Single Arc Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy of head and neck cancer

Background

The quality of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) plans is highly dependent on the performance of the optimization algorithm used. Recently new algorithms have become available which are capable of generating VMAT plans for Elekta accelerators. The VMAT algorithm in Pinnacle³® is named SmartArc and its capability to generate treatment plans for head and neck cancer was tested.

Methods

Twenty-five patients with oropharyngeal or hypopharyngeal carcinoma, previously treated with IMRT by means of Pinnacle³® and Elekta accelerators, were replanned with single arc VMAT. The VMAT planning objectives were to achieve clinical target coverage and sparing of the organs at risk (OAR). Comparison with the original clinically used IMRT was made by evaluating (1) dose-volume histograms (DVHs) for PTVs, (2) DVHs for OARs, (3) delivery time and monitor units (MU), and (4) treatment accuracy.

Results

Equivalent or superior target coverage and sparing of OARs were achieved with VMAT compared to IMRT. Volumes in the healthy tissues receiving between 17.3 Gy and 49.4 Gy were significantly reduced and the conformity (CI_95%) of the elective PTV was improved from 1.7 with IMRT to 1.6 with VMAT. Compared to step-and-shoot IMRT, VMAT reduced the number of MUs by 8.5% to 460 ± 63 MUs per fraction, and delivered on an Elekta Synergy accelerator, the treatment time was on average reduced by 35% to 241 ± 16 s. In Delta4® measurements of the VMAT treatments, 99.6 ± 0.5% of the detector points passed a 3 mm and 3% gamma criterion, identical to the results of IMRT.

Conclusions

The target coverages obtained in the IMRT and VMAT plans were found to be very similar. SmartArc generated single arc VMAT plans with equivalent or better target coverage and sparing of OARs compared to IMRT, while both delivery time and MUs were decreased. Very good dose accuracy results were obtained delivering the plans on an Elekta accelerator.     

Clinical significance of multi-leaf collimator positional errors for volumetric modulated arc therapy

Background and purpose

Multi-leaf collimator (MLC) positional errors occur during intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) deliveries. The impact of such errors has been evaluated for IMRT but not VMAT. The purpose of this work is to understand how random and systematic VMAT MLC positional errors affect the patient dose distribution.

Materials and methods

Eight head and neck single arc (360°) VMAT treatment plans were created. Random and two types of systematic MLC errors were simulated for error magnitudes of 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2 and 5 mm. The two types of systematic MLC errors were: (1) MLC banks are shifted in the same direction (left or right) and (2) MLC banks are shifted in opposing directions resulting in smaller or larger field shapes. The MLC errors were simulated, for all control points, on both banks of active MLC leaves only.

Results

There is a linear correlation of MLC errors with gEUD for all error types. The gEUD dose sensitivities with MLC error for the PTV70 were −0.2, −0.9, −2.8 and 1.9 Gy/mm for random, systematic shift, systematic close and systematic open MLC errors, respectively. The sensitivity of VMAT plans to MLC positional errors was similar to those of IMRT plans with less than 50 segments but much less than those created for a step and shoot with more than 50 segments or sliding-window delivery technique. To maintain the PTV70 to within 2% would require that MLC open/close errors be within 0.6 mm.

Conclusions

Radiation therapy centers should have adequate quality assurance programs in place to assess open/close MLC errors (i.e. leaf gap errors) as they tend to be more impactful than random or systematic MLC shift errors.     

A comparison of several modulated radiotherapy techniques for head and neck cancer and dosimetric validation of VMAT

Purpose

Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) has the potential to shorten treatment times for fluence modulated radiotherapy. We compared dose distributions of VMAT, step-and-shoot IMRT and serial tomotherapy for typical head and neck (H&N) planning target volumes (PTV) with sparing of one parotid, a complex paradigm and a situation often encountered in H&N radiotherapy. Finally, we validated the dosimetric accuracy of VMAT delivery.

Material and methods

Based on CT datasets of 10 patients treated for H&N cancer (PTV1:60 Gy/PTV2:56 Gy) with IMRT (7/9 fields), serial tomotherapy (MIMiC) and VMAT were compared with regard to plan quality and treatment efficiency. Plan quality was assessed by calculating homogeneity/conformity index (HI/CI), mean dose to parotid and brain stem and the maximum dose to the spinal cord. For plan efficiency evaluation, total treatment time (TTT) and number of monitor units (MU) were considered. A dosimetric evaluation of VMAT was performed using radiosensitive film, ion chamber and 2D-array.

Results

For MIMiC/IMRT_7F/IMRT_9F/VMAT, mean CI was 1.98/2.23/2.23/1.82, HI_PTV1 was 1.12/1.20/1.20/1.11 and HI_PTV2 was 1.11/1.15/1.13/1.12. Mean doses to the shielded parotid were 19.5 Gy/14.1 Gy/13.9 Gy/14.9 Gy and the spinal cord received maximum doses of 43.6 Gy/40.8 Gy/41.6 Gy/42.6 Gy. The mean MU’s were 2551/945/925/521 and the mean TTT was 12.8 min/7.6 min/8.5 min/4.32 min. The ion chamber measurements showed an absolute deviation of 0.08 ± 1.10% and 98.45 ± 3.25% pixels passed γ-analyses for 3%/3 mm and 99.95 ± 0.09% for 5%/5 mm for films. 2D-array measurements reported an agreement for 3%/3 mm of 95.65 ± 2.47%-98.33 ± 0.65% and for 5%/5 mm 99.79 ± 0.24%-99.92 ± 0.09% depending on the measurement protocol.

Conclusion

All treatment paradigms produced plans of excellent quality and dosimetric accuracy with IMRT providing best OAR sparing and VMAT being the most efficient treatment option in our comparison of treatment plans with high complexity.     

Volumetric modulated arc therapy versus conventional intensity modulated radiation therapy for stereotactic spine radiotherapy: A planning study and early clinical data

Background and purpose

Outcomes for selected patients with spinal metastases may be improved by dose escalation using stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). As target geometry is complex, we compared SBRT plans using volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy (RapidArc®, RA) and conventional intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).

Materials and methods

RA and IMRT plans to deliver a fraction of 16 Gy to at least 90% of planning target volume (PTV) were compared for PTV coverage, normal organ sparing and estimated delivery times. Group 1 consisted of PTVs to only vertebral body (n = 3), while group 2 had PTVs encompassing the entire vertebra (n = 4). Finally, RA delivery parameters in four patients were assessed.

Results

Both techniques delivered 16 Gy to a mean of 95% and 85% of the PTV in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Spinal cord sparing was comparable; mean V_{10-partial cord} for RA and IMRT in group 1 was 3.6%, and was 9.4% versus 11.5%, respectively, in group 2. Estimated mean treatment times for RA with 2-3 arcs and IMRT were comparable. Clinical RA beam-on times ranged from 11 to 15.4 min.

Conclusions

Both RA and conventional IMRT plans deliver high quality vertebral SBRT, but plan quality was poorer when the PTV consisted of the entire vertebra.     

Dose escalation in the radiotherapy of non-small-cell lung cancer with aperture-based intensity modulation and photon beam energy optimization for non-preselected patients

Purpose

To verify the potential of aperture-based intensity-modulated radiotherapy (AB-IMRT) to realize dose escalation plans for non-preselected non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, using photon beam energy optimization.

Methods and materials

Seven cases of NSCLC were retrospectively studied. Clinical reference plans were made at 60 Gy by an experienced dosimetrist. Dose escalation was applied to PTV2, a subvolume within the main PTV1. Escalation plans were optimized by considering beam angles (table and gantry), energy (6 and 23 MV) and weights, for an increasing dose to the PTV2, starting from 66 Gy and keeping 30 fractions.

Results

In five cases, doses over 78 Gy could be achieved before exceeding organs at risk (OARs) standard tolerance. Peripheral overdosages, as well as lung and spinal cord tolerance doses, limited escalation. Means ± SD V_95% parameters were (97.3 ± 0.9)% for PTV1s and (96.7 ± 2.2)% for PTV2s. Doses to OARs were also maintained at acceptable levels. Optimized plans made use of both low- and high-energy beams and had a similar number of monitor units compared to the 60 Gy clinical plans.

Conclusions

The AB-IMRT system can successfully realize dose escalation for a sizeable number of cases. Plans produced contained few large segments, and are applicable to a wide range of tumor volumes and locations.     

Unilateral radiotherapy for tonsil cancer: Potential dose distribution optimization with a simple two-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy beam arrangement

Background and purpose

To evaluate the feasibility and dosimetric optimization potential of a unilateral two-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) technique in the curative treatment of lateralized tonsil cancer.

Materials and methods

Six patients with lateralized tonsillar carcinoma were treated unilaterally with a two-field IMRT technique (oblique-anterior and oblique-posterior fields, with or without collimator and couch rotation). Alternative IMRT plans using seven non-opposed coplanar fields were compared with the two-field plans for each patient.

Results

Planning target volume (PTV) coverage was excellent with the two-field technique, using a relatively low number of monitor units (MU) (median, 441; range, 309-550). Dose constraints were respected for all organs at risk (OAR). Mean doses to contralateral parotid and submandibular glands were 3.9 and 17.7 Gy, respectively. Seven-field IMRT provided similar PTV coverage, with statistically significant better dose homogeneity and conformality. However, the mean delivered dose to the contralateral parotid (3.9 vs. 9.0 Gy, p = 0.001) as well as the mean number of MU (437 vs. 814, p = 0.002) and consequently machine time were lower with two-field IMRT.

Conclusions

Unilateral two-field IMRT is a simple and feasible technique providing excellent tumor coverage and optimal OAR sparing while reducing the number of MU and treatment time.     

Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) vs. serial tomotherapy, step-and-shoot IMRT and 3D-conformal RT for treatment of prostate cancer

Introduction

Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), a complex treatment strategy for intensity-modulated radiation therapy, may increase treatment efficiency and has recently been established clinically. This analysis compares VMAT against established IMRT and 3D-conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) delivery techniques.

Methods

Based on CT datasets of 9 patients treated for prostate cancer step-and-shoot IMRT, serial tomotherapy (MIMiC), 3D-CRT and VMAT were compared with regard to plan quality and treatment efficiency. Two VMAT approaches (one rotation (VMAT1x) and one rotation plus a second 200° rotation (VMAT2x)) were calculated for the plan comparison. Plan quality was assessed by calculating homogeneity and conformity index (HI and CI), dose to normal tissue (non-target) and D_95% (dose encompassing 95% of the target volume). For plan efficiency evaluation, treatment time and number of monitor units (MU) were considered.

Results

For MIMiC/IMRT_MLC/VMAT2x/VMAT1x/3D-CRT, mean CI was 1.5/1.23/1.45/1.51/1.46 and HI was 1.19/1.1/1.09/1.11/1.04. For a prescribed dose of 76 Gy, mean doses to organs-at-risk (OAR) were 50.69 Gy/53.99 Gy/60.29 Gy/61.59 Gy/66.33 Gy for the anterior half of the rectum and 31.85 Gy/34.89 Gy/38.75 Gy/38.57 Gy/55.43 Gy for the posterior rectum. Volumes of non-target normal tissue receiving ?70% of prescribed dose (53 Gy) were 337 ml/284 ml/482 ml/505 ml/414 ml, for ? 50% (38 Gy) 869 ml/933 ml/1155 ml/1231 ml/1993 ml and for ? 30% (23 Gy) 2819 ml/3414 ml/3340 ml/3438 ml /3061 ml. D_95% was 69.79 Gy/70.51 Gy/71,7 Gy/71.59 Gy/73.42 Gy. Mean treatment time was 12 min/6 min/3.7 min/1.8 min/2.5 min.

Conclusion

All approaches yield treatment plans of improved quality when compared to 3D-conformal treatments, with serial tomotherapy providing best OAR sparing and VMAT being the most efficient treatment option in our comparison. Plans which were calculated with 3D-CRT provided good target coverage but resulted in higher dose to the rectum.     

Carbon-11 acetate PET/CT based dose escalated IMRT in prostate cancer

Purpose

To demonstrate the theoretical feasibility of [¹¹C]acetate PET/CT in delineating the malignant intraprostatic lesions (IPL’s) in prostate cancer and to use the data in external beam radiotherapy to boost the biologically defined target volume (BTV).

Methods and materials

Twelve men with intracapsular prostate carcinoma were imaged with [¹¹C]acetate PET/CT and the data were used to delineate the BTV. Six dynamic IMRT plans were generated to each patient: a standard IMRT (sIMRT) plan with a 77.9 Gy dose to PTV (prostate gland with a 6-mm margin) and a simultaneous integrated boost IMRT (SIB_IMRT) plan to deliver 77.9 Gy, 81 Gy, 84 Gy, 87 Gy and 90 Gy to the BTV and 72 Gy to the rest of PTV. To study the theoretical dose escalation based on the delineation of BTV, tumor control probabilities (TCPs) and normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs) of bladder and rectum were calculated and compared between the treatment plans.

Results

[¹¹C]Acetate was used to delineate the IPL’s of all 12 patients. With every patient the TCP was increased with SIB_IMRT without increasing the NTCP of the bladder or rectum. The probability of uncomplicated control (PUC) was increased on average by 28% with the SIB_IMRT treatment plans. The highest PUC was achieved with an average dose of 82.1 Gy to the BTV.

Conclusions

Our study indicates that [¹¹C]acetate can be used to define the IPL’s and in combination with SIB_IMRT the defined areas can theoretically be treated to ultra high doses without increasing the treatment toxicity. These results motivate the formal validation of [¹¹C]acetate PET for biological dose planning in prostate cancer.     

Volumetric modulated arc therapy and breath-hold in image-guided locoregional left-sided breast irradiation

Purpose

To investigate the effects of using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and/or voluntary moderate deep inspiration breath-hold (vmDIBH) in the radiation therapy (RT) of left-sided breast cancer including the regional lymph nodes.

Materials and methods

For 13 patients, four treatment combinations were compared; 3D-conformal RT (i.e., forward IMRT) in free-breathing 3D-CRT(FB), 3D-CRT(vmDIBH), 2 partial arcs VMAT(FB), and VMAT(vmDIBH). Prescribed dose was 42.56 Gy in 16 fractions. For 10 additional patients, 3D-CRT and VMAT in vmDIBH only were also compared.

Results

Dose conformity, PTV coverage, ipsilateral and total lung doses were significantly better for VMAT plans compared to 3D-CRT. Mean heart dose (D_mean,heart) reduction in 3D-CRT(vmDIBH) was between 0.9 and 8.6 Gy, depending on initial D_mean,heart (in 3D-CRT(FB) plans). VMAT(vmDIBH) reduced the D_mean,heart further when D_mean,heart was still >3.2 Gy in 3D-CRT(vmDIBH). Mean contralateral breast dose was higher for VMAT plans (2.7 Gy) compared to 3DCRT plans (0.7 Gy).

Conclusions

VMAT and 3D-CRT(vmDIBH) significantly reduced heart dose for patients treated with locoregional RT of left-sided breast cancer. When D_mean,heart exceeded 3.2 Gy in 3D-CRT(vmDIBH) plans, VMAT(vmDIBH) resulted in a cumulative heart dose reduction. VMAT also provided better target coverage and reduced ipsilateral lung dose, at the expense of a small increase in the dose to the contralateral breast.     

Increased organ sparing using shape-based treatment plan optimization for intensity modulated radiation therapy of pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Purpose

To develop a model to assess the quality of an IMRT treatment plan using data of prior patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Methods

The dose to an organ at risk (OAR) depends in large part on its orientation and distance to the planning target volume (PTV). A database of 33 previously treated patients with pancreatic cancer was queried to find patients with less favorable PTV-OAR configuration than a new case. The minimal achieved dose among the selected patients should also be achievable for the OAR of the new case. This way the achievable doses to the OARs of 25 randomly selected pancreas cancer patients were predicted. The patients were replanned to verify if the predicted dose could be achieved. The new plans were compared to their original clinical plans.

Results

The predicted doses were achieved within 1 and 2 Gy for more than 82% and 94% of the patients, respectively, and were a good approximation of the minimal achievable doses. The improvement after replanning was 1.4 Gy (range 0-4.6 Gy) and 1.7 Gy (range 0-6.3 Gy) for the mean dose to the liver and the kidneys, respectively, without compromising target coverage or increasing radiation dose to the bowel, cord or stomach.

Conclusions

The model could accurately predict the achievable doses, leading to a considerable decrease in dose to the OARs and an increase in treatment planning efficiency.     

Volumetric modulated arc therapy for delivery of hypofractionated stereotactic lung radiotherapy: A dosimetric and treatment efficiency analysis

Purpose/objective(s)

Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) allows for intensity-modulated radiation delivery during gantry rotation with dynamic MLC motion, variable dose rates and gantry speed modulation. We compared VMAT plans with 3D-CRT for hypofractionated lung radiotherapy.

Materials/methods

Twenty-one 3D-CRT plans for Stage IA lung cancer previously treated stereotactically were selected. VMAT plans were generated by optimizing machine aperture shape and radiation intensity at 10° intervals. A partial arc range of 180° was manually selected to coincide with tumor location. The arc was resampled down to 5° intervals to ensure dose calculation accuracy. Identical planning objectives were used for VMAT/3D-CRT. Parameters assessed included dose to PTV and organs-at-risk (OAR), monitor units, and multiple conformity and homogeneity indices. Plans were delivered to a phantom for time comparison.

Results

Lung V_20/12.5/10/5 were less with VMAT (relative reduction 4.5%, p = .02; 3.2%, p = .01; 2.6%, p = .01; 4.2%, p = .03, respectively). Mean/maximum-doses to PTV, dose to additional OARs, 95% isodose line conformity, and target volume homogeneity were equivalent. VMAT improved conformity at both the 80% (1.87 vs. 1.93, p = .08) and 50% isodose lines (5.19 vs. 5.65, p = .01). Treatment times were reduced significantly with VMAT (mean 6.1 vs. 11.9 min, p < .01).

Conclusions

Single arc VMAT planning achieves highly conformal dose distributions while controlling dose to critical structures, including significant reduction in lung dose volume parameters. Employing a VMAT technique decreases treatment times by 37-63%, reducing the chance of error introduced by intrafraction variation. The quality and efficiency of VMAT is ideally suited for stereotactic lung radiotherapy delivery.     

Intensity modulated radiotherapy in the management of sacral chordoma in primary versus recurrent disease

Purpose

To investigate treatment outcome in patients suffering from sacral chordoma after intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for primary versus recurrent disease.

Material/methods

We report on 34 patients with histologically proven sacral chordoma. Seventeen patients were treated at time of initial diagnosis with post-operative IMRT (n = 13) or with IMRT alone (n = 4). Seventeen patients were treated in recurrent disease after surgery (n = 11) or with radiotherapy alone (n = 6). Median total dose to the boost volume (PTV2) was 66 Gy (range, 72-54) with 2 Gy per fraction using an integrated boost concept. Median dose to target volume (PTV1) was 54 Gy in 1.8 Gy.

Results

Local control was 35% (12/34) and overall survival 74% (25/34) after a median follow-up of 4.5 years. Actuarial local control was 79%, 55% and 27% after 1, 2 and 5 years, respectively. Local control was significantly higher in patients treated for primary tumors (p < 0.03) and in total doses >60 Gy (p < 0.01). Actuarial overall survival was 97%, 91% and 70% after 1, 2 and 5 years, respectively.

Conclusion

These data demonstrate that local control after IMRT is higher in patients treated for primary tumors and using higher radiation doses. Therefore, we recommend radiotherapy as part of initial treatment in sacral chordoma.     

Minimising contralateral breast dose in post-mastectomy intensity-modulated radiotherapy by incorporating conformal electron irradiation

Purpose

To assess the potential benefit of incorporating conformal electron irradiation in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for loco-regional post-mastectomy RT.

Patients and methods

Ten consecutive patients that underwent left-sided mastectomy were selected for this comparative planning study. Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) photon-electron dose plans were compared to photon-only IMRT (IMRT_p) and photon IMRT with conformal electron irradiation (IMRT_p/e). The planning target volume (PTV) was prescribed 50 Gy and included the chest wall and the internal mammary and supra-clavicular lymph node regions. It was attempted to minimise dose delivered to heart, lungs and contralateral breast (CB), while maintaining adequate PTV coverage.

Results

All plans complied with objectives for PTV coverage. IMRT_p/e eliminated volumes receiving ?70 Gy (V70) that were present in 3D-CRT at the junction of photon and electron beams. Both IMRT strategies reduced heart V30 significantly below 3D-CRT levels. Mean heart dose with IMRT_p/e was the lowest and was equal to that with 3D-CRT. Minimising heart dose with IMRT_p resulted in irradiated CB volumes much larger than that with 3D-CRT. With IMRT_p/e, CB dose was only slightly increased when compared to 3D-CRT. Mean lung dose values were similar for IMRT and 3D-CRT. With IMRT, lung V20 was smaller, whereas V5 values for heart, lung and CB were higher than those with 3D-CRT.

Conclusions

Incorporation of conformal electron irradiation in post-mastectomy IMRT_p/e enables a heart dose reduction which can only be obtained with IMRT_p when allowing large irradiated volumes in the contralateral breast.     

Determining DVH parameters for combined external beam and brachytherapy treatment: 3D biological dose adding for patients with cervical cancer

Purpose

To compare two methods of DVH parameter determination for combined external beam and brachytherapy treatment of cervical cancer.

Materials and methods

Clinical treatment plans from five patients were used in this study. We simulated two applications given with PDR (32 × 60 cGy per application, given hourly) or HDR (4 × 7 Gy in two applications; each application of two fractions of 7 Gy, given within 17 h) standard and optimised treatment plans, all combined with IMRT (25 × 1.8 Gy). Additionally, we simulated an external beam (EBRT) boost to pathological lymph nodes or the parametrium (7 × 2 Gy).We determined D90 of the high-risk CTV (HR-CTV) and D_2cc of bladder and rectum in EQD2 in two ways. (1) ‘Parameter adding’: assuming a uniform contribution of the EBRT dose distribution and adding the values of DVH parameters for the two brachytherapy insertions, and (2) ‘distributions adding’: summing 3D biological dose distributions of IMRT and brachytherapy plans and subsequently determining the values of the DVH parameters. We took α/β = 10 Gy for HR-CTV, α/β = 3 Gy otherwise and half-time of repair 1.5 h.

Results

Without EBRT boost, ‘parameter adding’ yielded a good approximation. With an EBRT boost to lymph nodes, the total D90 HR-CTV was underestimated by 2.6 (SD 1.3)% for PDR and 2.8 (SD 1.4)% for HDR. This was even worse with a parametrium boost: 9.1 (SD 6.2)% for PDR and 9.9 (SD 6.2)% for HDR.

Conclusion

Without an EBRT boost ‘parameter adding’, as proposed by the GEC-ESTRO, yielded accurate results for the values for DVH parameters. If an EBRT boost is given ‘distributions adding’ should be considered.     

Sequentially delivered boost plans are superior to simultaneously delivered plans in head and neck cancer when the boost volume is located further away from the parotid glands

Purpose

To find parameters that predict which head and neck patients benefit from a sequentially delivered boost treatment plan compared to a simultaneously delivered plan, with the aim to spare the salivary glands.

Methods and materials

We evaluated 50 recently treated head and neck cancer patients. Apart from the clinical plan with a sequentially (SEQ) given boost using an Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy Technique (IMRT), a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique plan was constructed with the same beam set-up. The mean dose to the parotid glands was calculated and compared. The elective nodal areas were bilateral in all cases, with a boost on either one side or both sides of the neck.

Results

When the parotid gland volume and the Planning Target Volume (PTV) for the boost overlap there is on average a lower dose to the parotid gland with a SIB technique (−1.2 Gy), which is, however, not significant (p = 0.08).For all parotid glands with no boost PTV overlap, there is a benefit from a SEQ technique compared to a SIB technique for the gland evaluated (on average a 2.5 Gy lower dose to the parotid gland, p < 0.001). When the distance between gland and PTV is 0-1 cm, this difference is on average 0.8 Gy, for 1-2 cm distance 2.9 Gy and for glands with a distance greater than 2 cm, 3.3 Gy. When the lymph nodes on the evaluated side are also included in the boost PTV, however, this relationship between the distance and the gain of a SEQ seems less clear.

Conclusions

A sequentially delivered boost technique results in a better treatment plan for most cases, compared to a simultaneous integrated boost IMRT technique, if the boost PTV is more than 1 cm away from at least one parotid gland.