The fate of labelled15N urea and ammonium nitrate applied to a winter wheat crop

Labelled urea or ammonium nitrate was applied to winter wheat growing on a loamy soil in Northern France. Two applications of fertilizer were given: 50 kg N ha^–1 at tillering (early March) and 110 kg N ha^–1 at the beginning of stem elongation (mid-April). The kinetics of urea hydrolysis, nitrification of ammonium and the disappearance of inorganic nitrogen were followed at frequent intervals. Inorganic nitrogen soon disappeared, mainly immobilized by soil microflora and absorbed by the crop. Net immobilization of fertilizer N occured at a very similar rate for urea and ammonium nitrate. Maximum immobilization (16 kg N ha¹) was found at harvest for the first dressing and at anthesis for the second dressing (23 kg N ha¹). During the nitrification period, the labelled ammonium pool was immobilized two to three times faster than the labelled nitrate pool. No significant net¹⁵N remineralization was found during the growth cycle.The actual denitrification and volatilization losses were probably more important than indicated from calculations made by extrapolation of fluxes measured over short intervals. However microbial immobilization was the most important of the processes which compete with plant uptake for nitrogen.     

Transformation of15N-labelled urea and its modified forms in tropical wetland rice culture

Summary The fate of 100 kg N ha^–1 applied as¹⁵N-urea and its modified forms was followed in 4 successive field-grown wetland rice crops in a vertisol. The first wet season crop recovered about 27 to 36.6% of the applied N depending upon the N source. In subsequent seasons the average uptake was very small and it gradually decreased from 1.4 to 0.5 kg N ha^–1 although about 18 to 20, 12 to 17 and 14 to 18 kg ha^–1 residual fertilizer N was available in the root zone after harvest of first, second and third crops, respectively. The average uptake of the residual fertilizer N was only 7.6% in the second crop and it decreased to 4.5% in the third and to 3.2% in the fourth crop although all these crops were adequately fertilized with unlabelled urea. The basal application of neem coated urea was more effective in controlling the leaching loss of labelled NH₄+NO₃–N than split application of uncoated urea. In the first 3 seasons in which¹⁵N was detectable, the loss of fertilizer N through leaching as NH₄+NO₃–N amounted to 0.5 kg ha^–1 from neem-coated urea, 1.5 kg from split urea and 4.1 kg from coal tar-coated urea. At the end of 4 crops, most of the labelled fertilizer N (about 69% on average) was located in the upper 0–20 cm soil layer showing very little movement beyond this depth. In the profile sampled upto 60 cm depth, totally about 13.8 kg labelled fertilizer N ha^–1 from neem-coated urea, 12.7 kg from coal-tar coated urea, and 11.8 kg from split urea were recovered. The average recovery of labelled urea-N in crops and soil during the entire experimental period ranged between 42 and 51%. After correcting for leaching losses, the remaining 47 to 56% appeared to have been lost through ammonia volatilization and denitrification.     

Nitrogen losses in puddled soils as affected by timing of water deficit and nitrogen fertilization

Erratic rainfall in rainfed lowlands and inadequate water supply in irrigated lowlands can results in alternate soil drying and flooding during a rice (Oryza sativa L.) cropping period. Effects of alternate soil drying and flooding on N loss by nitrification-denitrification have been inconsistent in previous field research. To determine the effects of water deficit and urea timing on soil NO₃ and NH₄, floodwater NO₃, and N loss from added ¹⁵N-labeled urea, a field experiment was conducted for 2 yr on an Andaqueptic Haplaquoll in the Philippines. Water regimes were continuously flooded, not irrigated from 15 to 35 d after transplanting (DT), or not irrigated from 41 to 63 DT. The nitrogen treatments in factorial combination with water regimes were no applied N and 80 kg urea-N ha^–1, either applied half basally and half at 37 DT or half at 11 DT and half at 65 DT. Water deficit at 15 to 35 DT and 41 to 63 DT, compared with continuous soil flooding, significantly reduced extractable NH₄ in the top 30-cm soil layer and resulted in significant but small (<1.0 kg N ha^–1) soil NO₃ accumulations. Soil NO₃, which accumulated during the water deficit, rapidly disappeared after reflooding. Water deficit at 15 to 35 DT, unlike that at 41 to 63 DT, increased the gaseous loss of added urea N as determined from unrecovered ¹⁵N in ¹⁵N balances. The results indicate that application of urea to young rice in saturated or flooded soil results in large, rapid losses of N (mean = 35% of applied N), presumably by NH₃ volatilization. Subsequent soil drying and flooding during the vegetative growth phase can result in additional N loss (mean = 14% of applied N), presumably by nitrification-denitrification. This additional N loss due to soil drying and flooding decreases with increasing crop age, apparently because of increased competition by rice with soil microorganisms for NH₄ and NO₃.     

Sources of N uptake by wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and N transformations in soil treated with a nitrification inhibitor (nitrapyrin)

Rates of N uptake by spring wheat as ammonium and as nitrate, and rates of nitrification, gross N immobilization and gross N mineralization were measured in a pot experiment during 84 days of growth in a clay soil. Soil treatments included an unfertilized control and addition of ¹⁵NH₄NO₃ or NH₄ ¹⁵NO₃ in the absence and presence of N-serve 24E. Incorporation of ammonium into the soil organic N pool was considerably higher in the presence compared to the absence of nitrapyrin, but the processes contributing to this effect could not be positively identified. Both dry matter and grain yield as well as N uptake by wheat were enhanced in the presence of the inhibitor in N fertilized soil, despite the increased immobilization of N. On the other hand, inhibitor application had a detrimental effect on yield and N uptake by wheat in unfertilized soil. Both ammonium and nitrate forms of inorganic N were absorbed by wheat, but nitrate uptake was dominant in the absence of the inhibitor. The uptake of N as ammonium was higher and the uptake of N as nitrate was less, both in absolute and proportional terms, in the presence compared to the absence of inhibitor. In addition, the proportion of N taken up as ammonium was higher than the proportion of N as ammonium in the available N pool up to day 56 in the inhibitor treatment, which indicated a preference for ammonium uptake by wheat. Evidence was obtained which suggested that several factors may have contributed to the positive response of wheat to inhibitor application in N fertilized soil, including reduced N losses, higher gross N mineralization and a physiological response due to the proportional increase in uptake of inorganic N as ammonium.     

Fate of urine nitrogen on mineral and peat soils in New Zealand

A field lysimeter experiment was conducted over 150 days to examine the fate of synthetic urinary nitrogen (N) applied to peat and mineral soils, with and without a water table. At the start of the winter season, synthetic urine labelled with ¹⁵N, was applied at 500 kg N ha^–1. Plant uptake, leaching losses and nitrous oxide (N₂O) fluxes were monitored. Total plant uptake ranged from 11% to 35% of the urine-N applied depending on soil type and treatment. Plant uptake of applied N was greater in the presence of a water table in the mineral soil. Nitrate-N (NO₃ ^--N) was only detected in leachates from the mineral soil, at concentrations up to 146 g NO₃ ^--N mL^–1. Presence of a water table in the mineral soil reduced leaching losses (as inorganic-N) from 47% to 6%, incrased plant uptake and doubled apparent denitrification losses. In the peat soils leaching losses of applied urine-N as inorganic-N were low (<5%). Losses of N as N₂O were greater in the mineral soil than in the peat soils, with losses of 3% and <1% of N applied respectively after 100 days. Apparent denitrification losses far exceeded N₂O losses and it is postulated that the difference could be due to dinitrogen (N₂) loss and soil entrapment of N₂.     

Relationship between rate of crop growth at date of fertiliser N application and fate of fertiliser N applied to winter wheat

To investigate the relationship between the timing of fertiliser N applications and the N use efficiency of wheat, three field experiments with ¹⁵N were set up on winter wheat, on three different soils in France. Different crop N demands on the day of fertiliser application were obtained by varying either crop densities or date of fertiliser application. Labelled ¹⁵NH₄ ¹⁵NO₃ was applied at tillering and during stem elongation. The ¹⁵N recovered from plant and soil at different dates after ¹⁵N addition and at maturity of wheat was measured. The fate of fertiliser N was rapidly determined, most of the fertiliser N accumulated in the wheat at maturity having been taken up within a few days of application. ¹⁵N recovery by the crop at final harvest (%) varied greatly (19–55% N applied) according to crop density, soil type and date of application. It was linearly related to the instantaneous crop growth rate calculated at the day of ¹⁵N application. The amount of fertiliser N immobilised in the soil was constant at 20 kg N ha⁻¹, for all soil types and crop densities. Because residual mineral ¹⁵N in the soil at harvest was negligible and immobilisation was constant, the level of total ¹⁵N measured in the different N pools (soil+plant) reflected the% ¹⁵N uptake by the plant. There was consequently a negative linear relationship between the percentage of ¹⁵N not recovered for measurement, and crop growth rate (i.e. crop N demand) at date of fertiliser application. These results suggest that crop N demand at the time of N application determines the ability of the crop to compete for N with other processes, and may be a major factor determining the division of N between soil and crop. This revised version was published online in June 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Abiotic immobilization of nitrate in two soils of relic <Emphasis Type="Italic">Abies pinsapo</Emphasis>-fir forests under Mediterranean climate

Evidence for abiotic immobilization of nitrogen (N) in soil is accumulating, but remains controversial. Identifying the fate of N from atmospheric deposition is important for understanding the N cycle of forest ecosystems. We studied soils of two Abies pinsapo fir forests under Mediterranean climate seasonality in southern Spain—one with low N availability and the other with symptoms of N saturation. We hypothesized that biotic and abiotic immobilization of nitrate (NO₃ ⁻) would be lower in soils under these forests compared to more mesic temperate forests, and that the N saturated stand would have the lowest rates of NO₃ ⁻ immobilization. Live and autoclaved soils were incubated with added ¹⁵NO₃ ⁻ (10 μg N g⁻¹ dry soil; 99% enriched) for 24 h, and the label was recovered as total dissolved-N, NO₃ ⁻, ammonium (NH₄ ⁺), or dissolved organic-N (DON). To evaluate concerns about possible iron interference in analysis of NO₃ ⁻ concentrations, both flow injection analysis (FIA) and ion chromatography (IC) were applied to water extracts, soluble iron was measured in both water and salt extracts, and standard additions of NO₃ ⁻ to salt extracts were analyzed. Good agreement between FIA and IC analysis, low concentrations of soluble Fe, and 100% (±3%) recovery of NO₃ ⁻ standard additions all pointed to absence of an interference problem for NO₃ ⁻ quantification. On average, 85% of the added ¹⁵NO₃ ⁻ label was recovered as ¹⁵NO₃ ⁻, which supports our hypothesis that rates of immobilization were generally low in these soils. A small amount (mean = 0.06 μg N g⁻¹ dry soil) was recovered as ¹⁵NH₄ ⁺ in live soils and none in sterilized soils. Mean recovery as DO¹⁵N ranged from 0.6 to 1.5 μg N g⁻¹ dry soil, with no statistically significant effect of sterilization or soil type, indicating that this was an abiotic process that occurred at similar rates in both soils. These results demonstrate a detectable, but modest rate of abiotic immobilization of NO₃ ⁻ to DON, supporting our first hypothesis. These mineral soils may not have adequate carbon availability to support the regeneration of reducing microsites needed for high rates of NO₃ ⁻ reduction. Our second hypothesis regarding lower expected abiotic immobilization in soils from the N-saturated site was not supported. The rates of N deposition in this region may not be high enough to have swamped the capacity for soil NO₃ ⁻ immobilization, even in the stand showing some symptoms of N saturation. A growing body of evidence suggests that soil abiotic NO₃ ⁻ immobilization is common, but that rates are influenced by a combination of factors, including the presence of plentiful available carbon, reduced minerals in anaerobic microsites and adequate NO₃ ⁻ supply.     

Role of nitrification and denitrification for NO metabolism in soil

Release and uptake of NO was measured in a slightly alkaline (pH 7.8) and an acidic (pH 4.7) cambisol. In the alkaline soil under aerobic conditions, NO release was stimulated by ammonium and inhibited by nitrapyrin. Nitrate accumulated simultaneously and was also inhibited by nitrapyrin.¹⁵NO was released after fertilization with¹⁵NH₄NO₃ but not with NH₄ ¹⁵NO₃. The results indicate that in aerobic alkaline cambisol NO was mainly produced during nitrification of ammonium. The results were different under anaerobic conditions and also in the acidic cambisol. There, NO release was stimulated by nitrate and not by ammonium, and was inhibited by chlorate and not by nitrapyrin indicating that NO production was exclusively due to reduction of nitrate. The results were confirmed by¹⁵NO being released mainly from NH₄ ¹⁵NO₃ rather than from¹⁵NH₄NO₃. The observed patterns of NO release were explained by the NO production processes being stimulated by either ammonium or nitrate in the two different soils, whereas the NO consumption processes being only stimulated by nitrate. NO release was larger than N₂O release, but both were small compared to changes in concentrations of soil ammonium or nitrate.(*request for offprints)     

Clinoptilolite zeolite and cellulose amendments to reduce ammonia volatilization in a calcareous sandy soil

Leaching of nitrate (NO₃ ^–) below the root zone and gaseous losses of nitrogen (N) such as ammonia (NH₃) volatilization, are major mechanisms of N loss from agricultural soils. New techniques to minimize such losses are needed to maximize N uptake efficiency and minimize production costs and the risk of potential N contamination of ground and surface waters. The effects of cellulose (C), clinoptilolite zeolite (CZ), or a combination of both (C+CZ) on NH₃ volatilization and N transformation in a calcareous Riviera fine sand (loamy, siliceous, hyperthermic, Arenic Glossaqualf) from a citrus grove were investigated in a laboratory incubation study. Ammonia volatilization from NH₄NO₃ (AN), (NH₄)₂SO₄(AS), and urea (U) applied at 200 mg N kg^–1 soil decreased by 2.5-, 2.1- and 0.9-fold, respectively, with cellulose application at 15 g kg^–1 and by 4.4-, 2.9- and 3.0-fold, respectively, with CZ application at 15 g kg^–1 as compared with that from the respective sources without the amendments. Application of cellulose plus CZ (each at 15 g kg^–1) was the most effective in decreasing NH₃ volatilization. Application of cellulose increased the microbial biomass, which was responsible for immobilization of N, and thus decreased volatilization loss of NH₃–N. The effect of CZ, on the other hand, may be due to increased retention of NH₄ in the ion-exchange sites. The positive effect of interaction between cellulose and CZ amendment on microbial biomass was probably due to improved nutrient retention and availability to microorganisms in the soil. Thus, the amendments provide favorable conditions for microbial growth. These results indicate that soil amendment of CZ or CZ plus organic materials such as cellulose has great potential in reducing fertilizer N loss in sandy soils.     

Fertilizer nitrogen budget of Na15NO3 and (15NH4)2SO4 split-applied to winter wheat in microplots on a loam soil

Labelled fertilizer N applied to winter wheat as Na¹⁵NO₃ and (¹⁵NH₄)₂SO₄ at a total N dressing of 100kg ha⁻¹ was used in a microplot balance study to investigate the fate of each split fraction at three growth stages: end of tillering, heading and beginning of flowering. Results indicated that while the percentage utilization of the applied N by the grain and total crop increased considerably from the first to the third split application, these values diminished steadily in the straw. Grain recovery values for the first, second and third split applications were 34.2%, 51.5% and 55.7% for the NO₃ and 32.3%, 48.4% and 52.5% for the NH₄ carrier, respectively. The corresponding recovery values for the whole plant were 54.6%, 67.8% and 69.9% for the NO₃ and 51.7%, 63.5% and 66.1% for the NH₄ carrier. A greater proportion of the fertilizer N applied at the end of tillering stage was found in the vegetative plant components as compared with the grain. The reverse occurred for the N applied at the heading and at the beginning of the flowering stages. The residual fertilizer N found in the soil amounted to 18.0%, 10.4% and 11.6% of the applied NO₃−N and to 22.5%, 12.7% and 15.2% of the applied NH₄−N for the respective split applications. No differences were found for each split application between the two carriers as far as the unaccounted fertilizer N was concerned. The losses were 26.6%, 22.3% and 18.6% of the applied N for the three split applications, respectively. The application of fertilizer N did not lead to any increase in soil N uptake by the crop.     

Soil acidification as caused by the nitrogen uptake pattern of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris)

Three-year-old Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) trees were grown on a sandy forest soil in pots, with the objective to determine their NH₄/NO₃ uptake ratio and proton efflux. N was supplied in three NH₄-N/NO₃-N ratios, 3:1, 1:1 and 1:3, either as ¹⁵NH₄+¹⁴NO₃ or as ¹⁴NH₄+¹⁵NO₃. Total N and ¹⁵N acquisition of different plant parts were measured. Averaged over the whole tree, the NH₄/NO₃ uptake ratios throughout the growing season were found to be 4.2, 2.5, and 1.5 for the three application ratios, respectively. The excess cation-over-anion uptake value (C_a-A_a) appeared to be linearly related to the natural logarithm of the NH₄/NO₃ uptake ratio. Further, this uptake ratio was related to the NH₄/NO₃ ratio of the soil solution. From these relationship it was estimated that Scots pine exhibits an acidifying uptake pattern as long as the contribution of nitrate to the N nutrition is lower than 70%. Under field circumstances root uptake may cause soil acidification in the topsoil, containing the largest part of the root system, and soil alkalization in deeper soil layers.     

Crop uptake and leaching of 15N applied in ruminant slurry with selectively labelled faeces and urine fractions

Two animal slurries either labelled with ¹⁵N in the urine or in the faeces fraction, were produced by feeding a sheep with unlabelled and ¹⁵N-labelled hay and collecting faeces and urine separately. The slurries were applied (12 g total N ^-2) to a coarse sand and a sandy loam soil confined in lysimeters and growing spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L). Reference lysimeters without slurry were supplied with¹⁵ NH₄ ¹⁵NO³ corresponding to the inorganic N applied with the slurries (6 g N m^-2). In the second year, all lysimeters received unlabelled mineral fertilizer (6 g N m^-2) and grew spring barley. N harvested in the two crops (grain + straw) and the loss of nitrate by leaching were determined. ¹⁵N in the urine fraction was less available for crop uptake than mineral fertilizer ¹⁵N. The first barley crop on the sandy loam removed 49% of the ¹⁵N applied in mineral fertilizer and 36% of that applied with urine. The availability of fertilizer ¹⁵N (36%) and urine¹⁵ N (32%) differed less on the coarse sand. Of the¹⁵ N added with the faeces fraction, 12–14% was taken up by the barley crop on the two soils. N mineralized from faeces compensated for the reduced availability of urine N providing a similar or higher crop N uptake in manured lysimeters compared with mineral fertilized ones.About half of the total N uptake in the first crop originated from the N applied either as slurry or mineral fertilizer. The remaining N was derived from the soil N pool. Substantially smaller but similar proportions of¹⁵ N from faeces, urine and fertilizer were found in the second crop. The similar recoveries indicated a slow mineralization rate of the residual faeces N since more faeces was left in the soil after the first crop.More N was lost by leaching from manured lysimeters but as a percentage of N applied, losses were similar to those from mineral fertilizer. During the first and second winter, 3–5% and 1–3%, respectively, of the ¹⁵N in slurry and mineral fertilizer was leached as nitrate. Thus slurry N applied in spring just before sowing did not appear to be more prone to loss by nitrate leaching than N given in mineral fertilizer. Slurry N accounted for a higher proportion of the N leached, however, because more N was added in this treatment.     

Effects of field fertilizer practices on labeled ammonium-nitrogen transformations and its utilization by winter wheat

Summary Field experiments with winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) were conducted in two years at two locations using¹⁵N-enriched (NH₄)₂SO₄ on Smolan silt loam (Pachic Argiustoll) and Ost loam (Typic Arguistoll) soils. The objective was to relate differences in crop utilization of fertilizer to movement and transformations of the N in a complete factorial experiment having fall and spring applications, banded and broadcast, with and without nitrapyrin. Plant uptake of the 60 kg N/ha applied varied from 31% to 62% with greatest uptake when fertilizer was banded in the spring without nitrapyrin and least uptake from fall and spring broadcast treatments using nitrapyrin. Analysis of single factor effects showed greater crop contents of fertilizer N for spring than fall applications. That was related to immobilization of the applied N. Much more fertilizer N was in inorganic forms during the period of rapid wheat growth with spring applications than with fall. Banding the fertilizer at a depth of 0.05 m resulted in greater plant uptake than broadcasting or banding it on the soil surface. A significant portion of the applied N was immobilized near the point of application. That limited the downward movement of the N placed on the surface, making it less available to plant roots than the N placed 0.05 m deep where soil moisture was more favorable. Use of nitrapyrin resulted in lowered amounts of fertilizer N as NO₃-until mid-May for fall treatments and until harvest with spring treatments. That appeared to be the reason for lowered plant uptake when nitrapyrin was used. Published in memory of Professor R V Olson and over 40 years of contributions and service to agriculture and soil science (1919–1985).     

天山林区不同类型群落土壤氮素对冻融过程的动态响应

季节性冻融过程对北方温带森林土壤氮素的转化与流失具有重要影响,但不同类型群落对冻融过程响应的差异尚不明确。通过在林地、草地、灌丛上设置系列监测样地,采用原位培养的方法,利用林冠遮挡形成的自然雪被厚度差异,监测分析了冻融期天山林区不同群落表层土壤(0—15 cm)的氮素动态及净氮矿化速率间的差异。结果表明:(1)不同类型群落土壤的铵态氮(NH+4-N)含量、微生物量氮(MBN)含量基本与土壤(5 cm)温度呈正相关,深冻期林地土壤铵态氮含量低于其他群落类型而硝态氮含量高于其他群落类型;(2)硝态氮(NO-3-N)为天山林区季节性冻融期间土壤矿质氮的主体,占比达78.4%。灌丛土壤硝态氮流失风险较大,融化末期较融化初期灌丛土壤硝态氮含量下降了64.6%;(3)冻融时期对整体氮素矿化速率影响显著,群落类型对氨化速率影响显著;(4)天山林区土壤氮素在冻结期主要以氮固持为主。通过揭示不同类型群落土壤氮素对冻融格局的响应,能够助益于对北方林区冬季土壤氮素循环的认识。     

Mineralization-immobilization and plant uptake of nitrogen as influenced by the spatial distribution of cattle slurry in soils of different texture

The effect of incorporating cattle slurry in soil, either by mixing or by simulated injection into a hollow in soil, on the ryegrass uptake of total N and ¹⁵NH₄ ⁺-N was determined in three soils of different texture. The N accumulation in Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum L.) from slurry N and from an equivalent amount of NH₄ ⁺-N in (¹⁵NH₄) SO₄ (control) was measured during 6 months of growth in pots. After this period the total recovery of labelled N in the top soil plus herbage was similar in the slurry and the control treatments. This indicated that gaseous losses from slurry NH₄ ⁺-N were insignificant. Consequently, the availability of slurry N to plants was mainly influenced by the mineralization-immobilization processes. The apparent utilization of slurry NH₄ ⁺-N mixed into soil was 7%, 14% and 24% lower than the utilization of (NH₄)₂SO₄-N in a sand soil, a sandy loam soil and a loam soil, respectively. Thus, the net immobilization of N due to slurry application increased with increasing soil clay content, whereas the recovery in plants of ¹⁵N-labelled NH₄ ⁺-N from slurry was similar on the three soils. A parallel incubation experiment showed that the immobilization of slurry N occurred within the first week after slurry application. The incorporation of slurry N by simulated injection increased the plant uptake of both total and labelled N compared to mixing the slurry into the soil. The apparent utilization of injected slurry NH₄ ⁺-N was 7% higher, 8% lower and 4% higher than the utilization of (NH₄)₂SO₄-N in the sand, the sandy loam and the loam soil, respectively. It is concluded that the spatial distribution of slurry in soil influenced the net mineralization of N to the same degree as did the soil type.     

Contributions to nitrogen leaching and pasture uptake by autumn-applied dairy effluent and ammonium fertilizer labeled with 15N isotope

The objective of this study was to compare the N leaching loss and pasture N uptake from autumn-applied dairy shed effluent and ammonium fertilizer (NH₄Cl) labeled with ¹⁵N, using intact soil lysimeters (80 cm diameter, 120 cm depth). The soil used was a sandy loam, and the pasture was a mixture of perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne) and white clover (Trifolium repens). The DSE and NH₄Cl were applied twice annually in autumn (May) and late spring (November), each at 200 kg N ha^-1. The N applied in May 1996 was labeled with ¹⁵N. The lysimeters were either spray or flood irrigated during the summer. The autumn-applied DSE resulted in lower N leaching losses compared with NH₄Cl. However, the N applied in the autumn had a higher potential for leaching than N applied in late spring. Between 4.5–8.1% of the ¹⁵N-labeled mineral N in the DSE and 15.1–18.8% of the ¹⁵N-labeled NH₄Cl applied in the autumn were leached within a year of application. Of the annual N leaching losses in the DSE treatments (16.0–26.9 kg N ha^-1), a fifth (20.3–22.9%) was from the mineral N fraction of the DSE applied in the autumn, with the remaining larger proportion from the organic fraction of the DSE, soil N and N applied in spring. In the NH₄Cl treatments, more than half (53.8–64.8%) of the annual N leaching loss (55.9–57.6 kg N ha^-1) was derived from the autumn-applied NH₄Cl. DSE was as effective as NH₄Cl in stimulating pasture production. Since only 4.4–4.5% of the annual herbage N uptake in the DSE treatment and 12.3–13.3% in the NH₄Cl treatment were derived from the autumn-applied mineral N, large proportions of the annual herbage N uptake must have been derived from the N applied in spring, the organic N fraction in the DSE, soil N and N fixed by clover. The recoveries of ¹⁵N in the herbage were similar between the DSE and the NH₄Cl treatments, but those in the leachate were over 50% less from the DSE than from the NH₄Cl treatment. The lower leaching loss of ¹⁵N in the DSE treatment was attributed to the stimulated microbial activities and increased immobilization following the application of DSE. This revised version was published online in June 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Soil nitrogen heterogeneity in a Dehesa ecosystem

The C mineralization and N transformations during the decomposition of sunflower stalks (Helianthus annuus L.) and wheat straw (Triticum aestivum L.) with and without addition of (NH₄)₂SO₄ (27.53 atom% ¹⁵N) were studied in a Vertisol. Soil samples were incubated under aerobic conditions for 224 days at 22 °C. The plant residues were added at a rate of 5.2 g kg^-1 soil. Nitrogen was applied at a rate of 50.7 mg N kg^-1 soil. Carbon dioxide emission and inorganic N content in soil were periodically determined. Gross N immobilization and remineralization were calculated on the basis of the isotopic dilution technique. At the end of the incubation period a ¹⁵N balance was established. Respectively, 68 and 45% of the applied residue-C mineralized from the sunflower stalks and wheat straw after 224 days. Both crop residues caused losses of up to 25% of added ¹⁵N after 224 days of incubation. These ¹⁵N losses were about three times larger than in the control soil, and were probably due to denitrification. The net immobilization of soil derived N following residue incorporation was largest in the case of wheat straw, depleting all soil inorganic N. In the wheat straw treatment with added (NH₄)₂SO₄ soil inorganic N remained available, resulting in an enhanced initial C mineralization and N immobilization compared to the treatment without added N. In the case of the sunflower stalks, the high inorganic N content of the stalks suppressed the effects of N addition on C mineralization and N immobilization/mineralization. Gross N immobilization amounted to 31.9 and 28.2 mg N g^-1 added C after 14 days for wheat straw and sunflower stalks, respectively. At the end of the incubation, about 35% of the newly immobilized N was remineralized in both plant residue treatments. Gross N immobilization plotted against decomposed C suggests that fairly uniform C-N relationships exist during the decomposition of divers C substrates. The results demonstrate that low fertilizer N use efficiencies may be expected in a wheat-sunflower cropping system with incorporation of crop residues, as the fertilizer N applied becomes largely immobilized in the soil organic fraction. This revised version was published online in August 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Natural 15N abundances of maize and soil amended with urea and composted pig manure

To investigate the effect of inorganic fertilizer and composted manure amendments on the N isotope composition (delta ¹⁵N) of crop and soil, maize (Zea mays L.) was cultivated under greenhouse conditions for 30, 40, 50, 60, and 70 days. Composted pig manure (delta ¹⁵N= +13.9) and urea (-2.3) were applied at 0 and 0 kg N ha^–1 (C0U0), 0 and 150 kg N ha^–1 (C0U2), 150 and 0 kg N ha^–1 (C2U0), and 75 and 75 kg N ha^–1 (C1U1), respectively. The delta ¹⁵N of total soil-N was not affected by both amendments, but delta ¹⁵N of NH⁺ ₄ and NO^– ₃ provided some information on the N isotope fractionation in soil. During the early growth stage, significant differences (P < 0.05) in delta ¹⁵N among maize subjected to different treatments were observed. After 30 days of growth, the delta ¹⁵N values of maize were +6.6 for C0U0, +1.1 for C0U2, +7.7 for C2U0, and +4.5 for C1U1. However, effects of urea and composted manure application on maize delta ¹⁵N progressively decreased with increasing growth period, probably due to isotope fractionation accompanying N losses and increased uptake of soil-derived N by maize. After 70 days of growth, delta ¹⁵N of leaves and grains of maize amended with composted pig manure were significantly (P < 0.05) higher than those with urea. The temporal variations in delta ¹⁵N of maize amended with urea and composted manure indicate that plant delta ¹⁵N is generally not a good tracer for N sources applied to field. Our data can be used in validation of delta ¹⁵N fractionation models in relation to N source inputs.     

Fate of 15N-labelled fertilizer applied to spring barley grown on soils of contrasting nutrient status

An experiment with ¹⁵N-labelled fertilizer was superimposed on the Rothamsted Hoosfield Spring Barley Experiment, started in 1852. Labelled ¹⁵NH₄ ¹⁵NO₃ was applied in spring at (nominal) rates of 0, 48, 96 and 144 kg N ha^-1. The labelled fertilizer was applied to microplots located within four treatments of the original experiment: that receiving farmyard manure (FYM) annually, that receiving inorganic nutrients (PK) annually and to two that were deficient in nutrients: applications were made in two successive years, but to different areas within these original treatments. Maximum yields in 1986 (7.1 t grain ha^-1) were a little greater than in 1987. In 1987, microplots on the FYM and PK treatments gave similar yields, provided enough fertilizer N was applied, but in 1986 yields on the PK treatment were always less than those on the FYM treatment, no matter how much fertilizer N was applied. In plots with adequate crop nutrients, about 51% of the labelled N was present in above-ground crop and weed at harvest, about 30% remained in the top 70 cm of soil (mostly in the 0–23 cm layer) and about 19% was unaccounted for, all irrespective of the rate of N application and of the quantity of inorganic N in the soil at the time of application. Less than 4% of the added fertilizer N was present in inorganic form in the soil at harvest, confirming results from comparable experiments with autumn-sown cereals in south-east England. Thus, in this experiment there is no evidence that a spring-sown cereal is more likely to leave unused fertilizer in the soil than an autumn-sown one. With trace applications (ca. 2 kg N ha^-1) more labelled N was retained in the soil and less was in the above-ground crop. Where P and K were deficient, yields were depressed, a smaller proportion of the labelled fertilizer N was present in the above-ground crop at harvest and more remained in the soil.Although the percentage uptake of labelled N was similar across the range of fertilizer N applications, the uptake of total N fell off at the higher N rates, particularly on the FYM treatment. This was reflected in the appearance of a negative Added Nitrogen Interaction (ANI) at the highest rate of application. Fertilizer N blocked the uptake of soil N, particularly from below 23 cm, once the capacity of the crop to take up N was exceeded. Denitrification and leaching were almost certainly insufficient to account for the 19% loss of spring-added N across the whole range of N applications and other loss processes must also have contributed.     

Effects of gypsum on the uptake,assimilation and cycling of 15N-labelled ammonium and nitrate-N by perennial ryegrass

Solution culture studies have shown that plant uptake of NH₄ ⁺ and NO₃ ^- can be improved by increasing the concentration of Ca²⁺ in the root environment: the same may be true for grass grown in soil culture. An experiment was set up to see whether gypsum (CaSO₄ 2H₂O) increased the rate at which perennial ryegrass absorbed ¹⁵NH₄ ⁺ and ¹⁵NO₃ ^- from soil.The results demonstrated that gypsum increases the rates of uptake of both NH₄ ⁺ and NO₃ ^- by perennial ryegrass. However because there was little potential for mineral-N loss from the experimental system, either by gaseous emission or by N immobilization, long term improvements in fertilizer efficiency were not observed. Nitrogen cycling from shoots to roots commenced once net uptake of N into plants had ceased. Labelled N transferred thus to roots underwent isotopic exchange with unlabelled soil N. It was suggested that this exchange of N might constitute an energy drain from the plant, if plant organic N was exchanged for soil inorganic N. The fact that the exchange occurred at all cast doubt on the suitability of the ¹⁵N-isotope dilution technique for assessing fertilizer efficiency in medium to long term experiments. There was evidence that the extra NO₃ ^--N taken up by plants on the all-nitrate treatments as a result of gypsum application, was reduced in root tissue rather than in shoots, but to the detriment of subsequent root growth and N uptake.