Restoration of pedicle screw fixation with an in situ setting calcium phosphate cement

STUDY DESIGN: Pedicle screws were pulled out of human cadaveric vertebrae before and after augmentation with polymethylmethacrylate or in situ-setting calcium phosphate cement. The fixation strength of screws augmented with calcium phosphate cement was compared with that of screws augmented with polymethylmethacrylate. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether a new in situ-setting calcium phosphate cement might be suitable for augmenting the fixation of pedicle screws. The principle objective was to compare the pull-out resistance of screws augmented with calcium phosphate cement with the pull-out behavior of screws augmented with polymethylmethacrylate. Polymethylmethacrylate augmentation was chosen as the standard because of its current clinical use. Five types of screws were tested to determine whether screw design had an effect on the efficacy of augmentation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although many factors affect the pull-out resistance of pedicle screws, a key determinant of their performance is the strength of their attachment to the spine. In elderly, osteopenic patients, the screw-bone interface is especially at risk for stripping during insertion or pull-out after surgery. In these patients, polymethylmethacrylate has been used to augment pedicle screw fixation, although its use is not without risk. In situ-setting calcium phosphate cements may provide an alternative to polymethylmethacrylate in this application. Like polymethylmethacrylate, calcium phosphate cements can be injected into the prepared screw hole. They have the added advantage of being resorbed and replaced during healing and normal bone remodeling. METHODS: Thirty human lower lumbar vertebrae (L3-L5) were implanted bilaterally with one of five types of pedicle screws (n = 6 for each screw type). The screws were pulled out 3.0 mm at 0.25 mm/sec with a servohydraulic materials testing machine. The 3.0-mm pull-out distance, which was slightly longer than one thread pitch, was designed to strip the screw-bone interface but to leave the pedicle otherwise intact. After the initial testing, the screws in each vertebrae were removed, and the screw tracks were filled with 2.0 cc of polymethylmethacrylate (one side) or calcium phosphate cement (contralateral side). After augmentation, the screws were reinserted, and the cements were allowed to harden for 24 hours. Postaugmentation testing followed the protocols for preaugmentation testing, and the pull-out resistance of screws augmented with calcium phosphate cement was compared with the pull-out resistance of screws augmented with polymethylmethacrylate. RESULTS: Mechanically, calcium phosphate cement compared favorably with polymethylmethacrylate for augmenting pedicle screws. Both restored the strength of the screw-bone interface: across all screw types, the average increase in pull-out strength was 147% with polymethylmethacrylate augmentation and 102% with calcium phosphate cement. There were no significant differences because of screw type with either type of augmentation. CONCLUSIONS: The in situ-setting calcium phosphate cement investigated in this study compared favorably with polymethylmethacrylate in a single-cycle, pull-out test of augmented pedicle screws in senile trabecular bone. With further evaluation, this cement may offer an alternative to polymethylmethacrylate for the enhancement of pedicle screw fixation clinically.     

Carbonated apatite cement augmentation of pedicle screw fixation in the lumbar spine

STUDY DESIGN: Biomechanical testing with human cadaveric lumbar vertebral bodies was used to determine the utility of an injectable carbonated apatite cancellous bone cement for improving the structural performance of pedicle screws subjected to axial pull-out or transverse cyclic loading. OBJECTIVES: To ascertain whether augmentation with a carbonated apatite cement can enhance pedicle screw fixation in the lumbar spine. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The beneficial effects of polymethylmethacrylate augmentation on pedicle screw pull-out strength have been demonstrated. Cancellous bone cement, however, may provide an attractive alternative in this application, as it is remodelable, biocompatible, and nonexothermic. METHODS: Forty-three cadaveric lumbar vertebral bodies were instrumented with pedicle screws. In 20 of these specimens, axial pull-out strength was compared between the control screws and those augmented with cancellous bone cement. In the remaining 23 specimens, the screws were loaded in the superior-inferior direction with a peak displacement of +/- 1 mm at a frequency of 3 Hz for 5000 cycles. Three parameters were calculated from the force-versus-time data: 1) the energy dissipated, 2) the peak force at the start of the test, and 3) the peak force at the end of 5000 cycles. RESULTS: The pull-out strength of the augmented pedicles averaged 68% greater than that of the control side. In response to cyclic loading, all measures of bio-mechanical performance improved 30-63%. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that augmentation with this carbonated apatite cancellous bone cement can enhance immediate screw fixation.     

Computer-aided pedicle screw placement using frameless stereotaxis

STUDY DESIGN: In vitro assessment of accuracy and reliability of frameless stereotaxis for insertion of pedicle screws in human cadaveric lumbar spine. OBJECTIVES: To assess a new method of targeting and placing pedicle screws in a human cadaver study. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Pedicle screw instrumentation is common. Complications may occur from improper placement of screws. Even when performed by experienced spinal surgeons, improper placement can occur in 5.2% of pedicles instrumented. Development of computer-guided methods of pedicle screw insertion may decrease this complication rate. METHODS: The technique used preoperative computed tomography scans together with a commercial neurosurgical navigational computer system to assist in placing guidewires in the pedicles. A section of human cadaver spine was first scanned and the data transferred to the workstation. The image data set and physical specimen were then registered by using an instrumented articulated arm to identify selected points on the specimen and randomly sample surface points. Eight highly repeatable locations on each vertebral body were found to be suitable for registration, but better overall accuracy was obtained when surface matching was used in combination with these points. Under guidance of image on the computer, Kirschner wires were inserted into the pedicles of four vertebral bodies. The spine was rescanned, and the planned and resulting positions of the wires compared. RESULTS: The average distance between the planned and resulting wire entry point was 1.2 mm, with an average difference in planned and resulting trajectories of 6.0 degrees. CONCLUSIONS: Computer-aided pedicle screw instrumentation is feasible. Further technical points require clarification before widespread use is possible.     

Insertional torque and pull-out strengths of conical and cylindrical pedicle screws in cadaveric bone

STUDY DESIGN: Insertion torque and pull-out strengths of conical and cylindrical pedicle screws were compared in human cadaveric vertebral bodies. OBJECTIVES: To compare the performance of the conical design with the cylindrical design, and to determine whether insertional torque correlates with pull-out strength. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A tapered pedicle screw design may lessen the likelihood of implant failure. Its effect on thread purchase is not known. Previous studies of cylindrical designs on the relation between insertion torque and pull-out strength have been conducted in bovine and synthetic bone. METHODS: Seventy-eight pedicles were assigned randomly to one of the following pedicle screw: Texas Scottish Rite Hospital (Sofamor-Danek, Memphis, TN), Steffee VSP (Acromed, Cleveland, OH), Diapason (Dimso, Paris, France), AO Schanz (Synthes, Paoli, PA), or Synthes USS (Synthes, Paoli, PA). Pedicle screws were inserted with a torque screwdriver. Each screw was extracted axially from the pedicle at a rate of 1.0 mm/sec until failure using an MTS machine (Bionix 858, Minneapolis, MN). Force data were recorded. RESULTS: The conical design had the highest insertion torque. There were no significant differences in pull-out between any of the screw types. Correlation between insertional torque and pull-out strength was statistically significant only with the Texas Scottish Rite Hospital and Steffee VSP in L4 and AO Schanz in L5. CONCLUSIONS: A conical screw profile increases insertion torque, although insertional torque is not a reliable predictor of pull-out strength in cadaveric bone. Screw profile (with similar dimensions) has little effect on straight axial pull-out strengths in cadaveric bone.     

Regional and distant metastases in laryngeal and hypopharyngeal sarcomas

OBJECTIVE: To determine risk of failure of the Synthes 4.5-mm cannulated screw system instrumentation in equine bone and to compare its application with the Synthes 4.5-mm standard cortex screw system. STUDY DESIGN: The maximum insertion torque of the cannulated and standard cortex screw systems were compared with the ultimate torsional strengths of the equipment. Pullout strength and ultimate tensile load of cannulated and standard cortex screws were also determined. SAMPLE POPULATION: Paired equine cadaver third metacarpal and third carpal bones. METHODS: Maximum insertion torque and ultimate torsional strengths were determined by using an axial-torsional, servohydraulic materials testing system and a hand-held torquometer. Pullout tests were performed by using a servohydraulic materials testing system. RESULTS: Maximum insertion torque of all cannulated instrumentation was less than ultimate torsional strength at all locations (P < .05). Maximum insertion torques of cannulated taps and screws were greater than for standard taps and screws in the third carpal bone (P < .002). Pullout strength of the cannulated screws was less than the standard cortex screws at all sites (P < .001). Cannulated screws broke before bone failure in all but one bone specimen. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of cannulated instrument or screw failure during insertion into bone is theoretically low. The relatively low pullout strength of the cannulated screws implies that the interfragmentary compression achievable is likely to be less than with standard cortex screws. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The relatively low pullout strength of the cannulated screw suggests that its risk of failure during fracture repair is greater than with the standard cortex screw.     

Accuracy of using computed tomography to identify pedicle screw placement in cadaveric human lumbar spine

STUDY DESIGN: Utility of using computed tomography to predict pedicle screw misplacement. OBJECTIVE: This study defines the sensitivity and specificity of predicting pedicle screw placement by experienced clinicians using a CT scan image. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: In clinical and research settings, the method most commonly used to evaluate pedicle screws placement has been computed tomography. However, no current literature describes the accuracy of this method of evaluating screw placement. METHOD: Cobalt-chrome and titanium alloy pedicle screws of identical size were placed in six cadaveric human lumbar spine. Wide laminectomy was performed to allow complete visualization of the pedicles. Three consecutive lumbar levels were instrumented in each spine, giving 36 pedicle screw placements to identify. The instrumented spines were imaged, and four orthopaedic spine surgeons and a musculoskeletal radiologist were asked to read the images to identify the accuracy of screw placement within the pedicles. RESULTS: The sensitivity rate of identifying a misplaced screw was 67 +/- 6% for cobalt-chrome screws compared with 86 +/- 5% for titanium screws (P < 0.005). The specificity rates of radiographic diagnosis of misplaced pedicle screws were 66 +/- 10% for cobalt-chrome screws and 88 +/- 8% for titanium screws (P < 0.005). Similarly, a statistically significant difference was found in the sensitivity rates of identifying screws placed correctly in the pedicle: 70 +/- 10% for cobalt-chrome screws versus 89 +/- 8% for titanium screws (P < 0.005). Overall accuracy rates were 68 +/- 7% for cobalt chrome screws versus 87 +/- 3% for titanium screws (P < 0.002). CONCLUSION: Reliance on the computed tomography scan data alone in determining accuracy of pedicle screws can lead to inaccuracies in both clinical and research conditions.     

In vitro simulation. Early results of stereotaxy for pedicle screw placement

STUDY DESIGN: Frameless stereotaxy with doppler ultrasound and three dimensional computer model registration is assessed in vitro for pedicle screw placement. OBJECTIVE: To identify feasibility of pedicle screw navigation and placement using this technology. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Inaccurate pedicle screw placement can lead to neurovascular injury or suboptimal fixation. Present techniques in pedicle screw placement involve only confirmation of hole orientation. METHOD: Forty-four pedicle screws were placed in lumbosacral models and cadaver specimens. Accuracy was assessed with a computed tomography scan and vertebral cross sectioning. RESULTS: All screws were intrapedicular. Accuracy of anterior cortical fixation was 1.5 mm, with a range of 2.5 mm. CONCLUSION: In vitro frameless stereotaxy is accurate for pedicle screw placement. This technology adds a component of navigation to pedicle screw placement.     

Structural characteristics of the pedicle and its role in screw stability

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional regional bone mineral density of the pedicle was measured by peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Biomechanical tests were performed to clarify the role of the pedicle in screw stability. OBJECTIVES: To identify the structural characteristics of the pedicle that supports pedicle screw stability and the differences in these characteristics between normal and osteoporotic vertebrae. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The pedicle screw is an essential component of many systems used to align the spine. The contribution of the pedicle to screw stability, however, has not been fully investigated. METHODS: Trabecular, subcortical, and cortical bone mineral density and the area of the pedicle were measured by peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Bone mineral density also was recalculated in four circumferential layers. These parameters were compared between normal and osteoporotic individuals. The relative contribution of the pedicle to screw stability was evaluated by caudocephalad and pull-out loading in a vertebra with or without its body. RESULTS: Inner trabecular, middle subcortical, and outer cortical bone mineral density and cortical bone area in the pedicle were significantly lower in osteoporotic vertebrae than those in normal vertebrae. In the pedicle, bone mineral density increased close to the outer layer. Bone mineral density not as thick even in the outer layer in osteoporotic subjects. Approximately 80% of the caudocephalad stiffness and 60% of the pullout strength of the pedicle screw depended on the pedicle rather than on the vertebral body. CONCLUSION: Screw stability depends on the structural characteristics of the pedicle. The pedicle was denser in the subcortical bone, in which the threads of the screw engage, than in trabecular bone. In osteoporosis, bone mineral density was not as dense even in the outer layer, and the cortex was thinner than normal. A larger screw would not enhance screw stability and may break the thin cortex in osteoporotic vertebrae.     

Revision pedicle screws. Bigger, longer shims--what is best?

STUDY DESIGN: To evaluate the effect of change in screw dimensions and hole augmentation in pedicle screw revisions, the insertional torque was determined, and results were compared with those in control specimens in an in vitro study using cadaveric thoracolumbar spines. OBJECTIVES: To determine the best method of salvage for failed pedicle screws, by evaluating the insertional torque after placing a larger diameter or longer screw into a stripped hole. Use of a shim and use of larger and longer screws were also investigated. Finally, the effect on insertional torque of simply removing and replacing a pedicle screw in its original hole was investigated. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The effects of using bigger or longer screws and shims to salvage failed pedicles have been studied. The interaction between how much larger, how much longer, and inserting with or without shims, has not been well studied. Optimizing reinsertional torque through the use of bigger screws risks exceeding the pedicle capacity. Using longer screws risks violation of the anterior vertebral body, thereby placing the great vessels and viscera at risk. By knowing the relative contribution of increase in length and diameter, the surgeon can optimize the risk-benefit ratio. METHODS: Eight cadaveric spines from T10 to S1 were harvested. The specimens underwent radiographic screening and bone densitometry. A modified Latin square randomization was designed to evaluate the screw diameters and lengths. Each pedicle was its own control. A 35- x 6.5-mm screw was used as a control. Test screws were placed after pedicle screw hole failure was achieved and documented by stripping. For the test screws, the diameters were increased by 1 mm and 2 mm, the lengths were increased by 5 mm and 10 mm. Shims were added randomly. The peak insertional torque was measured for each control screw and test screw placement. In addition, during each screw placement, the screw was removed and replaced to determine the effect. RESULTS: Insertional torque, after the pedicle screw is removed and replaced in the same hole, was decreased by 34% (P < 0.000005). Increasing the diameter of the salvage screw by 2 mm caused the insertional torque to be increased by 8.4% of the original. Increasing the length of the screw did not improve the salvage screw insertional torque. There was an interaction effect for the 1-mm increase in diameter and the increase in length. At this diameter, increasing the length had a significant effect (P = 0.009) on the salvage torque. Using a shim created no improvement in salvage insertional torque (P = 0.77). There was a poor linear correlation between torque and bone mineral density (r = 0.18) in these osteoporotic specimens. CONCLUSIONS: Removing and replacing a pedicle screw in its original hole substantially decreases its mechanical fixation. For pedicle salvage, increasing the diameter causes the greatest restoration of strength. Shims had no effect in pedicle salvage in osteoporotic specimens.     

Pedicle screw placement using image guided techniques

Clinical evaluation of a computer assisted spine surgical system is presented. Eighty pedicle screws were inserted using computer assisted technology in thoracic and lumbar vertebrae for treatment of different types of disorders including fractures, spondylolisthesis, and scoliosis. Fifty-two patients with severe fractures, spondylolisthesis, or pseudoarthrosis of T10 to L5 were treated using a computer assisted technique on 1/2 the patients and performing the screw insertion manually for the other 1/2. At the same time, 28 pedicle screws were inserted in T12 to L4 vertebrae for scoliosis with the help of the computer assisted technique. Surgery was followed in all cases (66 vertebrae; 132 pedicle screws) by postoperative radiographs and computed tomographic examination, on which measurements of screw position relative to pedicle position could be done. For fractures, spondylolisthesis, or pseudarthrosis, comparison between the two groups showed that four screws in 52 (8%) vertebrae had incorrect placement with computer assisted technique whereas 22 screws in 52 (42%) vertebrae had incorrect placement with manual insertion. In patients with scoliosis, four screws in 28 (14%) vertebrae had incorrect placement. In all of the patients (132 pedicle screws) there were no neurologic complications. These results show that a computer assisted technique is much more accurate and safe than manual insertion.     

Internal fixation of the spine in traumatic and scoliotic cases. The potential of pedicle screws

Internal fixation techniques are in common used to stabilize vertebral fractures and correct severe scoliosis. Consolidation of injured vertebrae with neighbouring intact vertebra is the goal in the former case whilst fusion of the vertebrae in a corrected position is aimed at in the latter case. Degenerative spine diseases are not considered in this paper. Classical instrumentation consists of rods (e.g., Cotrel-Dubousset, Harrington, Luque-Galveston) attached to the bone by means of hooks or wires. More recently, transpedicular screws are introduced as an alternative bone/implant interface. Comparing the results of several studies, the posterior pedicle screw based devices demonstrate the ability to produce the most rigid constructs. However, the insertion of pedicle screws implicates a relatively high complication risk and its success strongly depends on the experience of the surgeon. Incorrect drilled holes or malplacement of the screws can result in nerve root injuries and fracture of the pedicle. Studies reported complication ratios up to 30% with substantial neurological implications. A certain degree of automation of the critical actions may be necessary to enhance the safety of pedicle screw insertion. Two techniques of computer assisted spine surgery are compared. Both techniques permit a computer assisted surgical planning based on CT images. During operation the first system permanently observes the position of the drill relative to the spine and informs the surgeon on the deviation of the actual drill path to the planned drill path. The second system uses a pre-operative surgical planning to design and construct a mechanical drill guide, fitting perfectly on the patient's spine.     

Biomechanical comparison of C1-C2 posterior fixations. Cable, graft, and screw combinations

STUDY DESIGN: Four combinations of cable-graft-screw fixation at C1-C2 were compared biomechanically in vitro using nondestructive flexibility testing. Each specimen was instrumented successively using each fixation combination. OBJECTIVES: To determine the relative amounts of movement at C1-C2 after instrumentation with various combinations of one or two transarticular screws and a posterior cable-secured graft. Also to determine the role of each component of the construct in resisting different types of loading. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Spinal stiffness increases after instrumentation with two transarticular screws plus a posterior wire-graft compared with a wire-graft alone. Other C1-C2 cable-graft-screw combinations have not been tested. METHODS: Eight human cadaveric occiput-C3 specimens were loaded nondestructively with pure moments, and nonconstrained motion at C1-C2 was measured. The instrumented states tested were a C1-C2 interposition graft attached with multistranded cable; a cable-graft plus one transarticular screw; two transarticular screws alone; and a cable-graft plus two transarticular screws. RESULTS: The transarticular screws prevented lateral bending and axial rotation better than the posterior cable-graft. The cable-graft prevented flexion and extension better than the screws. Increasing the number of fixation points often significantly decreased the rotation and translation (paired t test; P < 0.05). Axes of rotation shifted from their normal location toward the hardware. CONCLUSIONS: It is mechanically advantageous to include as many fixation points as possible when atlantoaxial instability is treated surgically.     

Chance fracture after pedicle screw fixation. A case report

STUDY DESIGN: A case of a Chance fracture through an instrumented pedicle is presented. The radiographic and intraoperative findings and management of this complication are reported. OBJECTIVE: To increase awareness of the complications of transpedicular screw fixation and to suggest a form of management of this unusual complication. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: To the authors' knowledge, this is the first reported case of such a vertebral fracture occurring after pedicle screw fixation. METHODS: A 44-year-old man with athetoid cerebral palsy and a progressive thoracic kyphosis sustained a Chance fracture at the caudal end of the segmental instrumentation construct. RESULTS: Surgical intervention, including fracture reduction and extension of the instrumented fusion to the pelvis, provided effective restoration of physiologic sagittal alignment. CONCLUSION: Chance fracture after pedicle screw fixation can be successfully managed with surgical intervention.     

Anterior vertebral body screw pullout testing. A comparison of Zeilke, Kaneda, Universal Spine System, and Universal Spine System with pullout-resistant nut

STUDY DESIGN: A biomechanical study of pullout of anteriorly implanted screws in cadaveric vertebral bodies. OBJECTIVES: To investigate and compare the pullout strength of the Zielke, Kaneda, Universal Spine System (USS) pedicle screw, and USS pedicle screw with a new pullout-resistant nut. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A common problem with anterior purchase regardless of the implant system is screw pullout at the proximal and distal ends of multilevel constructs. There is limited information on a solution to this problem. METHODS: The L1 to L4 vertebral bodies from four cadavers had one each of Zielke and Kaneda pedicle screws (Acromed Corp., Cleveland, OH), USS pedicle screw (Synthes Spine, Paoli, PA), and USS pedicle screw with pullout-resistant nut implanted transversely across the center of the vertebral body with bicortical purchase in a similar fashion as would be used clinically. The screws were extracted using a servohydraulic material testing system. The maximum axial forces were recorded. RESULTS: The Zielke and Kaneda screws had no significant difference in mean pullout strength (P = 0.542). The USS screw alone was less strong (P = 0.009). The USS screw and pullout-resistant nut increased the pullout strength by twofold (P = 0.00006). In the screw pullout tests, the mode of failure was at the screw thread's interface. The USS screw and pullout-resistant nut failed by imploding the body around the nut. With the USS screw and pullout-resistant nut, the pullout strength was determined by the compressive strength of the bone. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of a pullout-resistant nut to an anterior vertebral body screw improves the pullout strength by twofold and changes the mode of failure to rely ultimately on the inherent vertebral body strength rather than the screw's characteristics. The addition of a pullout-resistant nut may be applicable to multilevel implant constructs to prevent screw pullout at the top and bottom.     

Stenting of "unprotected" left main coronary artery stenoses: early and late results

The effect of bone plug length and Kurosaka screw (DePuy, Warsaw, IN) diameter on graft holding strength of the bone-tendon-bone construct was determined. Random length porcine bone plugs were assigned to fixation with 7 or 9 mm Kurosaka screws. Peak load to failure was determined. There was a significant decrease in peak load to failure of the 5-mm long bone plugs compared with longer bone plugs. No difference was found between longer lengths of bone plug in either the 7- or 9-mm screw diameter groups. The 9-mm diameter screws significantly increased peak load to failure for both 1- and 2-cm bone plug lengths.     

Anterior transpedicular fixation of the lower thoracic and lumbar spine. Experimental verification using a new direction finder

Currently, no anterior spinal implant provides a strong bone-screw interface because of the cancellous characteristics of the vertebral body. A more secure anchorage could be obtained by anterior transpedicular screw fixation. Four hundred transpedicular screws located between T7 and L5 were placed using the newly developed direction finder. Measurements were obtained directly from radiographs of the cadaveric specimens. In 10 cases (2.5%), the screws crossed the medial pedicle border, but never by more than 1.4 mm. A lateral protrusion was noted in another 41 screws (10%), with no protrusion greater than 2.2 mm. Encroachments beyond the superior or inferior border were not observed. The mean angle of the screws at each level measured between 7 and 19 in the transverse plane and between 2 and 4.5 in the sagittal plane. This technique should be reserved for vertebrae without significant arthritic changes. The rare screw with minimal infraction through the medial or lateral pedicle wall should not cause any vascular or neural compromise. The anterior transpedicular screw technique appeared relatively safe (88%) and encouraged the development of the new plate system for anterior spinal stabilization.     

Safety and accuracy of transarticular screw fixation C1-C2 using an aiming device. An anatomic study

STUDY DESIGN: In this anatomic study, the safety and accuracy of C1-C2 transarticular screw placement was tested in a normal anatomic situation in cadaver specimens using a specially designed aiming device. OBJECTIVES: To assess the safety and accuracy of transarticular screw placement using the technique described by Magerl and a specially designed aiming device. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Transarticular C1-C2 screw fixation has been shown to be biomechanically superior to posterior C1-C2 wiring techniques. Several clinical series have been reported in the literature. However, no previous study assessing the accuracy or safety of this technique has been published. Structures at risk are the vertebral arteries, spinal canal, and the occiput-C1 joint. METHODS: Five frozen human cadaveric specimens were thawed and instrumented with 10 C1-C2 transarticular screws, according to the technique described by Magerl but using a specially designed aiming device described by the senior author (Jeanneret). After screw placement, the accuracy of screw positioning and the distance of the screws from the spinal canal, vertebral arteries, and atlanto-occipital joint were determined by anatomic dissection and radiographic analysis. RESULTS: The structure at greatest risk was the atlanto-occipital joint, with one screw found to be damaging the joint. Vertebral artery or spinal canal penetration was not observed in any of the specimens. Screw length averaged 45 mm and, with proper length, the screw tip was found to be located approximately 7.5 mm behind the anterior tubercle of C1 on lateral radiographs. CONCLUSIONS: This anatomic study demonstrates that C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation can be performed safely in a normal anatomic situation by surgeons who are familiar with the pertinent anatomy. The aiming device allowed safe instrumentation in all patients. In case of an irregular anatomic situation (e.g., congenital abnormalities or trauma), computed tomographic scan with sagittal reconstruction is recommended-in particular, to obtain information about the course of the vertebral artery.     

Complications of pediatric thoracolumbar and lumbar pedicle screws

STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective review of 223 consecutive cases (1986-1996) from one institution where 759 thoracolumbar and lumbar pedicle screws were used in the treatment of various pediatric spinal disorders in patients less than 18 years of age. OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence of short- and long-term (> 2 years follow-up) complications in this group of patients-specifically, complications related to instrumentation and those directly attributable to pedicle screws in these pediatric patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although much has been written regarding the use of pedicle screws in the adult population, no published study has examined complication rates with regard to thoracolumbar and lumbar pedicle screws placed for pediatric spinal disorders. METHODS: A retrospective review of 223 consecutive cases involving 759 pedicle screws placed for a variety of pediatric spinal disorders was performed. Complications were divided into short term and long term (> 2 years follow-up) and into those relating to instrumentation and those relating to pedicle screws specifically. RESULTS: Short-term complication occurred in 5 patients (2.2%) for a total of 17 screws ultimately removed. Only two of these patients had screws removed for lumbar radicular complaints. No residual sequellae resulted. No long-term (> 2 years postoperative) complications were noted. CONCLUSION: Low short- and long-term complication rates specific for pediatric pedicle screws suggests that for properly trained spinal surgeons, pedicle screws fixation in the pediatric population can be performed safely to treat a variety of spinal disorders.     

Cytotoxic scalarane sesterterpenes from a sponge, Hyrtios erecta

PURPOSE: Claimed clinical advantages of the locking-head mandibular reconstruction plating system include the ability to achieve stability with fewer numbers of screws per bony segment as compared with conventional screws. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that increased resistance to displacement will be obtained when using locking-head as compared with the same number of conventional screws per segment in both fracture and reconstruction models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight groups were tested based on the screw number (two or four), screw type (locking-head or conventional), and fracture (bony apposition) or reconstruction model (1-cm defect). Two-dimensional beam mechanics using adult bovine ribs and the Instron machine were used to develop a load-displacement curve up to 150 N for each specimen. An osteotomy was then created and the segments were reduced, with preload (fracture model) or with a 1-cm defect (reconstruction model), and plated using the Synthes locking-head plate with either two or four bicortical locking-head (4.0-mm) or conventional (2.7-mm) screws per segment. The fixed ribs were loaded to 150 N, and the displacement was recorded. RESULTS: Locking-head screws provided superior resistance when using two screws per segment in the reconstruction model as compared with conventional screws. Minimal difference was seen between other screw types within a model. The fracture model offered significantly greater (3.1 to 3.7X) resistance to displacement than did the reconstruction model. CONCLUSIONS: Locking-head screws provided significantly increased resistance to displacement when only two screws per segment were used in the reconstruction model. When four screws per segment were used, there was no significant difference between locking-head and conventional screw types in either model. The effect of bony buttressing is significant and may explain why miniplates often fail in the atrophic mandible but are successful in the fully dentate patient.     

Bone registration method for robot assisted surgery: pedicle screw insertion

A registration method that identifies bone geometry with respect to a robotic manipulator arm is presented. Although the method is generally applicable to many orthopaedic internal fixation procedures, it was only demonstrated for the insertion of pedicle screws in vertebral bodies for spine fixation. The method relies upon obtaining an impression of the vertebral bodies. Computerized tomography (CT) scans of both vertebrae and mould are reconstructed using a computer aided engineering (CAE) system. From the reconstructions, the surgeon is able to do preoperative planning including selection of pedicle screw diameter, direction of screw through pedicle, point of entry and length of engagement. The three-dimensional models are than meshed to determine positions of the surgeon's preoperative plan relative to the mould. Intra-operative positions are defined in space by a mechanical fixture rigidly attached to the mould and designed to allow a manipulator end-effector to recognize the global coordinates of the in vivo spine. The theory and methodology were validated using a five-axis manipulator arm. This initial presentation assumes and allows no relative motion between vertebrae in vivo.