Impact of advanced dialysis technology on the prevalence of dialysis‐related amyloidosis in long‐term maintenance dialysis patients

Dialysis‐related amyloidosis (DRA) is a unique type of amyloidosis (beta‐2 microglobulin) predominantly in end‐stage renal disease. Its clinical manifestations add to increased morbidity and reduced quality of life. There seems to be a relative risk reduction in DRA manifestations when hemodialysis (HD) patients are treated with advanced HD technology, but changes of the course of DRA are uncertain. The aim of our investigation was to evaluate the prevalence and severity of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) in long‐term dialysis patients receiving either conventional or high‐flux, online‐produced ultrapure dialysis fluid. The cross‐sectional study included 147 HD patients (at least 10 years). The definitive diagnosis of CTS was made histologically or by the coexistence of CTS with other radiological DRA manifestations (bone cysts, arthropathies). The two HD patient groups did not differ significantly in age at start of HD, gender, major co‐morbid diseases, anuria, and dialysis vintage. The conventional HD group had significantly higher circulating beta‐2 microglobulin and C‐reactive protein (CRP) levels. The prevalence of DRA was 68% for the conventional HD group and 28% for the advanced HD group. Duration of dialysis treatment was the only significant risk factor for the development of clinical DRA manifestations in both study groups, but CTS, bone cysts, or arthropathies occurred significantly earlier in conventional HD patients. The prevalence and severity of DRA have decreased with advances in dialysis technology during the last two decades, although its occurrence is simply delayed.     

Left ventricular mass index and aortic arch calcification score are independent mortality predictors of maintenance hemodialysis patients

To analyze predictive factors for all‐cause mortality, cardiovascular (CV) mortality, nonfatal CV events (CVE) in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients, and to compare the effects of standard hemodialysis (HD) and online hemodiafiltration (HDF) on these factors and outcomes. A total of 333 MHD patients were prospectively followed up for 50 ± 15 months and all‐cause death, CV death and CVE were registered. At the baseline, demographic, clinical, and laboratory data of the whole population were recorded. Then, patients were stratified into two groups according to the dialysis modalities, HD (n = 268) and HDF (n = 65). At the end of 6th month, clinical and laboratory data were recorded again. The predictive factors at baseline for all‐cause mortality, CV mortality, and CVE were analyzed by Cox regression. The effects of HD and HDF on these factors at the 6th month and long‐term outcomes were compared by t‐test and Kaplan–Meier method, respectively. Age, gender, left ventricular mass index (LVMI), aortic arch calcification score (AoACS), hemoglobin (Hb) <10 g/dL, and ferritin >500 ng/mL maintained independent associations with all‐cause mortality. C‐reactive protein (CRP), LVMI, AoACS, and Hb <10 g/dL were associated with CV mortality. Prior cardiovascular disease (CVD), AoACS and LVMI were independent predictors of nonfatal CVE. Higher body mass index (BMI), body weight, total serum cholesterol, Hb concentration, and lower CRP level, LVMI, and AoACS were found in patients on HDF at the end of the 6th month. Improved outcomes with longer survival time for all‐cause mortality, CV mortality, and CVE were found in HDF group. Age, gender, LVMI, AoACS, Hb, and ferritin were predictors of all‐cause mortality in MHD patients. CRP, LVMI, AoACS, and Hb were associated with CV mortality. Prior CVD, AoACS, and LVMI were independent predictors of nonfatal CVE. HDF could improve BMI, body weight, total serum cholesterol, Hb, CRP, LVMI, AoACS, and long‐term outcomes, including all‐cause mortality, CV mortality, and CVE.     

Does hemodiafiltration improve the removal of homocysteine?

High prevalence of hyperhomocysteinemia is common in hemodialysis (HD) patients and could contribute to worsen the cardiovascular risk. Beyond vitamin B status, dialysis modality itself could influence homocysteine (Hcy) levels. The objective was compare the reduction rate (RR) of Hcy and cysteine in stable dialyzed patients treated by standard HD or hemodiafiltration (HDF). Seventy‐five patients undergoing stable dialysis through standard high‐flux HD (n = 35) or HDF (n = 40) were included. Biological parameters were determined before and after a midweek dialysis session. Urea percent reduction per session and Kt/V index (K, body urea clearance, T, time of dialysis, and V, urea distribution volume), defined as a marker of dialysis efficacy, were similar between HD and HDF groups. By contrast, higher RR of beta2 microglobulin (β2m) was observed in HDF compared with HD (78.6 vs. 72.0%, respectively; P < 0.001). Likewise, higher RR of Hcy was obtained with HDF compared to HD (46.0 vs. 41.5%, respectively; P < 0.05), whereas the RR of cysteine was similar in both groups. Interestingly, a positive correlation between Hcy RR and urea Kt/V index was observed (r = 0.29, P < 0.05) and between Hcy RR and β2m RR (r = 0.45, P < 0.001). Time‐averaged concentration (TAC) of Hcy was lower with HDF compared with HD (17.8 vs. 19.1 μmol/L, respectively), although not significant. There was no difference in median Hcy according to dialysis modality for neither pre‐ nor postdialysis levels. Significant higher removal of Hcy was observed with HDF compared with standard HD, although urea Kt/V index was similar. Enhanced removal of middle molecules, such as β2m, could be involved in Hcy RR improvement with HDF.     

A Comparative Study of C‐Reactive Protein Plasma Levels in Patients on Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis

In dialysis patients, C‐reactive protein (CRP), a well‐recognized marker of inflammation, predicts mortality. Higher levels have been described in hemodialysis (HD) patients as compared with peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Our aim was to determine, based on CRP plasma levels, the degree of inflammation in HD patients using low‐permeability polysulfone membranes and relatively pure dialysate, and that in PD patients. A secondary objective was to study factors associated with hypoalbuminemia and inflammation in both populations. We studied 69 stable patients on dialysis (32 on HD and 37 on PD). The mean age was 69.9 ± 8.2 years, and the mean time on dialysis was 27 months. The two populations were comparable for overall and cardiovascular comorbidities. Nephelometry was used to measure CRP plasma levels (normal levels < 0.6 mg/dL). The Kt/V_urea, corrected for residual renal clearance, and the equivalent of protein nitrogen appearance (PNA) were also calculated. Of the patients studied, 53% showed CRP plasma levels higher than 0.6 mg/dL; in 36%, the levels were higher than 1 mg/dL. No significant differences in these percentages were noted between the two dialysis groups. Patients with CRP levels higher than 1 mg/dL showed lower serum albumin, iron, hemoglobin, and transferrin levels, and higher ferritin values and leukocyte counts. Under logistic regression analysis, CRP levels higher and lower than 1 mg/dL were significantly associated with serum albumin [p = 0.01; odds ratio (OR): 0.15], iron (p = 0.006; OR: 0.96), transferrin (p = 0.004; OR: 0.97), and hemoglobin (p = 0.02; OR: 0.67). Serum albumin levels were significantly lower in PD patients. Under regression analysis, serum albumin levels correlated with cholesterol (r: 0.25; p = 0.04), serum iron (r: 0.5; p = 0.0001), transferrin (r: 0.3; p = 0.015), ultrafiltration capacity (r: 0.42; p = 0.008), and CRP values above 0.6 mg/dL (r: –0.65; p = 0.001). In conclusion, the frequent elevation of CRP plasma levels observed in both HD and PD patients suggests the presence of a silent inflammatory state. Hemodialysis performed with biocompatible, low‐permeability membranes is not associated with higher CRP plasma levels than those seen in PD. In both groups, hypoalbuminemia is related to CRP level. Levels of serum albumin, slightly lower in PD patients, are also related to peritoneal ultrafiltration capacity.     

Hemodialysis‐induced acute pancreatitis secondary to kinked hemodialysis blood lines

Objective: Blood‐membrane interaction during hemodialysis may contribute to inflammatory process, which accelerates the development of atherosclerosis in maintenance hemodialysis patients (MHD). Vitamin E has been widely used against oxidative stress in MHD. One of the strategies for the utilization of vitamin E in MHD patients is the usage of vitamin E‐coated membrane dialyzer. We investigated the effects of vitamin E‐coated membrane dialyzer on serum C‐reactive protein and interleukin‐6, the biomarker of inflammation, compared to polysulfone membrane dialyzer. Methods: Vitamin E‐coated membrane dialyzer (1.5‐m² surface area) and synthetic polysulfone dialyzer (1.5‐m² surface area) were manipulated in a crossover clinical study for 24 weeks in 10 non‐diabetic MHD patients. Run‐in and wash‐out periods (Cellulose tri‐acetate) were performed for 4 weeks before the treatment. Pre‐ and post‐dialysis blood samples were taken at the begining and the end of each dialyzer period (12 weeks). High‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein (hs‐CRP) and interleukin‐6 (IL‐6) were examined. Results: Mean age of the patients was 54.9 years old. CRP and IL‐6 levels were similarly increased after dialysis in both groups (4.8 ± 0.7 and 37.2 ± 9.4, respectively). The CRP and IL‐6 level in vitamin E‐coated membrane dialyzer treatment were lower than in polysulfone treatment (5.0 ± 1.2, p < 0.008 and 67.2 ± 12.4, p < 0.04, respectively). Serum albumin, hemoglobin level, and white blood cell count were not affected by types of dialyzer membrane. Conclusions: In our study, hemodialysis stimulated the inflammation as the previous study. Vitamin E‐coated membrane dialyzer may diminish the inflammatory process in MHD patients and may also prevent further atherosclerosis.     

Positive association between plasma levels of oxidized low‐density lipoprotein and myeloperoxidase after hemodialysis in patients with diabetic end‐stage renal disease

End‐stage renal disease (ESRD) patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) have a high prevalence of cardiovascular events. Low‐density lipoprotein (LDL) in dialysis patients has been shown to be susceptible to in vitro peroxidation; therefore, oxidized‐LDL (ox‐LDL) could be generated in these patients. Moreover, myeloperoxidase (MPO) released from activated neutrophils may play a role in the induction of LDL oxidation. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between plasma ox‐LDL levels, plasma MPO levels, and serum high‐sensitivity C‐reactive protein (hs‐CRP) levels during initial HD in patients with diabetic ESRD. Patients (n = 28) had serial venous blood samples drawn before and after HD at the initial, second, and third sessions. Plasma ox‐LDL levels were measured using a specific monoclonal antibody (DLH3), and plasma MPO levels were measured using an enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay kit. Plasma ox‐LDL levels and MPO levels after a single HD session increased significantly (ox‐LDL, P < 0.005; MPO, P < 0.0001) compared with levels before that HD session. However, the increase was transient since the levels returned to pre‐HD session levels. Additionally, plasma MPO levels showed a positive correlation with plasma ox‐LDL levels during HD (R = 0.62, P = 0.0029). No significant change was observed in serum hs‐CRP levels before and after each HD session. This study demonstrates that plasma MPO levels are directly associated with plasma ox‐LDL levels in diabetic ESRD patients during initial HD. These findings suggest a pivotal role for MPO and ox‐LDL in the progression and acceleration of atherosclerosis in patients undergoing HD.     

Effect of hemodiafiltration with endogenous reinfusion on overt idiopathic chronic inflammation in maintenance hemodialysis patients: A multicenter longitudinal study

Chronic inflammation is widely diffuse in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients and is associated with poor survival. Hemodiafiltration with endogenous reinfusion (HFR) is a dialysis technique, highly biocompatible, able to adsorb proinflammatory cytokines and to decrease amino acids and antioxidants loss. These features could be helpful in MHD patients affected by idiopathic chronic inflammation, but this issue remains to be elucidated. We performed a multicenter longitudinal study to assess the effect of the switching from bicarbonate HD to HFR in patients with serum C‐reactive Protein (CRP) > 5 mg/L coupled with albumin <4.0 g/dL in the last 6 months. We enrolled 24/176 (14%) patients, of which 20 patients were assessed at 4 months and 18 completed the study. We excluded 11 patients with evident causes of inflammation. At baseline, serum levels of CRP (18.7[7.0–39.4] mg/L) and albumin (3.5[3.3–3.7] g/dL) were significantly correlated (r = ?0.49; P = 0.028). The effect on CRP and albumin was almost evident in the first 4 months and remained stable until to eighth month. A strict correlation (R = ?0.49; 0.040) between percentage change of CRP (?35%) and albumin (+14%) after 8 months of HFR. These effects were associated with the reduction of IL‐6, IL‐1β, and TNF‐α and the increment of pre‐albumin and leptin, whereas the serum levels of Branched Chain Amino Acid (BCAA) remained unchanged. In MHD patients affected by idiopathic chronic inflammation the switching from BHD to HFR is associated with improvement of inflammation. Whether these favorable effects may modify the outcomes of these high‐risk patients needs to be confirmed by studies ad hoc.     

Platelet‐to‐lymphocyte ratio better predicts inflammation than neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio in end‐stage renal disease patients

Neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was introduced as a potential marker to determine inflammation in end‐stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. Recently, platelet‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and NLR were found to positively correlated with inflammatory markers including tumor necrosis factor‐α (TNF‐α) and interleukin (IL)‐6 in cardiac and noncardiac patients. Data regarding PLR and its association with inflammation are lacking in hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. Hence, we aimed to determine the relationship between PLR, NLR, and inflammation in ESRD patients. This was a cross‐sectional study involving 62 ESRD patients (29 females, 33 males; mean age, 49.6 ± 14.6 years) receiving PD or HD for ≥6 months in the Dialysis Unit of Necmettin Erbakan University. PLR, NLR, C‐reactive protein, TNF‐α, IL‐6 levels were measured. PLR, NLR, serum high sensitive C‐reactive protein, IL‐6, and TNF‐α levels were significantly higher in PD patients when compared with HD patients. ESRD patients with PLR ≥ 140 had significantly higher NLR, IL‐6, and TNF‐α levels when compared to patients with PLR < 139. In the bivariate correlation analysis, PLR was positively correlated with NLR, IL‐6, and TNF‐α in this population. When we compared the association of PLR and NLR with IL‐6 (r = 0.371, P = 0.003 vs. r = 0.263, P = 0.04, respectively) and TNF‐α (r = 0.334, P = 0.008 vs. r = 0.273, P = 0.032, respectively), PLR was found to be superior to NLR in terms of inflammation in ESRD patients. Simple calculation of PLR can predict inflammation better than NLR in ESRD patients.     

Does online hemodiafiltration lead to reduction in trace elements and vitamins?

Hemodiafiltration (HDF) has been reported to improve nutritional intake, but as it increases convective losses, it could also increase micronutrient loss. We prospectively audited the effect of HDF on vitamin B12, zinc and selenium. Thirty‐four patients dialyzing (T/Th/Sa) switched to HDF, and 44 dialyzing (M/W/F) remained on high‐flux hemodialysis (HD) and were followed for 12 months. Dialysis adequacy, weight, hemoglobin, and serum albumin did not differ between the groups and did not change over 12 months’ follow up. Similarly, vitamin B12 did not differ: HDF, 443 (325–682) ng/mL HD vs. 478 (327–690) ng/mL HDF; 6 months, 513 (351–664) ng/mL vs. 460 (379–647) ng/mL; or 12 months, 444 (317–617) ng/mL vs. 492 (323–644) ng/mL. And no patient had subnormal values. Folate levels, in those not taking supplements, were also stable (start, 6.2 ± 0.7 μg/L HD vs. 7.2 ± 1.0 μg/L HDF; 12 months, 6.5 ± 0.9 μg/L vs. 10.9 ± 2.4 μg/L). Serum zinc was subnormal in 50% prior to switching to HDF, 10.4 ± 0.4 μmol/L, but did not fall with HDF 10.2 ± 0.3 μmol/L; similarly, selenium was low in 49% prior to switching to HDF, 0.77 ± 0.06 μmol/L, but remained stable on HDF, 0.82 ± 0.06 μmol/L. Although HDF adds convective clearance to standard hemodialysis, it does not lead to a reduction in vitamin B12, folate, zinc, or selenium. However, half of this dialysis cohort had low levels of both zinc and selenium.     

Endotoxins and inflammation in hemodialysis patients

Long‐term endotoxin challenge may promote frequent complications in dialysis patients, namely malnutrition, chronic inflammation, and atherosclerosis, which are recognized as the so‐called MIA syndrome. Circulating soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule‐1 (sVCAM‐1) levels may be used to determine the stage of atherosclerosis. This study aimed to assess endotoxin level in hemodialysis (HD) patients and its role in inducing inflammation. The study was conducted on 50 HD patients, chosen from four dialysis centers in Alexandria. Serum blood samples were collected for the determination of albumin and C‐reactive protein (CRP), and whole blood samples were used for the measurement of hemoglobin level. A heparinized whole blood sample was taken postdialysis for endotoxin assay by limulus amebocyte lysate test, and in addition to sVCAM‐1 was estimated using enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay. The mean endotoxin level was 76.30 pg/mL;80% exhibited values higher than 60 pg/mL. Half the studied patients had CRP values that exceeded the upper limit of the laboratory reference range (<6.0 mg/L). A statistically significant correlation was found between endotoxin and CRP levels (r = 0.47, P = 0.001). The mean pre‐HD level of VCAM was 1851.00 ng/mL, while the mean post‐HD level was 2829.00 ng/mL with statistically significant correlation (r = 0.354, P = 0.012) and it also correlated significantly with endotoxin as well as CRP levels. Endotoxemia may play an important role in the aggravation of endothelial dysfunction in HD patients as indicated by the post‐HD rise in sVCAM‐1.     

Clinical Consequences of Intermittent Elevation of C-Reactive Protein Level in Hemodialysis Patients

The presence of persistently high C‐reactive protein (CRP) levels is well known to be associated with a state of inflammation, malnutrition, and erythropoietin resistance in hemodialysis (HD) population. Meanwhile, a substantial group of patients present with intermittent elevations of CRP levels, and its clinical consequences are unclear. We designed this study to compare the inflammatory and nutritional parameters and erythropoietin requirements in HD patients with persistent or intermittent CRP elevation and those with CRP levels in without. We included 100 HD patients [age: 48.4 ± 14.3 years; HD duration: 69.3 ± 49.0 months (minimum 12 months)]. The 6‐month retrospective clinical and laboratory data were retrieved from the patient records, and those with chronic inflammatory disease, malignancy, infectious complications, and surgery were excluded. The monthly determined CRP levels (at least 6 for each patient) were reviewed, and the patients were grouped according to their CRP levels as those with persistent (group 1), intermittent (at least one level of CRP 10 mg/L) (group 2), and those with CRP in normal ranges set by the laboratory (group 3). We compared the fibrinogen, ICAM‐1, VCAM‐1, albumin, prealbumin, normalized protein catabolic rate (nPCR), interdialytic weight gain (IDWG), and rHuEPO/kg/Hct results of the patient groups. The patient groups revealed significant differences in terms of fibrinogen (p < 0.001), albumin (p < 0.0001), prealbumin (p < 0.007), ICAM‐1 (p < 00.2) levels and nPCR (p < 0.03), IDWG (p < 0.02), and rHuEPO/kg/Hct (p < 0.03) values. Group 2 presented to be in risk of inflammation and malnutrition with a decrease in albumin levels and nPCR and presence of rHUEpo resistance when compared to patients in group 3. We conclude that, similar to HD patients with persistently high CRP levels, those with intermittent elevation of CRP must also be considered to be in a state of chronic inflammatory response associated with malnutrition and erythropoietin resistance. This signifies the importance of regulatory monitoring of CRP in HD population.     

Phosphate removal model: an observational study of low-flux dialyzers in conventional hemodialysis therapy

Precise assessing phosphate removal by hemodialysis (HD) is important to improve phosphate control in patients on maintenance HD. We reported a simple noninvasive model to estimate phosphate removal within a 4‐hour HD. One hundred sixty‐five patients who underwent HD 4 hours per session using low‐flux dialyzers made of polysulfone (1.2 m²) or triacetate (1.3 m²) were enrolled. Blood flows varied from 180 to 300 mL/min. Effluent dialysate samples were collected during the 4‐hour HD treatment to measure the total phosphate removal. Predialysis levels of serum phosphate, potassium, hematocrit, intact parathyroid hormone, total carbon dioxide (TCO₂), alkaline phosphatase, clinical and dialysis characteristics were obtained. One hundred thirty‐five observations were randomly selected for model building and the remaining 30 for model validation. Total amount of phosphate removal within the 4‐hour HD was mostly 15–30 mmol. A primary model (model 1) predicting total phosphate removal was Tpo₄ = 79.6 × C₄₅ (mmol/L) ? 0.023 × age (years) + 0.065 × weight (kg) ? 0.12 × TCO₂ (mmol/L) + 0.05 × clearance (mL/min) ? 3.44, where C₄₅ was phosphate concentration in spent dialysate measured at the 45 minute of HD and clearance was phosphate clearance of dialyzer in vitro conditions offered by manufacturer's data sheet. Since the parameter TCO₂ needed serum sample for measurement, we further derived a noninvasive model (model 2):Tpo₄ = 80.3 × C₄₅ ? 0.024 × age + 0.07 × weight + 0.06 × clearance ? 8.14. Coefficient of determination, root mean square error, and residual plots showed the appropriateness of two models. Model validation further suggested good and similar predictive ability of them. This study derived a noninvasive model to predict phosphate removal. It applies to patients treated by 4‐hour HD under similar conditions.     

The level of C‐reactive protein in chronic hemodialysis patients: A comparative study between patients with noninfected catheters and arteriovenous fistula in two large Gulf hemodialysis centers

Hemodialysis (HD) patients have greater morbidity and mortality when they have a central venous catheter (CVC) rather than an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) access. Inflammation associated with dialysis catheter use and resultant higher C‐reactive protein (CRP) levels could have an independent adverse effect on patient outcomes. In this prospective study, we investigated whether HD catheters induce inflammation independent of infection. We compared the mean levels of the inflammatory marker (CRP) in 67 patients on maintenance HD using noninfected catheters with 86 HD patients using AVFs at Prince Salman Center for Kidney Diseases, Saudi Arabia (KSA), and Jahra Hospital, Kuwait, who met our inclusion criteria. C‐reactive protein levels were measured every 2 months over a period of 6 months using immunoturbidimetric assay. One hundred fifty‐three patients on maintenance HD for more than 6 months were included in the study, with mean age of 52.19 ± 16.06 years; 66% were males and 34% were females. Serial levels of mean CRP were statistically and significantly higher in group with noninfected catheters (1.33, 1.24, and 1.10 mg/dL) compared to those with AVFs (0.65, 0.59, and 0.68 mg/dL) with P value of 0.000. In our study, we found no relation between CRP level and age, sex, hemoglobin, albumin, calcium, phosphorus, and iPTH level in both groups. Hemodialysis patients with a catheter have a heightened state of inflammation independent of infection, and thus our study supports the avoidance of catheters and a timely conversion to AVFs with catheter removal.     

Effect of a hydrogen (H2)‐enriched solution on the albumin redox of hemodialysis patients

Elevated oxidative stress (OS) is associated with severe cardiovascular disease and premature death among patients treated with hemodialysis (HD). Oxidative stress is enhanced by contact between blood and dialysis membranes during HD sessions. This study aimed to clarify whether hydrogen (H₂), which is a known antioxidant, is capable of suppressing increased OS induced during HD sessions. Eight patients on regular HD treatment were studied. Two HD sessions were performed in a cross‐over design trial using standard and hydrogen‐enriched solutions (mean of 50 p.p.b. H₂; H₂‐HD). Blood samples were obtained from the inlet and outlet of the dialyzer during HD to determine changes in plasma levels of glutathione, hydrogen peroxide, and albumin redox state as a marker of OS. Comparison of inlet and outlet blood revealed significant decreases in total glutathione and reduced glutathione, as well as significant increases in hydrogen peroxide in both HD treatments. However, the mean proportion of reversibly oxidized albumin in outlet serum was significantly lower than that in inlet serum following the H₂‐HD session, whereas no significant changes were found in the standard solution session, suggesting that “intra‐dialyzer” OS is reduced by H₂‐HD. In conclusion, the application of H₂‐enriched solutions could ameliorate OS during HD.     

On‐line hemodiafiltration at home

Survival with online hemodiafiltration (OL‐HDF) is higher than with hemodialysis; frequent hemodialysis has also improved survival and quality of life. Home hemodialysis facilitates frequent therapy. We report our experience with 2 patients with stage 5 CKD who started home hemodialysis with OL‐HDF in November 2016. After a training period at the hospital, they started home hemodialysis with OL‐HDF after learning how to manage dialysis monitors and how to administer water treatment. We used the “5008‐home” (FMC^©) monitor, and the Acqua C^© (Fresenius Medical Care) for water treatment. Water conductivity was always checked before and during dialysis sessions and was always 2.5 to 3 mS/cm. Water cultures always fulfilled the criteria for ultrapurity. As far as we know, this is the first report on patients receiving OL‐HDF at home. The technique proved to be safe and valid for renal replacement therapy and transfers the benefits of hospital convective therapy to the home setting. Future data will enable us to determine whether survival has also improved.     

Phosphate binders and metabolic acidosis in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis—sevelamer hydrochloride,calcium carbonate,and bixalomer

The serum bicarbonate (HCO₃^–) levels are decreased in chronic hemodialysis (HD) patients treated with sevelamer hydrochloride (SH). We assessed the effects of bixalomer on the chronic metabolic acidosis in these patients. We examined 12 of the 122 consecutive Japanese patients with end‐stage renal disease on HD, who orally ingested a dose of SH (≥2250 mg), and an arterial blood gas analysis and biochemical analysis were performed before HD. Patients whose serum HCO₃^– levels were under 18 mmol/L were changed from SH to the same dose of bixalomer. A total of 12 patients were treated with a large amount of SH. Metabolic acidosis (a serum HCO₃^– level under 18 mmol/L) was found in eight patients. These patients were also treated with or without small dose of calcium carbonate (1.2 ± 1.1 g). The dose of SH was changed to that of bixalomer. After 1 month, the serum HCO₃^– levels increased from 16.3 ± 1.4 to 19.6 ± 1.7 mmol/L (P < 0.05). Metabolic acidosis was not observed in four patients (serum HCO₃^– level: 20.3 ± 0.7 mmol/L) likely because they were taking 3 g of calcium carbonate with SH. In the present study, the development of chronic metabolic acidosis was induced by HCl containing phosphate binders, such as SH, and partially ameliorated by calcium carbonate, then subsequently improved after changing the treatment to bixalomer.     

Arterial Hypertension Is Associated with Increased Serum Lipoprotein(a) Levels in End‐Stage Renal Disease Patients

In addition to disorders in lipoprotein metabolism, several other factors are involved in the development of atherosclerotic changes in end‐stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. One of these is arterial hypertension. We evaluated serum lipids—total cholesterol (TC), triglycerides (TG), apolipoproteins (A_I , A _II , B, E), lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)]—in 109 ESRD patients on dialysis [46 on hemodialysis (HD); 63 on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD)] and in 45 hyperlipidemic patients without renal failure (HL group). Dialysis patients were divided in two groups. Group A included 42 hypertensive patients (mean age: 62.3 ± 15.5 years) whose blood pressure (BP) was satisfactorily controlled with anti‐hypertensive medications. Group B included 67 non hypertensive patients (mean age: 66.6 ± 11.9 years). Levels of Lp(a) were significantly higher in both the HD (p = 0.001) and the CAPD (p < 0.05) patients as compared with the HL group. When the HD and CAPD groups were divided into hypertensive and non hypertensive patients, Lp(a) levels were significantly higher in the hypertensive patients; this difference was not observed among non renal failure patients. These results indicate that arterial hypertension is associated with elevated Lp(a) serum levels in ESRD patients undergoing either HD or CAPD.     

Overview of clinical studies in hemodiafiltration: What do we need now ?

Despite several technical advances in dialysis treatment modalities and a better patient care management including correction of anemia, suppression of secondary hyperparathyroidism, lipid and oxidative stress profiles improvement, the morbidity and the mortality of dialysis patients still remain still elevated. Recent prospective interventional trials in hemodialysis (HEMO study and 4D study) were not very conclusive in showing any significant improvement in dialysis patient outcomes. High-efficiency convective therapies, such as online hemodiafiltration (HDF), are claimed to be superior to conventional diffusive hemodialysis (HD) in improving the dialysis efficacy and in reducing intradialytic morbidity and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in dialysis patients. The aim of this report was, first, to review the evidence-based facts tending to prove the superiority of HDF vs. HD in terms of efficacy and tolerance, and, second, to analyze the needs to prove the clinical superiority of HDF in terms of reducing morbidity and all-cause mortality of dialysis patients. A systematic review of studies comparing HDF and HD has been performed in the microbiological safety of online production, the solute removal capacity of small and medium-size uremic toxins, and its implication in the reduction of the bioactive dialysis system vs. patient interaction. Major planned randomized international studies comparing HDF and HD in terms of morbidity and mortality have been reviewed. To conclude, it is thought that these long-term prospective randomized trials will clarify on a scientific evidence-based level the putative beneficial role of high-efficiency HDF modalities on dialysis patient outcomes.     

Enhanced solute removal with intermittent, in-center, 8-hour nocturnal hemodialysis

Advances in the dialysis technique and increasing urea Kt/V have not improved outcomes for end‐stage renal disease patients maintained on hemodialysis (HD) therapy. Attention has, thus, focused on enhancing solute removal via prolonged HD sessions. A reduction in the serum levels of phosphorus and β‐2‐microglobulin (B2M) with longer HD treatments has been linked to improved patient outcomes. We have shown that serum phosphorus levels are significantly lowered in patients maintained on thrice‐weekly, in‐center, 8‐hour nocturnal HD performed at a blood flow rate of 400 mL/min. The kinetics of this modality were examined. A total of 8 patients participated in the study (age 45±7 years). Serum creatinine levels decreased from 9.2±1.9 to 3.0±1.0 mg/dL at 8 hours while serum phosphorus decreased from 5.7±1.9 to 2.5±0.7 mg/dL at 8 hours. The initial decrease from predialysis values to 1 hour after the start of HD was significant for both creatinine (P<0.0001) and phosphorus (P<0.001). Serum B2M decreased from 26.8±5.5 mg/L predialysis to 14.9±7.0 mg/L at 8 hours (P<0.01). Dialysate‐side clearances of phosphorus and creatinine were 136±13 and 143±27 cm³/min, respectively. Phosphorus clearances were steadily maintained during the 8‐hour session. A total of 904±292 mg of phosphorus was removed during the 8‐hour treatment, with 501±174 mg (55%) removed during the first 4 hours and the remaining 45% continuously removed during the latter one‐half of the session. The overall calculated B2M clearance was 55.1±40.3 cm³/min using the immediate post‐B2M value and 28.4±34.2 mg/L using the 30‐minute postdialysis value for the calculation. Serum levels of phosphorus and B2M decrease dramatically during an 8‐hour session. Future studies are necessary to determine whether the enhanced solute removal with longer HD sessions translates into an improved outcome for HD patients.     

Reprocessing high‐flux polysulfone dialyzers does not negatively impact solute removal in short‐daily online hemodiafiltration

There are no studies evaluating the impact of dialyzer reprocessing on solute removal in short‐daily online hemodiafiltration (OL‐HDF). Our aim was to evaluate the impact of dialyzer reuse on solute removal in daily OL‐HDF and compare with that in high‐flux short‐daily hemodialysis (SDH). Fourteen patients undergoing a SDH program were included. Pre‐dialysis and post‐dialysis blood samples and effluent dialysate were collected in the 1st, 7th, and 13th dialyzer uses in SDH sessions and in daily OL‐HDF sessions. Directly quantified small solute (urea, phosphorus, creatinine, and uric acid) total mass removal (TM_DQ) and clearance (K_DQ) were similar when the 1st, 7th, and 13th dialyzer SDH uses were compared with the 1st, 7th, and 13th daily OL‐HDF uses. TM_DQ and K_DQ of small solutes were similar among analyzed dialyzer uses in SDH sessions and in daily OL‐HDF sessions. β₂‐Microglobulin TM_DQ and K_DQ were statistically higher in daily OL‐HDF dialyzer uses than in the respective SDH uses. There was no difference in β₂‐microglobulin TM_DQ and K_DQ among dialyzer uses in daily OL‐HDF sessions or in SDH sessions. In daily OL‐HDF, albumin loss was significantly different among dialyzer uses (P < 0.001), being lower in the 7th and 13th dialyzer uses than in the first use. Dialyzer reprocessing did not impair solute extraction in daily OL‐HDF. β₂‐Microglobulin removal was greater in daily OL‐HDF than in SDH sessions, without significant differences in other solutes extraction. There was a significant reduction in intradialytic albumin loss with dialyzer reprocessing in daily OL‐HDF sessions.