手术治疗慢性踝关节外侧不稳106例

目的探讨慢性踝关节外侧不稳继发病损及其有效的手术方法。方法 本组行手术解剖重建外踝韧带治疗慢性踝关节外侧不稳的患者106例,观察其继发病损在关节镜下的表现。结果 对本组患者随访12～111个月,平均31.2个月,术后所有踝关节均达到功能稳定,关节活动度基本恢复正常,没有复发性踝关节不稳发生。运用美国AOFAS足踝评分系统对患者手术前后踝关节功能进行评估,术前与术后AOFAS后足评分间的差异有统计学意义。结论 解剖重建距腓前韧带、跟腓韧带,有效地矫正了踝关节外侧不稳定和距下关节不稳定,是治疗踝关节慢性前外侧严重不稳定的合理而有效的治疗方法。     

应用带线锚钉治疗慢性踝关节前外侧不稳疗效观察

目的 探讨应用带线锚钉治疗慢性踝关节外侧不稳的临床疗效.方法 应用强生Fastin RC带线锚钉治疗慢性踝关节外侧不稳42例,并运用关节镜诊治关节内继发病损.结果 术后39例获随访13～27个月,平均(18.5±5.2)个月,术后所有踝关节活动度基本恢复正常.术前与术后AOFAS后足评分有差异有显著统计学意义(P＜0.01).结论 应用带线锚钉解剖重建距腓前韧带、跟腓韧带,有效地矫正了踝关节外侧不稳,手术方法合理而有效.     

外侧副韧带重建结合关节镜下治疗慢性踝关节外侧不稳体会

目的评价外侧副韧带重建结合踝关节镜探查清理治疗慢性外踝不稳的临床疗效。方法自2008年9月～2012年2月,对15例慢性踝关节外侧不稳患者行腓骨短肌腱外侧韧带重建合结合踝关节镜探查清理治疗。患者年龄17.0～59.0岁,平均31.5岁,术前病程5.0～37.0个月,平均13.0个月。所有患者既往均有踝关节外侧副韧带不同程度损伤史,术前影像学提示分别不同程度合并有关节滑膜增生、骨赘,前、后踝撞击症,关节软骨损伤等。手术先行踝关节镜探查、清理,外踝下弧形小切口取部分腓骨短肌腱重建外侧副韧带。结果 13例得到随访,患者术后随访3.0～25.0个月,平均13.6个月。美国足踝外科(AOFAS)踝-后足功能评分,术前43～71分,平均(50.2±2.5)分;术后79～93分,平均(86.9±4.1)分。且随访期间未发现踝关节不稳复发或其他并发症。结论外侧副韧带重建结合踝关节镜探查、清理是治疗慢性踝关节外侧不稳的一种安全、有效方法。     

改良Brostrom术式治疗慢性踝关节外侧不稳21例疗效分析

目的 评价改良Brostrom修复外侧副韧带治疗慢性踝关节外侧不稳的疗效.方法 采用改良Brostrom术式治疗慢性踝关节外侧不稳21例,术后行踝关节MRI检查、活动度检查并按美国足踝矫形外科协会踝-后足功能评分表(AOFAS)进行功能评分.结果 本组随访11个月～5年,所有患者恢复了关节稳定性.采用AOFAS踝-后足...     

踝关节外侧结构重建治疗踝关节外侧不稳

目的：探讨踝关节外侧结构重建在治疗慢性踝关节外侧不稳中的作用。方法：回顾分析2005年7月至2008年1月收治的13例慢性踝关节不稳患者,男10例,女3例;年龄24～45岁,平均33岁。13例均采用自体半束腓骨短肌腱解剖重建距腓前韧带和跟腓韧带（Sammarco法）,手术前后按踝关节评分系统进行评分,评分项目包括稳定性、疼痛、活动能力、X线表现。结果：13例均获随访,时间6～32个月,平均16.4个月,患者踝关节评分在稳定性、疼痛、活动能力等方面均有所改善,踝关节评分由术前的平均（43.54±7.04）分提高至术后的（73.38±4.17）分,手术前后差异有统计学意义（P〈0.01）。全部患者对手术表示满意。结论：采用半束自体腓骨短肌腱解剖重建距腓前韧带及跟腓韧带的方法治疗踝关节外侧不稳,操作便利,对于以关节不稳为主要表现的患者,疗效确切。     

踝关节慢性前外侧不稳的手术治疗

目的: 探讨治疗踝关节慢性前外侧不稳定 (踝关节外侧不稳定合并距下关节不稳定) 的合理而有效的手术方式。方法: 自 1999 ~2003年, 应用Chrisman Snook术式, 以腓骨短肌腱前半部分重建距腓前韧带、跟腓韧带和距跟外侧韧带,治疗踝关节慢性前外侧不稳 8例患者,共 13例关节。结果: 术后随诊 6个月~5年, 平均 19个月。术后所有踝关节均达到功能稳定, 关节活动度基本恢复正常, 没有复发性踝关节不稳发生。以Good评级标准作为疗效评价, 10例关节 (77% ) 为优, 2例关节 (15% ) 为良, 1例关节为中 (7% ), 优良率达 92%。结论: Chrisman Snook术式重建了距腓前韧带、跟腓韧带和距跟外侧韧带, 有效地矫正了踝关节外侧不稳定和距下关节不稳定, 是治疗踝关节慢性前外侧严重不稳定的合理而有效的治疗方法。     

自体半腱肌重建外侧副韧带治疗慢性踝关节外侧不稳的疗效分析

目的 :探讨采用自体半腱肌重建外侧副韧带治疗慢性踝关节外侧不稳的临床疗效。方法 :回顾性分析2014年9月至2016年11月采用自体半腱肌肌腱重建踝关节外侧副韧带治疗28例踝关节外侧不稳患者的临床资料,其中男20例,女8例;平均年龄28.6岁(18~47岁)。记录围术期并发症,并采用美国足踝外科协会(American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society,AOFAS)踝关节评分标准评价术后功能改善情况,采用视觉模拟标尺法(Visual analogue scale,VAS)评估患者术后疼痛情况。结果 :28例患者均获得随访,时间6~28个月,平均18.2个月。围术期未出现医源性骨折及切口感染等严重手术并发症。末次随访时未出现踝关节不稳或踝关节活动受限,未出现膝部肌腱供区肌肉功能障碍。AOFAS评分由术前的53.1±6.8提高至术后的90.4±5.9,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。VAS评分由术前的6.3±1.7提高至术后的0.8±0.5,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:采用自体半腱肌解剖重建踝关节外侧副韧带手术方式简便,术后恢复好,无严重并发症,临床疗效好,是治疗慢性踝关节外侧不稳的可靠方法之一。     

带线锚钉结合改良Brostr(o)m法修复慢性踝关节外侧不稳

目的 探讨带线锚钉结合改良Brostr(o)m法修复慢性踝关节外侧不稳的方法和疗效.方法 对2009年5月至2011年5月间收治16例慢性踝关节不稳患者进行回顾性分析,其中男7例,女9例;年龄19 ～31岁,平均23.6岁;均有踝关节外侧轻度肿胀、疼痛、不稳感,均为6个月以上的陈旧性损伤,而且经过3～6个月康复训练无改善,反复扭伤.均采用带线锚钉技术结合改良Brostr(o)m法修复,采用美国足踝外科协会(AOFAS)的踝与后足评分系统对手术前、后踝关节功能进行评估,并采用Good 症状评级标准对患者术后主观感觉进行评估. 结果 所有患者术后获6～ 24个月(平均16个月)随访.术后AOFAS踝与后足评分[(92.06±3.13)分]、距骨前移距离[(3.19±1.17) mm]、距骨倾斜角度(4.69°±1.35°)均较术前[(65.00±6.65)分、(11.38±2.23) mm、13.44°±2.25°]明显改善,差异均有统计学意义(P＜0.05).术后Good症状评级标准:Ⅰ级8例,Ⅱ级6例,Ⅲ级2例,优良率为87.5％.结论 在慢性踝关节外侧不稳中应用带线锚钉结合改良Brostr(o)m法解剖修复韧带可以达到理想的效果.     

慢性踝关节外侧不稳患者采用全关节镜下Brostrom-Gould术治疗临床疗效观察

目的探讨全关节镜下Brostrom-Gould术治疗慢性踝关节外侧不稳患者临床效果。方法随机选取70例慢性踝关节外侧不稳患者行全关节镜下Brostrom-Gould术治疗患者进行研究,比较术前、术后3月、术后1年疼痛程度、踝关节功能,记录术后并发症。结果患者术后3个月、术后1年疼痛程度评分明显低于术前,且术后1年疼痛程度评分明显低于术后3个月,P0.05。患者术后3个月、术后1年时AOFAS评分明显高于术后(47.2±8.1)分,且术后1年时AOFAS评分(92.6±6.3)分,明显高于术后3个月(65.8±5.2)分,t=27.44,P=0.00。术后2例切口感染,经积极处理和治疗后治愈。结论全关节镜下Brostrom-Gould术治疗慢性踝关节外侧不稳患者疗效显著,可有助于缓解患者术后疼痛,改善其踝关节功能。     

部分自体腓骨长肌腱解剖重建踝外侧副韧带

[目的]分析部分自体腓骨长肌腱解剖重建踝外侧副韧带治疗慢性外侧踝关节不稳的疗效.[方法]回顾性分析2019年1月-2021年4月行部分自体腓骨长肌腱进行解剖重建治疗的慢性外侧踝关节不稳19例患者的临床资料.记录围手术期、随访与影像资料.[结果]所有患者均顺利完成手术,手术时间(100.42±18.15)min,术中出血...     

Revision total knee arthroplasty with the Total Condylar III system in inflammatory arthritis

We report a consecutive series of 16 revision total knee arthroplasties using the Total Condylar III system in 14 patients with inflammatory arthritis which were performed between 1994 and 2000. There were 11 women and three men with a mean age of 59 years (36 to 78). The patients were followed up for 74 months (44 to 122). The mean pre-operative Knee Society score of 37 points (0 to 77) improved to 88 (61 to 100) at follow-up (t-test, p < 0.001) indicating very good overall results. The mean range of flexion improved from 62 degrees (0 degrees to 120 degrees) to 98 degrees (0 degrees to 145 degrees) (t-test, p < 0.05) allowing the patients to stand from a sitting position. The mean Knee Society pain score improved from 22 (10 to 45) to 44 (20 to 50) (t-test, p < 0.05). No knee had definite loosening, although five showed asymptomatic radiolucent lines. Complications were seen in three cases, comprising patellar pain, patellar fracture and infection. These results suggest that the Total Condylar III system can be used successfully in revision total knee arthroplasty in inflammatory arthritis.     

结构性植骨修复膝关节翻修术中严重骨缺损的临床效果及相关分析

目的探讨同种异体结构性植骨在膝关节翻修术中大块骨缺损中应用的临床效果和意义。方法1994～2001年芬兰坦佩雷大学医院应用单一翻修假体及同种异体骨结构性植骨治疗膝关节置换术大块骨缺损患者10例（膝）,男1例,女9例,平均年龄70岁（61—77岁）,平均随访5年（1～8年）,所有手术均由两名高年资专科医师执行,采取KSS评分评估术前术后膝关节功能。结果最后随访时,患者膝关节KSS评分由术前的平均39分（4～51分）提高至81分（28—102分;P〈0．05）;疼痛评分由术前的18分（0—30分）提高至42分（10—50分;P〈0．05）。2例出现假体周围透亮线（〈1mm）,但没有任何松动症状;所有结构性植骨均获得满意的愈合,最后随访时没有出现吸收征象,1例患者术后出现膝前疼痛,经髌骨表面置换后症状消失。结论同种异体骨结构性植骨应用在膝关节翻修术中大块骨缺损中可取得满意的临床效果,重建下肢力线、第三代骨水泥技术的应用及有由专科医师实施手术是获得良好临床效果的保证。     

骨性关节炎和炎症性关节炎行全膝关节置换翻修术临床效果的比较及相关分析

目的对应用单一翻修假体系统行膝关节置换翻修术的骨性关节炎与炎症性关节炎的临床材料进行汇总分析、对比。方法1994至2000年间,共69例患者71膝在芬兰坦配雷大学医学院医院应用翻修假体TCⅢ行全膝关节置换翻修术。56膝为女性,16膝为男性,平均年龄69．1岁（36～85岁）,平均随访时间为5.9年（3．0—10．2年）;16膝为炎症性关节炎,55膝为骨性关节炎,初次手术和翻修术的时间间隔平均为6．8年。临床评估参照KSS评分系统,再次翻修、截肢和死亡视为随访终止。结果所有患者术后1年和最终随访时的膝关节总评分、功能评分、活动范围、疼痛评分、行走评分及上楼评分等与术前相比差异有统计学意义（P〈0．001）。尽管23例假体周围有无症状性骨吸收线,但是关节均无明显结构上的松脱。并发症包括4例术后感染,1例髌骨疼痛综合症,1例髌腱断裂。以再次翻修作为终点,假体5年生存率为95％,8年生存率为94％。最终随访时,骨性关节炎患者的各项数据比炎症性关节炎患者稍好,但统计学分析结果示两组之间的差异无统计学意义。结论尽管炎症性关节炎会导致患者韧带松弛,容易感染,骨质破坏,一般情况较差,但是其行全膝关节置换翻修术的疗效与骨关节炎相接近。     

Revision total knee arthroplasty with the Total Condylar III system: A comparative analysis of 71 consecutive cases of osteoarthritis or inflammatory arthritis

Background?As revision total knee arthroplasty surgery is becoming more common, it is necessary to evaluate how individual revision prosthesis systems perform in degenerative and inflammatory arthritides. In this study, results of the use of the Total Condylar III (TC III) system in osteoarthritis (55 knees) were compared to results of its use in inflammatory arthritis (16).

Methods?Patients were followed radiographically for 5.9 (3.0–10.2) years and clinically for 3.0 (0.2–6.8) years, using re-revision as the endpoint.

Results?At 1 year after revision and at final follow-up, the total Knee Society knee score, function score and range of motion had improved (p?<?0.001) with no differences between osteoarthritis and inflammatory arthritis. No knee had definite component loosening, although 23 knees had asymptomatic radiolucent lines. Complications comprised 4 infections, 1 patellar pain syndrome and 1 rupture of the patellar tendon. Using any re-revi-sion of the prosthesis as the endpoint, 5-year survival was 95% and 8-year survival was 94%.

Interpretation?Concentration of demanding revision knee arthroplasties to a few hands led to good or excellent knee joint knee score results in four-fifths of the patients, and showed good outcome with the TCIII system. In spite of ligamentous laxity, propensity to develop infections, bone destruction and poor general health, patients with inflammatory arthritis had results similar to those with osteoarthritis.     

Revision total knee arthroplasty with the total condylar III system: a comparative analysis of 71 consecutive cases of osteoarthritis or inflammatory arthritis

BACKGROUND: As revision total knee arthroplasty surgery is becoming more common, it is necessary to evaluate how individual revision prosthesis systems perform in degenerative and inflammatory arthritides. In this study, results of the use of the Total Condylar III (TC III) system in osteoarthritis (55 knees) were compared to results of its use in inflammatory arthritis (16). METHODS: Patients were followed radiographically for 5.9 (3.0-10.2) years and clinically for 3.0 (0.2-6.8) years, using re-revision as the endpoint. RESULTS: At 1 year after revision and at final follow-up, the total Knee Society knee score, function score and range of motion had improved (p < 0.001) with no differences between osteoarthritis and inflammatory arthritis. No knee had definite component loosening, although 23 knees had asymptomatic radiolucent lines. Complications comprised 4 infections, 1 patellar pain syndrome and 1 rupture of the patellar tendon. Using any re-revision of the prosthesis as the endpoint, 5-year survival was 95% and 8-year survival was 94%. INTERPRETATION: Concentration of demanding revision knee arthroplasties to a few hands led to good or excellent knee joint knee score results in four-fifths of the patients, and showed good outcome with the TCIII system. In spite of ligamentous laxity, propensity to develop infections, bone destruction and poor general health, patients with inflammatory arthritis had results similar to those with osteoarthritis.     

髌骨周围电灼去神经化对保留髌骨的全膝关节置换术膝前痛的Meta分析

目的 以Meta分析方法研究髌骨周围电灼去神经化对保留髌骨的全膝关节置换术（TKA）膝前痛和膝关节功能的影响.方法 检索关于保留髌骨行髌骨周围电灼去神经化TKA的相关文献,按照特定的纳入和排除标准筛选文献并提取相关数据,用Review Manager 5.0软件进行Meta 分析.结果共纳入四篇随机对照研究.分析表明髌骨周围电灼去神经化对保留髌骨的TKA患者术后膝前痛的发生率无影响[RR=0.76,95%CI （0.59,1.00）,P=0.05],但是可以改善其的Feller髌骨评分[MD=1.15,95%CI （0.74,1.55）,P〈0.01],KSS评分系统-膝关节评分[MD=1.30,95%CI （0.23,2.37）,P〈0.05]和KSS评分系统-膝关节功能评分[MD=1.45,95%CI （0.08,2.81）,P〈0.05].结论 在保留髌骨的全膝关节置换术中使用髌骨边缘电灼去神经化能改善术后膝前痛和膝关节功能.     

Total condylar knee arthroplasty. 16- to 21-year results.

This study presents long term results of arthroplasty with posterior cruciate retention using the Total Condylar Knee implant. From 1976 to 1982, 139 patients had 159 knee arthroplasties using Total Condylar Knee prostheses. Sixty-three patients (72 knees) were available for followup at a minimum of 16 years (range, 16-21 years). The average age of the patients at the time of surgery was 61 years. There were 21 men and 42 women. Patients with 68 knees had osteoarthrosis, three had rheumatoid arthritis and one had posttraumatic arthritis. There were five delayed complications. One patient (one knee) underwent revision surgery and two patients (two knees) declined revision surgery because they were considered to be high surgical risks, as determined by their internists. The average preoperative score was 40.3 points and improved to 88.4 points at followup. Eighty-seven percent of the patients had a score equal to or more than 85 points at last evaluation. Prosthesis survivorship at 20 years was 98.6% for patients who had revision surgery. No femoral components were revised for aseptic loosening. Retention of the posterior cruciate in Total Condylar Knee prosthesis produces results comparable with the results of the original Total Condylar Knee prosthesis with cruciate sacrifice.     

膝关节骨关节炎患者初次全膝关节置换术中选择髌骨置换的Meta分析

目的探讨膝关节骨关节炎(OA)进行初次全膝关节置换术(TKA)中选择髌骨置换与否的疗效,评价两种不同治疗选择的差异。方法检索Medline、Embase、Cochranelibrary、CBM,收集膝关节OA行初次TKA术中髌骨置换与否的临床对照试验,提取数据分析,采用RevMan5.0.18进行Meta分析。结果纳入8个前瞻性随机对照试验,共822例手术,其中髌骨置换组373例,髌骨非置换组444例。髌骨置换与非置换组比较,前膝痛与KSS评分均无明显的统计学意义(P0.5),置换组的因髌股关节问题而再次手术率低于非置换组[RR=0.53,95%CI(0.29,0.96),P=0.04],但置换组再次手术的原因除了常见的前膝痛,还包括髌骨假体相关的并发症。结论膝关节OA的患者行初次TKA术中选择髌骨置换与否的前膝痛与KSS评分无明显的统计学意义,置换组的因髌股关节问题再次手术率低于非置换组,但置换组再次手术的复杂性大于非置换组。     

初次膝关节表面置换术近中期的疗效分析

目的评估初次膝关节表面置换术的早中期疗效,分析主要并发症发生的原因和预防方法。方法回顾分析自2000年1月~2007年12月,本组接受初次膝关节表面置换术的140例176膝,获得随访的患者129例160膝,平均随访时间为(35±8)个月(16~98个月)。术前和随访时对患膝进行KSS和HSS评分,关节活动度检查,所得数据采用SPSS 17.0统计学软件进行统计学分析。结果术后膝关节感染4例(2.5%),其中2例为术后5~6年出现感染,与患者不恰当的局部注射治疗有关。膝关节关节僵硬(活动度小于75°)11例((6.8%),深静脉血栓形成1例(0.8%),假体无菌性松动1例(0.6%)。随访时膝关节表面置换术后HSS及KSS评分均较术前显著提高,优良多达90%以上。膝关节活动度从术前的(87.7±27.7)°提高至术后的(108.8±21.9)°(t=2.272,P0.01)。结论初次膝关节表面置换术对于消除膝关节疼痛,改善关节的活动功能效果明显,术后早中期的并发症发生率低。     

Lateral patellofemoral impingement: a cause of treatable pain after TKA

Multiple etiologies may cause anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty. While prior studies have addressed component positioning and surgical technique, no series in the literature describes lateral patellofemoral impingement as a source of the pain. Over a 2-year period at our institution, 18 patients with 19 painful total knee arthroplasties were diagnosed with lateral patellofemoral impingement. All underwent revision surgery with either lateral facetectomy or revision of the patellar dome. These patients were followed with Knee Society scores for 1 year. Knee Society scores were significantly improved at 8 weeks, 16 weeks, and 1 year. Lateral patellofemoral impingement should always be considered in the differential diagnosis of the painful total knee arthroplasty. This should be evaluated clinically through direct palpation of the lateral facet, and radiographically with the sunrise view. Lateral facetectomy or patellar revision can be performed with predictably good clinical results.