Immunosuppression in renal transplantation: Long-term clinical trial of a double versus triple therapy regimen

Summary: Sixty-nine renal allograft recipients were randomized to two immunosuppressive regimens: 35 patients received cyclosporine A and prednisolone (PC) while 34 patients received low dose cyclosporine A, prednisolone and short term azathioprine (PCA). the data of 66 patients (34 in PC and 32 in PCA groups) were analysed. the median follow-up periods were 62 months for the PC group and 60 months for the PCA group. There was no difference in graft survival between the two groups but five patients died in the PC group compared to none in the PCA group (graft survival: 88 vs 90% at 1 year and 82 vs 82% at 5 years, P = not significant at any time point; patient survival: 90 vs 100% at 1 year and 88 vs 100% at 5 years, P = 0.05 at 5 years). There was a trend for patients in the PCA group to develop earlier and more frequent rejections (not significant; P = 0.106 and P = 0.062, respectively). There were also more episodes of acute cyclosporine A nephrotoxicity and cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in the PC group. the mean serum creatinine at 5 years was significantly higher in the PCA group when compared to the PC group (179.8 ± 76.5 μmol/L vs 154.7 ± 41.0 μmol/L; P =0.05). We found that both therapeutic regimens were effective in preventing renal allograft rejections. However, double therapy was associated with higher patient mortality secondary to infection. Patients on triple therapy, on the other hand, were more prone to develop rejections in the early post-transplant period and were associated with less favourable renal function in the long run.     

Outcomes of transplants from patients with small renal tumours,live unrelated donors and dialysis wait‐listed patients

We report the outcomes of renal transplant patients (n = 43) who received grafts from donors (n = 41) with small (<3 cm) renal tumours removed before transplantation covering the period from May 1996 to September 2007. Patient and graft survival were compared with the outcomes of conventional live unrelated transplants (LURTs) (n = 120) and to patient survival on the transplant waiting list for those who did not receive a kidney during this period (n = 153). Patient survival at 1, 3 and 5 years were 92%, 88% and 88% for recipients of tumourectomized kidneys (TKs), 99%, 97% and 97% for LURTs, and 98%, 92% and 74% for dialysis patients waiting for a deceased donor kidney (log rank score 10.4, P = 0.005). One patient experienced a local tumour recurrence at 9 years following transplantation. This patient declined intervention and is currently under active surveillance. Transplantation of tumourectomized kidneys from patients with small, localized, incidentally detected renal tumours results in similar outcomes to conventional LURTs and confers a significant survival advantage for patients who would otherwise be unable to receive a transplant.     

Does timing of post‐renal transplant diuresis affect graft survival in live‐donor renal transplants?

Study Type – Prognosis (case series)
Level of Evidence 4 What’s known on the subject? and What does the study add? Delayed graft function had an adverse impact upon graft survival in deceased kidney transplantation. The current study provides evidence of a similar effect in an exclusive live donor renal recipient population.

OBJECTIVE

To study the effect of timing of diuresis on short and long term graft survival in live‐donor (LD) renal transplants.

METHODS

Between 1976 and 2005, 1747 consecutive LD renal transplants were performed in a single institution. Patients were classified according to timing of diuresis after vascular de‐clamping; group 1 included patients with diuresis within 10 min; group 2 started diuresis between 10 and 60 min after de‐clamping; group 3 started diuresis between 1 and 24 h after de‐clamping; and group 4 started diuresis >24 h after de‐clamping. Patients’ data were stored on an electronic database and were reviewed for risk factors and clinical relevance of timing of diuresis.

RESULTS

Groups 1–4 comprised 1598 (91.5%), 87 (5%), 44 (2.5%) and 18 (1%) patients, respectively. By multivariate analysis, vascular thrombosis was the significant risk factor for delayed diuresis. Delayed diuresis was significantly associated with the occurrence of acute tubular necrosis (ATN), and acute and chronic rejection. Graft and patient survival rates were significantly affected by the timing of diuresis. The 1‐year graft survival rates were 93.8, 83.0, 83.6 and 55.6%, and the 5‐year graft survival rates were 77.4, 59.4, 69.4 and 35.7% in groups 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively (P < 0.001). The 1‐year patient survival rates were 96.5, 84.4, 90.7 and 61.1% and the 5‐year patient survival rates were 87.1, 72.0, 78.1 and 52.4% in groups 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Delayed diuresis is a rare event after LD renal transplantation, which has an adverse effect on short‐ and long‐term graft and patient survival.     

Pancreas transplantation with pancreaticocystostomy and quadruple immunosuppression

Forty-three whole-pancreas transplantations with pancreaticocystostomy were performed. Eighteen patients received pancreas transplants after previously receiving living-related kidney transplants, 18 patients received simultaneous kidney and pancreas transplants, and seven patients received pancreas transplants after previously receiving cadaver kidney transplants. All patients were immunosuppressed with quadruple immunosuppression including antilymphocyte globulin, prednisone, cyclosporine, and azathioprine. Overall graft survival for pancreas transplants is 73.1%. In the group with pancreas after living-related kidney, 1-year graft survival was 50% for the pancreas and 95.4% for the kidney. In the pancreas after cadaver kidney group, pancreas and kidney survival rates were 100% at 1 year, and in the simultaneous pancreas and kidney group, pancreas 1-year graft survival was 87.5% and kidney transplant survival was 93.8%. Overall patient survival at 1-year is 95.6%. Technical complications occurred in 21 patients. These included wound infections, intra-abdominal abscess formation, bleeding, and disruption of the pancreaticocystostomy. We believe that pancreas transplantation can now be performed with acceptable graft and patient survival.     

Living related and unrelated donors for kidney transplantation. A 28-year experience.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to analyze a single center's 28-year experience with 1000 living donor transplants. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The number of potential renal transplant recipients far exceeds the number of cadaveric donors. For this reason, living related donors (LRDs) and, more recently, living unrelated donors (LURDs) have been used to decrease the cadaveric donor shortage. METHODS: From November 15, 1966, until August 5, 1994, 1000 living donor transplants were performed; 906 were living related and 94 were living unrelated transplants. Results were divided into precyclosporine (1966-1986, era I) and cyclosporine (1986-1994, era II) eras. Patient and graft survivals were compared between diabetic and nondiabetic recipients, between LRDs and LURDs, and according to human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matching. Donor mortality, morbidity, and postoperative renal function were also analyzed. RESULTS: The 5-, 10-, and 20-year graft survivals were 78.8%, 64.8%, and 43.4%, respectively. Patient and graft survival improved in era II (patient = 87.0% vs. 81.7%, p = 0.03; graft = 72.9% vs. 67.7%, p = 0.04). Nondiabetic patient and graft survivals were better than diabetic patient survivals in both eras. However, diabetic patient survival improved in era II (78.0% vs. 66.9%, p = 0.04). In era II, HLA-identical recipients had better graft survival than haploidentical or mismatched recipients (91.7% vs. 67.3% and 66.1%, p = 0.01). No difference between haploidentical LRDs and LURDs was seen. One donor death occurred in 1970, and 17% of donors developed postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: Living related and unrelated renal donation continues to be an important source of kidneys for patients with end-stage renal disease.     

Impact of human leukocyte antigen matching in liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) compatibilities are beneficial in the setting of kidney transplantation but have demonstrated inconclusive results after liver transplantation. On the basis of recent controversial reports, the authors analyzed the impact of HLA matching in their patients after liver transplantation under modern immunosuppressive drug regimens and new HLA typing techniques with respect to outcome and adverse immunologic events. METHODS: Data from 924 transplants with complete donor-recipient HLA typing were retrospectively analyzed. Immunosuppression was commenced as either cyclosporine A- or tacrolimus-based therapy in different protocols. The follow-up period ranged from 1 to 144.8 months (median, 66 months). RESULTS: The actuarial graft survival was 88% after 1 year and 78.7% after 5 years and was similar in tacrolimus- and cyclosporine A-treated patients. However, cyclosporine A-treated patients underwent significantly more rejection episodes. The number of HLA compatibilities had no influence on graft survival, whereas the number of acute rejections was significantly less in transplants with more HLA compatibilities (P<0.05). Graft survival tended to be improved in patients with chronic hepatitis B and more HLA compatibilities (P=0.05). In contrast, graft survival in transplants for primary sclerosing cholangitis was significantly impaired in the presence of one or two HLA-DR compatibilities (P<0.05). In addition, in autoimmune hepatitis, survival tended to be lower in the presence of more HLA compatibilities (P=0.1). Overall graft survival or frequency of adverse immunologic events was not influenced by any specific donor-recipient HLA allele. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated fewer acute rejections in transplants with more HLA compatibilities. However, in liver transplantation, a more specific investigation of HLA typing may be necessary, because in some indications HLA antigens play a role in the nature of the disease. Therefore, recurrence of autoimmune disease may be more severe in patients sharing HLA antigens.     

Long-Term Survival of Kidneys Transplanted from Live A2 Donors to O and B Recipients

The long-term outcome of kidneys transplanted from blood group A(2) live donors into blood group O or B candidates is not known. From 1986 through 2006, we transplanted eight blood group O patients and one blood group B patient with kidneys from blood group A(2) live donors. Immunosuppression was no different for these patients than for ABO-compatible recipients. All patients received methylprednisolone, cyclosporine or tacrolimus and azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil with or without antibody induction (monoclonal or polyclonal). Of the nine live-donor A(2) to O and B transplants performed, seven grafts remain functioning. One of those seven was lost to follow-up at 9.2 years with a functioning kidney. Of the remaining six patients, length of follow-up is 10.4, 6.5, 5.3, 4, 2.1 and 1 years. Of the two patients who lost their grafts, one died with a functioning graft (DWFG) at 8.8 years and one lost his graft at 13.2 years due to noncompliance with immunosuppression. These data show that good long-term graft survival can be expected in live-donor A(2) to O and B transplantation despite some of those patients experiencing the type of clinical problems seen with ABO-compatible transplants.     

A randomized controlled trial of cyclosporine withdrawal in renal-transplant recipients: 15-year results

BACKGROUND: In renal transplantation, the immunosuppressive efficacy of cyclosporine is counterbalanced by its nephrotoxicity. Although cyclosporine improves short-term graft survival, its long-term effects are unclear. METHODS: Recipients of first cadaver renal transplants were randomized into three groups between 1983 and 1986: azathioprine and prednisolone alone (AP, n = 158), long term cyclosporine alone (Cy, n = 166), and short-term cyclosporine followed by azathioprine and prednisolone (CyAP, n = 165). All groups received methylprednisolone induction. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in patient survival at 15 years (48 vs. 56 vs. 51%, P = 0.14), and 15-year graft survival (censored for death) in those patients in the CyAP group (47 vs. 44 vs. 59%, P = 0.06) was not significantly different statistically. When deaths or graft losses before 12 months were censored, the differences in 15-year graft survival between the groups were significant (58%, 51%, 70%, P = 0.01). The CyAP group also had lower mean serum creatinine at all time points beyond 3 months posttransplant out to 10 years (143 vs. 169 vs. 131 micromoles/L, P = 0.04). Per protocol analysis, after censoring patients at change in therapy, increased the observed differences in 15-year graft survival between the groups (54 vs. 38 vs. 65%, P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Survival and function of first cadaveric kidney transplants is improved by use of short-term cyclosporine followed by azathioprine and prednisolone. Long-term cyclosporine use reduces long-term graft survival.     

Living unrelated donor renal transplantation: a single center experience

PURPOSE: Living, genetically unrelated donor renal transplantation (LURT) is being performed with increasing frequency. We evaluated our single center experience with LURT and compared this to a cohort of living related donor renal transplants (LRT) to evaluate the short-term success of LURT at our center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 99 consecutive patients who underwent LURT at our center and had at least 1 year of followup data. A control cohort of 99 patients who underwent LRT at our center matched for age, number of transplants and date of transplant was also identified. One-year graft and patient survival, and serum creatinine levels at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months were compared between the groups. Our data were compared with national and international data. RESULTS: At our center 1-year graft survival was 95% in the LURT and LRT cohorts. One-year LURT patient survival was 99% compared with 97% in the LRT group and the serum creatinine levels were not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing LURT at our center have excellent 1-year graft and patient survival compared with LRT performed at our center, and national and international LURT. Genetically unrelated kidney donors should continue to be used to expand the kidney donor pool.     

Long-term outlook for renal transplant recipients with one-year function. "Doctor, what are my chances"?

Patients with renal transplants that survive the first year often ask about the chance of long-term function. We studied 1850 patients with primary transplants from June 7, 1963 to September 1, 1988 who had graft survival of greater than 1 year. Patients were grouped by donor type, diabetic status, and whether or not they received cyclosporine (CsA). Half-life (T1/2) was used to compare long-term survival rates. We determined the long-term graft survival inclusive and exclusive of death with function (DwF) in order to study all patients and to direct attention to immunologic losses. Pre-CsA, DwF was the major cause of graft loss in each cohort. Cause of DwF was cardiovascular (49%), infection (26%), and cancer (14%). The percentage of patients experiencing DwF was much higher in the pre-CsA group vs. the CsA group: HLA-identical living related donor, 16% vs. 3%; non-HLA-identical LRD, 22% vs. 5%; and cadaver donors, 26% vs. 11%. T1/2 for 711 transplants to diabetics (DM) was 9.01 +/- .54 years, while for transplants to 1139 nondiabetics (NDM) T1/2 was 13.57 +/- .68 (P less than .05). When DwF is excluded (DwFex) DM T1/2 = 23.5 +/- 2.69 and NDM T1/2 = 22.2 +/- 1.55 (NS). Overall, for HLA-identical transplants (n = 297) T1/2 = 26.13 +/- 3.35 and DwFex T1/2 = 104.3 +/- 28.93. Nonidentical LRD (n = 845) T1/2 = 11.25 +/- .61 and DwFex T1/2 = 19.37 +/- 1.55. For CAD (n = 701) T1/2 = 9.10 +/- .54 and DwFex T1/2 = 17.49 +/- 1.65. Comparing pre- and post-CsA cohorts, CsA has not resulted in significant improvement in long-term graft survival by T1/2 analysis with DwFex. It appears that overall long-term graft survival has improved with the introduction of CsA. Much of the improvement may be attributed to better first year graft survival and a reduction in cases of DwF. DM patients have an equal opportunity for long-term graft survival if they do not die from other causes. Excluding DwF, especially as an older population is transplanted, is important in determining chances of immunologic loss. Use of this type of analysis suggests that long-term outlook for 1-year graft survivors is excellent.     

Are blood transfusions beneficial in the cyclosporine era?

In patients treated with conventional immunosuppression (azathioprine and prednisone) after renal transplantation, there is a beneficial effect of pre-transplant blood transfusions on graft survival; in patients treated with cyclosporine, this effect may be lost. In 66 children who received living-related donor transplants after donor-specific transfusions (DST) and were treated with azathioprine-prednisone in our center, 1- and 5-year graft survival rates were 99% and 77% respectively. These rates were similar to those reported for children who did not receive DST but were treated with cyclosporine in other centers. There were 634 adult and pediatric recipients of cadaver transplants in our center who were treated with cyclosporine and prednisone (non-sequential therapy,n=89) or antilymphoblast globulin, azathioprine preduisone, and cyclosporin (sequential therapy,n=545). When all patients were considered, graft survival rates were higher in transfused than in non-transfused patients at 3–5 years, but in the sequential therapy group, there were no differences in graft survival rates between transfused and non-transfused patients. The results suggest that transfusions do not improve cadaver graft survival in patients receiving optimal cyclosporine therapy and that equally good related donor graft survival can be achieved with DST and conventional immunosuppression or no DST and cyclosporine.     

HLA-identical sibling renal transplantation--a 21-yr single-center experience

Human lymphocyte antigen (HLA)-identical sibling organs offer the best long-term outcomes for recipients of a renal transplant apart from an identical twin. Unlike cadaveric transplants, however, factors that affect long-term survival of these immunologically privileged grafts are not well described. We reviewed 108 HLA-identical transplants performed at our institution between January 1977 and February 1993. Variables chosen for graft survival analysis were: gender, age and ABO blood type of donors and recipients, panel reactivity antibodies (PRA), blood transfusions prior to transplant, pregnancies, and the underlying renal disease. Additionally, incidence of acute rejection (AR), timing of AR, serum creatinine levels at 1 wk and at 1 yr, and presence of hypertension were included in the analysis. Mean follow-up was 130.9 +/- 58.2 months (range 38-250 months). Actual 5-yr patient and graft survivals were 92 and 88%, respectively. Thirty-eight grafts were lost, and 22 recipients died during the observation period. Death was the main cause of graft failure. Cardiac events accounted for the majority of deaths. AR occurred in 46% and repeated rejections in 11% of recipients. Actuarial graft survival at 10 yr was poorer for patients with any AR (69%), and significantly worse with repeated AR (33%), compared to patients without AR (86%), p = 0.001). Sixty percent of all rejections and 88% of the first rejections occurred in the first 60 d post-transplantation. The first AR that occurred after 60 d was associated with poor graft survival (49 vs. 70%, p = 0.04). Recipients with renal diseases with potential to recur (membranous glomerulonephritis (MGN), membrano-proliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN), focal and segmental glomerulonephritis (FSGN), polyarteritis nodosa (PAN), rapid progressive glomerulonephritis (RPGN), Henoch-Schoenlein purpura (HSP), diabetes mellitus (DM), interstitial nephritis, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and chronic glomerulonephritis (CGN)) faired worse as a group than recipients with hypertensive nephrosclerosis (HTN), autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), Alport's, reflux or congenital dysplasia (68 vs. 96% at 10 yr, p = 0.0009). Poor patient survival was seen in diabetics (71 vs. 88% at 10 yr, p = 0.01). There was a trend to poorer graft survival in diabetic recipients when compared to non-diabetics (65 vs. 81% at 10 yr, p = 0.054). Elevated creatinine at 1 yr was associated with worse graft survival. Likewise, the magnitude of creatinine increase during the first year directly correlated with the risk of graft loss. Hypertensive patients were more likely to lose their grafts than normotensive recipients (72 vs. 86%, p = 0.04). Pre-transplant blood transfusion, pregnancy, and PRA level were not associated with increased graft failure or AR. Graft survival was not affected by gender, age, or ABO blood type of donors or recipients. In conclusion, better prevention and treatment of AR, hypertension, and cardiac disease should improve graft and patient survival. Close attention to recurrence of disease and subtle changes in the creatinine level during the first year might dictate early diagnostic and, hopefully, therapeutic interventions.     

The impact of thymoglobulin on renal function and calcineurin inhibitor initiation in recipients of orthotopic liver transplant: a retrospective analysis of 298 consecutive patients

BACKGROUND: Renal dysfunction remains the Achilles' heel of calcineurin inhibitor (CI)use. The purpose of this study was to assess our institutional, renal-sparing strategy using thymoglobulin (TMG) in recipients of orthotopic liver transplants. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of data from 298 adult recipients who were transplanted between 1991 and 2002. The patients were divided into two groups: those induced with TMG (group 1) and those that were not treated with this agent (group 2). A subgroup analysis was performed of patients with baseline serum creatinine values above 1.5 mg/dL (group 1A received TMG; group 2A did not). All patients received tacrolimus or cyclosporine (CyA) maintenance immunosuppression. RESULTS: Indications and demographics were similar between the two groups. Although there was no difference in patient and graft survivals, there was a statistically significant benefit in the rejection-free graft survival at 1 year for group 1 (51% vs 39%; P =.02). Furthermore, serum creatinine at 6 months was lower for group 1, despite a similar baseline creatinine. Subgroup analysis for patients with baseline abnormal serum creatinines showed that group 1A displayed an improved rejection-free graft survival at 1 month but not at 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Thymoglobulin induction therapy may allow a delay in the initiation of CI therapy without compromising patient and graft survival, while preventing early rejection, even among patients with baseline renal dysfunction.     

Donor specific transfusions or cyclosporine for related-donor kidney transplantation?

DST and cyclosporine are two immunosuppressive strategies to improve first year graft survival in high MLC, one-haplotype matched, living-related donor kidney transplantation. However, each has disadvantages: The conventional strategy of DST may sensitize the recipient to donor antigens, precluding transplantation from that donor, and cyclosporine may increase graft failure due to nephrotoxicity. We used decision analysis to compare these two strategies. We assumed that the risk of sensitization by DST is 12%, that graft failure in the first year is equal in both strategies, but that the annual probability of graft failure in later years is 2.6% with DST and from 2.7% to 3.6% with cyclosporine. Patients sensitized by DST and patients with graft failure undergo dialysis while awaiting cadaveric donor transplantation using cyclosporine. Outcomes were assessed as quality-adjusted years of survival. The analysis was deliberately biased to favor DST, the conventional strategy. Quality-adjusted life expectancy for a 40-year-old patient in both strategies is from 17.7 to 19.1 years. The difference between the DST and cyclosporine strategies ranges from -0.7 to +0.6 years. Given current data on sensitization by DST, long-term cyclosporine nephrotoxicity, and deliberate biases favoring the DST strategy, we conclude that there is no substantive advantage of the DST strategy. Cyclosporine is equally efficacious for recipients of high MLC, one-haplotype matched kidney transplants, and may be preferred for transplants from more distant relatives and unrelated living donors.     

Improved Survival After Live Donor Adult Liver Transplantation (LDALT) Using Right Lobe Grafts: Program Experience and Lessons Learned

We present our program experience with 85 live donor adult liver transplantation (LDALT) procedures using right lobe grafts with five simultaneous live donor kidney transplants using different donors performed over a 6-year period. After an "early" 2-year experience of 25 LDALT procedures, program improvements in donor and recipient selection, preoperative imaging, donor and recipient surgical technique and immunosuppressive management significantly reduced operative mortality (16% vs. 3.3%, p = 0.038) and improved patient and graft 1-year survival in recipients during our "later" experience with the next 60 cases (January 2001 and March 2005; patient survival: early 70.8% vs. later 92.7%, p = 0.028; graft survival: Early 64% vs. later 91.1%, p = 0.019, respectively). Overall patient and graft survival were 82% and 80%. There was a trend for less postoperative complications (major and minor) with program experience (early 88% vs. later 66.7%; p = 0.054) but overall morbidity remained at 73.8%. Biliary complications (cholangitis, disruption, leak or stricture) were not influenced by program experience (early 32% vs. later 38%). Liver volume adjusted to 100% of standard liver volume (SLV) within 1 month post-transplant. Despite a high rate of morbidity after LDALT, excellent patient and graft survival can be achieved with program experience.     

Increased rejection in living unrelated versus living related kidney transplants does not affect short-term function and survival

BACKGROUND: At our institution, increased kidney donation from unrelated donors accounts for a steady rise in live donor kidney transplantation rates. We compared outcomes of living related (LRT) versus living unrelated kidney transplants (LURT) and analyzed the effect of early rejection upon graft survival. METHODS: A retrospective analysis on 428 adult living donor kidney transplants was performed. Graft function and survival were compared between LRT and LURT and risk factors for 1-year rejection were defined by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Between 1/1/97 and 12/31/01, 308 LRT and 120 LURT were performed at the University of California San Francisco. Donor age and number of mismatches were significantly higher in the LURT group. Patient and graft survival were similar in both groups. After a median follow-up of 26 months, graft survival was 94.8% (LRT) versus 93.3% (LURT). Five-year serum creatinine levels were comparable in both populations. One-year rejection was higher in the LURT group (30% vs. 18.5%; P<0.01). Rejection was influenced by the number of human leukocyte antigen mismatches. Other independent risk factors for early rejection were poor initial graft function, donor age greater than 55 years, and recipient body mass index greater than 30. Patients with poor initial graft function and early rejection had a statistically greater incidence of subtherapeutic tacrolimus trough levels on postoperative day 7. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a higher incidence of early rejection, LURT show similar function and survival compared with LRT. In high-risk patients receiving living unrelated renal transplants, consideration should be given to intensify initial immunosuppression to prevent early rejection episodes.     

Kidney transplantation in type 2 diabetic patients: a comparison with matched non-diabetic subjects.

BACKGROUND: Because they generally are older and frequently have co-morbidities, patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and end-stage renal disease seldom are selected for renal transplantation. Thus, information on transplantation results from controlled studies in this high-risk category of patients is scarce. We have compared the results of kidney transplantations in type 2 diabetic patients with carefully matched non-diabetic subjects. METHODS: All first cadaveric renal transplants performed in type 2 diabetic patients from January 1, 1988 to December 31, 1998 in our centre were included. Non-diabetic controls were individually matched with diabetic patients with respect to year of transplantation, sex, age, selected immunological parameters, and graft cold ischaemia. RESULTS: We included 64 type 2 diabetic and 64 non-diabetic patients who were followed for a mean period of 37+/-27 and 41+/-31 months, respectively, after renal transplantation. Patient survival at 1 and 5 years post-transplant was 85 and 69 vs 84 and 74% (P=0.43, NS), while graft survival rates censored for patient death were 84 and 77 vs 82 and 77% for diabetic and non-diabetic subjects, respectively (P=0.52, NS). With graft survival results not censored for death with functioning graft, no significant change was seen (diabetic vs non-diabetic group: 77 and 54 vs 73 and 61%, P=0.19, NS). Age, but not the presence of diabetes, was the only factor significantly affecting patient survival when both patient groups were pooled. With regard to post-transplant complications requiring hospitalization, there was a significant difference only in the number of patients who had amputations (diabetic vs non-diabetic group: 8 vs 0, P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Patient and graft survival after kidney transplantation was similar in type 2 diabetic and matched non-diabetic subjects, with more amputations occurring in the diabetic group. Thus, at a single-centre level renal transplantation results almost equivalent to those in non-diabetic patients may be achieved in type 2 diabetes mellitus.     

Basiliximab and mycophenolate mofetil in combination with low-dose cyclosporine and methylprednisolone effectively prevent acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients

The aim of the study was to analyze whether immunosuppressive treatment with basiliximab and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), allowed a reduction in methylprednisolone and cyclosporine dosages without increasing the incidence of acute rejection episodes, reducing 1-year graft and patient survivals, or increasing the rates of infections and malignancy in the first year. The two groups were group A (n = 72), treated with methylprednisolone and cyclosporine and in the first 2 weeks with azathioprine; group B (n = 72), treated with basiliximab, MMF, and low-dose cyclosporine and methylprednisolone. The patients were followed for 1 year. The incidence of acute rejection episodes in the first year was significantly lower in group B (2.8%) than group A (12.5%; P < .05). The cumulative methylprednisolone dose, the daily dose, and the average cyclosporine trough blood level were significantly lower in group B (P < .001). One-year serum creatinine was significantly lower in group B (112 +/- 45 micromol/L) than group A (138 +/- 51 micromol/L; P < .01). One-year graft survival was 91.7% in group A and 98.6% in group B. One-year patient survival was 98.6% in group A and 100% in group B. The groups did not differ significantly in the incidence of bacterial, viral, or fungal infections. Immunosuppression with basiliximab and MMF allowed a reduction in cyclosporine and methylprednisolone dosages and was associated with significantly lower incidences of acute rejections episodes with better graft function in the first year as opposed to immunosuppression with higher doses of cyclosporine and methylprednisolone alone. Both immunosuppressive regimens showed the same infection rates and did not differ significantly in the occurrence of malignant diseases within the first year.     

Effect of recipient sensitization (peak PRA) on graft outcome in haploidentical living related kidney transplants

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of pre-transplant recipient sensitization on the outcome of 1-haploidentical live related donor (LRD) kidney transplants. METHOD: We reviewed 141 consecutive cyclosporine-treated adult haploidentical first transplants for which panel reactive antibody (PRA) levels were available. Patients were divided into three groups according to their peak PRA levels: group I, PRA = 0 (n = 97); group II, PRA = 1-50% (n = 24); and group III, PRA = 51-100% (n = 20). RESULTS: Differences in PRA were associated with significant differences in short- and longer-term graft survival, unrelated to patient survival. Graft survival at 1, 3, and 5 yr was only 74, 40, and 27% in group III, compared to 92, 87, and 52% in group II, and 96, 91, and 85% in group I (p < 0.001). Increasing PRA was associated with shorter time-to-graft failure. In group III, 20% lost their transplant from acute rejection in the first 6 months, versus 4% in group II and 3% in group I (p < 0.01). Graft survival in group II diverged from that of group I only after 3 yr, due to an increase in loss from chronic rejection. Hospitalization was longer in group III, in association with a significantly higher incidence of acute rejection during the first 3 months after transplantation (p < 0.02). Serum creatinine was higher in sensitized than nonsensitized patients at all time points. CONCLUSIONS: Sensitization has a significant negative impact on the outcome of haploidentical LRD kidney transplants. Sensitized potential recipients and their potential donors should be aware of this in arriving at informed decision-making for transplantation. These patients may benefit from more sensitive cross-match testing, more intense or more novel immunosuppression, or immunomodulation to modify their immune responsiveness.     

The effect of transfusions on renal allograft survival in the cyclosporine era: a single center report

The potential efficacy of prior transplant transfusions on graft survival in the cyclosporine era has been reported from several centers which are reconsidering their transfusion policy. The purpose of this study has been to evaluate the results obtained in a large series of first kidney transplant patients (N=284) treated with cyclosporine. Our past experience showed a beneficial effect of blood transfusions in cadaveric renal transplants on conventional immunosuppression. Forty-eight patients never received blood transfusions, 85 patients received 1-2 transfusions, 72 patients received 3-5 transfusions and 79 patients received more than 5 transfusions in their pre-transplant periods. We did not show an obvious beneficial effect of prior blood transfusions in improving 1- and 2-year patient and graft survival. In fact, no statistically significant differences were found among any of the groups depending upon the transfusion status. In the transfused group, graft survival rates were 81.4% (1 year) and 77.8% (2 years) while in the non-transfused group they were 81.2% (1 year) and 78.4% (2 years)(p=n.s.). The patients who rejected had a significantly lower graft survival in the transfused group as compared to the non-transfused group. On the other hand, the transfused patients without rejection episodes experienced the best graft survival, suggesting a beneficial transfusion effect. We conclude that since it is impossible to determine which patients will not reject, pre-transplant transfusions under certain circumstances might be harmful, or at least not beneficial. We would recommend restricting transfusions in cyclosporine-tested patients only in cases of therapeutic necessity.