New upper bound for multicolor Ramsey number of odd cycles

Let $r_k\left(C_{2m+1}\right)$ be the $k$-color Ramsey number of an odd cycle $C_{2m+1}$ of length $2m+1$. It is shown that for each fixed $m\ge 2$, $r_k\left(C_{2m+1}\right)<c^k\sqrt{k!}$for all sufficiently large $k$, where $c=c\left(m\right)>0$ is a constant. This improves an old result by Bondy and Erd?s (1973).     

Fractional chromatic numbers of tensor products of three graphs

The tensor product $(G_1,G_2,G_3)$ of graphs $G_1$, $G_2$ and $G_3$ is defined by $V(G_1,G_2,G_3)=V\left(G_1\right)\times V\left(G_2\right)\times V\left(G_3\right)$and $E(G_1,G_2,G_3)=\left\{\left((u_1,u_2,u_3),(v_1,v_2,v_3)\right):\left|\{i:(u_i,v_i)\in E\left(G_i\right)\}\right|\ge 2\right\}.$Let ${\chi }_f\left(G\right)$ be the fractional chromatic number of a graph $G$. In this paper, we prove that if one of the three graphs $G_1$, $G_2$ and $G_3$ is a circular clique, ${\chi }_f(G_1,G_2,G_3)=min\{{\chi }_f\left(G_1\right){\chi }_f\left(G_2\right),{\chi }_f\left(G_1\right){\chi }_f\left(G_3\right),{\chi }_f\left(G_2\right){\chi }_f\left(G_3\right)\}.$     

Vertex partitions of (C3,C4,C6)-free planar graphs

A graph is $(k_1,k_2)$-colorable if it admits a vertex partition into a graph with maximum degree at most $k_1$ and a graph with maximum degree at most $k_2$. We show that every $(C_3,C_4,C_6)$-free planar graph is $(0,6)$-colorable. We also show that deciding whether a $(C_3,C_4,C_6)$-free planar graph is $(0,3)$-colorable is NP-complete.     

Spanning trees with at most 4 leaves in K1,5-free graphs

In 2009, Kyaw proved that every $n$-vertex connected $K_{1,4}$-free graph $G$ with ${\sigma }_4\left(G\right)\ge n?1$ contains a spanning tree with at most 3 leaves. In this paper, we prove an analogue of Kyaw’s result for connected $K_{1,5}$-free graphs. We show that every $n$-vertex connected $K_{1,5}$-free graph $G$ with ${\sigma }_5\left(G\right)\ge n?1$ contains a spanning tree with at most 4 leaves. Moreover, the degree sum condition “${\sigma }_5\left(G\right)\ge n?1$” is best possible.     

Context-free grammars,generating functions and combinatorial arrays

Let ${\left[R_{n,k}\right]}_{n,k\ge 0}$ be an array of nonnegative numbers satisfying the recurrence relation $R_{n,k}=(a_{1}n+a_{2}k+a_3)R_{n-1,k}+(b_{1}n+b_{2}k+b_3)R_{n-1,k-1}+(c_{1}n+c_{2}k+c_3)R_{n-1,k-2}$ with $R_{0,0}=1$ and $R_{n,k}=0$ unless $0\le k\le n$. In this paper, we first prove that the array ${\left[R_{n,k}\right]}_{n,k\ge 0}$ can be generated by some context-free Grammars, which gives a unified proof of many known results. Furthermore, we present criteria for real rootedness of row-generating functions and asymptotical normality of rows of ${\left[R_{n,k}\right]}_{n,k\ge 0}$. Applying the criteria to some arrays related to tree-like tableaux, interior and left peaks, alternating runs, flag descent numbers of group of type $B$, and so on, we get many results in a unified manner. Additionally, we also obtain the continued fraction expansions for generating functions related to above examples. As results, we prove the strong $q$-log-convexity of some generating functions.     

The combinatorial properties of the Benoumhani polynomials for the Whitney numbers of Dowling lattices

In the papers (Benoumhani 1996;1997), Benoumhani defined two polynomials $F_{m,n,1}\left(x\right)$ and $F_{m,n,2}\left(x\right)$. Then, he defined $A_m(n,k)$ and $B_m(n,k)$ to be the polynomials satisfying $F_{m,n,1}\left(x\right)={\sum }_{k=0}^n{A}_m(n,k)x^{n?k}{(x+1)}^k$ and $F_{m,n,1}\left(x\right)={\sum }_{k=0}^n{B}_m(n,k)x^{n?k}{(x+1)}^k$. In this paper, we give a combinatorial interpretation of the coefficients of $A_{m+1}(n,k)$ and prove a symmetry of the coefficients, i.e., $\left[m^s\right]A_{m+1}(n,k)=\left[m^{n?s}\right]A_{m+1}(n,n?k)$. We give a combinatorial interpretation of $B_{m+1}(n,k)$ and prove that $B_{m+1}(n,n?1)$ is a polynomial in $m$ with non-negative integer coefficients. We also prove that if $n\ge 6$ then all coefficients of $B_{m+1}(n,n?2)$ except the coefficient of $m^{n?1}$ are non-negative integers. For all $n$, the coefficient of $m^{n?1}$ in $B_{m+1}(n,n?2)$ is $?(n?1)$, and when $n\le 5$ some other coefficients of $B_{m+1}(n,n?2)$ are also negative.     

Remarks on the distribution of colors in Gallai colorings

A Gallai coloring of a complete graph $K_n$ is an edge coloring without triangles colored with three different colors. A sequence $e_1\ge \cdots \ge e_k$ of positive integers is an $(n,k)$-sequence if ${\sum }_{i=1}^k{e}_i=\left(\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{n}{2}\right)$. An $(n,k)$-sequence is a G-sequence if there is a Gallai coloring of $K_n$ with $k$ colors such that there are $e_i$ edges of color $i$ for all $i,1\le i\le k$. Gyárfás, Pálvölgyi, Patkós and Wales proved that for any integer $k\ge 3$ there exists an integer $g\left(k\right)$ such that every $(n,k)$-sequence is a G-sequence if and only if $n\ge g\left(k\right)$. They showed that $g\left(3\right)=5,g\left(4\right)=8$ and $2k-2\le g\left(k\right)\le 8k^2+1$.We show that $g\left(5\right)=10$ and give almost matching lower and upper bounds for $g\left(k\right)$ by showing that with suitable constants $\alpha ,\beta >0$, $\frac{\alpha k^{1.5}}{lnk}\le g\left(k\right)\le \beta k^{1.5}$ for all sufficiently large $k$.     

Complete graphs and complete bipartite graphs without rainbow path

Motivated by Ramsey-type questions, we consider edge-colorings of complete graphs and complete bipartite graphs without rainbow path. Given two graphs $G$ and $H$, the $k$-colored Gallai–Ramsey number $g{r}_k(G:H)$ is defined to be the minimum integer $n$ such that $\left(\genfrac{}{}{0ex}{}{n}{2}\right)\ge k$ and for every $N\ge n$, every rainbow $G$-free coloring (using all $k$ colors) of the complete graph $K_N$ contains a monochromatic copy of $H$. In this paper, we first provide some exact values and bounds of $g{r}_k(P_5:K_t)$. Moreover, we define the $k$-colored bipartite Gallai–Ramsey number $bg{r}_k(G:H)$ as the minimum integer $n$ such that $n^2\ge k$ and for every $N\ge n$, every rainbow $G$-free coloring (using all $k$ colors) of the complete bipartite graph $K_{N,N}$ contains a monochromatic copy of $H$. Furthermore, we describe the structures of complete bipartite graph $K_{n,n}$ with no rainbow $P_4$ and $P_5$, respectively. Finally, we find the exact values of $bg{r}_k(P_4:K_{s,t})$ ($1\le s\le t$), $bg{r}_k(P_4:F)$ (where $F$ is a subgraph of $K_{s,t}$), $bg{r}_k(P_5:K_{1,t})$ and $bg{r}_k(P_5:K_{2,t})$ by using the structural results.     

Erdős–Gallai stability theorem for linear forests

The Erd?s–Gallai Theorem states that every graph of average degree more than $l?2$ contains a path of order $l$ for $l\ge 2$. In this paper, we obtain a stability version of the Erd?s–Gallai Theorem in terms of minimum degree. Let $G$ be a connected graph of order $n$ and $F=\left({?}_{i=1}^k{P}_{2a_i}\right)?\left({?}_{i=1}^l{P}_{2b_i+1}\right)$ be $k+l$ disjoint paths of order $2a_1,\dots ,2a_k,2b_1+1,\dots ,2b_l+1,$ respectively, where $k\ge 0$, $0\le l\le 2$, and $k+l\ge 2$. If the minimum degree $\delta \left(G\right)\ge {\sum }_{i=1}^k{a}_i+{\sum }_{i=1}^l{b}_i?1$, then $F?G$ except several classes of graphs for sufficiently large $n$, which extends and strengths the results of Ali and Staton for an even path and Yuan and Nikiforov for an odd path.     

Connected k-dominating graphs

For a graph $G=(V,E)$, the $k$-dominating graph $D_k\left(G\right)$ of $G$ has vertices corresponding to the dominating sets of $G$ having cardinality at most $k$, where two vertices of $D_k\left(G\right)$ are adjacent if and only if the dominating set corresponding to one of the vertices can be obtained from the dominating set corresponding to the second vertex by the addition or deletion of a single vertex. We denote the domination and upper domination numbers of $G$ by $\gamma \left(G\right)$ and $\Gamma \left(G\right)$, respectively, and the smallest integer $\epsilon$ for which $D_k\left(G\right)$ is connected for all $k\ge \epsilon$ by $d_0\left(G\right)$. It is known that $\Gamma \left(G\right)+1\le d_0\left(G\right)\le \left|V\right|$, but constructing a graph $G$ such that $d_0\left(G\right)>\Gamma \left(G\right)+1$ appears to be difficult.We present two related constructions. The first construction shows that for each integer $k\ge 3$ and each integer $r$ such that $1\le r\le k?1$, there exists a graph $G_{k,r}$ such that $\Gamma \left(G_{k,r}\right)=k$, $\gamma \left(G_{k,r}\right)=r+1$ and $d_0\left(G_{k,r}\right)=k+r=\Gamma \left(G\right)+\gamma \left(G\right)?1$. The second construction shows that for each integer $k\ge 3$ and each integer $r$ such that $1\le r\le k?1$, there exists a graph $Q_{k,r}$ such that $\Gamma \left(Q_{k,r}\right)=k$, $\gamma \left(Q_{k,r}\right)=r$ and $d_0\left(Q_{k,r}\right)=k+r=\Gamma \left(G\right)+\gamma \left(G\right)$.