泮托拉唑与法莫替丁治疗脑出血并发应激性溃疡出血疗效观察

目的 观察泮托拉唑治疗脑出血并发应激性溃疡出血的疗效。方法 随机将87例患者分为泮托拉唑组45例，法莫替丁组42例，进行对比观察。结果 两组患者均有明显止血效果，泮托拉唑组用药3d止血成功率75.6％，止血总成功率91.1％。法莫替丁组分别为47．6％和76．2％，泮托拉唑组显著高于法莫替丁组（P〈0．05）。结论 泮托拉唑治疗脑出血并发应激性溃疡，疗效确切，且无明显不良反应，疗效明显优于法莫替丁。     

丘脑出血患者应用谷氨酰胺联合泮托拉唑的治疗方案对预防应激性溃疡发生及其预后的影响

目的探讨谷氨酰胺联合泮托拉唑对丘脑出血预防应激性溃疡及预后的影响.方法回顾性分析2012-05/2017-05鄞州第二医院收治的130例丘脑出血患者的临床资料,其中60例患者给予泮托拉唑方案预防应激性溃疡,将其作为对照组,70例患者使用谷氨酰胺联合泮托拉唑方案预防应激性溃疡,将其作为观察组.然后将两组患者的胃液pH值、血浆促肾上腺皮质激素(adreno-cortico-tropichormone,ACTH)、血浆皮质醇(cortisol,Cor)等指标、应激性溃疡发生率、出血持续时间及死亡率等进行比较.结果在治疗后1 wk,观察组患者的胃液p H值明显高于对照组(5.19±0.81 vs 3.03±0.91),观察组患者的血浆ACTH、Cor浓度明显低于对照组(18.68±1.56vs 25.22±2.58、431.5±213.1 vs 579.9±209.6),差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);在治疗后2 wk,观察组患者的胃液pH值明显高于对照组(5.12±0.87v s 2.92±0.93),观察组患者的血浆ACTH、Cor浓度明显低于对照组(17.32±1.41 vs 25.31±2.61、423.9±203.6 vs 531.8±210.7),差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);观察组患者的应激性溃疡发生率、出血持续时间、死亡率明显低于对照组(14.29%vs 31.67%、2.56±1.89 vs 5.38±2.07、11.43%vs21.67%),差异具有统计学意义(P0.05).结论在丘脑出血患者中应用谷氨酰胺联合泮托拉唑的治疗方案,能够预防应激性溃疡的发生,改善患者预后.     

泮托拉唑预防脑出血并发应激性溃疡的疗效观察

目的 观察泮托拉唑预防脑出血并发应激性溃疡的疗效.方法 将100例脑出血患者随机分为观察组和对照组,在常规治疗的同时,观察组静脉注射泮托拉唑40mg,1次/d,对照组静脉注射西咪替丁400mg,1次/6h,疗程均为14d.比较两组防止脑出血并发应激性溃疡情况.结果 观察组出现应激性溃疡3例,发生率为6.00%,对照组出现应激性溃疡12例,发生率为24.00%,观察组发生应激性溃疡率明显低于对照组.结论 泮托拉唑预防脑出血并发应激性溃疡疗效满意,值得临床推广应用.     

热休克蛋白70对应激性胃溃疡黏膜的保护作用

目的:探讨热休克蛋白70(HSP70)表达是否随应激性胃渍疡病程的进展而变化.方法:收集30例应激性胃溃疡出血患者及10例术前患者的胃液及外周血,采用TRIzol一步法提取胃液脱落细胞及外周血白细胞总RNA,采用半定量RT-PCR检测HSP70的表达;同时,采用免疫组化技术检测外周血白细胞HSP70的表达.结果:RT-PCR检测结果提示应激性溃疡各期的HSP70表达明显高于对照组的表达(血标本:1期0.6289±0.1839,2期1.1322±0.3683,3期0.6855±0.1923,对照组0.3868±0.2071;胃液标本:1期0.7741±0.2442,2期1.2385±0.4558,3期0.8790±0.2722,对照组0.4626±0.2416:均P＜0.05),应激性溃疡2期HSP70表达显著高于1期和3期(P＜0.05),而1期和3期之间无统计学差异(P＞0.05).免疫组化结果为应激性溃疡患者外周血白细胞HSP70的表达水平在不同病期有所不同(1期40%,2期80%,3期30%,对照组10%,χ2=10.8383,P＜0.05),以2期表达水平最高,对照组表达最低.结论:应激性溃疡时患者外周血细胞和胃液脱落细胞均可检测到HSP70的表达,应激状态可诱导HSP70的表达,HSP70对胃黏膜具有保护作用,并可能促进应激性溃疡的愈合.     

泮托拉唑治疗重症脑出血并发应激性消化道溃疡的疗效研究

目的探讨泮托拉唑治疗重症脑出血并发应激性消化道溃疡的临床疗效。方法将我院收治的60例重症脑出血并发应激性消化道溃疡的患者随机分为观察组和对照组,各30例。观察组给予泮托拉唑治疗,对照组给予雷尼替丁治疗,比较两组患者的治疗效果及不良反应。结果观察组患者的总有效率为100.00%,对照组患者的总有效率为73.33%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组不良反应8例,对照组不良反应12例,两组不良反应率比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论泮托拉唑治疗重症脑出血并发应激性消化道溃疡的临床疗效显著,不良反应少,值得临床推广应用。     

泮托拉唑应用于预防创伤后应激性溃疡的临床价值

目的:分析泮托拉唑应用于预防创伤后应激性溃疡的临床价值.方法:选取2012-01/2014-01南阳市中心医院接收治疗的外科重症及大手术患者108例,采用随机数表法将108例患者分为观察组和对照组,每组54例.给予观察组患者泮托拉唑,给予对照组患者西咪替丁.对比治疗2w k后两组患者的发生率和手术前后的胃液p H值.结果:观察组患者中有2例患者发生应激性溃疡,发生率为3.71%.对照组患者中有11例患者发生应激性溃疡,发生率为20.38%.比较两组间差异具有统计学意义(P0.05).术前观察组患者和对照组患者的胃液p H值分别为2.00±0.22和2.00±0.23,术后观察组患者和对照组患者的胃液p H值分别为2.00±0.23和7.20±1.10.手术前后观察组患者的胃液p H值均高于对照组患者,比较两组间差异具有统计学意义(P0.05).结论:泮托拉唑较西咪替丁预防创伤后应激性溃疡的临床疗效较好,能够显著降低应激性溃疡的发生率.     

康复新液联合泮托拉唑治疗胃黏膜切除术后相关溃疡120例

[目的]观察康复新液联合泮托拉唑治疗胃黏膜切除术(EMR)后相关溃疡的临床疗效.[方法]将240例行胃EMR患者随机分为2组,治疗组给予泮托拉唑和康复新液治疗,对照组单用泮托拉唑治疗,术后1、4周复查胃镜,观察溃疡愈合情况.[结果]治疗组术后1周溃疡愈合率明显高于对照组(P＜0.05).[结论]康复新液能促进胃EMR后相关溃疡的早期愈合.     

国产泮托拉唑预防和治疗重症脑出血并发应激性溃疡疗效观察

目的观察国产泮托拉唑对重症脑出血并发应激性溃疡的疗效。方法利用空白对照和洛赛克对照研究中，观察患者用药前后疼痛、反酸、烧心、腹胀、腹泻、便秘、呕血及大便隐血等情况。结果国产泮托拉唑组与对照组相比症状改善明显，差异有非常显著性（P〈0．01），国产泮托拉唑组与洛赛克组相比差异无显著性（P〉0.05）。结论国产泮托拉唑与洛赛克均对重症脑出血并发应激性溃疡有明显疗效且国产泮托拉唑价格低廉易为患者接受。     

泮托拉唑与雷尼替丁治疗重症脑出血并发应激性溃疡出血的临床观察

目的 探讨泮托拉唑与雷尼替丁治疗重症脑出血并发应激性溃疡出血的临床效果。方法 130例重症脑出血并发应激性溃疡出血患者随机分为两组：治疗组和对照组，治疗组70例，采用泮托拉唑治疗；对照组60例，采用雷尼替丁治疗。结果 治疗组与对照组总有效率分别是94．3％和70％。两组比较差异有显著统计学意义（P〈0．01）。结论 泮托拉唑较雷尼替丁能更有效地治疗重症脑出血并发应激性溃疡出血。     

泮托拉唑联合铝碳酸镁治疗消化性溃疡的疗效观察

目的探讨溃疡愈合质量对消化性溃疡复发的影响。方法将124例十二指肠球部溃疡合并幽门螺杆菌（Hp）感染患者随机分为观察组68例、对照组56例,两组均先给予标准三联疗法根除Hp。1周后观察组给予泮托拉唑40 mg、1次/d,铝碳酸镁1000 mg、3次/d;对照组给予泮托拉唑40 mg、1次/d;继续治疗4周。停药4周后观察内镜下溃疡愈合率、胃黏膜组织学改变;随访1 a内溃疡复发情况。结果内镜下溃疡愈合率观察组94.1%、对照组87.5%,两组比较无统计学差异（P＆gt;0.05）。组织学观察显示黏膜层厚度、腺体密度和腺管形态恢复观察组显著优于对照组（P〈0.05）;1 a内溃疡复发率观察组2.9%、对照组17.8%,两者比较有统计学差异（P〈0.05）。结论泮托拉唑联用铝碳酸镁能提高溃疡愈合质量,减少溃疡复发。     

胶体果胶铋联合泮托拉唑三联治疗H.pylori阳性胃溃疡的疗效分析

目的观察胶体果胶铋联合泮托拉唑三联对H.pylori阳性胃溃疡的溃疡愈合质量的影响以及根除H.pylori的疗效。方法将经胃镜检查及14C呼气试验确诊的90例H.pylori阳性胃溃疡患者随机分为两组:对照组45例,口服泮托拉唑40 mg bid+左氧氟沙星200 mg bid+阿莫西林1 000 mg bid,连续口服10 d后,停服阿莫西林及左氧氟沙星,继续口服泮托拉唑40 mg qd维持3周;试验组45例,在对照组的基础上加用胶体果胶铋干混悬剂150 mg qid。停药4周后复查14C呼气试验,观察H.pylori根除情况;疗程结束后,胃镜复查评估溃疡愈合情况。结果试验组和对照组H.pylori根除率分别为88.89%、71.11%,两组相比,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);溃疡愈合率分别为86.67%、68.89%,两组相比,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。试验组溃疡愈合S2期获得率57.78%,显著高于对照组的33.33%(P0.05)。结论胶体果胶铋联合泮托拉唑三联治疗H.pylori阳性胃溃疡是一种高效、简便、安全的临床方案,胶体果胶铋在抗H.pylori、提高溃疡愈合质量上起着重要作用。     

长疗程小剂量泮托拉唑和克拉霉素三联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌的疗效观察

目的探讨泮托拉唑联合阿莫西林和克拉霉素对幽门螺杆菌治疗的效果及适当的剂量。方法来自我市8家医院的600例患者,患有胃溃疡或十二指肠溃疡,且幽门螺杆菌阳性。随机分为两组：观察组：泮托拉唑20mg＋阿莫西林750mg＋克拉霉素125mg,对照组：泮托拉唑40mg＋阿莫西林750mg＋克拉霉素250mg。各组药物均每日口服两次,疗程2周。结果对照组对幽门螺杆菌的根除率为81.7%,观察组对幽门螺杆菌的根除率为93.7%。结论泮托拉唑、阿莫西林、克拉霉素的三联疗法对幽门螺杆菌有很高的根除率,而半剂量的泮托拉唑和克拉霉素对幽门螺杆菌的治疗效果更好,且副作用少。     

康复新液联合潘托拉唑治疗消化性溃疡疗效分析

目的研究康复新液与潘托拉唑联合治疗消化性溃疡（PU）的疗效。方法将经胃镜检查确诊的128例PU患者随机分为两组,治疗组65例,口服康复新液10ml每日3次,潘托拉唑40mg每日1次口服;对照组63例,口服潘托拉唑40mg每日1次。治疗期间每周1次随防,记录症状转归情况。疗程结束后,胃镜复查评估溃疡愈合情况。结果各项临床症状的改善和疼痛消失情况两组相比差异无显著性（P〉0.05）。PU的愈合率和总有效率治疗组为95.4%和98.5%。对照组为82.5%和87.3%,两组相比差异有显著性（P〈0.05）。两组在用药期间,不良反应少,均有良好的耐受性。结论康复新液联合潘托拉唑治疗PU可提高溃疡的愈合率和总有效率,缩短溃疡的愈合时间。     

泮托拉唑治疗老年人反流性食管炎的长期疗效观察

目的探讨泮托拉唑治疗老年人反流性食管炎及预防复发的临床疗效。方法 70例反流性食管炎老年患者随机分为两组,每组35例,A组服用泮托拉唑40 mg,2次/d,B组服用泮托拉唑40 mg,1次/d。8周后,治疗有效的患者共61例,其中26例继续口服泮托拉唑40 mg,1次/d,维持治疗48周,另外35例未继续服用泮托拉唑但同时给予随访,并在8周、24周及48周时分别评价临床症状并复查胃镜。结果治疗8周后A组、B组的症状缓解有效率分别为91.4%、82.9%,内镜下食管炎改善有效率分别为97.1%、91.4%。维持治疗患者,24周后临床症状和内镜下食管炎缓解的有效率均为84.6%;48周后临床症状缓解的有效率为88.5%,内镜下食管炎改善有效率为84.6%。未维持治疗组24周及48周时临床症状缓解的有效率分别为48.6%、37.1%。结论泮托拉唑能有效地治疗老年人反流性食管炎及减少复发,维持48周的用药安全、有效。     

潘托拉唑治疗消化性溃疡临床疗效观察

目的：研究潘托拉唑治疗消化性溃疡的疗效及安全性。方法：将经胃镜证实的消化性溃疡患者随机分成潘托拉唑组（治疗组,简称潘组）和奥美拉唑组（对照组,简称奥组）,其中潘组60例,应用潘托拉唑40mg,1次／d;奥组58例;应用败类美拉唑20mg,1次／d。十二指肠溃疡患者疗程4周,胃溃疡6周。停药后均复查胃镜观察溃疡愈合情况。治疗期间每周随访1次。并记录症状改善情况及不良反应。结果：十二指肠溃疡的愈合率两组分别为91．7％和94．7％,胃溃疡的愈合率两组分别为91．7％反应。结果十二指肠溃疡的愈合率两组分别为91．7％和94．7％,胃溃疡的愈合率两组分别为91．7％和90．0％,P值均＞0．05。各项症状的改善情况两组相仿（P＞0．05）。治疗期间,两组均有良好的耐受性。结论潘托拉唑对消化性溃疡有较高的治愈率和症状改善率。疗效与奥美拉唑相当,其不良反应很少,患者耐受性好,是一种有应用前景的质子泵抑制剂。     

国产泮托拉唑治疗非甾体消炎药相关性溃疡出血的疗效分析

目的 比较泮托拉唑(商品名:泮立苏)与奥美拉唑(商品名:洛赛克)治疗非甾体消炎药相关消化性溃疡伴出血的疗效、不良反应及成本-效果比.方法 选择符合非甾体消炎药相关性溃疡伴出血诊断标准的住院患者58例,按随机数字表分为泮托拉唑组(31例)和奥美拉唑组(27例).泮托拉唑组予以国产泮托拉唑40 mg加入0.9%氯化钠溶液100 ml中静脉滴注,每12小时1次;奥美拉唑组予以进口奥美拉唑40 mg加入0.9%氯化钠溶液100 ml中静脉滴注,每12小时1次,两组疗程均为7 d.观察两组疗效及不良反应,并运用药物经济学方法分析二者成本-效果比.结果 泮托拉唑组总有效率为93.5%,奥美拉唑组总有效率为96.3%,两组药物均能有效止血,差异无统计学意义(P=1.00);两组不良反应发生率分别为3.2%和7.4%;成本-效果比(C/E)分别为7.76、20.73;奥美拉唑相对于泮托拉唑的增量成本-效果比(△C/△E)为454.结论 国产泮托拉唑是治疗非甾体消炎药相关性溃疡出血有效、安全、经济的药物.

Abstract：

Objective To compare the efficacy, adverse reactions and cost-effectiveness between domestic pantoprazole (Pan Li Su) and imported omeprazole (Losec) in the treatment of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) associated ulcer bleeding.Methods Fifty-eight hospitalized patients with NSAID associated ulcer bleeding were randomly divided into pantoprazole group (n=31)and omeprazole group (n= 27) according to random number table.Pantoprazole group was given 40 mg domestic pantoprazole dissolved 100 ml 0.9% sodium chloride solution intravenously every 12 hours.Omeprazde group was given 40 mg omeprazole dissolved in 100 ml 0.9% sodium chloride solution intravenously every 12 hours.The two groups were both treated for seven days.Finally, the efficacy and adverse effect were observed, and cost-effectiveness was analyzed with pharmacoeconomics.Results The total effective rate of pantoprazole group was 93.5%, omeprazole group was 96.3% .The drugs of the two groups could effectively stop bleeding, the difference was not statistically significant (P= 1.00).The rate of adverse effect was 3.2 % and 7.4 % in the two groups accordingly.The cost-effectiveness ratio (C/E) was 7.76 and 20.73 respectively.Compared with pantoprazole group, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of omeprazole group was 454.Conclusions Domesic pantoprazole is an effective, safety and economical medicine for NSAID associated ulcer bleeding.     

使用替罗非班时泮托拉唑对非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者消化道保护作用的评

目的:盐酸替罗非班、阿司匹林、氯吡格雷、低分子肝素（四联）联合使用治疗急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者时,评价静脉注射泮托拉唑对消化道保护的疗效和安全性。方法: 选择住院ACS患者296例,随机分为试药组184例,对照组112例,所有患者均服用阿司匹林、氯吡格雷、低分子肝素和使用2～3 d盐酸替罗非班。在此基础上试药组患者静脉输注泮托拉唑40 mg/d,4~5 d,再服用泮托拉唑片剂40 mg/次,2次/d,连服8 d。结果: 试药组8 d内全因死亡、顽固性心绞痛、再次心肌梗死、急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)数较对照组显著减少（P<0.05）;试药组与对照组比较消化道出血发生率（2.2% vs. 12.5%）、TIMI小出血发生率(1.6% vs. 6.2%)和TIMI较小出血发生率(0.5% vs. 5.4%)明显降低（P<0.05）。结论: 在四联抗栓治疗ACS患者时,静脉注射和口服泮托拉唑可以减少8 d内消化道出血发生率,从而减少了8 d内患者死亡、顽固性心绞痛、再次心肌梗死、急诊PCI数,具有良好的消化道保护作用和安全性。     

Dose-range finding study with the proton pump inhibitor pantoprazole in acute duodenal ulcer patients.

Pantoprazole is a newly developed benzimidazole derivative with strong inhibitory actions on gastric acid secretion by blocking H(+)-K(+)-ATPase. This randomized double-blind multicenter trial investigated the efficacy of 20 mg, 40 mg and 80 mg pantoprazole o.m. on ulcer healing and symptomatic relief in 219 out-patients with endoscopically assessed acute duodenal ulcer. After 2 weeks complete ulcer healing was achieved in 58%, 89% and 82% of the patients with 20 mg, 40 mg and 80 mg pantoprazole o.m., respectively. After 4 weeks, corresponding figures were 93%, 99% and 100%; the difference of the healing rates between the 20 mg and 40 mg groups at 2 weeks was statistically significant (p < 0.0001). A rapid pain relief was achieved in all treatment groups: 72% of the 20 mg group, 89% of the 40 mg group, and 84% of the 80 mg group were pain-free after 2 weeks. The difference between 20 mg and 40 mg was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Pantoprazole was well tolerated. Adverse events occurred in 13 patients; headache, skin alterations, and diarrhea were reported most frequently. Severity and frequency of adverse events did not reveal any dose-dependence. In conclusion, pantoprazole provides fast healing of acute duodenal ulcer as well as rapid improvement of ulcer symptoms. For further clinical trials in peptic ulcer disease a daily dose of pantoprazole 40 mg o.m. is recommended.     

The efficacy of the third pump inhibitor--pantoprazole--in the short-term treatment of Chinese patients with duodenal ulcer.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To study the efficacy and tolerability of pantoprazole 40 mg once daily before breakfast compared with ranitidine 300 mg once daily at bedtime in Chinese patients with duodenal ulcer, and to evaluate the relationship between Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) clearance and ulcer healing rate. METHODOLOGY: A total of 160 patients (80 in each group) with endoscopically diagnosed, active duodenal ulcers were studied in this randomized double-blind trial. Endoscopy was performed after 2 weeks of treatment. If unhealed, then the patients were re-endoscoped after an additional 2 weeks of similar treatment. RESULTS: The healing rates after 2 and 4 weeks were 61.3% and 97.3%, respectively in the pantoprazole group, and 50.7% and 76.9% in the ranitidine group. The difference between the two groups was significant at 4 weeks (p < 0.01, per protocol analysis). The rate of pain free ulcer was higher in the pantoprazole group than in the ranitidine group at 2 weeks (84.2% vs. 59.6%, p < 0.01). Higher clearance of H. pylori was also observed in the pantoprazole group compared with the ranitidine group at 4 weeks (20% vs. 0%, p = 0.05). The healing rate tended to be higher in patients who were H. pylori-cleared at 2 weeks (p = 0.07) in the pantoprazole group. Both medications were well tolerated without any serious adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Pantoprazole 40 mg daily is superior to ranitidine 300 mg daily in the short-term treatment of acute duodenal ulcer in Chinese patients, in terms of ulcer healing and pain relief, and appears to be well-tolerated.     

评估以泮托拉唑为基础的三联和四联疗法根除幽门螺杆菌的疗效

目的 比较以泮托拉唑为基础的7d标准三联疗法与泮托拉唑+铋剂+甲硝唑+四环素的10 d四联疗法根除Hp的疗效和安全性.方法 170例非溃疡性消化不良的Hp感染者随机入选三联、四联治疗组.三联治疗组实行PAC方案:泮托拉唑40 mg(2次/d)+阿莫西林1.0 g(2次/d)+克拉霉素500 mg(2次/d),口服7 d.四联治疗组实行PBMT方案:泮托拉唑40 mg(2次/d)+胶体次枸橼酸铋220 mg(2次/d)+四环素750 mg(2次/d)+甲硝唑400 mg(2次/d),口服10 d.治疗结束后至少停药4周后复查13C-尿素呼气试验,结果≤4%.为Hp阴性,表示根除成功.同时评估疗效及安全性.结果 166例患者按方案完成治疗.三联治疗组按意图治疗分析(ITT)根除率为63.53%(54/85),较四联治疗组低[89.41%(76/85),x2=17.168,P=0.000].三联治疗组按实验方案分析(PP)根除率为65.06%(54/83),亦较四联治疗组低[91.57%(76/83),x2=13.588,P=0.000].从年龄段分析,年龄＞30岁者三联治疗组根除失败率为22.22%(4/18),较四联治疗组高[3.84%(1/26),x2=19.884,P=0.000].三联和四联治疗组不良反应发生率分别为60.00%(51/85)和42.35%(36/85).结论 在7 d标准三联疗法Hp根除疗效降低的情况下,含泮托拉唑、铋剂、四环素和甲硝唑的10 d四联方案可考虑为首选方案.

Abstract：

Objective Compare the efficacy and safety of pantoprazole-based 7-day standard triple therapy with 10-day quadruple therapy including pantoprazole, bismuth, metronidazole and tetracycline in Helicobacter pylori (H.pylori) eradication.Methods A total of 170 H.pylori positive patients with non-ulcer dyspepsia were recruited and randomly assigned into triple and quadruple therapy groups.The triple therapy group was implemented with PAC program which included orally taking pantoprazole 40 mg twice per day, amoxicillin 1.0 g twice per day and clarithromycin 500 mg twice per day for seven days.The quadruple therapy group was implemented with PBMT program which consisted of orally taking pantoprazole 40 mg twice per day, colloidal bismuth subcitrate 220 mg twice per day, metronidazole 400 mg three times per day and tetracycline 750 mg twice per day for ten days.The 13C -urea breathe test was re-examined at least 4 weeks after the completion of treatment, the result lower than 4%.was H.pylori negative which indicated the success of H.pylori eradication.The efficacy and safety were also evaluated.Results A total of 166 patients completed the treatment.With intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, the H.pylori eradication rate in the triple therapy group was 63.5% (54/85), lower than that of the quadruple therapy group (89.41%(76/85) ,x2= 17.168,P=0.000).With per protocol (PP) analysis, the eradication rate in the triple therapy group was 65.06% (54/83), also lower than that of the quadruple therapy group (91.57 % (76/83) ,x2 = 13.588 ,P=0.000).Through the age analysis, in patients over 30 years old,the eradication failed rate in the triple therapy group was 22.22% (4/18), higher than that of the quadruple therapy group (3.84% (1 / 26), x2 = 19.884, P=0.000).The incidence of adverse reaction rates of the triple and quadruple therapy group were 60.00% (51/85) and 42.35 % (36/85) respectively.Conclusion Since the reduction of eradication rate with seven day standard triple therapy,the 10-day pantoprazole, bismuth, metronidazole and tetracycline quadruple therapy may be considered as the first choice.