The beliefs,and reported and intended behaviors of unaffected men in response to their family history of prostate cancer

PurposeGenetic testing for hereditary cancer facilitates medical management and improves health outcomes. Genetic testing is not currently available for prostate cancer, but trials are underway to investigate if antiandrogens and selenium have a preventive role for at-risk individuals. To inform future genetic counseling, we sought to understand the pre-existing beliefs and behaviors of men with a family history of prostate cancer and explore their intention to adopt possible preventive behaviors in response to test results.MethodsA survey was completed by 280 men (response: 59%).ResultsThe belief that diet influenced prostate cancer risk was held by 73% of participants, whereas 37% believed in medication/natural therapies. Thirty-nine percent reported at least one change to their diet, alcohol consumption, smoking, exercise patterns, vitamin/mineral/supplement intake and/or medication/natural therapy in response to their family history. The men expressed interest in genetic testing with 92% “definitely” or “probably” interested. Definite interest was associated with number of affected relatives and prostate cancer-related anxiety. A positive genetic test would motivate 93% of men to make at least one behavioral change.ConclusionsParticipants commonly believed behavioral factors influenced prostate cancer risk and reported that they would alter their behavior to reduce risk after (hypothetical) genetic testing.     

Condom use rather than serosorting explains differences in HIV incidence among men who have sex with men

BACKGROUND: HIV incidence is high and increasing among men who have sex with men (MSM) attending the Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) Outpatient Clinic in Amsterdam but remains low among MSM in the Amsterdam Cohort Studies (ACS). We studied whether sexual behaviors in these 2 groups are consistent with serosorting and if serosorting explains the difference in HIV incidence. METHODS: In 2004 to 2006, a survey of sexual behaviors and HIV status regarding up to 4 traceable partners in the prior 6 months was performed in MSM attending the STI Outpatient Clinic (high-risk) and in MSM in the ACS (lower risk). Moreover, pooled information was collected on anonymous partners. We used logistic regression to test whether sexual behaviors are consistent with serosorting and to test whether risk group is associated with having concordant traceable partners among men reporting unprotected anal intercourse (UAI). RESULTS: We included 513 MSM (54% lower risk and 75% HIV-negative). Lower risk and high-risk MSM with concordant traceable partners were more likely to have UAI than MSM with discordant partners or partners of unknown HIV status (P < 0.001). Risk group was not associated with having concordant UAI. Compared with lower risk MSM, however, high-risk MSM frequently had UAI with nonconcordant traceable partners and with anonymous partners. CONCLUSIONS: Sexual risk behaviors with traceable partners are consistent with serosorting. Nonetheless, the higher level of UAI with anonymous or nonconcordant traceable partners more likely explains the increasing HIV incidence seen among STI Outpatient Clinic attendees than a difference in serosorting behavior.     

Information needs of men regarding prostate cancer screening and the effect of a brief decision aid

BACKGROUND: Little is known about what information affects men's decisions about prostate cancer screening. METHODS: We developed a four-part decision aid about prostate cancer screening and tested it in men, ages 45-85, to determine how the information in each part--(1) the epidemiology of prostate cancer; (2) the PSA test; (3) prostate biopsy and treatment options for prostate cancer; and (4) balance sheets to aid decision-making--affected men's interest in screening. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-eight men from one general internal medicine clinic participated in our study (response rate 65%). Before the decision aid, 76% were interested in screening; 8% were not; and 16% were undecided. The decision aid increased the proportion of men who knew the advantages (+28%; 95% CI: 21-35) and disadvantages (+55%; 95% CI: 48-63%) of screening. It also increased the proportion who knew enough to make a decision (+24; 95% CI: 16-32%). It did not change men's interest in screening (P = 0.134). Twenty percent of men, however, did change their interest category. Men who were undecided at baseline were more likely to change than those who were interested or not interested. There were no clinically meaningful changes in interest following each component part of the decision aid. CONCLUSION: Interest in prostate cancer screening is high and remained high after a 10 min decision aid. The decision aid increased the proportion of men with sufficient information to decide about screening. It also changed 20% of men's interest in screening. Because no single piece of information was influential to decision-making in all men, clinicians may want to tailor information to men's individual needs.     

Overcoming barriers to HIV testing: preferences for new strategies among clients of a needle exchange,a sexually transmitted disease clinic,and sex venues for men who have sex with men

OBJECTIVE: To determine strategies to overcome barriers to HIV testing among persons at risk. METHODS: We developed a survey that elicited testing motivators, barriers, and preferences for new strategies among 460 participants at a needle exchange, three sex venues for men who have sex with men, and a sexually transmitted disease clinic. RESULTS: Barriers to testing included factors influenced by individual concern (fear and discrimination); by programs, policies, and laws (named reporting and inability to afford treatment); and by counseling and testing strategies (dislike of counseling, anxiety waiting for results, and venipuncture). The largest proportions of participants preferred rapid testing strategies, including clinic-based testing (27%) and home self-testing (20%); roughly equal proportions preferred oral fluid testing (18%), urine testing (17%), and standard blood testing (17%). One percent preferred home specimen collection. Participants who had never tested before were significantly more likely to prefer home self-testing compared with other strategies. Blacks were significantly more likely to prefer urine testing. CONCLUSIONS: Strategies for improving acceptance of HIV counseling and testing include information about access to anonymous testing and early treatment. Expanding options for rapid testing, urine testing, and home self-testing; providing alternatives to venipuncture; making pretest counseling optional; and allowing telephone results disclosure may encourage more persons to learn their HIV status.     

Newborn blood spot screening and genetic services: a survey of Minnesota primary care physicians.

PURPOSE: To (1) obtain guidance on the preferred content and format of quick reference newborn blood spot screening information from the Minnesota Department of Health; (2) determine primary care physicians' perceptions of the benefits of genetic services; and (3) determine primary care physicians' satisfaction with genetic counseling services. METHODS: A written survey was mailed to family physicians and pediatricians in Minnesota (n = 300). RESULTS: Eighty physicians responded (28% response rate). Whereas 70% of respondents felt previous information received from the newborn screening program was adequate, 83% were interested in quick reference information. The majority of physicians preferred this information as a laminated sheet (63%). Physician procedure for an abnormal screen, newborn screening program protocol for an abnormal screen, and disease treatment and follow-up information were recommended for inclusion on quick reference. Over half of physicians agreed with the following benefits of genetic services: provide testing options (88%); evaluate family members (88%); reduce parental anxiety (87%); provide resources (83%); provide diagnostic information (76%); determine medical needs (67%); and determine emotional needs (51%). Ninety-nine percent of physicians were satisfied with genetic counseling services. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians indicated that reference material for primary care physicians should include a quick reference card with specific categories of information. Newborn screening programs should attempt to increase physician awareness of genetic services, including the subsequent medical and psychosocial benefits for their patients.     

Familial testicular cancer: interest in genetic testing among high-risk family members.

PURPOSE: This study is part of an ongoing National Cancer Institute multidisciplinary, etiologically-focused, cross-sectional study of Familial Testicular Cancer (FTC). The current report targets interest in clinical genetic testing for susceptibility to FTC. METHODS: Demographics, knowledge, health beliefs, and psychological and social factors were evaluated as covariates related to interest in genetic testing. RESULTS: The majority (66%) of 229 participants (64 affected men, 66 unaffected men, and 99 women) from 47 multiple-case FTC families expressed interest in having a genetic test within 6 months, should such a test become available. Interest was similar among the three subgroups mentioned above. Worries about insurance discrimination based on genetic test results were associated with a significantly lower interest in testing. Alternatively, participants were more likely to be interested in genetic testing if they were younger and had higher levels of family support, a physician's recommendation supporting testing, cancer distress, and a need for information to inform the health care of their children. CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals social and relationship factors that FTC survivors and their relatives considered important when contemplating the use of new genetic technologies. This is the first study describing hypothetical interest in genetic testing for familial testicular cancer.     

Preferences for Labor and Delivery Practices Between Pregnant Immigrants and US-Born Patients: A Comparative Prospective Antenatal Survey Study

ObjectiveTo compare preferences in pregnant Somali and Sudanese immigrants with US-born women for different labor and delivery procedures and practices.Study Design: Pregnant women who received prenatal care services at the Jericho Road Family Practice were surveyed. Ninety-three consecutive patients agreed to participate. A translator-facilitated questionnaire was administered to Somali-, Sudanese-, and US-born women during antenatal visits.Results: For pain relief in labor, 66.7% of US-born, 64.0% of Somali, and 12.5% of Sudanese women preferred epidural analgesia (p = .002). More US-born women preferred for the umbilical cord to be cut by their partners (76.2%) vs Somali (6.7%) and Sudanese (0%) (p < .001). For infant feeding, more US-born women (47%) preferred only formula feeding (Somali, 3.4%; Sudanese, 0%; p < .001). Responses were not statistically different for other preference questions, such as mobility/position in labor, attendants in labor, and duration of hospital stay.Conclusions: This prospective survey quantifies the differences in preferences for labor and delivery practices from two foreign populations and from US-born women. This information is useful for all physicians who wish to better meet the needs of individual patients, especially those who are from different cultures and backgrounds.     

Cancer worries, risk perceptions and associations with interest in DNA testing and clinic satisfaction in a familial colorectal cancer clinic

Multi-disciplinary familial cancer clinics are becoming an integral part of cancer services. It is, therefore, important to assess how attendance at these clinics impacts on cancer-related concerns, risk perceptions and behavioural intentions, and how the clinic services are being received by those using them. This study has assessed a familial colorectal cancer clinic with respect to cancer-related worries and risk perceptions and their impact on interest in DNA testing and overall satisfaction with the clinic. Pre- and post-clinic questionnaires were completed by 127 patients and relatives attending the clinic. After attending the clinic, the proportion of people 'very' or 'extremely' worried about developing bowel cancer reduced from 49 (pre-clinic) to 34% (p = 0.002). Worry about bowel cancer was positively associated with younger age, higher education level and higher perceived risk of developing cancer. A reduction in level of risk perception correlated with a lower likelihood of feeling 'very worried' about developing bowel cancer. Of those intending to go ahead with DNA testing, 58% were 'very worried' about bowel cancer compared with 15% of those not intending to proceed with testing, suggesting that worry was a motivation for interest in DNA testing. One-third of participants indicated another session of genetic counselling would be helpful. Within this group, a higher proportion was very worried about bowel cancer (43%) than for those who did not want another session (17%). Attendance at this familial colorectal cancer clinic alleviated worry for many individuals, partly due to improved information about risk of colorectal cancer.     

The influence of partner type and risk status on the sexual behavior of young men who have sex with men living with HIV/AIDS

OBJECTIVES: The influence of partner type and risk status on the unprotected sexual behavior of young men living with HIV (YMLH) who have sex with men is examined. METHODS: Sexual behavior and sexual partner characteristics of 217 YMLH recruited from adolescent care clinics in 4 AIDS epicenters (Los Angeles, San Francisco, New York, and Miami) were assessed. YMLH were categorized by sexual behavior pattern, and sexual partners were classified by type and risk status. Generalized linear modeling employing overdispersed Poisson distribution was used to analyze the effect of partner type and partner risk status on unprotected sex acts. RESULTS: Most YMLH (62%) reported multiple partners, 26% reported 1 sexual partner, and 12% reported abstinence in the past 3 months. Approximately 34% of polygamous and 28% of monogamous youth engaged in unprotected sex. Monogamous youth were most likely to have unprotected sex with HIV-positive partners. Polygamous youth were most likely to have unprotected sex with HIV-positive partners, irrespective of whether the partner was regular or casual. For polygamous YMLH, unprotected sex did not differ among single-time/new partners with different risk levels. CONCLUSIONS: Partner characteristics influence the condom use behavior of YMLH. YMLH make decisions regarding condom use based on perception of their partner's risk. Preventive interventions must include skills for acquiring accurate information about partner risk status and education regarding the health risks of unprotected sex with HIV seroconcordant partners.     

Impact of numeracy preferences on information needs for genome sequencing results

ObjectiveThis study investigated how self-reported numeracy ability and preferences predict preferences for the amount and types of information provided about genome sequencing results among 1080 women diagnosed with breast cancer at age 40 or younger.MethodsParticipants reported their level of interest in 14 topics related to genome sequencing results on a survey. We calculated a Participant Information Needs (PIN) value based on the number of topics for which a participant wanted “a lot” of information. Numeracy was assessed using the Subjective Numeracy Scale. Analyses examined associations between the numeracy ability and preferences subscales, information needs for individual content topics, and PIN.ResultsHigher preference for numeric data was correlated with increased PIN (β = 0.60, p < 0.01), while numeric ability was not correlated (β=0.16, p = 0.22). Family composition and knowledge about sequencing benefits were also significant covariates. Patients most preferred information on topics related to disease risk and health implications.ConclusionThere may be utility in separating numeracy ability and preferences into two components in future research in order to investigate how numeracy impacts the return of genetic testing results.Practice ImplicationsThese data suggest that numeracy preferences may be important to inform strategies for the return of genetic results.     

Predicting HIV transmission risk among HIV-infected men who have sex with men: findings from the healthy living project

OBJECTIVE: To examine the predictors of transmission risk among HIV-infected men who have sex with men (MSM) in 4 US cities. METHOD: Individual computer-assisted interviews assessing psychologic measures and sexual behavior with the 5 most recent male and female partners were conducted with a diverse sample of 1910 HIV-infected MSM recruited from community and clinic settings in San Francisco, New York, Los Angeles, and Milwaukee. Transmission-risk events were defined as unprotected vaginal or anal sex with a partner who was HIV negative or of unknown status. RESULTS: A small but not insignificant proportion of MSM (12.7%) reported at least 1 transmission-risk event in the previous 3 months, with 57% of those events taking place with casual as opposed to steady partners. Multivariate predictors of transmission risk with casual partners were stimulant (eg, crystal methamphetamine) and other drug use, having low coping self-efficacy, and not having disclosed one's HIV serostatus to all partners. Stimulant use and failing to disclosing one's serostatus to all partners were associated with risk in primary relationships. CONCLUSIONS: Responding to HIV transmission risk in MSM requires different strategies for primary and casual partners.     

A community-based randomised controlled trial of three different educational resources for men about prostate cancer screening

Randomised evaluations of resources to facilitate informed decisions about prostate cancer screening are rarely conducted. In this study, 421 men recruited from the community were randomly allocated to receive a leaflet (n = 140) or one of two resources meeting criteria for a decision-aid: a video (n = 141) or an evidence-based booklet, developed by the authors (n = 140). Men in all three groups demonstrated significant increases in knowledge scores from pre to post-test. Scores were significantly higher at post-test amongst those who had received our evidence-based booklet compared with men who received the leaflet or video (P < 0.001). Scores were significantly modified by men's preferences for decisional control (P = 0.002). Decisional conflict was significantly lower amongst men receiving the evidence-based booklet (P = 0.038). Men receiving the evidence-based booklet also were less likely to accept a recommendation by a GP to undergo prostate-specific-antigen (PSA) screening (P = 0.003). Men require detailed information about the pros and cons of PSA screening in order to make an informed decision. Resources are not equivalent in achieving these outcomes.     

Interest in genetic testing among affected men from hereditary prostate cancer families and their unaffected male relatives

PurposeThe objective of this study was to evaluate potential sociodemographic, medical, psychosocial, and behavioral correlates of interest in genetic testing in men from hereditary prostate cancer families.MethodsFamily members affected with prostate cancer (n = 559) and their unaffected male relatives (n = 370) completed a mailed survey. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine the association between potential correlates and interest in genetic testing for prostate cancer.ResultsForty-five percent of affected and 56% of unaffected men reported that they definitely would take a genetic test for prostate cancer. More affected men reported high levels of familiarity with genetic testing than unaffected men (46 vs. 25%). There were several variables that were significantly correlated with interest in either affected or unaffected men, but only age and familiarity with genetics were significant in both groups. After controlling for confounding variables, only familiarity remained a significant correlate in both groups.ConclusionsThe contrast between low levels of familiarity with genetics and high test interest among unaffected men highlights the need for increased educational efforts targeting hereditary prostate cancer families. Overall, results illuminated several novel characteristics of men from hereditary prostate cancer families that should be considered when developing future informed consent procedures or educational materials for prostate cancer genetic testing.     

A novel approach to increase awareness about hereditary colon cancer using a state cancer registry

PurposeThe aim of this project was to conduct educational outreach about hereditary colon cancer to a targeted high risk population identified through a state cancer registry.MethodsIndividuals who met one of the first three Bethesda criteria guidelines were identified through the Colorado Central Cancer Registry. The physician of record received a brochure, survey and form to provide written consent to contact patient(s). Cases were mailed an educational brochure, initial and follow-up survey.ResultsFive hundred seventy-five cases and 412 physicians were identified; 81% provided consent. Ninety percent of physicians felt the registry should provide this information to at-risk patients. Twenty-three percent of the cases returned the survey. Cases were generally glad to get the information. Only four cases reported concern. The majority agreed the cancer registry should send the information, however most preferred their physicians be consented first. At follow-up, 20 cases reported having or intending to have a risk assessment.ConclusionsResponse from physicians and cases was positive, suggesting that targeted outreach using cancer registries, in combination with physician notification, may be a viable approach to educational outreach about cancer genetics. A proportion of cases sought risk assessment, suggesting that mail-based outreach may be effective in increasing uptake of information and/or genetic services.     

Motivations for participating in an HIV vaccine efficacy trial

Understanding why people join HIV vaccine efficacy trials is critical for trial recruitment and education efforts. We assessed participants' motivations for joining the VaxGen VAX004 study, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 multicenter trial. Of 5417 participants, 94% were men who have sex with men (MSM) and 6% were women at risk for heterosexual transmission of HIV. Most participants gave altruistic reasons for trial participation: 99% reported having joined to help find an HIV vaccine, and 98% reported having joined to help their community. Some gave more personal reasons: 56% joined to reduce risk behavior and 46% joined to get protection from HIV. Additional reasons related to receiving services or compensation included to obtain information about HIV (75%), to receive free HIV testing (34%), and for financial reimbursement (14%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that female participants were significantly more motivated than male participants to join the trial for protection and to receive services or compensation (all P<0.05). Participants with 13 or more sex partners in the 6 months before enrollment were more likely than those with fewer sex partners to report having joined the trial for protection but less likely to have joined to reduce risk behavior (both P<0.05). Because many participants reported personal protection from HIV as their reason for joining, vaccine trial risk-reduction counseling should continue to emphasize the placebo-controlled trial design and unknown efficacy of the test product, particularly for women and persons with large numbers of sex partners. Because a significant minority of participants reported joining to receive HIV information, HIV testing, and financial reimbursement, a need is indicated for provision of HIV prevention services outside research trials and for monitoring to ensure that participants are not motivated to join trials for financial gain.     

Negotiated safety relationships and sexual behavior among a diverse sample of HIV-negative men who have sex with men

OBJECTIVE: To examine the prevalence of negotiated safety (NS) in a diverse sample of HIV-negative men who have sex with men (MSM), characteristics of MSM practicing NS, and adherence to NS. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional survey of San Francisco MSM recruited from venues and community organizations. NS relationships were defined as those in which HIV-negative men were in seroconcordant primary relationships for >/=6 months, had unprotected anal intercourse (UA) together, and had rules prohibiting UA with others. Adherence to NS was determined from self-reported sexual behavior in the prior 3 months. Presence of an agreement with NS partners to disclose rule breaking was also determined. RESULTS: Of 340 HIV-negative participants, 76 (22%) reported a current seroconcordant primary relationship for >/=6 months. Of these 76 men, 38 (50%) had NS relationships, 30 (39%) had no UA with primary partners, and 8 (11%) had UA with primary partners without rules prohibiting UA with others. In multivariate analysis, NS was more common than no UA with primary partners in younger men. Among 38 NS men, 29% violated their NS-defining rule in the prior 3 months, including 18% who reported UA with others, and 18% reported a sexually transmitted infection (STI) in the prior year. Only 61% of NS men adhered fully to rules and agreed to disclose rule breaking. CONCLUSIONS: Although NS was commonly practiced among HIV-negative men in seroconcordant relationships, some men violated NS-defining rules, placing themselves and potentially their primary partners at risk for HIV infection. Prevention efforts regarding NS should emphasize the importance of agreement adherence, disclosure of rule breaking, and routine STI testing.     

A comparison of on-line and off-line sexual risk in men who have sex with men: an event-based on-line survey

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether men who have sex with men (MSM) are more likely to report unprotected anal intercourse (UAI) with partners met on-line compared with those met off-line. METHODS: A total of 6122 individuals consented to participate in an anonymous behavioral survey on-line. This event-based analysis is limited to the 1683 men from the United States and Canada who had sex in the 3 months before the study and reported that their last sexual encounter included a new or casual male partner or partners. Prevalence and predictors of UAI were analyzed separately for the 386 men reporting more than 1 partner (multiple) and the 1297 men reporting only 1 (single) partner in their last encounter. RESULTS: Of the 1683 MSM recruited on-line, 51% met their partner(s) in their last sexual encounter on-line and 23% reported UAI. No difference in risk for UAI was found for partners met on-line versus off-line in the bivariate or multivariate analyses. In a multivariate analysis of men with multiple-partner encounters, UAI was significantly associated with being HIV-seropositive (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 2.87; P = 0.02) in a model that included age; education; whether partners were met on-line or off-line; and use of crystal methamphetamine, sildenafil, or alcohol before sex. Using the same model, significant predictors of UAI in men reporting a single-partner encounter were use of crystal methamphetamine (adjusted OR = 5.67; P = 0.001) and no college degree (adjusted OR = 1.63; P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: MSM recruited on-line who reported a new or casual sex partner(s) in the prior 3 months are at considerable risk of HIV or other sexually transmitted infections, but they are equally likely to report UAI whether sex partners were met on-line or off-line. The Internet may be an ideal venue for reaching high-risk MSM.     

Unprotected anal intercourse between potentially HIV-serodiscordant men who have sex with men,San Francisco

BACKGROUND: Increasing trends in high-risk sexual behavior are noted among men who have sex with men (MSM) worldwide. Less information is available on unprotected sex between persons of different HIV serostatus. METHODS: From 1999 through 2001, volunteers of a community-based organization conducted interviews of 10,579 MSM at gay-oriented venues in San Francisco and in neighborhoods with high-volume MSM pedestrian traffic. The questionnaire recorded demographic and risk behavior information, including self-reported and partners' HIV serostatus. RESULTS: Potentially serodiscordant unprotected anal intercourse (UAI) with at least 2 anal sex partners was reported by 12.7% and increased from 11.0% in 1999 to 16.2% in 2001. Stratifying by self-reported HIV serostatus, 20.8% of HIV-positive respondents, 12.1% of HIV-negative respondents, and 13.4% of MSM who did not know or report their own HIV serostatus had potentially serodiscordant UAI. Older MSM of white race were more likely to report potentially serodiscordant UAI among HIV-positive respondents, whereas younger MSM of white race were more likely to report potentially serodiscordant UAI among HIV-negative respondents. Among those with unknown HIV serostatus, MSM of color were more likely to engage in potentially serodiscordant UAI. CONCLUSION: Recent increases in UAI among MSM in San Francisco are not only the result of increases in UAI between persons of the same HIV serostatus. Prevention messages must address disclosure of HIV serostatus to sexual partners specifically tailored to groups according to age, community, and HIV serostatus.