心房颤动导管消融术后电复律即刻成功预测因素分析

目的:对影响心房颤动导管消融术后3个月内复发患者直流电复律成功率的因素进行回顾性研究。方法:连续入选2010年11月至2011年11月,在北京安贞医院心内科二病房行持续性心房颤动导管消融术,且在术后3个月内因持续性房性心律失常住院行电复律的患者。禁食状态下,地西泮静脉注射镇静,行双向同步直流电复律,除颤电极片置于心尖区及胸骨旁右侧,能量依次采用50～200J。结果:共入选63例患者,年龄33～69岁,平均心房颤动病史14.6个月,左心房直径(42.8±5.2)mm,左心室射血分数(62.9±5.3)%。复发持续性心律失常中46%为心房扑动,54%为心房颤动,共进行97次电复律。患者即刻复律成功率为77%,其中80%一次放电复律成功。在年龄、性别、合并疾病、左心室射血分数、术前是否服用心律平等方面,即刻复律成功组与即刻失败组相比,两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。单因素分析示年龄、左心房扩大心房颤动持续时间与电复律即刻成功率显著相关。进行Logistic回归分析校正上述因素后发现,术前心房颤动持续时间(OR=0.957,95%CI:0.921～0.994,P=0.023)和术前服用胺碘酮是复律成功率的独立预测因素。即刻成功的定义是复律后维持窦性心律>24 h。结论:心房颤动导管消融术后早期复发的患者,术前心房颤动持续时间和术前服用胺碘酮是电复律即刻成功的独立预测因素。     

心脏人工瓣膜置换术后直流同步电复律治疗持续性房颤的临床研究

目的研究人工瓣膜置换术后慢性房颤直流同步电复律治疗的成功率与安全性。方法对瓣膜病伴有持续性房颤人工瓣膜置换术后患者,术后3个月心脏彩超左房内径大小恢复至≤50mm,服用华法令抗凝INR值在2～3之间的318例患者,加用口服胺碘酮片200mg,1日3次,厄贝沙坦片150mg,1日1次,用7天后若未自行转复者行200焦尔直流同步电复律。转复成功后继用胺碘酮片200mg,1日1次,厄贝沙坦片150mg,1日1次,60天后停用。结果318例人工瓣膜置换术后,除3例在用药期间自动转复为窦性心律外,315例患者电复律即刻成功率为98.7%(311/315),平均随访2.7±1.3年,电复律远期维持率在97.8%(308/315),窦性心律总维持率97.8%(311/318)。结论人工瓣膜置换术后直流同步电复律治疗慢性房颤安全好,转复率高。慢性房颤持续时间不是电复律主要禁忌证,手术前、后左房大小决定即刻成功率和随访维持率,转复为窦性心律后心功能改善明显。     

持续性房颤电复律后射频消融术中成功率及术后短期复发率的研究

【】目的 通过研究持续性房颤经电复律成功后再行射频消融术治疗与直接行射频消融术治疗的术中直接复律效果,探索更适宜接受射频消融术治疗的持续性房颤人群特点。方法 回顾分析2011年9月------2014年1月在我院行房颤射频消融术的54例持续性房颤患者,根据术前是否经同经步直流电复律为窦性心律,且维持窦性心律维持超过3个月,分为2组。A组术前经同经步直流电复律为窦性心律并维持窦性心律维持超过3个月后再发房颤,再接受射频消融术治疗16例,B组未行电复律,直接射频消融术治疗38例,比较2组术中射频消融直接恢复窦性心律比率及术后6个月房颤复发率。结果 术中直接复律率A组高于B组(56.2% VS 26.3% p =0.035)6个月复发率A组低于B组(18.8％ VS 47.3％, p =0.045)。结论 经电复律后可较长时间维持窦性心律的持续性房颤患者接受射频消融术治疗复律成功率较高,早期复发率低。     

持续性心房颤动线性消融的五年随访结果

目的 导管消融对于持续性心房颤动(房颤)的远期疗效存在争议,本研究旨在观察基于心房基质改良的线性消融对持续性房颤的远期疗效,并探讨消融术式与消融远期成功率的关系.方法 回顾性分析了87例因药物无效而接受了步进式线性消融的持续性或长程持续性房颤病例,依据房颤能否被消融转复为窦性心律分为消融转复组和消融加电复律组并平均随访至术后5.3年.结果 87例患者中有50例(57.5％)术中通过线性消融直接终止了房颤,37例(42.5％)患者线性消融无法转复,除1例之外均行电复律成功.平均随访(5.3±1.0)年,单次消融后34例(39％)患者维持窦性心律,其中消融转复组24例(48％),消融加电复律组10例(27％)可维持窦性心律,消融转复组的远期成功率高于消融加电复律组(P=0.047).结论 对于持续性或长程持续性房颤患者,通过线性消融策略进行心房基质改良消融可能有助于提高远期成功率.术中通过消融直接转复为窦性心律是远期成功率的预测因素.     

尼非卡兰在心房颤动射频消融中的初步运用

目的观察心房颤动(简称房颤)消融术中环使用尼非卡兰复律的有效性及安全性。方法行导管消融治疗的房颤患者41例,术中行环肺静脉电隔离(CPVI)后心律仍为房颤,经静脉给予尼非卡兰注射液(50 mg)(负荷量0.3 mg/Kg 5 min,后予维持剂量(0.4 mg·Kg~(-1)·h~(-1))转复。术后予心电监护2 h。以60例同期行CPVI术但心律为房颤而行电复律患者作为对照组,比较两组即刻转复成功率,不良反应发生率,术后1、3个月超过30 s房性心律失常发生率。结果尼非卡兰组31例转复为窦性心律(简称窦律),3例转为心房扑动,进一步消融后转复为窦律,另3例患者仍为房颤,行电复律后转为窦律。电复律组1例3次电复律后仍不能维持窦律。尼非卡兰组即刻复律成功率低于电复律组(31/41 vs 59/60,P<0.05)。尼非卡兰组1例出现心室颤动,电复律组3例出现嗜睡、6例出现呕吐、1例出现低血压。术后7天内及1个月内超过30 s房性心律失常发生情况,尼非卡兰组为9/41,12/41;18/60,22/60,P>0.05。结论观察初步表明房颤消融CPVI后使用尼非卡兰复律具有较高的成功率,其不良反应发生率较低。     

经导管心房除颤在射频消融术中的应用

报道 9例心房颤动 (简称房颤 )患者在射频消融术中用经导管心房同步电除颤的结果。其中有房颤发作史者 5例 ,余 4例为心内电生理检查时诱发。房颤发作时采用普通电生理导管及消融导管在冠状窦与右心耳间放电。9例成功转复为窦性心律 ,平均放电 2 .2次 ,复律成功所需功率为 8.5 6± 4.95J。除 1例需 2 0J转复为窦性心律患者感轻度胸痛外 ,其余仅有心脏轻度震动感。所有患者均未用镇静剂 ,无并发症发生。     

持续性房颤消融术后早期复发:电复律或二次消融

目的对持续性心房颤动导管消融术后1个月内复发快速房性心律失常患者,比较早期直流电复律治疗与早期消融治疗的临床效果,为临床决策提供证据,并对持续性房颤早期复发早期消融电生理特点进行分析。方法回顾性分析2010年6月至2011年6月121例首次消融术后1个月内复发房性心动过速的持续性房颤患者,其中早期电复律69例,早期二次消融52例,平均随访(11±5)个月,分析两组的临床效果及手术组二次手术电生理特点。结果 69例早期复律患者平均随访(11±5)个月,14例维持窦性心律。52例手术患者平均随访(10±4)个月,24例维持窦性心律,早期手术组成功率较早期复律组高(46.2%比20.3%,P=0.002)。Logistic回归分析发现,左心房大小及治疗手段是房颤二次复发的独立影响因素。电生理检查发现,52例早期手术患者中,33例(63%)有肺静脉电位恢复。左上肺静脉电位恢复最多,为16支。其余肺静脉电位恢复情况分别为:左下肺静脉14支;右上肺静脉12支;右下肺静脉10支。结论持续性房颤早期复发进行早期二次消融成功率较早期电复律高。肺静脉电位恢复是持续性房颤早期复发的常见现象。     

087 口服胺碘酮提高慢性房颤直流电复律功效

目的直流电复律广泛、有效的应用于房颤的治疗,但对于持续性房颤成功率低,且复律一年后仅有25%患者能维持窦性心律.对于如何预防性地抗心律失常治疗以提高电复律功效及减少复发,目前尚有争议.该文旨在研究复律前口服胺碘酮或静滴GIK极化液(glucose-insulin-potassium solution)能否提高电复律功效.     

导管消融术联合心腔内电复律治疗非阵发性心房颤动的远期复发因素研究

目的分析导管消融术联合心腔内电复律治疗非阵发性心房颤动(房颤)远期复发的影响因素。方法选取2009年1月至2014年12月上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院行多步骤递进式消融后,房颤仍未终止,术中再经静脉导管心腔内电复律法进行电复律的非阵发性房颤患者62例。随访12~48个月,对可能影响远期复发的因素进行分析。结果经导管消融术后持续房颤发作的所有非阵发性房颤患者,经静脉导管心腔内电复律治疗后均转复为窦性心律。根据是否远期复发,将患者分为复发组(26例)和未复发组(36例)。复发组患者的房颤病程显著长于未复发组[60(0.25,360)个月比24(0.25,120)个月,P=0.019],左心室重量指数[(150.16±34.48)g/m~2比(132.97±27.33)g/m~2,P=0.033]、左心房容积[(75.33±32.03)ml比(59.51±22.36)ml,P=0.025]、左心房容积指数[(40.70±15.81)ml/m~2比(32.21±12.76)ml/m~2,P=0.023]均显著高于未复发组,差异均有统计学意义。多因素回归分析显示,房颤病程是术后远期复发的独立危险因素(OR1.017,95%CI 1.003~1.032,P=0.017)。结论导管消融术联合经静脉导管心腔内电复律可将非阵发性房颤成功转复为窦性心律,房颤病程是患者远期复发的独立危险因素。     

持续性心房颤动导管消融术中不同终点与临床疗效关系

目的 评价持续性心房颤动(房颤)导管消融术中不同终点与临床成功率的关系.方法 2006年9月至2007年3月入选持续性房颤患者124例,男性76例,女性48例,平均年龄(62.4±11.5)岁.平均左心房内径(44.6±6.5)mm,平均房颤病程(2.34±3.5)年.消融术式采用Carto系统引导环肺静脉前庭隔离(CPVI)和心房复杂碎裂电位(CFAEs)消融,单Lasso导管标测肺静脉电位.按照消终点分组:CPVI终止房颤组、CPVI转化为房性心动过速(房速)组、CPVI+CFAEs终止房颤组、CPVI+CFAEs转化为房速组以及CPVI+CFAEs后仍为房颤组.消融结束未恢复窦性心律者均行直流电转复.消融术后随访心电图和24 h动态心电图.结果 所有患者顺利完成消融术.平均消融术时间(201±34)min,平均x线透视时间(23±12)min.CPVI恢复窦性心律4例,CPVI使房颤转变为房速5例(2例消融成功,3例消融未终止).共115例进行CFAEs标测和消融:20例转复为窦性心律;24例转化为房速(其中13例消融成功,11例消融未终止).共71例消融结束仍为房颤,均经直流电复律成功转复.术后平均随访(4.5±2.1)个月,共有34例患者接受再次消融.随访(9.5±2.7)个月,CPVI终止房颤组4例无复发,CPVI转化为房速组4例无复发,1例复发房速;CPVI+CFAEs终止房颤组17例无复发,2例复发房速,1例复发房颤;CPVI+CFAE8转化为房速组17例无复发,5例复发房速,2例复发房颤.CPVI+CFAEs仍为房颤组术后36例成功,25例复发房颤,10例复发房速,P=0.01.结论 持续性房颤消融术中不同终点影响临床成功率.消融术中恢复窦性心律或转变为房速成功率高,消融术中未恢复窦性心律或转变为房速消融成功率较低.     

Outcomes in Patients Requiring Cardioversion Following Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

Outcomes of Cardioversion Post AF Ablation.   Introduction: Early recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias is commonly noted after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). The long-term outcomes of patients who require cardioversion for persistent AF after AF ablation is not known. This study reports the outcomes of patients who underwent cardioversion for persistent AF or atrial flutter following an AF ablation procedure.
Methods: The patient population comprised 55 patients (mean age 58 ± 10 years, 35% paroxysmal) who underwent catheter ablation of AF and subsequently required electrical cardioversion for persistent AF (45 patients) or atrial flutter (10 patients). Cardioversion was defined as early (within 90 days of the ablation procedure) or late (between 90 and 180 days following ablation).
Results: The mean follow-up duration was 15 ± 8 months. Forty-six of the 55 patients (84%) patients experienced recurrence during follow-up. The average time to recurrence after cardioversion was 37 days. Of the 55 patients, 8 (15%) patients had a complete success, 11 (20%) patients had a partial success and 36 patients (65%) had a failed outcome. Seven of the 43 patients (16%) who underwent early cardioversion had a complete success as opposed to one of 12 patients (8%) who underwent late cardioversion (P = 0.49).
Conclusions: This study shows that >80% of patients who undergo cardioversion for persistent AF or atrial flutter after AF ablation have recurrence. The timing of cardioversion did not affect the outcome. These findings allow clinicians to provide realistic expectations to patients regarding the long-term outcome and/or requirement for a second ablation procedure. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 27–32, January 2010)     

Time to Cardioversion of Recurrent Atrial Arrhythmias After Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation and Long‐Term Clinical Outcome

Introduction: It is unclear whether early restoration of sinus rhythm in patients with persistent atrial arrhythmias after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) facilitates reverse atrial remodeling and promotes long‐term maintenance of sinus rhythm. The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between the time to restoration of sinus rhythm after a recurrence of an atrial arrhythmia and long‐term maintenance of sinus rhythm after radiofrequency catheter ablation of AF. Methods and Results: Radiofrequency catheter ablation was performed in 384 consecutive patients (age 60 ± 9 years) for paroxysmal (215 patients) or persistent AF (169 patients). Transthoracic cardioversion was performed in all 93 patients (24%) who presented with a persistent atrial arrhythmia: AF (n = 74) or atrial flutter (n = 19) at a mean of 51 ± 53 days from the recurrence of atrial arrhythmia and 88 ± 72 days from the ablation procedure. At a mean of 16 ± 10 months after the ablation procedure, 25 of 93 patients (27%) who underwent cardioversion were in sinus rhythm without antiarrhythmic therapy. Among the 46 patients who underwent cardioversion at ≤30 days after the recurrence, 23 (50%) were in sinus rhythm without antiarrhythmic therapy. On multivariate analysis of clinical variables, time to cardioversion within 30 days after the onset of atrial arrhythmia was the only independent predictor of maintenance of sinus rhythm in the absence of antiarrhythmic drug therapy after a single ablation procedure (OR 22.5; 95% CI 4.87–103.88, P < 0.001). Conclusion: Freedom from AF/flutter is achieved in approximately 50% of patients who undergo cardioversion within 30 days of a persistent atrial arrhythmia after catheter ablation of AF.     

导管射频消融治疗持续性心房颤动的体会

目的研究持续性心房颤动(房颤)导管射频消融最佳手术方式及复发心律失常的处理策略。方法2005年3月~2007年8月共40例持续性房颤患者接受导管射频消融治疗,三维电解剖标测系统指导下行环同侧肺静脉左心房线性消融;2005年的12例患者部分附加左心房峡部、右心房峡部、左心房顶部线性消融;2006年的12例患者常规进行左心房峡部、右心房峡部射频消融,部分患者附加碎裂电位、左心耳或根据术中的房性心律失常附加其他部位射频消融;2007年的16例患者则在上述基础上进行冠状窦左心房心内膜面射频消融。结果2005年复发8例(66.7%),2006年复发3例(25.0%),2007年复发4例(25.0%)。复发的患者中8例接受第二次导管射频消融术,其中5例维持窦性心律。平均随访(17.6±10.4)个月,总治疗成功率82.5%。结论持续性房颤患者在以肺静脉口为核心的导管射频消融前提下,适当改进导管射频消融策略,可以显著提高成功率。     

Clinical Significance of Early Recurrences of Atrial Tachycardia After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

Early Recurrence After AF Ablation. Background: Atrial tachycardia (AT) commonly recurs within 3 months after radiofrequency catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, it remains unclear whether early recurrence of atrial tachycardia (ERAT) predicts late recurrence of AF or AT. Methods: Of 352 consecutive patients who underwent circumferential pulmonary vein isolation with or without linear ablation(s) for AF, 56 patients (15.9%) with ERAT were identified by retrospective analysis. ERAT was defined as early relapse of AT within a 3‐month blanking period after ablation. Results: During 21.7 ± 12.5 months, the rate of late recurrence was higher in patients with ERAT (41.1%) compared with those without ERAT (11.8%, P < 0.001). In a multivariable model, positive inducibility of AF or AT immediately after ablation (65.2% vs 36.4%, P = 0.046; odd ratio, 3.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.0–14.6) and the number of patients who underwent cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation (73.9% vs 42.4%, P = 0.042; odd ratio, 4.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.1–19.5) were significantly related to late recurrence in the ERAT group. The duration of ablation (174.3 ± 62.3 vs 114.7 ± 39.5 minutes, P = 0.046) and the procedure time (329.3 ± 83.4 vs 279.2 ± 79.7 minutes, P = 0.027) were significantly longer in patients with late recurrence than in those without late recurrence following ERAT. Conclusions: The late recurrence rate is higher in the patients with ERAT compared with those without ERAT following AF ablation, and is more often noted in the patients who underwent CTI ablation and had a prolonged procedure time. Furthermore, inducibility of AF or AT immediately after ablation independently predicts late recurrence in patients with ERAT. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. 21, pp. 1331‐1337, December 2010)     

心房颤动射频消融术后晚期复发的相关因素

目的:分析心房颤动（房颤）经导管射频消融术后晚期复发的相关因素。方法:房颤患者117例接受经导管射频消融术治疗,术前进行常规检查评估,在CARTO三维标测系统指导下行左房环肺静脉消融,必要时加行左房线性消融、右房线性消融等策略。如果在消融结束后心电监护仍为房颤心律,则行体外电复律。通过术后随访（>3个月）确定房颤消融术后是否复发,收集相关的随访资料分析房颤术后晚期复发的预测因素。结果:①所有患者均完成环肺静脉隔离。58例患者在环肺静脉消融基础上加行左房线性消融、右房线性消融等方法。37例房颤患者在消融后房颤仍持续,经体外电转复均恢复窦律。32例(27.3%)患者在术后晚期复发。②单因素分析显示性别、并发器质性心脏病、房颤病程、持续性房颤、左房内径、左室射血分数和复律与术后房颤晚期复发相关（均P<0.05）。③经多因素分析后仅有性别、左房内径、房颤病程是房颤晚期复发的独立预测指标(分别P<0.05,P<0.05,P<0.01)。结论:性别、房颤病程、左房内径是房颤导管消融术后晚期复发的独立预测因素。     

阵发性心房颤动患者非肺静脉触发灶的诱发及消融

目的探讨环肺静脉电隔离（CPVI）术中静脉注射异丙肾上腺素（ISO）和三磷酸腺苷：ATP）,在检出阵发性心房颤动（房颤）非肺静脉触发灶中的价值。方法回顾性分析2010年4～12月色浙江邵逸夫医院心内科所有患者接受三维标测系统指导下CPVI术136例患者,其中87例消融前后分别应用ISO＋ATP诱发房颤,Lasso导管置于右上肺静脉口、消融导管置于左上肺静脉中,结合冠状静冰窦导管判断房颤的触发灶,然后通过消融验证。结果87例首次接受导管消融的阵发性房颤患者,吏用ISO＋ATP后16例证实有非肺静脉房颤触发灶。其中,消融前诱发8例房颤、1例房性心动过速（房塞）、1例频发房性早搏（房早）。2例消融前诱发的患者CPVI术后房性快速性心律失常（ATa）仍存在,余8例及5例消融前未被诱发者CPVI后再次诱发时又检出非肺静脉触发灶。其中,9例为房颤（起源上腔静脉5例、冠状静脉窦内靠近口部1例、左心房后壁2例、不明1例）,3例房性心动过速（均为冠状挣脉窦口起源）和1例频发房性早搏（上腔静脉起源）。14例患者在相应非肺静脉触发灶部位消融后心聿失常均终止,且不再被诱发。2例起源不明的房颤患者电复律后转为窦性心律。随访2年,单次手术或功率为87．5％（14／16）。结论静脉注射ISO＋ATP可简单有效地检出阵发性房颤非肺静脉触发灶。     

Characteristics and significance of very early recurrence of atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation

Very Early Recurrence of AF. Introduction: Early restoration of sinus rhythm following ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) facilitates reverse atrial remodeling and improves the long‐term outcome. The purpose of this study was to determine the predictors and outcome in patients with very early AF recurrences (< 2 days). Methods and Results: Ablation was performed in 339 consecutive AF patients (paroxysmal AF = 262). Biatrial voltage was mapped during sinus rhythm. If recurrent AF occurred within 2 days following the ablation, electrical cardioversion was performed to restore sinus rhythm. Very early recurrences of AF occurred in 39 (15%) patients with paroxysmal AF and 26 (34%) with nonparoxysmal AF. Patients with very early recurrence had a higher incidence of nonparoxysmal AF (40% vs 18.6%, P< 0.001), requirement of electrical cardioversion during procedure, larger left atrial (LA) diameter (43 ± 7 vs 39 ± 6 mm, P< 0.001), lower left ventricular ejection fraction (54 ± 10% vs 59 ± 7, P< 0.001), longer procedural time, and lower LA voltage (1.5 ± 0.7 vs 1.9 ± 0.8 mV, P< 0.001). A multivariate analysis revealed that the independent predictors of a very early recurrence were a longer procedural time and lower LA voltage. During a follow‐up of 13 ± 5 months, a very early recurrence did not predict the long‐term outcome of a single procedure recurrence in the patients with paroxysmal AF, but was associated with a late recurrence in the nonparoxysmal AF patients. Conclusion: Very early recurrence occurred in patients with paroxysmal AF is not associated with long‐term recurrence. Nonparoxysmal AF is an independent predictor of late recurrence of AF in patients with very early recurrence. (J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol, Vol. pp. 1‐6)     

Long-term single procedure efficacy of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation

Background Two important limitations of the data regarding the outcomes of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) are the short-term follow-up used in most published studies and the lack of single-procedure outcomes.Objective The objective was to report the long-term single-procedure outcomes at our center.Materials and methods The patient population was comprised of 200 consecutive patients who underwent ablation (133 men; age 56 ± 11 years). Atrial fibrillation was paroxysmal in 92 (46%). Success was defined as absence of symptomatic AF, off antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) after a single procedure.Results After a follow-up of 26 ± 11 months, the single-procedure long-term success rate was 28% with an additional 7% of patients demonstrating improvement. After including repeat procedures in 64 patients, the overall long-term success rate was 41% with 11% demonstrating improvement. Further subgroup analysis of 48 paroxysmal AF patients considered to be optimal candidates for the procedure, revealed a long-term success rate of 69% with an additional 4% demonstrating improvement. A major complication occurred in 7.9% of patients.Conclusion The results reveal that the long-term single-procedure success rate of catheter ablation of AF in a cohort of patients with predominantly non-paroxysmal AF is less than 40%. The inclusion of redo procedures resulted in an improvement in outcomes. A much higher success rate of 69% was achieved in patients with paroxysmal AF considered to be optimal candidates for this procedure. These results make it clear that further advances in the technique of catheter ablation of AF are needed to improve the safety and efficacy of this procedure. In order to be able to compare outcomes of various techniques in differing patient populations, we urge investigators to report long-term single procedure outcomes.This study was supported by The Norbert and Louise Grunwald Cardiac Arrhythmia Research Fund.     

70岁以上心房颤动患者导管射频消融治疗临床分析

目的 分析70岁以上心房如动(房颤)患者导管射频消融治疗成功率及术后复发危险因素.方技,选择导管射频消融的70岁以上房颤患者107例,收集患者临床和电生理资料,采用Cox比例风险回归模型分析房颤消融术后复发危险因素.结果 107例患者中,阵发性房颤89例.持续性房颤18例.平均随访(25.2±11.5)个月,单次消融成...