一个针对ASTER数据同时反演地表温度和比辐射率的四通道算法

本文利用对地观测卫星多传感器的特点，提出了针对ASTER数据同时反演地表温度和比辐射率的多通道算法。即利用ASTER数据的第11，12，13，14热红外波段建立热辐射传输方程，并通过对于地表比辐射率分析可知，ASTER4个热红外波段的比辐射率可以用近似线性方程表示，得到了6个方程6个未知数，从而形成了针对ASTER数据的同时反演地表温度和比辐射率的多通道算法。对于关键参数大气透过率，则是通过同一颗星的MODIS传感器的3个近红外波段反演大气水汽含量，然后用MODTRAN模拟大气水汽含量与ASTER热红外波段的统计关系，并进而根据这二关系来计算ASTER热红外波段的大气透过率。由于MODIS和ASTER是在同一颗星上。因此这种大气透过率估计方法保证了地表温度反演过程中所需大气参数的同步获取。     

利用不同地表比辐射率对ETM＋数据地表温度反演对比研究

地表温度作为研究环境生态影响的一个重要指标之一,以Landsat ETM+的热红外波段作为数据源,辅助大气透过率、大气平均气温等参数,利用单窗算法基于混合像元、NDVI、植被和裸露地三种不同地表比辐射率反演泉州市地表温度,对比分析结果表明采用这三种地表比辐射率反演地表温度的方法均是可行的,对于具体采用哪一种地表比辐射率应需要结合实际的研究区域地表地物的实际监测地表温度进行对比后,方可选择合适的地表比辐射率进行地表温度反演,会更具实际意义。反演结果可为城市热岛效应等研究提供支持数据源。     

利用MODIS数据分析山东半岛陆面温度的季节变化

探讨了MODIS数据的地表温度反演方法——分裂窗算法,该算法仅需要两个基本参数,大气透过率和地表比辐射率。这两个参数都可从同一景MODIS图像数据中直接反演出来,并保持较高的反演精度。利用该算法,反演了山东半岛的地表温度,并分析了该地区地表温度的季节变化和城市热岛强度。     

单窗算法结合Landsat8热红外数据反演地表温度

Landsat热红外系列数据一直是地表温度反演重要的遥感数据源,目前用于地表温度反演的单窗算法主要针对Landsat TM/ETM+第6波段数据(TM 6)建立的,Landsat 8热红外传感器(TIRS)与TM 6相比有很多变化,因而其单窗算法也需要改进。本文以Landsat 8 TIRS第10波段(TIRS 10)为数据源,提出了针对TIRS 10的单窗算法(TIRS10_SC),并对研究区地表温度进行反演研究,确定了研究区不同类型地表的温度值。研究结果表明:(1)TIRS10_SC算法可以较好地应用于Landsat 8数据的地表温度反演,平均反演误差为0.83℃,相关系数为0.805,反演温度与模拟数据和实测数据都具有较好的一致性;(2)通过对单窗算法中的地表发射率、大气水汽含量和大气平均作用温度等参数敏感性分析发现,TIRS10 SC算法能够获得较为可靠的反演结果;同时,TIRS10 SC算法对大气水汽含量和地表发射率敏感性较高,对大气平均作用温度敏感性稍弱。该算法对于利用Landsat 8 TIRS数据快速反演地表温度具有应用价值。     

地表温度反演方法

选用分裂窗算法,采用两因素模型对吉林省西部MODIS数据进行了连续3年的地表温度反演。通过对MODIS数据波段选取,分别计算星上亮度温度,采用基于植被指数与地表分类相结合的方法得到地表比辐射率,根据MODIS数据计算得到大气水汽含量,利用大气辐射传输模型得到大气透过率,最后,通过分裂窗算法模型反演出地表温度。实验结果表明,该方法能够获得较合理的地表温度反演结果,对农业旱灾动态监测具有一定应用价值。     

用MODIS数据和分裂窗算法反演内蒙古地区的地表温度

地表温度是气象、水文、生态等研究中一个重要参数。大气透过率和比辐射率是分裂窗算法的两个重要输入参数,本文利用MODIS数据的可见光波段(band1)和近红外波段(band2、19)计算该两个参数;再利用MODIS数据的两个热红外波段(band31、32)和分裂窗算法对内蒙古地区地表温度进行了反演;结果表明,遥感反演出来的地表温度的空间分布与内蒙古气候区地空间分布具有高度的一致性,能直观地反应内蒙古地区地表温度的空间分布特征。     

用MODIS影像和单窗算法反演环渤海地区的地表温度

在对地观测卫星MODIS的16个热红外波段中,其中有5个波段是针对地表温度来设计的,其中第31(10.78-11、28μm)和32(11．77-12．27μm)与TM的第6波段区间基本相同。运用单窗算法分别对这2个波段建立方程,然后通过对布郎克方程的辐射率和温度计算模拟,发现温度和辐射率近似线性相关,由此建立辐射率与温度T的线性方程,从而可以简化单窗算法的计算过程一最后运用单窗算法对31和32通道分别反演了环渤海地区的温度分布,并对环渤海地区的土地资源环境作了分析.     

基于大气温度和水汽含量改进HJ-1B地表温度反演

为了提高地面气象站稀少地区地表温度遥感反演的精度,本文基于多源遥感数据的优势,首先利用MODIS影像获取研究区像元尺度上平均大气水汽含量;然后利用同时相的HJ-1B影像估算区域地表比辐射率,再采用温度-植被指数法获取近地表大气温度;最后将以上3个参数输入单窗体算法,改进其地表温度反演的精度。研究结果表明,改进单窗体算法反演地表温度与地面实测温度的偏差小于1 K,为地面气象站点稀少的植被覆盖区域提供了一种可行的精确遥感反演地表温度方法。     

HJ-1B卫星三种反演地表温度模型的分析与验证

由于对不同的传感器,单通道算法中的经验公式必须根据相应的热红外波段特征重新进行拟合,该文以覆盖广州市的卫星影像HJ-1B/CCD和HJ-1B/IRS为数据源,利用基于同步面上像元尺度的多源遥感数据MOD021KM,并结合上下行辐射和地表比辐射率来反演大气水汽含量以及大气透射率。在此基础上,针对环境卫星,提出修正的普适性单通道算法、大气辐射传输方程算法和单窗算法3种模型,进行广州市地表温度反演,最后利用野外观测数据进行验证。结果表明,相比普适性单通道算法和单窗算法,辐射传输方程模型精度比较高。     

地表发射率不同的估算方法对地表温度的影响

随着遥感技术的日益成熟,用热红外波段反演地表温度的方法也日趋完善,其中一个关键参数--地表发射率的估算,直接影响着地表温度的反演结果。基于TM6的热红外波段,分别采用最常用的Van的地表发射率估算方法和综合了覃志豪与Sobrino的估算方法,对北京地区的地表温度进行了反演,并在此基础上对这2种估算方法所得结果进行了比较,从而为找出更为有效的地表发射率估算公式提供依据。结果表明,对于农林地2种估算方法都比较适合,但是对于水体和城市等人口密集地区,则需要和当地的实测数据进行比对,从而确定更为合适有效的估算方法,以得到更为精确的地表温度结果。     

Retrieval of land surface temperature (LST) from landsat TM6 and TIRS data by single channel radiative transfer algorithm using satellite and ground-based inputs

The present study proposes land surface temperature (LST) retrieval from satellite-based thermal IR data by single channel radiative transfer algorithm using atmospheric correction parameters derived from satellite-based and in-situ data and land surface emissivity (LSE) derived by a hybrid LSE model. For example, atmospheric transmittance (τ) was derived from Terra MODIS spectral radiance in atmospheric window and absorption bands, whereas the atmospheric path radiance and sky radiance were estimated using satellite- and ground-based in-situ solar radiation, geographic location and observation conditions. The hybrid LSE model which is coupled with ground-based emissivity measurements is more versatile than the previous LSE models and yields improved emissivity values by knowledge-based approach. It uses NDVI-based and NDVI Threshold method (NDVI^THM) based algorithms and field-measured emissivity values. The model is applicable for dense vegetation cover, mixed vegetation cover, bare earth including coal mining related land surface classes. The study was conducted in a coalfield of India badly affected by coal fire for decades. In a coal fire affected coalfield, LST would provide precise temperature difference between thermally anomalous coal fire pixels and background pixels to facilitate coal fire detection and monitoring. The derived LST products of the present study were compared with radiant temperature images across some of the prominent coal fire locations in the study area by graphical means and by some standard mathematical dispersion coefficients such as coefficient of variation, coefficient of quartile deviation, coefficient of quartile deviation for 3rd quartile vs. maximum temperature, coefficient of mean deviation (about median) indicating significant increase in the temperature difference among the pixels. The average temperature slope between adjacent pixels, which increases the potential of coal fire pixel detection from background pixels, is significantly larger in the derived LST products than the corresponding radiant temperature images.     

Investigation and validation of algorithms for estimating land surface temperature from Sentinel-3 SLSTR data

Land surface temperature (LST) is an important indicator of global ecological environment and climate change. The Sea and Land Surface Temperature Radiometer (SLSTR) onboard the recently launched Sentinel-3 satellites provides high-quality observations for estimating global LST. The algorithm of the official SLSTR LST product is a split-window algorithm (SWA) that implicitly assumes and utilizes knowledge of land surface emissivity (LSE). The main objective of this study is to investigate alternative SLSTR LST retrieval algorithms with an explicit use of LSE. Seventeen widely accepted SWAs, which explicitly utilize LSE, were selected as candidate algorithms. First, the SWAs were trained using a comprehensive global simulation dataset. Then, using simulation data as well as in-situ LST, the SWAs were evaluated according to their sensitivity and accuracy: eleven algorithms showed good training accuracy and nine of them exhibited low sensitivity to uncertainties in LSE and column water vapor content. Evaluation based on two global simulation datasets and a regional simulation dataset showed that these nine SWAs had similar accuracy with negligible systematic errors and RMSEs lower than 1.0 K. Validation based on in-situ LST obtained for six sites further confirmed the similar accuracies of the SWAs, with the lowest RMSE ranges of 1.57–1.62 K and 0.49−0.61 K for Gobabeb and Lake Constance, respectively. While the best two SWAs usually yielded good accuracy, the official SLSTR LST generally had lower accuracy. The SWAs identified and described in this study may serve as alternative algorithms for retrieving LST products from SLSTR data.     

Landsat卫星热红外数据地表温度遥感反演研究进展

作为驱动地表与大气之间能量交换的关键物理量,地表温度在众多领域中都发挥着重要作用,包括气候变化、环境监测、蒸散发估算以及地热异常勘探等。Landsat热红外数据因其时间连续性和高空间分辨率等特点被广泛应用于地表温度反演中。本文详细地介绍了Landsat热红外传感器及其可用的数据与产品的现状,梳理了2001年—2020年20年间基于Landsat热红外数据的地表温度遥感反演与应用的相关文献发表及互引情况,系统地综述了基于Landsat热红外数据的地表温度反演算法,包括基于辐射传输方程的算法、单窗算法、普适性单通道算法、实用单通道算法和分裂窗算法等。在此基础上,进一步介绍了每种算法的参数化方案,包括地表比辐射率和大气参数的估算方法。最后针对Landsat热红外数据地表温度遥感反演提出了未来可能的发展趋势与研究方向。     

热红外遥感地表温度与发射率地面验证进展

地表温度与发射率是地表—大气系统长波辐射和潜热通量交换的直接驱动力,是描述区域和全球尺度上地表能量平衡与水平衡的重要参数,其时空变化信息在气象预测、气候变化、水循环、地质勘探、农林监测和城市热环境等诸多领域具有广泛的应用。热红外遥感作为当前获取区域或全球尺度上地表温度和发射率的最有效手段之一,相较于传统的地面点位测量方法,具有空间覆盖范围大和重复观测等优势。对热红外遥感定量反演的地表温度与发射率产品进行地表真实性验证,有利于发现遥感数据自身或其反演算法的缺陷,确定产品的精度与不确定度,便于遥感产品的应用与推广。本文首先回顾了地表温度和发射率的定义,阐述了热红外遥感可反演、地面可测量的地表温度和发射率的科学内涵,并对利用热红外遥感数据反演地表温度和发射率的理论和方法作了概述;对地表温度和发射率地面验证的框架体系、验证指标进行总结,建立了基于精度、精确度、不确定度、完整性和稳定性的验证评价指标体系;总结了地表温度和地表发射率的地面验证方法、地面测量方法、辅助数据的获取方法、地表温度地面测量的采样方法,以及在验证异质非同温地表时从点到像元尺度的地表温度尺度转换方法等,分析了地面验证过程的主要误差来源;归纳了目前地表温度和地表发射率主要验证站点、观测网络及其空间分布特征;最后,本文讨论了地表温度与发射率地面验证存在的若干问题,并对地表温度与发射率验证工作的发展前景和趋势进行了相关展望。     

A radiance-based split-window algorithm for land surface temperature retrieval: Theory and application to MODIS data

The split-window algorithm is the most commonly used method for land surface temperature (LST) retrieval from satellite data. Simplification of the Planck’s function, as an important step in developing the SWA, allows us to directly relate the radiance to the temperature toward solving the radiative transfer equation (RTE) set. In this study, Planck’s radiance relationship between two adjacent thermal infrared channels was modeled to solve the RTE set instead of simplification of the Planck’s function. A radiance-based split-window algorithm (RBSWA) was developed and applied to Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) data. The performance of the RBSWA was assessed and compared with three most common brightness temperature-based split-window algorithms (BTBSWAs) by using the simulated data and satellite measurements. Simulation analysis showed that the LST retrieval using RBSWA had a Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 0.5 K and achieved an improvement of 0.3 K compared with three BTBSWAs, and the LST retrieval accuracy using RBSWA was better than 1.5 K considering uncertainties in input parameters based on the sensitivity analysis. For application of RBSWA to MODIS data, the results showed that: 1) comparison between LST from MODIS LST product and LST retrieved using RBSWA showed a mean RMSE of 1.33 K for 108 groups of MODIS image covering continental US, which indicates RBSWA is reliable and robust; 2) when using the measurements from US surface radiation budget network as real values the RMSE of the RBSWA algorithm was 2.55 K and was slightly better than MODIS LST product; and 3) through the cross validation using Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer LST product, the RMSE of the RBSWA algorithm was 2.23 K and was 0.28 K less than that of MODIS LST product. We conclude that the RBSWA for LST retrieval from MODIS data can attain a better accuracy than the BTBSWA.     

HJ-1B卫星热红外遥感影像农田地表温度反演

本文以我国自主研发的HJ-1B卫星影像为数据源,利用其热红外影像、基于JM&S普适性单通道算法反演2009年5月20日河北省涿州市和高碑店市的农田地表温度。最后将HJ-1B IRS影像的地表温度反演结果与同时相Landsat TM5影像的反演结果进行比较分析,分析结果表明:本文所提出的基于HJ-1B卫星热红外影像反演农田地表温度精度可靠,该方法是可行性的。     

Effects of prediction accuracy of the proportion of vegetation cover on land surface emissivity and temperature using the NDVI threshold method

Predicting land surface energy budgets requires precise information of land surface emissivity (LSE) and land surface temperature (LST). LST is one of the essential climate variables as well as an important parameter in the physics of land surface processes at local and global scales, while LSE is an indicator of the material composition. Despite the fact that there are numerous publications on methods and algorithms for computing LST and LSE using remotely sensed data, accurate prediction of these variables is still a challenging task. Among the existing approaches for calculating LSE and LST, particular attention has been paid to the normalised difference vegetation index threshold method (NDVI^THM), especially for agriculture and forest ecosystems. To apply NDVI^THM, knowledge of the proportion of vegetation cover (P_V) is essential. The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of the prediction accuracy of the P_V on the estimation of LSE and LST when using NDVI^THM. In August 2015, a field campaign was carried out in mixed temperate forest of the Bavarian Forest National Park, in southeastern Germany, coinciding with a Landsat-8 overpass. The P_V was measured in the field for 37 plots. Four different vegetation indices, as well as artificial neural network approaches, were used to estimate P_V and to compute LSE and LST. The results showed that the prediction accuracy of P_V improved using an artificial neural network (R²_CV = 0.64, RMSE_CV = 0.05) over classic vegetation indices (R²_CV = 0.42, RMSE_CV = 0.06). The results of this study also revealed that variation in the accuracy of the estimated P_V affected calculation results of the LSE. In addition, our findings revealed that, though LST depends on LSE, other parameters should also be taken into account when predicting LST, as more accurate LSE results did not increase the prediction accuracy of LST.     

针对Terra/MODIS数据的改进分裂窗地表温度反演算法

针对Terra/MODIS数据提出改进的分裂窗地表温度反演算法。充分考虑了传感器观测角度(VZA)的影响,并对地表和有效大气辐射按照不同的亮度温度区间分别进行Planck函数简化。利用TIGR3大气廓线库中的875条晴空大气廓线,ASTER波谱库中的106条地物发射率波谱,结合MODTRAN4大气辐射传输模型模拟得到分裂窗算法系数。利用MODTRAN4模拟数据对算法精度进行验证,结果表明本文的改进算法和原算法的均方根误差RMSE分别为0.34K和0.65K。敏感性分析表明,在中等湿润的大气条件下,算法对大气水汽含量并不敏感。该算法降低了传感器观测角度带来的地表温度反演误差。利用2009年6月美国SURFRAD辐射观测网6个站点的实测数据对改进算法、原算法以及MOD11_L2地表温度产品进行了对比验证,RMSE分别是0.93K、1.49K和1.0K,表明本文算法可以提高反演精度。     

基于ASTER GED产品的地表发射率估算

地表发射率是地表温度反演的重要输入参数,为了解决现有地表发射率估算方法在裸露地表精度较差的问题,本文基于最新的ASTER全球地表发射率产品(ASTER GED)和基于植被覆盖度的方法(VCM),提出了一个改进的地表发射率估算方法。首先,利用ASTER GED产品求解裸土发射率,然后,利用ASTER波谱库中的植被发射率和植被覆盖度结合VCM方法计算地表发射率。利用张掖地区2012年11景ASTER TES算法反演的地表发射率产品和实测地表发射率数据进行了验证,同时利用一景Landsat 8 TIRS数据分析了对地表温度反演精度的影响。结果表明该方法估算的地表发射率整体精度较高,可以有效改进裸露地表的发射率估算精度,用于支持利用多种热红外传感器数据生产高精度的地表温度产品。     

中国MODIS地表温度产品验证

分析了MODIS地表温度产品的误差来源，重点研究利用高分辨率遥感影像数据ASTER同步反演的验证方法。以2003年8月1日太 湖地区为例，用ASTER数据的反演结果与同时相的MODIS地表温度产品进行比较，分别在太湖水面、无锡城区及城郊农田3个典型地表 状况下选取感兴趣区域做线性拟合，取得了较好的结果，拟合的R2值可达0.966 6。