The Glycophosphatidylinositol Anchor of the MCMV Evasin,m157, Facilitates Optimal Cell Surface Expression and Ly49 Receptor Recognition

The murine cytomegalovirus-encoded protein m157 is a cognate ligand for both inhibitory and activating receptors expressed by natural killer cells. Additionally, m157 is expressed on the surface of infected cells by a glycophosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor. Although endogenous GPI-anchored proteins are known to be ligands for the NK cell receptor, NKG2D, the contribution of the GPI anchor for viral m157 ligand function is unknown. To determine whether the GPI anchor for m157 is dispensable for m157 function, we generated m157 variants expressed as transmembrane fusion proteins and tested cells expressing transmembrane m157 for the capacity to activate cognate Ly49 receptors. We found that the GPI anchor is required for high-level cell surface expression of m157, and that the transmembrane m157 ligand retains the capacity to activate reporter cells and NK cells expressing Ly49H, as well as Ly49I¹²⁹ reporter cells, but with reduced potency. Importantly, target cells expressing the transmembrane form of m157 were killed less efficiently and failed to mediate Ly49H receptor downregulation on fresh NK cells compared to targets expressing GPI-anchored m157. Taken together, these results show that the GPI anchor for m157 facilitates robust cell surface expression, and that NK cells are sensitive to the altered cell surface expression of this potent viral evasin.     

The omega-site sequence of glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae can determine distribution between the membrane and the cell wall

Glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored cell wall proteins play an important role in the structure and function of the cell wall in yeast and other fungi. Although the majority of characterized fungal GPI-anchored proteins do in fact localize to the cell wall, some are believed to reside at the plasma membrane and not to traffic significantly to the cell wall. There is evidence suggesting that the amino acids immediately upstream of the site of GPI anchor addition (the omega site) serve as the signal determining whether a GPI protein localizes to the cell wall or to the plasma membrane, although this remains controversial. Here, we examine in detail the functional and biochemical differences between the GPI anchor addition signals of putative cell wall (CW) and plasma membrane (PM) GPI proteins. We find strong evidence for the existence of PM-class and CW-class GPI proteins. We show that the biological function of a GPI-CWP is strongly compromised by changing the GPI anchor signal from a CW-class signal to a PM-class signal. Biochemically, this abrogation of function corresponds to a change in the protein from a cell wall form to a membrane form. To understand better the basis for the difference between the two classes of proteins, we mutated the amino acids upstream of the omega site in a GPI-PM protein and selected mutant proteins that were now localized to the cell wall. We were also able to design simple amino acid mutations in a GPI-CW protein that efficiently redirected the protein to the plasma membrane. These studies make clear that different GPI anchor sequences can have dramatic effects on localization of the proteins and help to define the GPI anchor addition signal sequences that distinguish the PM-class and CW-class GPI proteins.     

Yeast Gaa1p is required for attachment of a completed GPI anchor onto proteins

Anchoring of proteins to membranes by glycosylphosphatidylinositols (GPIs) is ubiquitous among all eukaryotes and heavily used by parasitic protozoa. GPI is synthesized and transferred en bloc to form GPI- anchored proteins. The key enzyme in this process is a putative GPI:protein transamidase that would cleave a peptide bond near the COOH terminus of the protein and attach the GPI by an amide linkage. We have identified a gene, GAA1, encoding an essential ER protein required for GPI anchoring. gaal mutant cells synthesize the complete GPI anchor precursor at nonpermissive temperatures, but do not attach it to proteins. Overexpression of GAA1 improves the ability of cells to attach anchors to a GPI-anchored protein with a mutant anchor attachment site. Therefore, Gaa1p is required for a terminal step of GPI anchor attachment and could be part of the putative GPI:protein transamidase.     

Sphingomyelin chain length influences the distribution of GPI-anchored proteins in rafts in supported lipid bilayers

Glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored proteins are enriched in cholesterol- and sphingolipid-rich lipid rafts within the membrane. Rafts are known to have roles in cellular organization and function, but little is understood about the factors controlling the distribution of proteins in rafts. We have used atomic force microscopy to directly visualize proteins in supported lipid bilayers composed of equimolar sphingomyelin, dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine and cholesterol. The transmembrane anchored angiotensin converting enzyme (TM-ACE) was excluded from the liquid ordered raft domains. Replacement of the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains of TM-ACE with a GPI anchor (GPI-ACE) promoted the association of the protein with rafts in the bilayers formed with brain sphingomyelin (mainly C18:0). Association with the rafts did not occur if the shorter chain egg sphingomyelin (mainly C16:0) was used. The distribution of GPI-anchored proteins in supported lipid bilayers was investigated further using membrane dipeptidase (MDP) whose GPI anchor contains distearoyl phosphatidylinositol. MDP was also excluded from rafts when egg sphingomyelin was used but associated with raft domains formed using brain sphingomyelin. The effect of sphingomyelin chain length on the distribution of GPI-anchored proteins in rafts was verified using synthetic palmitoyl or stearoyl sphingomyelin. Both GPI-ACE and MDP only associated with the longer chain stearoyl sphingomyelin rafts. These data obtained using supported lipid bilayers provide the first direct evidence that the nature of the membrane-anchoring domain influences the association of a protein with lipid rafts and that acyl chain length hydrophobic mismatch influences the distribution of GPI-anchored proteins in rafts.     

Glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored proteins: structure, function, and cleavage by phosphatidylinositol-specific phospholipase C.

A wide variety of proteins are tethered by a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor to the extracellular face of eukaryotic plasma membranes, where they are involved in a number of functions ranging from enzymatic catalysis to adhesion. The exact function of the GPI anchor has been the subject of much speculation. It appears to act as an intracellular signal targeting proteins to the apical surface in polarized cells. GPI-anchored proteins are sorted into sphingolipid- and cholesterol-rich microdomains, known as lipid rafts, before transport to the membrane surface. Their localization in raft microdomains may explain the involvement of this class of proteins in signal transduction processes. Substantial evidence suggests that GPI-anchored proteins may interact closely with the bilayer surface, so that their functions may be modulated by the biophysical properties of the membrane. The presence of the anchor appears to impose conformational restraints, and its removal may alter the catalytic properties and structure of a GPI-anchored protein. Release of GPI-anchored proteins from the cell surface by specific phospholipases may play a key role in regulation of their surface expression and functional properties. Reconstitution of GPI-anchored proteins into bilayers of defined phospholipids provides a powerful tool with which to explore the interactions of these proteins with the membrane and investigate how bilayer properties modulate their structure, function, and cleavage by phospholipases.     

AtPGAP1 functions as a GPI inositol-deacylase required for efficient transport of GPI-anchored proteins

Glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored proteins (GPI-APs) play an important role in a variety of plant biological processes including growth, stress response, morphogenesis, signaling, and cell wall biosynthesis. The GPI anchor contains a lipid-linked glycan backbone that is synthesized in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) where it is subsequently transferred to the C-terminus of proteins containing a GPI signal peptide by a GPI transamidase. Once the GPI anchor is attached to the protein, the glycan and lipid moieties are remodeled. In mammals and yeast, this remodeling is required for GPI-APs to be included in Coat Protein II-coated vesicles for their ER export and subsequent transport to the cell surface. The first reaction of lipid remodeling is the removal of the acyl chain from the inositol group by Bst1p (yeast) and Post-GPI Attachment to Proteins Inositol Deacylase 1 (PGAP1, mammals). In this work, we have used a loss-of-function approach to study the role of PGAP1/Bst1 like genes in plants. We have found that Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) PGAP1 localizes to the ER and likely functions as the GPI inositol-deacylase that cleaves the acyl chain from the inositol ring of the GPI anchor. In addition, we show that PGAP1 function is required for efficient ER export and transport to the cell surface of GPI-APs.

The inositol deacylase AtPGAP1 mediates the first step of glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor-lipid remodeling and is required for efficient transport of GPI-anchored proteins     

N-Glycans mediate the apical sorting of a GPI-anchored, raft-associated protein in Madin-Darby canine kidney cells.

Glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol (GPI)- anchored proteins are preferentially transported to the apical cell surface of polarized Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells. It has been assumed that the GPI anchor itself acts as an apical determinant by its interaction with sphingolipid-cholesterol rafts. We modified the rat growth hormone (rGH), an unglycosylated, unpolarized secreted protein, into a GPI-anchored protein and analyzed its surface delivery in polarized MDCK cells. The addition of a GPI anchor to rGH did not lead to an increase in apical delivery of the protein. However, addition of N-glycans to GPI-anchored rGH resulted in predominant apical delivery, suggesting that N-glycans act as apical sorting signals on GPI-anchored proteins as they do on transmembrane and secretory proteins. In contrast to the GPI-anchored rGH, a transmembrane form of rGH which was not raft-associated accumulated intracellularly. Addition of N-glycans to this chimeric protein prevented intracellular accumulation and led to apical delivery.     

Specific inhibition of GPI-anchored protein function by homing and self-association of specific GPI anchors

The functional specificity conferred by glycophosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchors on certain membrane proteins may arise from their occupancy of specific membrane microdomains. We show that membrane proteins with noninteractive external domains attached to the same carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) GPI anchor, but not to unrelated neural cell adhesion molecule GPI anchors, colocalize on the cell surface, confirming that the GPI anchor mediates association with specific membrane domains and providing a mechanism for specific signaling. This directed targeting was exploited by coexpressing an external domain-defective protein with a functional protein, both with the CEA GPI anchor. The result was a complete loss of signaling capabilities (through integrin-ECM interaction) and cellular effect (differentiation blockage) of the active protein, which involved an alteration of the size of the microdomains occupied by the active protein. This work clarifies how the GPI anchor can determine protein function, while offering a novel method for its modulation.     

An internally positioned signal can direct attachment of a glycophospholipid membrane anchor

All known glycophosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored membrane proteins contain a COOH-terminal hydrophobic domain necessary for signalling anchor attachment. To examine the requirement that this signal be at the COOH terminus of the protein, we constructed a chimeric protein, DAFhGH, in which human growth hormone (hGH) was fused to the COOH terminus of decay accelerating factor (DAF) (a GPI-anchored protein), thereby placing the GPI signal in the middle of the chimeric protein. We show that the fusion protein appears to be processed at the normal DAF processing site in COS cells, producing GPI-anchored DAF on the cell surface. This result indicates that the GPI signal does not have to be at the COOH terminus to direct anchor addition, suggesting that the absence of a hydrophilic COOH-terminal extension (beyond the hydrophobic domain) is not a necessary requirement for GPI anchoring. A similar DAFhGH fusion, containing an internal GPI signal in which the DAF hydrophobic domain was replaced with the signal peptide of hGH, also produced GPI-anchored cell surface DAF. The signal for GPI attachment thus exhibits neither position specificity nor sequence specificity. In addition, mutant DAF or DAFhGH constructs lacking an NH2-terminal signal peptide failed to produce GPI-anchored protein, suggesting that membrane translocation is necessary for anchor addition.     

C-terminal hydrophobic region in human bone marrow stromal cell antigen 2 (BST-2)/tetherin protein functions as second transmembrane motif

BST-2/CD317/HM1.24/tetherin is a host factor that inhibits the release of HIV-1 and other enveloped viruses. Structurally, tetherin consists of an N-terminal transmembrane (TM) region, a central coiled coil motif, and a putative C-terminal glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor motif. A current working model proposes that BST-2 inhibits virus release by physically tethering viral particles to the cell surface via its TM motif and GPI anchor. Here we analyzed the functional importance of the C-terminal GPI anchor motif in BST-2. We replaced the GPI anchor motif in BST-2 with the TM regions of several surface markers and found that the TM motifs of CD40 and transferrin receptor, but not that of CD45, could functionally substitute for a GPI anchor in BST-2. Conversely, replacing the TM region of CD4 by the putative GPI anchor signal of human BST-2 resulted in proper membrane targeting and surface expression of the chimeric protein, indicating that the BST-2 GPI anchor signal can function as a bona fide TM region. In fact, attempts to demonstrate GPI anchor modification of human BST-2 by biochemical methods failed. Our results demonstrate that the putative C-terminal GPI anchor motif in human BST-2 fulfills the requirements of a bona fide TM motif, leading us to propose that human BST-2 may in fact contain a second TM segment rather than a GPI anchor.     

The Fate of PrP GPI‐Anchor Signal Peptide is Modulated by P238S Pathogenic Mutation

Glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)‐anchored proteins are localized to the plasma membrane via a C‐terminally linked GPI anchor. The GPI anchor is added concomitantly to the cleavage of the carboxy‐terminal GPI‐anchor signal sequence, thereby causing the release of a C‐terminal hydrophobic peptide, whose fate has not yet been investigated. Here we followed the fate of the GPI‐attachment signal of the prion protein (PrP), a protein implicated in various types of transmissible neurodegenerative spongiform encephalopathies (TSE). The PrP GPI‐anchor signal sequence shows a remarkable and unusual degree of conservation across the species and contains two point mutations (M232R/T and P238S) that are responsible for genetic forms of prion disorders. We show that the PrP GPI‐anchor signal peptide (SP), but not the one from an unrelated GPI‐anchored protein (folate receptor), undergoes degradation via the proteasome. Moreover, the P238S point mutation partially protects the PrP GPI‐anchor SP from degradation. Our data provide the first attempt to address the fate of a GPI‐anchor SP and identify a role for the P238S mutation, suggesting the possibility that the PrP GPI‐anchor SP could play a role in neurodegenerative prion diseases.      

Efficient glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) modification of membrane proteins requires a C-terminal anchoring signal of marginal hydrophobicity

Many plasma membrane proteins are anchored to the membrane via a C-terminal glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) moiety. The GPI anchor is attached to the protein in the endoplasmic reticulum by transamidation, a reaction in which a C-terminal GPI-attachment signal is cleaved off concomitantly with addition of the GPI moiety. GPI-attachment signals are poorly conserved on the sequence level but are all composed of a polar segment that includes the GPI-attachment site followed by a hydrophobic segment located at the very C terminus of the protein. Here, we show that efficient GPI modification requires that the hydrophobicity of the C-terminal segment is "marginal": less hydrophobic than type II transmembrane anchors and more hydrophobic than the most hydrophobic segments found in secreted proteins. We further show that the GPI-attachment signal can be modified by the transamidase irrespective of whether it is first released into the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum or is retained in the endoplasmic reticulum membrane.     

Sphingomyelin chain length influences the distribution of GPI-anchored proteins in rafts in supported lipid bilayers

Glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored proteins are enriched in cholesterol- and sphingolipid-rich lipid rafts within the membrane. Rafts are known to have roles in cellular organization and function, but little is understood about the factors controlling the distribution of proteins in rafts. We have used atomic force microscopy to directly visualize proteins in supported lipid bilayers composed of equimolar sphingomyelin, dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine and cholesterol. The transmembrane anchored angiotensin converting enzyme (TM-ACE) was excluded from the liquid ordered raft domains. Replacement of the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains of TM-ACE with a GPI anchor (GPI-ACE) promoted the association of the protein with rafts in the bilayers formed with brain sphingomyelin (mainly C18:0). Association with the rafts did not occur if the shorter chain egg sphingomyelin (mainly C16:0) was used. The distribution of GPI-anchored proteins in supported lipid bilayers was investigated further using membrane dipeptidase (MDP) whose GPI anchor contains distearoyl phosphatidylinositol. MDP was also excluded from rafts when egg sphingomyelin was used but associated with raft domains formed using brain sphingomyelin. The effect of sphingomyelin chain length on the distribution of GPI-anchored proteins in rafts was verified using synthetic palmitoyl or stearoyl sphingomyelin. Both GPI-ACE and MDP only associated with the longer chain stearoyl sphingomyelin rafts. These data obtained using supported lipid bilayers provide the first direct evidence that the nature of the membrane-anchoring domain influences the association of a protein with lipid rafts and that acyl chain length hydrophobic mismatch influences the distribution of GPI-anchored proteins in rafts.     

Proper protein folding in the endoplasmic reticulum is required for attachment of a glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor in plants

Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) quality control processes recognize and eliminate misfolded proteins to maintain cellular protein homeostasis and prevent the accumulation of defective proteins in the secretory pathway. Glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored proteins carry a glycolipid modification, which provides an efficient ER export signal and potentially prevents the entry into ER-associated degradation (ERAD), which is one of the major pathways for clearance of terminally misfolded proteins from the ER. Here, we analyzed the degradation routes of different misfolded glycoproteins carrying a C-terminal GPI-attachment signal peptide in Arabidopsis thaliana. We found that a fusion protein consisting of the misfolded extracellular domain from Arabidopsis STRUBBELIG and the GPI-anchor attachment sequence of COBRA1 was efficiently targeted to hydroxymethylglutaryl reductase degradation protein 1 complex-mediated ERAD without the detectable attachment of a GPI anchor. Non-native variants of the GPI-anchored lipid transfer protein 1 (LTPG1) that lack a severely misfolded domain, on the other hand, are modified with a GPI anchor and targeted to the vacuole for degradation. Impaired processing of the GPI-anchoring signal peptide by mutation of the cleavage site or in a GPI-transamidase-compromised mutant caused ER retention and routed the non-native LTPG1 to ERAD. Collectively, these results indicate that for severely misfolded proteins, ER quality control processes are dominant over ER export. For less severely misfolded proteins, the GPI anchor provides an efficient ER export signal resulting in transport to the vacuole.

Severely misfolded proteins carrying a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchor attachment sequence undergo a stringent quality control process in the endoplasmic reticulum that prevents GPI anchoring.     

Recognition of the carboxyl-terminal signal for GPI modification requires translocation of its hydrophobic domain across the ER membrane

A carboxyl-terminal hydrophobic domain is an essential component of the processed signal for attachment of the glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol (GPI) membrane anchor to proteins and it is linked to the site (omega) of GPI modification by a spacer domain. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that the hydrophobic domain interacts with the lipid bilayer of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane to optimally position the omega site for GPI modification. The hydrophobic domain of the GPI signal in the human folate receptor (FR) type alpha was substituted with the carboxyl-terminal segment of the low-density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR), including its membrane spanning region, without altering either the spacer or the omega site. The FR-alpha/LDLR chimera was not GPI modified but was attached to the plasma membrane by a polypeptide anchor. When the carboxyl-terminal half of the hydrophobic transmembrane polypeptide in the FR-alpha/LDLR chimera was altered by introduction of negatively charged (Asp) residues, or when the cytosolic domain in the chimera was deleted, the mutated proteins became GPI-anchored. On the other hand, attachment of a carboxyl-terminal segment of LDLR including the entire cytosolic domain to FR-alpha converted it into a transmembrane protein. The results indicate that in the FR-alpha/LDLR chimera the inability of the cellular machinery for GPI modification to recognize the hydrophobic domain is not due to the intrinsic nature of the peptide, but is rather due to the retention of the peptide within the lipid bilayer. It follows that the hydrophobic domain in the signal for GPI modification must traverse the ER membrane prior to recognition of the omega site by the GPI-protein transamidase. The results thus establish a critical topographical requirement for recognition of the GPI signal in the ER.     

Deletion of GPI7, a yeast gene required for addition of a side chain to the glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) core structure, affects GPI protein transport, remodeling, and cell wall integrity.

Gpi7 was isolated by screening for mutants defective in the surface expression of glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) proteins. Gpi7 mutants are deficient in YJL062w, herein named GPI7. GPI7 is not essential, but its deletion renders cells hypersensitive to Calcofluor White, indicating cell wall fragility. Several aspects of GPI biosynthesis are disturbed in Deltagpi7. The extent of anchor remodeling, i.e. replacement of the primary lipid moiety of GPI anchors by ceramide, is significantly reduced, and the transport of GPI proteins to the Golgi is delayed. Gpi7p is a highly glycosylated integral membrane protein with 9-11 predicted transmembrane domains in the C-terminal part and a large, hydrophilic N-terminal ectodomain. The bulk of Gpi7p is located at the plasma membrane, but a small amount is found in the endoplasmic reticulum. GPI7 has homologues in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Caenorhabditis elegans, and man, but the precise biochemical function of this protein family is unknown. Based on the analysis of M4, an abnormal GPI lipid accumulating in gpi7, we propose that Gpi7p adds a side chain onto the GPI core structure. Indeed, when compared with complete GPI lipids, M4 lacks a previously unrecognized phosphodiester-linked side chain, possibly an ethanolamine phosphate. Gpi7p contains significant homology with phosphodiesterases suggesting that Gpi7p itself is the transferase adding a side chain to the alpha1,6-linked mannose of the GPI core structure.     

Glycophospholipid membrane anchor attachment. Molecular analysis of the cleavage/attachment site.

The COOH terminus of decay accelerating factor (DAF) contains a signal that directs attachment of a glycophosphatidylinositol (GPI) membrane anchor in a process involving proteolytic removal of 17-31 COOH-terminal residues. Previous work suggested that two elements are required for anchor addition, a COOH-terminal hydrophobic domain (the GPI signal) and an element located NH2-terminal to it, postulated to be the cleavage/attachment site. Using [3H]ethanolamine (a component of the anchor) to tag the COOH terminus, we isolated and sequenced a COOH-terminal tryptic peptide, thereby identifying Ser-319 as the COOH-terminal residue attached to the GPI anchor. This indicates that a 28-residue peptide is removed during processing and localizes the cleavage/attachment site precisely to the region previously shown to be required for anchor attachment (between 10 and 20 residues NH2-terminal to the hydrophobic domain). Since DAF contains multiple cryptic cleavage/attachment sites, we used a GPI-linked human growth hormone-DAF fusion to study the structural requirements for cleavage/attachment. Our results show that while sequences immediately NH2-terminal to the attachment site are not required for anchor addition, deletion of Ser-319 abolishes both anchor attachment and transport to the cell surface. Systematic replacement of the attachment site serine with all possible amino acids indicated that alanine, aspartate, asparagine, glycine, or serine efficiently support GPI anchor attachment while valine and glutamate are partially effective. All other substitutions including cysteine (permitted at the attachment site in other GPI-anchored proteins) abolish both GPI anchor attachment and transport to the cell surface, resulting in accumulation of uncleaved fusion protein in internal compartments (endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi). These results support the general rule that the residue at the cleavage/attachment site must be small. Further, addition of a GPI anchor appears to be necessary for transport to the cell surface in transfected COS cells.