Femoral Neck Exostosis,a Manifestation of Cam/Pincer Combined Femoroacetabular Impingement

We present 2 cases of cam/pincer combined femoroacetabular impingement treated arthroscopically with labral debridement, acetabuloplasty, and femoral head recontouring. In both cases there was essentially no evidence of osteoarthritis of the hip. However, in both cases raised exostoses were evident on the anterolateral femoral neck in the region that commonly comes into contact with the acetabular rim. On the basis of 3-dimensional dynamic reconstructions, we surmise that these exostoses are a direct result of linear contact between the femoral neck and acetabular rim. We recommend that the presence of these exostoses be carefully noted by the arthroscopic hip surgeon and that they be a geographic marker of the zone of contact between the head-neck junction and the acetabular rim and a guide for the area of head osteochondroplasty in combination with appropriate treatment of the acetabular rim.     

Does the Capital Femoral Physis Bony MorphologyDiffer in Children with Symptomatic Cam-type Femoroacetabular Impingement

BackgroundThe epiphyseal tubercle, the corresponding metaphyseal fossa, and peripheral cupping are key stabilizers of the femoral head-neck junction. Abnormal development of these features in the setting of supraphysiologic physeal stress under high forces (for example, forces that occur during sports activity) may result in a cam morphology. Although most previous studies on cam-type femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) have mainly focused on overgrowth of the peripheral cupping, little is known about detailed morphologic changes of the epiphyseal and metaphyseal bony surfaces in patients with cam morphology.Questions/purposes(1) Does the CT-based bony morphology of the peripheral epiphyseal cupping differ between patients with a cam-type morphology and asymptomatic controls (individuals who did not have hip pain)? (2) Does the CT-based bony morphology of the epiphyseal tubercle differ between patients with a cam-type morphology and asymptomatic controls? (3) Does the CT-based bony morphology of the metaphyseal fossa differ between patients with a cam-type morphology and asymptomatic controls?MethodsAfter obtaining institutional review board approval for this study, we retrospectively searched our institutional database for patients aged 8 to 15 years with a diagnosis of an idiopathic cam morphology who underwent a preoperative CT evaluation of the affected hip between 2005 and 2018 (n = 152). We excluded 96 patients with unavailable CT scans and 40 patients with prior joint diseases other than cam-type FAI. Our search resulted in 16 patients, including nine males. Six of 16 patients had a diagnosis of bilateral FAI, for whom we randomly selected one side for the analysis. Three-dimensional (3-D) models of the proximal femur were generated to quantify the size of the peripheral cupping (peripheral growth of the epiphysis around the metaphysis), epiphyseal tubercle (a beak-like prominence in the posterosuperior aspect of the epiphysis), and metaphyseal fossa (a groove on the metaphyseal surface corresponding to the epiphyseal tubercle). A general linear model was used to compare the quantified anatomic features between the FAI cohort and 80 asymptomatic hips (aged 8 to 15 years; 50% male) after adjusting for age and sex. A secondary analysis using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test was performed to assess side-to-side differences in quantified morphological features in 10 patients with unilateral FAI.ResultsAfter adjusting for age and sex, we found that patients with FAI had larger peripheral cupping in the anterior, posterior, superior, and inferior regions than control patients who did not have hip symptoms or radiographic signs of FAI (by 1.3- to 1.7-fold; p < 0.01 for all comparisons). The epiphyseal tubercle height and length were smaller in patients with FAI than in controls (by 0.3- to 0.6-fold; p < 0.02 for all comparisons). There was no difference in tubercle width between the groups. Metaphyseal fossa depth, width, and length were larger in patients with FAI than in controls (by 1.8- to 2.3-fold; p < 0.001 for all comparisons). For patients with unilateral FAI, we saw similar peripheral cupping but smaller epiphyseal tubercle (height and length) along with larger metaphyseal fossa (depth) in the FAI side compared with the uninvolved contralateral side.ConclusionConsistent with prior studies, we observed more peripheral cupping in patients with cam-type FAI than control patients without hip symptoms or radiographic signs of FAI. Interestingly, the epiphyseal tubercle height and length were smaller and the metaphyseal fossa was larger in hips with cam-type FAI, suggesting varying inner bone surface morphology of the growth plate. The docking mechanism between the epiphyseal tubercle and the metaphyseal fossa is important for epiphyseal stability, particularly at early ages when the peripheral cupping is not fully developed. An underdeveloped tubercle and a large fossa could be associated with a reduction in stability, while excessive peripheral cupping growth would be a factor related to improved physeal stability. This is further supported by observed side-to-side differences in tubercle and fossa morphology in patients with unilateral FAI. Further longitudinal studies would be worthwhile to study the causality and compensatory mechanisms related to epiphyseal and metaphyseal bony morphology in pathogenesis cam-type FAI. Such information will lay the foundation for developing imaging biomarkers to predict the risk of FAI or to monitor its progress, which are critical in clinical care planning.Level of EvidenceLevel III, prognostic study.     

Combination of Anterior Acetabular Coverage and Femoral Head Shape Predicts Femoroacetabular Impingement After Periacetabular Osteotomy

BackgroundFemoroacetabular impingement (FAI) after periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) may be affected by both anterior acetabular coverage and femoral head shape. This study aimed to radiographically evaluate the relationship of the combination of acetabular coverage and femoral head shape with the occurrence of FAI after curved PAO.MethodsIn this study, 76 hip joints from patients with symptomatic developmental dysplasia of the hip underwent curved PAO. The relationship between the combined postoperative anterior center-edge and alpha angles (ie, the combination angle) and the occurrence of postoperative FAI was evaluated. Clinical factors and the preoperative and postoperative 3-dimensional center-edge angles, acetabular versions, femoral versions, radiographic alpha angles of the femoral head, and the combination angle were measured and compared to clinical outcomes.ResultsThe modified Harris Hip Scores, University of California, Los Angeles activity scores, and acetabular coverage angles were significantly improved following curved PAO. Receiver operator characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that the combination angle over 108° may be a predictive factor for the occurrence of FAI after curved PAO. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that an age <40 years (odds ratio 6.6, 95% confidence interval 1.2-36.4, P = .037) and a combination angle <108° (odds ratio 9.2, 95% confidence interval 1.7-50.0, P = .010) were significantly associated with modified Harris Hip Scores ≧90 points.ConclusionA combination angle >108° may be a predictive factor for the occurrence of FAI after curved PAO and impaired clinical outcomes. To avoid postoperative FAI, we propose that osteochondroplasty of the femoral head should be performed for patients with preoperative combination angles >90°.     

The Natural History of Osteoid Osteoma

A long-term follow-up of three patients suffering from osteoid osteoma who have not undergone surgery is reported. Only eight similar cases have been reported in the literature. It is shown that over a period of years the pain of osteoid osteoma eventually disappears, but the radiological appearance may remain unaltered or gradually resolve. Surgical management of osteoid osteoma is advised because of the prolonged symptoms.     

Arthroscopic Excision of Osteoid Osteoma of the Elbow

Osteoid osteomas (OOs) are benign tumors; intra-articular lesions are rare, and few localizations at the elbow are reported. We present 2 cases of OO in young patients; both described limited motion, and 1 patient reported pain. Diagnosis was suspected on the basis of computed tomography findings. Arthroscopic exploration of the joint was performed, bony biopsy was undertaken, and excision of the lesion was completed. In both cases, pathologic examination confirmed the diagnosis. The first patient had an excellent clinical result and returned to full activity in 2 weeks. The second patient underwent only partial excision of the lesion, probably because of the technical nature of the procedure (use of the shaver is not indicated in optimal treatment of OO). Arthroscopy is a useful and safe technique for OO excision when specific steps are followed: A shaver must be used only for exposition of big or deep lesions—not for treatment; in addition, bony biopsy must be performed, curettage must be completed with a curette, and a burr should be used at the end of the procedure to destroy hyperemic lesions. Elbow contracture does not have to be treated because it is directly related to the osteoma, and excision of the osteoma will restore full mobility.     

Osteoid Osteoma: report of a case

A case is reported in which osteoid osteoma was diagnosed chiefly through radiographic evidence in a forty-three-year-old male. It is one of the many cases where neurologic, serologic, and orthopaedic testing were insufficient to provide a definite diagnosis without the aid of radiographic examination. The author explains the radiographic techniques employed in this and other similar cases as well as the follow up treatment for this particular patient.