Vertical versus planar induction in amphibian early development

In the Urodeles, the archenteron roof invaginates as a single continuous sheet of cells, vertically inducing the neural anlage in the overlying ectoderm during invagination. The induction comprises first the activation process, leading, to forebrain differentiation tendencies, and then the superimposed transformation process, which changes presumptive forebrain development into that of hindbrain and spinal cord acting with a caudally increasing intensity. The activating action, being maximal anteriorly, decreases caudally to nearly zero. In the double-layered Xenopus embryo, the internal mesodermal marginal zone shows much more independent and earlier regional segregation and involution than the external marginal zone in the Urodeles; its prechordal mesoderm already initiating vertical neural induction in overlying ectoderm at stages 10 to 10⁺ before any visible archenteron invagination. In Xenopus incomplete exogastrulae the prechordal mesoderm involutes normally prior to evagination of the endoderm and mesodem. Artificially produced Xenopus total exogastrulae, made at stage 9 before mesoderm involution, behave just like axolotl total exogastrulae, showing no neural differentiation. The notion of planar neural induction in Xenopus can only be applied in exogastrulae and Keller explants for the transforming action, which is maximal in the caudal archenteron roof. In normal Xenopus development, the formation of the entire nervous system is essentially due to vertical induction by the successively involuting prechordal and notochordal mesoderm. The different behavior of Xenopus embryos in comparison with Urodele embryos can essentially be explained by the double-layered character of the animal moiety of the Xenopus embryo.     

BRAIN INDUCTION IN VARIOUSLY AGED PRESUMPTIVE ECTODERMS BY HEAD ORGANIZER IN CYNOPS PYRRHOGASTER

Brain formation in variously aged presumptive ectoderms of Cynops pyrrhogaster under the influence of the head organizer was examined by the sandwich method. The head organizer was obtained from the middle portion of the archenteron roof at the slit-blastopore stage. The presumptive ectoderm was taken from 0- to 36-hr exogastrulae. Exogastrulae were prepared from the earliest gastrulae just before invagination (0-hr embryos). The presumptive neural plate overlying the archenteron roof used as organizer was cultivated in an envelope of belly ectoderm from an early neurula.
The following results were obtained: 1) Brain induction was almost entirely restricted to explants covered with 6-hr ectoderm and its frequency was low. 2) The presumptive neural plate above the head organizer was almost completely determined as neural tissues. 3) The head organizer showed a tendency to differentiate into more endodermal and less mesodermal tissues than those expected from its prospective fate.
Brain induction in normal development and the relationship between neural tissue formation in variously aged presumptive ectoderms and the time necessary for neural induction are discussed.     

The neural induction process; its morphogenetic aspects

This posthumous review of early embryonic inductions concludes: 1) the amphibian egg has only two distinct components, animal and vegetal. Interactions at their mutual boundary forms meso-endoderm. This is "meso-endoderm induction", not just "mesoderm induction". 2) The dorso-ventral polarity of the yolk mass implies a dorsally situated inducing centre. 3) Accumulation of cells into one, two, three or many cell masses [problastopores] along the circumference of the meso-endoderm results in as many axes, implying a self-organizing capacity of meso-endoderm. 4) Induction of the meso-endoderm is slow, spreading cell to cell through the animal moiety from the boundary of the vegetal yolk mass towards the animal pole. 5) Interaction between mesoderm and ectoderm is a separate step leading to cranio-caudal differentiation of the archenteron roof. 6) The initial invaginating endoderm and mesoderm, representing the future pharynx endoderm and prechordal plate mesoderm, first contacts the most posterior presumptive neurectoderm after having passed the still uninvaginated trunk mesoderm. At that moment an antero-posterior level neural induction actually starts. 7) The ectoderm contraction wave coincides spatially and temporally with the induced neural plate. 8) Two successive homoiogenetic waves of inductive activity pass through the presumptive neurectoderm in the anterior direction, the first one, "activation", giving rise to neural differentiation and ultimately forebrain, the second one, "transformation", to more caudal CNS structures. These are separate, successive steps in CNS regional induction. 9) The midbrain represents a secondary formation in the neural plate. 10) The observed changes in morphogenesis may depend upon separate, successive binary decisions via [cell and] nuclear state splitters [involving differentiation waves].     

Specification of pharyngeal endoderm is dependent on early signals from axial mesoderm.

The development of taste buds is an autonomous property of the pharyngeal endoderm, and this inherent capacity is acquired by the time gastrulation is complete. These results are surprising, given the general view that taste bud development is nerve dependent, and occurs at the end of embryogenesis. The pharyngeal endoderm sits at the dorsal lip of the blastopore at the onset of gastrulation, and because this taste bud-bearing endoderm is specified to make taste buds by the end of gastrulation, signals that this tissue encounters during gastrulation might be responsible for its specification. To test this idea, tissue contacts during gastrulation were manipulated systematically in axolotl embryos, and the subsequent ability of the pharyngeal endoderm to generate taste buds was assessed. Disruption of both putative planar and vertical signals from neurectoderm failed to prevent the differentiation of taste buds in endoderm. However, manipulations of contact between presumptive pharyngeal endoderm and axial mesoderm during gastrulation indicate that signals from axial mesoderm (the notochord and prechordal mesoderm) specify the pharyngeal endoderm, conferring upon the endoderm the ability to autonomously differentiate taste buds. These findings further emphasize that despite the late differentiation of taste buds, the tissue-intrinsic mechanisms that generate these chemoreceptive organs are set in motion very early in embryonic development.     

Studies on the Formation and State of Determination of the Trunk Organizer in the Newt, Cynops Pyrrhogaster III. Tangential Induction in the Dorsal Marginal Zone

Analysis of the course of differentiation of combinants between the presumptive prechordal plate (PcP) and presumptive ectoderm (PE) by time-lapse filming showed that the PcP of early gastrulae has the capacity to induce mesoderm (notochord, muscle cells and migrating cells) in the PE. The mesoderm-inducing capacity of the PcP decreases sharply during gastrulation. Following invagination in the mid-gastrula, the PcP completely loses its mesoderm-inducing capacity. This change also occurred when the PcP of the earliest gastrula was aged in vitro for 18 hr. This shows that the mesoderm-inducing capacity of the PcP decreases autonomously with aging.
PE transplanted into the presumptive trunk organizer region of the dorsal marginal zone of the earlist gastrula, became mesodermized within 12 hr. It is clear that this mesodermization of the transplanted PE is due to "tangential induction" from the PcP. The stepwise formation of the trunk organizer in Cynops pyrrhogaster is discussed in consideration of these results.     

The pitx2 homeobox protein is required early for endoderm formation and nodal signaling.

Nodal and Nodal-related factors play fundamental roles in a number of developmental processes, including mesoderm and endoderm formation, patterning of the anterior neural plate, and determination of bilateral asymmetry in vertebrates. pitx2, a paired-like homeobox gene, has been proposed to act downstream of Nodal in the gene cascade providing left-right cues to the developing organs. Here, we report that pitx2 is required early in the Nodal signaling pathway for specification of the endodermal and mesodermal germ layers. We found that pitx2 is expressed very early during Xenopus and zebrafish development and in many regions where Nodal signaling is required, including the presumptive mesoderm and endoderm at the blastula and gastrula stages and the prechordal mesoderm at later stages. In Xenopus embryos, overexpression of pitx2 caused ectopic expression of goosecoid and sox-17 and interfered with mesoderm formation. Overexpression of pitx2 in Xenopus animal cap explants partially mimics the effects of Nodal overexpression, suggesting that pitx2 is a mediator of Nodal signaling during specification of the endoderm and prechordal plate, but not during mesoderm induction. We further demonstrate that pitx2 is induced by Nodal signaling in Xenopus animal caps and that the early expression of zebrafish pitx2 is absent when the Nodal signaling pathway is inactive. Inhibition of pitx2 function using a chimeric EnR-pitx2 blocked specification of the mesoderm and endoderm and caused severe embryonic defects resembling those seen when Nodal signaling is inhibited. Following inhibition of pitx2 function, the fate of ventral vegetal blastomeres was shifted from an endodermal to a more mesodermal fate, an effect that was reversed by wild-type pitx2. Finally, we show that inhibition of pitx2 function interferes with the response of cells to Nodal signaling. Our results provide direct evidence that pitx2 function is required for normal specification of the endodermal and mesodermal germ layers.     

Vertebrate head induction by anterior primitive endoderm

In vertebrates the antero-posterior organization of the embryonic body axis is thought to result from the activity of two separate centers, the head organizer and the trunk organizer, as operationally defined by Spemann in the 1920s. Current molecular studies have supported the existence of a trunk organizer activity while the presence of a distinct head inducing center has remained elusive. Mainly based on analyses of headless mutants in mice, it has been proposed that the anterior axial mesoderm plays a determining role in head induction. Recent gain- and loss-of-function studies in various organisms, however, provide compelling evidence that a largely ignored region, the anterior primitive endoderm, specifies rostral identity. In this review we discuss the emerging concept that the anterior primitive endoderm, rather than the prechordal plate mesoderm, induces head development in the vertebrate embryo.     

Developmental Morphology of the Head Mesoderm and Reevaluation of Segmental Theories of the Vertebrate Head: Evidence from Embryos of an Agnathan Vertebrate, Lampetra japonica

Due to the peculiar morphology of its preotic head, lampreys have long been treated as an intermediate animal which links amphioxus and gnathostomes. To reevaluate the segmental theory of classical comparative embryology, mesodermal development was observed in embryos of a lamprey, Lampetra japonica, by scanning electron microscopy and immunohistochemistry. Signs of segmentation are visible in future postotic somites at an early neurula stage, whereas the rostral mesoderm is unsegmented and rostromedially confluent with the prechordal plate. The premandibular and mandibular mesoderm develop from the prechordal plate in a caudal to rostral direction and can be called the preaxial mesoderm as opposed to the caudally developing gastral mesoderm. With the exception of the premandibular mesoderm, the head mesodermal sheet is secondarily regionalized by the otocyst and pharyngeal pouches into the mandibular mesoderm, hyoid mesoderm, and somite 0. The head mesodermal components never develop into cephalic myotomes, but the latter develop only from postotic somites. These results show that the lamprey embryo shows a typical vertebrate phylotype and that the basic mesodermal configuration of vertebrates already existed prior to the split of agnatha-gnathostomata; lamprey does not represent an intermediate state between amphioxus and gnathostomes. Unlike interpretations of theories of head segmentation that the mesodermal segments are primarily equivalent along the axis, there is no evidence in vertebrate embryos for the presence of preotic myotomes. We conclude that mesomere-based theories of head metamerism are inappropriate and that the formulated vertebrate head should possess the distinction between primarily unsegmented head mesoderm which includes preaxial components at least in part and somites in the trunk which are shared in all the known vertebrate embryos as the vertebrate phylotype.     

Germ Layer Interactions in Pattern Formation of Amphibian Mesoderm during Primary Embryonic Induction

Mesodermal differentiation of dorsal marginal zone (DMZ) before and after invagination was analyzed by a series of combination experiments with different kinds of ectoderm.
Lower DMZ of early gastrula didn't show any axial-mesoderm (notochord and somitic mesoderm) but lateral mesoderm (mesenchyme, mesothelium, or blood cells) in combinant with non-competent ventral ectoderm, while combinant with competent ectoderm was found to have well-differentiated axial-mesoderm with deutero-spinocaudal neurals. The axial-mesoderms have origin in the ectoderm. Uninvaginated DMZ of middle gastrula also showed difference in mesodermal differentiation between competent and non-competent ectoderms; axial-mesoderm differentiation was much better in competent than in non-competent. The axial-mesoderm originated from the uninvaginated DMZ. Archenteron roof of late gastrula showed regional difference in mesodermal differentiation in both combinants with competent and non-competent. The present study further demonstrated that there was regionality in promoting effect of induced neurectoderm on axial-mesoderm differentiation of invaginated archenteron roof.
The present experiments suggest that the cranio-caudal and dorso-ventral axis formations of amphibian mesoderm are finally determined by sequential and reciprocal interactions between the mesodermal anlage and the overlying ectoderm. It should be also shown that lower DMZ acts to trigger a series of the sequential interactions during primary embryonic induction.     

Spatially distinct head and heart inducers within the Xenopus organizer region.

BACKGROUND: The mouse anterior visceral endoderm, an extraembryonic tissue, expresses several genes essential for normal development of structures rostral to the anterior limit of the notochord and has been termed the head organizer. This tissue also has heart-inducing activity and expresses mCer1 which, like its Xenopus homolog cerberus, can induce markers of cardiac specification and anterior neural tissue when ectopically expressed. We investigated the relationship between head and heart induction in Xenopus embryos, which lack extraembryonic tissues. RESULTS: We found three regions of gene expression in the Xenopus organizer: deep endoderm, which expressed cerberus; prechordal mesoderm, which showed overlapping but non-identical expression of genes characteristic of the murine head organizer, such as XHex and XANF-1; and leading-edge dorsoanterior endoderm, which expressed both cerberus and a subset of the genes expressed by the prechordal mesoderm. Microsurgical ablation of the cerberus-expressing endoderm decreased the incidence of heart, but not head, formation. Removal of prechordal mesoderm, in contrast, caused deficits of anterior head structures. Finally, although misexpression of cerberus induced ectopic heads, it was unable to induce genes thought to participate in head induction. CONCLUSIONS: In Xenopus, the cerberus-expressing endoderm is required for heart, but not head, inducing activity. Therefore, this tissue is not the topological equivalent of the murine anterior visceral endoderm. We propose that, in Xenopus, cerberus is redundant to other bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) and Wnt antagonists located in prechordal mesoderm for head induction, but may be necessary for heart induction.     

INDUCING TIME FOR NEURAL TISSUES IN GASTRULA ECTODERM OF CYNOPS PYRRHOGASTER

The inducing times for spinal cord and deuterencephalon in Cynops gastrula were determined by the sandwich method. The extreme posterior of the archenteron roof at the slit-blastopore stage (tail organizer) was used as an inducer. First, the presumptive ectoderm of the earliest gastrula (0-hr stage) was put in contact with the organizer for 6 to 24 hr. Spinal cord and deuterencephalon were induced in almost all explants after 24 and 21 hr of contact, respectively, indicating that 24 hr is enough time for differentiations of both spinal cord and deuterencephalon. Next, presumptive ectoderm of 6- to 21-hr exogastrulae was put in contact with the organizer until the 24-hr stage. Results showed that the net inducing times for spinal cord and deuterencephalon were 18 and 15 hr, respectively, and that neural competence appeared in the presumptive ectoderm at the 6-hr stage (straight-blastopore stage).     

Expression patterns of fork head and goosecoid homologues in the mollusc Patella vulgata supports the ancestry of the anterior mesendoderm across Bilateria

We have characterised orthologues of the genes fork head and goosecoid in the gastropod Patella vulgata. In this species, the anterior-posterior (AP) axis is determined just before gastrulation, and leads to the specification of two mesodermal components on each side of the presumptive endoderm, one anterior (ectomesoderm), and one posterior (endomesoderm). Both fork head and goosecoid are expressed from the time the AP axis is specified, up to the end of gastrulation. fork head mRNA is detected in the whole endoderm, as well as in the anterior mesoderm, whereas goosecoid is only expressed anteriorly, in the three germ layers. The two genes are thus coexpressed in the anterior mesoderm, suggesting the latter's homology with vertebrate prechordal mesoderm. In addition, since prechordal plate is known to belong to an anterior, so called "head organiser", and since its inductive role is dependent on the function of the vertebrate fork head and goosecoid orthologues, we further suggest that the anterior mesoderm may also have a role in anterior inductive patterning in Spiralia. Finally, we propose that a mode of axial development involving two organisers, one anterior and one posterior, is ancestral to the Bilateria, and that both organisers evolved from the single head organiser of a putative hydra-like ancestor.     

The organizer of the mouse gastrula is composed of a dynamic population of progenitor cells for the axial mesoderm

An organizer population has been identified in the anterior end of the primitive streak of the mid-streak stage embryo, by the expression of Hnf3beta, Gsc(lacZ) and Chrd, and the ability of these cells to induce a second neural axis in the host embryo. This cell population can therefore be regarded as the mid-gastrula organizer and, together with the early-gastrula organizer and the node, constitute the organizer of the mouse embryo at successive stages of development. The profile of genetic activity and the tissue contribution by cells in the organizer change during gastrulation, suggesting that the organizer may be populated by a succession of cell populations with different fates. Fine mapping of the epiblast in the posterior region of the early-streak stage embryo reveals that although the early-gastrula organizer contains cells that give rise to the axial mesoderm, the bulk of the progenitors of the head process and the notochord are localized outside the early gastrula organizer. In the mid-gastrula organizer, early gastrula organizer derived cells that are fated for the prechordal mesoderm are joined by the progenitors of the head process that are recruited from the epiblast previously anterior to the early gastrula organizer. Cells that are fated for the head process move anteriorly from the mid-gastrula organizer in a tight column along the midline of the embryo. Other mid-gastrula organizer cells join the expanding mesodermal layer and colonize the cranial and heart mesoderm. Progenitors of the trunk notochord that are localized in the anterior primitive streak of the mid-streak stage embryo are later incorporated into the node. The gastrula organizer is therefore composed of a constantly changing population of cells that are allocated to different parts of the axial mesoderm.     

Hensen's node gives rise to the ventral midline of the foregut: implications for organizing head and heart development

Patterning of the ventral head has been attributed to various cell populations, including endoderm, mesoderm, and neural crest. Here, we provide evidence that head and heart development may be influenced by a ventral midline endodermal cell population. We show that the ventral midline endoderm of the foregut is generated directly from the extreme rostral portion of Hensen's node, the avian equivalent of the Spemann organizer. The endodermal cells extend caudally in the ventral midline from the prechordal plate during development of the foregut pocket. Thus, the prechordal plate appears as a mesendodermal pivot between the notochord and the ventral foregut midline. The elongating ventral midline endoderm delimits the right and left sides of the ventral foregut endoderm. Cells derived from the midline endoderm are incorporated into the endocardium and myocardium during closure of the foregut pocket and fusion of the bilateral heart primordia. Bilateral ablation of the endoderm flanking the midline at the level of the anterior intestinal portal leads to randomization of heart looping, suggesting that this endoderm is partitioned into right and left domains by the midline endoderm, thus performing a function similar to that of the notochord in maintaining left-right asymmetry. Because of its derivation from the dorsal organizer, its extent from the forebrain through the midline of the developing face and pharynx, and its participation in formation of a single midline heart tube, we propose that the ventral midline endoderm is ideally situated to function as a ventral organizer of the head and heart.     

革胡子鲇卵巢在第一次性周期内分化与发育的研究

用光镜和电镜研究了革胡子鲇（Ｃｌａｒｉａｓｌａｚｅｒａ）原生殖细胞的起源迁移,卵巢在第１次性周期内的分化与发育以及各发育时期卵母细胞的超微结构。原生殖细胞起源于内胚层,有固定的迁移路线,进入生殖嵴后,生殖嵴进一步分化,出现卵巢腔分化成卵巢,卵母细胞在第１次性周期内的发育可分成６个时相,描述了各时相卵母细胞的显微结构与超微结构。同时,叙述了卵母细胞中卵黄发生的形态形成。     

EFFECT OF AGING ON NEURAL COMPETENCE OF PRESUMPTIVE ECTODERM, AND EFFECT OF AGED ECTODERM ON DIFFERENTIATION OF THE ORGANIZER IN CYNOPS PYRRHOGASTER II. ROLE OF EXTREME POSTERIOR OF THE ARCHENTERIC ROOF IN THE SLIT-BLASTOPORE STAGE IN NORMAL DEVELOPMENT

The effect of aging on the neural competence of the presumptive ectoderm in gastrulae of Cynops pyrrhogaster and the effect of aged ectoderm on differentiation of the extreme posterior of the archenteric roof in the slit-blastopore stage were examined by a sandwich method in which this organizer was wrapped in the presumptive ectoderm taken from the 0- to 42-hr aged exogastrulae. Vital staining showed that this organizer becomes mainly tail notochord. Therefore it should be called tail or trunk-tail organizer. In 0- to 18-hr explants, typical trunk-tail structures were formed. With further aging of the presumptive ectoderm, a decrease of spinal cord and muscle with a concomitant increase of mesenchyme and mesothelium was observed. In 36- (corresponding to the slit-blastopore-initial neural stage) and 42-hr explants, neural competence had disappeared markedly. The notochord appeared in all explants, indicating this organizer is more firmly determined than the uninvaginated dorsal lip in small yolk-plug stage. Conclusively, this organizer does not play an important role in the induction of the neural plate, but induces the tail in normal development.