Medullary Carcinoma of the Thyroid With Axillary Metastasis: A Case Report

We report a case of axillary lymph node metastasis as a consequence of medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) in a 42-year-old man. On January 2009, the patient was referred to us for the management of right cervical lymph node enlargement. Total thyroidectomy was performed with right-sided functional neck dissection. Postoperative histopathology revealed MTC in the right lobe of the thyroid, with extrathyroidal extension and right-sided neck metastases. Multiple left cervical, mediastinal, and right axillary lymphadenopathies were detected at the third year follow-up exam. Left-sided functional neck dissection, axillary lymph node dissection, and mediastinal lymph node dissection were performed, and the pathologic outcomes revealed as the metastatic dissemination of MTC. After a disease-free term for 1 year, multiple metastatic lesions were detected in the patient.Key words: Medullary thyroid cancer, Lymph node metastasis, Axillary involvementMedullary thyroid cancer (MTC) is a rare tumor originating from the parafollicular C cells of the thyroid gland. MTC accounts for approximately 3% to 5% of all thyroid cancers.¹ The frequently used prognostic markers in the follow-up period of MTC patients are serum calcitonin and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels. Calcitonin hormone is a specific and sensitive biomarker for parafollicular C-cell disorders. The CEA produced by neoplastic C cells is generally considered a marker of dedifferentiation and is associated with worse prognosis for MTC.^2,3 MTC may occur sporadically or may be inherited. Hereditary forms of this cancer account for 25% of all cases and include familial MTC and multiple endocrine neoplasia syndromes (MEN 2A, MEN 2B). Seventy-five percent of cases are sporadic.⁴ The overall prognosis of MTC is affirmative, with a 10-year overall survival rate of approximately 95% for patients with tumors confined to the thyroid gland. However, for patients with distant metastasis at presentation, the 10-year overall survival rate is estimated to be only 40%.⁵ For metastatic cases, lymph node involvement is very common throughout the clinical course. During initial staging, the incidence of pathologically proven cervical lymph node metastasis has been reported as 71% to 80%^6–8; the corresponding value for mediastinal involvement is 36%.^6,8 Whereas, distant metastases have been reported in 20% of MTC patients.⁹ Considering the spectrum of MTC, axillary lymph node metastasis (LNM) is rare, and there are reports of isolated cases.^10–12     

Preoperative Carcinoembryonic Antigen and Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer. An Independent Prognostic Factor Still Reliable

To evaluate whether, in a sample of patients radically treated for colorectal carcinoma, the preoperative determination of the carcinoembryonic antigen (p-CEA) may have a prognostic value and constitute an independent risk factor in relation to disease-free survival. The preoperative CEA seems to be related both to the staging of colorectal neoplasia and to the patient''s prognosis, although this—to date—has not been conclusively demonstrated and is still a matter of intense debate in the scientific community. This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. A total of 395 patients were radically treated for colorectal carcinoma. The preoperative CEA was statistically compared with the 2010 American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging, the T and N parameters, and grading. All parameters recorded in our database were tested for an association with disease-free survival (DFS). Only factors significantly associated (P < 0.05) with the DFS were used to build multivariate stepwise forward logistic regression models to establish their independent predictors. A statistically significant relationship was found between p-CEA and tumor staging (P < 0.001), T (P < 0.001) and N parameters (P = 0.006). In a multivariate analysis, the independent prognostic factors found were: p-CEA, stages N1 and N2 according to AJCC, and G3 grading (grade). A statistically significant difference (P < 0.001) was evident between the DFS of patients with normal and high p-CEA levels. Preoperative CEA makes a pre-operative selection possible of those patients for whom it is likely to be able to predict a more advanced staging.Key words: Colorectal carcinoma, Preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen, Disease-free survival, Independent prognostic factorIn the world today, more than 1 million cases of patients with colorectal neoplasia are identified each year. Forty percent of these will have a poor prognosis for which targeted therapeutic strategies could most likely be more effective.^1–3 For this reason, finding prognostic factors that are early, reliable, and related to the extent of the tumor is of the utmost importance. Among these, the most that are considered even to this day are T and N parameters.^1,2,4,5 Less relied upon, however, is the M parameter, which is often understaged due to inadequate pretreatment diagnostic methods.⁶ However, these parameters, which are available to us only after surgery, do not represent the gold standard. In fact, the prognosis of patients with the same staging is often various and that the need to continually implement ever-changing variables in an already excessively fragmented staging is still present.^2,4,7–9Recently, in light of these needs, great attention has been paid to the study of molecular and genetic markers. At present, these markers still have not found a regular application due to the complexity of their determination, the difficulty of standardization and, last but not least, the low cost-benefit ratio.^1,3,4,9,10With this in mind, in our opinion, the carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) maintains its position, as for over 30 years it has continued to be the most widely used marker¹¹ and whose validity, with regard to colorectal follow-up, has been sanctioned by leading organizations such as the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)¹² and the European Group on Tumor Markers.¹³ Moreover, as Herrera¹⁴ and Wanebo¹⁵ had already reported by the end of the ‘70s, the preoperative determination of the CEA (p-CEA) seems to be related both to the staging of colorectal neoplasia and to the patient''s prognosis. However, to date, none of this has been conclusively demonstrated and is still a matter of intense debate both in prestigious scientific journals^{4,7,11,16–21} as well as in different guidelines.²²The American Society of Clinical Oncology itself, if on the one hand suggests using the determination of the CEA in the preoperative staging thus justifying a worse prognosis when increased,¹² on the other, does not validate using the p-CEA in the determination of an adjuvant or neo-adjuvant therapeutic strategy.²³Regarding this issue, we believe it still pertinent to evaluate whether in a sample of patients radically treated for colorectal carcinoma, the determination of the p-CEA may have a prognostic value and constitute an independent risk factor in relation to disease-free survival (DFS).     

Improved Health-Related Quality of Life After Surgical Management of Severe Refractory Constipation-Dominant Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is the most common of the functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs). Despite its prevalence and health-care costs, there are few effective therapies for patients with severe symptoms. Our objective was to determine whether surgical management would improve health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in severe refractory constipation-dominant FGIDs. From 2003 to 2005, 6 patients underwent total colectomy with end ileostomy or primary anastomosis. They completed Short Form 36 (SF-36) and IBS-36 questionnaires preoperatively and postoperatively. HRQOL was compared with age- and sex-matched Canadian norms using Welch''s unpaired t test. Preoperative SF-36 physical and mental health summary scores were significantly lower than Canadian norms (P < 0.0001), while postoperative scores were not significantly different than Canadian norms (P = 0.50 and P = 0.57, respectively). After surgical management, HRQOL in patients with severe constipation-dominant IBS improved from drastically below that of Canadian norms to a comparable level. This finding questions the convention of avoiding operations in IBS patients and demonstrates that surgical management may be suitable for the appropriately screened patient.Key words: Health-related quality of life, Surgery, Irritable bowel syndromeIrritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is one of 20 functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs). These are a heterogeneous group of chronic disorders in which the presenting gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms cannot be explained by structural or biochemical abnormalities.^1,2 IBS is characterized by abdominal pain associated with defecation, change in bowel habit, bloating, and distension.^3,4 The ROME III committee developed a set of diagnostic criteria for each FGID separately.^3,4 However, it has become increasingly accepted that the FGIDs overlap considerably and therefore, IBS should not be considered as a single entity but rather on a spectrum of related disorders.^1,5IBS is the most common of the FGIDs with a prevalence rate in the United States anywhere from 3% to 20%, with most studies quoting around 10%.^1,2 Although up to 70% of IBS sufferers in the United States do not seek medical attention, the total health-care costs and burden to the health-care system is substantial.^5,6 In fact, in the United States, among GI illnesses, IBS was second only to gastroesophageal reflux disease in prevalence in a comprehensive assessment of burden of illness.⁵ In addition, the estimated direct and indirect annual health-care costs of IBS in the United States are $1.6 billion and $19.2 billion, respectively.^1,5 Despite the high expenditure for this illness, there are very limited effective treatment options, and patients continue to demonstrate poor health-related quality of life (HRQOL), which is comparable to that seen in patients with organic disease.^1,7–12Treatment options have largely been directed at symptom relief and vary depending on symptom severity. They include any and all of the following: education and reassurance, diet and lifestyle modification, pharmacotherapy directed at relief of bowel-specific symptoms with medications (such as anticholinergics, antispasmodics, antidiarrheals, and laxatives), as well as antidepressants and narcotics, along with referrals to mental health and pain services.^2,5,13 A combination of the above therapies has been somewhat effective in patients with mild to moderate symptoms; however, in moderate to severe cases, patients often have symptoms that are refractory and persistent despite exhaustive use of the above modalities.Patients who suffer from severe symptoms of IBS commonly present with a picture of acute severe abdominal and/or pelvic pain and frequently undergo unnecessary emergent abdominopelvic surgeries.^14–17 As the literature would suggest, these surgeries are often nontherapeutic, and thus it is a general convention to avoid operating on patients with IBS and other FGIDs for the purpose of symptom control.^14–17 Nevertheless, there are some motility-disordered patients who have such intractable symptoms as to severely diminish their quality of life. These patients have received operative management aimed at ameliorating their symptoms and thus improving their lives. At our tertiary care center, we have identified a group of such motility-disordered patients. Patient accounts of their disease experience relate severe pain and constipation leading to debilitating loss of daily functioning, emotional distress, disability, and impaired quality of life. The objective of this study was to determine whether surgical management of severe refractory constipation-dominant motility disorders in adult patients would result in improved HRQOL.     

High Expression of DARPP-32 in Colorectal Cancer Is Associated With Liver Metastases and Predicts Survival for Dukes A and B Patients: Results of a Pilot Study

The purpose of this study was to investigate prognostic significance of Dopamine and cAMP-Regulated neuronal Phosphoprotein 32 (DARPP-32) expression in primary colorectal cancer. The study material consisted of clinical and histopathological data of 100 patients operated for colorectal cancer between 1994 and 1997. For immunohistochemical analysis, specific rabbit antibodies for DARPP-32 were used and the percentage of stained tumor cells was calculated under gross magnification (400 times) on a sample of 500 tumor cells. DARPP-32 expression in the primary tumor was significantly greater in patients with distant metastases compared to patients with no distant metastases (p=0.002). In multivariate regression analysis, DARPP-32 expression in the primary tumor was a significant predictor of distant metastases. With a cut-off point of 76.5%, DARPP-32 expression in the primary tumor significantly influenced both overall and disease free survival, especially for Dukes A and B patients (p=0.037). The results of this study indicate that DARPP-32 may be a potential marker of worse prognosis and a valuable tool for managing further adjuvant treatment in patients with stages Dukes A and B colorectal cancer.Key words: Colorectal neoplasms, Dopamine and cAMP-regulated phosphoprotein 32, Humans, Nerve tissue proteins, Liver metastasesColorectal cancer is the second most common cause of cancer related death in Western Europe and the United States, with the incidence of 50/100,000 population.¹ In spite of significant developments in surgery and new chemotherapy drugs and protocols as well as radiotherapy regimens, this malignancy still has high mortality.²The 5-year survival rate of colorectal cancer patients with Dukes A cancer ranges from 74 to 93%. Patients with Dukes B cancer have a 5-year survival of 40 to 82%, and those with positive lymph nodes (Dukes C) have a 5-year survival rate of 30 to 59%.^3,4 Recurrences are observed in as much as 34% of patients with Dukes A and B stage, compared with 59% in patients with lymph node metastases.⁵Liver metastases are a well proven major determinant of survival in patients with colorectal cancer.^2,6 Therefore, better selection of patients with potential to develop liver metastases or those having occult metastases may increase the survival of those patients in whom adjuvant therapies would not otherwise be indicated.^2,5,7Recently, overexpression of dopamine and 3′5′-cyclic adenosine monophosphate regulated neuronal phosphoprotein 32 (DARPP-32) has been found in several gastrointestinal adenocarcinomas.⁸ Although most of the research on this protein focused on its role in the central nervous system,^9–11 the finding of overexpression of this protein in cancer tissues brought up the hypothesis of its role in carcinogenesis.^8,12 Genetic studies led to the discovery of frequent 17q DNA amplifications in gastric cancer.⁸ Subsequently, the gene located at this site, called PPP1R1B, has been sequenced and found to encode DARPP-32 molecule, that was brought into connection with several malignancies.^8,13–18 The DARPP-32 molecule is a protein with molecular mass of 32 kDa, consisting of 204 amino acids and 4 phosphorylation sites: Thr34, Thr75, Ser102, and Ser137. Depending on the phosphorylation of 1 of these 4 amino acids, the DARPP-32 molecule is acting as the signal integrator and as the regulator of the phosphorylase and kinase activities in eukaryotic cells.¹⁹Basic research indicates that DARPP-32 may be associated with worse prognosis in some carcinomas.²⁰ However, it is remains unknown if evaluation of DARPP-32 expression in colorectal cancer patients may aid to evaluate prognosis.The purpose of this study was to investigate possible associations of DARPP-32 expression in primary colorectal cancer with known prognostic determinants of colorectal cancer and therefore set the basis for further clinical research.     

Heterotopic Pancreatic Pseudocyst Radiologically Mimicking Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

Heterotopic pancreas is a relatively common variant of foregut embryologic dystopia that can be described as pancreatic tissue found outside the normal anatomic location, being independent from vascular supply of normal pancreas. Having all features of pancreatic tissue except for the major duct structures, this ectopic tissue may be clinically recognized when pathologic changes take place. Inflammation, hemorrhagic or obstructive states, and eventually malignancy-related problems may become a diagnostic challenge for clinician and finally lead to consequences of misdiagnosis. In this article we will discuss a case of heterotopic pancreatic tissue located in gastric cardia, which was diagnosed preoperatively as gastrointestinal stromal tumor.Key words: Ectopic pancreas, Pseudocyst, Gastrointestinal stromal tumor, MisdiagnosisHeterotopic (ectopic) pancreas is defined as the presence of pancreatic tissue in an aberrant site that is not anatomically and vascularly connected to the pancreas proper.^1,2 Ectopic pancreatic tissue is most commonly found in the duodenum (particularly the second portion), ampulla, stomach (prepyloric antrum), and upper jejunum; it can also occur in the liver, biliary tract, Meckel''s diverticulum, and several other sites such as large bowel, spleen, omentum, mediastinum, lung, thyroid, and even brain.^1–6 The heterotopic pancreatic tissue is usually located in the submucosa and/or the muscularis or subserosa.^1,2,4Practically any pancreatic pathology can also occur in the heterotopic pancreatic tissue including acute pancreatitis and neoplastic transformation.^1,4,7,8 Episodes of acute pancreatitis may cause local inflammation and typical pancreatitis-related complications in the host organ. The ectopic pancreatic tissue can lead to ulceration and bleeding in the cases located beneath a mucosa. Being a mass-forming lesion, it may also result in luminal obstruction (particularly in the prepyloric antrum).^1,4Although it is a relatively common congenital anomaly (0.5% to 13% in autopsy series), in most cases heterotopic pancreas remains clinically silent and is found incidentally during surgery or an endoscopic and/or radiological investigation.^1,9 Heterotopic pancreas may be confused with other solid tumors of the host organ.Heterotopic pancreas in the stomach is usually located in the prepyloric area.¹⁰ We report here an unusual case of heterotopic pancreas with a pseudocyst formation in the gastric cardia mimicking gastrointestinal stromal tumor.     

Giant Extraluminal Leiomyoma of the Colon: Rare Cause of Symptomatic Pelvic Mass

Leiomyomas (LMs) may appear throughout the entire gastrointestinal tract but are rarely seen in the colon-rectum and only 5 of those measured greater than 15 cm in diameter. Pain and palpable abdominal mass are the most common symptoms. Surgical resection is the treatment of choice for most LMs. We here describe a case of a 46-year-old woman who presented with a 3-month history of abdominal pain associated with worsening constipation and abdominal distension. A pelvic solid, polylobulate, left-sided mass was noted on examination. Preoperative findings revealed a dishomogeneous sigmoid mass with calcified spots compressing small intestine and bladder. At laparotomy, a large polylobulate and well-circumscribed mass arising from the descending colon mesentery and displacing small intestine, uterus, and ovaries. A segmental colon resection was performed. An extraluminal 18- × 12- × 5-cm paucicellular sigmoid colon leiomyoma was histologically diagnosed. Our case is one of the few giant (>15 cm) sigmoid colon LMs reported in the literature. Although rare and benign in nature, LMs of the colon can cause life-threatening complications that could require emergency treatment and they should be included in the differential diagnosis of large abdominopelvic masses. Follow-up after surgery is necessary for tumors with any atypia or mitotic activity.Key words: Leiomyoma, Digestive tract, Bowel obstruction, Pelvic massPrimary leiomyomas (LMs) present most commonly in the female genital tract and skin but they are rarely seen in the colon-rectum. Macroscopically, LMs may be intraluminal, intramural, extramural, or dumbbell.^1,2 The majority of LMs remain asymptomatic until they have reached a large size: most common symptoms are pain and palpable abdominal mass.^1,2 Symptomatic left colon LMs are uncommon and only 5 of those reported in the literature measured greater than 15 cm in diameter.¹ Histologically, most of them arise from the muscularis propria.^1,3 The most important differential diagnoses are malignant leiomyosarcoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST).^1,3 Surgical resection is the treatment of choice for large LMs: complete excision should be always attempted and follow up is necessary for tumors with any atypia or mitotic activity.^1,2 Although rare and benign in nature, LMs of the colon can cause life-threatening complications that require emergency treatment.^1–3 We here describe a case of large extraluminal sigmoid colon LM causing pain and worsening bowel obstruction.     

Substernal Goiter: When is a Sternotomy Required?

The presence of substernal goiter is, per se, an indication for surgical management. Surgical approach of substernal goiter can most commonly be performed using the cervical access, but at times, a sternotomy or thoracotomy is necessary. The aim of this study was to identify the preoperative predictors of a sternotomy in the management of substernal goiter in order to provide better preoperative planning and patient consent. Between 2005 and 2012, 665 patients were referred to our clinic for thyroidectomy, 42 patients (6.3%) had substernal goiter and were included in this study. All substernal goiters were treated surgically, 38 (90.5%) by a cervical approach and 4 (9.5%) by full median sternotomy. All surgeries were successful, with no major postoperative complications. Minor postoperative complications of transient hypocalcemia and transient paralysis of the recurrent laryngeal nerve occurred in 5 (11.9%) and 2 (4.7%) cases, respectively. Indication of median sternotomy was as follows: extension of goiter below the aortic arch, large thyroid tissue extending towards tracheal bifurcation, and ectopic thyroid tissue in the mediastinum. Substernal goiter can be removed through a cervical incision, but on rare occasions, a median sternotomy may be required.Key words: Sternotomy, Substernal goiter, Surgery, TreatmentSubsternal goiter (SG) was first described by Haller in 1749 and first surgically removed by Klein in 1820.¹⁻⁴ There is no uniform definition of substernal goiter.¹⁻³ However, various different criteria have been suggested by authors. These include a thyroid gland extending 3 cm below the sternal notch or extension of the gland below the fourth thoracic vertebra.^5,6 An extension of the thyroid gland below the thoracic inlet has been defined as substernal, retrosternal, intrathoracic, or mediastinal goiter. Drawing upon the relationship of the intrathoracic extension of SG to the arcus aorta and the right atrium and findings from imaging methods, diagnostic classifications have been established that take into account the percentage of goitrous thyroid in the mediastinum.^7,8 Substernal goiters are common, with a reported incidence of 1−20% of all patients undergoing thyroidectomy.^3,5,9−14 Diagnosis of substernal goiter is most frequently made in the fifth or sixth decade of life, with a female/male rate of 4:1.^11,14,15 The vast majority of SGs (85−90%) are located in the anterior mediastinum with the remainder (10−15%) located in the posterior mediastinum.^1,10,16,17Substernal goiters show, in most cases, a slow-growing enlargement, which usually remain asymptomatic for many years; about 20−40% of substernal goiters are discovered as an incidental finding on a radiographic examination.^2,11,18 Patients with mediastinal goiter are rarely asymptomatic. The most common symptoms are related to compression of the airways and the esophagus, and represented by dyspnea, choking, inability to sleep comfortably, dysphagia, and hoarseness.^2,12,14,18 In the diagnostic management of mediastinal goiter, chest computed tomography (CT) was of the highest value. CT scanning is, at present, the most exhaustive examination for assessment of the extent of the goiter and compression effects on adjacent anatomic structures. A preoperative CT scan should be routinely performed in every suspicion of a substernal goiter.^12,19−21 Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) adds little additional information to that obtained with CT and is not routinely used.¹¹Substernal goiter must be removed surgically due to relation to compressive symptoms, potential airway compromise, and the possibility of an association with thyroid malignancy.¹⁷ There is a general consensus that most can be successfully removed via a cervical approach and that thoracic access is rarely necessary.^9,11,12 Various factors have been reported to increase the likelihood of a median sternotomy being required. These factors include involvement of the posterior mediastinum, extension of the goiter to the aortic arch, recurrent goiter, superior vena cava obstruction, malignancy with local involvement, and emergent airway obstruction.^{6,10,12,16,17,19} In addition, inability to palpate the lowermost extent of the gland also is considered to be an indication for median sternotomy. The incidence of sternotomy in substernal goiter is variable, ranging between 0−11 %.^2,9,11,12 This wide range in incidence might be related to variation in the definition of substernal goiter.In order to improve preoperative planning and patient consent, we aimed to identify the preoperative predictors of a sternotomy in the management of substernal goiter.     

Effect of Intraoperative Valsalva Maneuver Application on Bleeding Point Detection and Postoperative Drainage After Thyroidectomy Surgeries

The purpose of this paper was to analyze the effect of Valsalva maneuver application before finalizing thyroidectomy operations on the identification of bleeding points and postoperational drainage. One hundred patients (age range, 24–76 years) with multinodular goiter, recurrent multinodular goiter, toxic diffuse multinodular goiter, or papillary thyroid cancer were included in the study and were divided into 2 groups of 50 randomly. Both groups underwent thyroidectomy operation, only 1 group received intraoperative Valsalva maneuver application (twice, 30 seconds of 30-cm PEEP). The size of the thyroid gland, the duration of operation, hospital stay, and drain usage were reported. Postoperational occurrences of drainage, hematoma, reoperation, and additional complications were compared between the groups. Valsalva maneuver application helped to identify minor bleeding points in 32% of the cases. There was no significant difference between the study groups regarding the thyroid gland size, operation duration, hospital stay, and the duration of drain usage (P > 0.05 for all). The amount of drainage as well as the frequencies of hematoma, reoperation, and further complications was not significantly different between the study groups (P > 0.05 for all). Intraoperative application of Valsalva maneuver is only useful to detect minor bleeding points in some patients during thyroidectomy operations, but it had no effect on the duration of postoperative drain usage, the amount of drainage, and risk of hematoma. Therefore, intraoperative application of Valsalva maneuver has no beneficial effect on postoperative hemorrhagic complication after thyroidectomy operations.Key words: Drainage, Hemostasis, Thyroidectomy, Valsalva maneuverThyroidectomy is one of the most commonly performed operations worldwide.¹ Though a series of improvements were introduced to the operation process, still several postoperative complications remain to be faced such as seroma, wound infection, skin flap complications, and hematoma.^2,3Despite the richness of the blood vessels in the thyroid area,⁴ the rate of postoperational bleedings thus hematoma events are low (1–5% of the cases).⁵ However, once not controlled, hematoma can result in airway compression and create a life-threatening situation for the patient.⁶ Hence, preventive measures have been emphasized and employed to avoid postoperational bleedings after thyroidectomy. These approaches range from exercises to avoid Valsalva maneuver kind of forces such as coughing or straining at opening bowel⁷ to the use of drains after the operation. However, recent literature indicates that the drain usage does not have a significant effect on the recovery period or on the duration of the hospital stay.^3,5,8,9 Furthermore, it may cause wound infection and contribute to the discomfort of the patients.^5,8,10,11 Thus a proper hemostasis and an early detection of potential bleeding sites are crucial steps for a successful operation and a steady recovery period.⁴ Several techniques have been used to detect and treat bleeding points immediately after the operation to prevent postoperational hematoma. These techniques involve the use of hydrogen peroxide, water in the wound, Valsalva maneuver, and Trendelenburg tilt.^4,7 Recently, the success of Valsalva maneuver and Trendelenburg tilt application on bleeding point detection was demonstrated by Moumoulidis et al.⁴ However, no further information is provided until now regarding the postoperational evaluation of the patients.In this paper, we aim to analyze the effect of the Valsalva maneuver application on the identification of bleeding points before finalizing the surgery and its influence on the postoperative drainage, complications, and recovery process.     

Palliation With Endoscopic Metal Stents May Be Preferable to Surgical Intervention for Patients With Obstructive Pancreatic Head Adenocarcinoma

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of endoscopically placed metal stents in comparison with operative procedures, in patients with obstructive pancreatic head cancer. Endoscopic stenting techniques and materials for gastrointestinal malignancies are constantly improving. Despite this evolution, many still consider operative procedures to be the gold standard for palliation in patients with unresectable obstructive pancreatic head cancer. This is a retrospective study of 52 patients who were diagnosed with obstructive (biliary, duodenal, or both) adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head. Twenty-nine patients (endoscopy group) underwent endoscopic stenting. Eleven patients (bypass group) underwent biliodigestive bypass. Twelve patients (Whipple group) underwent Whipple operation with curative intent; however, histopathology revealed R1 resection (palliative Whipple). T₄ disease was identified in 13 (44.8%), 7 (63.6%), and 3 (25%) patients in the endoscopy, bypass, and Whipple groups, respectively. Metastatic disease was present only in the endoscopy group (n = 12; 41.3%). There was no intervention-related mortality. Median survival was 280 days [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 103, 456 days], 157 days (95% CI, 0, 411 days), and 647 days (95% CI, 300, 993 days) for the endoscopy, bypass, and Whipple groups, respectively (P = 0.111). In patients with obstructive pancreatic head cancer, endoscopic stenting may offer equally good palliation compared with surgical double bypass. The numerically (not statistically) better survival after palliative Whipple might be explained by the smaller tumor burden in this subgroup of patients and not by the superior efficacy of this operation.Key words: Palliation, Endoscopy, Metal stents, Biliodigestive bypass, Pancreaticoduodenectomy, Pancreatic adenocarcinomaAt presentation, patients given a diagnosis of pancreatic head adenocarcinoma will have approximately 10%, 35%, and 55% localized (upfront or potentially resectable), locally advanced, and metastatic disease, respectively.¹ Jaundice from mechanical obstruction of the common bile duct is the main presenting symptom in 80% of these patients. In addition, almost half of the patients will develop duodenal obstruction secondary to tumor overgrowth.² It is well documented that treatment of the malignant obstruction improves quality of life.³The most widely used palliative treatment of malignant biliary obstruction is the endoscopic placement of metal stents, especially if the patient''s estimated life expectancy exceeds 6 months.⁴ Metal stents yield biliary patencies of almost 2 years.⁵ On the other hand, when there is concomitant duodenal obstruction, literature favors surgical (biliodigestive bypass) over endoscopic palliation because of more durable intestinal patency rates,⁶ despite metal stent placement having better short-term outcomes and being more cost efficient.⁷ In addition, literature supports biliodigestive bypass at exploration even in asymptomatic patients, because approximately 20% of them will develop obstruction at a later point.^8,9Endoscopically placed biliary and duodenal metal stents exhibit a geometric progress of evolution because of substantial improvements in manufacturing technology and materials.¹⁰ The fourth-generation metal stents used now in everyday practice are made of nitinol alloy and may be covered (partially or fully) with materials that improve patency rates.¹¹ In addition, biliary and duodenal stents may be used easily in combination for palliation of the same patient, without significant technical problems.¹² Furthermore, recent studies show that stent efficacy increases with synchronous use of chemotherapy or radiotherapy.¹³ Moreover, metal stents that release chemotherapeutic agents have started being used in clinical practice.¹⁴The aim of this study was to evaluate, in patients with unresectable obstructive pancreatic head adenocarcinoma, the efficacy of the newer endoscopic metal stents compared with the standard operative procedures.     

Perioperative Allogeneic Blood Transfusion Is Associated With Surgical Site Infection After Abdominoperineal Resection—a Space for the Implementation of Patient Blood Management Strategies

Allogeneic blood transfusion (ABT) has been reported as a major risk factor for surgical site infection (SSI) in patients undergoing colorectal surgery. However, the association of ABT with SSI in patients undergoing abdominoperineal resection (APR) and total pelvic exenteration (TPE) still remains to be evaluated. Here, we aim to elucidate this association. The medical records of all patients undergoing APR and TPE at our institution in the period between January 2000 and December 2012 were reviewed. Patients without SSI (no SSI group) were compared with patients who developed SSI (SSI group), in terms of clinicopathologic features, including ABT. In addition, data for 262 patients who underwent transabdominal rectal resection at our institution in the same period were also enrolled, and their data on differential leukocyte counts were evaluated. Multivariate analysis showed that intraoperative transfusion was an independent predictive factor for SSI after APR and TPE (P = 0.004). In addition, the first–operative day lymphocyte count of patients undergoing APR, TPE, and transabdominal rectal resection was significantly higher in nontransfusion patients compared with transfusion ones (P = 0.026). ABT in the perioperative period of APR and TPE may have an important immunomodulatory effect, leading to an increased incidence of SSI. This fact should be carefully considered, and efforts to avoid allogeneic blood exposure while still achieving adequate patient blood management would be very important for patients undergoing APR and TPE as well.Key words: Colorectal cancer, Abdominoperineal resection, Surgical site infection, Allogeneic blood transfusion, Patient blood managementPostoperative surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most frequent complications associated with various surgical procedures, and it results in adverse outcomes, including longer hospital stay, higher health care costs, and increased surgical mortality.¹ It is one of the most frequent nosocomial complications, accounting for almost one fifth of all health care–associated infections.² Colon surgery and rectal surgery are associated with higher SSI rates compared with most other abdominal procedures, with 5% to 25% of colon and rectal surgery patients developing incisional and organ/space SSI.^3–5 Moreover, the incidence of overall SSI was reported to be higher in rectal surgery patients (17%–28%) than in colonic surgery patients (9%–23%),^3,5,6 with especially higher overall SSI rates observed in patients undergoing abdominoperineal resection (APR; 12%–51%).^7–9 These are attributed to the high infection rates of the perineal wound, reported to be as high as 21%.¹⁰ Thus, the incidence of SSI associated with APR should be the highest among the various abdominal operative procedures.Various risk factors for postoperative SSI in colorectal surgery were reported previously. Open surgery,^10–12 perioperative allogeneic blood transfusion (ABT),^4,10,12 and prolonged operation time^4,9 have been found to be risk factors for SSI in a number of studies. Although several preceding reports have investigated the risk factors for SSI associated with APR, the reported independent risk factors varied among the studies. Although a number of studies have reported on the role of ABT as a strong risk factor for incisional SSI in colorectal surgery,^13,14 only one study has investigated on its relevance to the onset of incisional SSI after APR procedure; but this study failed to demonstrate a significant association. Presently, therefore, the role of ABT as a potential risk factor for incisional SSI in APR remains to be elucidated, and doing so will be very important for the implementation of measures to achieve patient blood management in this group of patients.In this study, we aimed to elucidate the risk factors for SSI in patients receiving APR, especially focusing on ABT.     

Impact of Glissonean Pedicle Approach for Centrally Located Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Mongolia

Approaches to surgical resection of centrally located HCC remain controversial. Traditionally, hemi- or extended hepatectomy is suggested. However, it carries a high risk of postoperative complications in patients with cirrhosis. An alternative approach is Glissonean pedicle transection method. This study was conducted to assess the surgical and survival outcomes associated with central liver resection using the Glissonean pedicle transection. Sixty-nine patients with centrally located HCC were studied retrospectively. They were divided into conventional approach group with hemi- or extended hepatectomy, and Glissonean approach group with multisegmental central liver resection using the Glissonean pedicle transection. Glissonean pedicle transection method has comparable or superior surgical and survival outcomes to conventional hemi- or extended hepatectomy with regard to intraoperative bleeding, complications, hospital stay, and postoperative mortality and survival outcomes in patients with centrally located HCC. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates of the conventional approach group were 74%, 64%, and 55% respectively. For the Glissonean approach group, the 1 and 3-year overall survival rates were 86% and 61%, respectively. Glissonean pedicle transection method is a safe and effective surgical procedure in patients with centrally located HCC.Key words: Centrally located HCC, Glissonean approach, Glissonean pedicle transection, Central hepatectomyHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the first leading cause of cancer-related mortality in both men and women in Mongolia, and its incidence is among the highest worldwide.¹ Surgical resection remains the first-line therapeutic strategy for HCC despite recent advancements in treatment modalities.^2-4 However, underlying liver diseases significantly limit the number of HCC patients eligible for surgical resection. This is especially problematic, where the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B and C is over 10% in the general population, and 86.8% of HCC patients have cirrhosis.⁵ Therefore, refining surgical techniques to preserve as much liver parenchyma as possible could potentially improve treatment prospects for cirrhotic HCC patients, particularly in cases when the tumor is centrally located.Traditionally, hemi- or extended hepatectomy is suggested for the treatment of centrally located HCC.⁶ However, such a major hepatic resection sacrifices a large volume of noncancerous liver parenchyma, which carries a high risk of postoperative liver failure in patients with cirrhotic background.^6-8 Preservation of functioning liver parenchyma to a maximum extent possible is crucial to avoid postoperative liver failure in cirrhotic patients. Therefore, Glissonean pedicle transection method is increasingly considered as an effective alternative to hemi- or extended hepatectomies in such cases.^9-16 Nonetheless, multisegmental central liver resection has not been widely used since its introduction for gallbladder cancer in 1972.^17,18 Conventional central liver resection method is technically demanding, and may require prolonged surgical time in order to dissect and confirm each branch of hepatic artery, portal vein, and bile duct to the anterior section.^19,20 This often results in increased risk of bleeding, bile leakage or parenchymal necrosis, and therefore, central liver resection particularly in cirrhotic patients remains controversial.^21,22 The answer to the dilemma could lie with the Glissonean pedicle transection method, which was introduced in the mid-1980s owing to a better understanding of the surgical anatomy of the liver.^20,23 When using this resection method, Glissonean pedicle supplying the target area is ligated and divided at the hepatic hilum prior to resection without exposing the vessels individually.²³ This simplifies hepatic resection, shortens operation time and reduces intraoperative bleeding.²³⁻²⁵ Our previous experience with using this method for hemihepatectomy has resulted in considerable reduction of blood loss during resection, a major determinant of patient outcome.This approach has allowed the ability to adapt the size of resection to the extent of the tumor and to preserve the maximum amount of liver parenchyma, which is crucial for the prevention of postoperative liver failure especially in patients with cirrhotic background. However, it remains unclear whether central liver resection using the Glissonean pedicle transection improves long-term survival. Therefore, the current retrospective study of patients with centrally located HCC, who underwent either hemi- or extended hepatectomy or multisegmental central liver resection, was conducted to assess the perioperative and long-term outcomes associated with central liver resection using the Glissonean pedicle transection.     

Seminal Vesicle-Rectal Fistula Secondary to Anastomotic Leakage After Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer: A Case Report and Brief Literature Review

We report a case of a patient with seminal vesicle-rectal fistula, an extremely rare complication of low anterior resection of the rectum. A 53-year-old man with rectal adenocarcinoma underwent low anterior resection in our hospital. The patient experienced diarrhea, pneumaturia, and low-grade fever on postoperative day 13. A computed tomography scan showed emphysema in the right seminal vesicle. We concluded that anastomotic leakage induced a seminal vesicle-rectal fistula. The patient underwent conservative therapy with total parenteral nutrition and oral intake of metronidazole. Diarrhea and pneumaturia rapidly improved after metronidazole administration and the patient was successfully cured without invasive therapy such as colostomy or surgical drainage. A seminal vesicle-rectal fistula is a rare complication of low anterior resection, and therapeutic strategies for this condition remain elusive. Our report provides valuable information on the successful conservative treatment of a secondary seminal vesicle-rectal fistula that developed after low anterior resection of the rectum in a patient.Key words: Seminal vesicle-rectal fistula, low anterior resection, rectal cancerSeminal vesicle-rectal fistula is a rarely encountered complication in patients. The reported causes of this condition are Crohn''s disease,^1,2 diverticulitis,^3–6 operative complications of the prostate,^7,8 direct invasion of rectal cancer,⁹ congenital anomalies,¹⁰ iatrogenic perforation by transrectal aspiration or seminal vesicle abcess,¹¹ secondary vesiculitis,¹² and anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection (LAR) of the rectum.^2,13–18 We could find only 9 reported cases of seminal vesicle-rectal fistula after LAR in the PubMed database.Here, we present a case of a seminal vesicle-rectal fistula that developed after LAR in a patient and review the clinical manifestation, radiographic findings, and treatment procedure for this condition.     

Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma With Lymphoepithelioma-like Carcinoma Components Not Associated With Epstein-Barr Virus: Report of a Case

A carcinoma displaying undifferentiated features with dense lymphoplasmacytic infiltration is defined as lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma (LELC). Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) with LELC components is rare, and most LELCs are associated with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). We report here on a case of ICC with LELC components not associated with EBV. A 65-year-old woman was incidentally found to have a hepatic tumor in the caudate lobe. An extended right hepatectomy with lymphadenectomy was performed. Histologically, the tumor was mainly composed of large undifferentiated epithelial cells with vesicular nuclei, prominent nucleoli, indistinct cell borders, and heavy small lymphocytic infiltration, which are the characteristic features of LELC. Immunohistochemical studies revealed that the tumor cells were positive for cytokeratin 19 but were negative for glypican 3. In situ hybridization using EBV-encoded RNA was negative. Therefore, a diagnosis of ICC with LELC components not associated with EBV was made. Because there is limited information available regarding the prognosis and treatment of ICC with LELC components because of the limited number of reported cases, additional studies will be needed to clarify the clinicopathologic features of this disease.Key words: Lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma, Cholangiocarcinoma, Epstein-Barr virus, LiverLymphoepithelioma-like carcinomas (LELCs) are tumors that are composed of undifferentiated carcinoma with an intense lymphocytic infiltrate, and they have histomorphologic features identical to those of undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinomas. These tumors have been reported in various anatomic sites, such as the stomach, salivary gland, and thymus.¹ The occurrence of LELC in the hepatobiliary tract is rare. Most LELCs have been reported to be associated with the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV).^1–4 To the best of our knowledge, only 6 cases of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) with LELC components not associated with EBV infection have been reported,^5–10 and only 2 cases with lymph node metastases at the time of surgery have been reported.^5,9 In this paper, we report on an unusual case of an ICC with LELC components accompanied by lymph node metastases not associated with EBV infection.     

Pneumoretroperitoneum and Pneumomediastinum Revealing a Left Colon Perforation

Left colon perforation usually occurs in complicated diverticulitis or cancer. The most frequent signs are intraperitoneal abscess or peritonitis. In cases of retroperitoneal colonic perforation, diagnosis may be difficult. A 59-year-old woman presented with left thigh pain and with abdominal discomfort associated with mild dyspnea. Computed tomography scan showed air bubbles and purulent collection in the retroperitoneum, with subcutaneous emphysema extending from the left thigh to the neck. Computed tomography scan also revealed portal vein gas and thrombosis with multiple liver abscesses. An emergency laparotomy revealed a perforation of the proximal left colon. No masses were found. A left colectomy was performed. The retroperitoneum was drained and washed extensively. A negative pressure wound therapy was applied. A second-look laparotomy was performed 48 hours later. The retroperitoneum was drained and an end colostomy was performed. Intensive Care Unit postoperative stay was 9 days, and the patient was discharged on the 32nd postoperative day. Pneumoretroperitoneum and pneumomediastinum are rare signs of colonic retroperitoneal perforation. The diagnosis may be delayed, especially in the absence of peritoneal irritation. Clinical, laboratory, and especially radiologic parameters might be useful. Surgical treatment must be prompt to improve prognosis.Key words: Pneumomediastinum, Retroperitoneum, Colonic, PerforationColonic perforation can be caused by either benign or malignant diseases. Left colon perforation is generally due to diverticular disease or cancer.^1–3 Uncommon causes are iatrogenic ischemia, colonic ischemia, trauma, or toxic megacolon.^1,3,4 Symptoms are usually due to abscesses or peritonitis. However, retroperitoneal ruptures can be difficult to diagnose because their presentation can vary widely.^1,2,4–6Through this case of retroperitoneal colonic perforation we aim to describe the presentation and therapeutic management of this entity.     

Gallstone Ileus With Jejunum Perforation Managed With Laparoscopic-Assisted Surgery: Rare Case Report and Minimal Invasive Management

Gallstone ileus is an uncommon complication of cholelithiasis. Most patients affected by gallstone ileus are elderly and have multiple comorbidities. Symptoms are vague and insidious, which may delay the correct diagnosis for days. Here we are reporting an uncommon complication of gallstone ileus. We report on a 70-year-old man with small bowel obstruction at the jejunum due to an impacted stone, which led to necrosis and perforation of the proximal bowel wall. Laparoscope-assisted small bowel resection with enterolithotomy was used to successfully treat the patient''s perforation and obstruction. His recovery was uneventful. Gallstone ileus commonly presents with bowel obstruction, but intestinal perforation occurs very rarely. A laparoscopic approach can provide both diagnostic and therapeutic roles in management.Key words: Gallstone ileus, Jejunal perforation, Laparoscopic surgery, Intestinal obstructionGallstone ileus is characterized by intestinal obstruction due to intraluminal impaction of one or more gallstones. It is an uncommon but serious complication of cholelithiasis and accounts for 1% to 3% of cases of patients who undergo surgery for bowel obstruction.^1,2 A cholecystoduodenal fistula is the most common tract.³ Most patients are elderly and female, and the average age range is 65 to 75 years. In spite of treatment, the mortality rate ranges from 10% to 20%.^4,5Gallstone ileus with proximal small bowel perforation is rare, and fewer than 10 cases have been reported in the medical literature.⁶ We describe a case of gallstone ileus with jejunum perforation that was successfully treated with laparoscopically assisted surgery.     

Usefulness of Intraoperative Observation Using a Fluorescence Imaging Instrument for Patients With Nonocclusive Mesenteric Ischemia

The authors evaluated the usefulness of intraoperative photodynamic eye (PDE) observation in patients with nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia (NOMI). Between February 2012 and July 2013, 6 patients who had undergone emergency surgery for NOMI were enrolled. Intraoperative PDE observation was performed to decide the adequate length of bowel resection including all skipped dark spots, which could not be detected as ongoing mucosal ischemic changes under visible light observation. All ongoing mucosal ischemic changes were easily detected as dark spots using PDE observation in all 6 patients. The mean length of adequate ileal resection (92 ± 48 cm) was significantly longer than that of ischemic ileum (85 ± 50 cm) (mean ± SD) (P = 0.043). After resection of an adequate length of bowel, all the patients had a good course until discharge without incidents due to residual bowel ischemia, except for 1patient who died. PDE observation is useful for deciding the adequate length of bowel to resect, including ongoing mucosal ischemic changes that cannot be detected under visible light observation. In patients with NOMI, resection of an adequate length of bowel is necessary to prevent postoperative incidents due to residual bowel ischemia.Key words: Dark spot, Fluorescence, Indocyanine green, Nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia, Photodynamic eyeNumerous studies have provided evidence for the usefulness of imaging-guided surgery. The photodynamic eye (PDE), in particular, can clearly reveal bile flow¹ and blood flow^2,3 by highly sensitive fluorescence imaging after intravenous injection of indocyanine green (ICG). In fact, PDE has a wide range of surgical applications, such as sentinel lymph node navigation surgery in patients with breast cancer,^4,5 detection of the biliary tract in hepato-biliary surgery,¹ evaluation of blood flow through vascular anastomoses in cardiovascular surgery⁶ and detection of chyle fistula after esophagectomy,⁷Nonocclusive mesenteric ischemia (NOMI) is a life-threatening condition that requires emergency surgery.⁸ In patients with NOMI, necrotic changes in the bowel may progress, even if mesenteric arterial blood flow is not obstructed. Therefore, the ongoing ischemic changes that spread from the mucosa to the serosa are difficult to detect by extra-luminal observation alone. In order to prevent postoperative incidents related to residual bowel ischemia, it is necessary to resect an adequate length of bowel that includes all ongoing mucosal ischemic changes.Although there are several studies which reported the usefulness of fluorescein fluorescence for NOMI patients,^9,10 a recent report has described the use of new color CCD camera system, known as the HyperEye Medical System (HEMS, Mizuho Co, Ltd, Sakura, Japan), which can simultaneously detect color and near-infrared rays under room light, allowing precise intraoperative evaluation of mesenteric and bowel circulation for a NOMI patient.¹¹ And the report demonstrated that fluorescence was not observed in infarctions in several segments of the bowel wall. However, the ability of PDE for diagnosing NOMI remained unclarified.Accordingly, we hypothesized that if all such infarctions could be included in the length of bowel resected, there would be no postoperative incidents associated with residual bowel ischemia. Therefore, PDE observation would be useful for determining the adequate length of bowel that should be resected.In order to test this hypothesis, therefore, we performed intraoperative observation using PDE in patients with NOMI and investigated the resulting postoperative outcomes.     

Recurrence-Free Survival of a Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patient With Tumor Thrombosis of the Inferior Vena Cava After Treatment With Sorafenib and Hepatic Resection

Sorafenib (Nexabar, Bayer, Berlin, Germany), one of multikinase inhibitors, can infrequently downstage advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). There are some reports that sorafenib in combination with other modalities, such as transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) or radiation therapy, could represent a bridge to surgery. We have observed a progressive HCC case with hepatic vein tumor thrombosis proceeding to the inferior vena cava (IVC-HVTT) convert to a state of feasible curative resection after a multidisciplinary treatment which included sorafenib. The patient underwent a successful resection in consequence of this therapy. A 45-year-old male with Hepatitis B Virus-associated chronic hepatitis was diagnosed as HCC with IVC-HVTT. To obtain oncological curative resection, we performed TACE, radiation therapy followed by administration of sorafenib (800 mg per day, total 72 g). The tumor including IVC-HVTT remarkably shrank, therefore, an extended posterior sectionectomy and total removal of the IVC-HVTT was successfully performed. The operation time was 736 minutes and the amount of intraoperative hemorrhage was 805 mL. No postoperative complication occurred. Adjuvant therapy with sorafenib was started four weeks after the operation and continued for 6 months (800 mg per day, total 144 g). The patient is alive without recurrence for about 4 years from the initial therapy. Multidisciplinary therapy including sorafenib, TACE, radiation, and hepatic resection may be an effective strategy to treat HCC patients with IVC-HVTT.Key words: Hepatocellular carcinoma, Hepatic vein tumor thrombosis, Sorafenib trans-arterial chemoembolization, Hepatic resectionHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with major hepatic vein tumor thrombosis proceeding to the inferior vena cava (IVC-HVTT) is a serious condition that can cause distant metastases or lethal pulmonary embolism.^1–3 Straightforward hepatectomy for such HCC patients often causes pulmonary metastases in early postoperative period and its prognosis is quite poor.^4–6 Therefore effective perioperative therapy has been required.⁷We have already demonstrated the high tumor response of 3D conformal radiation therapy for patients with tumor thrombosis in major portal vein (PVTT) or IVC-HVTT.^8,9 Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been a useful but palliative modality for HCC with excessive tumor thrombosis.¹⁰ Sorafenib (Nexavar, Bayer, Berlin, Germany) is a molecular-targeted drug used in palliative treatment of advanced HCC patients in Child A and good performance status.^11,12 Although sorafenib monotherapy is effective for progressive HCC (extrahepatic spread or major vascular invasion), the radiologic response is not satisfactory.We herein report a HCC patient with IVC-HVTT who was treated with multidisciplinary therapy, including hepatic resection and pre- and postoperative sorafenib administration.     

Prevention of Incisional Surgical Site Infection Using a Subcuticular Absorbable Suture in Elective Surgery for Gastrointestinal Cancer

This study examined whether subcuticular absorbable sutures actually reduce incisional SSI in patients undergoing surgery for gastrointestinal (GI) cancer. Surgical site infection (SSI) is still a source of major complications in digestive tract surgery. Reportedly, incisional SSI can be reduced using subcuticular suturing. We performed subcuticular suturing using a 4-0 absorbable monofilament in patients undergoing elective surgery for GI cancer beginning in 2008. Using an interrupted technique, sutures were placed 1.5-2.0cm from the edge of the wound, with everted subcuticular sutures created at intervals of 1.5-2.0cm. The control group consisted of cases in which the common subcutaneous suture method using clip. One hundred cases were examined in the subcuticular group. The incidence of SSI was 0% in the subcuticular suture group, compared with 13.9% in the control group; this difference was significant. Incisional SSI can be prevented using the devised subcuticular absorbable sutures in patients undergoing elective surgery for GI cancer.Key words: Surgical site infection, Subcuticular suture, Absorbable monofilament, Gastrointestinal cancer surgerySurgical site infection (SSI) is still a source of major complications in digestive tract surgery. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance System (NNIS) risk adjustment index is an internationally recognized method of stratifying the risk of SSI according to three major factors.¹ First, the American Society of Anesthesiologists'' score reflects the patient''s state of health before surgery.² Second, the wound classification reflects the degree of wound contamination. And third, the duration of the operation reflects the technical aspects of surgery. The infection rate increases with an increasing risk index score.^1,3 Excellent surgical technique is widely believed to reduce the risk of SSI.^4–7 In the case of wound closure, such techniques include the maintenance of effective hemostasis while preserving an adequate blood supply, preventing hypothermia, gently handling the tissues, avoiding inadvertent entries into a hollow viscus, removing devitalized (e.g., necrotic or charred) tissues, the appropriate use of drains and suture materials, the eradication of dead space, and the appropriate postoperative management of incisions. Hematoma at the site of a surgical wound is a relatively common complication in elective surgical procedures. In most cases, the hematoma is caused by incomplete preoperative hemostasis, and not the omission of a subcutaneous fat layer suture.^1,8 According to current knowledge, seroma formation is caused by the ultrafiltration of blood serum, lymphatic secretion, the fibrinolytic activity of plasmin (causing the decay of fibrin complexes in the surrounding injured vessels), and tissue exudate formed during early inflammation reactions.^3,9,10 A large dead space also appears to contribute to the formation or a seroma.³ According to some authors, the presence of suturing material (as extraneous material) in tissues can also increase the risk of surgical site infections.^11–13Subcuticular suturing was recently reported to reduce incisional SSI.^14–16 Subcuticular sutures are thought to enable a maintained blood supply and to eradicate dead space in the subcutaneous environment. Therefore, we investigated whether the devised subcuticular suturing actually reduces incisional SSI, compared with the common subcutaneous sutures with clip, in patients undergoing elective surgery for gastrointestinal cancer.