Restoration of elbow flexion in adult traumatic brachial plexus injury – a quantitative analysis of results of single versus double nerve transfer

BackgroundRestoration of elbow flexion is one of the key components of adult brachial plexus surgery. Nerve transfers are routinely used to attain elbow flexion.PurposeThis study aims to quantify the recovery of elbow flexion power and to compare the outcome following single nerve transfer and double nerve transfer to branches of the musculocutaneous nerve in adult traumatic brachial plexus injury.MethodWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with traumatic upper brachial plexus injury who underwent nerve transfer of the musculocutaneous nerve with either Ulnar nerve fascicles (SN) or both Ulnar and Median nerve fascicles (DN) for restoring elbow flexion. Patients with a minimum follow up of 18 months after surgery were included in this study. Elbow flexion strength was quantified using a force transducer and software module and the results were compared between the two groups.ResultThe median strength of elbow flexion was 14.3 Newton meter. In the SN group, the mean strength of elbow flexion was 5.4 ± 5 Nm, and for DN group it was 20.4 ± 9.9 Nm. Elbow flexion strength following DN procedure was significantly better when compared with SN.ConclusionThe additional nerve transfer of median nerve fascicles with musculocutaneous nerve branch to the brachialis muscle does not add clinically obvious morbidity to the patient but has definite benefit as observed in this study. We advocate double fascicular nerve transfer for elbow flexion in upper brachial plexus injuries if the median and ulnar nerve functions are normal.     

Restoration of Elbow Flexion by Transfer of the Phrenic Nerve to Musculocutaneous Nerve after Brachial Plexus Injuries

Traumatic brachial plexus injuries are a devastating injury that results in partial or total denervation of the muscles of the upper extremity. Treatment options that include neurolysis, nerve grafting, or neurotization (nerve transfer) has become an important procedure in the restoration of function in patients with irreparable preganglionic lesions. Restoration of elbow flexion is the primary goal in treating patients with severe brachial plexus injuries. Nerve transfers are used when spinal roots are avulsed, and proximal stumps are not available. In the present study, we analyze the results obtained in 20 patients treated with phrenic–musculocutaneous nerve transfer to restore elbow flexion after brachial plexus injuries. A consecutive series of 25 adult patients (21 men and 4 women) with a brachial plexus traction/crush lesion were treated with phrenic–musculocutaneous nerve transfer, but only 20 patients (18 men and 2 women) were followed and evaluated for at least 2 years postoperatively. All patients had been referred from other institutions. At the initial evaluation, eight patients received a diagnosis of C5-6 brachial plexus nerve injury, and in the other 12 patients, a complete brachial plexus injury was identified. Reconstruction was undertaken if no clinical or electrical evidence of biceps muscle function was seen by 3 months post injury. Functional elbow flexion was obtained in the majority of cases by phrenic–musculocutaneous nerve transfer (14/20, 70%). At the final follow-up evaluation, elbow flexion strength was a Medical Research Council Grade 5 in two patients, Grade 4 in four patients, Grade 3 in eight patients, and Grade 2 or less in six patients. Transfer involving the phrenic nerve to restore elbow flexion seems to be an appropriate approach for the treatment of brachial plexus root avulsion. Traumatic brachial plexus injury is a devastating injury that result in partial or total denervation of the muscles of the upper extremity. Treatment options include neurolysis, nerve grafting, or neurotization (nerve transfer). Neurotization is the transfer of a functional but less important nerve to a denervated more important nerve. It has become an important procedure in the restoration of function in patients with irreparable preganglionic lesions. Restoration of elbow flexion is the primary goal in treating patients with severe brachial plexus injuries. Nerve transfers are used when spinal roots are avulsed, and proximal stumps are not available. Newer extraplexal sources include the ipsilateral phrenic nerve as reported by Gu et al. (Chin Med J 103:267–270, 1990) and contralateral C7 as reported by Gu et al. (J Hand Surg [Br] 17(B):518–521, 1992) and Songcharoen et al. (J Hand Surg [Am] 26(A):1058–1064, 2001). These nerve transfers have been introduced to expand on the limited donors. The phrenic nerve and its anatomic position directly within the surgical field makes it a tempting source for nerve transfer. Although not always, in cases of complete brachial plexus avulsion, the phrenic nerve is functioning as a result of its C3 and C4 major contributions. In the present study, we analyze the results obtained in 20 patients treated with phrenic–musculocutaneous nerve transfer to restore elbow flexion after brachial plexus injuries.     

肋间神经移位治疗全臂丛根性撕脱伤两种术式的比较

目的　比较肋间神经移位直接与肌皮神经缝合 ,和通过皮神经移植桥接肌皮、肋间神经两种术式的疗效。方法　 3 2例全臂丛根性撕脱伤 ,其中将肋间神经游离 10～ 13cm ,经电刺激证实含有运动神经束后切断 ,与肌皮神经直接缝合 2 0例。在肋间神经与肌皮神经间移植皮神经 (平均长 10 .2cm) 12例。术后平均随访 3年 ,观察肱二头肌屈肘功能及肌力的恢复。结果　肌力达 3级或 3级以上的 ,神经移位组占 75 % ,神经移植组为 2 5 %。结论　肋间神经与肌皮神经缝接后 ,屈肘功能恢复明显 ,直接缝合组优于神经移植桥接组 (P <0 .0 1)。     

多组神经移位治疗臂丛上、中干根性撕脱伤重建肩外展及屈肘功能

目的 观察联合应用多组神经移位治疗臂丛上、中干根性撕脱伤的临床效果。方法 我科于2012年4月至2014年4月收治臂丛上、中干根性撕脱伤损伤患者16例,采用副神经斜方肌肌支移位修复肩胛上神经、桡神经肱三头肌长头支移位修复腋神经肌支及Oberlin术式,联合修复臂丛上、中干根性撕脱伤,恢复肩外展及屈肘功能。术后随访采用DASH评分表进行手术疗效评估。结果 术后16例患者中14例得到随访。随访24—28个月(平均25个月),患者肩关节外展恢复至75°-90°,恢复时间9-18个月(平均14个月)。屈肘恢复至100°-160°,恢复时间4-7.5个月（平均5.8个月）。DASH评分8-14分,平均14.6分。结论 臂丛上、中干损伤使用多组神经移位联合治疗,可较好恢复肩外展及屈肘功能,尺神经部分束支移位修复肌皮神经肱二头肌支对手内在肌功能无明显影响。     

Nerve transfers to the biceps and brachialis branches to improve elbow flexion strength after brachial plexus injuries

OBJECT: In this study the authors evaluated the outcome in patients with brachial plexus injuries who underwent nerve transfers to the biceps and the brachialis branches of the musculocutaneous nerve. METHODS: The charts of eight patients who underwent an ulnar nerve fascicle transfer to the biceps branch of the musculocutaneous nerve and a separate transfer to the brachialis branch were retrospectively reviewed. Outcome was assessed using the Medical Research Council (MRC) grade to classify elbow flexion strength in conjunction with electromyography (EMG). The mean patient age was 26.4 years (range 16-45 years) and the mean time from injury to surgery was 3.8 months (range 2.5-7.5 months). Recovery of elbow flexion was MRC Grade 4 in five patients, and Grade 4+ in three. Reinnervation of both the biceps and brachialis muscles was confirmed on EMG studies. Ulnar nerve function was not downgraded in any patient. CONCLUSIONS: The use of nerve transfers to reinnervate the biceps and brachialis muscle provides excellent elbow flexion strength in patients with brachial plexus nerve injuries.     

Technique of the double nerve transfer to recover elbow flexion in C5, C6, or C5 to C7 brachial plexus palsy

In C5, C6, or C5-to-C7 root injuries, many surgical procedures have been proposed to restore active elbow flexion. Nerve grafts or nerve transfers are the main techniques being carried out. The transfer of ulnar nerve fascicles to the biceps branch of the musculocutaneous nerve is currently proposed to restore active elbow flexion. Recovery of biceps muscle function is generally sufficient to obtain elbow flexion. However, the strength of elbow flexion is sometimes weak because the brachialis muscle is not reinnervated. Therefore, the transfer of 1 fascicle of the median nerve to the brachialis branch of the musculocutaneous nerve may be proposed to improve strength of the elbow flexion. We describe the technique of this double transfer to restore elbow flexion. The results concerning 5 patients are presented.     

联合尺神经束支和臂丛外神经移位治疗臂丛损伤

目的 观察联合尺神经束支和臂丛外神经移位治疗臂丛损伤的临床效果.方法 臂丛损伤6例,其中单纯上干损伤4例;上中干为主,合并下干部分损伤2例.伤后平均2.8个月接受手术.术式包括尺神经部分束支转位至肌皮神经肱二头肌肌支,膈神经或者副神经斜方肌支转位至肩胛上神经,桡神经肱三头肌长头肌支转位修复腋神经肌支.用肱二头肌、岗上肌和三角肌肌力,肩外展和上举角度,尺神经功能损失等指标对手术方式和效果进行评估.结果 6例中5例得到随访,平均随访时间18个月,肱二头肌均在术后3～4个月开始恢复肌力.随访时间18个月以上的4例屈肘M_4~+～M_5;随访时间4个月的1例屈肘M_3~+.其中3例行外展功能重建,单用膈神经修复的病例上臂可上举至180°,外展肌力M_4~+;联合副神经和肱三头肌长头肌支修复的病例上肢可外展90°,肌力M_4~-;单用副神经修复的病例上肢可外展80°,肌力M_3~+.3例手部握持力与术前相同,2例增强.4例手部尺神经供区功能无明显影响,1例小指掌侧皮肤感觉减退,第一骨间背侧肌萎缩.结论 尺神经部分束支转位修复肱二头肌支可以有效的恢复臂丛损伤后屈肘功能;用膈神经修复肩胛上神经可能取得更好的肩外展和上举效果;本组臂丛下干部分损伤的病例受伤均在3个月内,采用此术式同样恢复了肱二头肌功能,未加重原有的手功能障碍.     

Nerve Transfers for Traumatic Brachial Plexus Injury: Advantages and Problems

In recent years nerve transfers have been increasingly used to broaden reconstructive options for brachial plexus reconstruction. Nerve transfer is a procedure where an expendable nerve is connected to a more important nerve in order to reinnervate that nerve. This article outlines the experience of the Scottish National Brachial Plexus Injury Service as our use of nerve transfers has increased. Outcomes have improved for reconstruction of the paralysed shoulder using transfer of the accessory nerve to the suprascapular nerve. Medial pectoral to musculocutaneous nerve transfer has proved reliable for restoration of elbow flexion for patients with C5,6 and C5,6,7 injuries. Problems with nerve transfers include morbidity in the donor nerve territory, co-contraction, and pre-existing injury to the donor nerve. There is a balance of risks in these procedures which should be weighed up in individual cases.     

Transfer of pectoral nerves to the musculocutaneous nerve in obstetric upper brachial plexus palsy

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the results of transfer of pectoral nerves to the musculocutaneous nerve for treatment of obstetric brachial palsy. METHODS: In 25 cases of obstetric brachial palsy (20 after breech deliveries), branches of the pectoral nerve plexus were transferred directly to the musculocutaneous nerve. For all patients, the nerve transfer was part of an extended brachial plexus reconstruction. Results were tested both clinically and with the Mallet scale, at a mean follow-up time of 70 months (standard deviation, 34.3 mo). RESULTS: There were two complete failures, which were attributable to disconnection of the transferred nerve endings. The results after transfer were excellent in 17 cases and fair in 5 cases. Steindler flexorplasty improved elbow flexion for three patients. CONCLUSION: Transfer of pectoral nerves to the musculocutaneous nerve for treatment of obstetric upper brachial palsy may be effective, if the specific anatomic features of the pectoral nerve plexus are sufficiently appreciated.     

Restoration of upper arm function in traction injuries to the brachial plexus

Summary. Summary.   Background: Restoration of upper arm function presents the main priority in nerve repair of brachial plexus traction injuries. The results are predominantly influenced by the level and extent of injury, and the type of surgical procedure. The purpose of this study is to evaluate influence of these factors on final outcome.   Methods: Study included 91 surgically treated patients, including 71 patients with avulsions of one or more spinal nerve roots and 20 with peripheral traction injuries. We performed 120 nerve transfers, 25 nerve graftings and 29 neurolyses on different nerve elements depending on the type of nerve damage. Analysis of motor recovery for elbow flexion and arm abduction, isolated or in combination, was done.   Findings: Recovery of elbow flexion was obtained in 75% nerve transfers, and in 68,7% nerve graftings in peripheral traction injuries. Recovery of arm abduction was obtained in 78,5% nerve transfers, and in 44,4% nerve graftings in peripheral traction injuries. Neurolysis was successful in all cases. Generally, the quality of recovery was better for the musculocutaneous nerve. Useful global upper arm function was obtained in 49,3% of patients with avulsion of spinal nerve roots, and in 55% of patients with peripheral traction injuries.   Interpretation: Regarding upper arm function the prognosis of surgically treated patients with traction injuries to the brachial plexus is generally similar in cases with central or peripheral level of injury. However, nerve transfers of collateral branches seem to be superior to nerve grafting and may be another possibility for repair in cases with extensive nerve gaps.     

Results of reinnervation of the biceps and brachialis muscles with a double fascicular transfer for elbow flexion

PURPOSE: To report the results of a surgical technique of nerve transfer to reinnervate the brachialis muscle and the biceps muscle to restore elbow flexion after brachial plexus injury. METHODS: Retrospective review was performed on 6 patients who had direct nerve transfer of a single expendable motor fascicle from both the ulnar and median nerves directly to the biceps and brachialis branches of the musculocutaneous nerve. Assessment included degree of recovery of elbow flexion and ulnar and median nerve function including pinch and grip strengths. RESULTS: Clinical evidence of reinnervation was noted at a mean of 5.5 months (SD, 1 mo; range, 3.5-7 mo) after surgery and the mean follow-up period was 20.5 months (SD, 11.2 mo, range, 13-43 mo). Mean recovery of elbow flexion was Medical Research Council grade 4+. Postoperative pinch and grip strengths were unchanged or better in all patients. No motor or sensory deficits related to the ulnar or median nerves were noted and all patients maintained good hand function. No patients required additional procedures to further improve elbow flexion strength. CONCLUSIONS: Transfer of expendable motor fascicles from the ulnar and median nerves successfully can reinnervate the biceps and brachialis muscles for strong elbow flexion. The reinnervation of the brachialis muscle, the primary elbow flexor, as well as the biceps muscle provides an additional biomechanical advantage that accounts for the excellent elbow flexion strength obtained using this technique. Direct coaptation of the nerve fascicles was performed without the need for nerve grafts and there was no functional or sensory donor morbidity.     

胸背神经双分支的解剖研究与临床应用

目的 对胸背神经的外侧束和腋神经穿越四边孔后支配的三角肌肌支进行显微解剖研究,并应用于临床,为臂丛神经损伤后功能重建提供新的方法。方法 取17具成人尸体,在手术显微镜下对31侧胸背神经外侧束和液神经三角肌肌支进行解剖,观察其可应用长度、直径及分支情况,并取神经标本经HE染色、石蜡切片,对有髓神经纤维进行计数。临床上进行3例手术。例1钭胸背神经外侧束与四边孔内切断的腋神经三角肌肌支吻合,例2在例1休式基础上,用胸背神经内侧束支配的部分背阔肌重建屈肘功能,例3将背阔肌按内、外侧束的支配区域,剪切成两部分,移位的同时重建屈肘、屈指功能,结果 胸背神经在人背阔肌处开始分为内、外侧束,外侧束明显较内侧束粗大,外侧束在背阔肌内可利用的长度平均为58.2mm直径平均为1.46mm,有髓纤维数平均为1519根,90.4%的外侧束可再分为2支或3支,腋神经三角肌肌支直径平均为2.31mm,有髓纤维数 平均为2341根,61.3%的三角肌肌支可再分为3支,32.3%的三角肌肌支可再分为2支,3例术后情况：例1三角肌肌力为4级;例2三角肌肌力为4级,屈肘时肌力为4级;例3屈肘、指时肌力均达到4级。结论 应用胸背双分支的解剖基础。将胸背神经外侧束与腋神经三角肌肌支相吻合恢复三角肌的功能,从理论和[实践上是统一的,是行这有效的方法,充分利用胸背神经双分支的原理可以重建两块失神经支配的肌群功能。     

Primary restoration of elbow flexion in adult post-traumatic plexopathy patients

Restoration of elbow flexion is one of the priorities in brachial plexus palsy, as this function brings the hand to the mouth. This study analyses the results of musculocutaneous nerve reconstruction in 194 patients with devastating paralysis. Results were analyzed in relation to denervation time, severity score, length of nerve grafts, and donor nerves used. Between 1978 and 2006, 194 post-traumatic plexopathy patients underwent musculocutaneous nerve reconstruction. 298 motor donors were used in 175 patients while 19 patients had microneurolysis. There were 104 intraplexus motor donors; 124 intercostal nerves were transferred in 39 patients; direct coaptation was performed in 31 patients and three or more intercostals were transferred in 33 patients; 16 patients underwent musculocutaneous to musculocutaneous repair. 144 patients had interposition nerve grafts. The mean follow-up was 4.48?±?2.78 years. Results were good or excellent (≥M3+) in 52.53% of patients with more than 70° of elbow flexion. Patients, who were operated on less than 4 months from injury, with high severity score, attained significant better results than late cases with multiple root avulsions. Intraplexus donors have direct influence on biceps recovery, achieving significant better results than extraplexus donors. Intercostal nerves are an alternative source in avulsion injuries. The use of 3 intercostals with direct coaptation yielded optimal elbow flexion. Musculocutaneous nerve reconstruction is one of the priorities in upper limb reanimation. Functional outcomes are influenced by the age of the patient, severity of plexus lesion, denervation time, and type of reconstruction. Early surgery is recommended.     

The role of the musculocutaneous and radial nerves in elbow flexion and forearm supination: a biomechanical study

The intention of this prospective study was to evaluate the role of the musculocutaneous and radial nerves in elbow flexion and forearm supination. The study included 29 patients having loco-regional anaesthesia for minor hand surgery. Elbow flexion and forearm supination forces were evaluated before and after an isolated musculocutaneous nerve block in one group and an isolated radial nerve block in another group. The results showed that the biceps tendon is responsible for 47% of the forearm supination force and the combination of brachioradialis and the supinator for 64% of this force. It showed also that the musculocutaneous and radial nerves contribute by 42% and 27.5%, respectively, to the flexion force of the elbow. These results are intended to help surgeons in decision making when treating chronic biceps tendon rupture, in repair of traumatic brachial plexus neuropathy and in using tendon transfers, such as the Steindler transfer, around the elbow.     

Electromyographic comparison of various exercises to improve elbow flexion following intercostal nerve transfer

We compared the quantitative electromyographic activity of the elbow flexors during four exercises (forced inspiration, forced expiration, trunk flexion and attempted elbow flexion), following intercostal nerve transfer to the musculocutaneous nerve in 32 patients who had sustained root avulsion brachial plexus injuries. Quantitative electromyographic evaluation of the mean and maximum amplitude was repeated three times for each exercise. We found that mean and maximum elbow flexor activity was highest during trunk flexion, followed by attempted elbow flexion, forced inspiration and finally forced expiration. The difference between each group was significant (p < 0.001), with the exception of the difference between trunk flexion and attempted elbow flexion. Consequently, we recommend trunk flexion exercises to aid rehabilitation following intercostal nerve transfer.     

Patient outcome following a thoracodorsal to musculocutaneous nerve transfer for reconstruction of elbow flexion.

This study reports patient outcome following a thoracodorsal to musculocutaneous nerve transfer. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of six patients who had undergone transfer of the thoracodorsal nerve to the musculocutaneous nerve for reconstruction of elbow flexion. The mean age was 47 years (standard deviation: 24 years; range: 17-72 years). The mean time from injury to surgery was 3 months (standard deviation: 2 months; range: 1-5 months). In all cases, the biceps muscle was successfully reinnervated; in one case the Medical Research Council (MRC) muscle grade was grade 5, in four cases it was grade 4, and in one case it was grade 2. No patients complained of functional weakness with shoulder adduction and/or internal rotation. In the majority of cases, transfer of the thoracodorsal nerve to the musculocutaneous nerve provides excellent recovery of elbow flexion.     

Use of quantitative intra-operative electrodiagnosis during partial ulnar nerve transfer to restore elbow flexion: the treatment of eight patients following a brachial plexus injury

The transfer of part of the ulnar nerve to the musculocutaneous nerve, first described by Oberlin, can restore flexion of the elbow following brachial plexus injury. In this study we evaluated the additional benefits and effectiveness of quantitative electrodiagnosis to select a donor fascicle. Eight patients who had undergone transfer of a simple fascicle of the ulnar nerve to the motor branch of the musculocutaneous nerve were evaluated. In two early patients electrodiagnosis had not been used. In the remaining six patients, however, all fascicles of the ulnar nerve were separated and electrodiagnosis was performed after stimulation with a commercially available electromyographic system. In these procedures, recording electrodes were placed in flexor carpi ulnaris and the first dorsal interosseous. A single fascicle in the flexor carpi ulnaris in which a high amplitude had been recorded was selected as a donor and transferred to the musculocutaneous nerve. In the two patients who had not undergone electrodiagnosis, the recovery of biceps proved insufficient for normal use. Conversely, in the six patients in whom quantitative electrodiagnosis was used, elbow flexion recovered to an M4 level. Quantitative intra-operative electrodiagnosis is an effective method of selecting a favourable donor fascicle during the Oberlin procedure. Moreover, fascicles showing a high-amplitude in reading flexor carpi ulnaris are donor nerves that can restore normal elbow flexion without intrinsic loss.     

Musculocutaneous neurotization to restore elbow flexion in brachial plexus paralysis

Brachial plexus injuries may result in devastating paralysis, especially if they involve all the roots. The upper roots are often traumatized, and therefore elbow flexion is usually lost. The prognosis of these injuries is grave if root avulsions are present and the paralysis includes the hand as well. The current management of brachial plexus injuries should be early, aggressive microsurgical reconstruction of the plexus, combining various neurotizations with intraplexus and extraplexus nerve donors. Following this principle, we present the results of musculocutaneous neurotization in our unit, as well as a review of the literature on this subject. Our results are comparable to those reported in the literature, and indicate that the strongest function is achieved after neurotization via intraplexus donors, while some extraplexus donors (i.e., phrenic and accessory nerve) can offer equally strong elbow flexion, especially if they are used in combination. Neurotization of the musculocutaneous nerve should be one of the primary goals in the reconstruction of the injured plexus, since the return of elbow flexion is of paramount importance in daily activity. The restoration of function is ensured if the stronger and healthier motor donors are dedicated to the neurotization of the musculocutaneous nerve. Sometimes in order to match the axonal number of the target to the lower number of axons offered by the donors, two or more donor nerves may be driven to the same target, such as the musculocutaneous nerve.     

The sensory-motor bridge neurorraphy: an anatomic study of feasibility between sensory branch of the musculocutaneous nerve and deep branch of the radial nerve

Introduction: Restoring elbow flexion remains the first step in the management of total palsy of the brachial plexus. Non avulsed upper roots may be grafted on the musculocutaneous nerve. When this nerve is entirely grafted, some motor fibres regenerate within the sensory fibres quota. Aiming potential utilization of these lost motor fibres, we attempted suturing the sensory branch of the musculocutaneous nerve onto the deep branch of the radial nerve. The objective of our study was to assess the anatomic feasibility of such direct suturing of the terminal sensory branch of the musculocutaneous nerve onto the deep branch of the radial nerve. Methods: The study was carried out with 10 upper limbs from fresh cadavers. The sensory branch of the musculocutaneous muscle was dissected right to its division. The motor branch of the radial nerve was identified and dissected as proximally as possible into the radial nerve. Then, the distance separating the two nerves was measured so as to assess whether direct neurorraphy of the two branches was feasible. Results: The excessive distance between the two branches averaged 6 mm (1–13 mm). Thus, direct neurorraphy of the sensory branch of the musculocutaneous nerve and the deep branch of the radial nerve was possible. Conclusions: When the whole musculocutaneous nerve is grafted, some of its motor fibres are lost amongst the sensory fibres (cutaneous lateral antebrachial nerve). By suturing this sensory branch onto the deep branch of the radial nerve, “lost” fibres may be retrieved, resulting in restoration of digital extension. © 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. Microsurgery, 2011.     

创伤性全臂丛撕脱伤上肢整体功能重建的临床研究

 目的 观察采用多组神经移位术结合后期手功能重建恢复全臂丛神经撕脱伤患者主动拾物功能的疗效。方法 33例全臂丛神经撕脱伤患者,一期手术均采用多组神经移位术,即副神经移位修复肩胛上神经恢复肩外展,健侧C7神经经椎体前通路移位与患侧下干直接吻合重建屈指、屈腕功能,同时将下干发出的前臂内侧皮神经移位修复肌皮神经恢复屈肘功能,膈神经与下干后股直接吻合同时重建伸肘、伸指功能。术后选择肌力获得有效恢复(肩外展恢复到30°或以上, 伸肘、伸指肌力达到3级或以上,屈肘、屈腕、屈指肌力达到4级或以上)的患者进行二期手功能重建恢复患手的主动抓握功能。主要包括腕关节固定术、拇外展功能重建及掌板紧缩术等。结果 一期神经移位术后平均41±7.7(36~73)个月。10例患者的肌力恢复达到二期手功能重建的条件,其中8例已进行二期手功能重建。6例患者恢复了部分主动拾物功能,1例因爪形指纠正失败,另1例因腕融合术后伸指肌腱粘连致伸指功能丧失。结论 新设计的多组神经移位术可同时恢复全臂丛撕脱伤患者的肩外展、屈肘、屈腕、屈指及伸肘、伸指的有效肌力,在此基础上通过后期手功能重建,可成功重建患侧上肢的部分主动拾物功能。