Modulation of esophageal peristalsis by alterations of body position

Previous studies have demonstrated that nonviscous liquids traverse the esophagus more rapidly with the subject in the upright rather than the supine position. Conversely, similar studies have shown that viscous liquids traverse the esophagus at similar rates for both upright and supine positions. Our purpose was to define the motor correlates of these differing responses. Six normal volunteers were studied with an infused catheter system incorpoating a Dent sleeve for monitoring lower esophageal sphincter pressure. The subjects were given a series of swallows of a water and a viscous (52 centipoise) bolus in both the supine and upright positions. In the upright position, the water bolus caused an increased velocity of propagation in the proximal esophageal segment that was associated with a shortening of lower esophageal sphincter relaxation time and reductions in amplitude and duration of contraction. No significant changes in the peristaltic wave were noted with the viscous bolus during alterations of body position. We conclude that the more rapid transit of a nonviscous water bolus through the esophagus in the upright position is reflected in specific alterations of esophageal peristaltic parameters. The possible mechanisms for these differing responses are discussed.     

Inconsistent association of esophageal symptoms, psychometric abnormalities and dysmotility

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to characterize the psychometric profiles of symptomatic patients with abnormal esophageal motility and symptomatic patients with normal manometric findings compared to asymptomatic controls. METHODS: A total of 113 patients with abnormal esophageal motility (7 achalasia, 8 diffuse esophageal spasm, 27 nutcracker esophagus, 37 hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter, 21 hypotensive peristalsis, 13 failed peristalsis), 23 symptomatic controls with similar esophageal symptoms but normal manometry, and 27 asymptomatic controls were enrolled. Validated questionnaires assessing depression (Beck Depression Inventory), anxiety (Spielberger State Anxiety Inventory or Trait Anxiety Inventory), and somatization (Psychosomatic Symptom Checklist) were administered to all subjects. RESULTS: Patients with both esophageal symptoms and either hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter, nutcracker esophagus, or hypotensive contractions exhibited increased somatization, acute anxiety, or depression compared to asymptomatic controls but not compared to symptomatic controls. On the other hand, the psychometric profiles of patients with achalasia and diffuse esophageal spasm were strikingly normal. Among esophageal symptoms, chest pain was closely correlated with psychometric abnormalities. CONCLUSIONS: The esophageal symptoms of patients with abnormal esophageal motility may relate to the underlying psychological abnormalities, independent of manometric abnormalities.     

Normal esophageal function after myotomy in a patient with idiopathic diffuse esophageal spasm.

A 52-year-old man with idiopathic diffuse esophageal spasm and hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter presented with dysphagia for several years. After unsuccessful therapy with forceful pneumatic dilation of the cardia, a myotomy of the cardia and distal esophagus was performed. The patient became asymptomatic, lower esophageal sphincter pressure diminished to less than 10 mm Hg, and esophageal body motor activity was normalized. This situation remains unchanged 6 years after the operation.     

Reassessment of esophageal histology in normal subjects: a comparison of suction and endoscopic techniques

We have examined esophageal biopsies from 18 asymptomatic volunteers. These normal subjects were also evaluated by esophageal manometry with determination of motor function of the esophagus and lower esophageal sphincter pressure, a modified Bernstein acid infusion test, and a basal pH reflux test. In 12 subjects, biopsies were obtained by suction technique; the remaining six had pinch biopsies performed during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Forty-nine (92.5%) of the 53 suction biopsies yielded tissue as deep as muscularis mucosa or at least ample amounts of lamina propria. In contrast, all 28 endoscopic biopsies yielded squamous epithelium only. Moreover, suction biopsies were generally well-oriented (83%), whereas endoscopic biopsies were less commonly well-oriented (35.7%). All volunteer subjects had a negative acid reflux test confirming the absence of latent or asymptomatic reflux. Only one subject (5.6%) had biopsies which met histologic criteria for gastroesophageal reflux. We conclude that: 1) more tissue, more information, and better orientation is achieved with suction than with endoscopic biopsies of the esophagus; 2) the low false-positive rate observed in volunteers in whom gastroesophageal reflux was objectively excluded emphasizes the value of esophageal biopsy as a reliable index in the evaluation of gastroesophageal reflux.     

Esophageal Disease in Patients with Angina-like Chest Pain

To assess the frequency of esophageal disease in patients with angina-like chest pain and normal coronary arteriograms, 16 patients underwent esophageal manometric studies, acid perfusion (Bernstein) tests, upper gastrointestinal series and cholecystograms. Five patients had evidence of esophageal disease. Three of the five had manometric criteria of increased nonperistalsis; one patient had idiopathic diffuse esophageal spasm while the other two patients had acid infusion tests which reproduced the presenting chest pain and the manometric findings were regarded as a motor disturbance of the esophagus secondary to chronic gastroesophageal reflux. The remaining two patients had symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux—one with an acid infusion test positive for pressure-like chest pain and the other with a decreased resting lower esophageal sphincter pressure associated with reflux of barium on upper gastrointestinal series. All five patients had improvement of symptoms during a follow-up period of seven to 17 months. Manometric studies in 18 normal subjects of similar age revealed no evidence of esophageal disease. Since esophageal disorders capable of causing chest pain were diagnosed in one-third of the patients (5/16 or 31%), it is suggested that investigations for esophageal disease, specifically directed at gastroesophageal reflux-induced abnormalities and idiopathic diffuse esophageal spasm, be included in the evaluation of patients with angina-like chest pain of uncertain origin.     

Esophageal motility in cirrhotics with and without esophageal varices

Esophageal manometry was performed in 45 cirrhotics with varices, in 15 cirrhotics without varices, and in 20 normal subjects, to define the effect of varices on esophageal motility. Cirrhotics with varices showed a decreased amplitude of motor waves in the lower half of the esophagus (p less than 0.01), an increased duration of primary peristaltic waves along the entire length of the esophagus (upper esophagus, p less than 0.05; lower esophagus, p less than 0.01), and an increased peak-to-peak speed of primary peristaltic waves (p less than 0.01). Resting lower esophageal sphincter pressure and duration of sphincter relaxation were similar in patients and controls. The above-mentioned abnormalities might be due to the mechanical effect of the presence of varices.     

Influence of migrating motor complex on esophageal motility

In most fasting mammals motility of the foregut and small intestine undergoes regular cycles of activity. The phenomenon has been called the interdigestive migrating myoelectric complex or the migrating motor complex. As shown in published literature, feeding interrupts the cycle and changes the interdigestive fasted pattern into a pattern of irregular spiking activity, which has been called the fed pattern. The mapping of the migrating motor complex throughout the upper gut demonstrated major regional variations. The incidence of migrating motor complex at multiple sites from distal esophagus to cecum approximated a normal distribution. In the course of esophageal manometric studies the influence of migrating motor complex on lower esophageal sphincter was observed. This observation raised the question whether future pharmacomanometric studies should be performed with volunteers in the fasting state as done until now. According to published literature, lower esophageal sphincter pressure is significantly higher during migrating motor complex phase III than phase I; differences are approximately twofold. Fifty percent of migrating motor complexes involve the esophagus. The migrating motor complex in some individuals interferes significantly with esophageal pharmacomanometry provided the volunteers are fasted. On the other hand postprandial lower esophageal sphincter pressure was rather constant at a level comparable with that measured in migrating motor complex phase I. The consequences of this phenomenon for the study design in pharmacomanometry are discussed.     

Differences in cytochrome c oxidase capacity in smooth muscle of opossum esophagus and lower esophageal sphincter

The tonic contraction that defines the lower esophageal sphincter is exclusively aerobic, whereas the rhythmic contractions that characterize the smooth muscle of the esophageal body can be partially sustained anaerobically. Also, relative mitochondrial mass is greater in the sphincter than it is in the body of the esophagus. Full-thickness strips of the muscularis propria of the opossum esophagus were examined as to cytochrome c oxidase capacity to test the hypothesis that differences in oxidative metabolism exist among different levels of the smooth-muscled esophagus. Homogenates were examined as to rate of cytochrome c oxidation, deoxyribonucleic acid content, and protein content. The rate of cytochrome c oxidation was greatest at the top of the smooth muscle segment and declined distally to reach the lowest value in the lower esophageal sphincter. Deoxyribonucleic acid content did not differ among levels examined. Protein/deoxyribonucleic acid ratios were lower in the sphincter than at other levels of the smooth-muscled esophagus. The results indicate that the sphincter muscle has a lower capacity for oxidative metabolism than does the body, that a gradient exists along the esophageal body in oxidative capacity, and that smooth muscle cells in the sphincter are likely to be smaller than are those of the esophageal body. The gradient in oxidative capacity along the esophageal body may be related to other gradients that have been described in this region.     

Esophageal peristaltic dysfunction in peptic esophagitis

Esophageal exposure to acid is a major determinant in the pathogenesis of reflux esophagitis. In this study, we analyzed the esophageal peristaltic function of 177 patients and asymptomatic volunteers for abnormalities that could lead to prolonged esophageal acid clearance. The subjects were divided into five groups: normal volunteers, patient controls, patients with noninflammatory gastroesophageal reflux disease, patients with mild esophagitis, and ones with severe esophagitis. Manometric data were analyzed for the occurrence of failed primary peristalsis, for the occurrence of feeble peristalsis in the distal esophagus, and for hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter pressure. From an analysis of the data on control patients, peristaltic dysfunction was defined as the occurrence of either failed primary peristalsis or hypotensive peristalsis in the distal esophagus for over half of the test swallows. Peristaltic dysfunction was increasingly prevalent with increasing severity of peptic esophagitis, occurring in 25% of patients with mild esophagitis and 48% of patients with severe esophagitis. A correlation did not exist between the occurrence of peristaltic dysfunction and hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter pressure (less than or equal to 10 mmHg). We conclude that peristaltic dysfunction occurs in a substantial minority of patients with peptic esophagitis and could contribute to increased esophageal exposure to refluxed acid material.     

Cardiovascular autonomic function, autoantibodies, and esophageal motor activity in patients with systemic sclerosis and mixed connective tissue disease

OBJECTIVE: To study cardiovascular autonomic nerve function and presence of autoantibodies in relation to esophageal motor activity in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and mixed connective tissue disease (MCTD). METHODS: Twenty-five patients with SSc (13 limited, 12 diffuse cutaneous disease; disease duration 1-19 yrs) and 6 patients with MCTD (disease duration 1-10 yrs) were studied. Cardiovascular autonomic function was assessed using 5 standard tests and autoantibody status determined. Esophageal motor activity and lower and upper esophageal sphincter pressures were recorded manometrically. RESULTS: Five patients with SSc had definite, 7 borderline, and 13 no autonomic dysfunction; 23 had antinuclear. 9 anti-Sc170, 4 anticentromere, and 1 U1snRNP antibodies. Contraction amplitudes in the smooth muscle as well as the striated muscle esophagus and lower esophageal sphincter pressures were significantly lower and autonomic dysfunction more frequent in patients with than in those without anti-Sc170 (6 of 9 vs 6 of 16 patients); upper esophageal sphincter pressures did not differ. All patients with MCTD had antinuclear antibodies, 5 had definite autonomic dysfunction; their lower esophageal sphincter pressures were significantly lower than in SSc patients without anti-Sc170 and anti-U1snRNP. CONCLUSION: Esophageal motor dysfunction may be associated with the presence of anti-Sc170 and anti-U1snRNP autoantibodies and prevail in patients with cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy.     

Upper esophageal sphincter function during belching

We studied the mechanism of belching with specific attention to the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) in 14 normal volunteers. Belching occurred by the following sequence of events: lower esophageal sphincter relaxation; gastroesophageal gas reflux, recorded manometrically as a gastroesophageal common cavity phenomenon; UES relaxation; esophagopharyngeal gas reflux; and restoration of intraesophageal pressure to baseline by a peristaltic contraction. Upper esophageal sphincter relaxations comparable to those associated with belches were induced by abrupt esophageal distention with air boluses. In contrast, fluid boluses injected into the midesophageal body either had no effect on UES pressure or increased UES pressure. Thus, the UES responded to esophageal body distention in two distinct ways: abrupt relaxation in response to air boluses and pressure augmentation in response to fluid boluses. Mucosal anesthesia did not alter the UES response to esophageal boluses of gas or liquid thereby making it unlikely that these substances are differentiated by a mucosal receptor. Rapid distention of the proximal esophagus with a cylindrical balloon (15 cm long) elicited UES relaxation. These findings suggest that the rapidity and spatial pattern of esophageal distention, rather than discrimination of the type of material causing the distention, determines whether or not UES relaxation occurs.     

Comparison of effects of nifedipine,propantheline bromide,and the combination on esophageal motor function in normal volunteers

Both intracellular calcium ions and neural input are important in esophageal smooth muscle contraction. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of well-tolerated doses of the calcium-channel blocker, nifedipine (20 mg sublingually/buccally) with the anticholinergic, propantheline bromide (15 mg orally) and the combination of these two agents on esophageal motor function. Seven healthy volunteers underwent manometric evaluation after nifedipine, propantheline bromide, the combination, and placebo on different days. Lower esophageal sphincter pressure decreased significantly (P<0.05 vs basal and placebo) by 32% after nifedipine, but fell only 21% after propantheline bromide. After the combination lower esophageal sphincter pressure fell by 45% (P<0.05 vs basal and placebo and nifedipine alone). Contraction amplitude in the body of the esophagus decreased significantly (P<0.05 vs basal and placebo) by 26% after propantheline bromide, but fell only 11% after nifedipine. The combination led to a decrease of 37% in contraction amplitude, but this was not significantly different from that obtained with propantheline bromide alone. No drug or combination had any effect on other manometric parameters. These data show that in the normal subjects studied with the above doses: (1) nifedipine has a greater effect than propantheline bromide on the lower esophageal sphincter; (2) propantheline bromide has a greater effect than nifedipine on esophageal contraction amplitude; and (3) the combination of nifedipine and propantheline bromide has an enhanced effect on both lower esophageal sphincter pressure and esophageal contraction amplitude.     

Repetitive contractions of the upper esophageal body and sphincter in achalasia

This report describes repetitive contractions in the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) and the repetitive upper esophageal spontaneous contractions (RUESCs) of patients with achalasia and relates this activity to repetitive contractile activity (RCA) recorded in the more distal esophageal body, to intraesophageal pressure (IEP), and to lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure. Two hundred and sixteen consecutive esophageal motility studies from 156 achalasia patients were retrospectively assessed. RUESCs were found in 105 patients (67%) and 125 of 216 studies (58%). General features of the RUESC were (1) coincidence with simultaneous repetitive increases in pressure throughout the entire esophageal body; (2) amplitude of pressure increases tended to be higher in the proximal esophagus; (3) RUESC frequency was different than respiration, except for 6 cases where continuous, RUESC and RCA were synchronized with inspiration; and (4) RUESCs were positively associated with increased IEP, and with increased LES pressure (>40 mmHg). RCA in the esophageal body was uncommon without RUESC. It is concluded that (1) RUESCs are common in achalasia and appear to be closely linked to contractile activity in the upper esophageal body; (2) the close relationship of RUESC and RCA in the esophageal body to increased IEP and elevated LES pressure suggests that esophageal tone is high in these subjects; and (3) these findings indicate a potential mechanism for localization of some of the clinical symptoms to the retrosternal and suprasternal areas, for the inability to readily belch, and for the development of structural features such as a prominent cricopharyngeal bar.     

The effect of manometric assembly diameter on intraluminal esophageal pressure recording

Recent studies indicate that lower esophageal sphincter pressure is influenced by manometric assembly diameter. This study determines the effect of assembly diameter on both esophageal sphincter pressure and peristaltic pressure in the esophageal body. We performed esophageal manometric studies in 6 normal subjects using graded assembly diameters. High-fidelity recording was achieved by using a noncompliant catheter-infusion system. The results indicate that increases in assembly diameter cause significant increases in peristaltic pressure amplitudes and in resting sphincter pressure in both the smooth and striated muscle portions of the esophagus. This phenomenon is best explained by the length-tension characteristics of esophageal muscle, increased stretch causing greater contraction force.     

Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and manometry clarifies esophageal function abnormalities: study in 350 patients

BACKGROUND: Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and esophageal manometry (MII-EM) is a technique that uses an FDA-approved device allowing simultaneous evaluation of bolus transit (MII) in relation to pressure changes (EM). METHODS: During a 9-month period, beginning from July 2002 through March 2003, we prospectively performed combined MII-EM on all patients referred for esophageal function testing. Each patient received 10 liquid and 10 viscous swallows. Manometric findings were reported based on criteria described by Spechler and Castell for liquid swallows. MII findings were reported as having normal bolus transit if >/=80% (8/10) of liquid and >/=70% (7/10) of viscous swallows had complete bolus transit. RESULTS: Three-hundred fifty studies were evaluated from patients with a variety of symptoms having the following manometric diagnoses: normal manometry (125), achalasia (24), scleroderma (4), ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) (71), distal esophageal spasm (DES) (33), nutcracker esophagus (30), hypertensive lower esophageal sphincter (LES) (25), hypotensive LES (5), and poorly relaxing LES (33). None of the patients with achalasia and scleroderma had normal bolus transit. Fifty-one percent of patients with IEM and 55% of patients with DES had normal bolus transit while almost all (more than 95%) patients with normal esophageal manometry, nutcracker esophagus, poorly relaxing LES, hypertensive LES, and hypotensive LES had normal bolus transit. Dysphagia occurred most often in patients with incomplete bolus transit on MII testing. CONCLUSION: Esophageal body pressures primarily determine bolus transit with isolated LES abnormalities appearing to have little effect on esophageal function. MII clarifies functional abnormalities in patients with abnormal manometric studies.     

Effect of gastroesophageal reflux on esophageal speech

Gastroesophageal reflux has been incriminated as a factor-inhibiting acquisition of esophageal speech after laryngectomy. Fourteen proficient esophageal speakers and 10 nonproficient speakers underwent esophageal manometry, esophageal pH probe testing, and Bernstein acid perfusion testing. Additionally, 175 laryngectomized members of Lost Chord Clubs answered mailed questionnaires about the frequency of reflux symptoms. Nonproficient and proficient esophageal speakers had a similar frequency of gastroesophageal reflux by pH probe testing, esophageal mucosal acid sensitivity by Bernstein testing, lower esophageal sphincter pressures, and gastroesophageal reflux symptoms. Gastroesophageal reflux does not appear to be a major factor in preventing esophageal speech.     

Esophageal stimulation tests

Both pharmacological and mechanical stimulation tests are used to evaluate the motor function of the esophagus and its sphincters. The stimulation of the esophagus allows not only evaluation of basal motor parameters but gives also information about the capability of the organ to respond to defined stimuli. Pentagastrin and edrophonium have been used to stimulate the esophageal motor function mainly with the intension of revealing abnormal motility patterns. In the esophageal body, the administration of the compounds allows detection of motor abnormalities. In contrast to a pharmacological stimulation test, the response of the lower esophageal sphincter to mechanical stimulation with an increase in abdominal pressure-applied by leg raising or using an abdominal beltremains a controversials field. The conflict is due to the fact that some investigators postulate an atropine-sensitive or vagally mediated reflex, whereas others suggest a purely mechanical extrinsic compression of the intraabdominal portion of the esophagus. The latter explanation seems to be wrong due to the fact that during mechanical stimulation with intermittend abdominal compression the change in pressure in the LES exceeds the time of the mechanical stimulation. The results were obtained in healthy persons and in patients with different esophageal motility disorders. It was concluded, therefore, that an increase in abdominal pressure results in an adaptive pressure rise in the LES, which can be used to evaluate the lower esophageal sphincter in a more detailed and functional way. In the esophageal body abnormal motility patterns can be more distinctly provoked by inducing swallowing with a defined bolus. Wet swallows more frequently allow detection of esophageal motor dysfunction than dry swallows. The inflation of a balloon in the esophageal body is sometimes helpful in patients with noncardiac chest pain to correlate mechanical stress with esophageal related symptoms.     

Lower esophageal sphincter analysis using computerized manometry in patients with chagasic megaesophagus

Due to the introduction of computer technology into manometry laboratories, three-dimensional manometric images of the lower esophageal sphincter can be constructed based on radially oriented pressures, a method termed 'computerized axial manometry.' Calculation of the sphincter pressure vector volume using this method is superior to standard manometric techniques in assessing lower esophageal sphincter function in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and idiopathic achalasia. Despite similarities between idiopathic achalasia and chagasic esophagopathy found using clinical, radiological, and manometric studies, controversy around lower esophageal sphincter pressure persists. The goal of this study was to analyze esophageal motor disorders in Chagas' megaesophagus using computerized axial manometry. Twenty patients with chagasic megaesophagus (5 men, 15 women, and average age 50.1 years, range 17-64) were prospectively studied. For three-dimensional imaging construction of the lower esophageal sphincter, a low-complacency perfusion system and an eight-channel manometry probe with four radial channels placed in the same level were used. For probe traction, the continuous pull-through technique was used. Results showed that the lower esophageal sphincter of patients with chagasic megaesophagus have significantly elevated pressure, length, asymmetry, and vector volumes compared to those of normal volunteers (P < 0.05). Aperistalsis of the esophageal body waves was observed in all patients and contraction amplitude was lower than that in normal patients. We conclude that patients with chagasic megaesophagus have hypertonic lower esophageal sphincter and aperistalsis of the esophageal body.     

Esophageal manometry and radionuclide emptying in chronic alcoholics

Eighteen asymptomatic alcoholics, half with neuropathy, were studied within 3 days of drinking to evaluate the frequency, nature, and underlying causes of esophageal dysmotility. Ten were restudied after a month of sobriety. The mean lower esophageal sphincter pressure and esophageal contraction amplitude in alcoholics were significantly higher than controls. Radionuclide esophageal emptying was slower than controls. Abnormal motility studies included 9 patients with nutcracker esophagus and 5 patients with nonspecific motor disorder. After 1 mo of abstinence, 5 of 6 patients with nutcracker esophagus and one with nonspecific motor disorder became normal. Lower esophageal sphincter pressure and esophageal contraction amplitude also returned to normal. These abnormal findings were independent of neuropathy. One patient who had normal manometry and emptying had esophagitis. We demonstrated that esophageal dysfunction is common in alcoholics, even in the absence of esophagitis and neuropathy, suggesting that these do not play a major role in esophageal dysmotility. Nutcracker esophagus is a reversible and common manometric finding in asymptomatic alcoholics.     

Esophageal motility and gastric acid secretion in patients with Barrett's esophagus

Patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) usually have low resting lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure, and also have impaired esophageal body motility, with low amplitude and failed peristaltic contractions on swallowing being common. These motor abnormalities contribute to excessive esophageal acid exposure in patients with BE. However, gastric acid secretion is not different between patients with BE and reflux esophagitis.