股骨大转子延长截骨在假体稳定股骨柄翻修中的应用

目的 评估大转子延长截骨在股骨假体固定稳定型全髋关节翻修术中应用的中期临床效果.方法 1998年1月至2005年6月对27例患者(27髋)采用大转子延长截骨对股骨柄和(或)骨水泥壳固定稳定的全髋关节翻修.临床随访评估包括Harris评分和WOMAC评分,术前Harris评分平均42.7分,WOMAC评分平均55.6分;影像学评估包括术后拍摄X线片,对比观察截骨块愈合时间、是否存在截骨延迟愈合或不愈合,截骨块是否发生移位以及假体是否下沉等.结果 共19例患者(19髋)获得随访,平均随访时间5.3年.无一例发生术中或术后骨折.术后Harris评分平均87.3分,WOMAC评分平均46.3分.所有患者大转子截骨块均于术后6个月内愈合.无股骨大转子截骨块向近端移位,3例发生股骨柄下沉,平均下沉3.4 mm,无钢丝断裂.结论 对于假体固定稳定型股骨柄翻修,采用股骨大转子延长截骨有利于手术操作和翻修假体的植入和固定,有利于截骨块的愈合,降低术中、术后并发症发生率,中期疗效显著.     

Trochanteric osteotomy and fixation during total hip arthroplasty

Once used routinely, trochanteric osteotomy in total hip arthroplasty now is usually limited to difficult primary and revision cases. There are three types: the standard trochanteric osteotomy and its variations, the trochanteric slide, and the extended trochanteric osteotomy. Each has unique indications, fixation techniques, and complications. Primary total hip arthroplasty procedures requiring the enhanced exposure provided by trochanteric osteotomy may be needed in patients with hip ankylosis or fusion, protrusio acetabuli, proximal femoral deformities, developmental dysplasia, or abductor muscle laxity. Trochanteric osteotomies in revision arthroplasties, primarily the extended trochanteric osteotomy, facilitate the removal of well-fixed femoral components, provide direct access to the diaphysis for distal fixation, and enhance acetabular exposure.     

Transtrochanteric approach to the hip

Once routinely used, trochanteric osteotomy in total hip arthroplasty now is usually limited to difficult primary and revision cases. Many variations of the osteotomy and many various techniques for the trochanter reattachment have been described. Our specific surgical technique is presented as well as its advantages and drawbacks. Primary total hip arthroplasty procedures requiring the enhanced exposure provided by trochanteric osteotomy is needed in patients with hip ankylosis or fusion, protrusio acetabuli, proximal femoral deformities, developmental dysplasia, or abductor muscle laxity. Trochanteric osteotomy, in revision arthroplasties, facilitates the removal of well-fixed femoral components and enhance acetabular exposure. In all cases trochanteric osteotomy remains useful to preserve the periarticular muscles and restore the geometry of the artificial hip which are the best ways to prevent dislocation.     

Extended trochanteric osteotomy in complex primary total hip arthroplasty. A brief note

BACKGROUND: The extended trochanteric osteotomy has been a useful approach for patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty; however, it has not been well described as an approach for those undergoing complex primary total hip arthroplasty. The purpose of the present report is to describe our experience with the use of an extended trochanteric osteotomy for patients undergoing complex primary total hip arthroplasty. METHODS: Six patients underwent primary total hip arthroplasty with use of an extended trochanteric osteotomy. The reasons for the use of this technique included severe femoral deformity, removal of intraosseous hardware, and high-riding developmental hip dysplasia. A fully porous-coated femoral component with diaphyseal fixation was used for all reconstructions. The mean age of the patients at the time of surgery was fifty-six years. Clinical and radiographic evaluation was performed at a minimum of two years. RESULTS: After a mean duration of follow-up of fifty months, all patients had an osseointegrated, stable femoral component. The site of the extended trochanteric osteotomy healed in five of the six patients. One patient had nonunion at the osteotomy site and a fracture at the base of the greater trochanter, with a subsequent fracture of the femoral component. The mean Merle D'Aubigné and Postel pain and walking scores improved from 2.2 and 2.3 preoperatively to 5.3 and 4.7 at the time of the final follow-up (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The extended trochanteric osteotomy is useful for the correction of femoral deformity and facilitates the removal of intraosseous hardware in carefully selected patients undergoing complex primary total hip arthroplasty.     

大转子延长截骨在全髋关节翻修术中应用的临床评价

目的 回顾性研究采用大转子延长截骨(extended troehanteric osteotomy,ETO)行全髋关节翻修术后股骨柄的位置变化,评价ETO在股骨假体稳定件髋关节翻修术中的作用.方法 1998年1月至2007年6月,采用ETO对股骨柄或骨水泥壳固定稳定性全髋关节33例33髋进行翻修.翻修术后采用Harris评分和MOMAC评分评估髋关节功能,摄动态X线片观察截骨块愈合、假体位置改变及股骨柄与股骨髓腔匹配等情况.结果 25例随访12～103个月,平均63个月.Harris评分由术前平均38.4分,提高到末次随访时88.7分;WOMAC评分由术前平均56.2分,降至末次随访时42.8分.大转子截骨块均在术后4～10个月骨性愈合.3例发生股骨柄下沉.平均3.4mm.股骨柄假体出现外翻、内翻各1例.无术中或术后骨折、钢丝断裂、感染、假体周围骨溶解以及异位骨化发生.术后关节脱位1例.结论 对假体固定稳定性股骨柄进行翻修,采用ETO有利于假体的安全取出,术后截骨块愈合率高,延长截骨不影响假体稳定性.股骨柄下沉、位置改变、截骨块骨折等并发症发生率低.     

Chronically unreduced traumatic anterior dislocation of the hip: a report of four cases.

Four cases of unreduced (2-11 months postinjury) anterior hip dislocation are reported. One public dislocation 2 months postinjury was treated by open reduction with a fair result. A unique case of iliac dislocation 11 months postinjury, overlooked due to an associated femoral shaft fracture, was treated by valgus/derotation osteotomy. Two obturator dislocations 7.5 and 9.5 months postinjury were treated by a subcapital osteotomy and displacement of the femoral neck into the acetabulum (modified excision arthroplasty). Both of these patients had fairly stable, painless, and mobile hips at 2.1 and 2.8 years follow-up. By our method, subsequent total hip arthroplasty remains a viable option, in contrast to the previously described method of trochanteric osteotomy, whereby the proximal femoral anatomy is distorted.     

Survivorship and Radiological Analysis of a Monoblock,Hydroxyapatite-Coated Titanium Stem in Revision Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundWe evaluated the survivorship, incidence of complications, radiological subsidence, proximal stress shielding, and patient-reported outcomes of a conservative, monoblock, hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stem.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study reports on 254 revision hip arthroplasties between January 2006 and June 2016. The mean age of patients was 71 years. The mean length of follow-up was 62 months (range 12-152).ResultsThere were 13 stem re-revisions: infection (4), periprosthetic fracture (4), aseptic stem loosening (3), stem fracture (1), and extended trochanteric osteotomy nonunion (1). Kaplan-Meier aseptic stem survivorship was 97.33% (confidence interval 94-100) at 6 years. There were 29 intraoperative fractures. There were 6 cases of subsidence greater than 10 mm; however, none required revision. Ninety-six percent of cases showed no proximal stress shielding. Thigh pain was reported in 3% of cases.ConclusionThis study confirms that this stem provides good survivorship at 6 years, acceptable complication rates, adequate proximal bone loading, low incidences of thigh pain, and reliable clinical performance in revision hip arthroplasty.Key MessageA monoblock, fully hydroxyapatite-coated titanium stem is reliable in revision arthroplasty with mild-moderate femur deficiencies.     

Osteotomien des Trochanter major

The increasing number of total hip arthroplasty procedures lead to an increasing number of revision surgeries. The trochanteric osteotomy technique is an established procedure in selected cases with the necessity of extending the usual surgical approach. Trochanteric osteotomy is also successfully performed in other areas, such as trauma surgery and joint-preserving surgery (surgical dislocation). Several techniques for trochanteric osteotomy are availably employing various fixation techniques and implants. This article presents the most common trochanteric osteotomy techniques for extension of the surgical approach (the classical according to Charnley, the trochanter slide, the extended trochanteric, and the stepped osteotomy) as well as clinical results and biomechanical experiences.     

Revision total hip replacement without trochanteric osteotomy

Revision total hip replacement has traditionally required a trochanteric osteotomy for successful cement removal and component reinsertion. In this study the authors have concluded that in most instances the revision total hip replacement procedure can be successfully performed without trochanteric osteotomy. The advantages are underscored by the high percentage of trochanteric complications with trochanteric osteotomy for revision total hip replacement and the ease of rehabilitation without trochanteric osteotomy. Also, improved functional results without trochanteric osteotomy were noted. The specific indications for the procedure included revision total hip replacement with ununited prior trochanteric osteotomy, revision total hip replacement with femoral shaft fractures, and revision total hip replacement with stem fractures requiring only acetabular revision. The contraindications to the procedure are fibrous union or ununited trochanteric osteotomy from prior total hip replacement, severe acetabular protrusion of the acetabular component, advanced myositis ossificans, ankylosis of the hip, and advanced proximal femoral osteoporosis. The operating room records, x-rays, and outpatient records of 63 total hip revisions in 52 patients were reviewed. There was a minimum 2-year follow up with a range from two years to seven years. The patients were divided into two groups, comparing 21 trochanteric osteotomized revisions to 44 with trochanteric sparing techniques. Both groups were analyzed for age, type of implant, intraoperative perforation of femur, intraoperative femoral shaft fractures, intraoperative cortical window, component malpositioning extraneous cement, intraoperative blood loss, operating time, postoperative leg length inequality, persistent abductor weakness, average first day of ambulation, wound infection, dislocation, nonunion of the trochanter, and postoperative pain. In the nonosteotomized group, there was a 21% decreased blood loss, a 14% decrease in persistent abductor weakness, a 14% decrease in subluxation and dislocation, a 30% decrease operating time and a 50% reduction in intraoperative femoral perforation. In the osteotomized group there were six cases of fibrous union of the greater trochanter, two cases requiring removal of broken wires for trochanteric bursitis. A detailed surgical technique and representative cases are presented. In carefully selected cases, revision total hip replacement is optimally performed without trochanteric osteotomy. Postoperative trochanteric problems of nonunion, broken wires, bursitis, and abductor weakness can effectively be eliminated by avoiding trochanteric osteotomy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Combined vertical and horizontal cable fixation of an extended trochanteric osteotomy site

BACKGROUND: The use of an extended trochanteric osteotomy facilitates exposure and aids in the removal of a well-fixed femoral implant and cement during revision total hip arthroplasty. Occasionally, nonunion, fracture, and trochanteric migration have been reported following osteotomy. We evaluated the rate of healing of the osteotomy site and of implant stability when fixation was accomplished with use of vertical trochanteric and horizontal metaphyseal cable fixation (combined cable fixation). METHODS: The clinical and radiographic results of revision total hip arthroplasty with use of an extended trochanteric osteotomy followed by implantation of a distally porous-coated component and combined cable fixation of the osteotomy site in forty-two consecutive patients (forty-three hips) were reviewed. Intraoperative fracture at the osteotomy site occurred in five hips (12%). RESULTS: All osteotomy sites healed by six months, with an average time to union of fifteen weeks. One implant subsided 5 mm in a patient in whom a fracture had occurred at the time of the osteotomy. No trochanteric migration occurred. Two patients required a reoperation: one because of instability, and another because of recurrent infection. CONCLUSIONS: The extended trochanteric osteotomy facilitates revision of a well-fixed femoral component. Despite occasional intraoperative fracture at the osteotomy site, combined vertical trochanteric and horizontal metaphyseal cable fixation resulted in an excellent rate of healing and implant stability.     

Component removal in revision total hip arthroplasty.

One of the primary steps in revision hip arthroplasty is the extraction of retained components before surgical reconstruction. In revision arthroplasty, the removal of well-fixed components and cement can be extremely demanding, time consuming, and damaging to the remaining host bone. The aims of the current study were to examine the numerous operative techniques used during extraction of acetabular and femoral components and review the results of revision hip arthroplasty after cementless component removal. A review of 157 acetabular components and 113 femoral components removed from 219 patients during hip revision arthroplasty between 1985 and 2000 was done. The average age of the patients was 64.3 years. The average followup was 5 years (range, 0.7-12.5 years). An extended proximal femoral osteotomy was done in 37 (33%) of the femoral revisions. There were 14 (5%) acetabular failures for which the patients required reoperation. There were no femoral rerevisions. Complications included dislocation (6% after acetabular revision and 9% after femoral revision), infection (6%), femoral fracture (6%), hematoma (3.5%), acetabular fixation failure (2.5%), and femoral osteolysis (1%). The removal of cemented and well-fixed porous-coated implants can be done with adequate preoperative planning and a thorough knowledge of numerous implant removal techniques.     

Subtrochanteric femoral shortening osteotomy in total hip arthroplasty for high-riding developmental dislocation of the hip

A surgical technique, which uses a transverse osteotomy, for subtrochanteric femoral shortening and derotation in total hip arthroplasty for high-riding developmental dislocation of the hip is described. Anteversion is set by rotating the osteotomy fragments, and torsional stability is augmented with allograft struts and cables when indicated. Eight patients with 9 total hip arthroplasties were followed for an average of 43 months (range, 24–84 months). Good to excellent results were obtained in 87% of patients (7 of 8). Eight of 9 osteotomies (89%) demonstrated radiographic evidence of healing at an average of 5 months. One patient had an asymptomatic nonunion of the osteotomy site but still had a good overall clinical result. Another patient suffered fatigue failure of a distally ingrown porous device, which necessitated revision total hip arthroplasty 18 months after surgery. Subtrochanteric osteotomy in total hip arthroplasty for developmental dislocation of the hip allows for acetabular exposure and diaphyseal shortening while facilitating femoral derotation. Furthermore, proximal femoral bone stock is maintained and some of the potential complications of greater trochanteric osteotomy may be avoided.     

Proximal femoral osteotomy as an adjunct in cementless revision total hip arthroplasty

Cementless total hip replacement techniques are increasingly used in revision arthroplasty. A major challenge is to achieve implant stability in a femur distorted by a failed arthroplasty. Five patients with aseptic loosening of cemented primary or revision total hip replacements complicated by significant proximal femoral disease, four with marked angular deformity of the femur and one with a subtrochanteric nonunion, were treated successfully with cementless revision arthroplasty combined with proximal femoral osteotomy. At follow-up examination, all femoral and trochanteric osteotomies had healed and D'Aubigne and Postel scores for pain, function, and range of motion had improved. All porous prostheses demonstrated radiographic features consistent with bone ingrowth fixation. No progressive stress shielding has been observed. Concomitant femoral osteotomy to correct anatomic deformity, in association with cementless total hip arthroplasty, results in union of the osteotomy and restoration of hip function.     

Previous Bernese periacetabular osteotomy does not compromise the results of total hip arthroplasty

It is not known if a previous periacetabular osteotomy poses technical difficulties and may increase the incidence of complications after total hip arthroplasty. The records of 41 patients who had THA after periacetabular osteotomy were evaluated. Followup averaged 6.9 years (range, 2-14 years). The average interval from osteotomy to total hip arthroplasty was 6.3 years (range, 4 months-14 years). Total hip arthroplasty provided significant relief of pain and improvement in function for all the patients. The acetabulum was judged to be retroverted in 23 patients and special attention to component positioning was needed. An abnormal proximal femoral anatomy secondary to previous intertrochanteric osteotomy or underlying dysplasia, or trochanteric overgrowth necessitated the use of trochanteric osteotomy for exposure in 24 patients. There were an acceptable number of complications and two revisions in the series. Aseptic loosening of the femoral component in one patient (one hip) and acetabular component in another patient (one hip) were the reasons for the two revisions. Total hip arthroplasty with technical consideration and careful evaluation of the acetabular version and relocated teardrop can be done safely in patients with a previous periacetabular osteotomy and should provide excellent results.     

Total hip arthroplasty in patients 80 years of age and older.

One hundred fifty-seven consecutive patients (162 total hip arthroplasties) 80 years of age and older were observed for one year after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Clinical results and complications were recorded. The indication for surgery was degenerative joint disease (DJD) in one half of the patients and complications to proximal femoral fractures in the other half. The mean age was 83 years old in both groups. In 80% of the patients, no complications were recorded during the first year. Three patients died during the first three months. Two deep infections occurred (1.2%). The dislocation rate was 9.2% (15/162). There was a lower dislocation rate (4/84) in the DJD group compared to the fracture group (11/78). All nine recurrent dislocations occurred in the fracture group and were treated with either trochanteric osteotomy (five) or removal of the prosthesis (four). In the patients operated on with trochanteric osteotomy, no further dislocations occurred. The mean hospital stay was 13 days. After one year, 88% (112/127) of the patients who could be observed had good or excellent results. Total hip arthroplasty in the elderly is a reasonably safe method and yields good functional results. Dislocations, however, were common in patients operated on for complications from proximal femoral fractures, and the risk for recurrent dislocation was high (9/11). In these patients, trochanteric osteotomy is recommended.     

Implant stability in revision total hip arthroplasty: Allograft bone packing following extended proximal femoral osteotomy

One method of revising the femoral component in revision total hip arthroplasty in the presence of compromised femoral bone stock is to pack the upper femur with particulate allograft and then to cement the femoral component into the allograft bed. This technique is being used clinically with encouraging results. Additionally, surgical exposure of the femoral canal during revision total hip arthroplasty can be greatly improved with an extended trochanteric osteotomy, which is subsequently repaired with wires or cables. To assess the feasibility of performing the allograft bone packing technique following an extended trochanteric osteotomy, the stability of this construct in a cadaver model was measured, using micromotion sensing instruments and loads applied on a materials testing machine. The stability of the cemented allograft impaction construct following extended trochanteric osteotomy was comparable to the stability of the control construct, which consisted of a similar impacted allograft construct without osteotomy. The stability of the osteotomized side was comparable to that of the control side. It is concluded that the initial in vitro stability of the allograft impaction technique following extended proximal femoral osteotomy is adequate to justify experimental in vivo use.     

股骨转子下叠加缩短截骨在CroweⅣ型成人髋脱位全髋置换术的应用

目的总结CroweⅣ型成人髋脱位采用股骨转子下叠加缩短截骨行全髋置换术的方法与疗效。方法2000年1月至2003年12月，收治8例（11髋）CroweⅣ型成人髋脱位患者，男3例，女5例；年龄40-57岁，平均48岁；单髋5例，双髋3例；先天性发育不良7例，陈旧性髋关节结核1例。假体臼杯为金属杯＋聚乙烯内衬设计，其中Duraloc（Depuy，Warsaw，USA）8髋，Pressfit SⅡ（LINK，Ger-many）3髋。股骨柄假体采用AML（Depuy，Warsaw，USA）4髋，Summit（Depuy，Warsaw，USA）4髋，Ribbed（LINK，Germany）3髋。假体均采用生物学固定。手术均采用股骨转子下叠加缩短截骨，并附加断端“V”形截骨，其中6髋因最小号股骨柄假体置 入困难，而附加股骨劈开成形术。结果无一例发生感染、脱位等并发症，无一例行臀大肌或臀中、小肌等短肌松解。转子下平均缩短截骨长度为4．5cm（4～6cm），无一例因截骨过短，导致股骨头假体复位困难或坐骨神经牵伸伤；也无一例因截骨过长，导致股骨头假体松弛性脱位。术后X线片示臼杯均位于真臼区，股骨柄假体的初始固定均优良，截骨断端在3～6个月后均骨性愈合。测量显示患肢平均延长3cm（2．5～3．5cm）。随访3～7年，髋关节Harris评分从术前的25～32分改善至1年后的90～98分。无一髋假体显示有X线松动和邻近骨溶解。结论股骨转子下叠加缩短截骨术可用于CroweⅣ型成人髋脱位的全髋置换术治疗。     

扩展型转子截骨技术在骨水泥型股骨柄翻修中的临床应用

目的探讨扩展型转子截骨技术在较困难的骨水泥型股骨柄翻修手术中的作用和临床效果。方法2002年2月至2006年5月采用扩展型转子截骨翻修股骨侧假体12例，应用扩展型转子截骨技术取出所有骨水泥和假体柄，重新植入翻修用假体柄，以多道金属线缆环扎固定。其中1例选择的是骨水泥股骨假体，11例是非骨水泥股骨假体。结果所有患者均获得随访，时间16～24个月，术后6个月所有截骨处均愈合，无大转子移位。Harris评分由术前平均（48．4±7．5）分上升至术后平均（89．3±8．1）分（为术后1年的评分），假体无松动、下沉、假体周围未见骨吸收、骨溶解。结论扩展型转子截骨对骨水泥取出困难的股骨侧翻修术具有骨水泥取除彻底，安全可靠，手术时间短，并发症少的优点。     

Outcomes and Risk Factors of Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy in Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review

BackgroundAlthough extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO) is an effective technique for femoral stem removal and for the concomitant management of proximal femoral deformities, complications including persistent pain, trochanteric nonunion, and painful hardware can occur.MethodsThe US National Library of Medicine (PubMed/MEDLINE) and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were queried for publications utilizing the following keywords: “extended” AND “trochanteric” AND “osteotomy.”ResultsNineteen articles were included in the present study with 1478 ETOs. The mean overall union rate of the ETO was 93.1% (1377 of 1478 cases), while the overall rate of radiographic femoral stem subsidence >5 mm was 7.1% (25 of 350 cases). ETO union rates and femoral stem subsidence rates were similar between patients with periprosthetic fractures treated with total hip arthroplasty (THA) revision and ETO and patients treated with THA revision and ETO for reasons other than fractures. There was limited evidence that prior femoral cementation and older age might negatively influence ETO union rates.ConclusionThere was moderate quality evidence to show that the use of ETO in aseptic patients undergoing single-stage revision THA is safe and effective, with a 7% rate of ETO nonunion and subsidence >5 mm in 7%. ETO can be safely used in cases with periprosthetic fractures in which stem fixation is jeopardized and a reimplantation is required. A well-conducted ETO should be preferred in selective THA revision cases to prevent intraoperative femoral fractures which are associated with deteriorated clinical outcomes. The use of trochanteric plate with cables should be considered as the first choice for ETO fixation.     

Optimal fixation for the extended trochanteric osteotomy: a pilot study comparing 3 cables vs 2 cables

The extended femoral trochanteric osteotomy allows excellent exposure of the proximal femoral canal, which facilitates resection of the canal's contents during revision total hip arthroplasty. Once the proximal femoral canal has been evacuated and a new femoral component has been placed, the osteotomy should be fixed in proper position to allow healing. The purpose of our study was to compare the fixation of an extended trochanteric osteotomy using 2 vs 3 braided cables with regard to stiffness, peak force, axial displacement, transverse displacement, and angular displacement using an in vitro biomechanical model. Nine paired cadaver femurs were loaded to failure. Movement at the osteotomy site before failure was recorded using a motion analysis system. There was no statistically significant difference between 2 vs 3 cables with regard to stiffness, peak force, or displacement in the 3 planes tested. Peak force and stiffness were both greater in the 3-cable group, whereas angular and transverse displacement were less in the 2-cable construct.