Frequency of cytochrome P 450 3A4 variant genotype in transplant population and lack of association with cyclosporin clearance

Objective: Cytochrome P ₄₅₀ 3A4 (CYP3A4) plays a vital role in the oxidative metabolism of many xenobiotics. Some recent reports have provided circumstantial evidence in support of an association between a genetic polymorphism (A→G) in the 5′-flanking region (−290) of CYP3A4 and altered enzyme activity. We sought to determine whether genotyping patients for CYP3A4-G could assist with the dose optimisation of drugs metabolised by this system. Methods: Normal subjects and renal-transplant patients receiving cyclosporin for immune modulation were genotyped for the CYP3A4-G variant. A surrogate for cyclosporin clearance was estimated from the ratio of the cyclosporin dose, normalised for body weight and the corresponding trough concentration. The association between genotype and clearance was examined in patients who received twice-daily doses of cyclosporin and who were not on concurrent medication known to modify CYP3A4 function. Results: The allelic frequencies of the CYP3A4-G variant were estimated to be 2.6% and 3% in transplant patients and normal subjects, respectively. The median cyclosporin pseudo-clearance of transplant patients with wild-type CYP3A4 was 0.90 l/h/kg (range: 0.35–3.8 l/h/kg; n=86), whereas the corresponding value for the five patients heterozygotic for the CYP3A4-G variant was 0.71 l/h/kg (range 0.35–0.91 l/h/kg). The distribution of the pseudo-clearance according to genotype was not found to be significant according to a Fisher's exact test (P=0.15). Conclusion: Genotyping for the CYP3A4-G polymorphism is unlikely to assist cyclosporin dose selection in transplant patients. Received: 16 February 1999 / Accepted in revised form: 26 April 2000     

Pharmacokinetic interaction between mefloquine and ritonavir in healthy volunteers

AIMS: To evaluate the pharmacokinetic interaction between ritonavir and mefloquine. METHODS: Healthy volunteers participated in two separate, nonfasted, three-treatment, three-period, longitudinal pharmacokinetic studies. Study 1 (12 completed): ritonavir 200 mg twice daily for 7 days, 7 day washout, mefloquine 250 mg once daily for 3 days then once weekly for 4 weeks, ritonavir restarted for 7 days simultaneously with the last mefloquine dose. Study 2 (11 completed): ritonavir 200 mg single dose, mefloquine 250 mg once daily for 3 days then once weekly for 2 weeks, ritonavir single dose repeated 2 days after the last mefloquine dose. Erythromycin breath test (ERMBT) was administered with and without drug treatments in study 2. RESULTS: Study 1: Ritonavir caused less than 7% changes with high precision (90% CIs: -12% to 11%) in overall plasma exposure (AUC(0,168 h)) and peak concentration (Cmax) of mefloquine, its two enantiomers, and carboxylic acid metabolite, and in the metabolite/mefloquine and enantiomeric AUC ratios. Mefloquine significantly decreased steady-state ritonavir plasma AUC(0,12 h) by 31%, Cmax by 36%, and predose levels by 43%, and did not affect ritonavir binding to plasma proteins. Study 2: Mefloquine did not alter single-dose ritonavir pharmacokinetics. Less than 8% changes in AUC and Cmax were observed with high variability (90%CIs: -26% to 45%). Mefloquine had no effect on the ERMBT whereas ritonavir decreased activity by 98%. CONCLUSIONS: Ritonavir minimally affected mefloquine pharmacokinetics despite strong inhibition of CYP3A4 activity from a single 200 mg dose. Mefloquine had variable effects on ritonavir pharmacokinetics that were not explained by hepatic CYP3A4 activity or ritonavir protein binding.     

Inhibition of oral midazolam clearance by boosting doses of ritonavir,and by 4,4-dimethyl-benziso-(2H)-selenazine (ALT-2074), an experimental catalytic mimic of glutathione oxidase

AIMS

We evaluated whether ‘boosting’ doses of ritonavir can serve as a positive control inhibitor for pharmacokinetic drug–drug interaction studies involving cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A). The study also determined whether 4,4-dimethyl-benziso-(2H)-selenazine (ALT-2074), an investigational organoselenium compound that acts as a catalytic mimic of glutathione oxidase, inhibits CYP3A metabolism in vivo.

METHODS

Thirteen healthy volunteers received single 3-mg oral doses of midazolam on three occasions: in the control condition, during co-treatment with low-dose ritonavir (three oral doses of 100 mg over 24 h), and during co-treatment with ALT-2074 (three oral doses of 80 mg over 24 h).

RESULTS

Ritonavir increased mean (±SE) total area under the curve (AUC) for midazolam by a factor of 28.4 ± 4.2 (P < 0.001), and reduced oral clearance to 4.2 ± 0.5% of control (P < 0.001). In contrast, ALT-2074 increased midazolam AUC by 1.25 ± 0.11 (P < 0.05), and reduced oral clearance to 88 ± 8% of control.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose ritonavir produces extensive CYP3A inhibition exceeding that of ketoconazole (typically 10- to 15-fold midazolam AUC enhancement), and is a suitable positive control index inhibitor for drug–drug interaction studies. ALT-2074 inhibits CYP3A metabolism to a small degree that is of uncertain clinical importance.     

肝移植患者他克莫司血药浓度与细胞色素P450 3A5 1*3基因多态性的关系

目的研究细胞色素P450 3A5 1*3基因多态性对肝移植患者他克莫司(免疫抑制剂)血药浓度的影响,探讨他克莫司在不同个体间吸收、代谢差异的基因背景。方法观察150例肝移植术后常规使用他克莫司 吗替麦考酚酯胶囊 醋酸泼尼松三联免疫抑制治疗的成年患者,分别测定术后1、3、6个月和12月的他克莫司全血药浓度,采用等位基因特异PCR测定细胞色素P450 3A5 1*3基因多态性,比较不同基因型之间他克莫司的浓度/剂量比的差异。结果在口服相同剂量的他克莫司时,1个月内CYP3A5 1*1、CYP3A5 1*3和CYP3A5 3*3三种基因型的浓度/剂量比,差异不显著;但3个月后,差异显著;6个月和12个月的浓度/剂量比,差异非常显著。结论CYP3A5 1*3多态性与肝移植患者他克莫司血药浓度具有非常显著的相关性,携带等位基因1*1和1*3患者的血药浓度明显低于3*3纯合子患者。     

Evidence of an interaction between nifedipine and nafcillin in humans

AIMS: Nafcillin (Wyeth Laboratories, Philadelphia, PA, USA) has been reported to induce the metabolism of cyclosporin and warfarin, which are known substrates of cytochrome P-450 (CYP). However, there has not been any report to date on its possible interaction with nifedipine, an index substrate of the enzyme, CYP3A4. METHODS: Nine healthy normotensive subjects participated in this randomized placebo-controlled two-way crossover study examining the effects of 5 days' pretreatment of nafcillin 500 mg or placebo four times daily on the pharmacokinetics of an oral dose of nifedipine 10 mg. Plasma nifedipine concentrations were measured by gas chromatography-mass spectro. RESULTS: The area under the plasma nifedipine concentration-time curve (AUC0-alpha) in nafcillin-pretreated subjects (80.9 +/- 32.9 micro g l-1 h-1) was significantly decreased compared with subjects who received only nifedipine (216.4 +/- 93.2 micro g l-1 h-1) (P < 0.001). Total plasma clearance of nifedipine (CL/F) was significantly increased with nafcillin pretreatment (138.5 +/- 42.0 l h-1 vs 56.5 +/- 32.0 l h-1) (P < 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The results show that nafcillin pretreatment markedly increased the clearance of nifedipine and suggest that nafcillin is a potent inducer of CYP enzyme.     

Pharmacokinetic interaction between cyclosporin and diltiazem

Summary Previous reports have indicated that administration of the calcium antagonist diltiazem results in major changes in the pharmacokinetics of cyclosporin A (CyA). A new clinical trial was undertaken in 22 renal transplant patients receiving a constant dose of cyclosporin to further explore this interaction. Coadministration of diltiazem for one week produced an increase in the blood concentration of CyA and its metabolites 17 and 18 in almost all patients, but no increase in CyA metabolites 1 and 21. The mean whole blood CyA trough level determined by HPLC rose from 117 ng·ml^–1 to 170 ng·ml^–1 after one week on diltiazem, and the mean trough level of metabolite 17 rose similarly from 184 ng·ml^–1 before to 336 ng·ml^–1.Based on experiments with microsomes from human liver the effect of diltiazem was due to noncompetitve inhibition of CyA-metabolism by diltiazem, and the increased concentration of metabolite 17 might have been due to stronger inhibition of its secondary metabolism steps.     

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions of morin and cyclosporin

Morin is a flavonoid present in mulberry and herbs. We have reported that morin exerted anti-inflammatory activity on the activated macrophages. Cyclosporin (CsA) is a potent immunosuppressive agent with narrow therapeutic range, which is widely used for the treatments of autoimmune diseases and transplantation rejection. This study aimed to measure the effects of morin on the disposition of CsA in lymphoid and non-lymphoid tissues, and on the functions of immune cells in mice. CsA (Neoral, 10 mg/kg) was orally administered with and without a concomitant dose of morin (0, 50, 100, 200 mg/kg) to mice once daily for 2 weeks. CsA concentrations in blood, liver, kidney, and spleen were determined by a specific monoclonal fluorescence polarization immunoassay. The decreased levels of CsA in tissues were found well correlated to increased doses of morin. The coadministration of 200 mg/kg morin significantly decreased CsA in blood, liver, kidney, and spleen by 33%, 17%, 38%, and 45%, respectively. On the other hand, coadministration of morin decreased dramatically the nitric oxide production by the activated macrophages when compared to CsA treatment alone. Moreover, morin maintained the level of CsA-suppressed T helper 1 (Th1) type cytokine, although the CsA concentration in spleen was markedly reduced. In conclusion, morin coadministration profoundly reduced CsA concentration but did not significantly alter the CsA-suppressed Th1 immune response in mice.     

Lack of drug interaction between omeprazole, lansoprazole, pantoprazole and theophylline

AIMS: Theophylline is a model substrate of cytochrome P4501A2. The ability of the proton pump inhibitors (PPI) omeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole to induce cytochrome P4501A2 has not yet been unequivocally resolved. The aim of this comprehensive study was to compare directly the effect of the three PPI on the absorption and disposition of theophylline. METHODS: Twenty healthy, nonsmoking, male and female volunteers (extensive metabolisers of cytochrome P4502C19 and Helicobacter pylori negative) participated in a randomized, double-blind, four-period, placebo-controlled crossover study. In each of the four periods they received either omeprazole (40 mg), lansoprazole (60 mg), pantoprazole (80 mg) or placebo once daily for 10 days. Sustained release theophylline (350 mg twice daily) was coadministered from day 8-10. Pharmacokinetics of theophylline as well as of all three PPI were determined at steady-state (day 10). RESULTS: In all periods, point estimates and 90% confidence intervals of the area under the concentration-time curves (AUC), maximum steady-state concentrations and peak-trough fluctuations of theophylline were not altered by PPI pretreatment and met the required limits for bioequivalence. Point estimates (90% confidence intervals) of the AUC ratios of theophylline plus PPI to theophylline alone were 0.92 (0.87-0.97), 0.90 (0.85-0.95) and 1.00 (0.95-1.06) for omeprazole, lansoprazole and pantoprazole, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant intake of omeprazole, lansoprazole or pantoprazole at high therapeutic doses does not affect the absorption and disposition of theophylline.     

Mirtazapine and paroxetine: a drug-drug interaction study in healthy subjects

Paroxetine inhibits cytochrome P(450) 2D6, which is involved in the metabolism of mirtazapine. The possible drug-drug interaction between two pharmacologically distinct antidepressants, mirtazapine and paroxetine, has been investigated in a randomized, three-way crossover study in 24 healthy male and female subjects. After a titration phase of 3 days, each subject received single daily doses of 30 mg mirtazapine, 40 mg paroxetine or the combination for 6 days. Assessments included serial blood sampling for pharmacokinetics at steady state, cognitive testing using the test battery of CDR Ltd, a visual analogue mood rating scale (Bond and Lader) and the Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire. Paroxetine inhibits the metabolism of mirtazapine, as shown by increases of approximately 17% and 25% of the 24 h AUC's of mirtazapine and its demethyl metabolite, respectively. Mirtazapine did not alter the pharmacokinetics of paroxetine. The combined administration of mirtazapine and paroxetine probably does not alter cognitive functioning or result in major changes on the visual analogue mood rating scale and Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire, compared with the administration of either drug alone. The incidence of adverse events was lower during combined administration of mirtazapine and paroxetine than during administration of either drug alone. Fatigue, dizziness, headache, nausea, anxiety and somnolence were the most common adverse events during combined administration. These data suggest that the combination of mirtazapine and paroxetine is unlikely to lead to clinically relevant drug-drug interactions and can be used without dose adjustment of either drug. The combination may even be better tolerated than either drug alone. Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

In vitro metabolism of indiplon and an assessment of its drug interaction potential

This study was designed to study the in vitro metabolism of indiplon, a novel hypnotic agent, and to assess its potential to cause drug interactions. In incubations with pooled human liver microsomes, indiplon was converted to two major, pharmacologically inactive metabolites, N-desmethyl-indiplon and N-desacetyl-indiplon. The N-deacetylation reaction did not require NADPH, and appeared to be catalyzed by organophosphate-sensitive microsomal carboxylesterases. The N-demethylation of indiplon was catalyzed by CYP3A4/5 based on the following observations: (1) the sample-to-sample variation in N-demethylation of indiplon ([S]?=?100?µM) in a bank of human liver microsomes was strongly correlated with testosterone 6β-hydroxylase (CYP3A4/5) activity (r²?=?0.98), but not with any other CYP enzyme; (2) recombinant CYP1A1, CYP1A2, CYP3A4, CYP3A5 and CYP3A7 had the ability to catalyze this reaction; (3) the N-demethylation of indiplon was inhibited by CYP3A4/5 inhibitors (ketoconazole and troleandomycin), but not by a CYP1A2 inhibitor (furafylline). In pooled human liver microsomes, indiplon exhibited a weak capacity to inhibit CYP1A2, CYP2A6, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2D6, CYP2E1, CYP3A4/5 and carboxylesterase (p-nitrophenylacetate hydrolysis) activities (IC50?≥?20?µM). Clinical data available on indiplon support the conclusions of this paper that the in vitro metabolism of indiplon is catalyzed by multiple enzymes, and indiplon is a weak inhibitor of human CYP enzymes.     

Effect of voriconazole on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of zolpidem in healthy subjects

AIMS: To assess the effect of voriconazole on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of zolpidem. METHODS: In a randomized cross-over study with two phases, 10 healthy subjects ingested 10 mg of zolpidem with or without oral voriconazole pretreatment. The concentrations of zolpidem were measured in plasma up to 24 h and pharmacodynamic variables were monitored for 12 h. RESULTS: Voriconazole increased the peak plasma concentration of zolpidem by 1.23-fold [P < 0.05; 90% confidence interval (CI) 1.05, 1.45] and the area under the plasma zolpidem concentration-time curve by 1.48-fold (P < 0.001; 90% CI 1.29, 1.74). The time to peak plasma zolpidem concentration was unchanged by voriconazole but the half-life was prolonged from 3.2 to 4.1 h (P < 0.01; 95% CI on the difference 0.27, 1.45). The pharmacodynamics of zolpidem were unaffected by voriconazole. CONCLUSION: Voriconazole caused a moderate increase in exposure to zolpidem in healthy young subjects but no clear pharmacodynamic changes were observed between the groups.     

细胞色素P450系统与蛋白酶抑制剂的药物相互作用

简述了细胞色素P450（CYP）系统的同工酶命名、异构体类型和基因多态性表达，并介绍了酶抑制剂和酶诱导剂的动力学特性。阐述了蛋白酶抑制剂沙奎那韦、茚地那韦、利托那韦与其他经CYP代谢的药物合用时出现的药物相互作用。     

Interrelationship Between Substrates and Inhibitors of Human CYP3A and P-Glycoprotein

Purpose. CYP3A and P-gp both function to reduce the intracellular concentration of drug substrates, one by metabolism and the other by transmembrane efflux. Moreover, it has been serendipitously noted that the two proteins have many common substrates and inhibitors. In order to test this notion more fully, systematic studies were undertaken to determine the P-gp-mediated transport and inhibitory characteristics of prototypical CYP substrates. Methods. L-MDR1, LLC-PK1, and Caco-2 cells were used to evaluate established CYP substrates as potential P-gp substrates and inhibitors in vitro, and mdrla deficient mice were used to assess the in vivo relevance of P-gp-mediated transport. Results. Some (terfenadine, erythromycin and lovastatin) but not all (nifedipine and midazolam) CYP3A substrates were found to be P-gp substrates. Except for debrisoquine, none of the prototypical substrates of other common human CYP isoforms were transported by P-gp. Studies in mdrla disrupted mice confirmed that erythromycin was a P-gp substrate but the CYP3A inhibitor ketoconazole was not. In addition, CYP3A substrates and inhibitors varied widely in their ability to inhibit the P-gp-mediated transport of digoxin. Conclusions. These results indicate that the overlap in substrate specificities of CYP3A and P-gp appears to be fortuitous rather than indicative of a more fundamental relationship.     

植物成分与细胞色素P450相互作用的研究进展

细胞色素P450（CYP450）是体内参与药物代谢的重要酶系,其活性在受到诱导或抑制后将干扰药物的作用。植物成分普遍存在于食物与药物中,与CYP450的相互作用将产生广泛影响。总结近年来植物成分与细胞色素P450的7个亚型CYP1A2、CYP2A6、CYP2C9、CYP2C19、CYP2D6、CYP2E1、CYP3A4相互作用的研究结果,为临床上合理用药提供参考。     

植物成分与细胞色素P450相互作用的研究进展

细胞色素P450（CYP450）是体内参与药物代谢的重要酶系,其活性在受到诱导或抑制后将干扰药物的作用。植物成分普遍存在于食物与药物中,与CYP450的相互作用将产生广泛影响。总结近年来植物成分与细胞色素P450的7个亚型CYP1A2、CYP2A6、CYP2C9、CYP2C19、CYP2D6、CYP2E1、CYP3A4相互作用的研究结果,为临床上合理用药提供参考。     

肠道CYP3A和P-gp:口服药物的吸收屏障

细胞色素P4 5 0 3A (CYP3A)亚族是人类药物代谢最重要的I相酶。由Mdr1基因编码的外向转运载体蛋白P糖蛋白 (P gp)为药物外排泵。这两种蛋白质在口服药物吸收的主要部位胃肠道均有高表达 ,同时二者的底物具有显著的重叠性。近来 ,大量研究表明 ,决定口服药物生物利用度的主要因素是肠道细胞CYP3A对已吸收药物的生物转化作用和肠道细胞中P gp对已吸收药物的主动外排作用。如果药物为CYP3A和 (或 )P gp的底物 ,当其与CYP3A和P gp的抑制剂同时服用后 ,药物的口服生物利用度将可能升高     

Evaluation of pharmacokinetic interaction between cyclosporin A and probucol in rats

Purpose. The purpose of this study was to clarify the mechanism of pharmacokinetic interaction between cyclosporin A and probucol in clinical cases. Methods. The whole blood concentration of cyclosporin A was measured after oral administration of cyclosporin A with or without probucol in rats. Cyclosporin A was administered as three types of solutions: the contents of the conventional formulation (Sandimmun® capsule) diluted with corn oil and the contents of the new microemulsion preconcentrate formulation (Neoral® capsule) diluted with saline or corn oil. The solubility of cyclosporin A and another lipophilic agent tacrolimus in water with or without probucol was also measured. Results. The area under the blood concentration-time curve (AUC) after the administration of Sandimmun® (corn oil) and Neoral® (corn oil) was significantly decreased to 26% and 41% of the control by coadministration of probucol. However in the case of Neoral® (saline), it was unchanged. The terminal elimination rate constant was not affected by probucol in any type of cyclosporin A solution. The solubility of cyclosporin A or tacrolimus in water dropped to 49% or 16% of the respective control in the presence of probucol. Conclusion. The interaction between cyclosporin A and probucol is caused by the decreased absorption of cyclosporin A partly based on the lowered solubility in the presence of probucol.