natural products that can overcome TRAIL resistance. Among more than 150 materials screened, a dihydroflavonol that was extracted from Blumea balsamifera (BB-1) exhibited the most striking synergism with TRAIL. Treatment of the TRAIL-resistant ATLL cell line KOB, with a combination of BB-1 and TRAIL, resulted in apparent apoptosis that was not observed on treatment with either agent alone. Furthermore, pretreatment with BB-1 followed by TRAIL further augmented the synergism. BB-1 increased the level of TRAIL-R2 promoter activity and surface protein expression in a p53-independent manner. TRAIL-R2 siRNA inhibited the synergism, indicating that sensitization was caused by the increase of TRAIL-R2 expression. More interestingly, similar effects were observed in other leukemia cell lines by exactly the same mechanisms. These results suggest that combined treatment with BB-1 and TRAIL may be a new strategy for cancer therapy.     

肿瘤坏死因子相关凋亡诱导配体对肝癌耐药细胞株阿霉素化疗敏感性的影响

目的 研究肿瘤坏死因子相关凋亡诱导配体(TRAIL)联合阿霉素(ADM)处理肝癌耐药细胞株HePG2／ADM对化疗敏感性的影响。方法 通过培养液中ADM的浓度梯度增加法长期筛选培养，建立肝癌HepG2／ADM耐药细胞株，荧光定量PCR检测多药耐药(MDR)1的表达，TRAIL联合化疗药物ADM处理HePG2／ADM，MTT比色法检测细胞增殖，细胞凋亡采用流式细胞仪和TUNEL法检测观察HePG2／ADM对化疗药物的敏感性变化。结果 HepG2／ADM细胞是一个明确的多药耐药细胞模型，联合TRAIL(100ng／L) ADM(0．1mg／L)后，MTT显示HepG2／ADM细胞的增殖明显抑制，流式细胞术、TUNEL法检测TRAIL联合ADM处理HePG2／ADM细胞诱导的凋亡，与对照组相比，凋亡指数显著增加。结论 MDR1不参与TRAIL耐受。TRAIL可部分逆转HepG2／ADM对ADM的耐药，增加其对化疗药物的敏感性。联合TRAIL和亚毒剂量化疗药物可望克服肿瘤细胞中存在的化疗耐药和TRAIL耐受。     

HDAC inhibitor treatment of hepatoma cells induces both TRAIL-independent apoptosis and restoration of sensitivity to TRAIL

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) displays a striking resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs or innovative tumor cell apoptosis-inducing agents such as tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL). Recently, we found 2 histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDAC-I), valproic acid and ITF2357, exhibiting inherent therapeutic activity against HCC. In TRAIL-sensitive cancer cells, the mechanism of HDAC-I-induced cell death has been identified to be TRAIL-dependent by inducing apoptosis in an autocrine fashion. In contrast, in HCC-derived cells, a prototype of TRAIL-resistant tumor cells, we found a HDAC-I-mediated apoptosis that works independently of TRAIL and upregulation of death receptors or their cognate ligands. Interestingly, TRAIL resistance could be overcome by a combinatorial application of HDAC-I and TRAIL, increasing the fraction of apoptotic cells two- to threefold compared with HDAC-I treatment alone, whereas any premature HDAC-I withdrawal rapidly restored TRAIL resistance. Furthermore, a tumor cell-specific downregulation of the FLICE inhibitory protein (FLIP) was observed, constituting a new mechanism of TRAIL sensitivity restoration by HDAC-I. In contrast, FLIP levels in primary human hepatocytes (PHH) from different donors were upregulated by HDAC-I. Importantly, combination HDAC-I/TRAIL treatment did not induce any cytotoxicity in nonmalignant PHH. In conclusion, HDAC-I compounds, exhibiting a favorable in vivo profile and inherent activity against HCC cells, are able to selectively overcome the resistance of HCC cells toward TRAIL. Specific upregulation of intracellular FLIP protein levels in nonmalignant hepatocytes could enhance the therapeutic window for clinical applications of TRAIL, opening up a highly specific new treatment option for advanced HCC.     

TRAIL/bortezomib cotreatment is potentially hepatotoxic but induces cancer-specific apoptosis within a therapeutic window

Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) represents a novel promising anticancer biotherapeutic. However, TRAIL-resistant tumor cells require combinatorial regimens to sensitize tumor but not normal cells for TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Here, we investigated the mechanism of the synergistic antitumor effect of bortezomib in combination with TRAIL in hepatoma, colon, and pancreatic cancer cells in comparison to the toxicity in primary human hepatocytes (PHH). TRAIL cotreatment at high but clinically relevant concentrations of bortezomib caused toxicity in PHH which potentially limits the clinical applicability of bortezomib/TRAIL cotreatment. However, at low concentrations of bortezomib TRAIL-resistant hepatoma, colon and pancreatic cancer cell lines but not PHH were efficiently sensitized for TRAIL-induced apoptosis. RNA interference and TRAIL receptor blockage experiments revealed that in bortezomib-treated hepatoma cells TRAIL-R1/TRAIL-R2 up-regulation, enhanced TRAIL DISC formation and cFLIPL down-regulation in addition to accumulation of Bak cooperatively sensitized for TRAIL. Bim, although accumulated upon bortezomib treatment, did not play a causal role for TRAIL sensitization in Hep3b cells. Combined treatment with bortezomib and TRAIL massively reduced the clonogenic capacity of hepatoma cells in vitro. Surviving clones could be resensitized for repeated TRAIL treatment. CONCLUSION: Bortezomib/TRAIL cotreatment bears the risk of severe hepatotoxicity at high but clinically relevant concentrations of bortezomib. However, within a wide therapeutic window bortezomib sensitized different cancer cells but not PHH for TRAIL-induced apoptosis.     

Proteasome inhibition sensitizes hepatocellular carcinoma cells, but not human hepatocytes, to TRAIL

TRAIL exhibits potent anti-tumor activity on systemic administration in mice. Because of its proven in vivo efficacy, TRAIL may serve as a novel anti-neoplastic drug. However, approximately half of the tumor cell lines tested so far are TRAIL resistant, and potential toxic side effects of certain recombinant forms of TRAIL on human hepatocytes have been described. Pretreatment with the proteasome inhibitor MG132 and PS-341 rendered TRAIL-resistant hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cell lines but not primary human hepatocytes sensitive for TRAIL-induced apoptosis. We investigated the different levels of possible MG132-induced interference with resistance to apoptotic signal transduction. Although proteasome inhibition efficiently suppressed nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-kappaB) activity, specific suppression of NF-kappaB by mutIkappaBalpha failed to sensitize TRAIL-resistant cell lines for TRAIL-induced apoptosis. In contrast to the previously reported mechanism of sensitization by 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), cellular FLICE-inhibitory protein (cFLIP)(L) and cFLIP(S) were markedly upregulated in the TRAIL death inducing signaling complex (DISC) by proteasome inhibitor pretreatment. Compared with 5-FU pretreatment, caspase-8 was more efficiently recruited to the DISC in MG132 pretreated cells despite the presence of fewer death receptors and more cFLIP in the DISC. But downregulation of cFLIP by short interference RNA (siRNA) further sensitized the HCC cell lines. In conclusion, these results show that otherwise chemotherapy-resistant tumor cells can be sensitized for TRAIL-induced apoptosis at the DISC level in the presence of high levels of cFLIP, which suggests the existence of an additional factor that modulates the interaction of FADD and the TRAIL death receptors. Of clinical relevance, proteasome inhibitors sensitize HCC cells but not primary human hepatocytes for TRAIL-induced apoptosis.     

Regulation of tumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL)-induced apoptosis in Burkitt's lymphoma cell lines

Tumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) is a potent inducer of apoptosis in sensitive cells and may be suitable for novel anti-cancer therapies aimed at inducing apoptosis via the activation of TRAIL receptors on malignant cells. Here we have characterized the TRAIL sensitivity of a panel of Burkitt's lymphoma (BL) cell lines. Overall, 5/12 BL cell lines and 1/2 lymphoblastoid cell lines were sensitive to TRAIL-induced apoptosis, although only one BL cell line approached the sensitivity of Jurkat cells, a widely used model for TRAIL-induced apoptosis. Whereas, 4/5 of the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-negative cell lines were TRAIL sensitive, only 1/7 EBV-positive BL cell lines were TRAIL sensitive. However, isogenic BL cell lines with different EBV status were not differently sensitive to TRAIL, indicating that EBV is not a major determinant of TRAIL sensitivity. All cell lines expressed the death receptor (DR)5 TRAIL receptor, whereas expression of DR4 was more variable. Differences in the expression of downstream signalling molecules [Fas-associated death domain protein (FADD), caspase 8] and inhibitors [decoy receptor 1 (DcR1), cellular FLICE-like inhibitory protein (c-FLIP)] did not correlate with TRAIL sensitivity. Therefore, a subset of BL cell lines are sensitive to TRAIL-induced apoptosis, however, the molecular mechanism that determines responsiveness remains to be identified.     

Fluid shear stress induces lipocalin-type prostaglandin D(2) synthase expression in vascular endothelial cells

Ligands for peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma, such as the thiazolidinedione class of antidiabetic drugs and 15-deoxy-Delta(12,14)-prostaglandin J(2) (15d-PGJ(2)), modulate various processes in atherogenesis. In search of cells that generate prostaglandin D(2) (PGD(2)), the metabolic precursor of 15d-PGJ(2), we identified PGD(2) from culture medium of endothelial cells. To study how PGD(2) production is regulated in endothelial cells, we investigated the role of fluid shear stress in the metabolism of PGD(2). Endothelial cells expressed the mRNA for the lipocalin-type PGD(2) synthase (L-PGDS) both in vitro and in vivo. Loading laminar shear stress using a parallel-plate flow chamber markedly enhanced the gene expression of L-PGDS, with the maximal effect being obtained at 15 to 30 dyne/cm(2). The expression began to increase within 6 hours after loading shear stress and reached the maximal level at 18 to 24 hours. In contrast, shear stress did not alter the expression levels of PGI(2) synthase and thromboxane A(2) synthase. In parallel with the increase in the expression level of L-PGDS, endothelial cells released PGD(2) and 15d-PGJ(2) into culture medium. These results demonstrate that shear stress promotes PGD(2) production by stimulating L-PGDS expression and suggest the possibility that a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma ligand is produced in vascular wall in response to blood flow.     

Expression of tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) receptors and sensitivity to TRAIL-induced apoptosis in primary B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia cells

Because tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) (Apo2 ligand) preferentially kills malignant cells while sparing normal cells, it may be therapeutically useful against cancers, including those of haematopoietic origin. Although the activity of TRAIL has been studied in tumour cell lines and in a limited number of different primary tumours, its overall activity in a large number of uniform cases of primary tumours is not known. We therefore studied the activity of TRAIL in 29 primary precursor B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) samples. TRAIL was found to have a modest activity as it killed a maximum of 29% of ALL cells within 18 h compared with killing 75% of Jurkat cells. The sensitivity to TRAIL did not correlate with the pattern of TRAIL receptor expression or FLIP expression, as determined by Western blot analysis. The CD40 receptor, which can transduce survival signals in mature malignant B cells, was less frequently expressed on ALL cells, but incubation with an exogenous soluble CD40 ligand trimer did not rescue them from spontaneous apoptosis and did not mediate their resistance to TRAIL. Further, although ALL cells expressed TRAIL protein, they failed to kill target Jurkat cells in a TRAIL-dependent manner. Our data delineate major biological differences between mature and precursor malignant B cells and suggest a limited therapeutic role for TRAIL as a single agent in primary B-cell ALL.     

Chemical sensitization and regulation of TRAIL-induced apoptosis in a panel of B-lymphocytic leukaemia cell lines

Tumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) effectively kills tumour cells but not normal cells. We investigated TRAIL sensitivity and the TRAIL-induced apoptosis signalling pathway in a panel of B-lymphocytic leukaemia cell lines. Depending upon TRAIL sensitivity, leukaemia cells could be divided into three groups: highly sensitive, moderately sensitive and resistant. TRAIL receptor-2 (DR5) plays an important role in transducing apoptosis signals. DR5 was internalized into the cytoplasm where it recruited FAS-associated death domain protein (FADD) under TRAIL stimulation in both sensitive and resistant cells. However, the active form of caspase-8 was recruited to FADD and only sensitive cells showed increased caspase-8 activity upon TRAIL stimulation. The caspase-8 specific inhibitor, Z-IETD, impaired caspase-8 activation and completely abrogated TRAIL-induced apoptosis. These results suggest that TRAIL resistance in B-lymphocytic leukaemia cells is due to negative regulation at the level of caspase-8 activation and that caspase-8 activation is an indispensable process in TRAIL-induced apoptosis. However, FADD-like interleukin-1 beta-converting enzyme inhibitory protein (c-FLIPL) was similarly expressed and down-regulated after TRAIL stimulation in both sensitive and resistant cells. Interestingly, in some cell lines, TRAIL sensitivity and caspase-8 activity was enhanced or restored with the treatment of cycloheximide (CHX). In addition, X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis (XIAP) levels decreased significantly and rapidly following treatment with CHX. Down-regulation of XIAP may be responsible for enhancement or restoration of TRAIL sensitivity after CHX treatment in B-lymphocytic leukaemia cells.     

TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand death pathway-mediated human beta-cell destruction

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study is to investigate whether apoptosis in human beta cells can be related to the induction of the tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) pathway. METHODS: We examined the expression of TRAIL and TRAIL receptors in two human pancreatic beta-cell lines and in human primary islet cells using RT-PCR assays and flow cytometric analyses and tested TRAIL-mediated beta-cell destruction in (51)Cr release cytotoxicity assays, Annexin-V and APO-DIREC assays. RESULTS: Most of the human beta cells express TRAIL receptors-R1, -R2, -R3, -R4 and/or TRAIL. TRAIL induced much stronger cytotoxicity and apoptosis to beta-cell lines CM and HP62 than did FasL, TNF-alpha, LTalpha1beta2, LTalpha2beta1, LIGHT, and IFN-gamma. The cytotoxicity and apoptosis induced by TRAIL to beta-cell lines CM were inhibited competitively by soluble TRAIL receptors, R1, R2, R3 or R4. Treatment of these beta cells with antibodies against TRAIL receptors was able to block the cytotoxicity of TRAIL to these cells. Beta-cell antigen-specific CTL (CD4(+) and CD8(+)) clones express TRAIL, suggesting that these cells are potential sources of TRAIL-inducing beta-cell destruction. Normal primary islet cells from most donors are resistant to the cytotoxicity mediated by TRAIL. However, treatment with an inhibitor of protein synthesis (cycloheximide) or with an enzyme (PI-PLC) that can remove TRAIL-R3 from the islet-cell membrane was able to increase the susceptibility of TRAIL-resistant primary islet cells to the TRAIL death pathway. CONCLUSION/INTERPRETATION: The TRAIL death pathway is present and can function in human islet beta cells, but unidentified inhibitors of the TRAIL death pathway are present in normal islet cells.