Randomized phase II study of nab‐paclitaxel as first‐line chemotherapy in patients with HER2‐negative metastatic breast cancer

Weekly administration of nanoparticle albumin‐bound paclitaxel (nab‐paclitaxel) has been shown to be a safe and effective treatment for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in clinical studies. We conducted a multicenter, randomized, open‐label phase II study to compare the efficacy and safety of weekly nab‐paclitaxel and docetaxel in Japanese patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2‐negative MBC. The primary endpoint was progression‐free survival (PFS). Patients were randomized to receive nab‐paclitaxel (150 mg/m² nab‐paclitaxel once per week for 3 of 4 weeks; n = 100) or docetaxel (75 mg/m² docetaxel every 3 weeks; n = 100). The median PFS by independent radiologist assessment was 9.8 months (90% confidence interval [CI]: 8.5–11.2) for nab‐paclitaxel and 11.2 months (90% CI: 8.4–13.8) for docetaxel (hazard ratio: 1.25, P = 0.363), and the median overall survival was 42.4 months and 34.0 months, respectively. The overall response rate was 56.1% for nab‐paclitaxel and 52.5% for docetaxel. Adverse events in both treatment arms were similar to previous reports. Neutropenia was the most common adverse event in both arms, with 35.0% of patients in the nab‐paclitaxel arm and 89.0% in the docetaxel arm experiencing grade 4 neutropenia. Grade 3 peripheral sensory neuropathy occurred in 22.0% of patients in the nab‐paclitaxel and 5.0% in the docetaxel arm. In this study, although weekly nab‐paclitaxel 150 mg/m² did not show superiority in PFS compared with docetaxel, efficacy outcomes were similar in patients treated with weekly nab‐paclitaxel and docetaxel.     

Adjuvant dose-dense doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide followed by dose-dense <Emphasis Type="Italic">nab</Emphasis>-paclitaxel is safe in women with early-stage breast cancer: a pilot study

Every-2-week (dose-dense) adjuvant doxorubicin (A) plus cyclophosphamide (C) followed by paclitaxel is a safe and effective adjuvant chemotherapy regimen. Every-3-week nab-paclitaxel is safe and more effective at 50% higher dose than every-3-week paclitaxel in metastatic breast cancer (BC). This study evaluated the safety of adjuvant dose-dense AC followed by dose-dense nab-paclitaxel for early-stage BC. Women with operable, histologically confirmed BC received four cycles of dose-dense A 60 mg/m² plus C 600 mg/m² with pegfilgrastim, followed by dose-dense 260 mg/m² nab-paclitaxel (with pegfilgrastim given as needed). Endpoints were adverse events (AEs), including myelosuppression. Patients with neuropathy were followed until symptom improvement to grade ≤1. Thirty women received four cycles of dose-dense AC with no unanticipated AEs, one withdrew after AC therapy. Of 29 women who began nab-paclitaxel therapy, 27 received all the four doses (mean cumulative dose, 959 mg/m²); one discontinued nab-paclitaxel after two doses due to unacceptable AEs. Four patients had a grade 3 nab-paclitaxel-related neuropathy (no grade 4 event). Of 29 patients, 34% received pegfilgrastim during nab-paclitaxel therapy and 31% had a nab-paclitaxel treatment delay, mainly due to hematologic toxicity. Based on the Kaplan–Meier probability estimates, the percentage of patients having ≤1 grade neuropathy at the end of treatment, 2, and 8 months after treatment were 59, 79, and 97%. Administering adjuvant dose-dense AC followed by 260 mg/m² dose-dense nab-paclitaxel was feasible in women with early-stage BC, with manageable AEs. Most patients had ≤1 grade neuropathy 2 months after treatment completion.     

A phase 2 clinical trial of nab‐paclitaxel in previously treated and chemotherapy‐naive patients with metastatic melanoma

BACKGROUND:

nab‐Paclitaxel (ABI‐007, Abraxane), a 130‐nM, albumin‐bound (nab) particle form of Cremophor‐free paclitaxel, is approved for metastatic breast cancer. In the current study, the efficacy and safety of nab‐paclitaxel were evaluated in previously treated and chemotherapy‐naive patients with metastatic melanoma (MM).

METHODS:

Patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed, measurable MM were enrolled. nab‐Paclitaxel was administered intravenously weekly for 3 of 4 weeks at a dose of 100 mg/m² (in previously treated patients) or 150 mg/m² (in chemotherapy‐naive patients).

RESULTS:

Thirty‐seven patients were treated in each cohort. The response rate was 2.7% in the previously treated cohort and 21.6% in the chemotherapy‐naive cohort; the response plus stable disease rate was 37.8% and 48.6% in the previously treated and chemotherapy‐naive cohorts, respectively. The median progression‐free survival (PFS) was 3.5 months and 4.5 months, and the median survival was 12.1 months and 9.6 months, respectively. The probability of being alive and free of disease progression at 6 months was 27% for the previously treated cohort and 34% for the chemotherapy‐naive cohort; the probability of surviving 1 year was 49% and 41%, respectively, for the previously treated and chemotherapy‐naive cohorts. Approximately 78% of the previously treated patients and 49% of the chemotherapy‐naive patients were treated without dose reduction. Eight (22%) chemotherapy‐naive patients discontinued therapy because of toxicities. Drug‐related toxicities included grade 3 to 4 (graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [version 3.0]) neuropathy, alopecia, neutropenia, and fatigue.

CONCLUSIONS:

nab‐Paclitaxel was found to be well tolerated and demonstrated activity in both previously treated and chemotherapy‐naive patients with MM. The response rate, PFS, and survival compared favorably with current standard dacarbazine therapy and combination therapies for melanoma. nab‐Paclitaxel therapy of MM should be investigated further in controlled clinical trials. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

A pilot study of adjuvant nanoparticle albumin-bound (<Emphasis Type="Italic">nab</Emphasis>) paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide,with trastuzumab in HER2-positive patients,in the treatment of early-stage breast cancer

nab-Paclitaxel has shown favorable efficacy and toxicity profiles compared to other taxanes in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. In this pilot trial, we evaluated a nab-paclitaxel-containing adjuvant regimen in patients with early stage breast cancer. Patients with node-positive or high-risk node-negative early-stage breast cancer were eligible following completion of standard primary therapy. All the patients received four cycles, at 21-day intervals, of nab-paclitaxel (100 mg/m² IV days 1, 8, and 15) and cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m² IV day 1). HER2-positive patients also received trastuzumab 8 mg/kg IV on cycle 1 day 1, followed by 6 mg/kg every 21 days for a total of 52 weeks. The purpose of this trial was to evaluate feasibility and toxicity of this nab-paclitaxel-containing adjuvant regimen. 62 patients were treated between 2/08 and 11/08. The majority of the patients (87%) were HER2-negative. This adjuvant regimen was well tolerated, and full doses of all agents were administered in >90% of cycles. Grade 3/4 neutropenia occurred in 53% of the patients; however, only one episode of febrile neutropenia occurred in a total of 249 cycles administered. Other grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in less than 5% of patients. After short follow-up, all the patients remain alive and disease-free. The combination of nab-paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide, with or without trastuzumab, is feasible and well tolerated in patients with early stage breast cancer. Further investigation of the role of nab-paclitaxel in adjuvant breast cancer therapy is indicated, but definitive evaluation will require randomized phase III trials.     

Phase II trial of nanoparticle albumin‐bound paclitaxel as second‐line chemotherapy for unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer

This multicenter phase II study first investigated the efficacy and safety of nanoparticle albumin‐bound paclitaxel (nab‐paclitaxel) when given every 3 weeks to patients with unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer who had received a prior round of fluoropyrimidine‐containing chemotherapy. Patients with unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer who experienced progression despite fluoropyrimidine‐containing treatment were studied. Nab‐paclitaxel was given i.v. at 260 mg/m² on day 1 of each 21‐day cycle without anti‐allergic premedication until disease progression or study discontinuation. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate. The secondary endpoints were the disease control rate, progression‐free survival, overall survival, and safety. From April 2008 to July 2010, 56 patients were enrolled, 55 patients received the study treatment, and 54 patients were evaluable for responses. According to an independent review committee, the overall response rate was 27.8% (15/54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 16.5–41.6) and the disease control rate was 59.3% (32/54; 95% CI, 45.0–72.4). One patient had a complete response. The median progression‐free survival and overall survival were 2.9 months (95% CI, 2.4–3.6) and 9.2 months (95% CI, 6.9–11.4), respectively. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia (49.1%), leucopenia (20.0%), lymphopenia (10.9%), and peripheral sensory neuropathy (23.6%). There were no treatment‐related deaths. Nab‐paclitaxel, given every 3 weeks, showed promising activity against previously treated unresectable or recurrent gastric cancers, with well‐tolerated toxicities. (Trial registration, ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00661167).     

A phase I study of S-1 in combination with <Emphasis Type="Italic">nab</Emphasis>-paclitaxel in patients with unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer

Background

In Japan, S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine, plus cisplatin is a standard regimen for advanced gastric cancer, whereas nab-paclitaxel is a treatment option. We aimed to evaluate the tolerance, pharmacokinetics, safety, and clinical efficacy of S-1 combined with nab-paclitaxel in patients with advanced gastric cancer in a phase 1 study.

Methods

The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) of S-1 plus nab-paclitaxel. The study was designed in accordance with a standard 3 + 3 method. Patients received 3-week cycles of treatment. S-1 was administered orally at 80 mg/m² twice daily for 14 days, and nab-paclitaxel was administered as an intravenous infusion at 180, 220, or 260 mg/m² on day 1 or 8.

Results

Among the 16 patients enrolled, dose-limiting toxicity was observed in one patient at level 2a (S-1 80 mg/m² twice daily plus nab-paclitaxel 220 mg/m² on day 1). The MTD was not obtained, but the RD was established as level 3a (S-1 80 mg/m² twice daily plus nab-paclitaxel 260 mg/m² on day 1). The most common grade 3–4 toxicity was neutropenia (62.5 %). The overall response rate was 54.5 %. The pharmacokinetic profiles of coadministered S-1 and paclitaxel were comparable to those of nab-paclitaxel or S-1 alone.

Conclusions

Based on the present results, the RD was determined as level 3a (S-1 80 mg/m² twice daily plus nab-paclitaxel 260 mg/m² on day 1). This combination therapy was well tolerated and showed antitumor efficacy in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

     

A phase 2 trial of induction nab‐paclitaxel and cetuximab given with cisplatin and 5‐fluorouracil followed by concurrent cisplatin and radiation for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

BACKGROUND:

Complete response (CR) at the primary tumor site as assessed by clinical examination following induction chemotherapy with PF (cisp latin and 5‐f luorouracil [5‐FU]) is a favorable predictive factor for overall survival and disease control in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. In most series, the rate of CR at the primary site after induction PF was 20% to 30%. This study evaluated the efficacy and feasibility of induction na b‐paclitaxel and c etuximab given with PF (ACPF) followed by definitive chemoradiation (CRT) in a phase 2 trial.

METHODS:

Patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were treated with ACPF (nab‐paclitaxel 100 mg/m²/week; cetuximab 250 mg/m²/week; cisplatin 75 mg/m² on day 1; 5‐FU 750 mg/m²/day on days 1 through 3) every 21 days for 3 cycles followed by CRT (cisplatin 100 mg/m² on days 1, 22, and 43 of radiation therapy [RT]). CR at the primary tumor site after 2 cycles of ACPF was the primary endpoint.

RESULTS:

Thirty patients were enrolled, of which 22 (73%) had large (T3/T4) primary tumors. The CR rate at the primary tumor site after 2 cycles of ACPF was 53% and the overall response rate was 100%. Twenty‐nine (96%) patients completed 3 cycles of ACPF, 26 (90%) completed definitive RT per protocol, and 22 of the 27 evaluable patients (81%) received > 2 of the 3 planned doses of cisplatin with RT. The estimated 2‐year overall and progression‐free survival rates were 84% and 65%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

Induction ACPF resulted in a high CR rate (53%) at the primary tumor site even in large tumors and did not adversely affect delivery of definitive CRT. Further investigation of ACPF is warranted. Cancer 2013. © 2012 American Cancer Society.     

A randomized phase 2 study of temozolomide and bevacizumab or nab‐paclitaxel,carboplatin, and bevacizumab in patients with unresectable stage IV melanoma

BACKGROUND:

Increasing evidence shows chemotherapy in combination with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibition is a clinically active therapy for patients with metastatic melanoma (MM).

METHODS:

A phase 2 trial was conducted in chemotherapy‐naive patients with unresectable stage IV MM who were randomized to temozolomide (200 mg/m² on days 1 through 5) and bevacizumab (10 mg/kg intravenously on days 1 and 15) every 28 days (Regimen TB) or nab‐paclitaxel (100 mg/m², or 80 mg/m² post‐addendum 5 secondary to toxicity, on days 1, 8, and 15), bevacizumab (10 mg/kg on days 1 and 15), and carboplatin (area under the curve [AUC] 6 on day 1, or AUC 5 post‐addendum 5) every 28 days (Regimen ABC). Accrual goal was 41 patients per regimen. The primary aim of this study was to estimate progression‐free survival rate at 6 months (PFS6) in each regimen. A regimen would be considered promising if its PFS6 rate was > 60%.

RESULTS:

Ninety‐three eligible patients (42 TB and 51 ABC) were enrolled. The majority of patients had M1c disease (20 TB and 26 ABC). The median PFS and overall survival times with ABC were 6.7 months and 13.9 months, respectively. Median PFS time and median overall survival with TB were 3.8 months and 12.3 months, respectively. The most common severe toxicities (≥ grade 3) in both regimens were cytopenias, fatigue, and thrombosis. Among the first 41 patients enrolled onto each regimen, PFS6 rate was 32.8% (95% confidence interval: 21.1%‐51.2%) for TB and 56.1% (90% confidence interval: 44.7%‐70.4%) for ABC.

CONCLUSIONS:

The addition of bevacizumab to nab‐paclitaxel and carboplatin shows promising activity despite tolerability issues. Cancer 2013. © 2012 American Cancer Society.     

<Emphasis Type="Italic">nab</Emphasis>-Paclitaxel weekly or every 3 weeks compared to standard docetaxel as first-line therapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer: an economic analysis of a prospective randomized trial

Docetaxel is an effective therapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and considered a first-line standard of care in many jurisdictions. However, it may be associated with dose-limiting toxicity often requiring dose reductions, delays and in some cases prophylactic hematopoietic growth factors. A nanoparticle albumin-bound (nab) formulation of paclitaxel was developed to overcome the safety drawbacks of solvent-based taxanes and to improve efficacy. A randomized phase II trial comparing nab-paclitaxel 100 or 150 mg/m² weekly 3 out of 4 weeks and nab-paclitaxel 300 mg/m² every-3-week (q3w) to docetaxel 100 mg/m² q3w reported improved progression-free survival (PFS) and reduced toxicity with the former regimens. From resource use captured during the trial, an economic analysis from the perspective of the United Kingdom (UK) National Health Service was conducted. Resource use data contained within the trial database were converted to UK costs. These consisted of costs for chemotherapy, drug delivery, monitoring, supportive care drugs and hospitalization due to toxicity. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were then conducted to compare the total cost of therapy in patients randomized to each of the four regimens. Growth factor use, hospitalization due to side effects and toxicity-induced protocol discontinuations were higher in the docetaxel group. When all of the cost components were combined for the entire population (N = 300), patients in the nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m² weekly and 300 mg/m² q3w groups had comparable average costs to the docetaxel arm (￡15,396 vs. ￡15,809 vs. ￡12,923; P = NS). The nab-paclitaxel 150 mg/m² weekly arm had significantly higher overall costs of ￡27,222 per patient but had a significant improvement in PFS compared to docetaxel. Relative to docetaxel, the incremental costs per progression-free year gained with nab-paclitaxel 100, 150 mg/m² weekly and 300 mg/m² q3w were ￡5,600, ￡31,800 and ￡9,900, respectively. Given its improved safety profile, potentially enhanced efficacy and comparable economic impact, nab-paclitaxel (weekly or q3w) can be considered a reasonable alternative to docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy for MBC.     

nab‐Paclitaxel in Combination With Weekly Carboplatin With Concurrent Radiotherapy in Stage III Non‐Small Cell Lung Cancer

Lessons Learned

• The concomitant use of weekly nab-paclitaxel and carboplatin with concurrent radiotherapy was demonstrated to be a safe therapeutic approach in this phase I trial of 10 evaluable patients with stage III NSCLC.
• Despite the lack of systemic glucocorticoids, there were no reported infusion reactions or cases of peripheral neuropathy in this trial, both of which are known to occur with the use of paclitaxel.

Background.

Unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has a 5-year survival rate of 20%, and concurrent chemoradiotherapy results in significant toxicity with the use of current chemotherapeutic agents. nab-Paclitaxel was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in October 2012 for use along with carboplatin in advanced NSCLC. This study was undertaken to determine the maximum tolerated dose and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of weekly nab-paclitaxel given in combination with carboplatin and concurrent radiotherapy in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC.

Methods.

Escalating doses of once-weekly nab-paclitaxel were given along with once-weekly carboplatin area under the plasma concentration time curve (AUC) of 2 and concurrent radiotherapy 66 Gy in 33 fractions, followed by 2 cycles of carboplatin and nab-paclitaxel consolidation chemotherapy.

Results.

Eleven patients were enrolled and received treatment per protocol, with 10 evaluable for efficacy and toxicity. At dose level 1 (nab-paclitaxel 60 mg/m²), 2 DLTs were observed: esophagitis and radiation dermatitis. Six patients were enrolled at dose level 0 (nab-paclitaxel 40 mg/m²) with no DLTs. Nine of 10 evaluable patients had a partial response.

Conclusion.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with nab-paclitaxel 40 mg/m² and carboplatin AUC 2 is a safe and well-tolerated therapeutic regimen in patients with stage III NSCLC. A separate phase I/II study to evaluate the efficacy of this regimen is under way.     

Pharmacokinetic study of the oral fluorouracil antitumor agent S‐1 in patients with impaired renal function

Although dose reduction of S‐1 is recommended for patients with impaired renal function, dose modification for such patients has not been prospectively evaluated. The aim of the present study was to investigate the pharmacokinetic parameters of 5‐fluorouracil, 5‐chloro‐2,4 dihydroxypyridine and oteracil potassium, and to review the recommended dose modification of S‐1 in patients with renal impairment. We classified patients receiving S‐1 into 4 groups according to their renal function, as measured using the Japanese estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) equation. The daily S‐1 dose was adjusted based on the patient's eGFR and body surface area. Blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic analysis. A total of 33 patients were enrolled and classified into 4 groups as follows: 10 patients in cohort 1 (eGFR ≥ 80 mL/min/1.73 m²), 10 patients in cohort 2 (eGFR = 50‐79 mL/min/1.73 m²), 10 patients in cohort 3 (eGFR = 30‐49 mL/min/1.73 m²), and 3 patients in cohort 4 (eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m²). Those in cohorts 3 and 4 treated with an adjusted dose of S‐1 showed a similar area under the curve for 5‐fluorouracil (941.9 ± 275.6 and 1043.5 ± 224.8 ng/mL, respectively) compared with cohort 2 (1034.9 ± 414.3 ng/mL). Notably, while there was a statistically significant difference between cohort 1 (689.6 ± 208.8 ng/mL) and 2 (P = 0.0474) treated with an equal dose of S‐1, there was no significant difference observed in the toxicity profiles of the cohorts. In conclusion, dose adjustment of S‐1 in patients with impaired renal function using eGFR is appropriate and safe.     

Phase I/II trial of 2‐weekly docetaxel combined with cisplatin plus fluorouracil in metastatic esophageal cancer (JCOG0807)

We carried out a phase I/II trial of adding 2‐weekly docetaxel to cisplatin plus fluorouracil (CF) therapy (2‐weekly DCF regimen) in esophageal cancer patients to investigate its safety and antimetastatic activity. Patients received 2‐weekly docetaxel (30 mg/m² [dose level (DL)1] or 40 mg/m² [DL2] with a 3 + 3 design in phase I, on days 1 and 15) in combination with fixed‐dose CF (80 mg/m² cisplatin, day 1; 800 mg/m² fluorouracil, days 1–5) repeated every 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was dose‐limiting toxicity (DLT) in phase I and central peer review‐based response rate in phase II. At least 22 responders among 50 patients were required to satisfy the primary endpoint with a threshold of 35%. Sixty‐two patients were enrolled in phase I and II. In phase I, 10 patients were enrolled with DLT of 0/3 at DL1 and 2/7 in DL2. Considering DLT and treatment compliance, the recommended phase II dose was determined as DL1. In phase II, the response rate was 62% (P < 0.0001; 95% confidence interval, 48–75%); median overall survival and progression‐free survival were 11.1 and 5.8 months, respectively. Common grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (25%), anemia (36%), hyponatremia (29%), anorexia (24%), and nausea (11%). No febrile neutropenia was observed. Pneumonitis caused treatment‐related death in one patient. The 2‐weekly DCF regimen showed promising antimetastatic activity and tolerability. A phase III study comparing this regimen with CF therapy is planned by the Japan Clinical Oncology Group. This study was registered at the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN 000001737.     

Phase I/II trial of combination therapy with S-1 and weekly paclitaxel in patients with unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer

Purpose  We aimed to examine the safety and antitumor effects of a combination of S-1 and paclitaxel in patients with unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer in a phase I/II setting. Patients and methods  The study was designed as a phase I/II clinical trial. In phase I portion, the dose of paclitaxel was escalated to estimate the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) of paclitaxel with fixed dose of S-1. S-1 (daily dose, 80 mg/m²) was given orally on days 1–21 every 35-day cycle (rest on days 22–35). Paclitaxel was administered intravenously on days 1, 8 and 15, at an initial dose of 40 mg/m², stepping up to 70 mg/m² in 10-mg/m² increment. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade 4 hematological toxicity, grade 3 or higher nonhematological toxicity, and treatment discontinuation due to adverse reactions during the first course of treatment. In phase II portion, the efficacy and toxicity at the RD of paclitaxel with S-1 were assessed. Results  The MTD of paclitaxel was estimated to be 60 mg/m², because >33.3% of patients (2/3) developed DLTs. DLT included postponement of treatment due to grade 2 neutropenia, and grade 3 stomatitis, anorexia, and nausea. Therefore, the RD of paclitaxel was estimated to be 50 mg/m². In the phase II portion, 22 patients were evaluated with 50 mg/m² paclitaxel and 80 mg/m² S-1 in a 35-day cycle. The response rate was 54.5% (95% CI, 32.2–75.6%). The median survival time was 283 days (95% CI, 218–508 days). The median number of treatment courses was 4 (range 1–10), indicating that this regimen could be given repeatedly. Conclusions  This phase I/II trial of combination therapy with S-1 and paclitaxel in patients with unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer showed that this regimen has substantial antitumor activity and can be given safely.     

Phase I study of concurrent real-time tumor-tracking thoracic radiation therapy with paclitaxel and carboplatin in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Introduction

Although paclitaxel with carboplatin and thoracic radiotherapy has improved survival for patients with locally advanced unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the optimal dose of paclitaxel has not been well defined in Japan. This study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) of paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin and concurrent real-time tumor-tracking thoracic radiation therapy (thoracic RTRT).

Patients and methods

Previously untreated patients with histologically confirmed, locally advanced unresectable NSCLC were eligible. Before treatment, gold markers were inserted into the lung and the mediastinum of all patients. RTRT comprised a total of 66 Gy at 2 Gy/fraction, 5 days/week, for 7 weeks. Patients received paclitaxel at a starting dose of 40 mg/m² followed by carboplatin at a fixed area under the curve (AUC) of 2, as a weekly regimen with RTRT. The dose of paclitaxel was escalated by 5 mg/m² per level.

Results

Eight patients with locally advanced unresectable NSCLC were enrolled and treated with two dose levels of paclitaxel (40 mg/m² and 45 mg/m²), carboplatin (AUC = 2) and RTRT. No dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed at Level 1 (paclitaxel, 40 mg/m² and carboplatin, AUC = 2). At Level 2 (paclitaxel, 45 mg/m² and carboplatin, AUC = 2), two of five patients experienced DLTs, in the form of esophagitis and discontinuation of chemotherapy more than twice. The MTD and RD of paclitaxel were thus defined as 45 mg/m² and 40 mg/m², respectively.

Conclusions

This phase I study was well tolerated and the RD of paclitaxel and carboplatin with RTRT is 40 mg/m² at AUC = 2, respectively. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the efficacy of this regimen.     

Y90‐Ibritumomab tiuxetan (Y90‐IT) and high‐dose melphalan as conditioning regimen before autologous stem cell transplantation for elderly patients with lymphoma in relapse or resistant to chemotherapy: a feasibility trial (SAKK 37/05)

Standard conditioning regimens for autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) are often not tolerated by elderly patients, on one hand. Single high‐dose melphalan, on the other hand, has been shown to be safe and active as a pretransplant preparative regimen in elderly patients. Y⁹⁰‐Ibritumomab tiuxetan (Y⁹⁰‐IT) is well tolerated and feasible in the transplantation setting. We therefore investigated the combination of high‐dose melphalan and Y⁹⁰‐IT as a conditioning regimen for patients ≥65 years of age. Patients with relapsed or resistant CD20‐positive lymphoma in remission after salvage chemotherapy could be enrolled. High‐dose therapy consisted of standard dose Y⁹⁰‐IT (0.4‐mCi/kg body weight) followed by melphalan at escalating doses (100, 140, 170 and 200 mg/m²) and ASCT. The primary objective was to identify the maximum tolerated dose; secondary end points were complete response (CR) rate 100 days after transplantation and toxicity. Twenty patients (median age 72 years) were included. No DLT occurred at any dose level. Thirteen patients completed the treatment, 11 were evaluable for response. Seven patients did not complete treatment because of mobilization failure (n = 3), progressive disease (n = 2), worsening of cardiac function (n = 1), and grade 3 dyspnea (n = 1). Seven patients achieved a CR/complete remission/unconfirmed (CRu) and 2 had stable disease. Five out of 7 responding patients were still alive more than 3 years after transplantation. The 2 patients with SD had a long‐term survival of 3 and 5 years, respectively. Nonhematological grade 3 or higher treatment related adverse events (AEs) were infection (n = 6), including 2 cases of febrile neutropenia, diarrhea (n = 3), mucositis, anorexia, viral hepatitis, hypokalemia, dehydration, and multiorgan failure (n = 1 for each). The combination of Y⁹⁰‐IT and high‐dose melphalan is feasible before ASCT for elderly patients, with promising activity and manageable toxicity.     

Paclitaxel and gemcitabine combination in a biweekly schedule in patients with advanced non small-cell lung cancer: a phase i study

Purpose: This phase I study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) of the paclitaxel–gemcitabine combination in a biweekly schedule in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and methods: Treatment was administered on an outpatient basis every 2 weeks: paclitaxel over a 1-h IV infusion and gemcitabine as a 30-min IV infusion immediately following paclitaxel. Results: Twenty-nine patients were treated at six different dose levels, ranging from paclitaxel 135–175 mg/m² and gemcitabine 1,500–3,000 mg/m². A total of 198 cycles were administered (median 7, range 1–13). DLTs in the first two cycles were grade 4 neutropenia and myocardial ischemia at the dose level paclitaxel/gemcitabine 150/2,000 mg/m², febrile neutropenia and grade 4 neutropenia at the dose level paclitaxel/gemcitabine 175/2,500 mg/m², fatal pneumonitis, sudden death and grade 3 neutropenia at the dose level paclitaxel/gemcitabine 175/3,000 mg/m². The MTD was paclitaxel 175 mg/m² and gemcitabine 2,500 mg/m². The average dose intensity at this dose level was 98%. The overall intent-to-treat response rate was 35.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 17.97% - 53.47%). Overall median survival was 36 weeks (95% CI, 24-48). Conclusion: Paclitaxel and gemcitabine can be safely administered at a high dose intensity on an every-other-week schedule. The recommended phase II dose is paclitaxel 175 mg/m² and gemcitabine 2,500 mg/m².     

Phase II study of preoperative chemoradiation with S‐1 plus oxaliplatin in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer

A phase II study of preoperative chemoradiation (CRT) with S‐1 plus oxaliplatin in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer was conducted. The total radiotherapy dose was 50.4 Gy. Chemotherapy consisted of oxaliplatin 50 mg/m² on days 1, 8, 22 and 29 and S‐1 80 mg/m² per day on days 1–14 and 22–35. The tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was measured using diffusion‐weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW‐MRI) before and after CRT. Total mesorectal excision was performed within 6 ± 2 weeks. The primary end‐point was the pathological complete response (pCR) rate. A total of 38 patients were enrolled. The pCR rate was 22.9% (8/35; 95% CI, 10.9–42.1), and 10 (28.6%) patients showed near‐total tumor regression. There was no grade 4 adverse event, and grade 3 adverse events included leukopenia (5.4%), diarrhea (5.4%), anorexia (2.7%) and nausea (2.7%). The tumor ADC was calculated in 38 patients (including those who participated in the phase I study). The post‐CRT ADC (P = 0.037) and the percentage change in ADC (P = 0.026) were significantly correlated with pathological response. In conclusion, preoperative CRT with S‐1 plus oxaliplatin showed promising results in pathological responses and favorable toxicity profiles. (Cancer Sci 2013; 104: 111–115)     

Phase I/II trial of chemoradiotherapy with concurrent S‐1 and cisplatin for clinical stage II/III esophageal carcinoma (JCOG 0604)

We carried out a phase I/II trial of chemoradiotherapy concurrent with S‐1 and cisplatin to determine the maximum tolerated dose and recommended dose and to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this treatment in patients with esophageal carcinoma. Thoracic esophageal cancer patients with clinical stage II/III disease, excluding T4, were eligible. Chemotherapy consisted of S‐1 at a dose of 60–80 mg/m²/day on days 1–14, and cisplatin at 75 mg/m² on day 1, repeated twice every 4 weeks. Single daily radiation of 50.4 Gy was given in 28 fractions concurrently starting on day 1. Patients achieving an objective response after chemoradiotherapy underwent two additional cycles of chemotherapy. Patient accrual was terminated early due to slow enrolment after 44 patients were accrued. In the phase I part, two of six patients experienced dose‐limiting toxicities at each level of S‐1 (S‐1 60 or 80 mg/m²/day). Considering treatment compliance, the recommended dose was determined to be S‐1 60 mg/m²/day. The complete response rate, the primary endpoint of phase II, was 59.5% (22/37; 90% confidence interval, 44.6–73.1%; weighted threshold, 57.2%; P = 0.46 by the exact binomial test) on central review. In the phase II part, 3‐year progression‐free survival was 48.4%, with a 3‐year overall survival of 61.9%. Grade 3 or 4 toxicity in phase II included leukopenia (57.9%), neutropenia (50%), hyponatremia (28.9%), anorexia (21.1%), anemia (18.4%), thrombocytopenia (18.4%), and febrile neutropenia (2.6%). No treatment‐related deaths were observed. Although this combination showed acceptable toxicity and favorable 3‐year survival, the study did not meet its primary endpoint. This trial was registered at the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000000710.     

Ten‐year follow‐up of a phase 2 study of dose‐intense paclitaxel with cisplatin and cyclophosphamide as initial therapy for poor‐prognosis,advanced‐stage epithelial ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND:

The objective of this study was to assess activity and toxicity in patients with newly diagnosed, advanced‐stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) who were receiving dose‐intense paclitaxel, cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, and filgrastim delivered with a flexible dosing schedule.

METHODS:

Patients with stage III/IV EOC received cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m², followed by a 24‐hour infusion of paclitaxel 250 mg/m² and cisplatin 75 mg/m² on Day 2. Filgrastim began on Day 3 at 10 μg/kg daily for 9 days. Patients received 6 cycles of all drugs. Those who achieved a pathologic complete response or had microscopic residual disease at the conclusion of 6 cycles of therapy received an additional 2 to 4 cycles of paclitaxel with cyclophosphamide. Patients who had an objective response continued on cyclophosphamide and paclitaxel.

RESULTS:

Sixty‐two patients were enrolled. Thirty‐two of 62 patients had stage IIIC disease, and 26 of 62 patients had stage IV disease. According to an intent‐to‐treat analysis, 55 patients (89%) experienced a clinical complete remission. At a median potential follow‐up of 11.4 years, the median progression‐free survival was 18.9 months, and the median survival was 5.4 years. The most serious toxicity was grade 3/4 neutropenic fever (35%). Although all participants developed peripheral neuropathy, improvement in neuropathic symptoms began with the decrease or cessation of paclitaxel.

CONCLUSIONS:

The studied regimen yielded a high response rate and encouraging overall survival. The current data and those reported by the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group suggest that further study is warranted of dose‐dense or dose‐intense paclitaxel regimens in women with newly diagnosed, advanced‐stage EOC. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

Phase I/II study of bortezomib‐melphalan‐prednisolone for previously untreated Japanese patients with multiple myeloma

This phase I/II study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of bortezomib‐melphalan‐prednisolone in Japanese patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma who are ineligible for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. One hundred and one patients were enrolled, and 99 patients received up to nine 6‐week cycles of bortezomib (0.7/1.0/1.3 mg/m²) on days 1, 4, 8, 11, 22, 25, 29, and 32 in cycles 1–4 and on days 1, 8, 22, and 29 in cycles 5–9, with melphalan (9 mg/m²) and prednisolone (60 mg/m²) on days 1–4 of each cycle. The recommended dose was determined in the phase I portion, and the overall response rate and safety of bortezomib‐melphalan‐prednisolone at the recommended dose were assessed in the phase II portion. The recommended dose of bortezomib was determined to be 1.3 mg/m². Grade 3 or higher non‐hematological adverse events included diarrhea (12%) and peripheral neuropathy (10%); grade 4 hematological adverse events included lymphopenia (41%), neutropenia (30%), and thrombocytopenia (22%). Eleven patients had lung injury associated with bortezomib; two had grade 3 disease, and the other nine had grade 1 or 2 disease. Of the 86 patients treated with 1.3‐mg/m² bortezomib in phases I and II, the median number of treatment cycles was 4.5, and the overall response rate was 70% (95% confidence interval: 59–79%). Bortezomib‐melphalan‐prednisolone with 1.3‐mg/m² bortezomib was considered to be tolerable and effective in Japanese patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma. However, further investigation is needed to refine the administration schedule.