AHG and DTE/AHG procedure identification of crossmatch-appropriate donor-recipient pairings that result in improved graft survival

We compared our standard NIH (extended incubation) crossmatch (XM) with antihuman globulin (AHG) and flow cytometry crossmatches (FCXM) and correlated the results with primary cadaveric and retransplant graft survivals. In addition, we treated the XM sera with the reducing reagent dithioerythritol (DTE) to discriminate IgM from IgG immunoglobulin reactivity. For the 166 CsA-Pred-treated primary cadaveric renal allograft recipients the 1-year graft survival rate following an NIH-NEG XM was 81%. NIH-XM-NEG recipients who were also AHG-XM-NEG displayed an 82% 1-year graft survival as well. In contrast, NIH-NEG, but AHG-POS XM primary CAD recipients displayed a significantly reduced graft survival rate of 67%. Treatment of AHG-POS XM sera with DTE-delineated DTE/AHG-NEG and POS crossmatches associated with significantly different graft survivals of 83% and 0%, respectively, for these primary recipients. Flow cytometry XM results did not improve on the AHG-NEG or DTE/AHG-NEG XM primary graft survivals. These results were seen whether testing pre-Tx or historical (Hx) sera. For Re-Tx recipients an AHG-NEG XM resulted in significantly improved graft survival compared with the NIH-XM-NEG results. The overall 1-year graft survival rate for the 70 Re-Tx recipients studied was 64% (following a NEG pre-Tx NIH-XM). Re-Tx recipients with an AHG-NEG XM displayed an improved graft survival compared with NIH-XM-NEG recipients (77% vs. 64%, P less than 0.05) and with AHG-POS recipients (77% vs. 36%, P less than 0.01). However, treatment of Re-Tx, AHG-POS sera with DTE resulted in comparably poor graft survival rates of 31% and 50% for DTE/AHG-NEG and POS crossmatches, respectively. A FCXM did not improve on the results of Re-Tx graft survival following an AHG-NEG XM. These results were obtained whether testing pre-Tx or Hx sera. HLA matching, PRA, and the time the first Tx was lost did not influence the Re-Tx graft survival outcome following an AHG-NEG XM. Therefore, successful primary cadaveric renal allograft survival can be accomplished following either an AHG-NEG XM or an AHG-DTE-NEG XM. Re-Tx graft survival is significantly improved following an AHG-NEG XM. Re-Tx recipients with an AHG-POS XM who are either DTE/AHG-POS or -NEG display reduced graft survivals compared with AHG-NEG Re-Tx recipients.     

The role of flow cytometry-detected IgG and IgM anti-donor antibodies in cardiac allograft recipients

BACKGROUND: At our transplant center, cardiac allograft recipients undergo transplantation following a negative IgG anti-human globulin (AHG) crossmatch (XM). Flow cytometry crossmatching (FCXM) is a more sensitive XM procedure than the AHG XM procedure, yet there is limited information regarding the clinical relevance of FCXM to cardiac allograft outcome. METHODS: FCXM was performed retrospectively using the pretransplant sera from 140 recipients of primary cardiac allografts who underwent transplantation after AHG-IgG-NEG XM. The FCXM results were correlated to posttransplant rejection and patient survival. RESULTS: All of the patients were auto-XM-NEG. Twenty-two of 140 patients (16%) displayed IgG(+) FCXM and had a significantly poorer 1-year survival rate than did 57 of the FCXM-NEG recipients (68% vs. 86%, P<0.02). Moreover, 50% of the IgG(+) FCXM recipients experienced early rejections (< or =14 days postoperatively) compared with only 16% for the FCXM-NEG recipients (P<0.01). The survival rate of 92% for IgM(+) FCXM recipients (n=37) was significantly improved compared with the 86% survival rate for FCXM-NEG control recipients (P<0.05), suggesting a protective role for IgM. Consistent with this interpretation is that the 1-year survival rate of 79% for the IgG, IgM FCXM(+) recipients (n=24) was significantly better than the 68% survival rate for the IgG(+) FCXM recipients (P<0.02). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that IgG(+) FCXM identifies a subset of AHG-IgG-NEG XM cardiac allograft recipients who are at risk for early rejections and poor survival. In contrast, the presence of IgM may be beneficial to survival.     

Flow cytometry-detected IgG is not a contraindication to renal transplantation: IgM may be beneficial to outcome

BACKGROUND: At our transplant center, primary recipients of either a haplo-identical (haplo-ID) living related (LRD) or a cadaveric (CAD) donor renal allograft are transplanted after a negative donor-specific IgG anti-human globulin (AHG) cross-match (XM). Testing included the historically highest panel-reactive antibody and the immediate (0-7 days) pretransplant sera. A positive donor specific IgM-AHG XM has not been a contraindication to transplant. Reports suggest that donor-specific flow cytometry cross-matches (FCXM) may be more clinically informative than the AHG-XM. METHODS: We therefore evaluated the impact of a positive FCXM (IgG or IgM) on the rejection frequency (0-12 months after transplant) and 1-year graft survival for cyclosporine-prednisone-treated primary (haplo-ID and CAD) renal allograft recipients. All transplants were performed after a negative donor-specific IgG AHG-XM regardless of the IgM-AHG XM status. RESULTS: Rejection frequencies (26% vs. 31%, P = NS) and 1-year graft survivals (92% vs. 89%, P = NS) were comparable for haplo-ID LRD FCXM-negative and IgG-FCXM-positive recipients. However, IgM-FCXM-positive LRD recipients experienced significantly fewer rejections (13% vs. 26% P<0.02) and an improved 1-year graft survival (100% vs. 92%, P<0.02) than FCXM-negative LRD recipients. Similar results were observed for primary CAD recipients. Rejection frequencies (40% vs. 44%, P = NS) and 1-year graft survivals (83% vs. 81%, P = NS) were comparable for primary CAD FCXM-negative and IgG-FCXM-positive recipients. Again, IgM-FCXM-positive primary CAD recipients experienced significantly fewer rejections (22% vs. 40%, P<0.02) and improved 1-year graft survivals (89% vs. 83%, P<0.05) than FCXM-negative recipients. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that, after a negative donor-specific IgG-AHG XM, an IgG-positive FCXM is not a contraindication to transplantation. The presence of IgM may be beneficial in reducing the occurrence of rejection episodes and improving graft survivals.     

The impact of HLA A, B, and DR blood transfusions and immune responder status on cardiac allograft recipients treated with cyclosporine

From July 1982 to August 1986, 137 patients received heart allografts at our transplant (Tx) center. Recipients were treated postoperatively with cyclosporine (CsA) and prednisone (Pred), with a minority of patients receiving CsA, Pred, and azathioprine (Aza) as immunosuppression. The impact of pre-Tx immune factors on survival was evaluated, including HLA A, B, and DR mismatches (MM), blood transfusions (BT), immune responder status, crossmatch results, and donor and recipient AIDS-virus (human immunodeficiency virus, HIV-1) status. The overall patient survivals were 75%, 68%, and 62% at one, two, and three years respectively. Pre-Tx, 15/137 (11%) recipient sera and 5/137 (3.6%) donor sera were HIV-1 reactive in both enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and Western blot antibody assays. Two of the 5 recipients of HIV-1 (+) donor allografts are alive 11 and 29 months post-Tx, whereas the other 3 recipients died at 1, 31, and 36 months post-Tx from diseases unrelated to AIDS. All 5 were pre-Tx HIV-1 nonreactive. The survivals for the 15 recipients who tested pre-Tx HIV-1 (+) were 87%, 87%, and 69% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively, comparable to the overall group survivals. Pre-Tx strong and weak immune responders had comparable 12-month survivals of 73% and 80%, respectively. Six patients displayed a positive pre-Tx donor crossmatch, two were attributed to autoantibody, and 4 were attributed to donor T cell reactivity. Five of the six patients presently survive 14, 16, 30, 36, and 44 months post-Tx. Recipients treated pre-Tx with 1-4 BTs displayed significantly better 12-month survival (81% vs. 69%, P less than 0.05) and fewer rejections (1.3 +/- 0.9 vs. 1.9 +/- 1.0, P less than 0.05) than untransfused recipients. Recipients of a 0-1 vs. 2 DR donor antigen-mismatch experienced fewer rejections (1.3 +/- 1.0 vs. 1.8 +/- 1.1, P less than 0.05). Evaluation of the combined influence of HLA DR as well as pre-Tx BTs suggested a significantly improved survival (80% vs. 61%, P less than 0.05) and fewer rejection episodes (1.4 +/- 0.9 vs. 2.0 +/- 1.1, P less than 0.05) for 29 well-matched, transfused (0-1 DR MM and 1-4 BT) compared with 43 poorly matched, untransfused (2 DR MM and 0-BT) heart allograft recipients. Moreover, the benefit of DR matching was only observed in untransfused, but not transfused, cardiac recipients.     

Flow cytometry crossmatching as a predictor of acute rejection in sensitized recipients of cadaveric renal transplants

Flow cytometry crossmatching (FCXM) was developed as a more sensitive assay than the standard complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDCXM) for the detection of anti-donor antibodies, that mediate hyperacute rejection and graft loss in the early post-transplant period in renal transplant recipients. The role of FCXM in predicting long-term clinical outcome in renal allograft recipients is unclear. This study examines the role of FCXM in predicting long-term clinical outcome in highly sensitized recipients of cadaveric renal transplants. All patients (n = 100) with peak panel reactive antibody (PRA) levels > 30%, who received cadaveric renal transplants between 1/1/'90 and 12/31/'95 at our institution, were divided into FCXM + and FCXM - groups. The incidence of acute rejection was determined for each group during the first yr after transplant. Graft survival rates at 1, 2, and 3 yr, and creatinine levels were also compared between groups. FCXM + patients experienced a higher incidence of acute rejection during the first yr after transplant (69 vs. 45%), and a higher percentage of FCXM + patients had more than one episode of acute rejection during the first yr after transplant (34 vs. 8%) when compared to FCXM - patients. There was no statistically significant difference in 1-, 2-, or 3-yr graft survival between FCXM + and FCXM - patients (76 vs. 83, 62 vs. 80, 62 vs. 72%, respectively). These results suggest that sensitized FCXM + cadaveric renal transplant recipients have a higher incidence of acute rejection episodes in the first yr after transplant. Given the association of multiple rejection episodes with poor long-term allograft survival, FCXM may be a useful predictor of long-term clinical outcome in this sub-group of renal transplant recipients.     

Possible contribution of pretransplant immune responder status to renal allograft survival differences of black versus white recipients.

Black end-stage renal disease patients may present as an immunologically higher-risk group for renal allograft transplantation than white ESRD patients. To test this hypothesis, we correlated graft survivals in 124 black and 241 white cyclosporine-prednisone-treated primary cadaveric renal allograft recipients with pre-Tx nonspecific immune responder status (strong vs. weak immune responders), donor-recipient-specific MLC responsiveness, HLA match, and blood transfusion (BT) history. One-, 2- and 3-year patient survival rates of 95%, 94%, and 94% were identical for both groups. However, the 1-, 2-, 3-year graft survival rates for white recipients of 82%, 79%, and 75% were significantly higher than the 70%, 62%, and 55% rates for black recipients (P less than 0.01 for each, respectively). Pre-Tx nonspecific immune response values for blacks were significantly (P less than 0.01) higher than for whites (38% vs. 28% for active T cell; 1.8 vs. 1.3 for TH:TS ratio; 28,581 c.p.m. vs. 14,870 c.p.m. for spontaneous blastogenesis; and a stimulation index (SI) of 34 vs. 20 for panel mixed lymphocyte culture). Additionally, the specific recipient-donor MLC (SI) for black recipients was significantly greater than the specific recipient-donor MLC for white recipients (MLC SI of 40 vs. 18, P less than 0.01). Blacks present as pre-Tx strong immune responders with a greater frequency than whites (90% vs. 66%, P less than 0.01). Moreover, black strong responders experience a poorer 1-year graft survival than white strong responders (67% vs. 80%, P less than 0.01). Even though the pre-Tx BT histories of white and black ESRD patients studied herein were comparable, the immunoregulatory effect of pre-Tx BT was different in white vs. black patients. A significant reduction in TH:TS ratio was observed when comparing 0 vs. 1-4 pre-Tx white patient BT groups, whereas significant changes in TH:TS ratios were not observed until after comparing 0 vs. greater than or equal to 5 pre-Tx black patient BT groups. HLA matching and pre-Tx BT had no impact on improving the graft survivals of these CsA-Pred-treated white or black recipients. These data, therefore, support the hypothesis that black recipients present as an immunologically higher-risk group than white recipients.     

Diagnosis and treatment of acute humoral rejection after kidney transplantation: preliminary experience

BACKGROUND: Acute humoral rejection, or rejection associated with de novo production of anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSA) after kidney transplantation (KTx), is a clinicopathologic entity that is not completely understood. Recent studies have proposed criteria for its diagnosis, including: (1) steroid-resistant acute dysfunction; (2) positive post-Tx donor-specific crossmatch (XM); and (3) widespread C4d deposits in peritubular capillaries (PTC) upon renal biopsy. METHODS: During 2002, prospective screening for AHR was established at our unit, seeking DSA post-KTx in selected cases of steroid-resistant acute rejection or acute dysfunction in high-risk sensitized or re-Tx patients. Frozen donor lymphocytes were used for post-Tx flow cytometry (FC) XM and high-definition flow PRA for patients with no frozen donor cells. We treated patients diagnosed with DSA using plasma exchange and polyclonal immunoglobulin. RESULTS: Post-Tx DSA studies were performed in 9 of 94 patients transplanted during 2002. We detected DSA post-Tx in 3 of 9 recipients: 2 by FCXM and 1 using high-definition flow PRA. Two were highly sensitized pre-Tx, but the third patient was a 70-year-old woman receiving a first Tx (PRA=0%). All 3 recipients presented with severe steroid-resistant acute renal dysfunction during the first 2 weeks post-Tx. Biopsies showed some features of AHR (neutrophils in PTC); 1 case showed no signs of concomitant cellular rejection. All rejection episodes were treated successfully (XM became negative and renal function recovered) by combining plasma exchange and polyclonal immunoglobulin. CONCLUSIONS: The use of specific tools, like the crossmatch, in cases of acute, steroid-resistant renal graft dysfunction is important to identify and treat otherwise undetected humoral mechanisms of rejection.     

The flow cytometric crossmatch and early renal transplant loss

Data from this retrospective study indicate that a positive two-color T and/or B cell flow cytometric crossmatch (FCXM) is predictive of early renal allograft loss (less than 2 months) in cadaveric kidney donor recipients who had a negative crossmatch by the antihuman globulin complement-dependent cytotoxicity technique. Among 90 cadaveric kidney donor recipients (67 primary, 23 regrafts), 14 (8 primary, 6 regrafts) lost their renal allografts within 2 months, and 10 of the 14 were FCXM positive and HLA sensitized. The remaining 76 allografts survived beyond 2 months, 12 of which were FCXM-positive. Thus, the FCXM sensitivity rate for detecting early graft loss was 71%, and the specificity rate was 84%. Cadaveric graft-loss rates at 2 months were 33% for primary and 60% for FCXM-positive regrafts in contrast to 7% for primary and 0% for FCXM-negative regrafts. The difference in early graft loss between FCXM-positive and FCXM-negative recipients was statistically significant (P less than 0.0001). Subset analyses of FCXM-positive graft recipients indicate: (1) previous early graft loss contraindicates transplantation of an FXCM-positive regraft (P = 0.03); and (2) panel reactive antibody (PRA) less than or equal to 10% at crossmatch is not associated with early graft loss (P = 0.04). There was no significant difference in 1-year graft survival between primary and regrafts in either FCXM-negative recipients (85% vs. 77%, respectively) or FCXM-positive recipients (67% vs. 40%). All 12 of the FCXM-positive primary and regrafts that survived 2 months continued to function at 2 years. Stepwise logistic regression analysis of 5 independent predictor variables (FCXM status, gender, primary vs. regraft status, PRA level, and HLA mismatched antigens) indicated that the FCXM test was the best predictor of early graft loss. When FCXM results of the 90 cadaveric graft recipients were ranked in three groups, an FCXM channel shift of 29 or greater (third tertile) on a 1024 channel log scale was associated with a 7.0-fold (95% confidence interval 1.9-25.5) increased risk of early graft failure when compared to the first two tertiles. These data indicate that the FCXM offers an additional approach for identifying sensitized patients at risk of early renal allograft loss.     

Clinical significance of a positive flow crossmatch on the outcomes of cadaveric renal transplants

Pretransplantation crossmatching is an integral part of kidney transplantation. Flow cytometric crossmatch (FCXM) is more sensitive than complement-dependent cytotoxic crossmatch (CDC-XM). However, the clinical significance of positive FCXM with negative CDC-XM is controversial. We evaluated FCXM in 455 consecutive deceased donor renal transplants. All had a negative CDC-XM. There were 341 T-cell and B-cell FCXM negative and 38 T-cell and B-cell positive. There was a higher percentage of retransplantations and HLA mismatches (26.3% vs 8.2%, P= .002 and 2.45 vs 1.99, P= .02, respectively) in the FCXM-positive group compared with the FCXM-negative group; 65.8% of the FCXM-positive patients had rejection compared with 49.3% of the FCXM-negative patients (odds ratio [OR]=1.89, P= .06). FCXM-positive patients had a higher incidence of vascular rejection (28.9% vs 12.6%, OR=2.68, P= .008). One- and 5-year graft survivals were 84% and 66% in the FCXM-positive group vs 90% and 75% in the FCXM-negative group. Censoring for patient death, 1- and 5-year graft survivals were 84% and 73% in the FCXM-positive group vs 94% and 82% in the FCXM-negative group. There was no difference in renal function between the 2 groups. In conclusion, a positive T-cell and B-cell FCXM transplant with a negative CDC-XM is associated with a higher incidence of rejection, twice the risk of vascular rejection, and a trend toward poorer graft survival.     

Renal Transplantation With Final Allocation Based on the Virtual Crossmatch

Solid phase immunoassays (SPI) are now routinely used to detect HLA antibodies. However, the flow cytometric crossmatch (FCXM) remains the established method for assessing final donor–recipient compatibility. Since 2005 we have followed a protocol whereby the final allocation decision for renal transplantation is based on SPI (not the FCXM). Here we report long‐term graft outcomes for 508 consecutive kidney transplants using this protocol. All recipients were negative for donor‐specific antibody by SPI. Primary outcomes are graft survival and incidence of acute rejection within 1 year (AR <1 year) for FCXM+ (n = 54) and FCXM? (n = 454) recipients. Median follow‐up is 7.1 years. FCXM+ recipients were significantly different from FCXM? recipients for the following risk factors: living donor (24% vs. 39%, p = 0.03), duration of dialysis (31.0 months vs. 13.5 months, p = 0.008), retransplants (17% vs. 7.3%, p = 0.04), % sensitized (63% vs. 19%, p = 0.001), and PRA >80% (20% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.001). Despite these differences, 5‐year actual graft survival rates are 87% and 84%, respectively. AR <1 year occurred in 13% FCXM+ and 12% FCXM? recipients. Crossmatch status was not associated with graft outcomes in any univariate or multivariate model. Renal transplantation can be performed successfully, using SPI as the definitive test for donor–recipient compatibility.     

The clinical significance of flow cytometry crossmatching in heart transplantation.

OBJECTIVE: Flow cytometry crossmatching (FCXM) is more sensitive than the cytotoxic crossmatch in identifying preformed antibodies to donor alloantigens, but its clinical importance is controversial. The objective of this study was to determine the association of a FCXM with survival and incidence of vascular rejection in cardiac transplant recipients with a negative cytotoxic crossmatch. METHODS: Between 1993 and 1998, 357 heart transplant recipients with a negative T cell cytotoxic crossmatch were studied by three-color FCXM to quantitate anti-donor IgG reactions against B and T lymphocytes. Reactions positive against both were consistent with human leukocyte antigen (HLA) Class I reactivity, and those against B cells only were considered to be against HLA Class II antigens. Endpoints were episodes of vascular rejection, death from acute and chronic rejection and overall survival. RESULTS: Fifty patients were FCXM for Class I-positive, 144 for Class II-positive, and 163 were negative. At 1 month, freedom from vascular rejection was 64% in Class I patients, but 90% and 96% in Class II or negative crossmatch patients (P<0.0001). Survival of the negative crossmatch group was higher than either Class I or II groups (94%, 74% and 76%, respectively, at 3 years; P<0.0001). Death from acute rejection was 3% and 2% at 3 years in negative or Class II-positive patients, but 19% in Class I patients (P<0.0001). Death from chronic rejection occurred only in Class II patients (P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Despite a negative T-cell cytotoxic crossmatch, a positive flow cytometry crossmatch correlates with important clinical events after heart transplantation.     

New crossmatch technique eliminates interference by humanized and chimeric monoclonal antibodies

Humanized and chimeric antilymphocyte antibodies (Ab) are used to prevent and treat rejection and for treatment of human disease. Rituximab (RIT, anti-CD20), daclizumab (DAC; anti-CD25), alemtuzumab (ALE; anti-CD52), or infliximab (IFX) may interfere with Ab detection methods such as complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) and flow cytometric crossmatch (FCXM). These agents are recognized as anti-human Ab or fix complement and are not differentiated from anti-allo-Ab. A new enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay crossmatch (XM) utilizing class I and II HLA antigens from donor cells called Transplant Monitoring System (TMS; GTI, Waukesha, Wisc) potentially precludes interference by eliminating non-major histocompatability complex antigens. To test this, normal sera (nonsensitized volunteers) were supplemented with 0.1 or 10 microg/mL of RIT, DAC, IFX or ALE, and were tested using three methods: the TMS T-cell CDCXM with antihuman globulin (AHG); and B-cell CDCXM without AHG; and FCXM with mean channel shifts of 45 and 150 indicating positive T-cell and B-cell crossmatch, respectively. No reactivity occurred with normal sera using any crossmatch technique. At 0.1 and 10 microg/mL, RIT interfered with CDC B-cell, but not T-cell crossmatch. RIT at 10, but not 0.1 microg/mL interfered with B-cell FCXM. No interference occurred with RIT in T-cell FCXM or TMS. ALE interfered with B-cell and T-cell CDC and FCXM but neither class I nor II TMS. DAC did not interfere with CDC or FCXM at 0.1 microg/mL, but gave false positive B-cell FCXM and CDCXM with some samples. No interference by DAC occurred using TMS. TMS may be useful to differentiate de novo donor-specific Ab after treatment with humanized or chimeric Ab.     

Successful renal transplantation despite low levels of donor-specific HLA class I antibody without IVIg or plasmapheresis

We prospectively transplanted 10 primary kidney recipients with deceased donor organs (nine kidney and one pancreas/kidney) when their flow cytometric T-cell IgG, HLA class I donor-specific crossmatch was positive but the AHG T-cell crossmatch was negative, with a median follow-up of 1.8 yr. No pre- or peri-operative IVIg or plasmapheresis was administered to any patient. All but one of the 11 organs transplanted into patients with a flow T(+)/AHG(-) crossmatch is currently functioning despite the continued presence of circulating low levels of HLA class I antibody. Flow HLA class I antigen-coated beads showed the presence of at least one donor-specific HLA class I antibody at transplantation in each of the 10 cases. No rejections were observed in seven of the 10 cases (70%). Six rejection episodes, four cellular and two humoral, occurred in three patients. Each rejection was successfully treated. The only graft loss occurred in a kidney recipient on day 667 secondary to ischemia to the kidney because of cardiac surgery. Thus, short-term (one to two years) graft survival in primary transplants was not influenced by low levels of donor-specific HLA class I antibody present at transplantation and no prophylactic treatment such as IVIg, plasmapheresis, anti-CD20 or splenectomy was needed peri-operatively.     

Successful transplantation of 100 untransfused cyclosporine-treated primary recipients of cadaveric renal allografts

This report examines the effect of pretransplant (pre-Tx) blood transfusions (BT) on the patient and graft survival results of 320 cyclosporine (CsA) and prednisone (Pred)-treated primary (1 degree) recipients of cadaveric (CAD) donor renal allografts. The 320 CsA-Pred treated 1 degree-CAD recipients included 100 pre-Tx untransfused (O-BT) and 220 transfused patients. The overall patient survival at 12, 24, and 36 months post-Tx were 94%, 94%, and 93%, respectively. There were no differences observed in graft survivals at 12, 24, or 36 months post-Tx whether patients received 0, 1-4, greater than or equal to 5-10 or greater than 10 pre-Tx BTs. A mean serum creatinine of 1.9 +/- 0.7 mg/dl was comparable among all BT groups at 12, 24, and 36 months post-Tx. The frequency of rejection episodes--namely, 37% for O-BT and 36% for greater than O-BT were identical. High-risk patients (greater than 45 years of age, diabetics, or blacks) were comparably distributed in O-BT and greater than O-BT groups and did not impact on the data. Similarly, increasing panel-reactive antibodies (PRA), associated with increasing numbers of pre-Tx BTs, did not influence the data. When HLA A, B, and DR matching results were combined with the BT groupings no differences were observed in patient or graft survivals. Poorly matched and untransfused recipients did as well as well-matched, transfused recipients. These findings suggest that CsA-Pred immunosuppressive therapy allows for successful 1 degree-CAD renal allograft transplantation without the need for pretransplant blood transfusion conditioning or matching of donor HLA A, B, and DR antigens to recipients.     

Transplantation with positive complement-dependent microcytotoxicity crossmatch in contemporary kidney transplantation: Practice patterns and associated outcomes

We analyzed clinical factors and graft survival associated with complement-dependent microcytotoxicity (CDC) crossmatch (XM) positive (+) kidney transplants in 1995 to 2009 United Network of Sharing (UNOS) registry data. CDCXM negative (-) transplants were selected from centers and years in which at least one CDCXM+ transplant was performed at a given center in a given year. CDCXM+ and CDCXM- results were compared with bivariate and multivariate survival analysis. Our observations are as follows: (1) The risk of graft loss with CDCXM+ vs. CDCXM- results was markedly lower than the risk observed historically, e.g., living donor (LD)-CDCXM+ absolute all-cause graft survival reductions were 0.7% at 24 hours (P=0.007), 2.9% at one year (P <0.0001), 3.7% at five years (P<0.0001); deceased donor (DD)-CDCXM+ absolute graft survival reductions were 0.7% at 24 hours (P=0.02), 3.5% at one year (P <0.0001), 2.7% at five years (P=0.0009). On covariate adjustment, the only significant association of CDCXM+ vs. CDCXM- results was with one-year graft loss risk: LD aHR 1.44 (95% CI 1.05-1.96), DD aHR 1.33 (CI 1.10-1.61). (2) CDCXM+ transplantation was more commonly performed among groups disadvantaged with respect to transplant access, including sensitized, previously transplanted women and black recipients. (3) In CDCXM+ recipients, there was a high percentage of flow cytometry (FC) XM- and autoXM+ results. After removing these groups, outcomes with CDCXM+ results were relatively good. (4) CDCXM+/FCXM+ vs. CDCXM-/FCXM- graft loss risk was observed only in LD recipients transplanted at centers performing fewer than 10 such transplants during the study period: 11.0% reduction (P<0.0001) and aHR of 2.86 (CI 1.18-6.94) at one year; 14.7% reduction (P<0.0001) and aHR of 1.77 (CI 0.88-3.58) at five years. Although using CDCXM+ as a contraindication to transplantation has been associated with virtual elimination of hyperacute rejection, the negative effect of a CDCXM+ in contemporary practice is relatively small, questioning the value of the CDCXM as a standalone test.     

Significant differences in the efficacy of kidney transplantation between Hungarian Caucasians and Gypsies

In a retrospective study we examined the differences between Caucasian (Group A) and Gypsy (Group B) renal allograft recipients transplanted in Hungary. From 1983 to 2001, 1918 transplants were performed in Budapest (1825 Caucasian and 93 Gypsy recipients). Group B patients were younger (34 +/- 12 vs 42 +/- 14 years of age; P < .01) and Group A had more polycystic kidney disease (12% vs 3%; P < .025). Blood group B was more common in Group B (27% vs 19%; P = NS) than in Group A patients, and Group A had seemingly more diabetes (5% vs 1%; P = NS) than did Group B. There were no differences in HLA mismatches or panel reactive antibodies (PRA). No differences were seen in Group A vs Group B patient survivals at 1, 3, 5, or 10 years' posttransplant (98% vs 95%; 90% vs 93%; 85% vs 88%; and 74% vs 82%, respectively). However, Group A graft survivals were significantly better than Group B at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years' posttransplant (89% vs 77%; 82% vs 66%; 76% vs 54%; and 57% vs 34%; each comparison P < .01). Group B recipients experienced a greater number of acute rejection episodes (66% vs 49%; P < .01), irreversible acute rejections (15% vs 6%; P < .001), chronic rejections (34% vs 18%; P < .001), and graft loss due to immunosuppression noncompliance (5% vs 1%; P < .05) than did Group A recipients. As has been previously described for other non-Caucasian ethnic groups (eg, African-Americans), Hungarian Gypsies appear to be at a greater immunological risk for rejection and poorer long-term graft survival.     

Value of a flow cytometry cross‐match in the setting of a negative complement‐dependent cytotoxicity cross‐match in heart transplant recipients

Complement‐dependent cytotoxicity cross‐match (CDCXM) is used for evaluation of preformed HLA‐specific antibodies in patients undergoing heart transplantation. Flow cytometry cross‐match (FCXM) is a more sensitive assay and used with increasing frequency. To determine the clinical relevance of a positive FCXM in the context of negative CDCXM in heart transplantation, the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database was analyzed. Kaplan‐Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard modeling were used to assess graft survival for three different patient cohorts defined by cross‐match results: T‐cell and B‐cell CDCXM+ (“CDCXM+” cohort), CDCXM? but T‐cell and/or B‐cell FCXM+ (“FCXM+” cohort), and T‐cell/B‐cell CDCXM? and FCXM‐ (“XM?” cohort). During the study period, 2558 patients met inclusion criteria (10.7% CDCXM+, 18.8% FCXM+, 65.5% XM?). CDCXM+ patients had significantly decreased graft survival compared to FCXM+ and XM? cohorts (P = .003 and <.001, respectively). CDCXM? and FCXM+ patients did not have decreased graft survival compared to XM? patients (P = .09). In multivariate analysis, only CDCXM+ was associated with decreased graft survival (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.01‐1.49). In conclusion, positive FCXM in the context of negative CDCXM does not confer increased risk of graft failure. Further study is needed to understand implications of CDCXM and FCXM testing in heart transplant recipients.     

Comparison of two drug regimens upon clinical outcome among renal transplant recipients with positive flow cytometric crossmatches

Renal transplant recipients with positive flow cytometric crossmatches (FCXM) face greater risk of early rejection and graft failure. It is clear that the pharmacologic needs of this high risk group have not been identified. We retrospectively compared the impact of two drug regimens upon early rejection and 5 yr actuarial survival among 324 primary cadaveric transplant recipients with positive and negative FCXM. Patients received either Regimen I (OKT3 induction, cyclosporine and steroids) or Regimen II (mycophenolate mofetil with cyclosporine or Prograf). Recipient gender, age, disease etiology, ethnic distribution and cytotoxic panel reactive antibody (PRA) were equivalent between regimens (p=ns). With Regimen I, the incidence of rejection was greater for FCXM positive vs. FCXM negative patients (51 vs. 21%, p=0.001). In contrast, with Regimen II the incidence of rejection for FCXM positive and FCXM negative patients was equivalent (18 vs. 12%, p=ns) and lower than patients treated with Regimen I (p < 0.01). Ethnic variation was only observed with Regimen I in which African Americans with positive FCXM had more rejections than Caucasians (60 vs. 45%, p < 0.05). Five-year actuarial survival was lower for FCXM positive vs. FCXM negative patients treated with Regimen I (40 vs. 75%, p=0.0006) or Regimen 2 (60 vs. 90%, p=0.001). Allograft survival was equivalent (p=ns) among FCXM positive individuals receiving Regimen I or II. However, allograft survival among FCXM negative individuals improved with Regimen II (p < 0.05). Ethnic variation in survival was not observed with either regimen (p=ns).     

The utility of cytolytic flow cytometry crossmatch before kidney transplantation

The donor/recipient matching in kidney transplantation is based on approved laboratory tests, which are complement-dependent cytotoxic crossmatch (CDC-XM) and flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM). Both have some disadvantages: CDC-XM has low sensitivity, whereas FCXM does not differentiate between lytic vs. non-lytic alloantibodies. To find an improved method, we have developed a new crossmatch technique of cytolytic flow cytometry crossmatch (cFCXM), which allows for sensitive detection of clinically relevant complement-binding antibodies. The cFCXM assay detects dead cells with viability dye that ensue from the binding of allospecific lytic antibodies. In our study, 135 unsensitized kidney transplant recipients were recruited based on the CDC-XM and FCXM results and the clinical utility of cFCXM was evaluated. The 5-year follow-up for acute rejection incidents revealed that cFCXM could verify the clinical relevance of positive FCXM results as recipients with positive FCXM but negative CDC-XM had the same risk of rejection as patients with both negative CDC-XM/FCXM results. These findings suggest that cFCXM assay may provide more precise immunological risk assessment in kidney transplant recipients.     

Specificity of preformed alloantibodies causing B cell positive flow crossmatch in renal transplantation

The specificity of alloantibodies (alloAb) and their clinical significance in association with T-/B+ flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM) in kidney transplantation are not clearly defined. This study was undertaken to examine the HLA specificity and clinical relevance of Ab causing B+ FCXM in pre-transplant (final XM) recipients' serum samples. Final FCXM serum samples were analyzed from 457 renal transplant patients followed for 10 months post-transplantation. Two hundred and sixty patients had T-/B+ final FCXM. The control group included 197 recipients with T-/B- FCXM at time of transplantation. Class I/class II PRA and specificity of anti-HLA class I and class II Ab in final FCXM serum samples were analyzed by FlowPRA Class I Screening Test and FlowPRA Class II Screening Test. We found no correlation between graft outcome and pre-transplant T-/B- and T-/B+ FCXM status. Additionally, we observed no clinical relevance of B+ FCXM in retransplant patients. However, MCS > or =200 in B+ FCXM retransplant recipients was associated with anti-class II Ab to previous mismatches in regrafted patients (n = 46). This finding was confirmed by specificity analysis of anti-DR/DQ Ab in patients with high ( > or =15%) class II PRA. In 63% (12 of 19) of retransplants having T-/B+ FCXM, we defined the specificity of alloAb to first graft mismatched class II antigens. In contrast, anti-class II Ab was detected in only 5.7% (2 of 35) of single-graft recipients with different PRA values. Significantly greater MCS (240 +/- 61 vs. 163 +/- 48; p = 0.022) was observed in retransplant patients having short ( < or =5 m) previous graft survival time (PGST) than in those with long PGST ( > or =5 m). Only 2% of retransplant recipients with B + FCXM had non-HLA Ab. In contrast, the overwhelming majority of primary recipients had no detectable alloAbs. No significant difference in class I PRA was found between B- and B+ FCXM recipients. However, class II PRA was significantly higher in patients having B + FCXM (p = 0.028). Collectively, these data show that MCS intensity is not always a reliable criterion for anti-HLA Ab detection because of the presence of non-HLA Ab. These results can be explained by low titers of anti-class II Ab, at which concentration these Ab cannot produce a deleterious effect. FlowPRA and Flow screen beads appeared to be reliable and sensitive methods for detection and specificity analysis of anti-class II alloAb.