Effects of therapy goal oriented cognitive behavioural aftercare measures on therapy transfer following inpatient psychosomatic rehabilitation

OBJECTIVE: After discharge from inpatient psychosomatic rehabilitation patients often face problems to transfer and stabilize the modifications they have achieved in the clinic. Using targeted outpatient aftercare interventions up to eight weeks after discharge from the inpatient programme we tried to support this transfer, thus enhancing treatment effectiveness. METHOD: The evaluation was carried out as a field experiment. Patients were matched into pairs and then allocated randomly to either a control or an experimental condition. The experimental group, which had participated in specific aftercare measures after inpatient therapy, was compared to the control group at "discharge from clinic" and "twelve weeks post-discharge" relative to a number of variables relevant in therapy outcome. RESULTS: Twelve weeks post-discharge patients who had participated in aftercare measures show significantly better progress relative to their physical and psychological complaints than patients in the control group. Also, they are more capable of coping with psychosocial demands of their everyday life. They experience better control of their symptoms and they are more successful in attaining the goals they have set for themselves for the time after discharge. CONCLUSIONS: The findings show that supplementing psychosomatic inpatient rehabilitation with specific aftercare measures will lead to better transfer and to increased effectiveness of psychosomatic rehabilitation. Also on account of our results, outpatient rehab aftercare programmes have in the meantime become a regular component of inpatient psychosomatic rehabilitation in Germany.     

Pre- and post-treatment in inpatient psychosomatic rehabilitation

Patients who are referred to psychosomatic inpatient rehabilitation are mostly suffering from long-term illnesses. Therefore, it is necessary to take pre- and post-treatment into account. Epidemiological questions are frequency and type of pre- and post-treatment and their relation to course and outcome of rehabilitation. Pre-treatment, recommendations for follow-up treatment, and course of treatment in 1284 patients of the department of behaviour therapy and psychosomatics of the rehabilitation centre Seehof were assessed. Before admission, 75.4 % of patients had been in psychiatric treatment, and 31.3 % had received psychotherapy. The inpatient stay was significantly longer in patients with psychiatric pre-treatment and those with a combination of psychiatric treatment and psychotherapy. These patients were more often unemployed and showing an insufficient social network. Pre-treatment was unrelated to changes in the SCL-90-R, to physician ratings of therapeutic outcome or the ability to work at the end of rehabilitation. Patients pre-treated by a general practitioner, psychiatrist or psychotherapist returned to that therapeutic setting after rehabilitation. Patients only treated by general practitioners were referred to specialist treatment. These data show the need to integrate inpatient rehabilitation in long-term pre- and post-treatment. One effect of inpatient rehabilitation is to optimize treatment. This requires good communication across different areas of health care.     

Outpatient orthopaedic rehabilitation: treatment,outcomes and costs as compared to inpatient rehabilitation

In a parallel design the study examined an outpatient rehabilitation model project for patients of the pension insurance scheme of Rhineland-Palatinate (LVA Rheinland-Pfalz). In 6 centers for the rehabilitation of musculoskeletal diseases patients were assessed at the beginning and at the end of rehabilitation as well as six and twelve months after discharge. In this article the final results concerning therapeutic measures as well as health-related and economic outcomes are presented. Not included are aspects of differential utilization and the perception of the rehabilitation by the clients, which will be published in a separate article. No large differences were found concerning participation in the various therapeutic measures. As measured by the main score and the sub-dimensions of the IRES patient questionnaire, effects of the same magnitude were found for the parallelized samples. Equally, no differences in outcome quality were found concerning the great majority of medical parameters documented in a doctors' questionnaire, the rate of applications for pension, occupational status twelve months after rehabilitation, as well as the reduction of sick-leave. The economic evaluation was carried out only from the perspective of the pension insurance agency. Considerable differences were found in the net costs of rehabilitation: although there are no user charges for patients in outpatient rehabilitation, mean expenditure was about 970 EURO lower than in inpatient rehabilitation. The study findings demonstrate that the concept of interdisciplinary rehabilitation has been realized in the outpatient centers as well and that the centers have reached an effectiveness comparable to that of inpatient rehabilitation. At least those patients who actively choose the outpatient setting gain as much as patients in inpatient rehabilitation.     

Motivation for psychosomatic-psychotherapeutic treatment of vocational stresses -- development and validation of a questionnaire

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of questionnaires assessing the motivation of inpatients to scrutinize occupational stresses and deal with them as part of their psychotherapeutic treatment. Work-related stress contributes significantly to the development of mental disorders. Vocational reintegration is an outcome criterion for the success of vocational rehabilitation. Patients are often not motivated for dealing with occupational stresses during inpatient medical rehabilitation. Therefore it is necessary to assess patient motivation at the beginning of treatment, in order to assign them to specific interventions, e. g. promoting motivation. METHOD: A questionnaire (Fragebogen zur berufsbezogenen Therapiemotivation -- FBTM) consisting of 84 items was developed, based on published questionnaires for psychotherapy motivation. 283 psychosomatic rehabilitation inpatients were administered the FBTM, subsequently analyzed by item and factor analyses. Based on a second sample (n = 282) confirmatory factor analyses and validation of the questionnaire were executed. RESULTS: Item and factor analyses revealed a four factor structure. 24 items constituted the subscales that could be described as "intention to change", "wish for pension", "negative treatment expectations" and "active coping". Reliability (Cronbach's Alpha) was satisfactory with coefficients between 0.69 and 0.87, and only low correlations could be found between the four subscales. Correlations with other measures were most pronounced for the subscale "intention to change". Some significant but low correlations could be reported between the FBTM and a standardized questionnaire of psychotherapy motivation (FMP). Confirmatory factor analyses of a second sample (n = 282) confirmed the original four factors. First evidence of sensitivity could be observed in a sample of patients who took part in an intervention promoting work-related therapy motivation during psychosomatic inpatient rehabilitation. CONCLUSIONS: The FBTM is a reliable and valid instrument assessing work-related therapy motivation of inpatients, as a relevant therapeutic measure in psychosomatic rehabilitation. Further validation, especially the analysis of predictive validity is desirable.     

Outpatient rehabilitation of alcohol dependent patients in a day clinic: initial results of a comparative follow-up study of day clinic and inpatient treatment

This article describes the development of an outpatient concept for the day-clinic withdrawal treatment of alcohol dependent persons in a Hamburg institution for addiction aid. It reports the initial, selected results of a comparative follow-up study of patients discharged during the years 1998-2000, who either receive ambulatory treatment in the day clinic (n = 270) or inpatient treatment in the institution's special clinic (n = 462). Assessable questionnaires are available from 131 outpatients of the day-clinic treatment and 173 patients of the inpatient treatment form. The response rate - with reference to the group of those who were reachable - was 57.2 % for patients of the day clinic and 53.2 % for patients of the special clinic. The results of the study arrive at the conclusion that both treatment forms can be seen as thoroughly comparable with regard to primary outcome measurements (for example reduction of psychological stress, abstinence rates, reintegration into occupational life). Rehabilitants treated in the inpatient setting more frequently report that they had already contacted centres for further treatment and self-help groups during the rehabilitation phase, which however doesn't lead to a change of participation behaviour following the rehabilitation phase. This serves to confirm the assumption that an additional offer of a day-clinic service in the area of addiction rehabilitation provides a further, effective treatment concept that sensibly supplements the otherwise inpatient-oriented treatment landscape. The results indicate the quality of the work performed in the day clinic studied (as well as in the inpatient clinic) and should encourage the funding agencies and employees of other day clinic institutions in the field of addiction rehabilitation to participate in evaluation and quality assurance measures, thus continuing to bridge the gap between the (theoretical) state of knowledge concerning outpatient rehabilitation and the degree to which it can be successfully realized.     

Considerations for a "general model of psychosomatic rehabilitation" with departments for appropriate treatment intensity and required length of stay

Studies undertaken in the scientific area of general systems theory generally seek to elucidate central interrelationships. This paper its no exception in that it presents a "general model of psychosomatic rehabilitation". This new Y-shaped model was inspired firstly by the "general model of psychotherapy" and secondly by general systematic considerations on medical rehabilitation. It was first used to assess the progress of patients undergoing inpatient psychosomatic rehabilitation and to determine the relationship between treatment intensity and length of time-sensitive psychotherapy.     

Outpatient and inpatient orthopaedic rehabilitation--results of a study comparing outcome and costs

This article presents main results of a study comparing outcome and costs of various all-day outpatient and inpatient orthopaedic rehabilitation forms. The results were obtained within the scope of a comprehensive evaluation programme commissioned by the federation of health (VdAK) and pension insurance institutes (VDR). The purpose of this evaluation was to examine the quality of different types of various rehabilitation care. The outcome comparison comprises a longitudinal follow-up of various somatic, psychosocial und occupational reintegration parameters up to one year after rehabilitation as well as outcome assessments from the perspective of patients and physicians in rehabilitation centres and general practice. The costs are estimated on the basis of data from health and pension insurance funds. The results show extensive corresponding of results und assessments in the different forms of rehabilitation care for comparable patient groups. There are no indications of poorer care quality in outpatient rehabilitation, while economic analyses show better cost effectiveness in outpatient treatment by comparability of treatment, patients, and results. Results suggest that outpatient care, offered in the same quality as in the examined rehabilitation centres, is an alternative or complement to inpatient care at least for those patients, who can be treated in both the outpatient and inpatient setting.     

Motivation for in-patient psychotherapy among patients of a psychosomatic pain clinic

OBJECTIVE: For a number of pain patients inpatient psychotherapy is an adequate treatment. Many of these patients are lacking in motivation, though. The present study aimed at identifying factors associated with acceptance or rejection of inpatient psychotherapy. METHODS: 63 patients of a psychosomatic pain clinic underwent a multimodal assessment based on a psychosomatic interview as well as a set of psychodiagnostic questionnaires regarding sociodemographic factors, symptomatology (pain intensity, BSS, SCL-90-R, BDI), state of chronification, psychological defense mechanisms (DSQ) and biographic traumatisation (risk index). RESULTS: 71% of the patients were recommended in-patient psychotherapy. Among those, 63% accepted the recommendation, 27% rejected it. Among the patients who accepted in-patient psychotherapy, the extent of total psychological impairment as well as severity of depression and anxiety were more severe and the state of chronification tended to be less marked than in the rejecting group. Referring to sociodemographic variables, pain intensity,physical impairment and severity of biographic traumatisation,no significant difference between the groups could be shown. CONCLUSIONS: In our highly selected population the extent of psychiatric comorbidity and the state of chronification determined motivation for in-patient psychotherapy. Further studies should focus on unselected pain patients and on differences in motivation between various forms of psychotherapy.     

Inpatient psychosomatic rehabilitation for Turkish migrants: what can be realized, what are the effects?

A sample of 184 Turkish migrants who had been treated in a department for psychosomatic rehabilitation, were included in a study using retrospective analysis of their clinical documents. Somatoform disorders and depressions predominated among the main diagnoses but somatic diseases and risk factors were frequent as well. Because of insufficient outpatient treatment, diagnostic procedures concerning somatic state often became necessary during the rehabilitation measure, uncovering previously unknown somatic diseases in 16% of the patients. The main focus of the psychotherapy offered to the migrants had been slightly more on unburdening from suffering, also it included more psycho-educational elements, but apart from this the quality and quantity of treatment hardly differed from a sample of German patients. Hence, though based on higher efforts and costs, the psychosomatic rehabilitation offered to the Turkish migrants had been implemented according to current standards. An important effect of inpatient rehabilitation seems to have been the working out of an overall therapeutic concept comprising all psychic and somatic problems. The very poor results in social-medical respects found in the study have with increasing experience been considerably improved in the meantime.     

Physicians' preferences and expectations in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation--results of a case-based questionnaire survey

Purpose : Analysis of medical decisions in the differential allocation of traumatic brain injury (TBI) rehabilitation programmes.

Method : Medical specialists routinely involved in the treatment and rehabilitation of TBI patients from acute hospitals, rehabilitation centres, and the Medical Services of the Workers' Pension Insurance of Sachsen-Anhalt and Mecklenburg-Vorpommern were included in a systematic survey, in which they had to give their opinions on the individually optimal rehabilitation setting and therapies and probable outcome on the basis of case vignettes. These specialists are crucial for decision-making in rehabilitation resource allocation.

Results : Both allocation and prognosis depended mainly on patient characteristics. In a mixed logistic regression model, which takes into account that: (a) patient and physician characteristics may influence each other; and (b) that expert assessments might be correlated, setting preferences were related to chronicity and degree of motor and cognitive impairment, but also to the institutional background of the reviewer. Neuropsychological therapy dominated intervention recommendations, followed by physio- and occupational therapy. A comparatively great demand of psychotherapy and medicosocial assessment was recognized. Preferred rehabilitation setting did not influence the physicians' subjective prognosis. Older, chronic and motorically impaired patients were considered to profit less from rehabilitation. Physician characteristics and recommendations of either rehabilitation setting or therapies did not influence prognostic expectations.     

Short term results of outpatient vs. inpatient rehabilitation after stroke

Fifty stroke patients who had already regained basic ADL-functions were investigated at the beginning and end of either inpatient or outpatient rehabilitation of similar therapeutic intensity in the same institution. For geographic reasons, outpatient treatment could only be offered to a subgroup of patients. Neurological deficits, extended ADL-functions and quality of life (SF-36) were assessed. Patients who chose outpatient rehabilitation exhibited milder neurological deficits and better ADL-function at onset. On average, outpatient rehabilitation took about 8 days more than inpatient treatment. Under rehabilitation, gains with respect to ADL-functions and the QoL-dimensions "physical role function" and "physical functional ability" were realized. The magnitude of changes did not depend on setting. A decrease in "general health perception" may be related to the inpatient treatment of patients who would have preferred an outpatient setting. Brief periods between stroke and onset of rehabilitation and longer duration of rehabilitation treatment were significantly associated with better outcome with respect to ADL-functions.     

Relationship between duration of therapy services in a comprehensive rehabilitation program and mobility at discharge in patients with orthopedic problems

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between duration of physical therapy and occupational therapy and mobility at the time of discharge from a comprehensive rehabilitation program in a group of patients with orthopedic diagnoses. SUBJECTS: Subjects were 116 consecutive patients with orthopedic diagnoses (mean age=72.6 years, SD=12.0, range=21-99) who were admitted to a comprehensive inpatient rehabilitation program. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study utilized the Uniform Data Set, social service records, and quality assurance records to provide demographic and medical information. The Functional Independence Measure (FIM) provided information regarding mobility at admission and discharge. The duration of physical therapy and occupational therapy was measured in hours. RESULTS: Subjects received an average of 40.8 hours of therapy and showed an average change in FIM mobility subscale scores of 24.5. Multiple linear regression was used to demonstrate that duration of therapy was a predictor of FIM score at the time of discharge (partial correlation=.069) after controlling for length of stay, number of diagnoses, FIM cognitive subscale score at admission, and FIM mobility subscale score at admission. Duration of therapy accounted for 6.9% of the variance in the model. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: This study indicates that the amount of physical therapy and occupational therapy that patients with orthopedic diagnoses receive during enrollment in an inpatient comprehensive rehabilitation program is related to the FIM mobility subscale score at the time of discharge. The authors suggest that increasing the hours of therapeutic intervention that a patient receives in inpatient rehabilitation could improve functional outcomes at discharge.     

Psychology in medical rehabilitation

Integral cooperation of a clinical psychologist or psychotherapist in an internal medicine rehabilitation clinic is required because the presence of (contributory) psychic causes is evident beyond any doubt in numerous complaint syndromes. Regrettably, decision-making bodies frequently fail to acknowledge the necessity of competent psychological help. Various activities have developed as specific psychotherapeutic tasks, among them individual interviewing and above all group work (client-centered psychotherapy, staff-client meetings, health education, autogenic relaxation training, creativity therapy, biofeedback, and so on). Client-centered psychotherapy indications are outlined. Medical psychology, psychotherapy, and psychosomatic aspects of disease concepts must not be ignored if major concerns in medial rehabilitation and inpatient rehabilitative treatment programmes are to be dealt with effectively.     

Kardiologische Rehabilitation in Österreich. Eine Bedarfsanalyse

The aim of this analysis is to survey the general demand and current supply of cardiac rehabilitation in Austria on the basis of best evidence practice and to produce recommendations for a cost-effective structure of the entire cardiac rehabilitation system. Following the standards of indication of the Austrian Society of Cardiology an analysis of demand of cardiac rehabilitation has been carried out and juxtaposed with the current supply of facilities for cardiac rehabilitation. According to hospitalizations in the year 2000, 11,630 patients per annum would require inpatient phase II rehabilitation, 6,270 patients institutional based outpatient phase II rehabilitation and 14,319 patients institutional based phase III rehabilitation. In the year 2000, 14,746 patients received treatment in the 9 Austrian inpatient cardiac rehabilitation centres. This number is compared with an annual demand of 11,630 admissions for phase-II treatment. It follows that an equilibrium can be argued for the supply of and demand for inpatient cardiac rehabilitation in Austria. At present, 10 approved institutions in Austria offer outpatient cardiac rehabilitation services. The maximum number of positions for treatment per institution is currently 200-250. Consequently, maximally 2,000-2,500 patients per annum can be treated. In comparison, there exists a calculated demand for 6,270 patients in institutional based outpatient phase II rehabilitation and 14,319 patients in institutional based phase III rehabilitation. Altogether this amounts to a demand for 20,588 positions for treatment per annum. In Austria, the expenditures for inpatient phase II rehabilitation of a patient given an average duration of stay of 28 days, are [symbol: see text] 4,774.-. Presuming 100% compliance, the institutional based outpatient phase II rehabilitation program costs [symbol: see text] 2,760.- per patient. The costs for institutional based phase III rehabilitation services are [symbol: see text] 2,990.- per patient. This number is accompanied by a potential effective reduction of risks for the patients and a potential effective reduction of costs for the carrier as the number of rehospitalizations and recurrent procedures would decrease significantly. At present, the supply of cardiac rehabilitation in Austria is sufficient for inpatient phase II, but insufficient for the institutional based outpatient phase II and mainly phase III. Thus, a striking asymmetry exists between supply and demand. In view of the enduring effects of institutional based phase III rehabilitation, the individual and social use and finally the expected efficiency in terms of costs, this program should at least be offered without limits to all eligible patients.     

Evaluation of outpatient rehabilitation: goals,conceptual framework and study design of a health and pension insurance joint research project

In Germany the statutory health and pension insurance schemes are the main providers of medical rehabilitation, the majority of rehabilitation measures being given in an inpatient setting. Over the last few years, the health and pension insurance schemes have strengthened the extension of outpatient rehabilitation, and have funded a comprehensive evaluation study in this context. In this evaluation study outpatient rehabilitation in centres with different conceptual backgrounds is compared with inpatient rehabilitation in rehab clinics, indications considered being cardiology and orthopaedics. Overall, 14 rehab centres and more than 2000 patients were included in the project. The patients were interviewed and medically examined before and after the measure. A follow-up was done after six and twelve months. In addition to the rehabilitants themselves, the rehab centre physicians as well as the office-practice physicians were interviewed about the outcome of the rehab measure. One year after rehabilitation, data were collected from the relevant health and pension insurance funds concerning the benefits the patients had received. Due to the study's non-experimental design, validity of the results is confined to rehabilitants participating on an outpatient basis and who had been found medically suited for this type of rehabilitation, were capable of travelling to the rehab centre on their own within less than 45 minutes and had voluntarily opted for the outpatient setting. The findings of the study show that outpatient rehabilitants' motivation and expectations differ from those found in inpatient rehabilitation. The health economics analysis performed is restricted to the costs involved in the rehabilitation measure as such as well as the health-related benefits provided to the rehabilitants in the twelve-month study period. The issue of whether increasing outpatient rehab measures will lead to decreasing costs in the rehab system as a whole had not been considered in the framework of this project.     

Does a short period of rehabilitation in the home setting facilitate functioning after stroke? A randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of three weeks of rehabilitation in the home setting for younger patients with stroke with the aim of improving activity level. DESIGN: A randomized controlled study with blinded evaluations at discharge, three weeks, three months and one year after discharge. SETTING: Home of the patient or the ordinary day rehabilitation clinic at the university hospital. SUBJECTS: Fifty-eight patients (median age 53 years) consecutively discharged from inpatient rehabilitation with a first occurrence of stroke participated in training directly after discharge. Intervention: Rehabilitation was given for 9 hours/week over three weeks. The home group received individually tailored training, based on the patient's needs and desires, with a focus on activities in their natural context. Support and information were also given. The intervention in the day clinic group was aimed mainly at improved functions. MAIN MEASURES: The main outcome was activity, assessed with the Assessment of Motor and Process Skill (AMPS). The impairment level was also evaluated. Costs were estimated. RESULT: There were no significant differences between the groups on any of the four assessments. However, there seemed to be an earlier improvement on some measures (including AMPS) for the home group. For both groups there was a greater improvement on the activity level than on the impairment level. the costs of the home group were less than half of the costs of the day clinic group. CONCLUSION: With the present results, both rehabilitation programmes could be recommended, however, further studies are needed to define patients who may specifically benefit from the home rehabilitation programme. Costs should be taken into consideration.     

Effects of a programme for structured outpatient follow-up care after inpatient rehabilitation of obese children and adolescents--a multicentre, randomized study

INTRODUCTION: Inpatient rehabilitation is an important contributor to the treatment of child and adolescent obesity with comorbidity in Germany. Thus far outpatient follow-up care has not been subject to research. The main goal of this study is the development and longer-term evaluation of a programme for structured outpatient follow-up care by primary care physicians after inpatient rehabilitation of obese children and adolescents. METHODS: This multicentre, randomized, parallel controlled clinical trial enrolled 521 children and adolescents aged 9 - 16 (avg. 13.3) years in 7 cooperating specialized rehabilitation facilities. The patients were randomized at the end of their multimodal inpatient treatment that lasted for 5.9 (+/- 1.2) weeks. The intervention consisted of 12 half-hour outpatient consultations by the primary care physicians utilizing a modular consultation guideline and an internet-based training programme. The control group received standard care. Outcome variables included anthropometric measures, questionnaires on eating behaviour, physical activity, quality of life, self-efficacy and subjective rating of the intervention. Measurements were performed at the beginning (t1) and end (t2) of inpatient rehabilitation as well as 6 (t3) and 12 (t4) months after discharge. RESULTS: There was a highly significant improvement of BMI-z-score (standard deviation score of the Body Mass Index), relevant behaviour, quality of life and self-efficacy between t1 and t4. On intention to treat analysis no differences were detected between intervention and control groups. The intervention was utilized by only 50 % of entitled. The BMI-z-score reached a minimum at t3 (6-month follow-up). Predictors of longer-term BMI-z-score decline were psychological suffering, poor eating behaviour, low physical activity and high socio-economic status. In multivariate linear regression improvement of eating behaviour and physical activity correlated with the improvement of BMI-z-score. DISCUSSION: This low-level outpatient intervention did not improve the demonstrated longer-term effectiveness of inpatient rehabilitation. An interdisciplinary outpatient follow-up care in groups with inclusion of the parents is recommended.     

Inpatient rehabilitation of patients requiring hemodialysis

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes of patients who require hemodialysis and are admitted to an inpatient rehabilitation unit. DESIGN: Retrospective review of the data of all admissions to an inpatient rehabilitation unit in 2001. SETTING: University medical center. PARTICIPANTS: All inpatient rehabilitation admissions in 2001 (N=531), including 497 patients who did not require hemodialysis and 34 who required hemodialysis. INTERVENTION: A comprehensive rehabilitation program including physical therapy and occupational therapy. Speech and language therapy and rehabilitation psychology were provided when necessary. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Length of stay (LOS), change in total score on the FIM instrument, FIM efficiency, and place of discharge. RESULTS: Admission and discharge FIM scores of the patients requiring hemodialysis were virtually identical to those of the other patients admitted to the unit. The average LOS of the hemodialysis patients was 5.4 days longer than that of the other patients, and, therefore, efficiency scores of the dialysis group were less than those of the other patients. The rate of discharge to the community did not differ significantly for the dialysis group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who require hemodialysis can benefit from rehabilitation services. Their improvement on the FIM instrument is comparable to that of other patients, but their LOS may be longer than that of other patients.     

Occupational categories and return to work after traumatic brain injury: a multicenter study

OBJECTIVE: To further evaluate determinants of return to work (RTW) after traumatic brain injury (TBI), with focus on the relation between preinjury occupational category and RTW outcome. DESIGN: Prospective collaborative cohort study. SETTING: Seventeen National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research-designated Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive sample of 1341 patients (age range, 18-62y) who were hospitalized with a TBI diagnosis, received both acute neurotrauma services and inpatient rehabilitation services, consented to participate, were employed before injury, and completed a 1-year follow-up assessment. INTERVENTION: An inpatient interdisciplinary brain injury rehabilitation program. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Competitive employment at 1 year postinjury. RESULTS: Participants were categorized into 1 of 3 groups depending on preinjury occupational title: professional/managerial (n=192), skilled (n=751), or manual labor (n=398). Chi-square analyses were computed to examine changes across occupation groups between preinjury occupation group and postinjury RTW. The rate of successful RTW was greatest for professional/managerial (56%), lower for skilled (40%), and lowest for manual labor (32%), yielding an odds ratio of 2.959 between the highest and lowest groups. Of those with successful RTW, most did so within the same occupational category grouping. A multiple logistic regression showed that preinjury occupation, education level, discharge FIM score, age, sex, marital status, and hospital length of stay each influenced RTW. CONCLUSIONS: Prior research has shown that preinjury employment status (employed vs unemployed) greatly influences the odds of successful RTW after TBI. A related hypothesis, that occupational classification also influences RTW outcome, has been understudied and has yielded conflicting results. The current study shows convincingly that the type of occupation influences RTW outcome, with the best prospect for RTW among people with professional/managerial jobs. Occupational category should be examined in the future development of predictive models for RTW after TBI.