Leaf water potentials measured with a pressure chamber

Leaf water potentials were estimated from the sum of the balancing pressure measured with a pressure chamber and the osmotic potential of the xylem sap in leafy shoots or leaves. When leaf water potentials in yew, rhododendron, and sunflower were compared with those measured with a thermocouple psychrometer known to indicate accurate values of leaf water potential, determinations were within ± 2 bars of the psychrometer measurements with sunflower and yew. In rhododendron. water potentials measured with the pressure chamber plus xylem sap were 2.5 bars less negative to 4 bars more negative than psychrometer measurements.

The discrepancies in the rhododendron measurements could be attributed, at least in part, to the filling of tissues other than xylem with xylem sap during measurements with the pressure chamber. It was concluded that, although stem characteristics may affect the measurements, pressure chamber determinations were sufficiently close to psychrometer measurements that the pressure chamber may be used for relative measurements of leaf water potentials, especially in sunflower and yew. For accurate determinations of leaf water potential, however, pressure chamber measurements must be calibrated with a thermocouple psychrometer.

     

Chloroplast response to low leaf water potentials: I. Role of turgor

The effect of decreases in turgor on chloroplast activity was studied by measuring the photochemical activity of intact sunflower (Helianthus annuus L. cv. Russian Mammoth) leaves having low water potentials. Leaf turgor, calculated from leaf water potential and osmotic potential, was found to be affected by the dilution of cell contents by water in the cell walls, when osmotic potentials were measured with a thermocouple psychrometer. After the correction of measurements of leaf osmotic potential, both the thermocouple psychrometer and a pressure chamber indicated that turgor became zero in sunflower leaves at leaf water potentials of −10 bars. Since most of the loss in photochemical activity occurred at water potentials below −10 bars, it was concluded that turgor had little effect on the photochemical activity of the leaves.     

Errors in measuring water potentials of small samples resulting from water adsorption by thermocouple psychrometer chambers

The adsorption of water by thermocouple psychrometer assemblies is known to cause errors in the determination of water potential. Experiments were conducted to evaluate the effect of sample size and psychrometer chamber volume on measured water potentials of leaf discs, leaf segments, and sodium chloride solutions. Reasonable agreement was found between soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) leaf water potentials measured on 5-millimeter radius leaf discs and large leaf segments. Results indicated that while errors due to adsorption may be significant when using small volumes of tissue, if sufficient tissue is used the errors are negligible. Because of the relationship between water potential and volume in plant tissue, the errors due to adsorption were larger with turgid tissue. Large psychrometers which were sealed into the sample chamber with latex tubing appeared to adsorb more water than those sealed with flexible plastic tubing. Estimates are provided of the amounts of water adsorbed by two different psychrometer assemblies and the amount of tissue sufficient for accurate measurements of leaf water potential with these assemblies. It is also demonstrated that water adsorption problems may have generated low water potential values which in prior studies have been attributed to large cut surface area to volume ratios.     

Relationship of water potential to growth of leaves

A thermocouple psychrometer that measures water potentials of intact leaves was used to study the water potentials at which leaves grow. Water potentials and water uptake during recovery from water deficits were measured simultaneously with leaves of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.), tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.), papaya (Carica papaya L.), and Abutilon striatum Dickson. Recovery occurred in 2 phases. The first was associated with elimination of water deficits; the second with cell enlargement. The second phase was characterized by a steady rate of water uptake and a relatively constant leaf water potential. Enlargement was 70% irreversible and could be inhibited by puromycin and actinomycin D. During this time, leaves growing with their petioles in contact with pure water remained at a water potential of —1.5 to —2.5 bars regardless of the length of the experiment. It was not possible to obtain growing leaf tissue with a water potential of zero. It was concluded that leaves are not in equilibrium with the potential of the water which is absorbed during growth. The nonequilibrium is brought about by a resistance to water flow which requires a potential difference of 1.5 to 2.5 bars in order to supply water at the rate necessary for maximum growth.

Leaf growth occurred in sunflower only when leaf water potentials were above —3.5 bars. Sunflower leaves therefore require a minimum turgor for enlargement, in this instance equivalent to a turgor of about 6.5 bars. The high water potentials required for growth favored rapid leaf growth at night and reduced growth during the day.

     

Effects of salt secretion on psychrometric determinations of water potential of cotton leaves

Thermocouple psychrometers gave lower estimates of water potential of cotton leaves than did a pressure chamber. This difference was considerable for turgid leaves, but progressively decreased for leaves with lower water potentials and fell to zero at water potentials below about −10 bars. The conductivity of washings from cotton leaves removed from the psychrometric equilibration chambers was related to the magnitude of this discrepancy in water potential, indicating that the discrepancy is due to salts on the leaf surface which make the psychrometric estimates too low. This error, which may be as great as 400 to 500%, cannot be eliminated by washing the leaves because salts may be secreted during the equilibration period. Therefore, a thermocouple psychrometer is not suitable for measuring the water potential of cotton leaves when it is above about −10 bars.     

In situ field measurement of leaf water potential using thermocouple psychrometers

Thermocouple psychrometers are the only instruments which can measure the in situ water potential of intact leaves, and which can possibly be used to monitor leaf water potential. Unfortunately, their usefulness is limited by a number of difficulties, among them fluctuating temperatures and temperature gradients within the psychrometer, sealing of the psychrometer chamber to the leaf, shading of the leaf by the psychrometer, and resistance to water vapor diffusion by the cuticle when the stomates are closed. Using Citrus jambhiri, we have tested several psychrometer design and operational modifications and showed that in situ psychrometric measurements compared favorably with simultaneous Scholander pressure chamber measurements on neighboring leaves when the latter were corrected for the osmotic potential.     

Effect of Cuticular Abrasion on Thermocouple Psychrometric In Situ Measurement of Leaf Water Potential

Cuticular resistance to water vapour diffusion between the substomatalcavity and the sensing psychrometer junction is a problem uniqueto leaf hygrometry. This resistance is not encountered in soilor solution hygrometry. The cuticular resistance may introduceerror in the measurement of leaf water potential. Using in situleaf hygrometers, we studied the effect of abrading the cuticleof Citrus jambhiri Lushington leaves, to reduce the diffusiveresistance. Field measurements of psychrometer water potentialwere compared with Scholander pressure chamber values for adjacentleaves. Different treatments were compared by sealing pairsof psychrometers on either side of the midrib. The time forwater vapour equilibration between the leaf and the psychrometerchamber was greater than 5 h for no abrasion. For abraded leaves,the true water potential value was obtained within an hour.After equilibration, psychrometer values compared favourablywith pressure chamber values for adjacent leaves (r > 0.97).Measured water potential for unabraded leaves did not correlatewell with corresponding pressure chamber measurements. Scanning electron micrographs indicated that the damage causedby abrading leaves for 60 s using carborundum powder (60 µmdiameter) was surface localized, with numerous scratchings ofthe leaf cuticle. The coarse abrasion treatment (aluminium oxide,75 µm diameter) resulted in fewer but larger cavitiesin the epidermis, which may explain the observed variabilityin the corresponding psychrometric measurements. Key words: Leaf water potential, Cuticular resistance, Leaf abrasion, Thermocouple psychrometer     

Comparison of water potentials measured by in situ psychrometry and pressure chamber in morphologically different species

Leaf water potentials measured by in situ psychrometry were compared with leaf water potentials measured by the pressure chamber technique at various values of water potential in Helianthus annuus, Helianthus nuttallii, Vigna unguiculata, Nerium oleander, Pistacia vera, and Corylus avellana. In V. unguiculata, the leaf water potentials measured by the in situ psychrometer oscillated at the same periodicity as, and proportional to, the leaf conductance. In all species, potentials measured by in situ psychrometers operating in the psychrometric mode were linearly correlated with potentials measured with the pressure chamber. However, the in situ psychrometers underestimated the leaf water potential in the two Helianthus species at low water potentials and overestimated the water potential in P. vera, N. oleander, and C. avellana. The underestimation in the two Helianthus species at low water potentials resulted from differences in water potential across the leaf. The overestimation in P. vera, N. oleander, and C. avellana was considered to arise from low epidermal conductances in these species even after abrasion of the cuticle. Pressure-volume studies with Lycopersicon esculentum showed that less water was expressed from distal than proximal leaflets when the whole leaf was slowly pressurized. The implication of this for water relations characteristics obtained by pressure-volume techniques is discussed. We conclude that in situ psychrometers are suitable for following dynamic changes in leaf water potential, but should be used with caution on leaves with low epidermal conductances.     

Theoretical and experimental errors for in situ measurements of plant water potential

Errors in psychrometrically determined values of leaf water potential caused by tissue resistance to water vapor exchange and by lack of thermal equilibrium were evaluated using commercial in situ psychrometers (Wescor Inc., Logan, UT) on leaves of Tradescantia virginiana (L.). Theoretical errors in the dewpoint method of operation for these sensors were demonstrated. After correction for these errors, in situ measurements of leaf water potential indicated substantial errors caused by tissue resistance to water vapor exchange (4 to 6% reduction in apparent water potential per second of cooling time used) resulting from humidity depletions in the psychrometer chamber during the Peltier condensation process. These errors were avoided by use of a modified procedure for dewpoint measurement. Large changes in apparent water potential were caused by leaf and psychrometer exposure to moderate levels of irradiance. These changes were correlated with relatively small shifts in psychrometer zero offsets (−0.6 to −1.0 megapascals per microvolt), indicating substantial errors caused by nonisothermal conditions between the leaf and the psychrometer. Explicit correction for these errors is not possible with the current psychrometer design.     

Components of water potential estimated from xylem pressure measurements in five tree species

Summary Pressure volume curves were measured with a pressure bomb in leaves collected in the field from Ilex opaca, Acer rubrum, Liquidambar styraciflua, Liriodendron tulipifera and Cornus florida. Water potential components were calculated from the curves. The species differed in the relationships measured. In all species the trends from summer to fall were toward lower (more negative) osmotic potentials, lower matric potentials more rapid loss of turgor with increasing leaf water deficit, and the occurrence of incipient plasmolysis at lower values of leaf water deficit. Initial osmotic potentials ranged from-14.8 to-19.8 bars, similar to values reported in the literature for other mesophytic plants. These values, however, were much higher than those reported for halophytes and xerophytes. The fraction of leaf water which contributes to the osmotic potential ranged from 0.74 to 0.98 in this study. Values reported for other mesophytes and for halophytes and xerophytes all fall well within this range. Patterns of component water potentials are discussed in relation to potential growth rates and water flow in the total plant system.     

Psychrometric Field Measurement of Water Potential Changes following Leaf Excision

In situ measurement of sudden leaf water potential changes has not been performed under field conditions. A laboratory investigation involving the measurement of leaf water potential prior to and 2 to 200 minutes after excision of citrus leaves (Citrus jambhiri) showed good linear correlation (r = 0.99) between in situ leaf psychrometer and Scholander pressure chamber measurements. Following this, a field investigation was conducted which involved psychrometric measurement prior to petiole excision and 1 minute after excision. Simultaneous pressure chamber measurements were performed on neighboring leaves prior to the time of excision and then on the psychrometer leaf about 2 minutes after excision. These data indicate that within the first 2 minutes after excision, psychrometer and pressure chamber measurements were linearly correlated (r = 0.97). Under high evaporative demand conditions, the rate of water potential decrease was between 250 and 700 kilopascals in the first minute after excision. These results show that the thermocouple psychrometer can be used as a dynamic and nondestructive field technique for monitoring leaf water potential.     

Effect of water potential on seed germination

The response of seed germination to substrate water potential was determined for several plant species of the arctic tundra. Seeds were collected from Cape Thompson and Eagle Summit, Alaska and germinated on dialysis membranes over water solutions of polyethylene glycol with osmotic potentials of 0 to −6 bars. Germination did not occur with potentials below −3 bars, except for three fellfield species. Germination was delayed at lower osmotic potentials. Because the response of most species was similar, substrate water potential is probably not a factor affecting the establishment of most tundra plant species from seeds.     

Growth of Alaskan tundra plants in relation to water potential

The relationship of growth to plant water potential was studied in several arctic tundra species by experimentally altering the water regimes on excised tussocks, by clipping leaf area, and by clipping roots. Most species, including evergreen shrubs, showed greater growth under waterlogged conditions. The reduction of leaf area did not affect plant water potentials or growth. Root pruning decreased both plant water potentials and growth. Growth was suppressed when plant water potentials were −12 to −15 bars.     

Soil water regimes and water extraction patterns under two semi-arid shrub (Atriplex spp.) communities

Soil water regimes and water extraction patterns estimated over a period of two years are described for two plantation communities of semi-arid shrubs, Atriplex vesicaria Hew. ex Benth. and A. nummularia Lindl., growing on the same soil type under identical climatological conditions near Deniliquin, New South Wales. In spite of poor water flow properties of the soil, surface run-off was negligible.About 90% of the extractable water was stored in the top (45 cm) soil layer. Both species withstood exceedingly low water potentials, although A, vesicaria reduced soil water to a much lower water potential than did A. nummularia. Water potentials at depths below 60 cm were always – 15 bars and remained constant. Water extracted beyond –15 bars amounted to 41% more than the water available within conventionally accepted water potential limits (between –0.3 to – 15 bars). During Slimmer, the plant water potential of A. vesicaria fell to much lower values than that of A. nummularia. Relationships between relative leaf water content and plant water potential differed between the two species, and the suggestion is made that at low plant water potential, leaf targidity of A. vesicaria would be higher, and thus this species would have a higher tolerance to desiccation. On a yearly, half-yearly and even a quarterly basis, evapotranspiration (FT) of the two communities did not differ. Fortnightly FT rates were similar during winter but during early summer, the initial ET rate of A. vesicaria was higher than that of A. nummularia; A, nummularia can therefore conserve water for later use. These differences in water extraction patterns and evapotranspiration were associated with differential rooting characteristics and probably differential stomatal functioning. The relationships between fortnightly ET/FO (ratio of actual evapotranspiration to that from a Class A pan) and profile water content, for both communities, were linear but different.     

Measured and Calculated Transpiration in Trifolium repens under Different Water Potentials

The relationship between transpiration measured gravimetrically,a generalized transpiration equation, and the ratio VPD/r_leafwas investigated in Trifolium repens plants subjected to varyingwater potentials. Dawn leaf water potential was measured witha pressure chamber, leaf diffusion resistance with a diffusionporometer, leaf temperatures with a thermistor, and relativehumidity with an aspirated psychrometer. During drought transpirationrates determined by both methods were quite similar particularlyat the lowest water potentials. After rewatering calculatedrates were somewhat higher than measured ones. It is concludedthat transpiration calculated by the indirect method is a usefuland reasonable estimate of transpiration for single plants undervarying water potentials.     

Thermocouple psychrometer for in situ leaf water potential determinations

Summary An in situ thermocouple psychrometer was tested to determine its capability for tracking the changing leaf water potentials of aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) under controlled conditions and in the field. The results agreed with theoretical expectations — a sharp decline in leaf water potential during the photoperiods and recovery during the dark periods, each to progressively lower levels during a soil drying cycle. In the field, a mid-day pause in the declining leaf water potentials was noted and attributed to transient stomatal closure. Details of the construction and use of the assembly are given.The authors are plant physiologists, USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, Utah 84401, stationed in Logan, Utah, at the Forestry Sciences Laboratory.     

The Relationship Between Leaf Thickness and Plant Water Potential

Leaf thickness was continuously measured in a wide range ofenvironments using a new type of displacement transducer whichis easy to set-up and automatically compensates for the effectsof temperature. Simultaneous measurements were made of waterpotential using either a psychrometer attached to the leaf petioleor a leaf pressure chamber. Thickness of leaves was a sensitiveindicator of plant water status but calibrations against anindependent method were necessary in every plant for accurateestimates of water potential. The relationship between leafthickness changes and water potential, measured in detachedleaves, was usually curvilinear and was strongly influencedby leaf age, stress history and, in young leaves, by the effectsof leaf growth. Leaf thickness growth was absent in mature cabbageleaves. Key words: Leaf thickness, plant water potential, psychrometer     

The Effect of Soil Water Regimes on Leaf Water Potential, Growth and Development of Soybeans

The growth and development of soybeans (Glycine max L. cv. Amsoy) was studied at soil matric potentials of ?0.1 to ?1.0 bars. Chlorophyll, photosynthesis, and leaf nitrogen per plant was greatest at ?4 bars leaf water potential. Leaf area, number of internodes, plant height and dry weight of vegetative parts declined as leaf water potential decreased from ?2 to ?19 bars. Nitrogen content and nitrate reductase activity per g fresh weight determined the percentage protein of individual seeds but nitrogen content and nitrate reductase activity per plant determined the amount of total seed protein. The protein synthesized in the seed changed little in amino acid composition with changes in leaf water potential. Leaf water potentials above or below ?4 bars decreased yield, total protein and total lipid but plants produced the largest percentage of individual seed protein at ?19 bars leaf water potential.     

Behavior of Corn and Sorghum under Water Stress and during Recovery

Corn (Zea mays L.) and sorghum (Sorghum vulgare, Pers.) plants were grown in a vermiculite-gravel mixture in controlled environment chambers until they were 40 days old. Water was withheld until they were severely wilted, and they were then rewatered. During drying and after rewatering stomatal resistance was measured with a diffusion porometer each morning, and water saturation deficit and water potential were measured on leaf samples. The average resistance of the lower epidermis of well watered plants was lower for corn than for sorghum. When water stress developed, the stomata began to close at a higher water potential in corn than in sorghum. The stomata of both species began to reopen normally soon after the wilted plants were rewatered, and on the 2nd day the leaf resistances were nearly as low as those of the controls. The average leaf water potential of well watered corn was −4.5 bars; that of sorghum, −6.4 bars. The lowest leaf water potential in stressed corn was −12.8 bars at a water saturation deficit of 45%. The lowest leaf water potential in stressed sorghum was −15.7 bars, but the water saturation deficit was only 29%. At these values the leaves of both species were tightly rolled or folded and some injury was apparent. Thus, although the average leaf resistance of corn is little lower than that of sorghum, corn loses much more of its water before the stomata are fully closed than does sorghum. The smaller reduction in water content of sorghum for a given reduction in leaf water potential is characteristic of drought-resistant species.     

Recovery of photosynthesis in sunflower after a period of low leaf water potential

Photosynthesis was studied in sunflower plants subjected to 1 to 2 days of desiccation and then permitted to recover. The leaf water potential to which leaves returned after rewatering was dependent on the severity of desiccation and the evaporative conditions. Under moderately evaporative conditions, leaf water potential returned to predesiccation levels after 3 to 5 hours when desiccation was slight. Leaf water potentials remained below predesiccation levels for several days after rewatering when leaf water potentials decreased to −13 to −19 bars during desiccation. Leaf water potential showed no sign of recovery when leaf water potentials decreased to −20 bars or below during desiccation. The lack of full recovery of leaf water potential was attributable to increased resistance to water transport in the roots and stem. The resistance ultimately became large enough to result in death of the leaves because net water loss continued even after the soil had been rewatered.