Better approximate confidence intervals for a binomial parameter

This paper discusses five methods for constructing approximate confidence intervals for the binomial parameter Θ, based on Y successes in n Bernoulli trials. In a recent paper, Chen (1990) discusses various approximate methods and suggests a new method based on a Bayes argument, which we call method I here. Methods II and III are based on the normal approximation without and with continuity correction. Method IV uses the Poisson approximation of the binomial distribution and then exploits the fact that the exact confidence limits for the parameter of the Poisson distribution can be found through the x² distribution. The confidence limits of method IV are then provided by the Wilson-Hilferty approximation of the x². Similarly, the exact confidence limits for the binomial parameter can be expressed through the F distribution. Method V approximates these limits through a suitable version of the Wilson-Hilferty approximation. We undertake a comparison of the five methods in respect to coverage probability and expected length. The results indicate that method V has an advantage over Chen's Bayes method as well as over the other three methods.     

Approximate Confidence Limits for a Proportion of the Pólya Distribution

The problem of constructing approximate confidence limits for a proportion parameter of the Pólya distribution is discussed. Three different methods for determining approximate one-sided and two-sided confidence limits for that parameter of the Pólya distribution have been proposed and compared. Particular cases of those confidence bounds are confidence intervals for the parameter of the binomial and the hypergeometric distributions.     

Critical review and comparison of continuity correction methods: The normal approximation to the binomial distribution

We provide a comprehensive and critical review of Yates’ continuity correction for the normal approximation to the binomial distribution, in particular emphasizing its poor ability to approximate extreme tail probabilities. As an alternative method, we also review Cressie's finely tuned continuity correction. In addition, we demonstrate how Yates’ continuity correction is used to improve the coverage probability of binomial confidence limits, and propose new confidence limits by applying Cressie's continuity correction. These continuity correction methods are numerically compared and illustrated by data examples arising from industry and medicine.     

Monitoring Multivariate Simple Linear Profiles in the Presence of between Profile Autocorrelation

In recent years, statistical profile monitoring has emerged as a relatively new and potentially useful subarea of statistical process control and has attracted attention of many researchers and practitioners. A profile, waveform, or signature is a function that relates a dependent or a response variable to one or more independent variables. Different statistical methods have been proposed by researchers to monitor profiles where each method requires its own assumptions. One of the common and implicit assumptions in most of the proposed procedures is the assumption of independent residuals. Violation of this assumption can affect the performance of control procedures and ultimately leading to misleading results. In this article, we study phase II analysis of monitoring multivariate simple linear profiles when the independency assumption is violated. Three time series based methods are proposed to eliminate the effect of correlation that exists between multivariate profiles. Performances of the proposed methods are evaluated using average run length (ARL) criterion. Numerical results indicate satisfactory performance for the proposed methods. A simulated example is also used to show the application of the proposed methods.     

Using Auxiliary Data for Binomial Parameter Estimation with Nonignorable Nonresponse

Nonignorable nonresponse is a nonresponse mechanism that depends on the values of the variable having nonresponse. When an observed data of a binomial distribution suffer missing values from a nonignorable nonresponse mechanism, the binomial distribution parameters become unidentifiable without any other auxiliary information or assumption. To address the problems of non identifiability, existing methods mostly based on the log-linear regression model. In this article, we focus on the model when the nonresponse is nonignorable and we consider to use the auxiliary data to improve identifiability; furthermore, we derive the maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) for the binomial proportion and its associated variance. We present results for an analysis of real-life data from the SARS study in China. Finally, the simulation study shows that the proposed method gives promising results.     

Confidence Intervals for Survival Probabilities: A Comparison Study

The confidence interval of the Kaplan–Meier estimate of the survival probability at a fixed time point is often constructed by the Greenwood formula. This normal approximation-based method can be looked as a Wald type confidence interval for a binomial proportion, the survival probability, using the “effective” sample size defined by Cutler and Ederer. Wald-type binomial confidence interval has been shown to perform poorly comparing to other methods. We choose three methods of binomial confidence intervals for the construction of confidence interval for survival probability: Wilson's method, Agresti–Coull's method, and higher-order asymptotic likelihood method. The methods of “effective” sample size proposed by Peto et al. and Dorey and Korn are also considered. The Greenwood formula is far from satisfactory, while confidence intervals based on the three methods of binomial proportion using Cutler and Ederer's “effective” sample size have much better performance.     

一种简单有效的二项分布比例参数似然比置信区间的求法

对二项分布比例参数p的似然比置信区间,提出一种简便求解方法。在平均覆盖率、平均区间长度及区间长度的95%置信区间准则下与WScore、Plus4、Jeffreys置信区间进行模拟比较。试验表明,在二项分布b(n,p)的参数n≥20且p∈(0.1,0.9)时,该方法获取的似然比置信区间性能优良。当点估计p值不是接近于0或1且n≥20时,推荐使用本方法获取p的置信区间。     

Exact likelihood ratio and score confidence intervals for the binomial proportion

Many methods are available for computing a confidence interval for the binomial parameter, and these methods differ in their operating characteristics. It has been suggested in the literature that the use of the exact likelihood ratio (LR) confidence interval for the binomial proportion should be considered. This paper provides an evaluation of the operating characteristics of the two‐sided exact LR and exact score confidence intervals for the binomial proportion and compares these results to those for three other methods that also strictly maintain nominal coverage: Clopper‐Pearson, Blaker, and Casella. In addition, the operating characteristics of the two‐sided exact LR method and exact score method are compared with those of the corresponding asymptotic methods to investigate the adequacy of the asymptotic approximation. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Confidence regions for two proportions from independent negative binomial distributions

The negative binomial distribution offers an alternative view to the binomial distribution for modeling count data. This alternative view is particularly useful when the probability of success is very small, because, unlike the fixed sampling scheme of the binomial distribution, the inverse sampling approach allows one to collect enough data in order to adequately estimate the proportion of success. However, despite work that has been done on the joint estimation of two binomial proportions from independent samples, there is little, if any, similar work for negative binomial proportions. In this paper, we construct and investigate three confidence regions for two negative binomial proportions based on three statistics: the Wald (W), score (S) and likelihood ratio (LR) statistics. For large-to-moderate sample sizes, this paper finds that all three regions have good coverage properties, with comparable average areas for large sample sizes but with the S method producing the smaller regions for moderate sample sizes. In the small sample case, the LR method has good coverage properties, but often at the expense of comparatively larger areas. Finally, we apply these three regions to some real data for the joint estimation of liver damage rates in patients taking one of two drugs.     

On confidence limits for the difference of two binomial parameters

In the present article we suggest two new methods for calculating approximate confidence limits for the differences of the two binomial parameters. Different methods for determining the confidence interval are compared.     

A process capability index for discrete processes

Perakis and Xekalaki 2002, A process capability index that is based on the proportion of conformance. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 72(9), 707–718. introduced a process capability index that is based on the proportion of conformance of the process under study and has several appealing features. One of its advantages is that it can be used not only for continuous processes, as is the case with the majority of the indices considered in the literature, but also for discrete processes as well. In this article, the use of this index is investigated for discrete data under two alternative models, which are frequently considered in statistical process control. In particular, distributional properties and estimation of the index are considered for Poisson processes and for processes resulting in modeling attribute data. The performance of the suggested estimators and confidence limits is tested via simulation.     

An improved score interval with a modified midpoint for a binomial proportion

One of the most basic and important problems in statistical inference is the construction of the confidence interval (CI). In this paper, we propose a novel CI for a binomial proportion by modifying the midpoint of the score interval. The proposed modified interval can solve the ‘downward spikes’ problem of the score interval without enlarging the interval length. Simulation studies are carried out to illustrate the performance of the modified interval. With regard to the criterions of coverage probability, mean absolute error and expected length, our method is competitive among the several commonly used methods for constructing a CI. A real data example is also presented to show the application of our method.     

Confidence interval estimation for negative binomial group distribution

Negative binomial group distribution was proposed in the literature which was motivated by inverse sampling when considering group inspection: products are inspected group by group, and the number of non-conforming items of a group is recorded only until the inspection of the whole group is finished. The non-conforming probability p of the population is thus the parameter of interest. In this paper, the confidence interval construction for this parameter is investigated. The common normal approximation and exact method are applied. To overcome the drawbacks of these commonly used methods, a composite method that is based on the confidence intervals of the negative binomial distribution is proposed, which benefits from the relationship between negative binomial distribution and negative binomial group distribution. Simulation studies are carried out to examine the performances of our methods. A real data example is also presented to illustrate the application of our method.     

Negative binomial control limits for count data with extra‐Poisson variation

Traditional techniques for calculating control limits for processes with discrete responses are based on the Poisson distribution. However, for many processes, the assumption of a Poisson distribution is violated. In such cases, use of traditional Poisson control limits may result in an inflated risk of Type I error. The negative binomial distribution is a natural extension of the Poisson distribution and allows for over‐dispersion relative to the Poisson distribution. A simple approach to calculating exact and approximate control limits for count data based on the negative binomial distribution is described. The approach is illustrated by application to water bacteria count data taken from a water purification system. Copyright © 2003 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

The M-Bayesian Credible Limits of the Reliability Derived from Binomial Distribution

This article introduces a new method, M-Bayesian credible limit method, to estimate reliability derived from binomial distribution, in the case of zero-failure data. Firstly, the definition of one-sided and two-sided M-Bayesian credible limits are provided, and moreover, formulas of one-sided and two-sided M-Bayesian credible limits are also provided. secondly, properties of one-sided and two-sided M-Bayesian credible limits are discussed, and we will see that the M-Bayesian credible limit method is superior to the corresponding classical confidence limit method. Finally, the new estimation method is applied to a numerical example. Through the example the efficiency and easiness of operation of this method are commended.     

New V control chart for the Maxwell distribution

Control charts have been popularly used as a user-friendly yet technically sophisticated tool to monitor whether a process is in statistical control or not. These charts are basically constructed under the normality assumption. But in many practical situations in real life this normality assumption may be violated. One such non-normal situation is to monitor the process variability from a skewed parent distribution where we propose the use of a Maxwell control chart. We introduce a pivotal quantity for the scale parameter of the Maxwell distribution which follows a gamma distribution. Probability limits and L-sigma limits are studied along with performance measure based on average run length and power curve. To avoid the complexity of future calculations for practitioners, factors for constructing control chart for monitoring the Maxwell parameter are given for different sample sizes and for different false alarm rate. We also provide simulated data to illustrate the Maxwell control chart. Finally, a real life example has been given to show the importance of such a control chart.     

The monotone boundary property and the full coverage property of confidence intervals for a binomial proportion

The methodology for deriving the exact confidence coefficient of some confidence intervals for a binomial proportion is proposed in Wang [2007. Exact confidence coefficients of confidence intervals for a binomial proportion. Statist. Sinica 17, 361–368]. The methodology requires two conditions of confidence intervals: the monotone boundary property and the full coverage property. In this paper, we show that for some confidence intervals of a binomial proportion, the two properties hold for any sample size. Based on results presented in this paper, the procedure in Wang [2007. Exact confidence coefficients of confidence intervals for a binomial proportion. Statist. Sinica 17, 361–368] can be directly used to calculate the exact confidence coefficients of these confidence intervals for any fixed sample size.     

The robustness of the likelihood ratio test,the nonparametric sum rank test,and f-ratio tests when the populations are from the negative binomial family

In this study, the robustness of power and significance level of several statistical testing methods was evaluated under the assumption that the test populations were from Poisson, negative binomial, or geometric distributions. The F-ratio test, with or without appropriate transformations, was shown to be both safe and robust for all distributions examined.     

A comment on sample size calculations for binomial confidence intervals

In this article we examine sample size calculations for a binomial proportion based on the confidence interval width of the Agresti–Coull, Wald and Wilson Score intervals. We pointed out that the commonly used methods based on known and fixed standard errors cannot guarantee the desired confidence interval width given a hypothesized proportion. Therefore, a new adjusted sample size calculation method was introduced, which is based on the conditional expectation of the width of the confidence interval given the hypothesized proportion. With the reduced sample size, the coverage probability can still maintain at the nominal level and is very competitive to the converge probability for the original sample size.     

Approximate Confidence Limits for the Difference between Parameters of Two Pólya Distributions

The problem of calculating approximate confidence limits for the difference between success probability parameters of two Pólya distributions is solved for the first time. We suggest some new methods for determining these approximate confidence limits and consider their application to special cases: namely for the binomial and hypergeometric distributions. The various approximate confidence limits are evaluated and compared.