Mammographic microcalcifications: detection with xerography, screen- film, and digitized film display

Pulverized bone specks and aluminum oxide specks were measured by hand into sizes ranging from 0.2 mm to 1.0 mm and then arranged in clusters. These clusters were superimposed on a human breast tissue phantom, and xeromammograms and screen-film mammograms of the clusters were made. The screen-film mammograms were digitized using a high-resolution laser scanner and then displayed on cathode ray tube (CRT) monitors. Six radiologists independently counted the microcalcifications on the xeromammograms, the screen-film mammograms, and the digitized-film mammograms. The xeromammograms were examined with a magnifying glass; the screen-film images were examined with a magnifying glass and by hot light; and the digitized-film images were examined by electronic magnification and image processing. The bone speck size that corresponded to a mean 50% detectability level for each technique was as follows: xeromammography, 0.550 mm; digitized film, 0.573 mm; and screen-film, 0.661 mm. We postulate that electronic magnification and image processing with edge enhancement can improve the capability of screen-film mammography to enhance the detection of microcalcifications.     

Magnification mammography: a comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for the detection of simulated small masses and microcalcifications

The objective of this study was a comparison of a full-field digital mammography (FFDM) system and a conventional screen-film mammography (SFM) system with respect to the detectability of simulated small masses and microcalcifications in the magnification mode. All images were obtained using 1.8 times magnification. The FFDM images were obtained at radiation dose levels of 1.39, 1.0, 0.7, 0.49 and 0.24 times that of the SFM images. A contrast-detail phantom was used to compare the detection of simulated lesions using a four alternative forced-choice reader study with three readers. The correct observation ratio (COR) was calculated as the fraction of correctly identified lesions to the total number of simulated lesions. Soft-copy reading was performed for all digital images. Direct magnification images acquired with the digital system showed a lower object contrast threshold than those acquired with the conventional system. For equal radiation dose, the digital system provided a significantly increased COR (0.95) compared with the screen-film system (0.82). For simulated microcalcifications, the corresponding difference was 0.90 to 0.72. The digital system allowed equal detection to screen-film at 40% of the radiation dose used for screen film. Digital magnification images are superior to screen-film magnification images for the detection of simulated small masses and microcalcifications even at a lower radiation dose.     

Investigation of reduction of exposure dose in digital mammography: relationship between exposure dose and image processing

In digital mammograms, granularity is an important image property for the detection of microcalcifications and masses. Therefore, we investigated the relationship between the conditions of various exposure doses and the detectability of RMI156 phantom images with and without image processing for the reduction of exposure dose. The images are processed with Gaussian filter and unsharp-masking filters to evaluate the effects on image properties by using the digital Wiener spectrum (WS) presampled modulation transfer function (MTF). In addition, observer performance tests for the detectability of microcalcifications and masses are performed. With Gaussian filtering, the WS value decreased to 50% at 2.0 cycles/mm and the detectability score of masses increased 80% and 12%, on 1.34 mGy and 2.62 mGy, respectively (p<0.05). With unsharp-masking (7 x 7 pixels), the MTF value increased to 126% at 2.0 cycles/mm, and the detectability of microcalcification to 32% and 5%, on 1.34 mGy and 5.28 mGy, respectively (p<0.05) compared with the original image. The optimal dose of simulated lesions with unsharp masking became 5.25 mGy. The unsharp masking could reduce 37% of the exposure dose without a loss of detectability of microcalcifications and masses.     

Film-screen magnification versus electronic magnification and enhancement of digitized contact mammograms in the assessment of subtle microcalcifications.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To compare information drawn from magnification mammography with that extracted from electronic magnification, processing, and display of the digitized contact images. METHODS: Contact and magnification images of a mammographic statistical phantom were obtained. The magnification films versus the computer-enhanced, digitized images of the corresponding contact mammograms were separately presented to three observers. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to compare lesion detectability. The contact and magnification mammograms of 86 patients with subtle microcalcifications were also studied. The breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) scheme was used to compare the magnification patient films versus the corresponding digitized contact images. Differences in mammographic assessment were evaluated by using the kappa statistic. The dose to breast tissue from contact and magnification mammography was measured to evaluate dose reduction in instances where magnification mammography was to be avoided. RESULTS: Lesion detectability was found to be similar when either the digitized film image or the magnification hard-copy film was inspected. Interpretation of patient images by inspection of the contact and magnification screen-film mammograms on a view-box was in excellent agreement with that yielded by inspection of the contact image on a view-box and the computer-enhanced, digitized contact image on a display monitor. CONCLUSIONS: Electronic magnification and processing of the digitized contact image may provide valuable information concerning subtle microcalcifications, rendering magnification mammography unnecessary for many patients with such lesions.     

Screen film vs full-field digital mammography: image quality,detectability and characterization of lesions

The objective of this study was to compare screen-film mammography (SFM) to full-field digital mammography (FFDM) regarding image quality as well as detectability and characterization of lesions using equivalent images of the same patient acquired with both systems. Two mammography units were used, one with a screen-film system (Senographe DMR) and the other with a digital detector (Senographe 2000D, both GEMS). Screen-film and digital mammograms were performed on 55 patients with cytologically or histologically proven tumors on the same day. Together with these, 75 digital mammograms of patients without tumor and the corresponding previous screen-film mammograms not older than 1.5 years were reviewed by three observers in a random order. Contrast, exposure, and the presence of artifacts were evaluated. Different details, such as the skin, the retromamillary region, and the parenchymal structures, were judged according to a three-point ranking scale. Finally, the detectability of microcalcifications and lesions were compared and correlated to histology. Image contrast was judged to be good in 76%, satisfactory in 20%, and unsatisfactory in 4% of screen-film mammograms. Digital mammograms were judged to be good in 99% and unsatisfactory in 1% of cases. Improper exposure of screen-film system occurred in 18% (10% overexposed and 8% underexposed). Digital mammograms were improperly exposed in 4% of all cases but were of acceptable quality after post-processing. Artifacts, most of them of no significance, were found in 78% of screen-film and in none of the digital mammograms. Different anatomical regions, such as the skin, the retromamillary region, and dense parenchymal areas, were better visualized in digital than in screen-film mammography. All malignant tumors were seen by the three radiologists; however, digital mammograms allowed a better characterization of these lesions to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS;) [corrected] categories (FFDM better than SFM in 23 of 165 vs 9 of 165 judged cases in SFM). In conclusion, digital mammography offers a consistent, high image quality in combination with a better contrast and without artifacts. Lesion detection in digital images was equal to that in screen-film images; however, categorization of the lesions to the BI-RADS classification was slightly better.     

Radiologists' preferences for digital mammographic display. The International Digital Mammography Development Group

PURPOSE: To determine the preferences of radiologists among eight different image processing algorithms applied to digital mammograms obtained for screening and diagnostic imaging tasks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight images representing histologically proved masses or calcifications were obtained by using three clinically available digital mammographic units. Images were processed and printed on film by using manual intensity windowing, histogram-based intensity windowing, mixture model intensity windowing, peripheral equalization, multiscale image contrast amplification (MUSICA), contrast-limited adaptive histogram equalization, Trex processing, and unsharp masking. Twelve radiologists compared the processed digital images with screen-film mammograms obtained in the same patient for breast cancer screening and breast lesion diagnosis. RESULTS: For the screening task, screen-film mammograms were preferred to all digital presentations, but the acceptability of images processed with Trex and MUSICA algorithms were not significantly different. All printed digital images were preferred to screen-film radiographs in the diagnosis of masses; mammograms processed with unsharp masking were significantly preferred. For the diagnosis of calcifications, no processed digital mammogram was preferred to screen-film mammograms. CONCLUSION: When digital mammograms were preferred to screen-film mammograms, radiologists selected different digital processing algorithms for each of three mammographic reading tasks and for different lesion types. Soft-copy display will eventually allow radiologists to select among these options more easily.     

Dose reduction in full-field digital mammography: an anthropomorphic breast phantom study

The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential for radiation dose reduction by using other beam qualities in full-field digital mammography (FFDM) compared with screen-film mammography (SFM). FFDM was performed using an amorphous silicon detector with a caesium iodide scintillator layer (Senographe 2000D, GE, Milwaukee, USA). SFM was performed using a state-of-the-art conventional system (Senographe DMR, GE, Milwaukee, USA) with a dedicated screen-film combination. An anthropomorphic breast phantom with superimposed microcalcifications (50-200 microm) was used to evaluate the detectability of microcalcifications. Contact mammograms and magnification views (m=1.8) performed with both the digital and the screen-film system were compared. Images were exposed automatically. Molybdenum/Molybdenum (Mo/Mo) anode-filter combination, 28 kVp and 63 mAs were selected by the automatic optimization of parameters (AOP) of the conventional system. This exposure protocol (protocol A) was also used as baseline for the digital system. Dose reduction in digital mammography was achieved by using protocol B with Mo/Rh and 31 kVp and protocol C with Rh/Rh and 32 kVp. The detectability of microcalcifications was assessed by 3 experienced readers with a confidence level ranging from 1 to 5. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed. In protocol A the area under the ROC-curve (A(z)) for contact views performed by the screen-film system was 0.64 and for those performed with the FFDM system 0.68. The A(z) values were 0.74 in protocol B and 0.65 in protocol C for the digital system. For the conventional and digital magnification views A(z) values were 0.71 and 0.79, respectively. For protocol B the A(z) value was 0.81 and for protocol C it was 0.76. There is no statistically significant difference in the A(z) values for the different protocols in digital mammography and no significant difference from the screen-film system. A potential for dose reduction by using other beam qualities seems to be possible with this digital system.     

A comparison of digitized storage phosphors and conventional mammography in the detection of malignant microcalcifications

The detectability of malignant tumor-derived microcalcifications with conventional mammography was compared to that with digital images (2000 X 2510 pixels by 10 bits) derived from a storage phosphor-based digital radiography system capable of 5 line pair/mm resolution at identical exposure factors (30 kVp, 250 mAs, 65 cm film-focus distance). Microcalcifications (50-800 microns in diameter) were randomly superimposed on a preserved human breast specimen. ROC analysis based on 480 observations made by four readers indicated that the ability to detect the calcifications with digital images (ROC area = 0.871 +/- 0.066) was equivalent to conventional mammography (ROC area = 0.866 +/- 0.075) despite lower spatial resolution. With digital mammography, 62% of all clusters were correctly localized, but only 23.6% of the individual calcifications were counted. With conventional mammography 61% of all clusters were correctly localized, but significantly more of the individual calcifications (31.5%) were counted.     

Detecting clustered microcalcifications in the female breast: secondary digitized images versus mammograms.

We compared the detection of clustered microcalcifications by means of conventional mammograms and by means of secondary digitized images with a spatial resolution of 2048 x 1684 pixels and a contrast resolution of 12 bit. A Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) study was carried out using a cadaver breast showing phantom microcalcifications. A set of 100 mammograms was evaluated by two experienced senior radiologists. The ROC scores obtained with the digital images were 10% lower than those obtained with the conventional images. This difference however does not reach statistical significance. The use of a digital zoom function based on pixel duplication is also investigated. This zoom function does not produce a change in the diagnostic accuracy of the digital method. Attention is also paid to the advantages and disadvantages encountered by the radiologists when working on the digital viewing system. The most important drawback seems to be that it is considerably more time consuming than the conventional procedure, and this is especially due to the long loading time of the images and to the absence of window and level preselections.     

Storage phosphor and film-screen mammography: performance with different mammographic techniques

The aim of this study was to compare the image quality of storage phosphor plates with that in screen-film radiograms in mammography. Two anode/filter combinations were also compared – Mo/Mo and W/Rh. S Storage phosphor plates, generation IIIN (Fuji, Tokyo, Japan) and a conventional screen-film system (Kodak, Rochester, N. Y.) were evaluated using two mammographic units. One unit had a 0.6-mm focal spot, an anode/filter combination of Mo/Mo and no grid (A_Mo); the other had a 0.3-mm focal spot, a grid, and two possible combinations of anode/filter Mo/Mo (B_Mo) and W/Rh (B_W). Simulated tumours and microcalcifications were randomly positioned in an anthropomorphic breast phantom (RMI model 165, no. 210–009, Radiation Measurements Inc., Middleton, Wisconsin). The image quality was evaluated using a modified version of receiver operating characteristics analysis. Five observers evaluated 300 films and 300 hard copy images each. Radiation doses were also determined. The image quality of the conventional screen-film images was significantly better than that for the storage phosphor plate mammograms. The B_Mo system rated best, for the detection of both tumours and microcalcifications, although it was not significantly different from the B_W system. Systems B_Mo and B_W rated significantly better than the A_Mo system for both image receptors studied. The mean absorbed dose was twice as high for the B_Mo system as for the A_Mo and B_W systems for both conventional and digital technique. The mammograms produced with the screen-film combination gave a significantly better detectability than the storage phosphor plates used in this study. Substantial dose reduction could be achieved using an anode/filter combination of W/Rh instead of Mo/Mo with no significant loss of information in the images. Received 6 June 1997; Revision received 22 August 1997; Accepted 10 July 1998     

Detection of simulated microcalcifications in fixed mammary tissue: An ROC study of the effect of local versus global histogram equalization

PURPOSE: To investigate whether sliding window adaptive histogram equalization (SWAHE) of digital mammograms improves the detection of simulated calcifications, as compared to images normalized by global histogram equalization (GHE). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Direct digital mammograms were obtained from mammary tissue phantoms superimposed with different frames. Each frame was divided into forty squares by a wire mesh, and contained granular calcifications randomly positioned in about 50% of the squares. Three radiologists read the mammograms on a display monitor. They classified their confidence in the presence of microcalcifications in each square on a scale of 1 to 5. Images processed with GHE were first read and used as a reference. In a later session, the same images processed with SWAHE were read. RESULTS: The results were compared using ROC methodology. When the total areas AZ were compared, the results were completely equivocal. When comparing the high-specificity partial ROC area AZ,0.2 below false-positive fraction (FPF) 0.20, two of the three observers performed best with the images processed with SWAHE. The difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: When the reader's confidence threshold in malignancy is set at a high level, increasing the contrast of mammograms with SWAHE may enhance the visibility of microcalcifications without adversely affecting the false-positive rate. When the reader's confidence threshold is set at a low level, the effect of SWAHE is an increase of false positives. Further investigation is needed to confirm the validity of the conclusions.     

The effects of gray scale image processing on digital mammography interpretation performance

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To determine the effects of three image-processing algorithms on diagnostic accuracy of digital mammography in comparison with conventional screen-film mammography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 201 cases consisting of nonprocessed soft copy versions of the digital mammograms acquired from GE, Fischer, and Trex digital mammography systems (1997-1999) and conventional screen-film mammograms of the same patients were interpreted by nine radiologists. The raw digital data were processed with each of three different image-processing algorithms creating three presentations-manufacturer's default (applied and laser printed to film by each of the manufacturers), MUSICA, and PLAHE-were presented in soft copy display. There were three radiologists per presentation. RESULTS: Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for GE digital mass cases was worse than screen-film for all digital presentations. The area under the receiver operating characteristic for Trex digital mass cases was better, but only with images processed with the manufacturer's default algorithm. Sensitivity for GE digital mass cases was worse than screen film for all digital presentations. Specificity for Fischer digital calcifications cases was worse than screen film for images processed in default and PLAHE algorithms. Specificity for Trex digital calcifications cases was worse than screen film for images processed with MUSICA. CONCLUSION: Specific image-processing algorithms may be necessary for optimal presentation for interpretation based on machine and lesion type.     

Wert und Bedeutung der digitalen Vollfeldmammographie im Rahmen eines Mammographie-Screenings

To evaluate the digital technique for screening mammography various experimental studies and clinical examinations were performed by using direct full-field digital mammography (FFDM). The findings concerning the detectability and characterization of microcalcifications and soft tissue masses as well as the radiation exposure were compared to the state-of-the-art conventional screen-film mammography (SFM). The results of these studies revealed a high performance of the digital images, which are at least equivalent to the conventional images, whereas digital spot views were significantly superior to conventional ones particularly in the detection of microcalcifications. This was especially true, when the potential of post-processing was used. In addition, the sensitivity of FFDM should be increased, if computer-aided-diagnosis (CAD) is available. Furthermore, the patient radiation dose can be significantly reduced. Additional advantages are quick and easy handling, efficient data transfer and digital archiving. Thus, FFDM will become an important tool in screening mammography.     

Effects of optimization and image processing in digital chest radiography: an ROC study with an anthropomorphic phantom.

A digital system for chest radiography based on a large image intensifier was compared to a conventional film-screen system. The digital system was optimized with regard to spatial and contrast resolution and dose. The images were digitally processed for contrast and edge enhancement. A simulated pneumothorax and two simulated nodules were positioned over the lungs and the mediastinum of an anthropomorphic phantom. Observer performance was evaluated with ROC analysis. Five observers assessed the processed digital images and the conventional full-size radiographs. The time spent viewing the full-size radiographs and the digital images was recorded. For the simulated pneumothorax, the results showed perfect performance for the full-size radiographs and detectability was high also for the processed digital images. No significant difference in the detectability of the simulated nodules was seen between the two imaging systems. The results for the digital images showed a significantly improved detectability for the nodules in the mediastinum as compared to a previous ROC study where no optimization and image processing was available. No significant difference in detectability was seen between the former and the present ROC study for small nodules in the lung. No difference was seen in the time spent assessing the conventional full-size radiographs and the digital images. The study indicates that processed digital images produced by a large image intensifier are equal in image quality to conventional full-size radiographs for low-contrast objects such as nodules.     

Computer-aided diagnosis in full digital mammography

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The authors clarify the detection rates for breast cancerous tumors and clustered microcalcifications with computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) based on Fuji Computed Radiography. The authors also determine whether mammographic reading with CAD contributes to the discovery of breast cancer. METHODS: Data acquired by Fuji Computed Radiography 9000, which consisted of 4148 digital mammograms including 267 cases of breast cancer, was transferred directly to an analysis workstation where an original software program determined extraction rates for breast tumors and clustered microcalcifications. Furthermore, using another 344 mammograms from 86 women, observer performance studies were conducted on five doctors for receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. RESULTS: Sensitivity to breast cancerous tumors and clustered microcalcifications were 89.9% and 92.8%, respectively false-positive rates were 1.35 and 0.40 per image, respectively. The observer performance studies indicate that an average Az value for the five doctors was greater with the CAD system than with a film-only reading without CAD, and that a reading with CAD was significantly superior at P < 0.022. CONCLUSIONS: It has been shown that CAD based on Fuji Computed Radiography offers good detection rates for both breast cancerous tumors and clustered microcalcifications, and that the reading of mammograms with this CAD system would provide potential improvement in diagnostic accuracy for breast cancer.     

A comparison of dual-energy digital radiography and screen-film imaging in the detection of subtle interstitial pulmonary disease

An ROC study is described which compares the performance of three types of images--conventional screen-film, single-energy digital and dual energy bone cancelled (soft tissue) digital--in detecting subtle interstitial pulmonary disease. Marginally detectable nodular and reticulonodular patterns (12 different patterns of each) were superimposed over the lungs of a frozen human chest phantom to simulate the clinical situation. The digital images were formatted on film at full size (ie, 35 cm X 43 cm). A total of 156 images (52 of each type, of which 28 were normal and 24 had simulated pathology) were used in the study and read by five experienced chest radiologists. Using a paired t-test, the areas under the individual ROC curves were compared for three combinations of images--single-energy digital and conventional, soft tissue digital and conventional, and soft tissue and single-energy digital. No statistically significant difference was observed between the conventional and single-energy digital images. The readers performed better with both conventional and single-energy digital images than with the soft tissue digital images at statistically significant levels (P = 0.05 for conventional vs. soft tissue digital and P = 0.02 for single-energy digital vs. soft tissue digital). The results suggest that there is no advantage in employing dual-energy soft tissue images to assist in diagnosing interstitial disease in the clinical setting. They also suggest that spatial resolution requirements are less demanding in digital chest systems that obtain scatter-free images than in digital systems utilizing conventional scatter control techniques.     

The effect of digital unsharp-mask filtering on the signal-to-noise ratio in computed radiography.

The effect of image processing in computed radiography (CR) has been analyzed in many ROC studies. The results have not shown great diagnostic improvements, except in some special occasions. The theoretical effect of image enhancement on the signal-to-noise ratio in CR images has so far not been assessed. Concerning the previous results, the changes induced in the signal-to-noise ratio by digital image processing are certainly of interest. We calculated the signal-to-noise ratio in various conditions according to the principles of the Rose model, using the computerized image data of storage phosphor radiography. Seventy-seven computed radiographs processed by Gaussian unsharp-mask filtering using different kernel widths were analyzed. The signal-to-noise ratio was reduced in all images by more than 40% when the smallest kernels were used, and increased slowly towards the original value with greater kernel sizes. In no conditions did the ratio exceed the original one. The results show that although edges and signal contrast can be enhanced by unsharp-mask filtering, this happens at the cost of increased noise. This might at least in part explain why image processing does not significantly improve the diagnostic information content of a computed radiograph.     

Evaluation of computer-aided detection of lesions in mammograms obtained with a digital phase-contrast mammography system

A computer-aided detection (CAD) system was evaluated for its ability to detect microcalcifications and masses on images obtained with a digital phase-contrast mammography (PCM) system, a system characterised by the sharp images provided by phase contrast and by the high resolution of 25-μm-pixel mammograms. Fifty abnormal and 50 normal mammograms were collected from about 3,500 mammograms and printed on film for reading on a light box. Seven qualified radiologists participated in an observer study based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The average of the areas under ROC curve (AUC) values for the ROC analysis with and without CAD were 0.927 and 0.897 respectively (P?=?0.015). The AUC values improved from 0.840 to 0.888 for microcalcifications (P?=?0.034) and from 0.947 to 0.962 for masses (P?=?0.025) respectively. The application of CAD to the PCM system is a promising approach for the detection of breast cancer in its early stages.     

Detection of pneumothorax: comparison of digital and conventional chest imaging

To investigate radiologists' performance at interpreting digital radiographic images, we compared the detectability of pneumothoraces on computed radiographic chest images with 0.2-mm pixel size (2.5 Ip/mm) with their detectability on matched conventional screen-film images (5 Ip/mm). Eight radiologists reviewed 50 computed and 50 screen-film chest radiographs from 25 patients with pneumothoraces and 25 patients with other (or no) abnormalities. Four of the readers who best detected pneumothoraces on screen-film examinations performed worse when interpreting computed radiographic studies; the other four readers detected pneumothoraces similarly with both techniques. No relationship was found between the size of a pneumothorax and its likelihood of detection by either technique. These results raise concerns about implementing computed radiography for comprehensive chest imaging.     

Storage phosphor versus screen-film radiography: effect of varying exposure parameters and unsharp mask filtering on the detectability of cortical bone defects

Diagnostic performance with storage phosphor radiography is influenced by exposure parameters and digital filtering algorithms. The authors compared the detectability of cortical lesions in excised human femoral shafts on state-of-the-art screen-film radiographs and storage phosphor digital radiographs. For the digital system, the effect of varying exposure parameters (photon flux and tube voltage) and unsharp mask filtering (kernel size and enhancement factor) was tested. Analysis of receiver operating characteristics was performed for 10,560 observations made by eight radiologists. Under identical exposure conditions, storage phosphor imaging yielded no significant advantages over conventional screen-film radiography. Although large variations in exposure dose are possible with storage phosphors, the potential for dose reduction was limited even by means of an increase in tube voltage. The performance with unsharp masked images declined with decreasing kernel size and pronounced enhancement.