Allosensitization does not increase the risk of xenoreactivity to alpha1,3-galactosyltransferase gene-knockout miniature swine in patients on transplantation waiting lists

BACKGROUND: The recent availability of alpha1,3-galactosyltransferase knockout (GalT-KO) miniature swine has eliminated anti-Gal antibodies as the major barrier to xenotransplantation, potentially bringing this modality closer to clinical application. Highly-allosensitized patients, who have poor prospects of receiving a suitable cross-match negative human organ, might be the first patients to benefit from xenotransplantation of porcine organs. However, concerns exist regarding cross-reactivity of alloreactive anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies against xenogeneic swine leukocyte antigen (SLA) antigens. We have investigated this question using sera from such patients on GalT-KO target cells. METHODS: Using flow cytometry and complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) assays, we have tested a panel of 88 human serum samples from patients awaiting cadaveric renal allotransplantation for reactivity against: 1) human; 2) standard miniature swine; and 3) GalT-KO peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) and cultured endothelial cells. RESULTS: Anti-swine IgM and IgG antibody binding, as well as CDC, were significantly attenuated on GalT-KO versus standard swine. No correlation was found between the degree of anti-human panel reactive antibodies (PRA) and xenoreactivity against either standard or GalT-KO miniature swine. Treatment of sera with dithiothreitol (DTT) showed that the majority of remaining lymphocytotoxicity against GalT-KO swine was mediated by preformed IgM antibodies. Patients with high alloreactivity but low anti-GalT-KO xenoreactivity were readily identified. CONCLUSIONS: Highly allosensitized patients awaiting renal transplants appear to be at no increased risk of xenosensitization over their non-sensitized cohorts, and could therefore be candidates for xenotransplantation using GalT-KO swine donors.     

Comparison of allogeneic and xenogeneic in vitro T-cell proliferative responses in sensitized patients awaiting kidney transplantation

Highly sensitized patients awaiting kidney transplantation may be potential candidates for future clinical trials using pig organ donors. Because of crossreactivity between human leucocyte antigens (HLA) and swine leucocyte antigens (SLA), such patients might have heightened T-cell responses to porcine xenoantigens. We determined whether lymphocytes from allo-sensitized patients displayed secondary (cyclosporine resistant) T-cell proliferative responses against porcine xenoantigens. Lymphocytes from six non-sensitized, seven sensitized [immunoglobulin G (IgG) panel reactive antibodies (PRA) 11 to 84%], 14 highly sensitized patients (IgG PRA > 84%) and 12 healthy individuals were tested [in the presence and absence of Cyclosporin A (CsA)] to determine their proliferative response to human (allogeneic) and to porcine (xenogeneic) stimulator cells. Lymphocytes from all study groups showed a strong proliferative response to allogeneic and xenogeneic stimulator cells with no significant difference between non-sensitized and sensitized individuals. Addition of CsA (100 and 500 ng/ml) inhibited (>90%) proliferation of lymphocytes from all non-sensitized patients to both allogeneic and xenogeneic stimulators. CsA was less effective at inhibiting proliferation of lymphocytes from sensitized patients and highly sensitized patients to allogeneic stimulators [29% (n=21) and 50% (n=42) respectively were resistant to CsA inhibition (100 ng/ml)]. In contrast, cyclosporine inhibited proliferation of lymphocytes from the majority of sensitized and highly sensitized patients to xenogeneic stimulator cells [14% (n=21) and 14% (n=42) respectively were resistant to CsA inhibition (100 ng/ml)]. HLA sensitized patients awaiting renal transplantation display cyclosporine resistant proliferative T-cell responses to allogeneic stimulators but proliferative responses to xenogeneic stimulators are more amenable to suppression by CsA. This finding suggests that humoral sensitisation to HLA antigens is not necessarily indicative of a heightened in vitro T-cell response to SLA antigens.     

Flow cytometric detection of HLA-specific antibodies as a predictor of heart allograft rejection

BACKGROUND: Historically, panel reactive antibody (PRA) analysis to detect HLA antibodies has been performed using cell-based complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) techniques. Recently, a flow cytometric procedure (FlowPRA) was introduced as an alternative approach to detect HLA antibodies. The flow methodology, using a solid phase matrix to which soluble HLA class I or class II antigens are attached is significantly more sensitive than CDC assays. However, the clinical relevance of antibodies detected exclusively by FlowPRAhas not been established. In this study of cardiac allograft recipients, FlowPRA was performed on pretransplant sera with no detectable PRA activity as assessed by CDC assays. FlowPRA antibody activity was then correlated with clinical outcome. METHODS: PRA analysis by anti-human globulin enhanced (AHG) CDC and FlowPRA was performed on sera corresponding to final cross-match specimens from 219 cardiac allograft recipients. In addition, sera collected 3-6 months posttransplant from 91 patients were evaluated. The presence or absence of antibodies was correlated with episodes of rejection and patient survival. A rejection episode was considered to have occurred based on treatment with antirejection medication and/or histology. RESULTS: By CDC, 12 patients (5.5%) had pretransplant PRA >10%. In contrast, 72 patients (32.9%) had pretransplant anti-HLA antibodies detectable by FlowPRA (34 patients with only class I antibodies; 7 patients with only class II antibodies; 31 patients with both class I and class II antibodies). A highly significant association (P<0.001) was observed between pretransplant HLA antibodies detected by FlowPRA and episodes of rejection that occurred during the first posttransplant year. Fifteen patients died within the first year posttransplant. Of nine retrospective flow cytometric cross-matches that were performed, two were in recipients who had no pretransplant antibodies detectable by FlowPRA. Both of these cross-matches were negative. In contrast, five of seven cross-matches were positive among recipients who had FlowPRA detectable pretransplant antibodies. Posttransplant serum specimens from 91 patients were also assessed for antibodies by FlowPRA. Among this group, 58 patients had FlowPRA antibodies and there was a trend (although not statistically significant) for a biopsy documented episode of rejection to have occurred among patients with these antibodies. CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, our data suggest that pre- and posttransplant HLA antibodies detectable by FlowPRA and not AHG-CDC identify cardiac allograft recipients at risk for rejection. Furthermore, a positive donor reactive flow cytometric cross-match is significantly associated with graft loss. Thus, we believe that detection and identification of HLA-specific antibodies can be used to stratify patients into high and low risk categories. An important observation of this study is that in the majority of donor:recipient pairs, pretransplant HLA antibodies were not directed against donor antigens. We speculate that these non-donor-directed antibodies are surrogate markers that correspond to previous T cell activation. Thus, the rejection episodes that occur in these patients are in response to donor-derived MHC peptides that share cryptic determinants with the HLA antigens that initially sensitized the patient.     

Autoreactive lymphocytotoxic IgM antibodies in highly sensitized dialysis patients waiting for a kidney transplant: identification and clinical relevance

The contribution of different families of lymphocytotoxic antibodies in the serologic reactivity of 45 highly sensitized dialysis patients (HSDP) (panel reactivity antibody value-PRA greater than 80%) was assessed by analyzing patients' sera for the presence of auto- and alloreactive IgM and alloreactive IgG antibodies. A total of 220 sera was screened at different incubation temperatures, before and after treatment with the reducing agent dithiothreitol, against a large variety of cell targets by means of complement dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) and antiglobulin augmented (AHG) CDC assays. The results allowed to subdivide the HSDP under study into four groups: Group 1 consisted of 13 untransplanted patients and 14 patients with a prior failed graft whose PRA values did not change following DTT treatment. Alloreactive IgG antibodies alone, with anti-HLA specificity, were present in the sera of this patient group. Group 2 consisted of 3 untransplanted patients whose sera did not contain any autolymphocytotoxic antibody but appeared completely unreactive to panel lymphocytes following DTT treatment, thus confirming the presence of alloreactive IgM only endowed with antiHLA reactivity. Group 3 consisted of 4 untransplanted and 4 patients with a prior failed graft whose sera were found to contain in addition to autoreactive IgM also alloreactive IgG antibodies. Their PRA values declined after DTT treatment on average from 96.2% to 45% and from 95% to 52.5%, respectively. Group 4 consisted of 6 untransplanted patients whose PRA reactivity to both autologous and panel lymphocytes completely disappeared following DTT treatment, thus indicating that their sera contained exclusively autolymphocytotoxic IgM antibodies.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Immunoadsorption of anti-HLA antibodies for highly sensitized patients awaiting renal transplantation.

Fifteen end-stage renal disease patients with high titres of panel reactive (PRA) antibodies were treated with immunoadsorption (IA) on sepharose-bound protein A columns in order to remove anti-HLA antibodies and facilitate transplantation. Infectious complications were not observed after IA and transplantation, and the procedure was well tolerated. In spite of the use of adjunctive immunosuppressive treatment with cyclophosphamide and prednisolone, this method produced only variable effects in lowering panel reaction antibodies, and was hampered by high de novo resynthesis of anti-HLA antibodies. Patients whose pre-IA antibody titre was greater than or equal to 1:64 clearly did not benefit from the procedure, but other immunological criteria were not predictive of efficacy. Twelve patients were transplanted on the basis of a negative cross-match with current serum, historical sera being retrospectively tested. Surprisingly, seven patients received a well-matched graft with both pre- and post-IA negative cross-matching. Graft survival was 86% in this group. Conversely, in the group of five transplants which were performed in recipients having a positive historical cross-match with the donor, graft survival was only 40%. One patient died with a functional graft, and two grafts failed due to hyperacute humoral rejection. Humoral rejection in a third patient was successfully treated by a second IA course and administration of polyclonal IgG. We conclude that IA is a safe procedure for managing hyperimmunized transplant candidates. However, its efficacy remains variable, and a better definition of patients who should benefit from IA needs to be found.     

高敏肾移植受者的二硫基苏糖醇—群体反应性抗体测定及其意义

为了进一步解释群体反应性抗体(PRA)的免疫球蛋白性质及其对异基因肾移植的潜在威胁。方法 借助二硫基苏糖醇(DTT)具有断裂Ig的二硫键,解聚大分子量的IgM分子的原理,将DTT引进PRA实验中,建立DTT-PRA分析方法,以分辨高PRA患者血清中的Ig类型。结果 发现在标准PRA阳性的701例受者中DTT-PRA阳性率为33.1％,依靠患者血清对DTT敏感与否可将PRA阳性患者分为单纯IgM、单纯IgG和IgG、IgM混合类型3种。结论 单纯IgM抗体与移植后排斥反应无关,而单纯IgG和IgC、IgM混合类型的HLA抗体将介导急性甚至超急排斥反应的发生。     

Cross-reactivity between swine leukocyte antigen and human anti-HLA-specific antibodies in sensitized patients awaiting renal transplantation

Xenotransplantation is increasingly viewed as a promising way to alleviate the problem of patients who have alloreactive lymphocytotoxic antibodies and therefore tend to accumulate on the waiting list for renal transplantation. One barrier to xenotransplantation in these patients could be the hyperacute or acute vascular rejection as a result of preexisting anti-HLA antibodies that recognize swine leukocyte antigens. The cross-reactivity of sera from 98 patients with pig lymphocytes was studied by flow cytometry. After absorption of xenoreactive natural antibodies (XNA), isotype, class, and antibody specificity causing a positive cross-match (XM) were determined. For nonsensitized patients, all of the antibody binding to pig lymphocytes was due to XNA, which were removed by pig red blood cells absorption. In contrast, in sensitized patients, after removal of XNA, pig lymphocyte XM remained positive. There was no correlation between antibody binding to pig lymphocytes and Ig isotype (IgG or IgM) or HLA class-specific antibodies. For testing evidence that class II-specific antibodies were responsible for antibody binding to pig lymphocytes, HLA class I-specific antibodies were absorbed with pooled human platelets. It was confirmed that HLA class II-specific antibodies were responsible for the positive pig XM, but the strength of the positive XM was weaker than the strength caused by HLA class I-specific antibodies. Sera with multiple specificities (plurispecific sera) displayed a greater frequency of cross-reactivity with swine leukocyte antigens (P < 0.05). Seven of 11 highly immunized patients without cross-reactivity IgG with porcine lymphocytes showed positive XM before an IgM was used. The results demonstrate the cross-reactive nature of HLA antibodies and therefore point out the need to perform a prospective XM after absorption of XNA in presensitized individuals.     

Clinical importance of anti-human leukocyte antigen-specific antibody concentration in performing calculated panel reactive antibody and virtual crossmatches

BACKGROUND: Highly sensitized patients develop multi-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) specific antibodies. This study measures concentrations of anti-HLA antibodies in multispecific sera by converting fluorescence intensity into molecules of equivalent soluble fluorochrome (MESF) units. This was used to determine MESF units required for a positive T and B flow crossmatches (FLXM). METHODS: MESF values of negative controls and sera from patients devoid of HLA antibodies were measured by FLXM and flow panel reactive antibody (PRA) screening beads. Fluorescence intensity values of anti-HLA specific antibodies determined by FlowPRA single antigen beads of highly sensitized patients were converted into MESF units. In addition, endpoint titers, MESF units, and % PRA of 26 sera were established. RESULTS: MESF analysis accurately predicted the outcomes of 100% of T and B FLXM of sera with strong (MESF units>18,000) donor-specific antibody (DSA). The predictive values of T and B FLXM declined to 95% and 88% with weak DSA (6,000 MESF<10,000). Endpoint titers of sera from highly sensitized patients ranged from 1:512 to 1:8 with corresponding MESF values of 452,596 to 20,000 units. However, there was no statistical difference in PRA values among these sera (95%-100%). We successfully transplanted five patients who had weak donor-specific HLA antibodies (MESF units>2,000). The graft survival at 1 year was 100% and there was no evidence of DSA posttransplant. CONCLUSION: MESF analysis is both a time and cost efficient way of measuring antibody strength. The strength of the antibody present in the sera of transplant candidates is critical for crossmatch prediction.     

Does exposure to swine leukocyte antigens after pig‐to‐nonhuman primate xenotransplantation provoke antibodies that cross‐react with human leukocyte antigens?

BACKGROUND: A potential concern of using pig kidney xenografts for human transplantation is that antibodies produced to swine leukocyte antigens (SLA) may cross-react with human leukocyte antigens (HLA) and thereby limit the scope for a subsequent human organ donor transplant. We therefore investigated whether exposure to SLA after pig-to-nonhuman primate kidney xenotransplantation gives rise to HLA cross-reactive antibodies. METHODS: Serum samples were obtained from 52 cynomolgus monkeys that received kidney transplants from human decay-accelerating factor (hDAF) transgenic pigs. Samples were collected pre-transplant and at time of autopsy (mean 20 days post-transplantation, range 1 to 53 days) and analyzed for IgG HLA class I and HLA class II specific antibodies by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) against pooled purified HLA antigens. To ensure the ability of the HLA ELISA to detect cynomolgus monkey IgG binding, parallel experiments were performed to detect IgG Gal-alpha-1,3-Gal-specific antibodies known to be present in cynomolgus monkey serum. RESULTS: Analysis of both pre- and post-transplantation serum samples by ELISA demonstrated no detectable IgG antibody binding to HLA class I or class II antigens. Using the same ELISA antibody detection reagents, IgG Gal-alpha-1,3-Gal-specific antibodies were identified in 13 of 38 (34%) sera obtained before transplantation and 21 of 52 (40%) sera collected post-transplantation, confirming that the negativeHLA ELISA results were not due to a technical aspect of the assay. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that exposure to SLA following transplantation of porcine kidneys in nonhuman primates does not give rise to antibodies that cross-react with HLA.     

Flow cytometry beads rather than the antihuman globulin method should be used to detect HLA Class I IgG antibody (PRA) in cadaveric renal regraft candidates

Abstract: HLA Class I antibody screening can be performed by flow cytometry using a mixture of 30 distinct bead populations each coated with the Class I antigen phenotype derived from different cell lines. In this study we compared the efficacy of Class I antibody screens done by flow cytometry beads with the antihuman globulin (AHG) method for patients awaiting cadaveric renal retransplantation. Class I panel reactive antibody (PRA) screening by flow cytometric beads of 21 regraft serum samples that had all been found to be negative by AHG DTT Class I PRA, revealed that 57.1% (12 of 21) had a flow Class I PRA of ≥ 10%. Furthermore, when five regraft sera with an intermediate PRA were screened (mean AHG DTT PRA = 33.2 ± 13%) the mean flow Class I PRA almost doubled (mean flow PRA = 72.4 ± 10.2%) ( p  < 0.01). When active UNOS waiting list regraft candidates, after several months of screening the Class I PRA by flow beads, were divided into the three PRA categories based on their peak flow Class I PRA value (0−20%, 21−79% and ≥ 80%), the incidence of a positive flow cross-match was 0%, 72% and 85% and the incidence of retransplantation was 60%, 22% and 10%, in each of these groups, respectively. These data provided our histocompatibility laboratory with the rationale to stop performing the AHG PRA and perform only the flow Class I PRA method for regraft candidates.     

Contributions and clinical significance of IgM and autoantibodies in highly sensitized renal allograft recipients

The contributions of auto and IgM antibodies in the levels of serologic reactivities of 30 highly sensitized patients were assessed by autologous T cell crossmatches at 4 degrees C and 22 degrees C and dithiothreitol (DTT) reduction of IgM antibodies. The range of panel reactivities of sera from these patients was 30-100%, median 55%. A monthly screen of these sera against a 30-member T cell panel was performed with and without addition of DTT (final concentration = 0.005 M). The results were divided into 3 groups. Group 1 consisted of 17 sera whose PRA values did not change following the DTT treatment. Also none of these sera had autoantibodies, suggesting that these sera contained DTT-resistant (IgG) antibodies, most likely directed against allogeneic targets. Group 2 consisted of 10 sera whose PRA values declined substantially (20-42%) following the DTT treatment, but only 1 serum derived from a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus had autoantibodies. These results suggested that although these sera contained IgM and IgG antibodies, these antibodies were most likely directed at allogeneic target structures with only one exception. Group 3 consisted of 3 sera that became completely unreactive to panel lymphocytes following the DTT treatment. All 3 sera had autoantibodies that were also removed with DTT, suggesting that these sera contained predominantly IgM antibodies directed at autologous target cells. All 3 patients from whom these sera were derived received successful kidney transplants across donor-specific positive T cell crossmatches that became negative following the DTT treatment. We conclude that although 13 out of 30 patients have IgM antibodies, only a small subset of these patients have autoantibodies. Renal transplantation in the presence of auto/IgM antibodies may be safe.     

Allosensitized humans are at no greater risk of humoral rejection of GT-KO pig organs than other humans

BACKGROUND: The availability of pigs homozygous for alpha1,3-galactosyltransferase gene-knockout (GT-KO) has enabled study of the incidence and cytotoxicity of primate antibodies directed to antigens other than Galalpha1,3Gal (Gal), termed non-Gal antigens. METHODS: Sera from 27 healthy humans and 31 patients awaiting renal allotransplantation, who were either unsensitized [panel reactive antibodies (PRA) < 10%] or allosensitized (PRA > 70%), were tested by flow cytometry for binding of immunoglobulin M (IgM) and IgG to peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from both wild-type (WT) and GT-KO pigs. Complement-dependent cytotoxicity to WT and GT-KO PBMC was also measured. RESULTS: IgM and IgG from all 27 (100%) healthy human sera bound to WT PBMC, while 78% and 63% of these sera had IgM and IgG that bound to GT-KO PBMC, respectively. Mean binding to WT PBMC was significantly greater than GT-KO PBMC. Whereas 100% of sera were cytotoxic to WT PBMC, only 61% were cytotoxic to GT-KO PBMC, and the extent of lysis was significantly less. Neither mean binding of IgM and IgG nor cytotoxicity of unsensitized and allosensitized sera to WT and GT-KO PBMC was significantly different to that of healthy sera. CONCLUSIONS: More than half of the healthy humans tested had cytotoxic antibodies to GT-KO PBMC, but allosensitized patients will be at no greater risk of rejecting a pig xenograft by a humoral mechanism.     

Long-term kidney graft survival across a positive historic but negative current sensitized cross-match

BACKGROUND: The sensitive cross-match (XM) techniques that have been introduced for clinical transplantation can detect anti-donor immune reactivity despite a negative standard National Institute of Health (NIH) cross-match. One of them uses anti-kappa human light chain globulins (AHG). But there is some discussion about the clinical consequences of a positive AHG-XM in the historical sera that became negative in the sera collected just before the transplantation (pretransplant sera). This study was intended to assess the risk of kidney graft failure associated with a positive historic but negative pretransplant AHG-XM in allosensitized patients having a negative historic NIH-XM. METHODS: This retrospective study includes 90 consecutive renal transplants in immunized patients performed at one center between 1985 and 1991. All of the patients had negative historical and pretransplant standard NIH lymphocytotoxic cross-matches and received the same immunosuppressive regimen. The AHG-XMs were done retrospectively using peak historic and sera collected on the day of the transplantation. RESULTS: The AHG cross-match (AHG-XM) was positive in 17 patients, although the standard NIH cross-match was negative. Fourteen of them had a positive historical but negative pretransplant AHG-XM. The actuarial graft survival in this group of 14 patients was 100% at 1 year and 78% at 9 years compared with 90 and 67%, respectively, in patients with negative historical AHG-XM. In addition, the number of rejection episodes per patient as well as renal function at 1, 2, and 5 years were similar in the two groups. IgG anti-donor HLA class I accounted for the XM positivity in 12 of the 14 patients; most rapidly lost all antibody reactivity by NIH technique in an average time of 8 months before the transplantation. In conclusion, this study suggests that transplant patients having a negative historic NIH-XM but a positive historic AHG-XM may not be at high risk of graft failure especially if there is a well-documented sera history showing a marked decrease in PRA level before transplantation and a negative pretransplant AHG-XM.     

Flow cytometric crossmatching and panel-reactive antibodies in chronic renal failure patients

Aim

Anti-donor antibodies, denoted as “panel-reactive antibodies” (PRAs), are one of the most important factors influencing graft survival after renal transplantation. PRA is generally analyzed with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay or flow cytometry (FC), which identify the HLA antigen specific for the preformed antibody.

Patients and methods

We tested 66 patients for FC crossmatch (FCXM) when they were called for cadaveric renal transplantation. Thirty of 66 patients were FCXM-positive; 36 were FCXM-negative. Among the FCXM positive crossmatches, 21 were T- and B-cell positive; seven B positive; and two T positive. The HLA antibodies in the sera of FCXM-positive patients were reanalyzed using flow-PRA.

Results

We detected HLA antibodies in 28/66 sera with flow PRA. The sera of 16/21 T-/B-, FCXM-positive patients contained both class I and II anti-HLA antibodies, five had only class I anti-HLA antibodies. One out of seven B-cell FCXM-positive patients had class I and class II anti-HLA antibodies, three, class I and 1 class II anti-HLA antibodies; the other two were negative. Class I and class II HLA antibodies were observed in two T-cell FCXM-positive patients. Four of 36 patients who were FCXM-negative were flow PRA positive: one had both class I and class II HLA antibodies and three, only class I HLA antibody. The comparison of FCXM and flow PRA results was significant (P = .001).

Conclusion

FCXM results may be confirmed by flow PRA tests, an important method to differentiate HLA versus non-HLA antibodies.     

Different responses of human anti-HLA and anti-αgal antibody to long-term intravenous immunoglobulin therapy

Concentrated human immunoglobulin (IVIG) has been administered intravenously in the treatment of autoimmune disorders and to reduce anti-HLA antibodies in highly sensitized patients awaiting organ transplantation. It has also been shown, in experimental animals, to prevent the hyperacute rejection of discordant xenografts, possibly by anticomplement activity. The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of IVIG therapy on both acquired anti-HLA antibodies and natural antigalactose α1–3 galactose (αGal) antibodies in five patients awaiting heart transplantation. Five patients placed on mechanical circulatory support who had developed high HLA panel-reactive antibodies (PRA) or in whom the percentage of PRA was increasing rapidly were treated weekly with 500 mg/kg IVIG, which contained 1% of anti-αGal IgG. Levels of PRA, anti-αGal IgG and IgM, and serum cytotoxicity to pig cells were measured before, during, and after therapy. PRA percentages in the five patients were initially 85%, 53%, 23%, 19% and 19% (mean 39%). Mean PRA fell by 66% after 3 months of therapy (to a mean PRA of 14%), and by 96% after 6 months therapy (to a mean PRA of 2%). Anti-αGal antibody levels and serum cytotoxicity to pig aortic endothelial cells did not change significantly. These results confirm the effectiveness of IVIG therapy in reducing PRA in HLA highly sensitized patients. It is likely that IVIG does not contain the relevant anti-HLA antibody, resulting in an accelerated catabolism of native alloantibodies. However, as IVIG contains a normal level of anti-αGal IgG, catabolism of anti-αGal IgG is not modified, as it is being continuously replaced. To achieve a decrease in the anti-αGal IgG level it would be necessary to use IVIG depleted of this antibody.     

Detection and analysis of HLA class I and class II specific alloantibodies in the sera of dialysis recipients waiting for a renal retransplantation

The objective of this study was to evaluate the specificities of HLA class I (-A,-B) and class II (-DR,-DQ) antibodies (Ab) detected in the sera of alloimmunized patients waiting for a subsequent renal transplantation. The study group consisted of 62 dialysis patients (42 men and 20 women, mean age: 43 +/- 18 yr) on waiting list for a subsequent kidney transplant (52 for a second and 10 for a third transplant) at S. Martino Hospital Transplant Centre in Genoa/Italy, who were enrolled from 2002 to 2004 for HLA antibody screening. Complement dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) technique was used firstly to select anti-HLA class I sensitized patients; indeed sera from 50 individuals out of 62 (80.6%) were found to display persistent HLA class I PRA (panel reactive antibody) values >4% (range: 20-100). ELISA technique was subsequently adopted to analyze HLA class I Ab positive sera for the presence also of HLA class II Ab and to characterize class I and class II Ab specificities. Anti-class I immunized patients were divided in three groups according to the type of class I Ab specificities, that were classified as private, public, and multispecific. The first group included 35 patients (70% of the total number of positive patients) showing only antibodies directed against private HLA class I specificities, represented in 33 cases by those expressed by graft donors (first or second transplant). In this group anti-class I PRA% values ranged from 20% to 60%. HLA class II Ab, with an heterogeneous specificity pattern (private, public or multispecific), were present in 25 (78.1%) out of the 32 patients, whose sera were also available for this analysis. The second group comprised 12 patients (24%) who displayed antibodies directed against class I public epitopes belonging to CREGs (Cross reactive Groups) or an association of anti-private and anti-public antibodies. In this group PRA values ranged from 25% to 90%. Five patients (46.7%) were positive for HLA class II Ab, whose specificity pattern appeared also heterogeneous (private or multispecific). The third group was represented by three patients (6%) displaying multispecific antibodies with PRA values > or = 90%. No multispecific class II Ab were found in this group, where only two patients had class II Ab showing anti-private or anti-private plus public specificities. Globally, 74% of anti-class I Ab positive patients, having at least one HLA class II antigen mismatch, appeared also positive for class II Ab. These results indicate that: (i) a large proportion of patients, waiting for a kidney retransplantation, display in their sera alloantibodies specific for graft mismatched HLA class I (80.6%) and class II antigens (54.2); (ii) the immunogenic determinants, mainly involved in HLA class I and II specific Ab production, were, in a significant rate, private specificities of mismatched HLA antigens (70% for class I and 59.4% for class II), and in a lesser percentage by public (CREG) epitopes (24% for class I and 34.3% for class II). In a few patients only no HLA class I and class II Ab specificities could be determined, as they displayed multispecific antibodies (6% for class I and 6.2% for class II). These findings may have important implications to improve donor-recipient matching in dialysis recipients waiting for a subsequent renal transplantation.     

Panel reactive antibody positivity and associated HLA antibodies in Turkish renal transplant candidates

Pre- and post-renal transplantation panel reactive antibody (PRA) screening is associated with increased incidence of hyperacute or acute graft rejection and graft loss. This study was designed to find any relationship PRA sensitization and associated human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-specific antibodies in Turkish renal transplant candidates. We included 340 patients who were in the renal transplantation waiting list in the study. We determined PRA sensitization ratio and the associated anti-HLA IgG antibody distribution of the patient group. The PRA testing was currently performed and levels above 30% were accepted to be positive. The PRA class I positivity was determined in 24 (7%) and class II in 34 (10%) of the patients. The most frequent HLA antibodies for class I were B56, A2, A34, A1, A23, A24 and B61; and for class II were DR11, DR14, DQ7, DR10, DQ5, DR1 and DR7, respectively. From these, the increase of the numbers of anti-HLA class II antibodies was significantly correlated with the increase of PRA sensitization ratio. In conclusion, the identification of the associated HLA-specific antibodies and correlation with the Turkish population HLA antigen distribution will identify the high-risk patients who are candidates for transplantation.     

Sensitization and sensitivity: defining the unsensitized patient

BACKGROUND: Since the landmark studies of Patel and Terasaki in the late 1960s, pretransplant cross-matching has been performed by HLA laboratories on a 24-hr/7-day basis. In fact, regulating agencies such as the American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics and the United Network for Organ Sharing have mandated prospective crossmatching for selected solid organ transplants. However, two recent publications (Transplantation 1998; 66: 1833; and Transplantation 1998; 66: 1835) have suggested a change to this approach. Specifically, those authors advocate the transplantation of non-sensitized individuals without a final prospective cross-match as a means to reduce cold ischemia time and the incidence of delayed graft function. Such considerations were predicated upon results generated by cytotoxicity-based antibody screening. We and others, however, have reported that a flow cytometric-based assay is a more sensitive method to detect alloantibodies than cytotoxicity. Furthermore, an increasing number of reports document that graft survival is improved among patients whose final flow cytometric crossmatches were negative compared to patients with positive flow cytometric crossmatches. Although we agree that it is reasonable to transplant truly non-sensitized patients without a prospective final crossmatch, our data demonstrate that a large number of patients deemed non-sensitized by cytotoxicity-based antibody assessment are, in fact, sensitized. METHODS: Panel-reactive antibody (PRA) testing was performed with 703 sera from 527 patients. The patient population consisted of individuals awaiting either renal or cardiac transplantation. PRA evaluations were performed using lymphocyte cytotoxicity (antiglobulin-enhanced, complement-dependent cytotoxicity [AHG-CDC]) or assays (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA]; flow cytometry) in which solubilized HLA molecules were affixed to solid phase matrices. RESULTS: PRA activity in 264 sera from 88 patients was evaluated by AHG-CDC, ELISA, and flow cytometry. Results among the three methods were concordant for 83% of these sera. Discordant results occurred with 32 samples and demonstrated a distinct hierarchy in the sensitivity of the three techniques to detect alloantibodies. None of the 32 sera were positive by AHG-CDC, 20/32 were positive by ELISA, and 32/32 were positive by flow cytometry. Subsequent studies revealed that, among 527 patients, 302 (57%) exhibited 0% PRA by AHG-CDC. Of these 302 AHG-CDC-negative patients, 76 (25%) had class I or class II antibodies detectable using a flow cytometric approach. Within the AHG-CDC-negative/flow cytometric-positive patients, PRA values exhibited a wide range (6-99%) for both class I and class II antibodies. The average PRA was 27% and 38% for class I and II, respectively. Retrospective flow cytometric crossmatches performed for 30 recipients of cardiac allografts whose AHG-CDC PRA were 0% revealed that 11/30 crossmatches were positive. CONCLUSIONS: The concept of transplanting non-sensitized patients without a prospective final crossmatch is appealing and, if bona fide, clearly makes sense. However, our data demonstrate that how a patient is deemed non-sensitized is critical. The difference between AHG- and flow cytometric-based PRA testing is significant and can result in transplantation of alloimmunized patients considered to be non-sensitized. Therefore, we recommend that, if a transplant center chooses to forego a prospective final crossmatch, the decision to do so should be based on methods more sensitive than AHG-CDC.     

Removal of lymphocytotoxic antibodies by pretransplant immunoadsorption therapy in highly sensitized renal transplant recipients

A high level of panel-reactive antibodies (PRA) in potential renal transplant recipients is associated with a long waiting time until transplantation and correlates inversely with graft outcome. We report our experience with the employment of immunoadsorption (IA) using a column composed to sepharose-bound staphylococcal protein A (which has a relatively selective affinity for binding IgG compared with other immunoglobulins) to decrease the PRA levels and expedite transplantation in 6 highly sensitized potential renal transplant recipients (1 primary and 5 awaiting second transplants). All patients had PRA levels of greater than or equal to 70% for a duration of 1 year prior to IA. Only patients with antibody specificity localized to 1 or 2 HLA A or B antigens were accepted for the study. IA procedures were performed on alternate days until a twofold decrease in antibody titer had occurred (maximum: 6 procedures). Repeat procedures were initiated if the HLA antibody titer returned to its baseline value. Intravenous cyclophosphamide (CY) (10 mg/kg/day every 3 weeks) and methylprednisolone (MP) (0.5 mg/kg/day) were provided as adjunctive immunosuppression until transplantation. A total of 44 immunoadsorption procedures were performed (27 primary and 17 repeat) with treatment of 2.49 +/- 0.02 plasma volumes per session. Serum IgG concentration decreased 95 +/- 3% and PRA activity decreased 75 +/- 16% after the primary treatment course. Four patients received cadaveric grafts within 3.7 +/- 1.2 months following the last IA procedure. Three grafts are functioning at 1 year, 8 months, and 8 weeks posttransplant. The remaining graft demonstrated primary nonfunction. All four patients had a past positive crossmatch using pre-IA sera with their respective donors. Patients not transplanted exhibited rapid resynthesis of IgG and a return of the PRA towards baseline levels within a few weeks after IA. We conclude that IA can effectively remove HLA antibodies and expedite graft availability in highly sensitized patients.     

HLA Class II-Like Antiidiotypic Antibodies from Highly Sensitized Patients Inhibit T-Cell Alloresponses

The purpose of this study is to identify factors in the sera of highly sensitized (HS) patients (pts) that inhibit T-cell alloresponses. An in vitro assay was used to measure HLA class I and class II-like antiidiotypic antibodies (anti-ids). The stimulation index (SI) was used to measure PBL and T-cell responses to alloantigens. All HS sera (32 pts) and the IgG fraction inhibited PBL and CD4⁺ T-cell responses to alloantigens. The SI with HS IgG was 7.9 ± 1.7 as compared to 31.5 ± 5.9 with normal IgG (p = 0.0003). In a subset of pts who were transiently sensitized, the SI was 6.6 ± 1.0 with a high panel reactive antibody (PRA), but when their PRA was zero, the SI was 17.8 ± 1.3 (p = 0.0000001). Anti-ids were found in 100% of 17 pts with a high PRA. The T-cell inhibitory factors reduced CD4⁺ T-cell responses of HS pts to alloantigens in the presence of autologous anti-ids, were MHC restricted and were inactivated by in vitro generated antibodies to HLA class II-like anti-ids. The HLA class II-like anti-id IgG molecules bind to the TCR of CD4⁺ T cells and may impair their ability to help in the downregulating antibody response to anti-ids.