Blood-borne viruses in the haemodialysis-dependent population attending Top End Northern Territory facilities 2000-2009

Aim: To describe the incidence and prevalence of blood‐borne viruses (BBV) including: hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and human T‐cell leukaemia virus type‐1 (HTLV) in the haemodialysis‐dependent population of the Top End of the Northern Territory (TENT). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the serology of BBV in a longitudinal fashion in the haemodialysis‐dependent population treated in the TENT of Australia from 2000 to 2009 inclusive. HBV, HCV, HIV and HTLV serology on commencement of dialysis and at exit or January 2010, whichever was earlier, as well as demographic details were collected. Patients with a change in serological status had all serology reviewed. Results: Four‐hundred and forty patients were included in the analysis. Of these, 84.3% were Indigenous and 55.4% female, with a median age of 50 (IQR 43–59) years at the commencement of haemodialysis. Evidence of past HBV infection was documented in 42.7% and 8.9% were hepatitis B surface antigen‐positive. Positive serology for HTLV was documented in 2.2%, 1.6% were hepatitis C antibody‐positive and no individual was HIV‐positive. Three patients had a definite change in their HBV serology over time; this equates to an absolute seroconversion risk of 0.1 per 100 person years or 0.0006 per dialysis episode. Conclusions: In this cohort, there was a high rate of past and current hepatitis B infection but low rates of seroconversion while on haemodialysis.     

Prevalence of Occult Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C Virus Infections in Turkish Hemodialysis Patients

Background and Objective. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections are important causes of morbidity and mortality in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Although their exact prevalence is not known, HBV and HCV viral infections and occult viral hepatitis are frequent in these patients. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of occult HBV and HCV infections in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Materials and Methods. One hundred and eighty-eight end-stage renal disease patients on maintenance hemodialysis (100 male, mean age 49±29 [16–80] years, and mean duration of hemodialysis 98±66 [12–228] months) were enrolled in this study. Serological markers for HBV and HCV were determined with immunoenzymatic assay (ELISA) by using commercial diagnostic kits (Access and BioRad, Beckman-Coulter). HCV-RNA (Cobas Amplicor HCV kit) and HBV-DNA (Artus GmbH HBV kit) were determined quantitatively by polymerase chain reaction. Results. Among the patients screened, 25 (13.3%) had HBV infection alone and 38 (20.2%) had HCV infection alone, while seven (3.7%) had dual infection of both viruses. Serological markers for occult hepatitis B and occult hepatitis C were positive in five (2.7%) and nine (4.8%) of the patients, respectively. Isolated anti-HBc was positive in 12 (6.4%) of all patients, three (7.9%) of the patients with anti-HCV and two (40%) of the patients with occult hepatitis B. Isolated anti-HBc positivity was more frequent in patients with occult hepatitis B than in those without (40% [2/5] vs. 5.5% [10/183], p=0.002). None of the patients with HCV had occult hepatitis B. Conclusions. Both occult and non-occult forms of HCV infection are more prevalent than HBV infection in hemodialysis patients. Especially the patients with isolated anti-HBc positivity should be tested for probable occult hepatitis B infection.     

Prevalence of hepatitis C, hepatitis B and HIV infection among haemodialysis patients in Ibn-Rochd university hospital, Casablanca

The viral infections are frequent in haemodialysis patients, notably those due to the hepatitis C virus (HCV), the hepatitis B virus (HBV) and the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The objective of this study is to determine the prevalence of the hepatitis C, the hepatitis B, the HIV infection in haemodialysis patients and the main risk factors for hepatitis C in the chronic haemodialysis patients treated in haemodialysis unit of Ibn Rochd University Hospital in Casablanca. This retrospective study was performed in 186 chronic haemodialysis patients and showed a high prevalence of HVC infection (76%), the prevalence of HBV infection was at 2%, none of the patients had detectable antibodies of HIV. Among the patients infected by the HCV, the mean duration of dialysis was 8,7 years. The mean number of blood units transfused was 16,5. Seventeen patients (11%) had no history of blood transfusion. In conclusion, the blood transfusion is not considered to be a like a major risk factor of the HCV infection in haemodialysis patients and this since the systematic detection of the anti-HCV antibodies in the blood donors. The nosocomial transmission of HCV seems to be the main risk factor HCV infection in the haemodialysis units requiring a strict adherence to infection control procedures for prevention of HVC infection in haemodialysis patients.     

Seroprevalence of hepatitis C virus and hepatitis B virus among dialysis patients in Bahrain and Saudi Arabia

Dialysis patients are at risk for contracting blood-borne infections, including hepatitis viruses (HBV and HCV). The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of HBV and HCV infection among hamodialysis patients in Bahrain and Saudi Arabia. Study subjects comprised 81 Bahraini and 34 Saudi dialysis patients, and as control 7714 Bahraini and 2330 Saudi blood donors. Serologic markers of HBV (HBsAg, anti-HBc) and HCV (anti-HCV) were determined by EIA and confirmed by PCR (HBV) and RT-PCR (HCV). Higher prevalence of HCV (9.240% vs 0.300%, P <.001), HBsAg (5.88% vs 0.620%; P <.001), but not anti-HBc (1.7% vs 4.6%; P =.01) were seen in patients compared to controls, respectively. When compared to Bahrainis, higher prevalence of HBsAg (11.8% vs 3.7%) and anti-HCV (14.7% vs 7.4%) were seen among Saudi patients, respectively. Double HCV infection was frequent, and the most prevalent types were HCV1a/1b plus HCV4 in Bahraini, and HCV 2/2a plus HCV 4 among Saudi dialysis patients. Our results are the first report on viral hepatitis among dialysis patients in Bahrain, and the first to compare HBV/HCV rates among dialysis patients in the Eastern Arabian peninsula, and confirms other results that documented increased HBV and HCV infection among dialysis patients. Future studies aimed at assessing the status and to monitor the progress of viral hepatitis infection among dialyzed and transfused patients will have a strong impact on patient diagnosis, follow-up, and treatment.     

Prevalence of occult hepatitis B and hepatitis C virus infections in Turkish hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections are important causes of morbidity and mortality in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Although their exact prevalence is not known, HBV and HCV viral infections and occult viral hepatitis are frequent in these patients. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of occult HBV and HCV infections in maintenance hemodialysis patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and eighty-eight end-stage renal disease patients on maintenance hemodialysis (100 male, mean age 49+/-29 [16-80] years, and mean duration of hemodialysis 98+/-66 [12-228] months) were enrolled in this study. Serological markers for HBV and HCV were determined with immunoenzymatic assay (ELISA) by using commercial diagnostic kits (Access and BioRad, Beckman-Coulter). HCV-RNA (Cobas Amplicor HCV kit) and HBV-DNA (Artus GmbH HBV kit) were determined quantitatively by polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Among the patients screened, 25 (13.3%) had HBV infection alone and 38 (20.2%) had HCV infection alone, while seven (3.7%) had dual infection of both viruses. Serological markers for occult hepatitis B and occult hepatitis C were positive in five (2.7%) and nine (4.8%) of the patients, respectively. Isolated anti-HBc was positive in 12 (6.4%) of all patients, three (7.9%) of the patients with anti-HCV and two (40%) of the patients with occult hepatitis B. Isolated anti-HBc positivity was more frequent in patients with occult hepatitis B than in those without (40% [2/5] vs. 5.5% [10/183], p=0.002). None of the patients with HCV had occult hepatitis B. CONCLUSIONS: Both occult and non-occult forms of HCV infection are more prevalent than HBV infection in hemodialysis patients. Especially the patients with isolated anti-HBc positivity should be tested for probable occult hepatitis B infection.     

HBV and HCV infections in heart transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Heart transplant (HTx) recipients risk acquiring hepatotropic viral infections such as hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV), and the impact of these infections on post-HTx survival remains unclear. The aim of the present study was to define the prevalence, clinical features, and natural history of HBV and HCV infections in a cohort of HTx recipients. METHODS: We retrospectively studied 360 consecutive patients who had undergone HTx. Clinical picture, hepatic injury indexes, and HBV/HCV viral serology were followed post-transplant. RESULTS: During follow-up (average, 8 +/- 3.1 years), 49 (16.5%) of the HTx recipients tested positive for at least 1 of the 2 viruses (3.1% HBV, 12% HCV, 0.5% concomitant infection). The prevalence of HCV infection in heart transplant recipients transplanted before and after 1990 was 28% and 4.2%, respectively, the latter being markedly lower (p < 0.001) than in earlier series of HTx recipients and much lower than expected in the age- and sex-matched general population. All HBV-positive and 58% of HCV-positive recipients developed chronic liver disease. Sixteen percent of patients developed cirrhosis during follow-up, and 8% died of end-stage liver disease. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of HBV and HCV in a large population of HTx recipients is not very different from that reported in the general population. Active viral replication of HBV and an aggressive natural history of both infections are seen in HTx recipients, however. The low prevalence of HBV- and HCV-related infection in recent series probably reflects current viral screening and vaccination policies.     

Relationship of hepatitis B or C virus prevalences, risk factors, and outcomes in renal transplant recipients: analysis of German data

BACKGROUND: Chronic liver disease resulting from hepatitis B (HBV) and hepatitis C (HCV) virus infections is still a major concern in kidney recipients. Our aim was to evaluate the prevalences, risk factors, and impact of HBV and HCV infections in adult renal transplant recipients in Germany. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected on 1633 kidney recipients transplanted between 1989 and 2002 at the 21 German renal transplant centers participating in MOST, the prospective Multinational Observational Study in Transplantation. Subgroup analyses compared HBV- and HCV-positive patients vs those with HBV/HCV-negative serology at the time of transplantation. RESULTS: The prevalences of 4.4% (n = 72) for HBV and 5.8% (n = 94) for HCV showed a marked decline over the last 15 years. Retransplantations were significantly more common among HBV+ (29%) and HCV+ (36%) than HBV-/HCV- patients (12%). HCV+ patients experienced significantly longer dialysis times and received significantly more pretransplantation blood transfusions. Between all groups, no significant differences were observed in acute rejection rate at 12 months or in renal graft function up to 5 years posttransplantation (mean glomerular filtration rate: HBV+, 57.3 mL/min; HCV+, 58.5 mL/min; HBV-/HCV-, 59 mL/min). No progressive elevations in liver enzymes and bilirubin were noted during the 5-year observation period. CONCLUSIONS: HBV and HCV infections currently have a low prevalence among German kidney graft recipients. Long dialysis times, blood transfusions, and retransplantations were identified as risk factors for hepatitis infections. At 5 years posttransplantation, kidney and liver functions did not differ significantly between HBV+ and HCV+ vs HBV-/HCV- renal transplant recipients.     

Incidence of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV), Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) and Dual Infection in Egyptian Patients on Haemodialysis

Hepatitis viral infections are important causes of morbidity and mortality in haemodialysis patients. The aim of the present work is to study the prevalence and possible risk factors of hepatitis C virus (HCV), hepatitis B virus (HBV) and dual infection in haemodialysis patients. Three hundred forty patients with end-stage renal disease, 266 males (78.2%) with mean age of 50.9?±?11.6 years and 74 females (21.8%) with mean age of 53.5?±?10.5 years on haemodialysis, were recruited from four haemodialysis units. They were screened for the presence of HCV, HBV and dual HCV and HBV infections and possible risk factors for acquiring these infections in those patients during the period between June 2007 and August 2009. One hundred ninety-six (57.7%) patients were HCV positive while 12 (3.5%) patients had HBV infection. A dual infection with both viruses was observed in 26 patients (7.6%).There was a significant difference in the number of blood transfusions among HCV-positive, HBV-positive and dual infection patients and negative patients (12.4?±?7.6, 13.8?±?6.8, 13.5?±?8.3 vs. 5.2?±?3.4 transfusions, p?<?0.01). HCV, HBV and dual HCV and HBV patients have been on dialysis for a longer period than the negative patients (7.5?±?5, 6.2?±?3.6, 7.5?±?5.4 vs. 4.4?±?4 years, p?<?0.01). Higher HCV was associated with longer haemodialysis duration and history of previous blood transfusion and not associated with dialysis in multicentres. HBV and dual infection is less prevalent than HCV in haemodialysis units.     

Impact of hepatitis B and C on graft loss and mortality of patients after kidney transplantation

BACKGROUND: Mortality or graft loss after renal transplantation might be influenced by hepatitis virus infection. METHODS: Sera from time of transplantation of 927 renal transplant recipients were tested for hepatitis C (HCV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV) in order to investigate the impact of hepatitis virus infection on graft loss and mortality over an observation period of 20 yr. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty three of 927 patients were HCV positive, 30 patients HBV positive and seven patients HBV and HCV positive. The observation period was 9.2 +/- 4.4 yr. Mortality was significantly higher in patients with hepatitis B (p = 0.0005), as well as in patients with concomitant B and C hepatitis (p < 0.0001) and in those who acquired HCV infection after transplantation (n = 30, p = 0.0192) compared with non-infected patients. Patients with replicating HBV infection (HBeAg positive) had the worst prognosis (p < 0.0001). In the multivariate analysis the presence of HBeAg (p < 0.0001), patients' age (p < 0.0001) and HCV infection after transplantation (p = 0.0453) were predictors for death. Graft survival was significantly shorter in patients with concomitant hepatitis B and C (p = 0.0087) as well as in HBeAg positive patients (p = 0.002). HCV infection or HBs antigenemia did not have a significant impact on graft survival compared with non-infected patients. CONCLUSION: HCV infection after transplantation is associated with a high mortality whereas chronic HCV infection before trans plantation does not have a significant impact on mortality. Patients with replicating HBV infection or concomitant HBV and HCV infection have a high risk of graft loss and mortality.     

胆管癌与肝炎病毒感染相关性研究

目的:调查胆管癌患者血清中肝炎病毒标志物检出率,探讨胆管癌发生与肝炎病毒感染的相关性.方法:收集天津地区11年间3所医院305例胆管癌的临床资料,统计其中肝炎病毒感染率和肝炎病毒危险因素接触状况,调查住院期间血清肝炎病毒标志物检出情况.调查了同期住院的480例良性胆道疾病患者作为对照.结果:胆管癌和良性胆道疾病患者既往乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)感染率分别为3%和2.5%;29%的胆管癌病例可以检出HBV的血清标志物,而良性胆道疾病病例HBV血清标志物的检出率为21%,二者有显著差异.丙型肝炎病毒(HBV)的血清标志物检出率在胆管癌为4.3%,在良性胆道疾病为5.6%,二者比较无差别.结论:胆管癌患者中并发HBV感染率较高,HBV感染与胆管癌的发生可能存在一定的关系.由于HCV的检测指标单一,目前尚不能排除胆管癌发生与HCV感染无关.     

Clinical impact of GB-C virus in haemodialysis patients

Background: Haemodialysis patients run a high risk of acquiring viral hepatitis B (HBV) or C (HCV) infection. Recently a new parenterally transmittable RNA virus, designated GBV-C, was isolated. Methods: We therefore screened 277 patients on maintenance dialysis and 358 blood donors as a control group for GBV-C by nested PCR and correlated the data with AST, ALT, duration of dialysis, transfusion, renal transplants and coinfections with HBV and HCV. Results: The prevalence of GBV-C among haemodialysis patients was 7.9%, and 3.6% among blood donors. Neither duration of dialysis nor number of blood transfusions were associated with GBV-C infection, whereas GBV-C positive patients were significantly more often transplanted than GBV-C-negative individuals. Transaminases of GBV-C-positive individuals remained within normal limits in all haemodialysis patients and normal in all infected blood donors. Coinfections of GBV-C with HBV and HCV were only present in 0.7% and 1% respectively. Conclusions: We conclude that GBV-C virus infection is frequent among haemodialysis patients. Transaminases cannot serve as surrogate markers, and parenteral as well as community-acquired infection seems to be possible. Key words: GBV-C; haemodialysis; viral hepatitis      

Longer survival of liver transplant recipients with hepatitis virus coinfections

Hepatitis virus coinfections [HBV plus HCV coinfection (HBV/HCV) or HBV plus HDV coinfection (HBV/HDV)] may progress more rapidly to cirrhosis than hepatitis B or C monoinfections in immunocompetent patients. Only limited information is available on the outcome of coinfected patients after liver transplantation. We studied survival rates of 204 patients with viral hepatitis transplanted at our center between 1972 and 1997. HBV/HDV and HBV/HCV coinfections were present in 23 and nine individuals, respectively, while 97 patients had monoinfection by HCV and 75 had HBV monoinfection. Survival of coinfected patients was significantly longer than that of monoinfected patients (14.4 +/- 0.9 vs. 8.5 +/- 0.6 yr; p = 0.0003). The same was true for graft survival (p = 0.0002). In Cox's regression, viral coinfection (p = 0.0001), absence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (p = 0.00001) and no retransplantation (p = 0.02) were independently associated with patient survival. After exclusion of patients with HCC (n = 62), survival of coinfected patients was still significantly longer than that of monoinfected individuals (p = 0.002). The improved outcome was similar for both HBV/HDV and HBV/HCV coinfections. In contrast to immunocompetent patients, individuals with multiple hepatitis virus infections had an improved outcome after liver transplantation. Thus, viral coinfections may be associated with ameliorated courses of diseases under certain conditions.     

Risk factors for cytomegalovirus, hepatitis B and C virus reactivation after bone marrow transplantation

To derive guidelines for a safer bone marrow transplantation (BMT) policy, we have to study pre-BMT risk factors that may be associated with an increased post-BMT death. Among those factors, the importance of pre-BMT viral hepatitis markers in BMT donors and recipients remains unsettled. In the present study, we have determined the effect of prior donor and recipient cytomegalovirus (CMV), hepatitis B virus (HBV), and hepatitis C virus (HCV) exposure on the incidence of those viral infections after bone marrow transplantation (BMT). The study included 63 patients presented to the BMT unit; 28 of them underwent transplantation and 35 were not transplanted. All serum markers of CMV, HBV, and HCV infections were monitored using ELISA technique, as well as PCR-DNA for CMV, HBV and HCV RT-PCR techniques for HCV. The incidence of active CMV and HCV was 11/28 (39%) and 6/28 (21%) in post-BMT recipients compared to 2/35 (6%) and 2/35 (6%) in the 35 untransplanted patients (P=0.00003 and P=0.05). Whereas active HBV infection was non significantly (P=0.13) higher 3/28 (11%) in the BMT patients in comparison to 1/35 (3%) in untransplanted patients. Ten out of the 19 (53%) of the CMV-seropositive recipients developed CMV reactivation compared to 1/9 (11%) of the CMV-seronegative recipients who developed CMV seroconversion. In addition, 3/8 (38%) of the HBV-seropositive recipients developed HBV reactivation in comparison to 0/20 of the HBV-seronegative recipients. Moreover, 5/13 (39%) of the HCV-seropositive recipients developed HCV reactivation in comparison to 1/16 (6%) of the HCV-seronegative recipients who developed HCV seroconversion. In conclusion, previous exposure to CMV, HBV, and HCV infections in the recipients of BMT patients were found to influence the risk of developing those viral infections.     

Environmental Transmission of Hepatitis B and Hepatitis C Viruses Within the Hemodialysis Unit

Abstract: The hepatitis B virus (HBV) can be transmitted in the dialysis setting through blood transfusions and environmental surfaces. Transfusion related hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is very well known, but only recently the environmental transmission of this virus was postulated. In order to study the prevalence, mechanisms of transmission, and the ALT patterns of HBV and HCV infections in hemodialysis and CAPD patients before the implementation of HBV vaccination and HCV screening in the blood bank, we conducted a study from January 1987 to January 1990. Sera from 185 hemodialysis and 124 CAPD patients were stored in this period and later analyzed for HBsAg, anti-HBc, anti-HBs, and anti-HCV (second generation ELISA). The prevalence of any HBV marker was 55.7% (103/185) for hemodialysis patients and 31.5% (39/124) for CAPD patients (hemodialysis vs. CAPD, p < 0.001). The prevalence of positive anti-HCV was 35.1% (65/185) for hemodialysis and 33.9% (42/124) for CAPD patients (not significant). There was a significant association between HBV markers positivity and anti-HCV positivity. The multivariate analysis of risk factors revealed an association of the positivity of each virus with the duration of renal replacement therapy (RRT), number of previous blood transfusions, and past history of hemodialysis treatment. Thus, besides the transfusion-related transmission, hemodialysis environmental transmission may also occur for both viruses. The findings of a high prevalence of both viruses and evidence for environmental transmission in the dialysis setting are of major importance for the planning of future preventive measures.     

Occult HBV Infection in Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis and Hemodialysis Patients

Aim. Occult hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection can be defined as the presence of HBV DNA in the liver and/or blood in the absence of detectable serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBs Ag). There is a high prevalence of occult HBV infection in dialysis patients. This study investigated the prevalence of occult HBV infection in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and hemodialysis (HD) patients and compared the prevalence of occult HBV infection in dialysis patients either with or without hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.?Methods.?In this cross-sectional study, 71 CAPD patients and 71 HD patients were evaluated. HBV DNA testing was performed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). We recorded general characteristics of the patients, duration of dialysis, HBs Ag, antibody to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs), antibody to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc), anti-HCV antibody (anti-HCV), HCV RNA, serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and aspartate aminotransferase levels (AST).?Results.?Twelve (16.9%) of the 71 HD patients and seven (9.8%) of the 71 CAPD patients were HBV DNA-positive. A statistically significant difference was not observed in the groups. Anti-HCV was negative and AST and ALT levels were normal in all of the HBV-DNA positive patients. Viral loads were low in both groups. Conclusion. This is the first study that analyzes occult HBV prevalence in CAPD patients. We conclude that the prevalence of the occult HBV may be common in CAPD patients as in HD patients, and HCV positivity is not a contributing factor to occult HBV infection in dialysis patients.     

Surveillance snapshot: service members with hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and HIV-1, active component, U.S. Armed Forces

Risk factors and routes of transmission of hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) are similar; therefore, individuals infected with one of these viruses may be coinfected or at high risk of acquiring another infection. Among active component service members diagnosed with HBV infections (n=2,204) between 2000 and 2010, 86 (3.9%) were also diagnosed with HCV and 49 (2.2%) with HIV-1. Among service members diagnosed with HCV infections (n=3,185) between 2000 and 2010, 86 (2.7%) were diagnosed with HBV and 45 (1.4%) with HIV-1. Four service members were diagnosed with HBV, HCV, and HIV-1 during the period (figure below). Individuals diagnosed with HIV-1, HBV, or HCV infections should be tested for coinfections and counseled to prevent acquisitions of similarly transmitted infections.     

Torque teno virus infection in hemodialysis patients in North India

This study describes the prevalence and association of Torque teno virus (TTV) infection with blood-transmitted viral hepatitis including hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections in patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) on maintenance hemodialysis (HD). TTV infection was diagnosed by detection of TTV-DNA in serum, using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique. TTV-DNA was estimated in a total number of one hundred patients with CRF and in 100 voluntary blood donors as controls. The markers of HBV and HCV were also tested in sera samples of these patients. TTV-DNA was detected in 39 of 100 patients (39%) with CRF and in 27 of 100 (27%) healthy controls. The analysis of the results demonstrated HBsAg, IgM anti-HBc, anti-HCV, and HCV core antigen in 5.0, 3.0, 6.0, and 4.0% of patients, respectively. This study could not show any association of TTV with HBV and HCV infections for the transmission pattern or any impact on severity of diseases caused by these viruses in CRF patients. TTV also could not show any association with demographic characteristics of patients, duration of dialysis, number of blood transfusions and renal/liver function of the patients. As such, this study concludes that TTV appears as a benign pathogen, showing no sign of renal/liver damage or any change in the severity of diseases caused by blood-borne hepatitis viruses.     

Current state of kidney transplantation in patients with HIV,hepatitis C,and hepatitis B infection

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis C (HCV), and hepatitis B (HBV) are common chronic viral infections in the end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patient population that were once considered relative contraindications to kidney transplantation. In this review, we will summarize the current state of kidney transplantation in patients with HIV, HCV, and HBV, which is rapidly evolving. HIV+ patients enjoy excellent outcomes in the modern transplant era and may have new transplant opportunities with the use of HIV+ donors. Direct-acting antivirals for HCV have substantially changed the landscape of care for patients with HCV infection. HBV+ patients now have excellent patient and allograft survival with HBV therapy. Currently, kidney transplantation is a safe and appropriate treatment for the majority of ESKD patients with HIV, HCV, and HBV.