The comparison of patients with hospitalized health-care-associated pneumonia to community-acquired pneumonia

Health-care-associated pneumonia (HCAP) is defined as pneumonia that develops in patients with a history of recent hospitalization, hemodialysis as an outpatient, residence in a nursing home, outpatient intravenous therapy and home wound care. We aimed to compare the initial demographic characteristics, causative agents and prognosis between hospitalized HCAP and community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) patients. HCAP and CAP patients hospitalized between 01 September 2008-01 September 2009 were evaluated retrospectively. Out of 187 patients (131 males, mean age 66.3 ± 14.3 years) who were hospitalized during one-year period, 98 were diagnosed as HCAP and 89 as CAP. Among HCAP patients, 64 (65.3%) had a history of hospitalization in the last 90 days, 26 (26.5%) received outpatient intravenous therapy, 17 (17.3%) had home wound care, 6 (6.1%) were on hemodialysis program in the last 30 days and 4 (4.1%) lived in a nursing home. The causative pathogen was detected in 39 (39.8%) HCAP and 8 (9.0%) CAP patients. The most frequently isolated microorganisms were Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acinetobacter baumannii in HCAP, and Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae in CAP patients. Inappropriate empiric antibiotic treatment was documented in 8 (25.8%) of 39 HCAP patients, in whom a causative agent was isolated whereas the antibiotic treatment was appropriate in all CAP patients. The duration of hospitalization (14.4 ± 11.4 vs. 10.7 ± 7.9 days, p= 0.011) and mortality rate (34.7% vs. 9.0%, p< 0.001) were higher in HCAP compared with CAP patients. As HCAP is different than CAP in terms of patients' characteristics, causative microorganisms and prognosis, it should be considered in all patients hospitalized as CAP. Potentially drug-resistant microorganisms should be taken into consideration in the empirical antibiotic treatment of these patients.     

Clinical impact of broad-spectrum empirical antibiotic therapy in patients with healthcare-associated pneumonia: a multicenter interventional study

Healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP) has been proposed as a new category of pneumonia distinct from community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). A multicenter observational study in 2008 finds that patients with HCAP have a mortality rate significantly higher than patients with CAP, and a worse outcome is associated at logistic regression analysis with a low adherence to empirical antibiotic therapy recommended by ATS/IDSA guidelines. We designed a prospective interventional study to establish whether administration of a broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy consistent with the 2005 ATS/IDSA guidelines has an effect on the clinical outcome of hospitalized patients with HCAP. All patients with HCAP prospectively admitted in 25 medical wards of 20 Italian hospitals during a 1-month period were included in the study. All patients were assigned to receive an empirical therapy including a fluoroquinolone plus an anti-MRSA agent plus either piperacillin?Ctazobactam or a carbapenem. Main measures for improvement were duration of antibiotic therapy, length of hospital stay, and in-hospital mortality rate. Patients were compared with a historical control group of 90 patients, and followed up to discharge or death. HCAP patients receiving a guideline-concordant therapy had a shorter duration of antibiotic therapy (median 15 vs. 12?days, p?=?0.0002), a shorter duration of hospitalization (median 18 vs. 14?days, p?=?0.02), and a lower mortality rate (17.8 vs. 7.1?%, p?=?0.03). Our results suggest that an empirical broad-spectrum therapy is associated with improved outcome in patients with HCAP.     

Health care‐associated pneumonia in haemodialysis patients: Clinical outcomes in patients treated with narrow versus broad spectrum antibiotic therapy

Background and objective: Although the 2005 American Thoracic Society/Infectious Disease Society of America antibiotic guidelines classify pneumonia occurring in patients receiving chronic haemodialysis as health care‐associated pneumonia (HCAP), and thus recommend treatment with broad‐spectrum antibiotics for these patients, little data support this classification. We compared clinical outcomes in haemodialysis patients hospitalized with pneumonia, who were treated with broad‐spectrum antibiotics versus narrow‐spectrum antibiotics. Methods: One hundred twenty‐five haemodialysis patients with pneumonia met eligibility criteria. Categorization into the community‐acquired pneumonia (CAP) group or HCAP group was based on antibiotic therapy patients received. Time to oral therapy, time to clinical stability, length of stay and mortality were compared. Results: CAP and HCAP patients did not differ in Pneumonia Severity Index and Charlson Comorbidity index scores, but HCAP patients were more likely to meet criteria for severe pneumonia. Patients treated with HCAP therapy had a significantly longer time to oral therapy than CAP patients (9.2 vs 3.2 days, P < 0.001) and a significantly longer length of stay (11.9 vs 5.1 days, P < 0.001). Time to clinical stability was marginally longer in the HCAP group (3.1 vs 2.4 days, P = 0.07). Patients treated with HCAP therapy had longer continuation of intravenous antibiotics after reaching clinical stability (5.5 vs 0.78 days, P < 0.001). Conclusions: This study is the first to our knowledge to describe clinical outcomes in patients with haemodialysis as their only HCAP risk factor. Narrow‐spectrum antibiotics may be safe in haemodialysis patients with no other HCAP risk factors. HCAP therapy delayed de‐escalation to oral antibiotics was associated with increased duration of intravenous antibiotics and length of stay.     

不同类型老年吸入性肺炎的病原学、抗生素应用及临床转归

目的 比较老年社区获得性吸入性肺炎(CAP)、医疗相关性吸入性肺炎(HCAP)及医院获得性吸入性肺炎(HAP,包括呼吸机相关性吸入性肺炎)三者病原学、抗生素应用及治疗转归的关系.方法 收集2005年1月一2010年12月北京二炮总医院呼吸科住院的216例老年吸人性肺炎患者病例,分析其病原学结果、抗生素应用的及治疗转归.结果 三种吸入性肺炎的病原学有显著差异,与CAP和HCAP相比,HAP患者G-杆菌的感染比例明显增多(P<0.001);抗生素应用方案有明显差异,CAP组病人未调整抗生素应用比率明显高于HCAP组与HAP组(P<0.001);抗生素应用策略不同,所致死亡率有明显差异,以升阶梯方案为最高,以降阶梯治疗为最低(P=0.03).结论 三种吸入性肺炎在感染病原菌种类、抗生素应用策略及治疗转归上有明显差异,应根据不同类型的老年吸入性肺炎特点合理经验性使用抗菌药物.     

Comparison of clinical characteristics between healthcare-associated pneumonia and community-acquired pneumonia in patients admitted to secondary hospitals

BackgroundSince healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP) is heterogeneous, clinical characteristics and outcomes are different from region to region. There can also be differences between HCAP patients hospitalized in secondary or tertiary hospitals. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics of HCAP patients admitted into secondary community hospitals.MethodsThis was a retrospective study conducted in patients with HCAP or community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) hospitalized in two secondary hospitals between March 2009 and January 2011.ResultsOf a total of 303 patients, 96 (31.7%) had HCAP. 42 patients (43.7%) resided in a nursing home or long-term care facility, 36 (37.5%) were hospitalized in an acute care hospital for ≥ 2 days within 90 days, ten received outpatient intravenous therapy, and eight attended a hospital clinic or dialysis center. HCAP patients were older. The rates of patients with CURB-65 scores of 3 or more (22.9% vs. 9.1%; p = 0.001) and PSI class IV or more (82.2% vs. 34.7%; p < 0.001) were higher in the HCAP group. Drug-resistant pathogens were more frequently detected in the HCAP group (23.9% vs. 0.4%; p < 0.001). However, Streptococcus pneumoniae was the most common pathogen in both groups. The rates of antibiotic change, use of inappropriate antibiotics, and failure of initial antibiotic therapy in the HCAP group were significantly higher. Although the overall survival rate of the HCAP group was significantly lower (82.3% vs. 96.8%; p < 0.001), multivariate analyses failed to show that HCAP itself was a prognostic factor for mortality (p = 0.826). Only PSI class IV or more was associated with increased mortality (p = 0.005).ConclusionsHCAP should be distinguished from CAP because of the different clinical features. However, the current definition of HCAP does not appear to be a prognostic for death. In addition, the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics for HCAP should be reassessed because S. pneumoniae was most frequently identified even in HCAP patients.     

Health care-associated pneumonia (HCAP): empiric antibiotics targeting methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa predict optimal outcome

Inappropriate initial antimicrobial therapy (IIAT) has been associated with decreased survival in patients with health care-associated pneumonia (HCAP). We performed a study to determine whether empiric HCAP antibiotic regimens targeting methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are associated with greater appropriate therapy. A retrospective cohort study of culture-positive HCAP over 6 years (January 2003-December 2008) was performed at Barnes-Jewish Hospital, a 1200-bed urban teaching hospital. We identified 757 consecutive patients with HCAP. IIAT was administered to 213 (28%) patients. The pathogens most frequently associated with IIAT included P. aeruginosa (n=60, 28%), MRSA (n=58, 27%), and Acinetobacter species (n=32, 15%).Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that empiric anti-pseudomonal antibiotics (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.34-2.29; p=0.036), empiric anti-MRSA antibiotics (AOR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.36-2.14; p=0.018), infection with Streptococcus pneumoniae (AOR, 2.82; 95% CI, 2.03-3.91; p=0.002), absence of Acinetobacter species infection (AOR, 10.57; 95% CI, 7.29-15.33; p<0.001), absence of P. aeruginosa infection (AOR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.36-2.05; p=0.014), and absence of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection (AOR, 20.43; 95% CI, 9.35-44.66; p<0.001) are independent predictors of appropriate therapy for HCAP. Our study suggests that initial therapy for HCAP should include antibiotics targeting MRSA and P. aeruginosa in order to provide appropriate initial therapy. However, the selection of individual antibiotic agents should be based on local patterns of infection and adjusted when microbiology results become available.     

Effect of Antibiotic Guidelines on Outcomes of Hospitalized Patients with Nursing Home–Acquired Pneumonia

OBJECTIVES: To compare the 2003 community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) guideline and the 2005 healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP) guideline on time to clinical stability, length of hospital stay, and mortality in nursing home patients hospitalized for pneumonia.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: Three tertiary-care hospitals.
PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred thirty-four nursing home patients.
MEASUREMENTS: Patients were classified according to the antibiotic regimens they received based on the 2003 CAP guideline or the 2005 HCAP guideline. Time to clinical stability, time to switch therapy, and mortality were evaluated in an intention-to-treat analysis. A multivariate survival model using propensity analysis was used to adjust for heterogeneity between the two groups.
RESULTS: Of the 334 patients, 258 (77%) were treated according to the 2003 HCAP guideline. Time to clinical stability did not differ between those treated according to the 2003 CAP or the 2005 HCAP guidelines. Only the Pneumonia Severity Index ( P =.006) and multilobar involvement ( P =.005) were significantly associated with delay in achieving clinical stability. Adjusted in-hospital and 30-day mortality were comparable in both cohorts (odds ratio (OR)=0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.49–1.34, and OR=0.79, 95% CI=0.42–1.31, respectively), although time to switch therapy and length of stay were longer for those treated according to the 2005 HCAP guideline.
CONCLUSION: In hospitalized nursing home patients with pneumonia, treatment with an antibiotic regimen according to the 2003 CAP guideline achieved comparable time to clinical stability and in-hospital and 30-day mortality with a regimen based on the 2005 HCAP guideline.     

Health care-associated Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia

INTRODUCTION: While Staphylococcus aureus is an uncommon but serious cause of traditional community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), it is a predominant cause of nosocomial pneumonia in addition to the unique clinical entity of health care-associated pneumonia (HCAP). A cohort of bacteremic S aureus pneumonia cases was reviewed to determine the role of HCAP among the cohort, and to assess for differences between CAP and HCAP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Bacteremic S aureus pneumonia cases were identified from a prospective study of all patients diagnosed with CAP who presented to hospitals in Edmonton, Alberta, between November 2000 and November 2002. These cases were subsequently reviewed retrospectively. Demographic, clinical and microbiological data were obtained, and patients were classified as having CAP or HCAP. Relatedness of isolates was determined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis in conjunction with epidemiological information. RESULTS: There were 28 cases of bacteremic S aureus pneumonia identified. Fifty-seven per cent were reclassified as having HCAP, and 43% remained classified as having CAP. The CAP cohort was significantly younger than the HCAP cohort (mean age 49.0+/-23.7 years versus 67.8+/-18.6 years; P=0.035) with higher rates of intravenous drug use (50% versus 0%; P=0.002). Long-term care facility residence (44%) was common in the HCAP cohort. The HCAP cohort presented with more severe illness, having a higher mean pneumonia severity index score (143.1+/-41.1 versus 98.2+/-54.6; P=0.028), and despite fewer embolic complications, there was a trend toward a significantly higher mortality rate (31% versus 0%; P=0.052). Two community-acquired isolates cultured in the setting of intravenous drug use were methicillin-resistant, and no isolates were positive for Panton-Valentine leukocidin. There was evidence of relatedness involving 44% of the HCAP isolates by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis. CONCLUSION: HCAP accounts for a significant number of cases that, when using traditional definitions, would be classified as CAP. Severity of illness and mortality was excessive within the HCAP group. There was evidence of relatedness and spread of common strains in the HCAP cohort. The present study supports recommendations for treatment guidelines directed toward the entity of HCAP and the empirical coverage of S aureus among certain high-risk groups.     

Moxifloxacin versus Standard Therapy in Patients with Pneumonia Hospitalized after Failure of Preclinical Anti-infective Treatment

Abstract The failure rate of primary empirical anti-infective treatment of community-acquired pneumonia is reported to range between 2 and 7%. These patients are subject to a greater risk of intensive medical treatment and a higher mortality rate than patients who respond to primary treatment. We investigated 63 patients in a “real life scenario” who were admitted to the hospital after failure of primary outpatient therapy for community-acquired pneumonia. Thirty-three patients received intravenous standard therapy (betalactam 14, macrolide 3, levofloxacin 6, doxycycline 1, combinations 9 patients) while 30 patients were treated with intravenous moxifloxacin. The oral antibiotic pretreatment that failed most frequently was clarithromycin (n = 25), followed by amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (n = 16), cefixime (n = 10), cefuroxime/axetil (n = 5), doxycycline (3), cefpodoxime, and ciprofloxacin (2 each). There were no differences between the two groups in respect of age, gender, numbers of patients in nursing homes, numbers of patients with different underlying diseases (chronic bronchitis, coronary heart disease, diabetes mellitus, smoking, etc.), severity of pneumonia at the time of admission, numbers of patients requiring intensive care, and lethality. The group that underwent standard therapy experienced failure of the empirical intra-hospital antibiotic therapy more often during therapy [10 (30%) patients vs 2 (6%) in the moxifloxacin group, p = 0.009] and clinical failure of treatment on day 28 after initiation of therapy [7 (21%) patients vs 2 (6%) in the moxifloxacin group, p = 0.003]. In cases of failure of empirical preclinical antibiotic treatment for community-acquired pneumonia, subsequent intrahospital treatment with moxifloxacin is more successful than standard therapy in our study reflecting a "real life scenario".     

Usefulness of sputum Gram staining in community-acquired pneumonia]

To evaluate the usefulness of sputum gram staining in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), we reviewed 144 cases requiring hospitalization in the last 4 years. The sensitivity was 75.5%, specificity 68.2%, positive predictive value 74.1%, negative predictive value 69.8%, positive likelihood ratio 2.37, negative likelihood ratio 0.36 and accuracy 72.2% in 97 cases. Both sputum gram staining and culture were performed. Concerning bacterial pneumonia (65 cases), we compared the Gram staining group (n = 33), which received initial antibiotic treatment, based on sputum gram staining with the Empiric group (n = 32) that received antibiotics empirically. The success rates of the initial antibiotic treatment were 87.9% vs. 78.1% (P = 0.473); mean hospitalization periods were 9.67 vs. 11.75 days (P = 0.053); and periods of intravenous therapy were 6.73 vs. 7.91 days (P = 0.044), respectively. As for initial treatment, penicillins were used in the Gram staining group more frequently (P < 0.01). We conclude that sputum gram staining is useful for the shortening of the treatment period and the appropriate selection of initial antibiotics in bacterial pneumonia. We believe, therefore, that sputum gram staining is indispensable as a diagnostic tool CAP.     

医疗机构相关性肺炎和社区获得性肺炎的病原学、治疗及转归比较

目的 比较医疗机构相关性肺炎与社区获得性肺炎二者病原学特点、治疗及转归的差异.方法 收集2007年1月至2009年12月我院呼吸科住院的264例肺炎患者病例,分析比较医疗机构相关性肺炎与社区获得性肺炎的病原学特点、治疗及转归.结果 264例肺炎患者中,医疗机构相关性肺炎101例(38.26％)、社区获得性肺炎163例(...     

急诊高龄卫生保健相关性肺炎患者的临床特点分析

目的 :探讨急诊高龄卫生保健相关性肺炎(HCAP)患者的临床特征及预后。方法 :对2012年1月至2013年12月急诊病房收治的年龄>80岁的高龄肺部感染患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析,比较社区获得性肺炎(CAP)组与HCAP组患者的临床特征、病原学特点及预后。结果:165例高龄肺部感染患者中,HCAP组患者的平均住院天数[(19.9±12.3)d]显著长于CAP组[(14.6±7.4)d](P<0.05),且病死率显著高于后者(22.9%比7.3%,P<0.05)。2组患者症状不典型,有基础疾病者142例(86.1%)。2组患者均存在营养不良。HCAP组患者入院时的肺炎严重度指数(PSI)显著高于CAP组(125.2±27.1比116.8±25.8,P<0.05),PSI评分Ⅴ级的比例也显著高于后者(38.6%比23.2%,P     

Performance of PSI, CURB-65, and SCAP scores in predicting the outcome of patients with community-acquired and healthcare-associated pneumonia

The objective was to compare three score systems, pneumonia severity index (PSI), the Confusion-Urea-Respiratory Rate-Blood pressure-65 (CURB-65), and severe community-acquired pneumonia (SCAP), for prediction of the outcomes in a cohort of patients with community-acquired (CAP) and healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP). Large multi-center, prospective, observational study was conducted in 55 hospitals. HCAP patients were included in the high classes of CURB-65, PSI and SCAP scores have a mortality rate higher than that of CAP patients. HCAP patients included in the low class of the three severity rules have a significantly higher incidence of adverse events, including development of septic shock, transfer into an ICU, and death (p < 0.01). At multivariate Cox regression analysis, inclusion in the severe classes of PSI, CURB-65, or SCAP scores and receipt of an empirical therapy not adherent to international guidelines prove to be risk factors independently associated with poor outcome. PSI, CURB-65, and SCAP score have a good performance in patients with CAP but are less useful in patients with HCAP, especially in patients classified in the low-risk classes.     

Risk factors and outcome of community-acquired pneumonia due to Gram-negative bacilli

Background and objective:   Several sets of guidelines have advocated initial antibiotic treatment for community-acquired pneumonia due to Gram-negative bacilli in patients with specific risk factors. However, evidence to support this recommendation is scarce. We sought to identify risk factors for community-acquired pneumonia due to Gram-negative bacilli, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa , and to assess outcomes.
Methods:   An observational analysis was carried out on prospectively collected data for immunocompetent adults hospitalized for community-acquired pneumonia in two acute-care hospitals. Cases of pneumonia due to Gram-negative bacilli were compared with those of non-Gram-negative bacilli causes.
Results:   Sixty-one (2%) of 3272 episodes of community-acquired pneumonia were due to Gram-negative bacilli. COPD (odds ratio (OR) 2.4, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.2–5.1), current use of corticosteroids (OR 2.8, 95% CI: 1.2–6.3), prior antibiotic therapy (OR 2.6, 95% CI: 1.4–4.8), tachypnoea ≥30 cycles/min (OR 2.1, 95% CI: 1.1–4.2) and septic shock at presentation (OR 6.1, 95% CI: 2.5–14.6) were independently associated with Gram-negative bacilli pneumonia. Initial antibiotic therapy in patients with pneumonia due to Gram-negative bacilli was often inappropriate. These patients were also more likely to require admission to the intensive care unit, had longer hospital stays, and higher early (<48 h) (21% vs 2%; P  < 0.001) and overall mortality (36% vs 7%; P  < 0.001).
Conclusions:   These results suggest that community-acquired pneumonia due to Gram-negative bacilli is uncommon, but is associated with a poor outcome. The risk factors identified in this study should be considered when selecting initial antibiotic therapy for patients with community-acquired pneumonia.     

Evaluating the best empirical antibiotic therapy in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis

Background/aimsSpontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a life-threatening complication of advanced cirrhosis. By studying the susceptibility of isolated organisms and analyzing empirical antibiotic therapy combined with clinical outcomes, we aimed to find an improved empirical antibiotic therapy by considering the individual acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) grade for patients with or without sepsis.MethodsClinical outcomes of 182 patients were assessed retrospectively with multivariable regression analysis. Each of the 223 isolates was individually evaluated regarding susceptibility results and intrinsic resistances.ResultsPiperacillin/tazobactam had the highest antimicrobial susceptibility among monotherapies/fixed combinations, which was significantly lower than combination therapies such as meropenem-linezolid (75.3% vs. 98.5%, P < 0.001). The sensitivity of pathogens to empirical antibiotic therapy correlated with significantly lower inpatient mortality (18.9% vs. 37.0%, P = 0.018), shorter inpatient stay (16.3 ± 10.2 vs. 26.4 ± 21.0 days, P = 0.053) and shorter intensive care treatment (2.1 ± 4.5 vs. 7.9 ± 15.4 days, P = 0.016). The largest difference of mortality was observed in patients with ACLF grade 3 (54.5% vs. 73.1% [sensitive vs. non-sensitive]).ConclusionAll SBP patients benefited from efficient empirical antibiotic therapy, regarding the reduced inpatient mortality and complications. For SBP patients with ACLF grade 3 without sepsis, the combination therapy with meropenem-linezolid may be suitable considering the susceptibility results and the concentration in the peritoneal cavity.     

Prospective study of the usefulness of sputum Gram stain in the initial approach to community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization.

From February 1995 through May 1997, we prospectively studied 533 patients with community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization in order to assess the current usefulness of sputum Gram stain in guiding the etiologic diagnosis and initial antibiotic therapy when applied routinely. Sputum samples of good quality were obtained in 210 (39%) patients, 175 of whom showed a predominant morphotype. Sensitivity and specificity of Gram stain for the diagnosis of pneumococcal pneumonia were 57% and 97%, respectively; the corresponding values for Haemophilus influenzae pneumonia were 82% and 99%. Patients with a predominant morphotype were more frequently treated with monotherapy than were patients without a demonstrative sputum sample (89% vs. 75%; P<.001). Analysis of our data shows that a good-quality sputum sample can be obtained from a substantial number of patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Gram stain was highly specific for the diagnosis of pneumococcal and H. influenzae pneumonia and may be useful in guiding pathogen-oriented antimicrobial therapy.     

Comparison of Severe Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia with Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia

Background

We compared the demographic characteristics and outcomes of patients with severe healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP) to those with severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).

Methods

This was a retrospective study of prospectively collected data from all consecutive patients with severe pneumonia who were admitted to the hospital through the emergency department between January 2008 and December 2010.

Results

During the study period, 247 patients had severe pneumonia; of these, 107 had severe CAP and 140 had severe HCAP. There was no significant difference in demographic characteristics between the two groups, except for comorbidities. Although the incidence of potentially drug-resistant pathogens was higher in patients with severe HCAP than in those with severe CAP (34 vs. 6 %, P = 0.004), there was no statistically significant difference in the rate of inappropriate antibiotic treatment (16 vs. 3 %, P = 0.143). Finally, clinical outcomes, such as intensive care unit admission, length of hospital stay, and in-hospital mortality, were not different between the two groups. In a multiple logistic regression analysis, a higher PSI score (adjusted OR 1.01; 95 % CI 1.00–1.02; P = 0.024) and the need for mechanical ventilation (adjusted OR 2.62; 95 % CI 1.37–5.00; P = 0.004) were independently associated with in-hospital mortality. However, the type of pneumonia was not associated with in-hospital mortality after adjusting for potential confounding factors.

Conclusions

The severity of illness rather than the type of pneumonia might be associated with in-hospital mortality in patients with severe pneumonia.     

HIRA-TAN detects pathogens of pneumonia with a progressive course despite antibiotic treatment

BackgroundEmpiric antibiotics are administered for pneumonia when the causative pathogens are unidentified. Pathogen-directed therapy is impeded by negative culture results and/or culture time lag. This circumstance necessitates a salvage method for pathogen identification, especially when antibiotic therapy has failed. Here, we aimed to preliminarily investigate the HIRA-TAN method in pneumonia with a progressive course despite prior empiric antibiotic therapy.MethodsThis prospective study was conducted for patients who were referred to Dr. Zainoel Abidin Hospital, Aceh, Indonesia, from December 2016 to January 2017, owing to pneumonia with a progressive course. Sputum or pleural effusion was subjected to culture and the HIRA-TAN assay. The HIRA-TAN identified the candidate causative pathogens based on the difference in the cycle threshold (Ct) between the targeted pathogen and the single-copy human gene.ResultsPatients (n=27) were predominantly males (22 patients, 81.5%), with a median age of 62 years. All patients had comorbid disease and were classified as hospital-acquired pneumonia (25 patients, 92.6%) with multilobar infiltrates (22 patients, 81.5%). Bacterial culture identified causative pathogen(s) in some (14 patients, 51.8%), whereas the HIRA-TAN identified pathogen(s) in most (23 patients, 85.2%). The rapid pathogen identification by the HIRA-TAN will provide valuable information in guiding pathogen-directed therapy.ConclusionsThe result warrants a larger clinical trial to confirm the clinical efficacy of the HIRA-TAN in patients with progressive pneumonia despite previous antibiotic treatment.     

Clinical features of healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP) in a Japanese community hospital: comparisons among nursing home-acquired pneumonia (NHAP), HCAP other than NHAP, and community-acquired pneumonia

Background and objective: More than 100 000 Japanese die of pneumonia every year. The number of people residing in nursing homes is increasing with the ageing of the population. In 2005, the American Thoracic Society/Infectious Diseases Society of America (ATS/IDSA) published important guidelines for the management of healthcare‐associated pneumonia (HCAP). In Japan, however, the optimum strategy for management of HCAP is still unclear. The purpose of this study was to clarify the clinical features of patients with HCAP. Methods: Patients (n = 202) who were consecutively admitted with a diagnosis of acute pneumonia between October 2007 and September 2009 were retrospectively evaluated. Using the ATS/IDSA guidelines, patients were divided into three groups: a community‐acquired pneumonia (CAP) group (n = 123), a nursing home‐acquired pneumonia (NHAP) group (n = 46) and a HCAP other than NHAP (O‐HCAP) group (n = 33). These groups were then compared with respect to laboratory data, microbiological findings and mortality. Results: Thirty‐day mortality in the NHAP group (10.9%) tended to be higher than that in the CAP group (3.3%) or the O‐HCAP group (0%). The pathogens most frequently identified were Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae in the CAP group, methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Klebsiella pneumoniae in the NHAP group, and S. pneumoniae and K. pneumoniae in the O‐HCAP group. Conclusions: The NHAP group was clinically different from the O‐HCAP group, based on bacteriological examination and mortality rates. In order to accurately diagnose, and formulate optimum treatment strategies for Japanese patients, the categories of HCAP, as specified in the ATS/IDSA guidelines, should not be applied directly either to patients with NHAP or those with O‐HCAP.