Development and validation of a new clinical staging system to predict survival for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients: Application of the nomogram

IntroductionSurvival of patients with the same clinical stage varies widely and effective tools to evaluate the prognosis utilizing clinical staging information is lacking. This study aimed to develop a clinical nomogram for predicting survival of patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESCC).Materials and methodsOn the basis of data extracted from the SEER database (training cohort, n = 3375), we identified and integrated significant prognostic factors for nomogram development and internal validation. The model was then subjected to external validation with a separate dataset obtained from Jinling Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (validation cohort, n = 1187). The predictive accuracy and discriminative ability of the nomogram were determined by concordance index (C-index), Akaike information criterion (AIC) and calibration curves. And risk group stratification was performed basing on the nomogram scores.ResultsOn multivariable analysis of the training cohort, seven independent prognostic factors were identified and included into the nomogram. Calibration curves presented good consistency between the nomogram prediction and actual observation for 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS. The AIC value of the nomogram was lower than that of the 8th edition American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM (AJCC) staging system, whereas the C-index of the nomogram was significantly higher than that of the AJCC staging system. The risk groups stratified by CART allowed significant distinction between survival curves within respective clinical TNM categories.ConclusionsThe risk stratification system presented better discriminative ability for survival prediction than current clinical staging system and might help clinicians in decision making.     

Surgical treatment of breast cancer liver metastases - A nationwide registry-based case control study

IntroductionThe benefit of liver resection or ablation for breast cancer liver metastases (BCLM) remains unclear. The aim of the study was to determine survival after isolated BCLM in nationwide cohorts and compare surgical versus systemic treatment regimens.Materials and methodsThe Swedish register for cancer in the liver and the bile ducts (SweLiv) and the National register for breast cancer (NBCR) was studied to identify patients with 1–5 BCLM without extrahepatic spread diagnosed 2009–2016. Data from the registers were validated and completed by review of medical records. A Kaplan-Meier plot and log rank test were used to analyse survival. Prognostic and predictive factors were evaluated by Cox regression analysis.ResultsA surgical cohort (n = 29) was identified and compared to a control cohort (n = 33) receiving systemic treatment only. There was no 90-day mortality after surgery. Median survival from BCLM diagnosis was 77 months (95% CI 41–113) in the surgical cohort and 28 months (95% CI 13–43) in the control cohort, (p = 0.004). There was a longer disease-free interval and more oestrogen receptor positive tumours in the surgical cohort. Surgery was a significant positive predictive factor in univariate analysis while a multivariable analysis resulted in HR 0.478 (CI 0.193–1.181, p = 0.110) for surgical treatment.ConclusionSurgery for BCLM is safe and might provide a survival benefit in selected patients but prospective trials are warranted to avoid selection bias.     

Development and validation of a nomogram for preoperative prediction of level VII nodal spread in papillary thyroid cancer: Radiologic-pathologic correlation

PurposeTo develop and validate a diagnostic nomogram for preoperative prediction of the level VII nodal spread in papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) by incorporating CT features.MethodsA dataset of 7896 patients experiencing thyroidectomy for thyroid cancer was collected retrospectively from two hospitals, and 300 patients were finally included in this study. The CT features of metastatic LN were extracted with a one by one match of radiologic-pathologic correlation. Multivariable binary logistic regression analysis was used to develop predicting model, and then a nomogram was developed utilizing a primary cohort of 152 patients from hospital #1. The nomogram was validated in external cohort of 62 patients from hospital #2 and an independent cohort of 86 patients from hospital #1. The performance of the nomogram was evaluated with respect to its calibration, discrimination.Results531 LNs from 300 patients were analyzed. 42.6% LNs were > 5 mm in short diameter. A total of 7 selected CT features were significantly associated with LN status (P < 0.05), including nodular enhancement, cystic change, calcification and so on. These features were contained in the prediction nomogram. The model showed good discrimination and good calibration, with a C-index of 0.938 (95% CI, 0.913 to 0.963) and 0. 795 (95% CI, 0. 726 to 0.864) for the primary cohort and the validation cohort, respectively. Decision curve analysis demonstrated that the nomogram was clinically applicable.ConclusionsThis nomogram incorporating pathologically relevant CT features has demonstrated a high diagnostic value for predicting level VII nodal spread in PTC. Our work may help thyroid surgeon to decide whether upper mediastinal lymphadenectomy should be performed, which is associated with thoracotomy or other surgery.     

Evaluation of dual-energy CT derived radiomics signatures in predicting outcomes in patients with advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BackgroundTo investigate the prognostic value of dual-energy CT (DECT) based radiomics to predict disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).MethodsFrom January 2014 to December 2018, a total of 156 AGC patients were enrolled and randomly allocated into a training cohort and a testing cohort at a ratio of 2:1. Volume of interest of primary tumor was delineated on eight image series. Four feature sets derived from pre-NAC and delta radiomics were generated for each survival arm. Random survival forest was used for generating the optimal radiomics signature (RS). Statistical metrics for model evaluation included Harrell's concordance index (C-index) and the average cumulative/dynamic AUC throughout follow-up. A clinical model and a combined Rad-clinical model were built for comparison.ResultsThe pre-IU (derived from iodine uptake images before NAC) RS performed best for DFS and OS in the testing cohort (C-indices, 0.784 and 0.698; the average cumulative/dynamic AUCs, 0.80 and 0.77). When compared with the clinical model, the radiomics model had significantly higher C-index to predict DFS in the testing cohort (0.784 vs. 0.635, p < 0.001), but no statistical difference was found for OS (0.698 vs. 0.680, p = 0.473). The combined Rad-clinical models showed improved performance in the testing cohort, with C-indices of 0.810 and 0.710 for DFS and OS, respectively.ConclusionDECT-derived radiomics serves as a promising non-invasive biomarker to predict survival for AGC patients after NAC, providing an opportunity for transforming proper treatment.     

Minimum radial margin in pelvic exenteration for locally advanced or recurrent rectal cancer

PurposeThe aim of this study was to clarify the suitable radial margin (RM) for favourable outcomes after pelvic exenteration (PE), focusing on the discrepancy between the concepts of circumferential resection margin (CRM) and traditional R status.MethodsSeventy-three patients with locally advanced (LARC, n = 24) or locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC, n = 49) who underwent PE between 2006 and 2018 were retrospectively analysed. Patients were histologically classified into the following 3 groups; wide RM (≥1 mm, n = 45), narrow RM (0–1 mm, n = 10), and exposed RM (n = 18). The analysis was performed not only in the entire cohort but also in each disease group separately.ResultsThe rates of traditional R0 (RM > 0 mm) and wide RM were 75.3% and 61.6%, respectively, resulting in the discrepancy rate of 13.7% between the two concepts. Preoperative radiotherapy was given in 12.3%. In the entire cohort, the local recurrence and overall survival (OS) rates for narrow RMs were significantly worse than those for wide RMs (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002), but were similar to those for exposed RMs. In both LARC and LRRC, RM < 1 mm resulted in significantly worse local recurrence and OS rates compared to the wide RMs. Multivariate analysis showed that RM < 1 mm was an independent risk factor for local recurrence in both LARC (HR 15.850, p = 0.015) and LRRC (HR 4.874, p = 0.005).ConclusionsNarrow and exposed RMs had an almost equal impact on local recurrence and poor OS after PE. Preoperative radiotherapy might have a key role to ensure a wide RM.     

Perioperative,short-, and long-term outcomes of gastric cancer surgery: Propensity score-matched analysis of patients with or without prior solid organ transplantation

BackgroundDetails of perioperative outcomes and survival after gastric cancer surgery in prior transplant recipients have received minimal research attention.MethodsWe performed an observational cohort study using the database of 20,147 gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy at a single gastric cancer center in Korea. Forty-one solid organ recipients [kidney (n = 35), liver (n = 5), or heart (n = 1)] were matched with 205 controls using propensity score matching.ResultsOperation time, blood loss, and postoperative pain were similar between groups. Short-term complication rates were similar between transplantation and control groups (22.0% vs. 20.1%, P = 0.777). Transplantation group patients with stage 1 gastric cancer experienced no recurrence, while those with stage 2/3 cancer had significantly higher recurrence risk compared to the controls (P = 0.049). For patients with stage 1 cancer, the transplantation group had a significantly higher rate of non-gastric cancer-related deaths compared to the controls (19.2% vs. 1.4%, P = 0.001). For those with stage 2/3 cancer, significantly lower proportion of the transplantation group received adjuvant chemotherapy compared to the control group (26.7% vs. 80.3%, P < 0.001). The transplantation group had a higher (albeit not statistically significant) rate of gastric cancer-related deaths compared to the controls (40.0% vs. 18.0%, P = 0.087).ConclusionTransplant recipients and non-transplant recipients exhibited similar perioperative and short-term outcomes after gastric cancer surgery. From long-term outcome analyses, we suggest active surveillance for non-gastric cancer-related deaths in patients with early gastric cancer, as well as strict oncologic care in patients with advanced cancer, as effective strategies for transplant recipients.     

Recurrence patterns after curative gastrectomy for pStage II/III gastric cancer: Exploratory analysis of the randomized controlled JCOG1001 trial

BackgroundPeritoneal, lymph node, and hematogenous recurrence patterns are common after potentially curative surgery for gastric cancer. However, clinicopathological characteristics associated with each recurrence type have rarely been comprehensively reported among patients who received a unified treatment strategy and follow-up protocol. Understanding these recurrence patterns would help with early detection of recurrence and a personalized follow-up plan. We investigated the initial recurrence patterns after curative gastrectomy using data from the randomized clinical JCOG1001 trial.MethodsOf 1204 patients enrolled in JCOG1001, 932 pStage II/III patients were included. Initial recurrence dates and patterns were recorded by attending physicians according to the protocol. Risk factors for hematogenous, lymph node, and peritoneal recurrence were determined by univariable and multivariable analyses using the Fine–Gray model.ResultsOverall, 253 patients developed recurrence. Hematogenous recurrence was the most frequent pattern (n = 115), followed by peritoneal (n = 104) and lymph node recurrence (n = 70). Differentiated type (p = 0.0028), pT4 (p = 0.0466), and pN3 (p < 0.0001) were associated with hematogenous recurrence; however, D2+ lymphadenectomy reduced it (p = 0.0161). Patients with large (≥5 cm) tumors (p = 0.0312), pT4 (p < 0.0001), pN3 (p = 0.0013), and undifferentiated histologic type (p = 0.0001) had significantly higher rates of peritoneal recurrence. Extended lymph node metastasis (pN3) was the only risk factor (p < 0.0001) for lymph node recurrence.ConclusionsClinicopathological features differed according to the recurrence patterns. Vigilant follow-up with an understanding of recurrence patterns might be beneficial for some high-risk patients.     

Local recurrences in western low rectal cancer patients treated with or without lateral lymph node dissection after neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy: An international multi-centre comparative study

BackgroundIn the West, low rectal cancer patients with abnormal lateral lymph nodes (LLNs) are commonly treated with neoadjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy (nCRT) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME). Additionally, some perform a lateral lymph node dissection (LLND). To date, no comparative data (nCRT vs. nCRT + LLND) are available in Western patients.MethodsAn international multi-centre cohort study was conducted at six centres from the Netherlands, US and Australia. Patients with low rectal cancers from the Netherlands and Australia with abnormal LLNs (≥5 mm short-axis in the obturator, internal iliac, external iliac and/or common iliac basin) who underwent nCRT and TME (LLND-group) were compared to similarly staged patients from the US who underwent a LLND in addition to nCRT and TME (LLND + group).ResultsLLND + patients (n = 44) were younger with higher ASA-classifications and ypN-stages compared to LLND-patients (n = 115). LLND + patients had larger median LLNs short-axes and received more adjuvant chemotherapy (100 vs. 30%; p < 0.0001). Between groups, the local recurrence rate (LRR) was 3% for LLND + vs. 11% for LLND- (p = 0.13). Disease-free survival (DFS, p = 0.94) and overall survival (OS, p = 0.42) were similar. On multivariable analysis, LLND was an independent significant factor for local recurrences (p = 0.01). Sub-analysis of patients who underwent long-course nCRT and had adjuvant chemotherapy (LLND-n = 30, LLND + n = 44) demonstrated a lower LRR for LLND + patients (3% vs. 16% for LLND-; p = 0.04). DFS (p = 0.10) and OS (p = 0.11) were similar between groups.ConclusionA LLND in addition to nCRT may improve loco-regional control in Western patients with low rectal cancer and abnormal LLNs. Larger studies in Western patients are required to evaluate its contribution.     

Comparison of long term survival outcomes between D1+ and D2 lymph node dissection for ≥ pT2 or pN+ gastric carcinoma: A large scale case-control study using propensity score matching

BackgroundD2 lymph node dissection (LND) is a widely performed as a standard procedure for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). However, there is little evidence supporting D2 over D1+ LND for gastric cancer treatment. This study compared the long-term outcomes of D2 and D1+ LND for AGC.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed data on 1121 patients who underwent curative distal gastrectomy and had pathologic stage of ≥ pT2 or pN+. The patients were categorized into the D1+ and D2 LND groups, and long-term survival was compared in the original and propensity score matching (PSM) cohorts.ResultsOverall, 909 and 212 patients underwent D2 and D1+ LND, respectively. The D2 group showed more advanced stage and more frequently underwent open surgery. Postoperative morbidity was significantly higher in the D2 group (19.5% vs. 13.2%, p = 0.034); however, mortality or ≥ grade III complications did not significantly differ between the groups. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) did not significantly differ between D2 and D1+ groups at the same stage. Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors revealed that the extent of LND did not significantly affect survival, after adjusting for tumor stage and other clinicopathological factors. In the PSM cohort, the D2 and D1 groups showed no significant difference in OS (p = 0.488) and DFS (p = 0.705).ConclusionsLong-term survival with D1+ LND was comparable to that with D2 LND for ≥ pT2 or pN + gastric carcinoma. A large randomized trial is warranted to validate the optimal extent of LND for gastric carcinoma.     

Complications and risk factors in vulvar cancer surgery – A population-based study

IntroductionPrimary surgery for vulvar cancer has become less radical in past decades. This study investigates risk factors and prevalence of short-and long-term complications after up-to-date vulvar cancer surgery.MethodsPopulation-based cohort study of surgically treated primary vulvar cancer at a national center of vulvar cancer, assessing surgical outcome. The Swedish Quality Registry for Gynecological Cancer was used for identification, journals reviewed and surgical outcome including complications within 30 days and one year registered. Multivariable logistic regression analysis comprising risk factors of short-term complications; age>80 years, BMI, smoking, diabetes, lichen sclerosus and FIGO stage was performed.Results182 patients were identified, whereas 55 had vulvar surgery only, 53 surgery including sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and 72 surgery including inguinofemoral lymphadenectomy (IFL), with short-term complication rates of 21.8%, 39.6% and 54.2% respectively. Vulvar wound dehiscence was reported in 6.0% and infection in 13.7%. Complication rates were lower after SLNB than IFL (wound dehiscence 0% vs 8.3%; p = 0.04, infection 15.1% vs 36.1%; p = 0.01 and lymphocele 5.7% vs 9.7%; p = 0.52). Severe complications were rare. Persisting lymphedema evolved in 3.8% after SLNB and in 38.6% after IFL (p = 0.001), ubiquitous after adjuvant radiotherapy. In multivariable regression analysis, no associations between included risk factors and complications were found.ConclusionSurgical complications are still common in vulvar cancer surgery and increase with the extent of groin surgery. To thrive for early diagnosis and to avoid IFL seem to be the most important factors in minimizing short-and long-term complications.     

BCG Administration after Prior Radiation Treatment for Prostate Cancer

IntroductionProstate radiotherapy is associated with worse oncologic outcomes in patients with bladder cancer. The underlying mechanism is incompletely understood but is thought to be related to an altered microenvironment promoting tumorigenesis. However, there is a gap in the literature regarding how the effect of BCG varies according to prior radiotherapy in patients with non–muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). In this context, we sought to evaluate oncologic outcomes in NMIBC patients who have previously undergone prostate radiotherapy compared to patients with no prior history of pelvic radiotherapy.MethodsThis is a retrospective cohort study that includes all patients who received intravesical for NMIBC at our institution from 2001 to 2019. Patients were stratified into 3 cohorts: prior radiotherapy (RT), radical prostatectomy (RP), and no prostate cancer (No PCa). The outcomes of interest were recurrence at 1-year, progression to muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), and progression to metastatic disease. Comparisons were also made between cohorts with respect to elapsed time from radiation therapy. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for comparing continuous variables, while χ² and Fischer's exact tests were used to examine categorical variables.ResultsIn 199 total patients who underwent BCG for NMIBC, 23 had a prior history of prostate radiotherapy treatment, while 17 underwent prior radical prostatectomy. Overall, 41.2% of patients had recurrence at 1 year. There was no difference in the number of induction or maintenance BCG administrations received between the cohorts within the first year. There was no significant difference in recurrence at 1 year between the 3 cohorts (P = .56). There was also no difference in progression to MIBC or progression to metastatic disease with P = .50 and 0.89, respectively.ConclusionThe risk of recurrence after induction BCG treatment for high-grade NMIBC does not vary according to prior radiation treatment for prostate cancer.     

The effect of the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition on breast cancer staging and prognostication

IntroductionBreast cancer staging has been developed to quantify prognosis and guide treatment. The American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition manual (AJCC8) departed from traditional anatomic staging by incorporating biological factors such as grade, hormone and HER2 receptor status into a novel prognostic staging model. The aim of this study was to externally validate AJCC8 prognostic staging.MethodsThis retrospective cohort investigated patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2013 at the McGill University Health Center. Patients were classified using both anatomic and prognostic staging systems according AJCC8. Overall survival analysis using a multivariate Cox-proportional hazard model was performed and model accuracy was evaluated using the Harrell concordance index (C-index) and Akaike Information Criterion (AIC).ResultsThe cohort included 1703 women. Anatomic and prognostic stage assignments displayed discrepancies for 46.2% of patients, where 38.8% were downstaged and 7.5% were upstaged with prognostic staging. Patients with anatomic stages IB, IIA, IIB, IIIA and IIIC had high rates of downstaging (64.6–96.5%), as opposed to anatomic stages IA and IIIB where 93.1% and 75.0% of patients stage remained unchanged, respectively. The prognostic stage displayed increased prognostic accuracy with respect to overall survival, where the C-index was significantly higher compared to anatomic staging (0.810 vs 0.799, p < 0.05). In addition, prognostic staging displayed an improved model fit with a lower AIC (983.9) compared to anatomic staging (995.2).ConclusionPrognostic and anatomic staging differ in their classification of patients, where prognostic staging displays improved accuracy, supporting its use in informing patient prognosis and guiding treatment decisions.     

Survival of surgical and non-surgical older patients with non-metastatic colorectal cancer: A population-based study in the Netherlands

BackgroundSurgery is the primary treatment for non-metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) but is omitted in a proportion of older patients. Characteristics and prognosis of non-surgical patients are largely unknown.ObjectiveTo examine the characteristics and survival of surgical and non-surgical older patients with non-metastatic CRC in the Netherlands.MethodsAll patients aged ≥70 years and diagnosed with non-metastatic CRC between 2014 and 2018 were identified in the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Patients were divided based on whether they underwent surgery or not. Three-year overall survival (OS) and relative survival (RS) were calculated for both groups separately. Relative survival and relative excess risks (RER) of death were used as measures for cancer-related survival.ResultsIn total, 987/20.423 (5%) colon cancer patients and 1.459/7.335 (20%) rectal cancer patients did not undergo surgery. Non-surgical treatment increased over time from 3.7% in 2014 to 4.8% in 2018 in colon cancer patients (P = 0.01) and from 17.1% to 20.2% in rectal cancer patients (P = 0.03). 3 year RS was 91% and 9% for surgical and non-surgical patients with colon cancer, respectively. For rectal cancer patients this was 93% and 37%, respectively. In surgical patients, advanced age (≥80 years) did not decrease RS (colon; RER 0.9 (0.7–1.0), rectum; RER 0.9 (0.7–1.1)). In non-surgical rectal cancer patients, higher survival rates were observed in patients treated with chemoradiotherapy (OS 56%, RS 65%), or radiotherapy (OS 19%, RS 27%), compared to no treatment (OS 9%, RS 10%).ConclusionNon-surgical treatment in older Dutch CRC patients has increased over time. Because survival of patients with colon cancer is very poor in the absence of surgery, this treatment decision must be carefully weighed. (Chemo-)radiotherapy may be a good alternative for rectal cancer surgery in older frail patients.     

The sigmoid take-off as a landmark to distinguish rectal from sigmoid tumours on MRI: Reproducibility,pitfalls and potential impact on treatment stratification

PurposeThe sigmoid take-off (STO) was recently introduced as a preferred landmark, agreed upon by expert consensus recommendation, to discern rectal from sigmoid cancer on imaging. Aim of this study was to assess the reproducibility of the STO, explore its potential treatment impact and identify its main interpretation pitfalls.MethodsEleven international radiologists (with varying expertise) retrospectively assessed n = 155 patients with previously clinically staged upper rectal/rectosigmoid tumours and re-classified them using the STO as completely below (rectum), straddling the STO (rectosigmoid) or completely above (sigmoid), after which scores were dichotomized as rectum (below/straddling STO) and sigmoid (above STO), being the clinically most relevant distinction. A random subset of n = 48 was assessed likewise by 6 colorectal surgeons. .ResultsInterobserver agreement (IOA) for the 3-category score ranged from κ0.19–0.82 (radiologists) and κ0.32–0.72 (surgeons), with highest scores for the most experienced radiologists (κ0.69–0.76). Of the 155 cases, 44 (28%) were re-classified by ≥ 80% of radiologists as sigmoid cancers; 36 of these originally received neoadjuvant treatment which in retrospect might have been omitted if the STO had been applied. Main interpretation pitfalls were related to anatomical variations, borderline cases near the STO and angulation of axial imaging planes.ConclusionsGood agreement was reached for experienced radiologists. Despite considerable variation among less-expert readers, use of the STO could have changed treatment in ±1/4 of patients in our cohort. Identified interpretation pitfalls may serve as a basis for teaching and to further optimize MR protocols.     

The role of surgery for locally recurrent and second recurrent rectal cancer with metastatic disease

BackgroundThe role of surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC) with resectable distant metastases or second LRRC remains unclear. This study aimed to clarify the influence of synchronous distant metastases (SDMs), a history of distant metastasis resection (HDMR), and a second LRRC on the outcome.MethodsThe long-term outcomes of 70 surgically treated patients with LRRC between 2006 and 2018 were compared by SDM (n = 10), HDMR (n = 17), and second LRRC (n = 7).ResultsAmong the 10 patients with SDM, 4 patients underwent simultaneous resection, whereas the other 6 underwent staged resection with distant first approach. Recurrence developed in 9 patients, of which 2 patients with liver re-resection achieved long-term survival without cancer. The patients with and without SDM had equivalent 5-year overall survival rate (40.5% vs. 53.3%, p = 0.519); however, patients with SDM had a worse 3-year recurrence-free survival rate than those without SDM (10.0% vs. 37.5%, p = 0.031). Multivariate analysis showed that primary non-sphincter-preserving surgery, second LRRC, and R1 resection were independent risk factors for overall survival. Similarly, primary non-sphincter-preserving surgery, second LRRC, SDM, and R1 resection were risk factors for recurrence-free survival.ConclusionsPatients with SDM might still be suitable to undergo salvage surgery and achieve favourable overall survival. Distant metastasectomy should be performed first, followed by a sufficient interval to avoid unnecessary LRRC resection in uncurable patients. An HDMR should not be taken into consideration when making surgical plans. Surgical indication of second LRRC should be strict, especially in referred patients.     

Technical,functional, and oncological validity of robot-assisted total-intersphincteric resection (T-ISR) for lower rectal cancer

BackgroundFew studies fairly compared anorectal function and prognostic outcomes between patients undergoing abdominoperineal resection (APR) and anorectal-function-saving operations (ASO) under the equivalent conditions. By contrast, surgeons used to be somewhat hesitant to conduct total intersphincteric resection (T-ISR) as maximal ASO, due to its technical complexity and potential anorectal dysfunction.MethodsPropensity-score matched cohorts undergoing robot-assisted R0 surgery [T-ISR vs APR vs partial-subtotal ISR (PS-ISR)/lower anterior resection (LAR)] for rectal cancer (n = 1361) were included. Operative outcomes, recurrence, and disease-free/overall survival (DFS/OS) were analyzed. Anorectal function was evaluated based on fecal incontinence score and high-resolution manometry between the T-ISR and other ASO groups.ResultsFew differences were detected between the T-ISR and APR groups. More patients undergoing APR had T4 stage disease, while the lowest tumor margin was the same in both groups (mean, 1.5 cm from anal verge). Prognostic outcomes did not differ between the T-ISR and APR groups, including local (5.1% vs 7.7%, p = 1) or systemic (15.4% vs 25.6%, p = 0.401) recurrence, and 5-year DFS (78.7% vs 61.5%, p = 0.1) and OS (89% vs 82.1%, p = 0.434) rates, nor were there differences between the T-ISR and PS-ISR/LAR groups. The PS-ISR group generally showed less anorectal dysfunction than the T-ISR group, but maximal tolerance volume did not differ between these two groups and was within the range for the healthy population.ConclusionsT-ISR can replace most traditional APR, except for advanced T4 disease with aggressive infiltration into the levator-sphincters, and can provide tolerable anorectal dysfunction.     

Implications for restaging in gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis based on the 15th Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma: An analysis from a comprehensive center

Backgroundand purpose: For gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis (GCPM), there is no universally accepted prognostic staging system. This study aimed to validate the predictive ability of the 15th peritoneal metastasis staging system (P1abc) of the Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma (JCGC).MethodsThe data of 309 GCPM patients from July 2007 to July 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. This study compared the prognosis prediction performances of P1abc, the previous JCGC PM staging (P123) and Gilly staging systems.ResultsThe survival curve revealed a significant difference in overall survival (OS) predicted by P1abc, P123 and Gilly staging (all P < 0.05), and the survival of the two adjacent substages were well distinguished by P1abc but not by P123 and Gilly staging. Both P123 and Gilly staging were substituted with P1abc staging in a 2-step multivariate analysis. The results showed that P1abc staging was superior to both P123 and Gilly staging in its discriminatory ability (C-index), predictive accuracy (AIC) and predictive homogeneity (likelihood ratio chi-square). A stratified analysis by different therapies indicated that for the P1a and P1b patients, OS following palliative resection combined with palliative chemotherapy (PRCPC) was better than that after palliative resection (PR) or palliative chemotherapy (PC) alone (P < 0.05). For the P1c patients, OS after receiving PC was significantly superior to that after receiving PRCPC or PR (P = 0.021).ConclusionP1abc staging is superior to P123 and Gilly staging in predicting the survival of GCPM patients. Surgeons can provide these patients with appropriate treatment options according to the corresponding substages within P1abc.     

Predictive value of the Delphian lymph node in cervical lymph node metastasis of papillary thyroid carcinoma

IntroductionDelphian lymph node metastasis (DLNM) has proven to be a risk factor for a poor prognosis in head and neck malignancies. This study aimed to reveal the clinical features and evaluate the predictive value of the Delphian lymph node (DLN) in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) to guide the extent of surgery.MethodsTianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital pathology database was reviewed from 2017 to 2020, and 516 PTC patients with DLN detection were enrolled. Retrospective analysis was performed, while multivariate analysis was performed to identify the risk factors for DLNM.ResultsAmong the 516 PTC patients with DLN detection, the DLN metastasis rate was 25.39% (131/516). Tumor size >1 cm, location in the upper 1/3, central lymph node metastasis (CLNM), lateral lymph node metastasis (LLNM) and lymphovascular invasion were independent risk factors for DLNM. Patients with DLNM had a higher incidence of ipsilateral CLNM, contralateral CLNM (CCLNM) and LLNM, and larger numbers and size of metastatic CLNs than those without DLNM. The incidence of CLNM among cN0 patients with DLNM was higher than that among those without DLNM. The incidence of CCLNM among unilateral cN + patients with DLNM was similarly higher than that among patients without DLNM.ConclusionsDLNM indicates a high likelihood and large number of cervical lymph nodes metastases in PTC patients. Surgeons are strongly recommended to detect DLN status during operation by means of frozen pathology, so as to evaluate the possibility of cervical nodal metastasis and decide the appropriate extent of surgery.     

Comprehensive analysis of prognostic value of lymph node staging classifications in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma after cervical lymph node dissection

PurposeTo determine the optimal threshold of examined lymph node (ELN) number from cervical lymph node dissection for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Further to compare the prognostic value of multiple lymph node classification systems and to determine the most suitable scheme to predict survival.MethodsA total of 20991 HNSCC patients were included. Odds ratios (ORs) for negative-to-positive node stage migration and hazard ratios (HRs) for survival were fitted using the LOWESS smoother. Structural breakpoints were determined by the Chow test. The R square, C-index, likelihood ratio, and Akaike information criterion (AIC) were used to compare the prognostic abilities among AJCC N stage, number of positive lymph nodes (pN), positive lymph node ratio (LNR) and log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) stages.ResultsA minimal threshold ELN number of fifteen had the discriminatory capacities for both stage migration and survival. LODDS stages had the highest R square value (0.208), C-index (0.736) and likelihood ratio (2467) and the smallest AIC value (65874). LODDS stages also showed prognostic value in estimating patients with AJCC N0 stage. A novel staging system was proposed and showed good prognostic performance when stratified by different primary sites.ConclusionFifteen lymph nodes should be examined for HNSCC patients. LODDS stage allows better prognostic stratification, especially in N0 stage. The proposed staging system may serve as precise evaluation tools to estimate postoperative prognoses.