Comparison of the results between two diagnostic criteria by ADA and WHO among subjects with FPG 5.6-7.8 mmol/l in Kin-Hu and Kin-Chen, Kinmen, 1991-94.

The objective of this study was to compare the results between two diagnostic criteria by ADA (1997) and WHO (1985) among those with fasting plasma glucose (FPG) level 5.6-7.8 mmol/l from a community-based survey in Kin-Hu and Kin-Chen, Kinmen conducted in 1991-94. According to official household registry, 10,797 residents aged over 30 were eligible for screening. 7580 had completed FPG screening and 1855 with FPG 5.6-7.8 mmol/l were invited to receive a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). 78.5% (1456/1855) had completed OGTT. The prevalence of impaired fasting glucose (IFG, by ADA) was 15.7%; the prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance (IGT, by WHO) was 22.7%; the prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes was 7.4% by ADA criteria and 10.9% by WHO criteria. It should be noticed that, among subjects with FPG 5.6-7.8 mmol/l, 50.3% of individuals with undiagnosed diabetes and 67.6% of individuals with IGT by WHO criteria would be missed by ADA criteria. Based on the above findings, the two-step screening strategy using FPG as the first line screening and OGTT for high-risk group (FPG 5.6-7.8 mmol/l) only was recommended in epidemiological study and case finding in consideration of feasibility and validity.     

Diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus and other categories of glucose intolerance: 1997 criteria by the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus (ADA), 1998 WHO consultation criteria, and 1985 WHO criteria. World Health Organization.

To compare 1997 ADA diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus and other categories of glucose intolerance/1998 WHO Consultation criteria versus 1985 WHO criteria, we analyzed data from a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) performed on 1051 high-risk subjects without medical history of diabetes at Diabetes Screening Clinic, Ramathibodi Hospital, Thailand. There were 372 males and 679 females, aged (mean +/- S.D.) = 50.3 +/- 12.55 years, BMI = 25.62 +/- 4.39 kg/m2. If fasting plasma glucose (FPG) was used as recently recommended then 54.1, 20.4, and 25.5% of cases were classified as normal, impaired fasting glucose (IFG), and diabetic, respectively. In diagnosing diabetes using a full OGTT based on the 1985 WHO criteria as the reference test, FPG > or = 7 mmol/l had a sensitivity of 57.7%, specificity of 97.4%, positive predictive value of 94.0%, and negative predictive value of 76.4%; 53.7% of subjects with IFG had 2-h plasma glucose > or = 11.1 mmol/l. The 1997 ADA/1998 WHO Consultation criteria and 1985 WHO criteria for a full OGTT yield similar overall results. FPG ( > or = 7 mmol/l) was not sensitive for diagnosing diabetes. Moreover, about half of the subjects with IFG were actually diabetic. Therefore, OGTT remains a valuable test in diagnosing diabetes and classifying various categories of glucose intolerance.     

Screening for diabetes mellitus--a two-step approach in individuals with impaired fasting glucose improves detection of those at risk of complications.

AIMS: To compare the new American Diabetes Association (ADA) fasting plasma glucose (FPG) criteria to the 1985 World Health Organization (WHO) 2-h post glucose (2hPG) criteria when used for screening of those with no prior history of diabetes mellitus. METHODS: The study included 3,407 subjects without a history of diabetes in whom both FPG and 2hPG were available from the 1992 Singapore National Health Survey. The agreement (kappa) between FPG and 2hPG for the diagnosis of DM was assessed. The optimal cut-off of FPG for the detection of individuals with 2hPG > or = 11.1 mmol/l was determined by receiver-operating characteristics analysis. RESULTS: The prevalence of diabetes diagnosed by FPG alone was 7.3% compared to 8.4% diagnosed by 2hPG. The prevalence of impaired fasting glucose was 8.0%. FPG and 2hPG showed moderate agreement (kappa = 0.646, 95% confidence interval 0.584-0.708). Age, ethnic group and obesity did not affect the degree of agreement. Of those with 2hPG > or = 11.1 mmol/l, 40.8% had FPG in the non-diabetic range while 24.8% of those with FG > or = 7.0 mmol/l had 2hPG in the non-diabetic range. The optimal FPG for the detection of 2hPG > or =11.1 mmol/l was 6.1 mmol/l. Oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT) in those with 6.0 mmol/ < FPG < 7.0 mmol/l resulted in the diagnosis of diabetes in 90.7% of individuals at risk of microvascular complications. CONCLUSIONS: FPG provides a simple screening test for diabetes, which shows moderate agreement with the 2hPG. A two-step strategy of OGTT in those with impaired fasting glucose improves the detection of at-risk individuals. However, diabetes should not be diagnosed on a single test. The test should be repeated on another day if an individual tests positive for diabetes.     

Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus – do the new WHO criteria make a difference?

AIMS: To describe the prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) according to the 1998 WHO provisional recommendations and compare it to that found with previous 1985 WHO criteria. METHODS: A total of 5564 consecutive women aged 20 years or more without diagnosis of diabetes mellitus outside of pregnancy in general prenatal care clinics of the National Health Service in 6 state capitals of Brazil, between their 20th and 28th gestational weeks were enrolled. RESULTS: Of the 5004 women who completed a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test, 379 (7.6%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 6.9% to 8.4%) had GDM by the 1998 criteria (fasting glucose > or = 7.0 mmol/l or 2 h glucose > or = 7.8 mmol/l). Of these 379 cases, only 21 (5.5%) had hyperglycaemia in the range considered diabetes mellitus outside pregnancy (fasting glucose > or = 7.0 mmol/l or 2 h glucose > or = 11.1 mmol/l); the remaining 358 (94.5%) had hyperglycaemia in the impaired glucose tolerance range (fasting glucose < 7.0 and 2 h glucose > or = 7.8 mmol/l and < 11.1 mmol/l). Using the 1985 criteria (fasting or 2 h glucose > or = 7.8 mmol/l), 378 cases of GDM were found, 15 in the diabetes range and 363 in the impaired glucose tolerance range. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of GDM is minimally altered by the new WHO definition. Although GDM is a common condition, the vast majority of the cases have hyperglycaemia in the range considered impaired glucose tolerance outside pregnancy.     

Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and intermediate glucose abnormalities in obese patients based on ADA (1997) and WHO (1985) criteria.

AIM: To assess the accuracy of the 1997 ADA criteria for diagnosing diabetes mellitus and related glucose disturbances in comparison with the reference WHO 1985 criteria in obese subjects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In 286 men and 881 women, 15-84 years of age, with obesity (body mass index (BMI) > or = 30 kg/m2), an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was carried out according to WHO standard. Patients were classified into three categories of glucose tolerance using WHO 1985 (Normal Glucose Tolerance (NGT), Impaired Glucose Tolerance (IGT) and Diabetes Mellitus (DM)) and ADA (Normal Fasting Glucose (NFG), Impaired Fasting Glucose (IFG) and DM) criteria. Prevalence of each category was compared and agreement between the two classifications was assessed. The relation between fasting plasma glucose value and diabetes, as diagnosed by WHO 1985 criteria, was studied using various regression models, cumulative frequency curves, Finch method and ROC curve. RESULTS: Compared with WHO 1985, ADA criteria strongly underestimated the prevalence rate of diabetes (3.7% vs. 10.6%) and intermediate glucose abnormalities (6.0% vs. 22.4%). Agreement between the two classifications was poor (kappa = 0.23). Moreover, many patients defined as glucose-intolerant by the WHO 1985 criteria were shifted to a more favourable metabolic status by ADA criteria. Thus, ADA criteria failed to detect 69% of WHO diabetic patients and 89% with IGT were considered as normal. According to the method, cut-off value of fasting blood glucose for detecting WHO 1985-diagnosed diabetes varied widely, from 5.3 to 6.3 mmol/l and none was satisfactory because of poor sensitivity and positive predictive value. CONCLUSION: The ADA criteria do not appear to be a good substitute for those of the WHO 1985 at identifying diabetes and intermediate glucose abnormalities in an obese population. Since it appears impossible to determine a reliable cut-off value for fasting blood glucose to identify diabetic obese subjects with sufficient sensitivity, our results justify the retention of the OGTT in clinical practice or for epidemiological studies.     

The prevalence of diabetes, association with cardiovascular risk factors and implications of diagnostic criteria (ADA 1997 and WHO 1998) in a 1996 community-based population study in Hong Kong Chinese. Hong Kong Cardiovascular Risk Factor Steering Committee. American Diabetes Association.

AIMS: While the American Diabetes Association (ADA) 1997 diagnostic criteria advocate the use of fasting plasma glucose only, the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria retain the use of the standard oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). The present study evaluated the relative merit of the respective diagnostic criteria in Chinese. METHODS: Data collected for the Hong Kong Cardiovascular Risk Factor Prevalence Study was analysed. This was a representative population-based study, conducted from 1995 to 1996 among 2,900 Chinese subjects aged 25-74 years using a 75-g OGTT. RESULTS: The prevalence of diabetes (known plus unknown) was 6.2% (95% confidence interval 5.3-7.1%), 9.2% (8.1-10.3%), and 9.8% (8.7-10.9%) based on ADA 1997, WHO 1985 and WHO 1998 criteria, respectively, with a very high prevalence in older subjects. The 2,451 subjects classified as normal under ADA 1997 criteria were heterogenous: 15.3% had impaired glucose tolerance; 2.1% had diabetes under WHO 1998 criteria. These latter two smaller groups had cardiovascular risk profiles comparable to that found among the impaired fasting glucose subjects (under ADA), but worse than that among the concordant normal glucose tolerance subjects. CONCLUSIONS: The ADA criteria underestimate both diabetes prevalence and cardiovascular risk in this population. Hence fasting glucose alone is an inadequate approach and OGTT should be retained to identify at-risk individuals in both clinical diagnosis and epidemiological studies.     

Comparison of WHO and ADA criteria for diagnosis of glucose status in adults

The aim was to compare the 1997 American Diabetes Association (ADA) and 1985 and 1998 World Health Organisation (WHO) criteria for the diagnosis of diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) by ethnicity and cardiovascular risk factors. We analysed the oral glucose tolerance tests carried out in a cross-sectional survey of 5816 New Zealand workers aged 22-78 years (4211 men, 1605 women) carried out between 1988 and 1990. Prevalence of diabetes was similar using ADA (3.1%) compared with the 1998 WHO criteria (3.0%). The overall prevalence rate of diabetes using the 1985 WHO criteria was only 1.5%. The prevalence rate of impaired fasting glucose (IFG) was the lowest in Europeans (7.3%) and highest in Asians (15.0%). The overall weighted kappa for agreement between the 1997 ADA and 1998 WHO criteria was moderate (0.59), but varied between ethnic groups. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors were approximately more adverse across groups with IFG, normal (ADA)/IGT (WHO), IFG/IGT and diabetes compared with normal subjects. Compared to those with IFG, participants with the normal (ADA)/IGT (WHO) criteria differed in fasting and 2-h glucose, diastolic blood pressure, and urinary albumin levels, and the proportions of males and number with hypertension, but had a significantly adverse pattern of CVD risk factors compared to those with normal glycaemia. The 1988 WHO criteria using the OGTT provides additional information for classifying various categories of glucose intolerance that is not captured using the 1997 ADA fasting glucose criteria alone.     

Translation of the recommendations for the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus into daily clinical practice in a primary health care setting

AIMS: to assess the implementation of 1985 recommendations for the diagnosis of diabetes (World Health Organization [WHO]) in a primary care setting, and the physician's attitude toward the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (DM). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Subjects with a fasting plasma glucose (FPG)>6.1 mmol/l (> or =110 mg/dl) and with previously unknown glucose tolerance status were identified retrospectively in a primary health care center during a 45-month period. The following variables were evaluated: anthropometric parameters, fasting plasma glucose and oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) values, registration of a diagnosis of diabetes in clinical records, smoking status, lipid profile and blood pressure. RESULTS: 1181 subjects with a FPG>6.1 mmol/l were identified (target population): 171 with a FPG>7.8 mmol/l and 1010 with a FPG between 6.1 and 7.7 mmol/l. In the latter group, an OGTT was performed in 553 subjects (54.8%) (173 yielded a diagnosis of diabetes). During the study period, diabetes was diagnosed in 29.1% (n=344) of the target population. Following the 1985 WHO recommendations, a confirmatory diagnostic test was repeated in 92 (69.7%) subjects with a FPG between 7.8 and 11.0 mmol/l, and in 132 subjects (23.87%) who had already received an initial OGTT. The analysis of the diagnostic process followed by the different physicians revealed a high interindividual variability in terms of: proportion of cases diagnosed as diabetes by an OGTT (from 35.7 to 65.2), percentage of subjects with a FPG 6.1-7.7 mmol/l without an OGTT (7.33-70.27%), proportion of confirmatory OGTTs (0-57.89%), and percentage of misdiagnosed cases (1.16-6.34%). The percentage of subjects misdiagnosed was negatively correlated with the proportion of OGTT repetitions. CONCLUSIONS: 1985 WHO recommendations for the diagnosis of diabetes are only partially followed at a primary health care level. There is a high interindividual variability among physicians in the implementation of these recommendations that is associated with the misdiagnosis of diabetes.     

Incidence of Type 2 diabetes in England and its association with baseline impaired fasting glucose: the Ely study 1990-2000.

AIM: To determine the incidence of Type 2 diabetes and to examine the effect of different cut-points for impaired fasting glucose (IFG) on diabetes incidence. METHODS: Population-based longitudinal study (1990-2000) with clinical, anthropometric and biochemical measurements, including an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), in 1040 non-diabetic adults aged 40-69 years at baseline. Baseline glucose status was defined as normoglycaemia < 5.6, IFG-lower 5.6-6.0 and IFG-original 6.1-6.9 mmol/l. The all-IFG group included fasting glucose values of 5.6-6.9 mmol/l. RESULTS: The 10-year cumulative incidence of diabetes was 7.3 per 1000 person-years. Diabetes incidence was 2.4 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2, 4.8], 6.2 (4.0, 9.8) and 17.5 (12.5, 24.5) per 1000 person-years in those with normoglycaemia, IFG-lower and IFG-original, respectively. Compared with normoglycaemia, the age/sex-adjusted risk [hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CI] for incident diabetes was greatest in the IFG-original category (HR 6.9; 3.1, 15.2) and increased to a lesser degree in the IFG-lower (HR 2.5; 1.1, 5.7) and all-IFG categories (HR 4.1; 1.9, 8.7). When adjusted for confounding factors, the magnitude and direction of associations persisted, with HR 1.9, 4.4 and 2.9, for the categories IFG-lower, IFG-original and all-IFG, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes incidence is more strongly related to IFG defined as fasting glucose between 6.1 and 6.9 mmol/l than to the lower category of 5.6-6.0 mmol/l, or entire range of 5.6-6.9 mmol/l. Future studies should examine the association of IFG with cardiovascular outcomes, but for diabetes risk our study supports the use of the IFG cut-point at 6.1 mmol/l.     

The likelihood of diabetes based on the proposed definitions for impaired fasting glucose

The current study aimed to evaluate whether individuals with fasting plasma glucose (FPG) of 5.6-6.0 mmol/l has a similar risk profiles for diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) to those with FPG of 6.1-6.9 mmol/l. A community-based cross-sectional survey in Chinese adults (20-74 years) was conducted during April-July in 2002. Participants without a prior history of diabetes underwent a standardized 2-h 75 g oral glucose tolerance test. Positive likelihood ratios were calculated to estimate the odds of having diabetes or IGT for subjects with different FPG levels. Among 1856 participants, prevalence of IFG increased from 12.4 to 28.2% with the cut-off value of FPG lowered from 6.1 to 5.6 mmol/l. Individuals with FPG of 6.1-6.9 mmol/l were more obese and insulin resistant than those with FPG of 5.6-6.0 mmol/l. The positive likelihood ratio for diabetes and IGT were 1.83 (1.28-2.61) and 2.60 (1.96-3.44) in subjects with FPG of 6.1-6.9 mmol/l, and 0.54 (0.30-0.95) and 1.47 (1.11-1.95) for those with FPG of 5.6-6.0 mmol/l, respectively. In conclusion, the likelihood of diabetes and IGT was lower in subjects with FPG of 5.6-6.0 mmol/l than in those with FPG of 6.1-6.9 mmol/l. The clinical and social implication of labelling more individuals with impaired fasting glucose needs to be further studied.     

A report on the diagnosis of intermediate hyperglycemia in Korea: A pooled analysis of four community-based cohort studies

Many studies show poor agreement between fasting plasma glucose (FPG)-based and 2-h postchallenge glucose (2-h PG)-based criteria to assess glucose metabolism. We examined the rate of agreement between FPG- and 2-h PG-based criteria in the diagnosis of intermediate hyperglycemia in four representative cohort studies in South Korea and compared the clinical characteristics and biochemical parameters in subjects with impaired fasting glucose (IFG) according to their FPG values.

Of 6234 subjects from four population-based studies performed from 1993 to 2000, 4610 individuals with data from a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and no previous history of diabetes were selected. We examined the concordance rate between the FPG and 2-h PG-based criteria. We also investigated the differences in the clinical characteristics and biochemical parameters between individuals with IFG according to their FPG values.

The fasting and 2-h PG criteria had large discordance rates in the diagnosis of diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) in Korean adults. When individuals with IFG were classified into stage 1 [5.6–6.1 mmol/L (100–109 mg/dL)] and stage 2 [6.1–7.0 mmol/L (110–125 mg/dL)] IFG, individuals with stage 2 IFG are more obese and had higher blood pressure and total cholesterol and triglycerides concentrations compared with those with stage 1 IFG. In addition, more individuals with stage 2 IFG were with diabetes as determined by a 2-h PG ≥ 11.1 mmol/L (14.1% vs. 1.9%) (P < 0.05).

Considering the poorer metabolic profile and higher percentage of people with diabetes by OGTT, these data indicate that, in the Korean population, individuals with stage 2 IFG should be treated differently from those with stage 1 IFG. To detect more cases of diabetes, the OGTT is recommended for all individuals with stage 2 IFG and cases with stage 1 IFG with some additional risk factors for diabetes.     

The utility of fasting glucose for detection of prediabetes

Treatment of prediabetes attenuates progression to type 2 diabetes mellitus. The American Diabetes Association (ADA) previously defined prediabetes as either impaired fasting glucose (IFG) = 6.1 to 6.9 mmol/L (110-125 mg/dL) and/or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) (2-hour postload glucose of 7.8-11.0 mmol/L [140-199 mg/dL]). For practical reasons, fasting plasma glucose (FPG) is commonly used for diabetes screening. Recently, the ADA lowered the fasting glucose threshold value for IFG from 110 to 100 mg/dL. Our objective was to determine the utility of FPG alone for detecting prediabetes in African Americans. Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) data from a cohort of 304 young adult African American men and women were examined. We calculated prediabetes prevalence using the previous ADA criteria and examined the effect of lowering the IFG threshold value for IFG to 100 mg/dL. The prediabetes prevalence in this cohort using the previous ADA criteria was 20.4% (n = 62). Of the 62 cases, 8 had IFG, 45 had IGT, and 9 had IFG together with IGT. Fasting plasma glucose testing alone detected 17 (27.4%) prediabetic cases, whereas a complete OGTT detected 54 (87.1%). Lowering the IFG threshold value to FPG = 100 mg/dL identified 13 of the 45 IGT-only cases. However, this lower IFG threshold increased prediabetes prevalence in the overall cohort from 20.4% to 31.9%. In conclusion, in young adult African Americans, an ethnic group at high risk for developing diabetes, FPG testing alone may be inadequate for diagnosing prediabetes. Until alternative strategies are identified, an OGTT is presently the best method for detecting the prediabetic condition in these high-risk patients.     

循证医学对糖尿病诊断的贡献及目前存在的分歧

主要根据几项探讨负荷后血糖水平与糖尿病特征性视网膜病变发生率之间关系的前瞻性流行病学研究，美国国家糖尿病数据组（NDDG）/世界卫生组织（WHO）（1979/1980）提出了以口服葡萄糖耐量试验（OGTT）2h血糖水平作为糖尿病诊断的依据。得到全球的公认。美国糖尿病学会（ADA）/WHO（1997/1999）根据20世纪80年代初以后多项OGTT2h血糖与空腹血糖（FPG）水平之间相互关系的流行病学研究，将糖尿病FPG诊断标准下调至7.0mmol/L，但对是否应用OGTT于糖尿病的诊断存在分歧，有待更多的循证医学研究予以解决。     

Random capillary plasma glucose measurement in the screening of diabetes mellitus in high-risk subjects in Thailand

To assess the usefulness of random capillary plasma glucose (RCPG) measurement in screening for diabetes mellitus in high-risk subjects, a RCPG measurement and a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) were performed in 684 women and 164 men, aged 16-76 years (mean+/-SD: 41.9+/-11.3 years). Risk factors included family history of diabetes in first degree relatives (53.8%), obesity (BMI > or =27 kg/m(2)) in 37.9%, dyslipidemia (78.4%), hypertension, i.e. BP > or =140/90 mmHg (28.5%), and history of gestational diabetes mellitus (16.6%). According to the 1997 ADA/1998 WHO Consultation criteria for a full OGTT, 118 cases (13.9%) were found to have diabetes. Each of 19 cases with RCPG > or =13.3 mmol/l had diabetes according to OGTT, 4.7% of 427 cases with RCPG<6.1 mmol/l had diabetes. Among 402 subjects with RCPG between 6.1 and <13.3 mmol/l, 19.7% were found to have diabetes. Thus, 446 (52.6%) of 848 subjects would have been saved from OGTT if RCPG was used as a screening test, in comparison to 33.1% if the cutpoints for RCPG (12.2 and 5.5 mmol/l) recommended by WHO Study Group (1985)/WHO Consultation (1998) were applied. Therefore, RCPG measurement is a useful screening test for the screening of diabetes mellitus in high-risk subjects.     

Comparison of ADA and WHO criteria for the diagnosis of diabetes in elderly Koreans.

AIMS: This study was conducted to compare the prevalence and cardiovascular risk factors of different categories of glucose tolerance in the elderly Korean population using World Health Organization (WHO) and American Diabetes Association (ADA) criteria. METHODS: This study included 1456 non-diabetic subjects over the age of 60 years, selected from a cross-sectional study, which was conducted in 1999 in Seoul, Korea. Fasting and post-challenge 2-h plasma glucose, insulin levels, body mass index (BMI), waist-hip ratio (WHR), blood pressure, and lipid profiles were examined. Prevalence of glucose tolerance categories and the level of agreement (kappa statistics) were obtained using WHO 2-h criteria and ADA fasting criteria. Comparison of cardiovascular risk factors among several concordant and discordant glucose intolerance groups was done. RESULTS: The prevalence rates of newly diagnosed diabetes of elderly men defined by WHO 2-h criteria and ADA fasting criteria were 11.8% and 4.8%, respectively. That of elderly women was 8.1% by WHO 2-h criteria and 3.1% by ADA fasting criteria. The prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) by WHO criteria was also higher than that of impaired fasting glucose (IFG) by ADA criteria (23.5% vs. 10.0% men, 23.7% vs. 7.5% women). The level of agreement between ADA fasting criteria and WHO 2-h criteria was low (weighted kappa = 0.228 men, weighted kappa = 0.301 women). The concordant diabetic women by both ADA fasting criteria and WHO 2-h criteria showed higher BMI, WHR, diastolic blood pressure, total cholesterol and triglyceride levels than concordant normal subjects. However, the isolated post-challenge hyperglycaemia (IPH) women group was not different significantly from the concordant normal women group except in BMI. CONCLUSIONS: Our results clearly show that the 1997 ADA fasting criteria are less sensitive for diagnosing diabetes than oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT)-based WHO criteria in elderly Koreans. Also, there is a poor agreement of different categories of glucose tolerance between ADA and WHO criteria; therefore, the OGTT remains a valuable test in diagnosing diabetes and classifying various categories of glucose intolerance, especially in elderly Koreans.     

Comparison of the fasting and the 2-h glucose criteria for diabetes in different Asian cohorts

Aims/hypothesis. The American Diabetes Association recommended that only a single fasting plasma glucose of greater than or equal to 7.0 mmol/l should be used for diagnosing diabetes in epidemiological studies and did not recommend using a 2-h oral glucose tolerance test. We evaluated the effect of diagnostic changes on the prevalence of diabetes and on the choice of subjects diagnosed with diabetes. Methods. Existing epidemiological data collected from Asian people between 30 and 89 years of age, was re-analysed separately in 11 population-based studies (n = 17 666), 6 pre-selected hyperglycaemic cohorts (n = 12 221) and one suspected diabetic cohort (n = 8 382). Results. Among the 11 population-based studies, the new fasting glucose criteria resulted in an overall reduction of 1.8 % in the prevalence of diabetes, which ranged from a reduction of 4.8 % to an increase of 1.7 % in the different studies. Of 1215 subjects diagnosed with diabetes by either criteria, only 449 met both criteria, a concordance of 37 %. More than half of the diabetic subjects had isolated post-challenge hyperglycaemia and three quarters of the subjects with impaired glucose tolerance, according to the 2-h glucose criteria, were normal according to the fasting glucose criteria. Subjects diagnosed as diabetic based only on the 2-h glucose criteria were, on average, older than those with diabetes according to the fasting criteria. Conclusion/interpretation. The fasting and the 2-h glucose criteria diagnose different groups of subjects. It would therefore be inappropriate to use the fasting glucose criteria alone for screening diabetes in Asian populations. [Diabetologia (2000) 43: 1470–1475] Received: 2 June 2000 and in revised form: 27 July 2000     

A postnatal fasting plasma glucose is useful in determining which women with gestational diabetes should undergo a postnatal oral glucose tolerance test.

AIMS: It is recommended that women with gestational diabetes (GDM) should have a 6-week postnatal oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). As this test may be unpleasant, time-consuming and has resource implications, we evaluated whether the 6-week postnatal fasting glucose could be used to determine which women should undergo an OGTT. METHODS: All women with GDM, diagnosed according to the World Health Organization criteria, who were delivered at the Princess Anne Hospital, Southampton between May 2000 and May 2002, were recommended to have an OGTT. The results of the fasting plasma glucose concentration were assessed in relation to the 2-h glucose value. RESULTS: One-hundred and fifty-two women with GDM were delivered. Thirty (19.7%) women refused an OGTT or failed to attend. In the 122 OGTTs, three (2.4%; 95% confidence interval 0.8, 7) women had diabetes, three had impaired glucose tolerance and four had impaired fasting glycaemia. No woman with a normal test had fasting glucose of > or =6.0 mmol/l. Fasting glucose was correlated with the 2-h glucose (r=0.62, P<0.0001). Only 10 (8.1%) of the OGTTs would have been performed if only women with fasting glucose of > or =6.0 mmol/l underwent the test. The sensitivity and specificity of this approach for the diagnosis of postnatal diabetes is 100% and 94%, respectively. Linear regression methods indicate that it would miss fewer than three in 10 000 cases. CONCLUSIONS: In our population, a 6-week postnatal fasting plasma glucose is useful in determining which women with gestational diabetes should undergo an OGTT. Consequently we now perform OGTT only in women whose postnatal fasting plasma glucose is > or =6.0 mmol/l.     

Undiagnosed diabetes and impaired glucose regulation in adult Ghanaians using the ADA and WHO diagnostic criteria

Fasting glucose and oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) criteria for glucose homeostasis were compared in a cross-sectional cluster, community study in Accra, Ghana. A total of 4636 subjects without prior diagnosis of diabetes had fasting plasma glucose, 2-hour OGTT and measurement of cardiovascular risk factors. Mean age of subjects was 44.2 years; 39.1% of subjects were males. The overall prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes ascertained with both criteria was 4.5% (n=209). The prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes by fasting (3,2%) and OGTT (3.1%) criteria were similar (p>0.05). The prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) (15.8%) was higher than that of impaired fasting glucose (IFG) (10.7%). Only 56.5% (n=83) of subjects with diabetes by fasting criteria also had diabetes by OGTT criteria. Sixty-two subjects (42.8%) with diabetes by OGTT had normal or impaired fasting glucose. There was poor agreement between the two diagnostic criteria (kappa=0.31). The concordant normoglycaemic group was the youngest and had the lowest body-mass indey (BMI), waist girth, waist-hip ratio (WHR), total cholesterol, and systolic and diastolic blood pressures. The concordant diabetic group, in contrast, had the highest BMI, waist girth, WHR, total cholesterol and triglyceride levels. Both systems gave similar undiagnosed diabetes rates bur dissimilar IFG and IGT rates. There was poor agreement between the two diagnostic criteria. Diagnostic criteria influenced cardiovascular risk factors. A case may be made for using both criteria in order to ascertain all “diabetes” and all “at-risk” subjects. Received: 4 January 2001 / Accepted in revised form: 18 January 2002     

Post-partum reclassification of glucose tolerance in women previously diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus.

AIMS: To re-evaluate post-partum screening; fasting plasma glucose (FPG) vs. oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in Caucasian women with previous gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). METHODS: Once breast-feeding had finished, an OGTT was performed in 120 women with previous GDM. They were classified according to World Health Organization (WHO) 1985 and American Diabetes Association (ADA) 1997 criteria. The kappa-statistic measure of agreement was used to compared both diagnostic categories. A receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve studied the FPG as a test to detect abnormal glucose tolerance. RESULTS: Identical diabetes prevalence (2%) but quite different intermediate categories (12% impaired glucose tolerance vs. 3% impaired fasting glucose) were observed with both criteria. The kappa-statistic (scaled from 0 to 1) was 0.38 (fair agreement), P = 0.000. The ROC curve area of the FPG was 0.65. CONCLUSIONS: FPG is an unsatisfactory method of evaluating the glucose tolerance of Caucasian women with previous GDM. OGTT may be a better test for such a purpose.     

The prevalence of diabetes mellitus and impaired fasting glucose/glycaemia (IFG) in suburban and rural Nepal-the communities--based cross-sectional study during the democratic movements in 1990

A rising prevalence of Type 2 diabetes and impaired fasting glucose/glycaemia (IFG) was recently reported in the urban areas of Nepal by Singh and Bhattarai [D.L. Singh, M.D. Bhattarai, High prevalence of diabetes and impaired fasting glycaemia in urban Nepal, Diabet. Med. 20 (2003) 170-171] in the first population-based study based on the revised diagnostic criteria of ADA-1997 and WHO-1998. In comparison with our community-based survey done in 1990 in suburban and rural areas of Nepal, the current data show a surprisingly rapid increase in the prevalence of diabetes in the Nepalese population. In our 1990 study, diabetes and IFG, respectively, were present in 1.4 and 2.5% of people > or =20 years old in suburban village (Bhadrakali) compared with 0.3 and 0.7% in a rural village (Kotyang). In a short communication, Singh and Bhattarai found the rates to be 14.6 and 9.1% in urban areas, and 2.5 and 1.3% in rural areas. This phenomena appears to have been influenced more by rapid urbanization and changes in lifestyles after the ongoing democratic movements that have taken place since 1990 in Nepal. Moreover, our new analysis of the data provide baseline features for the planning of health care policy and establishment of medical priorities in modern day Nepal.