Immunohistochemistry and microsatellite instability testing for selecting MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 mutation carriers in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer

Hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) represents 1-3% of all colorectal cancers. HNPCC is caused by a constitutional defect in a mismatch repair (MMR) gene, most commonly affecting the genes MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6. The MMR defect results in an increased cancer risk, with the greatest lifetime risk for colorectal cancer and other cancers associated to HNPCC. The HNPCC-associated tumor phenotype is generally characterized by microsatellite instability (MSI) and immunohistochemical loss of expression of the affected MMR protein. The aim of this study was to determine the sensitivity of IHC for MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6, and MSI analysis in tumors from known MMR gene mutation carriers. Fifty-eight paired normal and tumor samples from HNPCC families enrolled in our high-risk colorectal cancer registry were studied for the presence of germline mutations in MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 by DGGE and direct sequencing. MSI analysis and immunostaining for MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 were evaluated. Of the 28 patients with a real pathogenic mutation, loss of immunohistochemical expression for at least 1 of these MMR proteins was found, and all except 1 have MSI-H. Sensitivity by MSI analysis was 96%. IHC analysis had a sensitivity of 100% in detecting MMR deficiency in carriers of a pathogenic MMR mutation, and can be used to predict which gene is expected to harbor the mutation for MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6. This study suggests that both analyses are useful for selecting high-risk patients because most MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 gene carriers will be detected by this 2-step approach. This practical method should have immediate application in the clinical work of patients with inherited colorectal cancer syndromes.     

The added value of PMS2 immunostaining in the diagnosis of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer

Identification and characterization of the genetic background in patients with the hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) syndrome is important since control programmes can in a cost-effective manner prevent cancer development in high-risk individuals. HNPCC is caused by germline mismatch repair (MMR) gene mutations and the genetic analysis of HNPCC therefore includes assessment of microsatellite instability (MSI) and immunohistochemical MMR protein expression in the tumor tissue. MSI is found in >95% of the HNPCC-associated tumors and immunostaining using antibodies against the MMR proteins MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 has been found to correctly pinpoint the affected gene in about 90% of the cases. The PMS2 antibody was the most recently developed and we have in a clinical material assessed the added value of PMS2 immunostaining in 213 patients with suspected hereditary colorectal cancer. All 119 MSS tumors showed retained expression for all four antibodies and PMS2 did thus not identify any underlying MMR defect in these cases. However, PMS2 immunostaining contributed to the characterization of the MMR defect in a subset of the MSI tumors. Concomitant loss of MLH1 and PMS2, which functionally interact in the MutLα complex, was found in 98% of the tumors from patients with germline MLH1 mutations. Among the 12 MSI-high tumors with retained expression of MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6, 8 tumors showed loss of PMS2 staining, and mutations in MLH1 were identified in 2 and mutations in PMS2 in 3 of these individuals. In summary, isolated loss of PMS2 was found in 8% of the MSI-high tumors in our series, including 8/12 previously unexplained MSI-high tumors, in which mutations either in MLH1 or in PMS2 were identified in five cases.     

Screening for germline mutations of MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2 genes in Slovenian colorectal cancer patients: implications for a population specific detection strategy of Lynch syndrome

Microsatellite instability (MSI) is present in more than 90% of colorectal cancers of patients with Lynch syndrome, and is therefore a feasible marker for the disease. Mutations in MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2, which are one of the main causes of deficient mismatch repair and subsequent MSI, have been linked to the disease. In order to establish the role of each of the 4 genes in Slovenian Lynch syndrome patients, we performed MSI analysis on 593 unselected CRC patients and subsequently searched for the presence of point mutations, larger genomic rearrangements and MLH1 promoter hypermethylation in patients with MSI-high tumours. We detected 43 (7.3%) patients with MSI-H tumours, of which 7 patients (1.3%) harboured germline defects: 2 in MLH1, 4 in MSH2, 1 in PMS2 and none in MSH6. Twenty-nine germline sequence variations of unknown significance and 17 deleterious somatic mutations were found. MLH1 promoter methylation was detected in 56% of patients without detected germline defects and in 1 (14%) suspected Lynch syndrome. Due to the minor role of germline MSH6 mutations, we adapted the Lynch syndrome detection strategy for the Slovenian population of CRC patients, whereby germline alterations should be first sought in MLH1 and MSH2 followed by a search for larger genomic rearrangements in these two genes. When no germline mutations are found tumors should be further tested for the presence of germline defects in PMS2 and MSH6. The choice about which gene should be tested first can be guided more accurately by the immunohistochemical analysis. Our study demonstrates that the incidence of MMR mutations in a population should be known prior to the application of one of several suggested strategies for detection of Lynch syndrome.     

Altered expression of MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 in predisposition to hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: A considerable fraction (30% to 70%) of families with verified or putative hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer fails to show mutations in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) genes. Our purpose was to address the genetic etiology of such families. Materials and METHODS: We scrutinized a population-based cohort of 26 families from Finland that had screened mutation-negative by previous techniques. Blood was tested for allelic messenger RNA (mRNA) expression of MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 by single nucleotide primer extension (SNuPE), and tumor tissue for MMR protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) as well as for microsatellite instability (MSI). Full-length cDNAs of genes implicated by SNuPE or IHC were cloned and sequenced. RESULTS: Unbalanced mRNA expression of MLH1 alleles was evident in two families. An inherited nonsense mutation was subsequently identified in one family, and complete silencing of the mutated allele was identified in the other family. Extinct protein expression by IHC implicated MLH1 in these two and in four other families, MSH2 in four families, and MSH6 in one family. Although no unequivocal genomic mutations were detected in the latter families, haplotype and other findings provided support for heritable defects. With one exception, all tumors with IHC alterations showed MSI, in contrast to the remaining families, which showed neither IHC changes nor MSI. CONCLUSION: Our expression-based strategy stratified the present "mutation-negative" cohort into two discrete categories: families linked to the major MMR genes MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6 (11 [42%] of 26) and those likely to be associated with other, as yet unknown susceptibility genes (15 [58%] of 26).     

Evaluation of microsatellite instability and immunohistochemistry for the prediction of germ-line MSH2 and MLH1 mutations in hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer families

Forty-eight hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal carcinoma (HNPCC) families for which a tumor sample was available were evaluated for the presence of germ-line mutations in MSH2 and MLH1, tumor microsatellite instability (MSI), and where possible, expression of MSH2 and MLH1 in tumors by immunohistochemistry. Fourteen of 48 of the families had a germ-line mutation in either MSH2 or MLH1 that could be detected by genomic DNA sequencing, and 28 of 48 of the families had MSI-H tumors. Four additional families showed loss of expression of MSH2, and one additional family showed loss of expression of MLH1 but did not have germ-line mutations in MSH2 or MLH1 that could be detected by DNA sequencing. MSI-H, as defined using the National Cancer Institute recommended five-microsatellite panel, had a 100% sensitivity for identifying samples having MSH2 or MLH1 mutations or loss of expression. In contrast, loss of MSH2 and MLH1 expression did not identify all samples having germ-line mutations in MSH2 or MLH1, because in five cases, a mutant protein product was expressed that could be detected by IHC. A combination of the Bethesda criteria for HNPCC and an MSI-H phenotype defined the smallest number of cases having all of the germ-line MSH2 and MLH1 mutations that could be detected by DNA sequencing.     

Isolated loss of PMS2 expression in colorectal cancers: frequency, patient age, and familial aggregation.

PURPOSE: Most colorectal cancers that have high levels of microsatellite instability (MSI-H) show loss of immunohistochemical expression of proteins that participate in the DNA mismatch repair process, most often involving MLH1 and MSH2. Less commonly, a third DNA mismatch repair protein, MSH6, may also be lost as the primary event. Rarely, tumors with MSI-H show normal expression of these three proteins. The genetic deficiency leading to the MSI-H phenotype in such cases is unknown. PMS2 is another member of the DNA mismatch repair complex. Its expression is generally lost in tumors with MLH1 loss of expression. Rarely, there is selective loss of PMS2 expression. We sought to describe the frequency and clinical correlates of selective loss of expression of PMS2 with the MSI-H tumor phenotype. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Two thousand seven hundred nineteen colorectal cancers from both clinic- and research-based ascertainment were studied. Tumor MSI testing and immunohistochemistry for MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 were conducted. Medical records were abstracted for age at diagnosis, gender, colorectal cancer site, and family history. RESULTS: Five hundred thirty-five of the 2,719 tumors were MSI-H. Of these, 93% showed loss of expression of MLH1, MSH2, and/or MSH6. Thirty-eight showed normal expression for these proteins. PMS2 immunohistochemical staining was successful in 32 of 38 of these tumors. Of the 32, 23 showed selective loss of expression of PMS2. This was associated with young age of diagnosis and right-sided location but not with a striking family history of cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, 97% of the MSI-H tumors showed loss of expression for one or more of these four mismatch repair proteins. Selective loss of expression of PMS2 was present in 72% of cases in which colorectal cancers had an MSI-H phenotype but no alteration of expression of MLH1, MSH2, and MSH6. The underlying mechanism involved cannot be determined from this study but could involve point mutations in other DNA mismatch repair genes with retention of immunohistochemical expression, somatic inactivation of PMS2, or germ line mutation of PMS2.     

Genomic rearrangements in MSH2, MLH1 or MSH6 are rare in HNPCC patients carrying point mutations

Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) is an autosomal dominant disease with high penetrance, caused by germline mutations in the mismatch repair (MMR) genes MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2 and MLH3. Most reported pathogenic mutations are point mutations, comprising single base substitutions, small insertions and deletions. In addition, genomic rearrangements, such as large deletions and duplications not detectable by PCR and Sanger sequencing, have been identified in a significant proportion of HNPCC families, which do not carry a pathogenic MMR gene point mutation. To clarify whether genomic rearrangements in MLH1, MSH2 or MSH6 also occur in patients carrying a point mutation, we subjected normal tissue DNA of 137 colorectal cancer (CRC) patients to multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) analysis. Patients fulfilled the following pre-requisites: all patients met at least one criterion of the Bethesda guidelines and their tumors exhibited high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and/or showed loss of expression of MLH1, MSH2 or MSH6 proteins. PCR amplification and Sanger sequencing of all exons of at least one MMR gene, whose protein expression had been lost in the tumor tissue, identified 52 index patients without a point mutation (Group 1), 71 index patients with a pathogenic point mutation in MLH1 (n=38) or MSH2 (n=22) or MSH6 (n=11) (Group 2) and 14 patients with an unclassified variant in MLH1 (n=9) or MSH2 (n=3) or MSH6 (n=2) (Group 3). In 13 of 52 patients of group 1 deletions of at least one exon were identified. In addition, in group 3 one EX1_15del in MLH1 was found. No genomic rearrangement was identified in group 2 patients. Genomic rearrangements represent a significant proportion of pathogenic mutations of MMR genes in HNPCC patients. However, genomic rearrangements are rare in patients carrying point mutations in MMR genes. These findings suggest the use of genomic rearrangement tests in addition to Sanger sequencing in HNPCC patients.     

Microsatellite instability and expression of MLH1 and MSH2 in carcinomas of the small intestine

BACKGROUND: Carcinomas of the small intestine are rare, but the risk is greatly increased in patients with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) due to an inherited mismatch repair (MMR) gene mutation, most commonly affecting the genes MLH1 or MSH2. Defective MMR is characterized by microsatellite instability (MSI) and loss of MMR protein expression in the tumor tissue. However, a subset of several sporadic tumor types, including about 15% of colon cancers, also evolve through defective MMR. METHODS: The authors have assessed the frequency of MSI and analyzed the immunohistochemical expression of MLH1 and MSH2 in a population-based series of 89 adenocarcinomas of the small intestine. To study the contribution of MSI and defective MMR protein expression in young patients, 43 cancers of the small intestine from patients below age 60 years (including 24 tumors from the population-based series and an additional 19 tumors from young individuals) were also analyzed. RESULTS: MSI was detected in 16/89 tumors (18%) in the population-based series, and immunohistochemistry revealed loss of expression for MLH1 in 7/16 MSI tumors and in 2/73 MSS tumors, whereas all tumors showed normal expression for MSH2. Among the young patients, the authors identified MSI in 10/43 tumors (23%), and 6 of these 10 MSI tumors showed immunohistochemical loss of MMR protein expression, which affected MLH1 in 3 cases and MSH2 in 3 cases. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency of MSI (18%) in adenocarcinomas of the small intestine equals that of colon cancer. However, silencing of MLH1 seems to explain the MSI status in only about half of the MSI tumors. Among patients with cancer of the small intestine before age 60 years, MSI is found in 23% of the cases, with MLH1 and MSH2 being affected at equal frequencies, indicating that HNPCC may underly a subset of such cases.     

The role of MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 in the development of multiple colorectal cancers

There is increased incidence of microsatellite instability (MSI) in patients who develop multiple primary colorectal cancers (CRC), although the association with hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC) is unclear. This study aims to evaluate the underlying genetic cause of MSI in these patients. Microsatellite instability was investigated in 111 paraffin-embedded CRCs obtained from 78 patients with metachronous and synchronous cancers, and a control group consisting of 74 cancers from patients with a single CRC. Tumours were classified as high level (MSI-H), low level (MSI-L) or stable (MSS). MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 gene expression was measured by immunohistochemistry. Methylation of the MLH1 promoter region was evaluated in MSI-H cancers that failed to express MLH1, and mutational analysis performed in MSI-H samples that expressed MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 proteins. The frequency of MSI-H was significantly greater in the multiple, 58 out of 111 (52%), compared to the single cancers, 10 out of 74 (13.5%), P < 0.01. Of the 32 patients from whom two or more cancers were analysed, eight (25%) demonstrated MSI-H in both cancers, 13 (41%) demonstrated MSI-H in one cancer and 11 (34%) failed to demonstrate any MSI-H. MSI-H single cancers failed to express MLH1 or MSH2 in seven out of nine (78%) cases and MSI-L/MSS cancers failed to express MLH1 or MSH2 in one out of 45 (2.2%) cases, all cancers expressed MSH6. MSI-H multiple cancers failed to express MLH1 or MSH2 in 21 out of 43 (48%) cases and MSI-L/MSS cancers failed to express MLH1 or MSH2 in four out of 32 (12.5%) cases. MSH6 expression was lost in five MSI-H multiple cancers, four of which also failed to express MLH1 or MSH2. Loss of expression of the same mismatch repair (MMR) gene was identified in both cancers from six out of 19 (31%) patients. Methylation was identified in 11 out of 17 (65%) multiple and three out of six (50%) single MSI-H cancers that failed to express MLH1. Mutational analysis of 10 MSI-H multiple cancers that expressed MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 failed to demonstrate mutations in the MLH1 or MSH2 genes. We suggest that, although MSI-H is more commonly identified in those with multiple colorectal cancers, this does not commonly arise from a classical HNPCC pathway.     

免疫组织化学与聚合酶链反应在结肠癌微卫星状态筛选中的比较

目的 比较免疫组织化学（IHC）与聚合酶链反应（PCR）检测结肠癌微卫星不稳定状态的一致性,评价IHC检测微卫星不稳定状态的可行性。方法 采用IHC和PCR两种方法分别检测80例结肠癌中微卫星不稳定状态。结果 （1）IHC法检测结果显示癌旁正常黏膜中错配修复蛋白（包括MLH1、PMS2、MSH2、MSH6）均阳性表达。四个蛋白表达缺失率分别为23.8%（19/80）、21.2%（17/80）、7.5%（6/80）、3.7%（3/80）,其中有16例显示MLH1、PMS2表达同时缺失,3例显示MSH2和MSH6表达同时缺失。19例（23.8%）显示为高频微卫星不稳定,剩余病例显示微卫星稳定状态或低频微卫星不稳定;（2）PCR产物测序结果显示18例为高频微卫星不稳定,5例为低频微卫星不稳定,其余病例均为微卫星稳定状态;（3）两种方法具有高度一致性。结论 与PCR法相比,IHC具有操作简单、耗时短、费用低以及对实验仪器条件要求不高等优点,具有较高的临床应用价值,可以作为检测结肠癌微卫星不稳定状态的首选方法。     

Alterations in PMS2, MSH2 and MLH1 expression in human prostate cancer

DNA mismatch repair (MMR) is involved in the post-replication correction of errors due to misincorporated nucleotides or DNA slippage during DNA synthesis. We previously reported the reduction or loss of MMR protein expression in human prostate cancer cell lines and some primary tumors. In the present report, we further demonstrate the involvement of defects of MMR in the pathogenesis of prostate cancer. Immunohistochemical analysis of 39 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded human prostate tumors, showed reduction or absence of MMR protein expression (MLH1, MSH2, PMS2) in the epithelium of prostate tumor foci compared to normal adjacent prostate tissue. The reduction or absence of the PMS2 and MSH2 (but not MLH1) protein was correlated to the differentiation of the tumor. Poorly differentiated tumors showed greater loss of these two proteins than the well differentiated tumors (P<0.05). We previously reported that microsatellite instability was detectable by a beta-galactosidase restoration mutation assay in the prostate cancer cell lines DU145, PC3, LNCaP, p67SV40T, M2182, and M12. In this study, we detected the insertion or deletion of one nucleotide in the mononucleotide repeats located within the coding regions of BAX gene in DU145, and TGFbetaRII in M12 cells. In addition, we used an in vitro model of defective MMR to demonstrate that microsatellite instability can be induced in an otherwise stable cancer cell line by transfection with a dominant negative fragment of PMS2. These results suggest that defects in MMR may result in MSI in the secondary genes in prostate cancer. From these results, we conclude that loss of MMR function can produce MSI and target some secondary genes containing microsatellites in their coding regions. These series of events may play important roles in the development of human prostate cancer.     

Nine novel pathogenic germline mutations in MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2 in families with Lynch syndrome

Many germline mutations in the DNA mismatch repair genes have been described so far leading to the clinical phenotype of Lynch syndrome (hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer, HNPCC). Most mutations are private mutations. We report on nine novel pathogenic germline mutations that have been found in families meeting either the Amsterdam or the Bethesda criteria. These findings include the mutations MLH1,c.884+4A>G, MLH1,c.1377_1378insA;p.Glu460ArgfsX19, MLH1,c.1415_1416delGA;p.Arg472ThrfsX5, MSH2,c.301G>T;p.Glu101X, MSH2,c.638_639delTG;p.Leu213GlnfsX18, MSH2,c.842C>A;p.Ser281X, MSH2,c.859G>T;p.Gly287X, MSH6,c.2503C>T;p.Gln835X and a large genomic deletion of exons 1-10 of the PMS2 gene. The mutation MLH1,c.884+4A>G detected in two families results in a complete skipping of exon 10 on mRNA level and thus has been considered as pathogenic. In all cases the tumor tissue of the index patient revealed high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and showed a complete loss of expression of the affected protein in the tumor cells by immunohistochemistry (IHC). The findings underline the importance of a pre-screening of tumor tissue for an efficient definition of conspicuous cases.     

Epitope-positive truncating MLH1 mutation and loss of PMS2: implications for IHC-directed genetic testing for lynch syndrome

We assessed mismatch repair by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and microsatellite instability (MSI) analysis in an early onset endometrial cancer and a sister’s colon cancer. We demonstrated high-level MSI and normal expression for MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6. PMS2 failed to stain in both tumors, strongly implicating a PMS2 defect. This family did not meet clinical criteria for Lynch syndrome. However, early onset endometrial cancers in the proband and her sister, a metachronous colorectal cancer in the sister as well as MSI in endometrial and colonic tumors suggested a heritable mismatch repair defect. PCR-based direct exonic sequencing and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) were undertaken to search for PMS2 mutations in the germline DNA from the proband and her sister. No mutation was identified in the PMS2 gene. However, PMS2 exons 3, 4, 13, 14, 15 were not evaluated by MLPA and as such, rearrangements involving those exons cannot be excluded. Clinical testing for MLH1 and MSH2 mutation revealed a germline deletion of MLH1 exons 14 and 15. This MLH1 germline deletion leads to an immunodetectable stable C-terminal truncated MLH1 protein which based on the IHC staining must abrogate PMS2 stabilization. To the best of our knowledge, loss of PMS2 in MLH1 truncating mutation carriers that express MLH1 in their tumors has not been previously reported. This family points to a potential limitation of IHC-directed gene testing for suspected Lynch syndrome and the need to consider comprehensive MLH1 testing for individuals whose tumors lack PMS2 but for whom PMS2 mutations are not identified.     

Muir–Torre syndrome or phenocopy? The value of the immunohistochemical expression of mismatch repair proteins in sebaceous tumors of immunocompromised patients

Primary and secondary immunodepressive conditions are associated with an increased incidence of sebaceous tumors. Microsatellite instability (MSI) and lack of expression of mismatch repair (MMR) proteins, typical markers of Muir–Torre/Lynch heredo-familial settings, can be recognized also in immunocompromised patients. We aimed to carry on a systematic examination of clinical, immunohistochemical, biomolecular features of sebaceous tumors arising in immunocompromised and immunocompetent patients between 1986 and 2012. Microsatellite screening, immunohistochemical analysis and genetic testing were performed for hMLH1, hMSH2 and hMSH6. Methylation status of MMR genes was checked in cases with immunohistochemistry (IHC) loss of MMR proteins expression and no germline mutations. Fifteen patients had a personal history of visceral carcinomas fulfilling diagnostic criteria for Muir–Torre syndrome. In this cohort, IHC analysis, MSI status and genetic testing were in agreement, showing eight MSH2 and two MLH1 germline mutations. Five patients were immunosuppressed and their sebaceous tumors showed a lack of MSH2/MSH6 expression, although just one case with positive family history for visceral cancer harbored a germline mutation. In immunosuppressed patients, loss of IHC for MMR proteins is not necessarily secondary to MMR germline mutations. IHC false positives are probably due to epigenetic alterations. MSI and lack of expression of MMR proteins can be recognized also in immunocompromised patients without MMR germline mutations.     

Microsatellite Instability and Altered Expressions of MLH1 and MSH2 in Gastric Cancer

Introduction: Microsatellite instability (MSI) is a hallmark of defective DNA mismatch repair (MMR) of genesespecially MLH1 and MSH2. It is frequently involved in the carcinogenesis of various tumours including gastriccancer (GC). However, MSI in GCs have not been reported in Malaysia before. Objective: This study was conductedto determine the microsatellite instability (MSI) status in gastric cancer by microsatellite analysis, sequencing, itsassociation with MLH1 and MSH2 protein expression and H.pylori infection by immunohistochemistry. Method:A total of 60 gastric cancer cases were retrieved. DNA was extracted from paired normal and tumour tissues whileMLH1 and MSH2 protein expression as well as H. pylori status were determined by IHC staining. For microsatelliteanalysis, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed for paired tissue samples using a panel of five microsatellitemarkers. MSI-positive results were subjected for DNA sequencing to assess mutations in the MLH1 and MSH2 genes.Results: Microsatellite analysis identified ten MSI positive cases (16.7%), out of which only six cases (10.3%) showedabsence of MLH1 (n=3) or MSH2 (n=3) protein expression by IHC. The most frequent microsatellite marker in MSIpositive cases was BAT26 (90%). Nine of ten MSI positive cases were intestinal type with one diffuse and all werelocated distally. H. pylori infection was detected in 13 of 60 cases (21.7%) including in three MSI positive cases. Allthese results however were not statistically significant. Our sequencing data displayed novel mutations. However thesedata were not statistically correlated with expression levels of MLH1 and MSH2 proteins by IHC. This may be dueto small sample size to detect small or moderately sized effects. Conclusion: The frequency of MSI in this study wascomparable with published results. Determination of affected MMR genes by more than two antibodies may increasethe sensitivity of IHC to that of MSI analysis.     

Microsatellite Instability in Endometrial Carcinoma by Immunohistochemistry,Association with Clinical and Histopathologic Parameters

Objective: We aimed to investigate the frequency of microsatellite instability (MSI) in endometrial carcinoma in ourpopulation and its association with clinico-pathologic features. Methods: A total of 126 cases of primary endometrialcarcinoma were included in the study that underwent surgical resections. All slides of these cases were reviewed andrepresentative paraffin fixed tissue blocks were selected for MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2 IHC staining. IHCexpression was categorized into five groups: no loss of expression; loss of expression of all four antibodies; combinedloss of MLH1/PMS2; combined loss of MSH2/MSH6; and isolated loss of MLH1. Pathological records of all caseswere retrieved from patient files. Result: Abnormal expression of MSI was noted in 56 cases (44.4%) among which16 cases showed loss of nuclear expression of all markers, 34 cases showed loss of MLH1/PMS2 expression, 4 casesshowed loss of MSH2/MSH6 while only 2 cases revealed isolated loss of MLH. Personal and family history suggestiveof inherited cancer susceptibility was revealed in 11 cases most of which were associated with MSH2/MSH6 loss.Significant association of MSI expression was found with tumor stage and personal/family history of endometrial/colon cancer. Conclusion: A high frequency of endometrioid cancers in our study showed abnormal expression ofMSI markers, most of which depicted MLH1/PMS2 loss and were not associated with inherited cancer susceptibility.On the other hand, a minority of cases showed loss of all MSI markers or MSH2/MSH6 loss and were significantlyassociated with family/personal history of cancer. Therefore, we suggest that epigenetic changes in MLH1 locus maybe a predominant pathway of tumorigenesis in our population rather than inherited mutation of MSI genes; howevermore large scale studies with genetic testing are required to validate this observation.     

Genome-wide copy neutral LOH is infrequent in familial and sporadic microsatellite unstable carcinomas

Mismatch repair deficiency in tumors can result from germ line mutations in one of the mismatch repair (MMR) genes (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2), or from sporadic promoter hypermethylation of MLH1. The role of unclassified variants (UVs) in MMR genes is subject to debate. To establish the extend of chromosomal instability and copy neutral loss of heterozygosity (cnLOH), we analyzed 41 archival microsatellite unstable carcinomas, mainly colon cancer, from 23 patients with pathogenic MMR mutations, from eight patients with UVs in one of the MMR genes and 10 cases with MLH1 promoter hypermethylation. We assessed genome wide copy number abnormalities and cnLOH using SNP arrays. SNP arrays overcome the problems of detecting LOH due to instability of polymorphic microsatellite markers. All carcinomas showed relatively few chromosomal aberrations. Also cnLOH was infrequent and in Lynch syndrome carcinomas usually confined to the locus harbouring pathogenic mutations in MLH1, MSH2 or PMS2 In the carcinomas from the MMR-UV carriers such cnLOH was less common and in the carcinomas with MLH1 promoter hypermethylation no cnLOH at MLH1 occurred. MSI-H carcinomas of most MMR-UV carriers present on average with more aberrations compared to the carcinomas from pathogenic MMR mutation carriers, suggesting that another possible pathogenic MMR mutation had not been missed. The approach we describe here shows to be an excellent way to study genome-wide cnLOH in archival mismatch repair deficient tumors.     

MLH1 and MSH2 protein expression as a pre-screening marker in hereditary and non-hereditary endometrial hyperplasia and cancer

The predictive value of MLH1 or MSH2 protein expression for the presence of truncating germline mutations was examined in benign and (pre)malignant endometrial samples from 3 patient groups: (I) 10 endometrial cancer patients from hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) families with (n = 6) or without (n = 4) a known germline mutation; (II) 15 women from HNPCC families with (n = 7) or without (n = 8) a known germline mutation, who underwent endometrial sampling for non-malignant reasons; (III) 38 endometrial cancer patients <50 years of age, without HNPCC family history. Immunostaining for MLH1 and MSH2 was performed on paraffin-embedded sections. In group III, tumor DNA was examined for microsatellite instability (MSI) and MLH1, MSH2 and MSH6 mutation analysis was carried out. In 6/6 MLH1/MSH2 mutation carriers with endometrial cancer (group I), concordance was found between protein loss in the tumor and the corresponding mutation. In 3 MLH1 mutation carriers, MLH1 protein loss was also observed in concurrent endometrial hyperplasia. In group II, no protein loss was detected in normal endometrial tissue samples; in 3/4 patients with endometrial hyperplasia, MLH1/MSH2 protein loss was observed. In group III, protein loss was detected in 12/38 patients (9 MLH1, 3 MSH2), while in 3/11 patients with concurrent endometrial hyperplasia protein loss was also observed in the hyperplasia. MSI analysis in group III revealed 26 MSI-low and 12 MSI-high tumors. Mutation analysis in 28/38 patients showed only 1 missense MSH6 and no MLH1 or MSH2 germline mutations. In group III, loss of MLH1/MSH2 protein expression was not related to the presence of MSI or MLH1/MSH2 germline mutations. In conclusion, MLH1 or MSH2 protein loss in HNPCC-related endometrial neoplasia is strongly related to corresponding germline mutations. This relation was not clearly present in young sporadic endometrial cancer patients. Immunohistochemical pre-screening of the MLH1 and MSH2 proteins in endometrial hyperplasia or cancer can thus be helpful in HNPCC families. Frequent loss of MLH1 or MSH2 protein in endometrial hyperplasia indicates that this loss is an early event in endometrial carcinogenesis.     

Use of molecular tumor characteristics to prioritize mismatch repair gene testing in early-onset colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: The relationships between mismatch repair (MMR) protein expression, microsatellite instability (MSI), family history, and germline MMR gene mutation status have not been studied on a population basis. METHODS: We studied 131 unselected patients with colorectal cancer diagnosed younger than age 45 years. For the 105 available tumors, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 protein expression using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and MSI were measured. Germline DNA was screened for hMLH1, hMSH2, hMSH6, and hPMS2 mutations for the following patients: all from families fulfilling the Amsterdam Criteria for hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC); all with tumors that were high MSI, low MSI, or that lacked expression of any MMR protein; and a random sample of 23 with MS-stable tumors expressing all MMR proteins. RESULTS: Germline mutations were found in 18 patients (nine hMLH1, four hMSH2, four hMSH6, and one hPMS2); all tumors exhibited loss of MMR protein expression, all but one were high MSI or low MSI, and nine were from a family fulfilling Amsterdam Criteria. Sensitivities of IHC testing, MSI (high or low), and Amsterdam Criteria for MMR gene mutation were 100%, 94%, and 50%, respectively. Corresponding positive predictive values were 69%, 50%, and 75%. CONCLUSIONS: Tumor IHC analysis of four MMR proteins and MSI testing provide a highly sensitive strategy for identifying MMR gene mutation-carrying, early-onset colorectal cancer patients, half of whom would have been missed using Amsterdam Criteria alone. Tumor-based approaches for triaging early-onset colorectal cancer patients for MMR gene mutation testing, irrespective of family history, appear to be an efficient screening strategy for HNPCC.