首页 | 官方网站   微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
2.
Background: Women generally report greater sensitivity to pain than do men, and healthy young women require 20% more anesthetic than healthy age-matched men to prevent movement in response to noxious electrical stimulation. In contrast, minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) for xenon is 26% less in elderly Japanese women than in elderly Japanese men. Whether anesthetic requirement is similar in men and women thus remains in dispute. The authors therefore tested the hypothesis that the desflurane concentration required to prevent movement in response to skin incision (MAC) differs between men and women.

Methods: Using the Dixon "up and down" method, the authors determined MAC for desflurane in 15 female and 15 male patients (18-40 yr old) undergoing surgery.

Results: MAC was 6.2 +/- 0.4% desflurane for women versus 6.0 +/- 0.3% for men (P = 0.31), a difference of only 3%. These data provide 90% power to detect a 9% difference between the groups.  相似文献   


3.
Background: A recent report finds that elderly Japanese women given xenon have a significantly smaller (26% less) MAC (minimum alveolar concentration required to eliminate movement in response to surgical incision in 50% of patients) than Japanese men of the same age. The authors assessed whether this finding applied to other/all anesthetics.

Methods: The authors reviewed data obtained previously for 258 patients (127 women and 131 men) anesthetized with desflurane, diethyl ether, halothane, methoxyflurane, sevoflurane, or xenon. Data were normalized to the MAC for the anesthetic as determined by logistic regression (i.e., MAC would equal a value of 1.000.)

Results: The MAC for the normalized combined (all) data for women (1.013 +/- 0.017; mean +/- SEM) did not differ significantly from the normalized combined data for men (1.005 +/- 0.009), and neither differed significantly from 1.000. However, a significantly smaller MAC value was found for women in two studies of sevoflurane (subsets of the above studies) given to Japanese patients: 12% in one study and 16% in the other.  相似文献   


4.
Background: Black women with breast cancer have significantly worse survival rates and receive diagnoses at relatively younger ages, compared with white patients with breast cancer, in the United States. Young age at diagnosis has been associated with increased risk for local recurrence (LR) after breast-conservation therapy (BCT). The goal of this study was to evaluate the impact of age and BCT on LR and survival rates among black patients with breast cancer.Methods: The records for 363 black women treated for breast cancer (excluding stage IV disease) at a comprehensive cancer center were reviewed.Results: Fifty-eight percent of patients (n = 211) had tumors 5 cm in diameter. Forty-two of these patients (19.9%) received BCT; the LR rate for this group was 9.8%. A total of 168 patients (79.6%) underwent mastectomy; the LR rate for this group was 8.9%. Data on the primary operation were unavailable for one patient. Five-year disease-free survival rates were similar for patients treated with BCT and those treated with mastectomy (88% and 73%, respectively). LR was associated with significant decreases in 5-year overall survival rates for both the BCT group (67% vs. 95%, P < .01) and the mastectomy group (43% vs. 76%, P < .01). LR and 5-year diseasespecific survival rates were similar for patients <50 years of age and patients 50 years of age, regardless of treatment.Conclusions: LR and survival rates are not compromised by the use of BCT among black American patients. LR is associated with an increased risk of breast cancer death, regardless of treatment type. Younger age at diagnosis was not associated with an increased rate of LR after BCT in this series.  相似文献   

5.
6.
▪  Abstract: The study aim was to compare breast cancer treatment and survival between older and younger women treated at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center over a 30-year period, 1958–1987. Data were obtained from the Medical Informatics Tumor Registry and were examined by 15-year time periods. Treatments were stratified by no surgery, surgery alone, or surgery and additional treatment. Mantel–Haenszel chi-square statistics and actuarial life tables were used for comparisons. Among 3,382 women treated for breast cancer, treatment differed by age groups (p < 0.01). The most consistent finding by disease stage was that older women were less likely to receive treatment in addition to surgery compared to younger women (p < 0.01–0.05). Among women with local or regional involvement who received surgery and additional treatment, 5-year survival was similar regardless of age group. However, among women with distant disease who received surgery and additional treatment, 5-year survival differed significantly by age group (p = 0.03); women in the 65- to 74-year age group experienced the best survival. In this hospital population, older women with breast cancer who received surgery and additional treatment experienced similar, sometimes better, 5-year survival compared with younger women, which suggests that older women, in some cases, may benefit from combined modality treatment for breast cancer. ▪  相似文献   

7.
8.
Background There is growing evidence that tumors of the inner quadrants (especially the lower-inner quadrant) metastasize more often to the internal mammary chain (IMC). As these metastases are not investigated, patients with lower-inner quadrant tumors have an increased risk of being under-staged and under-treated and may therefore have a higher risk of death from breast cancer. Methods We identified all 1522 women operated for stage I breast cancer between 1984 and 2002 recorded at the population-based Geneva Cancer Registry. We compared breast cancer mortality risk by tumor location with multivariate Cox regression analysis that accounted for all factors linked to tumor location and survival. Results Ten-year disease-specific survival was 93% (95%CI: 91–94%). Patients with breast cancer of the lower-inner quadrant (n = 118; 7.8%) had an importantly increased risk of dying of breast cancer compared to women with breast cancer of the upper-outer quadrant (multiadjusted Hazard Ratio: 2.3, 95%CI: 1.1–4.5, P = 0.0206). The over-mortality associated with this quadrant was particularly evident for tumors >10 mm (multiadjusted HR: 3.6, 95%CI: 1.6–7.9, P = 0.0016). There was no increased breast cancer mortality risk for tumors located in other quadrants. Conclusions Tumor location in the lower-inner quadrant is an independent and important prognostic factor of stage I breast cancer. Further research is needed to evaluate if the over-mortality of patients with stage I cancer of the lower-inner quadrant is indeed a result of under-treatment due to undetected IMC metastases. If so, patients with stage I breast cancer of the lower-inner quadrant are good candidates for systematic IMC investigation. Part of this study was presented as a poster at the 28th San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, December 8-11, 2005.  相似文献   

9.

Background

The influence of patient age on multidisciplinary treatment planning after preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and its influence on the surgical decision-making process are unclear.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of 710 women with breast cancer who underwent preoperative MRI at our institution between January 2003 and December 2008. Analysis by patient age included the number of additional ipsilateral MRI findings, the number of biopsies recommended/performed, the number of additional cancers found, and the percentage of patients undergoing mastectomy.

Results

Of the 710 patients, 343 (48%) had additional ipsilateral MRI findings. After stratifying by age, the incidence of additional ipsilateral findings differed between decades (P = 0.004). However, fewer biopsies were recommended in older patients (P = 0.043). The number of women pursuing preoperative needle biopsy increased with age (P = 0.0018), while the incidence of a second focus of breast cancer did not change with age (P = 0.07). The mastectomy rate decreased from 65% in women younger than 50 to 40% in women older than 70 (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

In the setting of newly diagnosed breast cancer, the value of MRI is not influenced by patient age, with at least 40% of women in all age groups having additional findings on MRI. Insisting on preoperative needle biopsy of additional findings may decrease mastectomy rates. Further study is needed to determine the reasons for the increased percentage of mastectomies in younger women.  相似文献   

10.
Background Breast cancer metastatic to the gastrointestinal tract or peritoneum is rare. We reviewed the natural history of ductal and lobular carcinoma in women with breast cancer metastatic to the gastrointestinal tract, peritoneum, or both. Methods We performed a retrospective review of all patients (1985–2000) with a pathologic diagnosis of breast cancer metastatic to the gastrointestinal tract or peritoneum. Patients were categorized into three groups: those with gastrointestinal metastasis, carcinomatosis, or both. Results Of 73 patients, 23 (32%) had gastrointestinal metastasis only, 32 (44%) had carcinomatosis only, and 18 (25%) had both. The median age at initial breast cancer diagnosis was 55 years. The mean interval between the primary diagnosis and metastatic presentation was 7 years. Sites of gastrointestinal metastases included the esophagus (8%), stomach (28%), small intestine (19%), and colon and rectum (45%). Infiltrating lobular carcinoma represented 34 (64%) of the 53 gastrointestinal metastases. The median overall survival after diagnosis was 28 months. Palliative surgical intervention in 47 patients (64%) did not affect overall survival. Some survival benefit may have accrued to select patients with gastrointestinal metastasis who underwent surgical palliation (44 vs. 9 months). Advanced age at diagnosis and gastric metastases had a negative effect on survival, whereas treatment with systemic chemotherapy or tamoxifen had a positive effect on survival. Conclusions Gastrointestinal metastasis occurred more often in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma. Surgical intervention did not significantly extend overall survival but may be considered in a select group of patients.  相似文献   

11.
12.
Abstract: This review addresses the management of breast cancer in women over 65 years of age. In 1995, approximately 50% of breast cancers will be diagnosed in this quickly growing segment of our population. Breast cancer screening and treatment modalities including surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy are underutilized in the geriatric population. Several recent studies demonstrate that healthy older women, like younger women, benefit from screening and tolerate surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy well. We will discuss current screening and treatment recommendations based on a review of pertinent literature.  相似文献   

13.
There are a number of issues specific to breast cancer diagnosis in young women:
1 Breast cancer is uncommon in young women. It is associated with more-aggressive behavior and a worse prognosis. These clinical observations have recently been verified by histologic and biochemical analyses of these cancers.
2 Young women undergoing breast-conservation therapy can have a higher rate of local recurrence than older women, and this issue should be specifically addressed in preoperative counseling of these women.
3 Long life expectancy, issues of fertility, and risk of premature menopause resulting from cytotoxic chemotherapy are concerns unique to the young breast cancer patient.
4 Issues related to a new diagnosis of breast cancer associated with pregnancy bring up a multitude of issues in this vulnerable population.
5 Psychosocial issues of sexuality and self-image can warrant interventions in this population.

References

1 Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results Program, Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results program public use CD-ROM, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD (2000).
2 J.E.C. Kollias, I.O. Ellis, J.F. Robertson and R.W. Blamey, Early-onset breast cancer: histopathological and prognostic consideration, Br J Cancer 75 (1997), pp. 1318–1323. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (98)
3 C. Shannon and I.E. Smith, Breast cancer in adolescents and young women, Eur J Cancer 39 (2003), pp. 2632–2642. Article | PDF (242 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (38)
4 R.A. Walker, E. Lees, M.B. Webb and S.J. Dearing, Breast carcinomas occurring in young women are different, Br J Cancer 74 (1996), pp. 1796–1800. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (97)
5 D.P. Winchester, R.T. Osteen and H.R. Menck, The National Cancer Data Base report on breast cancer characteristics and outcome in relation to age, Cancer 78 (1996), pp. 1838–1843. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (83)
6 M. Chung, H.R. Chang, K.I. Bland and H.J. Wanebo, Younger women with breast cancer have a poorer prognosis than older women, Cancer 77 (1996), pp. 97–103. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (168)
7 H.O. Adami, B. Malker and L. Holmberg et al., The relationship between survival and age at diagnosis in breast cancer, N Engl J Med 315 (1986), pp. 559–563. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (174)
8 Y.H. Wen, D.F. Roses and D.M. Axelrod et al., Breast carcinoma in women 30 years and younger: Abstract # 4005, Breast Cancer Res Treat 100 (2006), p. S264.
9 I. Matos, R. Dufloth and M. Alvarenga et al., p63, cytokeratin 5, and P-cadherin: three molecular markers to distinguish basal phenotype in breast cancer, Virchows Archive 447 (2005), pp. 688–694. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (62)
10 K.S. Albains, D.C. Allred and G.M. Clark, Breast cancer outcome and predictors of outcome: are there age differentials?, J Nat Cancer Inst Monogr 16 (1994), pp. 35–42.
11 K.I.J. Holli, Effect of age on the survival of breast cancer patients, Eur J Cancer 33 (1997), pp. 425–428. Abstract | PDF (498 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (38)
12 C. Smigal, A. Jemal and E. Ward et al., Trends in breast cancer by race and ethnicity: update 2006, CA Cancer J Clin 56 (2006), pp. 168–183. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (127)
13 B. DiNubila, E. Cassano and L. Urban et al., Radiologic features and pathological-biological correlations in 348 women with breast cancer under 35 years old, Breast 2 (1016) (2006).
14 S. Weber-Mangal, H.P. Sinn and S. Popp et al., Breast cancer in young women (<35 years): genomic aberrations detected by comparative genomic hybridization, Int J Cancer 107 (2003), pp. 583–592. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (17)
15 American Cancer Society, Breast cancer facts and figures http://www.cancer.org/downloads/stt/caff2005brf.pdf Accessed April 8, 2008.
16 A. Bleyer, A. Viny and R. Barr, Cancer in 15−29 year olds by primary site, Oncologist 11 (2006), pp. 590–601. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (16)
17 R.E. Tarone, Breast cancer trends among young women in the United States, Epidemiology 17 (2006), pp. 588–590. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (18)
18 Anonymous , Stat bite: Breast cancer in young US women, J Nat Cancer Inst 98 (2006), p. 1762.
19 V. Kaklamani, A genetic signature can predict prognosis and response to therapy in breast cancer: oncotype DX, Expert Rev Mol Diagn 6 (2006), pp. 803–809. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (13)
20 N. Klauber-DeMore, Tumor biology of breast cancer in young women, Breast Dis 23 (2005−2006), pp. 9–15.
21 M.J. van de Vijver, H.D. He and L.J. van't Veer et al., A gene expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer, N Engl J Med 347 (2002), pp. 1999–2009. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (1754)
22 S. Braun, F.D. Vogl and B. Naume et al., A pooled analysis of bone marrow micrometastases in breast cancer, N Engl J Med 353 (2005), pp. 793–802. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (216)
23 K. Amend, D. Hicks and C.B. Ambrosone, Review: Breast cancer in African-American women: differences in tumor biology from European-American women, Cancer Res 66 (2006) 8327–8230.
24 J.A. van der Hage, C.J.H. van ed Velde and H. Putter et al., Impact of established prognostic factors in early-stage breast cancer in very young breast cancer patients: a translational research project using pooled datasets derived from 4 EORTC breast group trials: Abstract 6024, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 100 (2006), p. S264.
25 M.A. Bollet, B. Sigal-Zafrani and V. Mazeau et al., Age remains the first prognostic factor for loco-regional recurrence in young (<40 years) women treated with breast conserving surgery first, Radiother Oncol 82 (2007), pp. 272–280. Article | PDF (119 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (16)
26 G. MacKarem, C.A. Roche and K.S. Hughes, The effectiveness of the Gail Model in estimating risk for development of breast cancer in women under 40 years of age, Breast J 7 (2001), pp. 34–39. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (17)
27 J. Chen, D. Pee and R. Ayyagari et al., Projecting absolute invasive breast cancer risk in white women with a model that includes mammographic density, J Nat; Cancer Inst 98 (2006), pp. 1215–1226. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (58)
28 N. Loman, O. Johannsson and U. Kristoffersson et al., Family history of breast and ovarian cancers and BRCA1and BRCA2 Mutations in a population-based series of early-onset breast cancer, J Nat Cancer Inst 93 (2001), pp. 1215–1223. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (84)
29 L.A. Newman, Breast cancer in African-American women, Oncologist 10 (2005), pp. 1–14. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (30)
30 D.M. Winn, The Long Island Breast Cancer Study Project, Nat Rev Cancer 5 (2005), pp. 986–994. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (5)
31 A.L. Herbst, H. Ulfelder and D.C. Poskanzer, Adenocarcinoma of the vagina: Association of maternal stilbestrol use with tumor appearance in young women, N Engl J Med 284 (1971), pp. 878–881. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (541)
32 S. Schrager and B.E. Potter, Diethylstilbestrol exposure, Am Fam Physician 69 (2004), pp. 2395–2440.
33 T. Colton, E.R. Geenberg and L. Noller et al., Breast cancer in mothers prescribed diethylstilbestrol in pregnancy: Further follow-up, JAMA 269 (1993), pp. 2096–3100.
34 J. Prescott, M. Huiyan, L. Bernstein and G. Ursin, Cigarette smoking is not associated with breast cancer risk in young women, Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 16 (2007), pp. 620–622. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (2)
35 D.L. Wahner-Roedler and I.A. Petersen, Risk of breast cancer and breast cancer characteristics in women after treatment for Hodgkin's lymphoma, Drugs Today 40 (2004), pp. 865–879. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (4)
36 D. Longo, Radiation in Hodgkin's disease, J Nat Cancer Inst 97 (2005), pp. 1394–1395. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (8)
37 L. Diller, C.M. Nancarrow and K. Shaffer et al., Breast cancer screening in women previously treated for Hodgkin's disease: a prospective cohort study, J Clin Oncol 20 (2002), pp. 2085–2091. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (45)
38 G. Ursin, R.K. Ross and J. Sullivan-Halley et al., Use of oral contraceptives and the risk of breast cancer in young women, Breast Cancer Res Treat 50 (1998), pp. 175–184. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (36)
39 S.A.N. Silvera, A.B. Miller and T.E. Rohan, Oral contraceptive use and risk of breast cancer among women with a family history of breast cancer: a prospective, cohort study, Cancer Causes Control 16 (2005), pp. 1059–1063. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (16)
40 V. Cogliano, Y. Grosse and R. Baan et al., Carcinogenicity of combined oestrogen-progestagen contraceptives and menopausal treatment, Lancet Oncol 6 (2005), pp. 552–553. Article | PDF (45 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (60)
41 K.E. Innes and T.E. Byers, First pregnancy characteristics and subsequent breast cancer risk among young women, Int J Cancer 112 (2004), pp. 306–311. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (18)
42 V. Beral, D. Bull and R. Doll et al., Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer, Lancet Oncol 363 (2004), pp. 1007–1016.
43 K.B. Michels, F. Xue, G.A. Colditz and W.C. Willett, Induced and spontaneous abortion and incidence of breast cancer among young women, Arch Intern Med 167 (2007), pp. 814–820. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (7)
44 M. Ahlgren, T. Sorensen and J. Wohlfardt et al., Birth weight and risk of breast cancer in a cohort of 106, 504 women, Int J Cancer 107 (2003), pp. 997–1000. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (52)
45 M.R. Forman, M.M. Cantwell, C. Ronckers and Y. Zhang, Through the looking glass at early-life exposures and breast cancer risk, Cancer Invest 23 (2005), pp. 609–624. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (20)
46 W.D. Thompson and D.T. Janerich, Maternal age at birth and risk of breast cancer in daughters, Epidemiology 1 (1990), pp. 101–106. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (30)
47 R.S. Taylor, B.E. Carroll and J.W. Lloyd, Mortality among women in three Catholic orders with special references to cancer, Cancer 12 (1959), pp. 1207–1225. Full Text via CrossRef
48 J.R. Palmer, L.A. Wise and E.E. Hatch et al., Prenatal diethylstilbestrol exposure and risk of breast cancer, Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15 (2006), pp. 1509–1514. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (53)
49 M. Salhab, W. Al Sarakbi and K. Mokbel, In vitro fertilization and breast cancer risk: a review, Int J Fertil Womens Med 50 (2005), pp. 259–266. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (13)
50 D. Mintzer, J. Glassburn, B.A. Mason and D. Sataloff, Breast cancer in the very young patient, Oncologist 7 (2002), pp. 547–554. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (9)
51 M. Golshan, A. Miron and A.J. Nixon et al., The prevalence of germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in young women with breast cancer undergoing breast conservation therapy, Am J Surg 192 (2006), pp. 58–62. Article | PDF (77 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (6)
52 K. Heimdal, L. Maehle and J. Apold et al., The Norwegian founder mutations in BRCA1: high penetrance confirmed in an incident cancer series and differences observed in the risk of ovarian cancer, Eur J Cancer 39 (2003), pp. 2205–2213. Article | PDF (218 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (14)
53 S.N. Stacey, P. Sulem and O.T. Jonannson et al., The BARD1Cys557Ser Variant and breast cancer risk in Iceland, PLoS Med 3 (2006), p. e217. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (7)
54 M.D. Reeves, T.M. Yawitch and N.C. van der Merve et al., BRCA1 mutations in South African breast and/or ovarian cancer families: evidence of a novel founder mutation in Afrikaner families, Int J Cancer 110 (2004), pp. 677–682. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (5)
55 A. Antoniou, P.D. Pharoah and S.A. Narod et al., Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies, Am J Hum Genet 72 (2003), pp. 1117–1130. Article | PDF (524 K) | Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (550)
56 Office of National Statistics, Cancer trends in England and Wales: 1950–1999, Studies on Medical and Population Subjects 66 (2001).
57 A. Broeks, L.M. Braaf and A. Huseinovic et al., Identification of women with an increased risk of developing radiation-induced breast cancer: a case only study, Breast Cancer Res 9 (2007), p. R26. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (15)
58 D.B. Thomas, D.L. Gao and R.M. Ray et al., Randomized trial of breast self-examination in Shanghai: Final results, J Natl Cancer Inst 94 (2002), pp. 1445–1457. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (205)
59 American Society of Clinical Oncology, Statement of the American Society of Clinical Oncology: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility, J Clin Oncol 14 (1996), pp. 1730–1736.
60 V.J. Harris and V.P. Jackson, Indications for breast imaging in women under age 35 years, Radiology 172 (1989), pp. 445–448. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (11)
61 N. Houssami, L. Irwig and J.M. Simpson et al., Sydney breast imaging accuracy study: comparative sensitivity and specificity of mammography and sonography in young women with symptoms, Am J Roentgenol 180 (2003), pp. 935–940. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (38)
62 M. Murrow, S. Wong and L. Ventra, The evaluation of breast masses in women younger than 40 years of age, Surgery 124 (1998), pp. 634–641.
63 E.D. Pisano, C. Gatsonis and E. Hendrick et al., Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast cancer screening, N Engl J Med 353 (2005), pp. 1773–1783. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (312)
64 C.D. Lehman, C. Gatsonis and C.K. Kuhl et al., MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer, N Engl J Med 356 (2007), pp. 1295–1305.
65 M. Kriege, C.T. Brekelmans and I.M. Obdeijn et al., Factors affecting sensitivity and specificity of screening mammography and MRI in women with inherited risk for breast cancer, Breast Cancer Res Treat 100 (2006), pp. 109–119. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (10)
66 S.K. Plevritis, A.W. Kurian and B.M. Sigal, Cost-effectiveness of screening BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with breast magnetic resonance imaging, JAMA 295 (2006), pp. 2374–2384. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (36)
67 J.A. Smith and E. Andreopoulou, An overview of the status of screening technology for breast cancer, Ann Oncol 15 (2004), pp. 18–26.
68 I. Reiser, R.M. Nishikawa and M.L. Giger et al., Computerized mass detection for digital breast tomosynthesis directly from the projection images, Med Phys 33 (2006), pp. 482–491. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (27)
69 M. Brennan, J. French and N. Houssami et al., Breast cancer in young women, Aust Fam Physician 34 (2005), pp. 851–855. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (8)
70 H.I. Vargas, M.P. Vargas and K. Eldrageely et al., Outcomes of surgical and sonographic assessment of breast masses in women younger than 30, Am Surg 71 (2005), pp. 716–719. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (2)
71 K.A. Skinner, H. Silberman, R. Sposto and M.J. Silverstein, Palpable breast cancers are inherently different from nonpalpable breast cancers, Ann Surg Oncol 8 (2001), pp. 705–710. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (13)
72 B. Fisher, J.P. Constantino and D.L. Wickerham et al., Tamoxifen for the prevention of breast cancer: current status of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 Study, J Natl Cancer Inst 97 (2005), pp. 1652–1662. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (200)
73 M.C. King, J.H. Marks, J.B. Mandell and N.Y.B.C.S. Group, Breast and ovarian cancer risks due to inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2, Science 302 (2003), pp. 643–646. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (425)
74 S.M. Domchek, J.E. Stopfer and T.R. Rebbeck, Bilateral risk-reducing oophorectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers, J Natl Compr Canc Netw 4 (2006), pp. 177–182. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (3)
75 T.R. Rebbeck, T. Friebel and T. Wagner et al., Effect of short-term hormone replacement therapy on breast cancer risk reduction after bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: the PROSE Study Group, J Clin Oncol 23 (2005), pp. 7804–7810. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (77)
76 L. Lostumbo, N. Carbine, J. Wallace and J. Ezzo, Prophylactic mastectomy for the prevention of breast cancer, Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2004) October 18;(4):CD002748.
77 P. Hopwood, A. Lee and A. Shenton et al., Clinical follow-up after bilateral risk-reducing (propylactic) mastectomy: mental health and body image outcomes, Psychooncology 9 (2000), pp. 462–472. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (40)
78 K.A. Metcalfe, M.J. Esplen, V. Goel and S.A. Narod, Psychosocial functioning in women who have undergone bilateral prophylactic mastectomy, Psychooncology 13 (2004), pp. 14–25. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (28)
79 M.B. Hatcher, L. Fallowfield and R. A'Hern, The psychosocial impact of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy: Prospective study using questionnaires and semistructured interviews, Br Med J 322 (2001), p. 76. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (61)
80 I.L. Wapnir and S.J. Anderson, Prognosis after ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence and locoregional recurrences in five National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project node-positive adjuvant breast cancer trials, J Clin Oncol 24 (2006), pp. 2028–2037. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (44)
81 P. Zhou, S. Gautam and A. Recht, Factors affecting outcome for young women with early stage breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy, Breast Cancer Res Treat 101 (2007), pp. 51–57. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (11)
82 A.C. Voogd, M. Nielsen and J.L. Peterse et al., Differences in risk factors for local and distant recurrence after breast conserving therapy or mastectomy for Stage I and Stage II breast cancer: pooled results of two large European randomized trials, J Clin Oncol 19 (2001), pp. 1688–1697. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (158)
83 G.H. de Bock, J.A. van der Hage and H. Putter et al., Isolated loco-regional recurrences of breast cancer is more common in young patients and following breast conserving therapy: long-term results of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer studies, Eur J Cancer 42 (2006), pp. 351–356. Article | PDF (120 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (20)
84 K.J. Van Zee, L. Liberman and B. Samli et al., Long-term follow-up of women with ductal carcinoma in situ treated with breast-conserving surgery, Cancer 86 (1999), pp. 1757–1767. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (68)
85 M. van der Leest, L. Evers and M.J.C. van der Sangen et al., The safety of breast-conserving therapy in patients with breast cancer aged ≤40 years, Cancer 109 (2007), pp. 1957–1964. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (6)
86 C. Seynaeve, L.M. Van Den Bosch and C.T. Brekelmans et al., Local recurrence following lumpectomy and irradiation in familial and hereditary vs. sporadic breast cancer patients [abstract], Proc ASCO 17 (1998), p. 119a.
87 V.G. Vogel, J.P. Costantino and D.L. Wickerham et al., Effects of tamoxifen versus raloxifene on the risk of developing invasive breast cancer and other disease outcomes: the NSABP Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene(STAR) P-2 trial, JAMA 295 (2006), pp. 2727–2741. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (340)
88 V.C. Jordan, Chemoprevention of breast cancer with selective oestrogen-receptor modulators, Nat Rev Cancer 7 (2007), pp. 46–53. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (27)
89 R. Jackesz, H. Hausmaninger and E. Kubista et al., Randomized adjuvant trial of tamoxifen and goserelin versus cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil: evidence for the superiority of treatment with endocrine blockade in premenopausal women with hormone-responsive breast cancer-Austrian Breast and Colorectal Study Group Trial 5, J Clin Oncol 20 (2002), pp. 4621–4627.
90 M. Gnant, R. Greil and E. Kubista et al., The impact of treatment-induced amenorrhea on survival of premenopausal patients with endocrine-responsive breast cancer: 10-year results of ABCSG-05 (CMF vs. goserelin+tamoxifen): Abstract 17, Breast Cancer Res Treat 100 (2006), p. S11.
91 A.H. Boekhout, J.H. Beijnen and J.H.M. Schellens, Symptoms and treatment of cancer-therapy induced early menopause, Oncologist 11 (2006), pp. 641–654. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (13)
92 M.T. Knobf, The influence of endocrine effects of adjuvant therapy on quality of life outcomes in the young breast cancer survivor, Oncologist 11 (2006), pp. 96–110. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (26)
93 C.A. Cullinane, J. Lubinski and S.L. Neuhausen et al., Effect of pregnancy as a risk factor for breast cancer in BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers, Int J Cancer 117 (2005), pp. 988–991. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (40)
94 H. Jernstrom, C. Lerman and P. Ghadirian et al., Pregnancy and the risk of early breast cancer in carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2, Lancet Oncol 354 (1999), pp. 1846–1850. Article | PDF (78 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (119)
95 D.T. Janerich and M.B. Hoff, Evidence for cross-over in breast cancer risk factors, Am J Epidemiol 116 (1982), pp. 737–742. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (46)
96 S. Loibl, G. von Minckwitz and K. Gwyn et al., Breast carcinoma during pregnancy: International recommendations from an expert meeting, Cancer 106 (2006), pp. 237–246. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (44)
97 L.P. Middleton, M. Amin and K. Gwyn et al., Breast carcinoma in pregnant women: assessment of clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical features, Cancer 98 (2005), pp. 1055–1060.
98 J.R. Daling, K.E. Malone and D.R. Doody et al., The relation of reproductive factors to mortality from breast cancer, Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11 (2002), pp. 235–241. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (32)
99 P. Schedin, Pregnancy-associated breast cancer and metastases, Nat Rev Cancer 6 (2006), pp. 281–291. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (33)
100 H. Kuerer, K. Gwyn, F.C. Ames and R. Theriault, Conservative surgery and chemotherapy for breast carcinoma during pregnancy, Surgery 131 (2002), pp. 108–110. Article | PDF (39 K) | Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (26)
101 F. Amersi and N.M. Hansen, The benefits and limitations of sentinel node biopsy, Curr Treat Options Oncol 7 (2006), pp. 141–151. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (14)
102 M.M. Mondi, R.E. Cuenca and D.W. Ollila et al., Sentinel lymph node biopsy during pregnancy: initial clinical experience, Ann Surg Oncol 14 (2007), pp. 218–221. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (10)
103 D.L. Berry, R.L. Theriault and F.A. Holmes et al., Management of breast cancer during pregnancy using a standardized protocol, J Clin Oncol 17 (1999), pp. 855–861. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (146)
104 M.E.K. Hahn, P.H. Johnson and N. Gordon et al., Treatment of pregnant breast cancer patients and outcomes of children exposed to chemotherapy in utero, Cancer 107 (2006), pp. 1219–1226.
105 B.F. Hankey, B. Miller, R. Curtis and C. Kosary, Trends in breast cancer in younger women in contrast o older women, J Nat; Cancer Inst Monogr 16 (1994), pp. 7–14. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (77)
106 E. Von Shultz, H. Johansson, N. Wilking and L.E. Rutqvist, Influence of prior and subsequent pregnancy on breast cancer prognosis, J Clin Oncol 13 (1995), pp. 430–434.
107 K. Calhoun and N. Hansen, The effect of pregnancy on survival in women with a history of breast cancer, Breast Dis 23 (2005−2006), pp. 81–86.
108 S. Geller, A.S. Coates and A. Goldhirsch et al., Effect of pregnancy on overall survival after the diagnosis of early-stage breast cancer, J Clin Oncol 19 (2001), pp. 1671–1675.
109 S. Shousha, Breast carcinoma presenting during or shortly after pregnancy and lactation, Arch Pathol Lab Med 124 (2000), pp. 1053–1060. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (26)
110 M. Mahue-Giangreco, G. Ursin, J. Sullivan-Halley and L. Bernstein, Induced abortion, miscarriage, and breast cancer risk of young women, Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 12 (2003), pp. 209–214. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (14)
111 M. Sonmezer and K. Oktay, Fertility preservation in young women undergoing breast cancer therapy, Oncologist 11 (2006), pp. 422–434. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (40)
112 D.H. Baucom, L.S. Porter and J.S. Kirby et al., Psychosocial issues confronting young women with breast cancer, Breast Dis 23 (2005−2006), pp. 103–113.
113 P. Fobair, S.L. Stewart and S. Chang et al., Body image and sexual problems in young women with breast cancer, Psychooncology 15 (2006), pp. 579–594. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (36)
114 T.M. Kolb, J. Lichy and J.H. Newhouse, Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical exam, and breast ultrasound, and analysis of features that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations, Radiology 225 (2002), pp. 165–175. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (296)
  相似文献   

14.
15.
16.
Breast Cancer in Older Women   总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1  
Abstract: Breast cancer remains the most common malignancy and the leading cause of cancer death in women of all ages. The American Cancer Society has estimated that 180,200 women will develop breast cancer in the United States in 1997 and 43,900 will die from the disease (1). Age is an important variable affecting both breast cancer biology and management. The risk of developing breast cancer increases with age. Feuer et al., using data from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program, have estimated that the cumulative probability of developing invasive breast cancer from birth, which is less than 0.5% at the age of 40, increases approximately 20-fold for those women that reach the age of 95 years (2). As the duration of life continues to increase in the western world, the percentage of older women who have breast cancer will also increase. It is estimated that by the end of the 20th century more than 50% of all new cases of breast cancer will occur in women aged 65 years or older (3). Despite this high prevalence of disease, there is a great lack of definitive information about outcome from breast cancer in this segment of the population. Patients over the age of 65 years have frequently been excluded from large prospective randomized clinical trials, and as a consequence, no clear practice guidelines about the optimal management of these patients have been released. Many studies have indicated that elderly women with breast cancer are more likely to receive less aggressive treatment when compared to their younger counterparts (4–6). This lesser treatment has stemmed from several widely held assumptions: that older women (a) have less aggressive breast cancers, (b) have a greater likelihood of presenting with more advanced disease, (c) have a life expectancy so limited not to justify the use of standard treatment, and (d) are poor candidates for surgery more extensive than biopsy and for adjuvant treatments. Evidence to support these assumptions remains controversial. This article will provide an overview of available data on the main unresolved issues, including biology, screening, local treatment, and adjuvant therapy, and will try to indicate practice guidelines for the management of elderly women based on the current knowledge.  相似文献   

17.
Background: Somatostatin receptors are present in most human breast cancers. We performed a pilot trial of intraoperative tumor-gamma detection using the radiolabeled somatostatin analog 125I-lanreotide in 13 women with 14 primary breast carcinomas.Methods: All patients were given125I-lanreotide intravenously before surgery. Patients underwent lumpectomy, and postresection margins were evaluated with the gamma probe. Axillary dissection specimens were evaluated ex vivo.Results: Seven of 13 women had gamma probe-positive or clinically suspicious margins reexcised at the time of lumpectomy. Four of six probe-positive margins were histologically positive, and two of six probe-positive margins were histologically negative; a single clinically suspicious margin was histologically positive. A total of 270 axillary lymph nodes were evaluated ex vivo by gamma probe and histology. McNemars contingency tests demonstrated a highly statistical correlation between histology and gamma probe counts (P < .0001).Conclusions: The overall accuracy of nodal evaluation with125I-lanreotide/intraoperative gamma detection was 77%; the negative predictive value of this technique was 97%, however. This technique predicted the presence of tumor in 20% of axillary lymph nodes that were negative by routine histology. This technique appears safe and is able to detect positive tumor resection margins and accurately predict axillary lymph node negativity. Further trials of this technique are required to validate its utility.  相似文献   

18.
Abstract: Immediate and early‐delayed breast reconstruction are the preferred methods of reconstruction in breast cancer patients treated with mastectomy. These options for reconstruction allow for superior outcomes through peri‐operative planning between the oncologic surgeon and reconstructive team. We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to study the overall survival of patients treated with immediate or early‐delayed breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Population level de‐identified data was abstracted from the National Cancer Institute’s SEER cancer database. We obtained data for all female patients with breast cancer treated with mastectomy from 2000 to 2002. Patients with missing or incomplete data were excluded. Univariate and multivariate statistics were performed using Intercooled Stata 7.0 (College Station, TX). A total of 51,702 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 60.8 (range 20–104) years old. Reconstruction was performed in 16.7% of patients. Multivariate analysis showed that patients treated with mastectomy and reconstruction had a significantly lower hazard ratio of death (HR = 0.62, p < 0.001) compared with patients treated with mastectomy only, when controlling for demographic and oncologic covariates. Black patients comprised 7.5% of the total population, and multivariate analysis showed that black patients had a significantly increased hazard ratio of death (HR = 1.43, p < 0.001) when compared with white patients, when controlling for all other covariates including reconstruction status. We show that women with breast cancer who undergo breast reconstruction after mastectomy do not have a worse overall survival than those not undergoing breast reconstruction. This is true when patient age, race, income, and marital status; and tumor stage, histology, grade, use of radiotherapy, and mastectomy site (bilateral or unilateral) are controlled for.  相似文献   

19.
Background: Fertility drug therapy (FDT) induces supraphysiologic endogenous estrogen production and might transiently increase breast cancer risk. Tumors developing following FDT exposure have not been extensively studied.Methods: Thirty-eight breast cancer patients with 40 primary tumors and with history of FDT exposure were identified and compared with two other breast cancer groups: women with pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC, 22 patients with 23 tumors) and premenopausal women born during same calendar years and not exposed to hormonal manipulations or recent pregnancy (controls, 192 patients with 201 tumors). Patients were diagnosed and treated mostly during the last decade.Results: Compared with controls, tumors of patients with FDT exposure presented at advanced stages (P < .005), were more likely to be estrogen or progesterone receptor negative (P < .03) and of poor histology grade (P <.0002). Aggressive features predominated among women diagnosed within 2 years of an FDT cycle (P <.05). FDT and PABC groups shared similarities. With a median follow-up of 43 months, relapse-free and cancer-free survival rates were significantly reduced in the FDT and PABC groups (P < .01 and P < .01, respectively). Multivariate analysis revealed only treatment-defined tumor stage (operable, locally advanced, or metastatic) as predictive of survival (P < .0001).Conclusion: Breast tumors in women with recent FDT exposure present with poor prognostic features and share similarities with PABC. Survival is stage dependent.  相似文献   

20.
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司    京ICP备09084417号

京公网安备 11010802026262号