Nitrate Reductase Assay for Rapid Detection of Isoniazid,Rifampin, Ethambutol,and Streptomycin Resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Colorimetric phenotypic tests recently gained interest because traditional primary drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates takes a long time. We used meta-analysis techniques to review the reliability and accuracy of the nitrate reductase assay (NRA), which is one of the most popular colorimetric methods to detect resistance to first-line drugs. Medline, PubMed, ISI Web, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were used to search for studies enrolled in the meta-analysis. The analysis included 35 studies for isoniazid (INH), 38 for rifampin (RIF), and 22 for ethambutol (EMB) and streptomycin (STR). Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were applied to summarize diagnostic accuracy. The meta-analyses were performed by the use of Meta-DiSc software (version 1.4) and were focused on sensitivity and specificity values for measurements of accuracy. The pooled sensitivities were 96% for INH, 97% for RIF, 90% for EMB, and 82% for STR. The pooled specificities for INH, RIF, EMB, and STR were 99%, 100%, 98%, and 96%, respectively. The times required to obtain results were between 5 and 28 days by the direct NRA and between 5 and 14 days by the indirect test. In conclusion, the present meta-analysis showed that the NRA is a reliable low-cost rapid colorimetric susceptibility test that can be used for the detection of multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis, including detection of EMB resistance. However, the test appears to have a relatively low sensitivity for STR and needs further improvement.     

The use of E-test for the drug susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis – A solution or an illusion?

Aim: To evaluate E-test as a tool for rapid determination of drug susceptibility against the conventional LJ method focusing on reliability, expense, ease of standardization and performance of the technique in low resource settings. Materials and Methods: A total of 74 clinical isolates (2004-2005) of Mycobacterium tuberculosis were tested using E-test for susceptibility to streptomycin (STM), isoniazid (INH), rifampicin (RIF) and ethambutol (EMB) by E-strip and LJ (LJPM) proportion methods. Results: The LJPM method, the gold standard, detected resistance against STM in 16.2%, INH in 40.5%, RIF in 18.9% and EMB in 27% cases. In comparison, the resistance values showed by E-test was 66.67% for STM, 57.14% for INH 71.43% for RIF and 80% for EMB. The susceptible correlation was 90.32% for STM, 73.91% for INH, 93.33% for RIF and 59.26% for EMB. E-test correctly identified only eight of the 12 (66.6%) MDR isolates and wrongly identified four isolates which were not MDR. The overall agreement between the two methods was only 48.6%. Resistant isolates showed false positive resistance observed while using E-strip towards all the drugs. Conclusion: E-strips are not quite feasible as a replacement for LJ-proportion method on a large scale due to high risk of cross contamination, laboratory infection, expense associated with it and high false positive resistance observed to all first line drugs. However, the good correlation observed for RIF between the two methods indicates that E-test could contribute to the role in rapid screening of MDR TB isolates as rifampicin mutations are invariably observed in MDR TB isolates.     

Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex in pulmonary and extrapulmonary samples with the FluoroType MTBDR assay

ObjectivesRifampicin (RIF) and isoniazid (INH) are the two most effective first-line antibiotic drugs for the treatment of tuberculosis (TB). The new FluoroType MTBDR (FT-MTBDR) real-time PCR is intended to detect INH and RIF resistance mutations as a second step following a primary Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) PCR. Here we evaluate the feasibility of the FT-MTBDR assay to detect simultaneously MTBC-specific DNA as well as to detect potential INH and RIF resistance through analysing inhA promotor, katG and rpoB sequences in one PCR reaction.MethodsWe analysed 3885 consecutive primary samples with FT-MTBDR and compared the results with microscopy and culture: 978 were from sputum, 2007 from other respiratory tract locations plus gastric lavages, and 875 from extrapulmonary locations, respectively.ResultsOverall, 176 samples were MTBC culture positive and 139 FT-MTBDR positive, providing a FT-MTBDR sensitivity of 0.714 (95% confidence interval 0.640–0.779) and specificity of 0.996 (0.994–0.998), respectively. For the 978 sputum, 96 were MTBC culture positive and 89 FT-MTBDR positive, sensitivity 0.854 (0.764–0.915) and specificity 0.992 (0.983–0.997). Of the 139 MTBC positive, 99 (71%) had interpretable genotypic resistance results for at least one drug, 92 (66%) for both drugs.DiscussionThe ability of FT-MTBDR to detect MTBC is adequate with the significant added feature of simultaneous genotypic resistance detection of both INH and RIF in a single PCR reaction.     

Concordance between Molecular and Phenotypic Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex Isolates for Resistance to Rifampin and Isoniazid in the United States

Multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) are defined by resistance to at least rifampin (RMP) and isoniazid (INH). Rapid and accurate detection of multidrug resistance is essential for effective treatment and interruption of disease transmission of tuberculosis (TB). Overdiagnosis of MDR TB may result in treatment with second-line drugs that are more costly, less effective, and more poorly tolerated than first-line drugs. CDC offers rapid confirmation of MDR TB by the molecular detection of drug resistance (MDDR) for mutations associated with resistance to RMP and INH along with analysis for resistance to other first-line and second-line drugs. Simultaneously, CDC does growth-based phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST) by the indirect agar proportion method for a panel of first-line and second-line antituberculosis drugs. We reviewed discordance between molecular and phenotypic DST for INH and RMP for 285 isolates submitted as MTBC to CDC from September 2009 to February 2011. We compared CDC''s results with those from the submitting public health laboratories (PHL). Concordances between molecular and phenotypic testing at CDC were 97.4% for RMP and 92.5% for INH resistance. Concordances between CDC''s molecular testing and PHL DST results were 93.9% for RMP and 90.0% for INH. Overall concordance between CDC molecular and PHL DST results was 91.7% for RMP and INH collectively. Discordance was primarily attributable to the absence of known INH resistance mutations in isolates found to be INH resistant by DST and detection of mutations associated with low-level RMP resistance in isolates that were RMP susceptible by phenotypic DST. Both molecular and phenotypic test results should be considered for the diagnosis of MDR TB.     

Discordance across Several Methods for Drug Susceptibility Testing of Drug-Resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isolates in a Single Laboratory

Given the increases in drug-resistant tuberculosis, laboratory capacities for drug susceptibility testing are being scaled up worldwide. A laboratory must decide among several endorsed methodologies. We evaluated 87 Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates for concordance of susceptibility results across six methods: the L-J proportion method, MGIT 960 SIRE AST, Gene/Xpert MTB/RIF, GenoType MTBDRplus line probe assay, MycoTB MIC plate, and a laboratory-developed mycobacteriophage quantitative PCR (qPCR)-based method. Most (80%) isolates were multidrug resistant. Of the culture-based methods, the mycobacteriophage qPCR method was fastest, the L-J proportion method was the slowest, and the MGIT method required the most repeat testing (P < 0.05). For isoniazid (INH), 82% of isolates were susceptible by all methods or resistant by all methods, whereas for rifampin (RIF), ethambutol (EMB), and streptomycin (STR), such complete concordance was observed in 77%, 50%, and 51% of isolates, respectively (P < 0.05 for INH or RIF versus EMB or STR). The discrepancies of EMB and STR stemmed largely from diminished concordance of the MGIT EMB results (kappa coefficient range, 0.26 to 0.30) and the L-J STR result (kappa range, 0.35 to 0.45) versus other methods. Phage qPCR and the MycoTB MIC plate were the only methods that yielded second-line susceptibilities and revealed significant quantitative correlations for all drugs except cycloserine, as well as moderate to excellent kappa coefficients for all drugs except for para-aminosalicylic acid. In summary, the performance of M. tuberculosis susceptibility testing differs by platform and by drug. Laboratories should carefully consider these factors before choosing one methodology, particularly in settings where EMB and STR results are clinically important.     

Mutations at embB306 codon and their association with multidrug resistant M. tuberculosis clinical isolates

Purpose: The presence of embB306 mutation in ethambutol (EMB)-susceptible (EMBs) clinical isolates questions the significance of these mutations in conferring resistance to EMB. The present study was carried out to determine the occurrence of embB306 mutation in EMB-resistant (EMBr) and EMBs strains of M. tuberculosis. One hundred and four multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) strains were also included to establish the relevance of excessive use of rifampicin (RIF) and isoniazid (INH) in occurrence of embB306 mutations in EMBs M. tuberculosis isolates. Materials and Methods: Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) from M. tuberculosis clinical strains was isolated by cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) method. Phenotypic and genotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST) was performed on 354 M. tuberculosis isolates by using standard proportion method and multiplex-allele-specific polymerase chain reaction assay, respectively. Results: The overall frequency of embB306 mutations in EMBr isolates was found to be five times higher than its occurrence in EMB-susceptible isolates (50% vs 10%). Further, the association between embB306 mutation and EMB-resistance was observed to be statistically significant (P = 0.000). Conclusion: The embB306 is not only the main causative mutation of EMB resistance, but is a sensitive applicant marker for EMB-resistance study.     

Susceptibility of M. tuberculosis to antituberculosis drugs as determined by two methods, in Sucre state, Venezuela

The objective of this study was to evaluate the resistance to isoniazid (INH), rifampicin (RIF), streptomycin (STR) and ethambutol (EMB), with the Canetti's proportions method (PM) and the nitrate reductase assay (NRA) of 59 clinical strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, isolated in the period of august 2005 to december 2006, in Sucre state, Venezuela. Primary and acquired drug resistance was 6.3% and 14.3%, respectively. Only one strain was found to be multidrug resistant (MDR). The overall agreement between the NRA and PM was 100% for INH, RIF and EMB, and 96% for STR. The time to obtain results was 10 to 14 days for the NRA, compared to 42 days for the PM. The NRA was easy to perform and therefore represents a useful tool for rapid and accurate determination of drug-resistant M. tuberculosis. The sequence of the rpoB gene of the RIF resistant strain demonstrated a never described mutation (change in the codon 456; TCG > CAG) in the hypervariable region of 81 base pairs where most of the mutations of the RIF resistant strains have been reported. Comparison of our results with those of the last resistance prevalence study carried out in the years 1998-1999, shows a decrease in the studied area.     

Evaluation of Agar-Based Medium with Sheep Sera for Testing of Drug Susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to Isoniazid,Rifampin, Ethambutol,and Streptomycin

The performance of sheep sera instead of sheep blood in agar-based media was investigated for susceptibility testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis against primary drugs. The levels of agreement between agar-based medium supplemented with sheep sera and the proportion method on Middlebrook 7H11 agar as the reference method for determining susceptibility to isoniazid (INH), rifampin (RIF), ethambutol (EMB), and streptomycin (STR) were 98.4, 98.4, 95.3, and 100%, respectively.     

Performance of the Genotype® MTBDRPlus assay in the diagnosis of tuberculosis and drug resistance in Samara, Russian Federation

Background

Russia is a high tuberculosis (TB) burden country with a high prevalence of multidrug resistant tuberculosis (MDRTB). Molecular assays for detection of MDRTB on clinical specimens are not widely available in Russia.

Results

We performed an evaluation of the GenoType^® MTBDRplus assay (HAIN Lifescience GmbH, Germany) on a total of 168 sputum specimens from individual patients at a public health laboratory in Central Russia, as a model of a middle income site in a region with high levels of drug resistance. Phenotypic drug resistance tests (DST) were performed on cultures derived from the same sputum specimens using the BACTEC 960 liquid media system. Interpretable GenoType^® MTBDRplus results were obtained for 154(91.7%) specimens with readability rates significantly higher in sputum specimens graded 2+ and 3+ compared to 1+ (RR = 1.17 95%CI 1.04–1.32). The sensitivity and specificity of the assay for the detection of rifampicin (RIF) and isoniazid (INH) resistance and MDR was 96.2%, 97.4%, 97.1% and 90.7%, 83.3%, 88.9% respectively. Mutations in codon 531 of the rpoB gene and codon 315 of the katG gene dominated in RIF and INH resistant strains respectively. Disagreements between phenotypical and molecular tests results (12 samples) could be explained by the presence of rare mutations in strains circulating in Russia and simultaneous presence of resistant and sensitive bacilli in sputum specimens (heteroresistance).

Conclusion

High sensitivity, short turnaround times and the potential for screening large numbers of specimens rapidly, make the GenoType^® MTBDRplus assay suitable as a first-line screening assay for drug resistant TB.     

Characterisation of rpsL, rrs and embB mutations associated with streptomycin and ethambutol resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis

In order to characterise molecular mechanisms of first-line drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis and to evaluate the use of molecular markers of resistance (gene point mutations), we analysed 66 multi-drug-resistant (MDR) isolates from Latvian tuberculosis patients. They were all resistant to rifampin (RIF), isoniazid (INH) and streptomycin (SM), and 33 were resistant to ethambutol (EMB). Enzymatic digestion by MboII and nucleotide sequencing of the rpsL gene fragment detected a single nucleotide substitution K43R in 40 (61%) of the 66 SM-resistant M. tuberculosis isolates. Of the other 26 SM-resistant isolates, 16 (24%) had mutations at positions 513A-->C and 516C-->T of the rrs gene and 10 (15%) had the wild-type sequence. The single-stranded DNA conformation polymorphism (SSCP) method was used to detect mutations in the embB gene associated with EMB resistance. Substitutions in the embB gene were found by SSCP analysis in 15 (45%) and by sequencing in 17 (52%) of the 33 EMB-resistant isolates. Surprisingly, SSCP revealed a nucleotide mutation at codon M306 in five (15%) of 33 in vitro EMB-susceptible MDR isolates.     

The reliability of rifampicin resistance as a proxy for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review of studies from Iran

In Iran, patients showing rifampicin (RIF) resistance detected by the Xpert® MTB/RIF assay are considered as candidates for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) treatment. Despite the fact that RIF resistance has been used as a proxy for MDR-TB, little is known about the proportion of isoniazid (INH) resistance patterns in RIF-resistant TB. We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase, and other databases up to March 2017 for studies addressing the proportion of INH resistance patterns in RIF-resistant TB in Iran. The data were pooled using a random effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran’s Q and I² statistics. A total of 11 articles met the eligibility criteria. Data analysis demonstrated that 33.3% of RIF-resistant isolates from new TB cases and 14.8% of RIF-resistant isolates from previously treated cases did not display resistance to INH. The relatively high proportion of INH susceptibility among isolates with RIF resistance indicated that RIF resistance may no longer predict MDR-TB in Iran. Therefore, the detection of RIF resistance by the Xpert MTB/RIF assay will require complementary detection of INH resistance by other drug susceptibility testing (DST) methods in order to establish the diagnosis of MDR-TB.     

Predicting Extensively Drug-Resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis Phenotypes with Genetic Mutations

Molecular diagnostic methods based on the detection of mutations conferring drug resistance are promising technologies for rapidly detecting multidrug-/extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (M/XDR TB), but large studies of mutations as markers of resistance are rare. The Global Consortium for Drug-Resistant TB Diagnostics analyzed 417 Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from multinational sites with a high prevalence of drug resistance to determine the sensitivities and specificities of mutations associated with M/XDR TB to inform the development of rapid diagnostic methods. We collected M/XDR TB isolates from regions of high TB burden in India, Moldova, the Philippines, and South Africa. The isolates underwent standardized phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST) to isoniazid (INH), rifampin (RIF), moxifloxacin (MOX), ofloxacin (OFX), amikacin (AMK), kanamycin (KAN), and capreomycin (CAP) using MGIT 960 and WHO-recommended critical concentrations. Eight genes (katG, inhA, rpoB, gyrA, gyrB, rrs, eis, and tlyA) were sequenced using Sanger sequencing. Three hundred seventy isolates were INH^r, 356 were RIF^r, 292 were MOX^r/OFX^r, 230 were AMK^r, 219 were CAP^r, and 286 were KAN^r. Four single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in katG/inhA had a combined sensitivity of 96% and specificities of 97 to 100% for the detection of INH^r. Eleven SNPs in rpoB had a combined sensitivity of 98% for RIF^r. Eight SNPs in gyrA codons 88 to 94 had sensitivities of 90% for MOX^r/OFX^r. The rrs 1401/1484 SNPs had 89 to 90% sensitivity for detecting AMK^r/CAP^r but 71% sensitivity for KAN^r. Adding eis promoter SNPs increased the sensitivity to 93% for detecting AMK^r and to 91% for detecting KAN^r. Approximately 30 SNPs in six genes predicted clinically relevant XDR-TB phenotypes with 90 to 98% sensitivity and almost 100% specificity.     

Evaluation of Genotype MTBDRplus Line Probe Assay in Detection of Rifampicin and Isoniazid Resistance in Comparison to Solid Culture Drug Susceptibility Testing in a Tertiary Care Centre of Western Uttar Pradesh

Background: Isoniazid (INH) and rifampicin (Rif) are the key first-line antituberculosis drugs, and resistance to these drugs i.e., multi-drug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB), is likely to result in treatment failure and poor clinical outcomes. India has the highest burden of TB and MDR-TB in the world, disproportionately high even for India’s population. The GenoType® MTBDRplus molecular method allows rapid detection of Rif and INH resistance. Aim: The present study was done to compare the performance of line probe assay test (GenoType® MTBDRplus) with solid culture method for an early diagnosis of MDR-TB. Methods: Totally 1503 sputum samples of MDR-TB suspects were subjected to fluorescent microscopy. Decontamination was done by N-acetyl-L-cysteine and sodium hydroxide method. Fluorescent microscopy-positive samples were subjected to GenoType® MTBDRplus (HAIN Lifescience) assay. Sixty-two random samples were compared with phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST) (1% proportion method) using solid culture method by Lowenstein–Jensen media. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for detection of resistance to Rif were 94.74%, 95.35%, 90% and 97.62% and to INH were 92.00%, 91.89%, 88.46% and 94.44%, respectively, in comparison with the phenotypic DST. Conclusion: GenoType® MTBDRplus has good sensitivity and specificity in detecting MDR-TB cases with a significantly lesser turnaround time as compared to conventional DST method and simultaneous detection of Rif and INH resistance. This technique saves several weeks of time required for culture and DST.     

Rapid, standardized method for determination of Mycobacterium tuberculosis drug susceptibility by use of mycolic acid analysis

Multidrug-resistant (MDR) Mycobacterium tuberculosis and extrensively drug-resistant (XDR) M. tuberculosis are emerging public health threats whose threats are compounded by the fact that current techniques for testing the susceptibility of M. tuberculosis require several days to weeks to complete. We investigated the use of high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-based quantitation of mycolic acids as a means of rapidly determining drug resistance and susceptibility in M. tuberculosis. Standard susceptibility testing and determination of the MICs of drug-susceptible (n = 26) and drug-resistant M. tuberculosis strains, including MDR M. tuberculosis strains (n = 34), were performed by using the Bactec radiometric growth system as the reference method. The HPLC-based susceptibilities of the current first-line drugs, isoniazid (INH), rifampin (RIF), ethambutol (EMB), and pyrazinamide (PZA), were determined. The vials were incubated for 72 h, and aliquots were removed for HPLC analysis by using the Sherlock mycobacterial identification system. HPLC quantitation of total mycolic acid peaks (TMAPs) was performed with treated and untreated cultures. At 72 h, the levels of agreement of the HPLC method with the reference method were 99.5% for INH, EMB, and PZA and 98.7% for RIF. The inter- and intra-assay reproducibilities varied by drug, with an average precision of 13.4%. In summary, quantitation of TMAPs is a rapid, sensitive, and accurate method for antibiotic susceptibility testing of all first-line drugs currently used against M. tuberculosis and offers the potential of providing susceptibility testing results within hours, rather than days or weeks, for clinical M. tuberculosis isolates.     

Extremely high prevalence of multidrug resistant tuberculosis in Murmansk, Russia: a population-based study

Drug resistance and molecular epidemiology of tuberculosis (TB) in the Murmansk region was investigated in a 2-year, population-based surveillance of the civilian population. During 2003 and 2004, isolates from all culture-positive cases were collected (n?=?1,226). Prevalence of multi-drug resistance (MDR) was extremely high, as 114 out of 439 new cases (26.0%), and 574 out of 787 previously treated cases (72.9%) were resistant to at least isoniazid (INH) and rifampin (RIF). Spoligotyping of the primary MDR-TB isolates revealed that most isolates grouped to the Beijing SIT1 genotype (n?=?91, 79.8%). Isolates of this genotype were further analyzed by IS6110 RFLP. Sequencing of gene targets associated with INH and RIF resistance further showed that the MDR-TB strains are highly homogeneous as 78% of the MDR, SIT1 strains had the same resistance-conferring mutations. The genetic homogeneity of the MDR-TB strains indicates that they are actively transmitted in Murmansk.     

Diagnostic Accuracy of a Molecular Drug Susceptibility Testing Method for the Antituberculosis Drug Ethambutol: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Ethambutol (EMB) is a first-line antituberculosis drug; however, drug resistance to EMB has been increasing. Molecular drug susceptibility testing (DST), based on the embB gene, has recently been used for rapid identification of EMB resistance. The aim of this meta-analysis was to establish the accuracy of molecular assay for detecting drug resistance to EMB. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched according to a written protocol and explicit study selection criteria. Measures of diagnostic accuracy were pooled using a random effects model. A total of 34 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The respective pooled sensitivities and specificities were 0.57 and 0.93 for PCR-DNA sequencing that targeted the embB 306 codon, 0.76 and 0.89 for PCR-DNA sequencing that targeted the embB 306, 406, and 497 codons, 0.64 and 0.70 for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates, 0.55 and 0.78 for detecting M. tuberculosis sputum specimens using the GenoType MTBDRsl test, 0.57 and 0.87 for pyrosequencing, and 0.35 and 0.98 for PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism. The respective pooled sensitivities and specificities were 0.55 and 0.92 when using a lower EMB concentration as the reference standard, 0.67 and 0.73 when using a higher EMB concentration as the reference standard, and 0.60 and 1.0 when using multiple reference standards. PCR-DNA sequencing using multiple sites of the embB gene as detection targets, including embB 306, 406, and 497, can be a rapid method for preliminarily screening for EMB resistance, but it does not fully replace phenotypic DST. Of the reference DST methods examined, the agreement rates were the best using MGIT 960 for molecular DST and using the proportion method on Middlebrook 7H10 media.     

Rapid Detection of Multidrug-Resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis by Use of Real-Time PCR and High-Resolution Melt Analysis

The current study describes the development of a unique real-time PCR assay for the detection of mutations conferring drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. The rifampicin resistance determinant region (RRDR) of rpoB and specific regions of katG and the inhA promoter were targeted for the detection of rifampin (RIF) and isoniazid (INH) resistance, respectively. Additionally, this assay was multiplexed to discriminate Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTC) strains from nontuberculous Mycobacteria (NTM) strains by targeting the IS6110 insertion element. High-resolution melting (HRM) analysis following real-time PCR was used to identify M. tuberculosis strains containing mutations at the targeted loci, and locked nucleic acid (LNA) probes were used to enhance the detection of strains containing specific single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) transversion mutations. This method was used to screen 252 M. tuberculosis clinical isolates, including 154 RIF-resistant strains and 174 INH-resistant strains based on the agar proportion method of drug susceptibility testing (DST). Of the 154 RIF-resistant strains, 148 were also resistant to INH and therefore classified as multidrug resistant (MDR). The assay demonstrated sensitivity and specificity of 91% and 98%, respectively, for the detection of RIF resistance and 87% and 100% for the detection of INH resistance. Overall, this assay showed a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 98% for the detection of MDR strains. This method provides a rapid, robust, and inexpensive way to detect the dominant mutations known to confer MDR in M. tuberculosis strains and offers several advantages over current molecular and culture-based techniques.The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that approximately one-third of the world''s population is infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis, with an estimated 9.27 million new cases reported in 2007 (20). In that year alone, an estimated 1.77 million people died from this treatable disease. Despite this significant burden, only a limited number of tests have been developed and implemented for the rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB). Further, since the majority of TB disease burden occurs in underdeveloped and resource-limited settings, the need for a cost-efficient method is paramount.The emergence of drug-resistant strains of M. tuberculosis is one of the most critical issues facing TB researchers and clinicians today. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) M. tuberculosis is defined as being resistant to the two best first-line drugs used to treat TB: rifampin (RIF) and isoniazid (INH). Extensively drug-resistant (XDR) M. tuberculosis is defined as having additional resistance to a fluoroquinolone (ciprofloxacin, moxifloxicin, etc.) and an injectable drug (kanamycin, capreomycin, or amakacin), the two best classes of second-line drugs. The WHO estimates that 5% of new TB cases are MDR, with approximately 10% of those actually being XDR (20). Compounding this problem is the fact that no new drugs have been developed and approved for the treatment of TB in the past 30 years (16). The limited number of antibiotics available to treat TB necessitates rapid diagnosis not only to reduce the spread of drug-resistant strains but also to monitor and limit the emergence of newly resistant strains.While RIF and INH are very effective in the treatment of susceptible strains of M. tuberculosis, drug resistance can emerge quickly, in part due to patient nonadherence to the multidrug regimen or noncontinuous treatment. The molecular basis of resistance to these drugs is well documented. The target of RIF is the β-subunit of bacterial DNA-dependent RNA polymerase, which is encoded by the rpoB gene. At the genetic level, the majority of RIF resistance is due to the accumulation of mutations within an 81-bp region of rpoB, termed the rifampicin resistance determinant region (RRDR). Mutations within this region account for up to 98% of the RIF resistance observed (15). The strong correlation between genotypic changes in this region resulting in phenotypic resistance makes the RRDR an optimal target for the design of rapid molecular diagnostics.There are two described mechanisms that account for the majority of INH resistance. The most common mechanism involves mutations within the katG gene, which encodes a catalase peroxidase whose activity is required for the activation of INH (9). Nucleotide changes resulting in amino acid substitutions at codon 315 of katG account for up to 50% of the clinical resistance to INH (15). Another less common mutation occurs in the promoter region of the inhA gene, which encodes enoyl-ACP reductase, which is required for mycolic acid biosynthesis (18). Mutations at this locus account for up to 34% of the clinical INH resistance observed and are typically found in combination with additional mutations in katG (15).The vast majority of mutations that occur within rpoB, katG, and the inhA promoter regions are due to accumulation of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), of which there are four classes (8). Class I SNPs, also called transitions, are changes in which a purine is exchanged for a purine (A/G→G/A) or a pyrimidine is exchanged for a pyrimidine (C/T→T/C) (8). Class II, III, and IV SNP changes are collectively referred to as transversions, and all involve the change of a purine to a pyrimidine, or vice versa (17). Class II changes result in A/C→C/A or T/G→G/T transversions, class III changes result in C/G→G/C transversions, and class IV changes result in A/T→T/A changes (8). These genetic mutations often result in phenotypic changes, such as RIF and INH resistance observed in M. tuberculosis, and are excellent targets for rapid molecular diagnostics.A significant obstacle in controlling TB is the amount of time required to reach a diagnosis. Due to the slow growth rate of M. tuberculosis, the initial diagnosis can take up to 6 weeks, with up to an additional 12 weeks to obtain drug susceptibility profiles for clinical isolates, depending on the techniques available to the laboratory. These labor-intensive methods can cause significant delays in identifying MDR or XDR cases, adjusting treatment regimens, and initiating epidemiological investigations. Recently, attention has shifted toward the development of dependable, molecular-based assays that can rapidly detect drug resistance. The development of new methodologies could potentially reduce the time required to diagnose drug resistance so that effective treatment regimens can be established. Direct sequencing of genes known to have a role in antibiotic resistance is one method that is currently used. However, while reliable, it is costly and may not be readily available. Another rapid method, the GenoType MTBDRplus assay (Hain Lifescience GmbH, Nehren, Germany), has made substantial contributions to the area of rapid diagnostics but still requires approximately 8 h to complete the assay and additional training to ensure that results are interpreted correctly (7). High-resolution melt (HRM) analysis is a molecular technique that can be used for detecting subtle genetic changes, such as SNPs conferring drug resistance in M. tuberculosis. By slowly melting the DNA amplicon products of a real-time PCR assay, slight genetic differences can be visualized by changes in dissociation profiles.The current study describes the use of multiple real-time PCR chemistries and HRM technology to detect RIF, INH, and more importantly, MDR strains of M. tuberculosis. This novel assay design is also capable of distinguishing M. tuberculosis complex bacteria (MTC) from nontuberculous mycobacterium (NTM) strains. This assay provides a rapid, robust, and inexpensive way to identify MDR TB that could result in numerous advantages over current molecular and culture-based techniques.     

Rolling Circle Amplification for Direct Detection of rpoB Gene Mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isolates from Clinical Specimens

Rapid and accurate detection of multidrug resistance (MDR) in Mycobacterium tuberculosis is essential to improve treatment outcomes and reduce global transmission but remains a challenge. Rifampin (RIF) resistance is a reliable marker of MDR tuberculosis (TB) since by far the majority of RIF-resistant strains are also isoniazid (INH) resistant. We have developed a rapid, sensitive, and specific method for detecting the most common mutations associated with RIF resistance, in the RIF resistance determining region (RRDR) of rpoB, using a cocktail of six padlock probes and rolling circle amplification (RCA). We used this method to test 46 stored M. tuberculosis clinical isolates with known RIF susceptibility profiles (18 RIF resistant, 28 susceptible), a standard susceptible strain (H37Rv, ATCC 27294) and 78 M. tuberculosis culture-positive clinical (sputum) samples, 59 of which grew RIF-resistant strains. All stored clinical isolates were correctly categorized, by the padlock probe/RCA method, as RIF susceptible or resistant; the sensitivity and specificity of the method, for direct detection of phenotypically RIF-resistant M. tuberculosis in clinical specimens, were 96.6 and 89.5%, respectively. This method is rapid, simple, and inexpensive and has the potential for high-throughput routine screening of clinical specimens for MDR M. tuberculosis, particularly in high prevalence settings with limited resources.     

Performance Assessment of the GenoType MTBDRplus Test and DNA Sequencing in Detection of Multidrug-Resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis

To facilitate the management of multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis, two nucleic acid sequence-based methods, the GenoType MTBDRplus test and DNA sequencing, were assessed for the rapid detection of drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis for the first time in the Asia-Pacific region. The performances of these two assays in detecting the presence of rifampin (rifampicin) (RIF) and isoniazid (INH) resistance-associated mutations in the rpoB, katG, inhA regulatory region, inhA, and oxyR-ahpC genes were compared to that of a conventional agar proportion drug susceptibility test. A total of 242 MDR and 30 pansusceptible M. tuberculosis isolates were evaluated in this study. The sensitivities obtained for RIF-resistant detection by the GenoType MTBDRplus test and by resistance gene sequencing were 95.5% and 97.9%, respectively. The sensitivities for INH resistance detection by the GenoType MTBDRplus test and by resistance gene sequencing were 81.8% and 93.4%, respectively. Together, the sensitivity for MDR tuberculosis detection was 78.5% with the GenoType MTBDRplus test and 91.3% by resistance gene sequencing. The specificity for RIF resistance, INH resistance, and MDR detection was 100% by both methods. The GenoType MTBDRplus test has the advantage of a short turnaround time for drug-resistant M. tuberculosis detection. Overall, the two assays performed equally well in detecting RIF resistance (P = 0.13). However, DNA sequencing demonstrated superior performance in detecting INH resistance (P < 0.001) and MDR tuberculosis (P < 0.001). We suggest that new alleles of INH resistance genes should be evaluated to improve the sensitivity of the GenoType MTBDRplus test, especially for different geographic areas with genetically diverse M. tuberculosis strains.The emergence of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB), defined as infection with a Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex isolate resistant to at least isoniazid (INH) and rifampin (rifampicin) (RIF), is a public health concern and threatens global TB control programs (22). In Taiwan, approximately 15,000 new TB cases are diagnosed annually, of which an estimated 4% are MDR-TB (12). Therefore, the Taiwan Centers for Disease Control (CDC) not only has strengthened directly observed treatment in the management of TB as of 2006, to prevent MDR generation, but also has implemented a DOTS-Plus (directly observed treatment, short-course) strategy for the management of MDR-TB patients as of 2007 (8). However, this program can be hampered by delayed laboratory diagnosis. The completion of diagnosis by conventional methods and drug susceptibility testing (DST) of M. tuberculosis normally take months.The World Health Organization and partners have endorsed the use of the molecular test GenoType MTBDRplus (Hain Lifescience GmbH, Nehren, Germany) for rapid detection of high-risk MDR-TB cases, even directly from certain clinical specimens (1, 4, 6, 10, 15, 21). The GenoType MTBDRplus test is a PCR-based amplification and reverse blotting assay that employs specific probes hybridized to nitrocellulose strips to detect RIF and INH resistance. The assay detects mutations in the rpoB gene for RIF resistance, in the katG gene for high-level INH resistance, and in the inhA regulatory region gene for low-level INH resistance. To evaluate the reliability of the assay, DNA sequencing analyses of rpoB for RIF and katG, the inhA regulatory region gene, inhA, or oxyR-ahpC for INH were conducted in parallel.Our previous study demonstrated the genetic diversity of MDR M. tuberculosis isolates with novel alleles in the rpoB gene in Taiwan (11). Likewise, the distribution of M. tuberculosis isolates differs in different geographic regions (5, 11). The GenoType MTBDRplus test has been assessed in Europe (6, 10, 15, 21), South Africa (4), and the Caribbean (1), but not in the Asia-Pacific region, where there is a high prevalence of Beijing family M. tuberculosis isolates. Here we report the performance of the revised GenoType MTBDRplus test compared to that of DNA sequencing using a culture-based phenotypic DST, which is considered the gold standard for routine clinical practice.     

Multicenter Evaluation of Fully Automated BACTEC Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube 960 System for Susceptibility Testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

The reliability of the BACTEC Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) 960 system for testing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis susceptibility to the three front-line drugs (isoniazid [INH], rifampin [RIF], and ethambutol [EMB]) plus streptomycin (STR) was compared to that of the BACTEC 460 TB system. The proportion method was used to resolve discrepant results by an independent arbiter. One hundred and ten strains were tested with an overall agreement of 93.5%. Discrepant results were obtained for seven strains (6.4%) with INH (resistant by BACTEC MGIT 960; susceptible by BACTEC 460 TB), for one strain (0.9%) with RIF (resistant by BACTEC MGIT 960; susceptible by BACTEC 460 TB), for seven strains (6.4%) with EMB (six resistant by BACTEC MGIT 960 and susceptible by BACTEC 460 TB; one susceptible by BACTEC MGIT 960 and resistant by BACTEC 460 TB), and for 19 strains (17.3%) with STR (resistant by BACTEC MGIT 960 and susceptible by BACTEC 460 TB). After resolution of discrepant results, the sensitivity of the BACTEC MGIT 960 system was 100% for all four drugs and specificity ranged from 89.8% for STR to 100% for RIF. Turnaround times were 4.6 to 11.7 days (median, 6.5 days) for BACTEC MGIT 960 and 4.0 to 10.0 days (median, 7.0 days) for BACTEC 460 TB. These data demonstrate that the fully automated and nonradiometric BACTEC MGIT 960 system is an accurate method for rapid susceptibility testing of M. tuberculosis.