The crystallization rate of poly(ethylene terephthalate) accelerated by co[poly(butylene terephthalate‐p‐oxybenzoate)] copolyesters

Poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) was blended with three different kinds of co[poly(butylene terephthalate‐p‐oxybenzoate)] copolyesters, designated B28, B46, and B64, with the level of copolyester varying from 1 to 15 wt %. All samples were prepared by solution blending in a 60/40 by weight phenol/tetrachloroethane solvent at 50°C. The crystallization behavior of samples was then studied via differential scanning calorimetry. The results indicate that these three copolyesters accelerate the crystallization rate of PET in a manner similar to that of a nucleating agent. The acceleration of PET crystallization rate was most pronounced in the PET/B28 blends with a maximum level at 10 wt % of B28. The melting temperatures for the blends are comparable with that of pure PET. The observed changes in crystallization behavior are explained by the effect of the physical state of the copolyester during PET crystallization as well as the amount of copolyester in the blends. © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 76: 587–593, 2000     

Blends of poly(ethylene terephthalate) with co[poly(ethylene terephthalate-p-oxybenzoate)]. II. Composition effect on the rate of crystallization

Poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) was blended with four different kinds of co[poly(ethylene terephthalate-p-oxybenzoate)] copolyesters, designated P28, P46, P64, and P82, with the level of copolyester varing from 1 to 15 wt %. All samples were prepared by melt-mixing in a Brabender Plasticorder for 8 min. The crystallization behavior of samples were then studied via DSC. The results indicate that these four copolyesters accelerate the crystallization rate of PET in a manner similar to that of a nucleating agent. The acceleration of the PET crystallization rate was most pronounced in the PET/P28 blends with a maximum level at 10 wt % of P28, and in the PET/P28 blends, at 5 wt % of P82. The melting endotherm onset temperatures and the melting peak widths for the blends are comparable with those of neat PET. These results imply that the stability of PET crystalline phase in the blends does not change by blending. The observed changes in crystallization behavior, however, are explained by the effect of the physical state of the copolyester during PET crystallization as well as the content of the p-oxybenzoate (POB) moiety in corporated into the blends. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Non-isothermal Crystallization of Poly(ethylene terephthalate) with Poly(oxybenzoate-p-trimethylene terephthalate) Copolymer

The influence of a poly(oxybenzoate-p-trimethylene terephthalate) copolymer, designated T64, on the non-isothermal crystallization process of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) was investigated. All samples were prepared by solution blending in a 60/40 by weight phenol/tetrachloroethane solvent at 50°C. The solidification process strongly depended on cooling rate and composition of system. The crystallization rate of blends was estimated by crystallization rate parameter (CRP) and crystallization rate coefficient (CRC). From these results of CRP and CRC, it was predicted that the overall non-isothermal crystallization rate of PET would be accelerated by blending with 1–15 wt% of T64. The acceleration of PET crystallization rate was most pronounced in the PET/T64 blends with 5 wt% T64. The observed changes in crystallization behavior are explained by the effect of the physical state of the copolyester during PET crystallization as well as the amount of copolymer in the blends. An Ozawa plot was used to analyze the data of non-isothermal crystallization. The obvious curvature in the plot indicated that the Ozawa model could not fit the PET/T64 blend system well, and there was an abrupt change in the slope of the Ozawa plot at a critical cooling rate.     

Microstructure and crystallization of melt‐mixed poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene isophthalate) blends

Physical blends of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and poly(ethylene isophthalate) (PEI), abbreviated PET/PEI (80/20) blends, and of PET and a random poly(ethylene terephthalate‐co‐isophthalate) copolymer containing 40% ethylene isophthalate (PET₆₀I₄₀), abbreviated PET/PET₆₀I₄₀ (50/50) blends, were melt‐mixed at 270°C for different reactive blending times to give a series of copolymers containing 20 mol % of ethylene isophthalic units with different degrees of randomness. ¹³C‐NMR spectroscopy precisely determined the microstructure of the blends. The thermal and mechanical properties of the blends were evaluated by DSC and tensile assays, and the obtained results were compared with those obtained for PET and a statistically random PETI copolymer with the same composition. The microstructure of the blends gradually changed from a physical blend into a block copolymer, and finally into a random copolymer with the advance of transreaction time. The melting temperature and enthalpy of the blends decreased with the progress of melt‐mixing. Isothermal crystallization studies carried out on molten samples revealed the same trend for the crystallization rate. The effect of reaction time on crystallizability was more pronounced in the case of the PET/PET₆₀I₄₀ (50/50) blends. The Young's modulus of the melt‐mixed blends was comparable to that of PET, whereas the maximum tensile stress decreased with respect to that of PET. All blend samples showed a noticeable brittleness. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 90: 3076–3086, 2003     

Crystallization kinetics of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene 2,6‐naphthalate) blends

The crystallization kinetics of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene 2,6‐naphthalate) (PET/PEN) blends were investigated by DSC as functions of crystallization temperature, blend composition, and PET and PEN source. Isothermal crystallization kinetics were evaluated in terms of the Avrami equation. The Avrami exponent (n) is different for PET, PEN, and the blends, indicating different crystallization mechanisms occurring in blends than those in pure PET and PEN. Activation energies of crystallization were calculated from the rate constants, using an Arrhenius‐type expression. Regime theory was used to elucidate the crystallization course of PET/PEN blends as well as that of unblended PET and PEN. The transition from regime II to regime III was clearly observed for each blend sample as the crystallization temperature was decreased. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 81: 23–37, 2001     

Reactive blending of aromatic polyesters: Thermal and X‐ray analysis of melt‐blended poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(trimethylene terephthalate)

We investigated the reactive melt blending of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT) in terms of the thermal properties and structural features of the resultant materials. Our main objectives were (1) to investigate the effects of the processing conditions on the nonisothermal melt crystallization and subsequent melting behavior of the blends and (2) to assess the effects of the blending time on the structural characteristics of the transreaction products with a fixed composition. The melting parameters (e.g., the melting temperature, melting enthalpy, and crystallization temperature) decreased with the mixing time; the crystallization behavior was strongly affected by the composition and blending time. Moreover, a significant role was played by the final temperature of the heating treatment; this meant that interchange reactions occurred during blending and continued during thermal analysis. The wide‐angle X‐ray diffraction patterns obtained under moderate blending conditions showed the presence of crystalline peaks of PET and PTT; however, the profiles became flatter after blending. This effect was more and more evident as the mixing time increased. Transesterification reactions between the polyesters due to longer blending times with an intermediate composition led to a new copolymer material characterized by its own diffraction profile and a reduced melting temperature. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2011     

Effect of compatibilization on the oxygen‐barrier properties of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(m‐xylylene adipamide) blends

The improvement of the oxygen‐barrier properties of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) via blending with an aromatic polyamide [poly(m‐xylylene adipamide) (MXD6)] was studied. The compatibilization of the blends was attempted through the incorporation of small amounts of sodium 5‐sulfoisophthalate (SIPE) into the PET matrix. The possibility of a transamidation reaction between PET and MXD6 was eliminated by ¹³C‐NMR analysis of melt blends with 20 wt % MXD6. An examination of the blend morphology by atomic force microscopy revealed that SIPE effectively compatibilized the blends by reducing the MXD6 particle size. Thermal analysis showed that MXD6 had a nucleating effect on the crystallization of PET, whereas the crystallization of MXD6 was inhibited, especially in compatibilized blends. Blending 10 wt % MXD6 with PET had only a small effect on the oxygen permeability of the unoriented blend when it was measured at 43% relative humidity, as predicted by the Maxwell model. However, biaxially oriented films with 10 wt % MXD6 had significantly reduced oxygen permeability in comparison with PET. The permeability at 43% relative humidity was reduced by a factor of 3 in compatibilized blends. Biaxial orientation transformed spherical MXD6 domains into platelets oriented in the plane of the film. An enhanced barrier arose from the increased tortuosity of the diffusion pathway due to the high aspect ratio of MXD6 platelets. The aspect ratio was calculated from the macroscopic draw ratio and confirmed by atomic force microscopy. The reduction in permeability was satisfactorily described by the Nielsen model. The decrease in the oxygen permeability of biaxially oriented films was also achieved in bottle walls blown from blends of PET with MXD6. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 97: 1361–1370, 2005     

Melting and crystallization behavior of poly(ethylene terephthalate) and poly(m‐xylylene adipamide) blends

The crystallization and melting behaviors as well as the crystalline morphologies of Poly(ethylene terephthalate)/Poly(m‐xylylene adipamide) (PET/MXD6) blends have been examined and characterized with the aid of differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) and wide angle x‐ray diffraction (WAXD). The isothermal and nonisothermal crystallization behaviors of the blends were studied as functions of the contents of MXD6, catalyst concentrations, and the effects of the interchange reactions between PET and MXD6. Wide angle x‐ray scattering has been used to examine the crystalline morphologies of the PET/MXD6 blends, to characterize their crystalline and amorphous phases, and to determine crystallite sizes in the blends. Results indicate that the catalyst has both catalyzing and nucleation effects on the PET/MXD6 blends, with the extents of each effect dependent upon the content of catalyst. In addition the crystalline morphology was found to be dominated by the MXD6 content as well as the crystallization temperature. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010     

Melt rheology and properties of compatibilized recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate)/(styrene‐ethylene‐ethylene‐propylene‐styrene) block copolymer blends

Blends of recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate) (R‐PET) and (styrene‐ethylene‐ethylene‐propylene‐styrene) block copolymer (SEEPS) compatibilized with (maleic anhydride)‐grafted‐styrene‐ethylene‐butylene‐styrene (SEBS‐g‐MAH) were prepared by melt blending. The compatibilizing effects of SEBS‐g‐MAH were investigated systematically by study of the morphology, linear viscoelastic behavior, and thermal and mechanical properties of the blends. The results show that there is good agreement between the results obtained by rheological measurement and morphological analysis. The rheological test shows that the melt elasticity and melt strength of the blends increase with the addition of SEBS‐g‐MAH. The Cole‐Cole plots and van Gurp‐Palmen plots confirm the compatibilizing effect of SEBS‐g‐MAH. However, the Palierne model fails to predict the linear viscoelastic properties of the blends. The morphology observation shows that all blends exhibit a droplet‐matrix morphology. In addition, the SEEPS particle size in the (R‐PET)/SEEPS blends is significantly decreased and dispersed uniformly by the addition of SEBS‐g‐MAH. Differential scanning calorimeter analysis shows that the crystallization behavior of R‐PET is restricted by the incorporation of SEEPS, whereas the addition of SEBS‐g‐MAH improves the crystallization behavior of R‐PET compared with that of uncompatibilized (R‐PET)/SEEPS blends. The Charpy impact strength of the blends shows the highest value at SEBS‐g‐MAH content of 10%, which is about 210% higher than that of pure R‐PET. J. VINYL ADDIT. TECHNOL., 22:342–349, 2016. © 2014 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Crystallization of poly(tetramethylene succinate) in blends with poly(ϵ‐caprolactone) and poly(ethylene terephthalate)

The crystallization behavior of polymer blends of poly(tetramethylene succinate) (PTMS) with poly(?‐caprolactone) (PCL) or poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) was investigated with differential scanning calorimetry under isothermal and nonisothermal conditions. The blends were prepared by solution casting and precipitation, respectively. The constituent polymers were semicrystalline materials and crystallized nearly independently in the blends. The addition of the second component to PTMS showed that PCL did not significantly influence the crystallinity of the constituents in the blends under isothermal conditions, whereas the crystallization of PTMS was slightly suppressed by crystalline PET. Nonisothermal crystallization under constant cooling rates was examined in terms of a quasi‐isothermal Avrami approach. In blends, the rates of crystallization were differently influenced by the second component. The rate of the constituent that crystallized at the higher temperature was barely influenced by the second component being in the molten state, whereas the rate of the second component, crystallizing when the first component was already crystalline, was altered differently under isothermal and nonisothermal conditions. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 92: 149–160, 2004     

Poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride) ionomers as nucleating agent on the crystallization behavior of poly(ethylene terephthalate)

Poly(styrene‐co‐maleic anhydride) (SMA) ionomers were synthesized and designed as a new kind of nucleation agent according to the crystallization theory for improving the crystallization of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET). The crystallization behavior of PET with the addition of nucleation agents was investigated by differential scanning calorimetry, polarized‐light microscope, and X‐ray diffraction (XRD). Avrami equation and Hoffman–Lauritzen theory are adopted for analyzing isothermal and non‐isothermal crystallization kinetics, respectively. The results show that the addition of 1 wt % SMA ionomers effectively accelerates the crystallization rate and reduces the fold surface free energy of PET at high temperature regions. PLM results also indicated that the crystals impinge on each other, thus decreasing the spherulite size for PET/SMA ionomers samples compared with PET. XRD measurement revealed that the introduction of SMA ionomers does not change the crystal structure but indeed accelerates the crystallinity of PET. The results clearly demonstrate that our synthesized SMA ionomers are an efficient nucleating agent for PET. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015 , 132, 41240.     

Nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of poly(butylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene terephthalate)/glass fiber composites

The influences of the glass fiber (GF) content and the cooling rate for nonisothermal crystallization process of poly(butylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PBT/PET) blends were investigated. The nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of samples were detected by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) at cooling rates of 5°C/min, 10°C/min, 15°C/min, 20°C/min, 25°C/min, respectively. The Jeziony and Mozhishen methods were used to analyze the DSC data. The crystalline morphology of samples was observed with polarized light microscope. Results showed that the Jeziony and Mozhishen methods were available for the analysis of the nonisothermal crystallization process. The peaks of crystallization temperature (T_p) move to low temperature with the cooling rate increasing, crystallization half‐time (t_1/2) decrease accordingly. The crystallization rate of PBT/PET blends increase with the lower GF contents while it is baffled by higher GF contents. POLYM. COMPOS. 36:510–516, 2015. © 2014 Society of Plastics Engineers     

Crystallization of poly(ethylene terephthalate) and poly (butylene terephthalate) modified by diamides

Poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and poly (butylene terephthalate) have been modified by diamide units (0.1–1 mol%) in an extrusion process and the crystallization behavior studied. The diamides used were: for PET, T2T‐dimethyl (N, N′‐bis(p‐carbomethoxybenzoyl)ethanediamine) and for PBT, T4T‐dimethyl (N, N′‐bis(p‐carbomethoxybenzoyl)butanediamine). The above materials were compared to talc (0.5 wt%), this being a standard heterogeneous nucleator, and to diamide modified copolymers obtained by a reactor process. Two PET materials were used: a slowly crystallizing recycled grade obtained from soft drink bottles and a rapidly crystallizing injection molding grade. The crystallization was studied by differential scanning calometry (DSC) and under injection molding conditions using wedge shaped specimens; the thermal properties were studied by dynamic mechanical analysis. T2T‐dimethyl is effective in increasing the crystallization of PET in both of the extrusion compounds as well as in the reactor materials. It was also found that the crystallization temperature of poly(butylene terephthalate) could be slightly increased by the addition of nucleators.     

Nonisothermal crystallization kinetics and morphology of poly(ethylene terephthalate) modified with poly(lactic acid)

The nonisothermal crystallization kinetics of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) copolymers modified with poly(lactic acid) (PLA) were investigated with differential scanning calorimetry, and a crystal morphology of the samples was observed with scanning electron microscopy. Waste PET (P100) obtained from postconsumer water bottles was modified with a low‐molecular‐weight PLA. The PET/PLA weight ratio was 90/10 (P90) or 50/50 (P50) in the modified samples. The nonisothermal melt‐crystallization kinetics of the modified samples were compared with those of P100. The segmented block copolymer structure (PET‐b‐PLA‐b‐PET) of the modified samples formed by a transesterification reaction between the PLA and PET units in solution and the length of the aliphatic and aromatic blocks were found to have a great effect on the nucleation mechanism and overall crystallization rate. On the basis of the results of the crystallization kinetics determined by several models (Ozawa, Avrami, Jeziorny, and Liu–Mo) and morphological observations, the crystallization rate of the samples decreased in the order of P50 > P90 > P100, depending on the amount of PLA in the copolymer structure. However, the apparent crystallization activation energies of the samples decreased in the order of P90 > P100 > P50. It was concluded that the nucleation rate and mechanism were affected significantly by the incorporation of PLA into the copolymer structure and that these also had an effect on the overall crystallization energy barrier. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2007     

Glass‐transition and melting behavior of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene 2,6‐naphthalate) blends

The glass‐transition temperatures and melting behaviors of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(ethylene 2,6‐naphthalate) (PET/PEN) blends were studied. Two blend systems were used for this work, with PET and PEN of different grades. It was found that T_g increases almost linearly with blend composition. Both the Gibbs–DiMarzio equation and the Fox equation fit experimental data very well, indicating copolymer‐like behavior of the blend systems. Multiple melting peaks were observed for all blend samples as well as for PET and PEN. The equilibrium melting point was obtained using the Hoffman–Weeks method. The melting points of PET and PEN were depressed as a result of the formation of miscible blends and copolymers. The Flory–Huggins theory was used to study the melting‐point depression for the blend system, and the Nishi–Wang equation was used to calculate the interaction parameter (χ₁₂). The calculated χ₁₂ is a small negative number, indicating the formation of thermodynamically stable, miscible blends. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 81: 11–22, 2001     

Crystallization behavior of fully biodegradable poly(lactic acid)/poly(butylene adipate‐co‐terephthalate) blends

Both poly(lactic acid) (PLA) and poly(butylene adipate‐co‐terephthalate) (PBAT) are fully biodegradable polyesters. The disadvantages of poor mechanical properties of PLA limit its wide application. Fully biodegradable polymer blends were prepared by blending PLA with PBAT. Crystallization behavior of neat and blended PLA was investigated by differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), polarizing optical microscopy (POM), and wide angle X‐ray diffraction (WAXD). Experiment results indicated that in comparison with neat PLA, the degree of crystallinity of PLA in various blends all markedly was increased, and the crystallization mechanism almost did not change. The equilibrium melting point of PLA initially decreased with the increase of PBAT content and then increased when PBAT content in the blends was 60 wt % compared to neat PLA. In the case of the isothermal crystallization of neat PLA and its blends at the temperature range of 123–142°C, neat PLA and its blends exhibited bell shape curves for the growth rates, and the maximum crystallization rate of neat PLA and its blends all depended on crystallization temperature and their component. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009     

Thermal properties and phase morphology of melt‐mixed poly(trimethylene terephthalate)/poly(hexamethylene isophthalamide) blends

This work examines the thermal properties and phase morphology of melt‐mixed poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT)/poly(hexamethylene isophthalamide) (PA 6I) blends. Two temperatures, i.e., 250 and 260°C, are used to prepare the blends, respectively. Differential scanning calorimetry results indicate the immiscible feature of the blends. It is thus concluded that the ester‐amide interchange reaction hardly occurred in the PTT/PA 6I blends. Depending on the composition and mixing temperature, the crystallization ability of PTT in the blends is either enhanced or hindered. Basically, a lower PA 6I content shifts the PTT melt crystallization to a higher temperature, whereas a higher PA 6I content causes an opposing outcome. The original complex melting behavior of neat PTT becomes more regular after the incorporation of 60 wt % or 80 wt % of PA 6I. Thermogravimetry analyses (TGA) show that the thermal stability of the blends improves as the PA 6I content increases. The two‐phased morphology of the blends is examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Polarized light microscopy (PLM) results reveal that the PTT spherulites become coarser with the inclusion of PA 6I; only smaller/dispersed crystallites are observed in the blend with 20 wt % of PTT. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Improvement of compatibility of poly(ethylene terephthalate) and poly(ethylene octene) blends by γ‐irradiation

Blends of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) and poly(ethylene octene) (POE) were prepared by melt blending with various amounts of trimethylolpropane triacylate (TMPTA). The mechanical properties, phase morphologies, and gel fractions at various absorbed doses of γ‐irradiation have been investigated. It was found that the toughness of blends was enhanced effectively after irradiation as well as the tensile properties. The elongation at break for all studied PET/POE blends (POE being up to 15 wt %) with 2 wt % TMPTA reached 250–400% at most absorbed doses of γ‐irradiation, approximately 50–80 times of those of untreated PET/POE blends. The impact strength of PET/POE (85/15 wt/wt) blends with 2 wt % TMPTA irradiated with as little as 30 kGy absorbed dose exceeded 17 kJ/m², being approximately 3.4 times of those of untreated blends. The improvement of the mechanical properties was supported by the morphology changes. Scanning electron microscope images of fracture surfaces showed a smaller dispersed phase and more indistinct inter‐phase boundaries in the irradiated blends. This indicates increased compatibility of PET and POE in the PET/POE blends. The changes of the morphologies and the enhancement of the mechanical properties were ascribed to the enhanced inter‐phase boundaries by the formation of complex graft structures confirmed by the results of the gelation extraction and Fourier Transform Infrared analyses. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2013     

Miscibility and melting behavior of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/poly(trimethylene terephthalate) blends

The miscibility and melting behavior of binary crystalline blends of poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET)/poly(trimethylene terephthalate) (PTT) have been investigated with differential scanning calorimetry and scanning electron microscope. The blends exhibit a single composition‐dependent glass transition temperature (T_g) and the measured T_g fit well with the predicted T_g value by the Fox equation and Gordon‐Taylor equation. In addition to that, a single composition‐dependent cold crystallization temperature (T_cc) value can be observed and it decreases nearly linearly with the low T_g component, PTT, which can also be taken as a valid supportive evidence for miscibility. The SEM graphs showed complete homogeneity in the fractured surfaces of the quenched PET/PTT blends, which provided morphology evidence of a total miscibility of PET/PTT blend in amorphous state at all compositions. The polymer–polymer interaction parameter, χ₁₂, calculated from equilibrium melting temperature depression of the PET component was ?0.1634, revealing miscibility of PET/PTT blends in the melting state. The melting crystallization temperature (T_mc) of the blends decreased with an increase of the minor component and the 50/50 sample showed the lowest T_mc value, which is also related to its miscible nature in the melting state. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2008     

Phase structure and properties of poly(ethylene terephthalate)/high‐density polyethylene based on recycled materials

Blends based on recycled high density polyethylene (R‐HDPE) and recycled poly(ethylene terephthalate) (R‐PET) were made through reactive extrusion. The effects of maleated polyethylene (PE‐g‐MA), triblock copolymer of styrene and ethylene/butylene (SEBS), and 4,4′‐methylenedi(phenyl isocyanate) (MDI) on blend properties were studied. The 2% PE‐g‐MA improved the compatibility of R‐HDPE and R‐PET in all blends toughened by SEBS. For the R‐HDPE/R‐PET (70/30 w/w) blend toughened by SEBS, the dispersed PET domain size was significantly reduced with use of 2% PE‐g‐MA, and the impact strength of the resultant blend doubled. For blends with R‐PET matrix, all strengths were improved by adding MDI through extending the PET molecular chains. The crystalline behaviors of R‐HDPE and R‐PET in one‐phase rich systems influenced each other. The addition of PE‐g‐MA and SEBS consistently reduced the crystalline level (χ_c) of either the R‐PET or the R‐HDPE phase and lowered the crystallization peak temperature (T_c) of R‐PET. Further addition of MDI did not influence R‐HDPE crystallization behavior but lowered the χ_c of R‐PET in R‐PET rich blends. The thermal stability of R‐HDPE/R‐PET 70/30 and 50/50 (w/w) blends were improved by chain‐extension when 0.5% MDI was added. © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2009