Parental myopia,near work,school achievement,and children's refractive error

PURPOSE: To quantify the degree of association between juvenile myopia and parental myopia, near work, and school achievement. METHODS: Refractive error, parental refractive status, current level of near activities (assumed working distance-weighted hours per week spent studying, reading for pleasure, watching television, playing video games or working on the computer), hours per week spent playing sports, and level of school achievement (scores on the Iowa Tests of Basic Skills [ITBS]) were assessed in 366 eighth grade children who participated in the Orinda Longitudinal Study of Myopia in 1991 to 1996. RESULTS: Children with myopia were more likely to have parents with myopia; to spend significantly more time studying, more time reading, and less time playing sports; and to score higher on the ITBS Reading and Total Language subtests than emmetropic children (chi(2) and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests; P < 0.024). Multivariate logistic regression models showed no substantial confounding effects between parental myopia, near work, sports activity, and school achievement, suggesting that each factor has an independent association with myopia. The multivariate odds ratio (95% confidence interval) for two compared with no parents with myopia was 6.40 (2.17-18.87) and was 1.020 (1.008-1.032) for each diopter-hour per week of near work. Interactions between parental myopia and near work were not significant (P = 0.67), indicating no increase in the risk associated with near work with an increasing number of parents with myopia. CONCLUSIONS: Heredity was the most important factor associated with juvenile myopia, with smaller independent contributions from more near work, higher school achievement, and less time in sports activity. There was no evidence that children inherit a myopigenic environment or a susceptibility to the effects of near work from their parents.     

厦门地区城市与农村儿童近距离用眼与近视的关系

目的 :调查中国厦门城市与农村 8～ 9岁儿童近视的患病情况 ,并以此评估环境因素对近视患病率的影响。方法 :对中国厦门城市 (n =119)和农村 (n =91)的小学二年级学生进行散瞳电脑验光和眼生物参数测量 ,并采用同一标准的调查表进行面对面地问卷调查 ,内容包括社会经济地位、近距离用眼活动情况、读写习惯、近视眼家族史等。结果 :近视的发病率在城市为 19.3% [95 %可信区间confidenceinterval(CI) :12 .3,2 9],在农村是 6 .6 % (95 %CI:2 .4 ,14 .3)。城市在校学生每天课外读写平均时间是 2 .2h ,农村学生的收稿日期 :2 0 0 2 -0 3 -14 ;修回日期 :2 0 0 2 -0 5 -0 8基金项目 :新加坡政府及厦门开元区科委资助项目。作者简介 :张铭志 (195 7-) ,女 ,山东费县人 ,医学硕士 ,副主任医师。研究方向 :白内障、青光眼、近视。通信作者 :张铭志 (E -mail:fu- zhifu @hotmail.com)。时间是 1.6h(P <0 .0 0 1) ,所得结果经近视眼家族史因素校正后 ,总体读写时间比值比为 2 .2 (95 %CL :1.1,4 )。结论 :近视眼发病率 ,城市高于农村。城市儿童的课外读书时间比农村儿童长 ,城市和农村的近视儿童在读书上花费的时间明显高于非近视儿童。近距离用眼的增多可能导致了近视眼的发生 ,这为近距离用眼学说提供了更多依据     

Nearwork in early-onset myopia

PURPOSE: To determine the relationship of nearwork and myopia in young elementary school-age children in Singapore. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of 1005 school children aged 7 to 9 years was conducted in two schools in Singapore. Cycloplegic autorefraction, keratometry, and biometry measurements were performed. In addition, the parents completed a detailed questionnaire on nearwork activity (books read per week, reading in hours per day and diopter hours [addition of three times reading, two times computer use, and two times video games use in hours per day]). Other risk factors, such as parental myopia, socioeconomic status, and light exposure history, were assessed. RESULTS: In addition to socioeconomic factors, several nearwork indices were associated with myopia in these young children. The multivariate adjusted odds ratio of higher myopia (at least -3.0 D) for children who read more than two books per week was 3.05 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.80-5.18). However, the odds ratios of higher myopia for children who read more than 2 hours per day or with more than 8 diopter hours (1.50; 95% CI, 0.87-2.55 and 1.04; 95% CI, 0.61-1.78, respectively) were not significant, after controlling for several factors. CONCLUSIONS: Children aged 7 to 9 years with a greater current reading exposure were more likely to be myopic. This association of reading and myopia in a young age cohort was greater than the strength of the reading association generally found in older myopic subjects. Whether these results identify an association of early-onset myopia with nearwork activity or other potentially confounding factors is discussed.     

Influence of indoor and outdoor activities on progression of myopia during puberty

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether time spent on indoor and outdoor activities or the other possible risk factors including age, gender, parental history, and initial refraction was associated with progression of myopia, during puberty. Fifty eyes of 50 myopic children aged 9–14 years were enrolled in the study. The parents were interviewed to determine the amounts of time in hours per day spent on reading and writing, using computer, watching TV, and outdoor activities (i.e., sports, games, or being outdoor with no activities) on an average day. The annual myopia progression rate (diopters per year) was calculated for each subject and was used in the statistical analyses. The mean initial age of the subjects was 10.9 ± 1.5 (ranging from 9 to 14) years. The mean follow-up period was 33.3 ± 10.3 (ranging from 17 to 55) months. There was a significant increase in the mean myopia value of the subjects after follow-up period (p < 0.001). The mean daily time spent on reading and writing and initial refraction value were independently associated with annual myopic progression rate. On the other hand, age, gender, parental myopia, and the mean daily times spent on computer use, watching TV, and outdoor activities had no correlations with annual myopia progression rate. The present study showed that myopia progression was associated with time spent on reading and writing and initial refraction value, during puberty. However, myopia progression was not associated with parental myopia, age, gender, and daily times spent on using computer, watching TV, and outdoor activities.     

Refractive errors of medical students in Turkey: one year follow-up of refraction and biometry.

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to determine the prevalence of refractive errors in Turkish medical students as well as to determine the change in refractive status of medical students within 1 year. Besides general refractive characteristics of the students, the possible relationship between the occurrence of myopia and several factors was also determined. METHODS: Two hundred and seven medical students (114 female/93 male) were checked for their refractive status as determined by cycloplegic autorefraction. In addition to keratometric and biometric measurements students also answered a detailed questionnaire. One year later, medical students who participated to the study were re-examined. RESULTS: Myopia occurred in 32.9% of medical students with low myopia (spherical equivalent between -0.75 diopters [D] and -2.99 D) being the most common type (81%). The frequency of myopia was not significantly different between female and male medical students (37.7 and 26.8%, respectively; p=0.13). Adult onset myopia (onset at age 18 years or older) comprised 14.7% of all myopia cases. Myopic students were significantly more likely to report parental myopia. The percentage of myopes and nonmyopes reporting having one or two myopic parents was 51.5 and 28.8%, respectively (p=0.002). Parental myopia was also an independent risk factor associated with the occurrence of myopia on multivariate analysis (odds ratio [OR]=3.69, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.98-6.87). Nonmyopes also reported a significantly higher prevalence of outdoor activity before and at age seven (68.4%) than did myopes (48.6%), (p=0.009). Outdoor activity during early childhood was found to be protective for myopia on multivariate analysis (OR=0.44, %95 CI=0.23-0.82). There was no significant difference between myopes and nonmyopes with respect to amount of close-up activity. No significant shift of refraction occurred within 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: About one-third of Turkish medical students had myopia. Parental myopia was more common among myopic students and was a risk factor for the occurrence of myopia suggesting a familial predisposition. Outdoor activity in early childhood has had a protective role against the development of myopia in this study sample.     

Impact of family history of high myopia on level and onset of myopia

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of a positive family history of high myopia on the level and onset of myopia and its ocular components. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted. The participants (aged 17 to 45 years) were categorized into four groups: normal, mild, moderate, and high myopia. The age of first glasses for myopia was used as the onset of myopia. The impact of the family history on the level and the onset of myopia was quantified. Parental effect on corneal curvature (CC), anterior chamber depth (ACD), and axial length (AXL) was analyzed. RESULTS: The study included 185 normal subjects, 170 mild, 140 moderate, and 392 high myopes. Family history was strongly associated with the probands' status (P < 6 x 10(-12)). When there was >or=1 highly myopic parent, the odds ratios (ORs) of developing mild or moderate myopia were between 2.5 and 3.7 (95% CI: 1.1-6.5) and the ORs of having high myopia were > 5.5 (95% CI: 3.2-12.6). A strong association (P = 2 x 10(-6)) between parental myopic state and the AXL in the subjects was also found, but there was no statistical relationship for ACD or CC. There was an association between high myopia in parents and the onset of myopia in children. Siblings had a weaker association with the level of myopia and had no effect on the onset of myopia. CONCLUSIONS: This study found strong familial effects on the level and onset of myopia even after adjusting for environmental factors. The parental effect on ocular components in their offspring was primarily on AXL.     

Temporal variations in myopia progression in Singaporean children within an academic year.

PURPOSE: Excessive nearwork is believed to be associated with myopia development and progression. To investigate this further, we studied refractive error changes and their correlation with nearwork in a cohort of grade school children in Singapore. METHODS: Cycloplegic autorefraction was performed 5 times over 10 months on 168 children aged 7, 9, and 12 years who were further divided into myopic and nonmyopic subgroups based in their initial refractive errors. Information about nearwork was obtained through diaries filled out over 24 h at the commencement of the study. RESULTS: Myopia progression was high (overall mean: -0.87 D per year) and largely linear throughout the year, but significantly higher rates were seen after the final school examinations in 7-year-old myopes and nonmyopes. Overall, myopic groups exhibited higher progression rates than nonmyopic groups, although 33.6% of subjects from the latter groups had become myopic by the end of the study. Nearwork scores derived from the diaries were generally not well correlated with overall myopia progression. CONCLUSIONS: The tendency for myopia progression rates to increase after the final school examinations in 7-year-olds is interpreted as a delayed effect of the intense nearwork associated with preparing for them. The timing of nearwork-diary data collection at the beginning of the study could be responsible for the poor correlation between these data and overall myopia progression rates.     

Role of parental myopia in the progression of myopia and its interaction with treatment in COMET children

PURPOSE: The present study investigated the relationship between parental refractive error and myopia progression in their offspring and the interaction between parental ametropia and the effects of wearing progressive-addition (PALs) or single-vision (SVLs) lenses on the progression of myopia in children enrolled in the Correction of Myopia Evaluation Trial (COMET). METHODS: The progression of myopia in a subset of COMET children (N= 232; 49% of initial group) was defined as the difference in mean spherical equivalent refraction of both eyes obtained by cycloplegic autorefraction between the baseline and 5-year visit. Parental refractions were obtained by noncycloplegic autorefraction (81%) or from recent eye examination records (19%). RESULTS: The number of myopic parents (mean spherical equivalent refraction 相似文献   

The effect of parental history of myopia on eye size of pre-school children: a pilot study

PURPOSE: To evaluate parental history of myopia as a predictor of refractive error and eye size in Chinese pre-school children. METHODS: A total of 514 pre-school children (aged 2.3--6.4 years) were examined. Parental history of myopia, amount of near work performed, refractive status and ocular biometry were recorded. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in spherical equivalent refraction (SER) among children with no myopic parents (mean+0.94+/-0.05 D), one myopic parent (mean+0.77+- 0.07 D) and two myopic parents (mean+0.79+/- 0.12 D) (p=0.102) after controlling for age and amount of near work. Further, children with more myopic parents did not have longer eyeballs (p=0.335). Conclusions: In this study in Chinese pre-school children, parental history of myopia was not found to be associated with a myopic refractive error or increased eyeball length. Further studies with larger sample sizes would help to confirm these results.     

Clinical findings before the onset of myopia in youth: 5. Intraocular pressure.

BACKGROUND: We conducted a study to compare variables in children who were initially emmetropic and subsequently became myopic to those in children who remained emmetropic. This paper investigates intraocular pressure (IOP) in the two groups. Some theories of myopia development suggest a role for elevated IOP in axial elongation of the eye, and some studies have found higher IOPs in myopes than in nonmyopes. METHODS: A cohort of initially emmetropic children were given eye and vision examinations at 6-month intervals over a 3-year period. IOPs were obtained by Goldmann tonometry. RESULTS: The mean IOP for the became-myopic group was 13.9 mm Hg (N = 24; SD = 2.5). The mean IOP for the remained-emmetropic group was 14.7 mm Hg (N = 53; SD = 3.1). The difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Children who became myopic did not show a greater IOP at an examination 6 months or less before the onset of myopia than children who remained emmetropic.     

IQ and the association with myopia in children

PURPOSE: To evaluate the association between intelligence and myopia in children. METHODS: Cycloplegic refraction and ocular biometry parameters, including axial length, vitreous chamber depth, lens thickness, anterior chamber depth, and corneal curvature were obtained in 1204 Chinese school children aged 10 to 12 years from three schools who were participants in the Singapore Cohort Study Of the Risk Factors for Myopia (SCORM). Intelligence quotient (IQ) was assessed using the nonverbal Raven Standard Progressive Matrix test. RESULTS: After controlling for age, gender, school, parental myopia, father's education, and books read per week, myopia (spherical equivalent [SE]) of at least -0.5 D was associated with high nonverbal IQ (highest quartile) versus low IQ (lowest quartile) (odds ratio = 2.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-3.4). Controlling for the same factors, children with higher nonverbal IQ scores had significantly more myopic refractions (-1.86 D for children with nonverbal IQ in the highest quartile compared with -1.24 D for children with nonverbal IQ in the lowest quartile; P = 0.002) and longer axial lengths (24.06 mm versus 23.80 mm; P = 0.022). Nonverbal IQ accounted for a greater proportion of the variance in refraction compared with books read per week. CONCLUSIONS: Nonverbal IQ may be an independent risk factor of myopia, and this relationship may not be explained merely by increased reading (books per week) among myopes. An interesting observation is that nonverbal IQ may be a stronger risk factor for myopia compared with books read per week. The complexity of the relationships between nonverbal IQ, reading, and myopia warrant additional studies to clarify any cause-effect relationship.     

Time spent in outdoor activities in relation to myopia prevention and control: a meta‐analysis and systematic review

Outdoor time is considered to reduce the risk of developing myopia. The purpose is to evaluate the evidence for association between time outdoors and (1) risk of onset of myopia (incident/prevalent myopia); (2) risk of a myopic shift in refractive error and c) risk of progression in myopes only. A systematic review followed by a meta‐analysis and a dose–response analysis of relevant evidence from literature was conducted. PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were searched for relevant papers. Of the 51 articles with relevant data, 25 were included in the meta‐analysis and dose–response analysis. Twenty‐three of the 25 articles involved children. Risk ratio (RR) for binary variables and weighted mean difference (WMD) for continuous variables were conducted. Mantel–Haenszel random‐effects model was used to pool the data for meta‐analysis. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed using the I² test with I² ≥ 50% considered to indicate high heterogeneity. Additionally, subgroup analyses (based on participant's age, prevalence of myopia and study type) and sensitivity analyses were conducted. A significant protective effect of outdoor time was found for incident myopia (clinical trials: risk ratio (RR) = 0.536, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.338 to 0.850; longitudinal cohort studies: RR = 0.574, 95% CI = 0.395 to 0.834) and prevalent myopia (cross‐sectional studies: OR = 0.964, 95% CI = 0.945 to 0.982). With dose–response analysis, an inverse nonlinear relationship was found with increased time outdoors reducing the risk of incident myopia. Also, pooled results from clinical trials indicated that when outdoor time was used as an intervention, there was a reduced myopic shift of ?0.30 D (in both myopes and nonmyopes) compared with the control group (WMD = ?0.30, 95% CI = ?0.18 to ?0.41) after 3 years of follow‐up. However, when only myopes were considered, dose–response analysis did not find a relationship between time outdoors and myopic progression (R² = 0.00064). Increased time outdoors is effective in preventing the onset of myopia as well as in slowing the myopic shift in refractive error. But paradoxically, outdoor time was not effective in slowing progression in eyes that were already myopic. Further studies evaluating effect of outdoor in various doses and objective measurements of time outdoors may help improve our understanding of the role played by outdoors in onset and management of myopia.     

The effect of parental history of myopia on children's eye size and growth: results of a longitudinal study

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of parental myopia on eye size and growth in Chinese children. METHODS: A school-based, cross-sectional survey was performed in Chinese children 5 to 16 years of age. A longitudinal cohort study was conducted 1 year later. The effects of parental myopia, parental education level, and near work performed by the child on the refractive error and ocular biometry of the child were assessed. RESULTS: There were 7560 children enrolled in the initial study (response rate: 76.3%). One year later, 4468 children (response rate: 75.9%) in the original cohort (with the exception of those who had completed primary schooling) were evaluated, to determine eye growth. Although children with a stronger parental history of myopia tended to be less hyperopic before the onset of myopia (spherical equivalent refraction [SER] = 0.43 D, 0.67 D, and 0.68 D in children with two, one, and no myopic parents respectively; P = 0.007), the axial lengths did not follow the same pattern (axial length [AL] = 23.11, 23.07, and 23.15 mm; P = 0.429). Eye growth and myopic shift in refraction occurred more rapidly among children with a stronger parental history of myopia (annual AL growth/myopia progression = 0.37 mm/-0.22 D, 0.26 mm/-0.07 D, and 0.20 mm/-0.02 D in children with two, one, and no myopic parents, respectively; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Ocular biometric data in Chinese children suggest that parental history of myopia influences the growth rate of the eye, rather than its size before the onset of myopia, as previously reported in Caucasian children. Further longitudinal studies involving children of different ethnicities are warranted.     

Family aggregation of high myopia: estimation of the sibling recurrence risk ratio

PURPOSE: To estimate the sibling recurrence risk (KS) and the sibling recurrence risk ratio (lambda(S)) for high myopia in a cohort in the United Kingdom. METHOD: The recurrence risks for myopia and high myopia were estimated in the siblings of 296 randomly selected high myopes ascertained from an optometric practice population. A model using an age of onset of spectacle wear for myopia of 9.1 +/- 0.7 years or younger was developed as a surrogate for high myopia. The influence of parental myopia on the sibling recurrence risk for high myopia was also evaluated. RESULTS: KS was estimated (95% confidence limits) to be 10.0% (5.9, 14.8) and lambdaS to be 4.9 (2.8, 7.6). High myopes without myopic parents were surprisingly common ( approximately 40%) and were less likely to have highly myopic siblings (KS approximately 6%) than those with at least one myopic parent (KS approximately 14%). CONCLUSIONS: The sibling recurrence risk ratio reported herein (lambdaS approximately 4.9) implies that the high penetrance autosomal dominant loci for high myopia identified to date account for only a minority of cases of high myopia in the United Kingdom. Furthermore, high-penetrance autosomal dominant inheritance or even high-penetrance recessive inheritance, per se, cannot account for most cases of high myopia. Instead, it may be necessary to consider high myopia as a "complex disease" resulting from the influence of either alleles of reduced penetrance ("susceptibility genes"), environmental factors, or both.     

A cohort study of incident myopia in Singaporean children

PURPOSE: To determine the risk factors of incident myopia in a school-based cohort study in Singaporean children. METHODS: A 3-year prospective cohort study was conducted in Singaporean school children aged 7 to 9 years in three schools at entry. Chinese children without myopia at baseline (n = 994) were included in the analysis. The main outcome was incident myopia, defined as spherical equivalent (SE) at least -0.75 D based on cycloplegic autorefraction. Other definitions of incident myopia, at least -0.5 D and at least -1.0 D, were also assessed. RESULTS: After controlling for school, age, gender, income, reading in books per week and intelligence quotient (IQ) test scores, we found the relative risk (RR) of incident myopia defined as -0.75 D to be 1.55 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18-2.04) for two versus no myopic parents. The multivariate RR of myopia for IQ in the third versus first tertile was 1.50 (95% CI, 1.19-1.89). However, the RR of incident myopia was 1.01 (95% CI, 0.97-1.05) for every unit increase in books read per week. Similar results were obtained with definitions of -0.5 and -1.0 D for incident myopia. CONCLUSIONS: These data provide new prospective evidence of essential links between parental myopia, IQ scores and subsequent myopia development. However, reading in books per week was not associated with incident myopia.     

Role of genetic factors in the etiology of juvenile-onset myopia based on a longitudinal study of refractive error.

In an attempt to determine the role of genetic factors in the development of myopia, we examined the relationship of infantile refractive error and parental history to juvenile-onset myopia and analyzed 43 pedigrees affected by juvenile-onset myopia. Refraction data collected at regular intervals from a sample of juvenile subjects participating in a 24-year longitudinal study of refractive error were used. Results showed that children with two myopic parents were 6.42 times as likely to become myopic as children with one or no myopic parents. Furthermore, children who had refractions in the lower half of the distribution at 6 to 12 months of age were 4.33 times as likely to develop myopia as children who had refractions in the upper half of the distribution at 6 to 12 months of age. The pedigree analysis indicated that 63% of individuals considered at risk for developing juvenile-onset myopia actually became myopic, with an equal number of affected males and females. These results suggest that juvenile-onset myopia of moderate amounts may be inherited as a complex trait involving both genetic and environmental factors.     

Unequal reduction in visual acuity with positive and negative defocusing lenses in myopes.

Myopes have a reduced accommodative response to negative lenses compared with nonmyopes. Mathematical models predict that the reduced accommodative response is due to a decrease in sensitivity to blur in myopes. We examined the effect of blur induced by positive and negative defocusing lenses on visual acuity in 12 myopes and 12 nonmyopes during cycloplegia for up to +/-3.00 D of defocus in 0.25 D steps. Although nonmyopes showed a symmetrical reduction in visual acuity with positive and negative lenses, the myopic group showed less acuity loss with negative lenses compared with positive lenses. The magnitude of visual acuity loss was lower with negative lenses in myopes compared with nonmyopes. No significant difference in visual acuity with positive lenses was found between myopes and nonmyopes. Residual accommodation (after cycloplegia) was about 0.20 D in both myopes and nonmyopes and was too small to explain the relatively good visual acuity through minus lenses in the myopic group. The reduced accommodative response known to occur in myopes may be due to the relatively small effect that negative lens blur has on their visual acuity.