Operative and nonoperative management of blunt hepatic trauma in adults: a single-center report

Background/Purpose Liver trauma, especially that as result of road traffic accidents, still remains a complicated problem in severely injured patients. The aim of this study was to extract useful conclusions from the management in order to improve the final outcome of such patients. Methods Details for 86 patients with blunt hepatic trauma who were examined and treated in our department during a 6-year period were analyzed. We retrospectively reviewed the severity of liver injury, associated injuries, treatment, and outcome. Results Forty-nine liver injuries (57%) were of low severity (grades I and II), while 37 (43%) were of high severity (grades III, IV, and V). Liver trauma with associated injury of other organs was noted in 62 (72.1%) patients. Forty-three (50%) patients underwent an exploratory laparotomy within the first 24 h of admission. Thirty-five (71.4%) of the 49 patients with low-grade hepatic injuries were managed conservatively; no mortality occurred. Six (14%) of forty-three patients with liver trauma initially considered for conservative management required surgery due to hemodynamic instability. Five (13.5%) of 37 patients who were finally managed nonoperatively required adjunctive treatment for biloma, hematoma, or biliary leakage; no mortality occurred. The overall mortality rate was 9.3%; mortality rates of 5.8% and 3.5% were due to liver injuries and concomitant injuries, respectively. Conclusions Severe hepatic injuries require surgical intervention due to hemodynamic instability. Low-grade injuries can be managed nonoperatively with excellent results, while patients with hepatic trauma with associated organ injuries require surgery, because they continue to have significantly higher mortality.     

Nonoperative management of blunt liver trauma: the value of follow-up abdominal computed tomography scans

Our hypothesis was that follow-up abdominal CT scans are not routinely necessary in patients with blunt liver injury treated nonoperatively. We conducted an 8-year retrospective review of hospital chart and outpatient clinic records. We reviewed all admission and follow-up CT scans. There were 42 adults and 12 children. There were 1 (2%) grade I, 15 (28%) grade II, 28 (52%) grade III, 8 (15%) grade IV, and 2 (4%) grade V liver injuries. Two patients died during the first 24 hours, both from associated injuries. Nonoperative management was successful in 51 (98%) of the remaining 52 patients. No follow-up abdominal CT scans were performed on 21 (40%) patients; none developed hepatic complications. An initial follow-up CT scan was obtained in 31 (60%) patients. Information from these scans directly affected management in 3 (9%) patients; in each case, the scans were prompted by a change in clinical status. One significant biloma with bile leak was managed by nasobiliary stenting and percutaneous drainage. One hepatic artery-to-portal vein fistula was obliterated by transarterial embolization. A single missed diaphragm rupture necessitated laparotomy. Additional late follow-up CT scans were obtained in 13 patients; no clinically useful information was evident on any of these examinations. We conclude that follow-up abdominal CT scans are not routinely necessary in patients with liver injuries treated nonoperatively. Selective criteria based on the severity of liver injury, presence of associated intra-abdominal pathology, and clinical parameters should dictate the need for follow-up imaging studies.     

Selective management of blunt hepatic injuries including nonoperative management is a safe and effective strategy

BACKGROUND: The justification and preference for operative versus nonoperative management of hepatic injuries caused by blunt trauma remains ambiguous. This review assesses the outcome of operative and nonoperative management of liver injury after blunt trauma. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the demographics, severity of injury, severity of liver injury, associated concomitant injuries, management scheme, and outcome of patients with documented hepatic injury from 1993 to 2003. RESULTS: The overall mortality rate was 9.4%, with 3.7% caused by the liver injury itself. Fifty-nine percent (330 of 561) of liver injuries were of low severity (grades I and II), with an overall mortality rate of 6.6% caused by concomitant injuries and liver-related mortality of 0%. Forty-one percent (231 of 561) of liver injuries were high-severity injuries (grades III, IV, and V). Mortality for nonoperative management of high-severity liver injuries was 2.2%. If operative intervention was required because of hemodynamic instability or concomitant injuries then the mortality rate was significantly higher at 30%. Forty-two of the 378 (11%) liver injuries treated nonoperatively required an adjunctive procedure for successful management. CONCLUSIONS: Selective management of liver injuries presented a low liver-related mortality rate. Low-grade injuries can be managed nonoperatively with excellent results. High-grade injuries can be managed nonoperatively, if operative intervention is not required for hemodynamic instability or associated injuries, with a low mortality. In these patients, adjunctive procedures will be required selectively for successful nonoperative management of high-grade liver injuries. High-grade injuries requiring operative management because of hemodynamic instability or concomitant injuries continue to have significantly higher mortality.     

Pediatric blunt liver injury: establishment of criteria for appropriate management

There is no consensus regarding the most appropriate management of pediatric blunt liver injury. This study addresses this issue by reviewing our experience with blunt liver trauma in relationship to the grade of injury. Forty-one pediatric patients with blunt abdominal trauma and documented liver injury were managed from 1979 to 1989. Fifteen (37%) underwent celiotomy. Three children had extensive parenchymal injuries (grade IV or V) requiring resection and three others died intraoperatively, secondary to exsanguinating hemorrhage of associated injuries (grade V) to the hepatic veins and inferior vena cava. The need for celiotomy was obvious in these patients. In 9 of the 15 children who underwent exploration (60%), bleeding from the liver injury (grade II or III) had ceased by the time of celiotomy. These children did not appear to benefit from the operation. Twenty-six of the 41 patients (63%) were selected for nonoperative management because they were hemodynamically stable after initial resuscitation and did not show signs of associated intraabdominal injuries requiring surgical intervention. These children underwent evaluation by abdominal computed axial tomography scan (grade I, II, III, and IV injuries). Blood transfusions were given to keep the hematocrit above 30%. Seventeen of the 26 children managed nonoperatively (65%) did not require blood replacement. The mean (+/- SEM) transfusion volume for the remaining nine children was 14.8 +/- 2.5 mL/kg. Blunt liver injury represents a spectrum from a minimal parenchymal hematoma to massive liver disruption. We conclude that celiotomy is necessary for hepatic injury hemodynamically stable injured children with transfusion requirements less than 40 mL/kg can be managed nonoperatively in an appropriate setting.     

Comparison of hepatic abscess after operative and nonoperative management of isolated blunt liver trauma

Hepatic abscess has been well recognized as a complication after blunt hepatic injuries. The clinical presentation of hepatic abscess after the operative and nonoperative management of isolated blunt liver injury is compared in this study. From 1995 to 2000, 674 patients with blunt liver injury were admitted and were managed either operatively or nonoperatively. Hepatic abscess occurred in 21 of these patients. Six of the 21 patients had their liver injuries managed nonoperatively (group 1) and the remaining 15 had their liver injuries managed operatively (group 2). The severity of injury of both groups of patients was similar, but group 2 patients required more blood transfusion and had a higher incidence of abscess formation. The formation of abscess occurred within 12 days after admission in the group 1 patients but ranged from 5 days to 6 years in the group 2 patients. One of the group 1 and eight of the group 2 patients had recurrent abscesses and required repeated admission. The nonoperative management of blunt hepatic trauma had a better outcome than the operative approach in terms of a significant decrease in abdominal infections and tended to result in complete recovery without the need of repeated admission and drainage.     

Blunt hepatic trauma in children: experience with operative and nonoperative management

Between 1974 and 1982, 32 children were treated for blunt hepatic trauma. Twenty-three injuries were secondary to motor vehicle accidents. Twenty-three patients had associated injuries. The hepatic injury was treated surgically in 18 patients. Urgent surgery for massive bleeding was required in 7 patients; 8 underwent laparotomy for continued bleeding after initial stabilization; 2 underwent laparotomy for marked abdominal tenderness, and 1 for an expanding hepatic hematoma. Various excisional, debridement, suture, and drainage procedures were employed. Seven patients died, 5 from uncontrollable bleeding and 2 from associated severe head injury. The eleven survivors did well. The only postoperative complications were two wound infections. Fourteen patients were managed nonoperatively. Liver scan provided the diagnosis in all. Five of these patients required blood transfusion, and the mean volume of transfusion was 33cc/kg. The hospital courses in all cases were uneventful, and there were no late complications. A follow-up liver scan was obtained in 11 patients, showing resolution of the injury in all. We conclude that laparotomy is necessary for hepatic injury when it is associated with continuous massive bleeding. Hemodynamically stable patients can be managed nonoperatively, even when the blood-transfusion requirements are significant.     

Nonoperative management of blunt splenic and hepatic trauma in the pediatric population: significant differences between adult and pediatric surgeons?

Although operative management was the preferred method of treating blunt abdominal trauma in the past, recent literature and practice recommend a nonsurgical approach to most pediatric splenic and hepatic injuries. The majority of data supporting the safety and efficacy of this nonoperative approach are derived from university trauma programs with a pediatric center where care was managed by pediatric surgeons only. To evaluate the applicability of this approach in a regional trauma center where pediatric patients are managed by pediatric and non-pediatric surgeons we reviewed the experience at a Level II community trauma center. Fifty-four children (16 years of age or less) were admitted between April 1992 and April 1998 after sustaining blunt traumatic splenic and/or hepatic injuries. There were 37 (69%) males and 17 (31%) females; the average age was 11 years (range 4 months to 16 years). Of the 54 patients 34 (63%) sustained splenic injuries, 17 (31%) sustained hepatic injuries, and three (6%) sustained both splenic and hepatic injuries. All of these injuries were diagnosed by CT scan or during laparotomy. The average Injury Severity Score was 14.9 with a range from four to 57. Of the 47 patients initially admitted for nonoperative management one patient failed nonoperative management and required operative intervention. In our study 98 per cent (46 of 47 patients) of pediatric patients were successfully managed nonoperatively. Complications of nonoperative management occurred in two patients. Both developed splenic pseudocysts after splenic injury, which required later operative repair. These data are comparable with those from university trauma programs and confirm that nonoperative management is safe in a community trauma center. The majority of children with blunt splenic and hepatic trauma can be successfully treated without surgery, in a regional trauma center treated by nonpediatric trauma surgeons, if the decision is based on careful initial evaluation, aggressive resuscitation, and close observation of their hemodynamic stability.     

Functional outcome of nonoperatively managed renal injuries in children

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to define better the functional outcome of nonoperatively managed renal injuries in children. METHODS: All children who had blunt renal trauma managed nonoperatively were reviewed for injury grade, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, blood pressure, and percentage of function according to technetium-99m-dimercaptosuccinic acid renal scan after complete healing. RESULTS: Over a 2-year period, 17 children (mean age, 10.4 years) were managed conservatively for their renal injuries. There were two grade 2, two grade 3, nine grade 4, and four grade 5 injuries. Complete healing was documented in all cases within 3 months after injury. Renal scarring and volume loss were evident for all healed high-grade injuries (grades 4 to 5) at follow-up imaging. Technetium-99m-dimercaptosuccinic acid scanning demonstrated a decline in percentage of total renal function corresponding to injury severity (44.7 +/- 8.4% function for grades 2 and 3, 41.8 +/- 9.2% for grade 4 vs 29.5 +/- 7.9% for grade 5). Only two children (22%), however, with grade 4 injury had severe compromise of function (<30%). At the follow-up visit, all the children were asymptomatic and normotensive. None had abnormal BUN or creatinine (mean BUN, 10.5 +/- 5.1 mg/dL; mean creatinine, 0.6 +/- 0.2 mg/dL). CONCLUSIONS: The functional outcome for children with nonoperatively managed kidney injuries is good and correlates with injury grade. Children with grades 2 to 4 injuries managed conservatively retain near normal function. Those with grade 5 injuries have a loss of function attributable to scarring and parenchymal volume loss. Long-term follow-up evaluation of these children may be warranted.     

Nonoperative management of pediatric blunt hepatic trauma

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of operative versus nonoperative management of blunt hepatic trauma in children including transfusion practices. We reviewed the experience at our American College of Surgeons-verified Level I trauma center with pediatric commitment over a 5-year period. Children < or = 16 years of age suffering blunt liver injury as documented on admission CT scan were included in the study. Liver injuries identified on CT scan were classified according to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma's Organ Injury Scaling system. All data are presented as mean +/- standard error. One case of pediatric liver trauma not identified on CT was excluded (prehospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation). Twenty-seven patients were included [age 9.3 +/- 1.0 years (range 3-16)]. Mechanisms of injury included motor vehicle crash (14), pedestrian struck by motor vehicle (7), bicycle crash (4), fall from height (1), and pedestrian struck by falling object (1). Trauma Score was 11.5 +/- 0.3. Distribution of Liver Injury Grade was as follows: grade I, 13; grade II, 9; grade III, 3; grade IV, 2; and grade V, 0. All five patients who underwent operative management had multiple organ injuries; three had concomitant splenic injury requiring operative repair; the remaining two had small bowel injury requiring repair. Hepatorrhaphy did not correlate with severity of liver injury: grade I, n = 1; II, n = 2; III, n = 1; and IV, n = 1. Three operated patients received blood transfusions. Twenty-two patients were managed with nonoperative treatment, of these only one required blood transfusion. No patients in the study died, three were transferred to subacute rehabilitation, one was transferred to another hospital, and 23 were discharged home. Our findings indicate that a majority of children with blunt hepatic injury as documented on CT scan can be managed with nonoperative treatment, and few require blood transfusions. Patients with multiple organ injury including simultaneous splenic injury are likely ideally managed through operative exploration and repair, whereas those with isolated liver injuries can be successfully managed nonoperatively.     

Hazards of nonoperative therapy of hepatic injury in children

Several reports suggest that pediatric patients with stable liver injuries can be managed nonoperatively with few complications. From March 1978 to July 1983 seven children with hepatic injury were managed without surgery at CHNMC. Four children required greater than 50% total blood volume replacement, while the mean PRBC transfusion rate was 28 cc/kg. Eight major complications developed in five patients. Hospitalization averaged 23 days, without a mortality. This morbidity is greater than that described in earlier reports. In view of the limited cumulative clinical experience, we caution against routine nonoperative management of liver trauma in children until data with this new technique become available for analysis.     

Blood transfusion is an independent predictor of increased mortality in nonoperatively managed blunt hepatic and splenic injuries

BACKGROUND: Management strategies for blunt solid viscus injuries often include blood transfusion. However, transfusion has previously been identified as an independent predictor of mortality in unselected trauma admissions. We hypothesized that transfusion would adversely affect mortality and outcome in patients presenting with blunt hepatic and splenic injuries after controlling for injury severity and degree of shock. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed records from all adults with blunt hepatic and/or splenic injuries admitted to a Level I trauma center over a 4-year period. Demographics, physiologic variables, injury severity, and amount of blood transfused were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analysis with logistic and linear regression were used to identify predictors of mortality and outcome. RESULTS: One hundred forty-three (45%) of 316 patients presenting with blunt hepatic and/or splenic injuries received blood transfusion within the first 24 hours. Two hundred thirty patients (72.8%) were selected for nonoperative management, of whom 75 (33%) required transfusion in the first 24 hours. Transfusion was an independent predictor of mortality in all patients (odds ratio [OR], 4.75; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.37-16.4; p = 0.014) and in those managed nonoperatively (OR, 8.45; 95% CI, 1.95-36.53; p = 0.0043) after controlling for indices of shock and injury severity. The risk of death increased with each unit of packed red blood cells transfused (OR per unit, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.10-1.24; p < 0.0001). Blood transfusion was also an independent predictor of increased hospital length of stay (coefficient, 5.45; 95% CI, 1.64-9.25; p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Blood transfusion is a strong independent predictor of mortality and hospital length of stay in patients with blunt liver and spleen injuries after controlling for indices of shock and injury severity. Transfusion-associated mortality risk was highest in the subset of patients managed nonoperatively. Prospective examination of transfusion practices in treatment algorithms of blunt hepatic and splenic injuries is warranted.     

Diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of rectal trauma. Blunt versus penetrating

In the last 6 years, nine patients with blunt and 16 with penetrating rectal injuries were treated at University Hospital, Jacksonville, Florida. Blunt trauma was caused by vehicular accidents in seven patients and crush injuries in two. Penetrating rectal trauma was due to gunshot wounds in ten patients and foreign body insertion in six. All patients with blunt injury had bright red rectal bleeding, which led to diagnostic sigmoidoscopy. Rectal injury was identified at sigmoidoscopy in 12 patients who had penetrating wounds and at laparotomy in four patients. Thirteen patients who had penetrating rectal trauma had injury to only the rectum or to one additional organ. In contrast, all patients who had blunt rectal trauma had at least three associated injuries. In the penetrating group, 13 patients were treated by colostomy and mucus fistula; three patients with mucosal injury were managed nonoperatively. The only death occurred in a patient whose rectal injury was initially missed. Patients who had blunt rectal trauma were managed with colostomy and mucus fistula. Three patients died postoperatively, two of pelvic bleeding and one of head injury. Hemodynamic stabilization, colostomy and mucus fistula, presacral drainage, and rectal washout constitute proper treatment of patients with blunt or penetrating rectal trauma. Because of the greater number and severity of associated injuries, morbidity and mortality are higher after blunt rectal trauma.     

Nonoperative management of blunt hepatic and splenic injury in children.

OBJECTIVE: The authors assessed the risks of nonoperative management of solid visceral injuries in children (age range, 4 months-14 years) who were consecutively admitted to a level I pediatric trauma center during a 6-year period ending in 1991. METHOD: One hundred seventy-nine children (5.0%) sustained injury to the liver or spleen. Nineteen children (11.2%) died. Of the 160 children who survived, 4 received emergency laparotomies; 156 underwent diagnostic computer tomography and were managed nonoperatively. The percentage of children who were successfully treated nonoperatively was 97.4%. Delayed diagnosis of enteric perforations occurred in two children. Fifty-three children (34.0%) received transfusions (mean volume 16.7 mL/kg); however, transfusion rates during the latter half of the study decreased from 50% to 19% in children with hepatic injuries, despite increasing grade of injury, and decreased from 57% to 23% in the splenic group with similar injury grade (p < 0.005, chi square test and Student's t test). CONCLUSION: Pediatric blunt hepatic and splenic trauma is associated with significant mortality. Nonoperative management based on physiologic parameters, rather than on computed tomography grading of organ injury, was highly successful, with few missed injuries and a low transfusion rate.     

Contusions of the liver in adults. Initial non-operative management with computerized tomography follow-up is a reasonable therapeutic option. Report of 16 cases

Nonoperative management of blunt liver injury in adults still remains controversial. From February 1985 through September 1989, 27 patients were treated for blunt hepatic trauma: 11 required immediate operation and 16 (59%) were initially managed nonoperatively after evaluation of intraabdominal injury by computerized tomography. All of these 16 patients were hemodynamically stable and had no significant peritoneal signs. CT criteria for nonoperative management included subcapsular and intrahepatic hematoma, capsular tear or unilobar fracture, absence of large hemoperitoneum, absence of large devitalized liver and absence of other intraabdominal organ injuries. Clinical follow-up, repeated radiologic examinations and surgery confirmed the accuracy of CT. Only 2 patients required delayed operation (12.5%). Serial abdominal CT studies are an integral part of the conservative treatment of blunt hepatic injuries and showed complete resolution of hepatic injuries in the fourteen nonoperated patients in less than six months. No death and no delayed septic or biliary complications were noted. Mean hospital stay was seventeen days for all of the patients (multiple injuries or not) and only ten days for isolated blunt liver injury. These good results depend on identification of candidates for nonoperative management on strict clinical and CT criteria. Nonoperative management of adult blunt liver injury based on these findings is a useful alternative in a selected group of hemodynamically stable patients and decreases the rate of non-therapeutic coeliotomy.     

Severe blunt hepatic trauma in children.

BACKGROUND: Severe blunt hepatic injury in children is associated with a high mortality rate. Although nonoperative management has become the treatment of choice for mild to moderate liver trauma, there is no consensus as to the optimal treatment for the most severe hepatic injuries in children. METHODS: A statewide trauma registry was reviewed to identify children (age 18 years or less) treated for a severe blunt liver injury for the period 1993 to 1998. Only children with an American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grade V (AIS code 541828.5) liver injury were included. Database records were reviewed for demographic information, associated injuries, survival rate, length of stay (LOS), intensive care days (ICUD), and treatment rendered after resuscitation in the emergency department. RESULTS: Thirty children with a grade V liver injury were identified. The mean age was 11.2 years (range, 1 to 18), and the overall survival rate was 56%. Data for 5 patients were excluded (4 patients died in the emergency department, and 1 patient was transferred to another institution after arrival). Survivors had a trend toward a lower injury severity score (ISS) (36.1 v 44.6; P <.1) and a significantly higher Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), 12.5 v 6.6; P <.007). Patients with a decreased GCS had a lower overall survival rate (GCS < 8, 30% v GCS > 8, 76%). In the subset of 14 patients taken directly to the operating room, there was no difference between survivors (n = 6, 43%) and nonsurvivors (n = 8, 57%) in ISS (43 v 43; P value, not significant) or GCS (8.6 v 8.0; P value, not significant). Of the 11 patients treated nonoperatively, 10 (91%) survived with an average ISS of 33 and GCS of 13.8. Nonsurvivors more often had identified associated injuries to other abdominal and retroperitoneal organs. CONCLUSIONS: Severe hepatic injury is associated with a very high overall mortality rate in children. A low GCS is associated with a significant decrease in survival rate and may be the most important factor in outcome. Patients taken directly to the operating room have a slightly greater injury severity and a decreased survival rate compared with those treated nonoperatively. Thresholds and indications for laparotomy in these patients are not clear, and the need for operative management should be guided by the child's physiologic response to resuscitation. For those patients whose physiologic response to resuscitation permitted nonoperative management, a good outcome was achieved.     

Management of blunt splenic injury in patients with concurrent infectious mononucleosis

Selective nonoperative management is appropriate for most blunt splenic injuries in adults and children, but the efficacy of this approach is unknown when injury occurs in patients with concurrent infectious mononucleosis. We have reviewed our experience during the past 23 years with the selective nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury in these patients. Medical record review identified nine patients with blunt splenic injury and infectious mononucleosis from 1978 to 2001, representing 3.3 per cent of our total trauma population with blunt splenic injury treated during that interval. Two patients underwent immediate splenectomy because of hemodynamic instability. Seven patients were admitted with the intent to treat nonoperatively. Five patients were successfully managed nonoperatively. Two patients failed nonoperative management and underwent splenectomy, one because of hemodynamic instability and one because of an infected splenic hematoma. Concurrent infectious mononucleosis does not preclude the successful nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury. This small subset of patients may be managed nonoperatively using the same criteria as for patients whose splenic injuries are not complicated by infectious mononucleosis.     

Nonsurgical management of solid abdominal organ injury in patients over 55 years of age

Age greater than 55 is often stated to be a contraindication to nonoperative management of intraperitoneal solid organ injury, based upon failures in early experiences of nonoperative therapy. Refinements in the criteria for nonoperative management of hepatic and splenic injuries have yielded improved success rates compared with those in initial reports, raising questions as to the validity of an age-related contraindication. A retrospective chart review of patients more than 55 years of age sustaining blunt hepatic and/or splenic injury at two urban Level I trauma centers was performed. Patients were stratified into three groups in which selection criteria could not consistently be determined: those managed nonoperatively, those managed operatively, and those who died within 24 hours. The purpose of this review is to identify whether age is a determinant for nonoperative management of abdominal solid organ injury. Eighty-eight patients were identified (mean age, 68.7 +/- 9.8), 17 of whom died in the emergency department or after operative intervention. Of the remaining 71 patients, 37 were originally managed nonoperatively (mean age 69.9 +/- 9.1, mean Injury Severity Score 19.9), 24 sustained hepatic injuries (grades I-IV), 12 sustained splenic injuries (grades I-III), and one patient sustained both organ injuries. Three patients with multisystem trauma died from complications unrelated to their solid organ injury (one brain death, one septic death, and one respiratory arrest). A single patient, with a grade I liver injury, required delayed exploration (for a persistent, unexplained metabolic acidosis) and underwent a nontherapeutic celiotomy. All but one of the 37 patients were successfully treated nonoperatively, for a 97 per cent success rate. We conclude that hemodynamically stable patients more than 55 years of age sustaining intra-abdominal injury can be observed safely. Age alone should no longer be considered an exclusion criterion for nonoperative management of intra-abdominal solid organ injury.     

Injuries associated with pediatric liver trauma

Injury remains the leading cause of childhood mortality for children younger than 14 years of age, with the liver being particularly susceptible to blunt trauma in children. This study reviews the authors' institutions' experience with pediatric liver injuries in an attempt to establish current patterns of injury, management and outcomes. A single-center, retrospective review was conducted of 105 consecutive pediatric patients who presented with a traumatic liver injury from January 1996 through February 2004. Average patient age was 13.1+/-4.9 years and 58 per cent were male. Perihospital mortality was 8.6 per cent, with 67 per cent of mortality being attributed to head injury. The majority of patients were managed nonoperatively (81%). Liver injury was most often grade II (35%) by CT scan. Liver injury grade did not affect survival, but did affect injury management, with grade I and grade IV liver injuries more likely to be managed surgically (P < 0.001). Grade I liver injuries were associated with concomitant spleen injuries, whereas grade IV injuries were associated with pancreatic injuries. Surgical management was associated with a higher injury severity score (P = 0.005), higher mortality (P = 0.01), and with other associated injuries as well. Children experiencing blunt abdominal trauma are at risk of significant morbidity and mortality; however, these risks stem more likely from associated injuries than injury to the liver proper. Clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion for potentially catastrophic associated injuries to the pancreas with high-grade liver injury.     

Nonoperative management of blunt hepatic trauma in adults

Although well accepted in pediatric patients, nonoperative management of blunt hepatic trauma in adults remains controversial. From January 1981 through May 1987, 66 adults were identified with blunt hepatic trauma that had been confirmed by abdominal exploration or abdominal computed tomography (CT): 46 underwent immediate operation, and 20 were initially managed nonoperatively. Patients were considered for nonoperative management only if they were hemodynamically stable and had no significant peritoneal irritation. CT criteria for nonoperative management included contained subcapsular or intrahepatic hematoma, unilobar fracture, absence of devitalized liver, minimal intraperitoneal blood, and absence of other significant intra-abdominal organ injuries. The predominant CT pattern in the 17 patients successfully managed nonoperatively included unilobar right-lobe fracture or intrahepatic hematoma. A small amount of blood in either gutter or in the pelvis did not portend failure of nonoperative management. No delayed complications were noted during an average follow-up of 27 months. Nonoperative management of blunt hepatic injury based on abdominal CT findings is a useful alternative in a select group of hemodynamically stable patients.     

Evolution in the treatment of complex blunt liver injuries

Over the last decade, major changes in the treatment of patients with blunt liver injuries have occurred, specifically with the nonoperative treatment of more complex injuries. These major changes can be summarized as follows: 1. Patients with blunt liver injuries are screened expeditiously by surgeon-performed ultrasonography. Depending on the initial findings and response to resuscitation, further decisions are made regarding the further evaluation. 2. Computed tomographic scanning is the mainstay of diagnosis for hepatic injuries after blunt trauma; the initial CT findings will help the trauma surgeon to determine the nonoperative treatment. 3. Liver injuries of grades I through III can be observed safely in a monitored unit and not necessarily in an ICU setting. Patients with injuries of grades IV and V are best initially observed in an ICU. 4. More than two thirds of patients with injuries of grades IV and V can be treated nonoperatively. However, 50% of these patients will require some type of interventional treatment, but not necessarily a laparotomy. 5. Initial findings on the CT scan can help to identify those patients who will need some type of interventional treatment and to identify associated injuries. 6. Elderly patients or patients with associated medical comorbidities can also be treated nonoperatively if strict guidelines are followed. 7. Complications in patients with complex blunt liver injuries are not uncommon. However, most of the complications can be safely treated by less invasive procedures.